Slashdot Mirror


Man Charged in Model Airplane Plot To Bomb Pentagon

garymortimer writes "A 26-year-old Massachusetts man with a physics degree was arrested and charged Wednesday with plotting an attack on the Pentagon and the U.S. Capitol with remote-controlled model aircraft, authorities said. Rezwan Ferdaus, a U.S. citizen from Ashland, Massachusetts, planned to use model aircraft filled with C-4 plastic explosives. As a result of an undercover FBI investigation, Ferdaus, who has a physics degree from Northeastern University in Boston, was charged with attempting to provide material support and resources to al Qaeda for attacks on U.S. soldiers overseas. His federal public defender couldn't be reached immediately for comment."

70 of 515 comments (clear)

  1. God dammit by Dyinobal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well shit does this mean I have to get groped before using my RC airplanes? I hope they are willing to at least give me a happy ending if so. I'm tired of them being teases.

    1. Re:God dammit by sg_oneill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one who reads this and is reminded of the scene in 4 lions with the terrorist who wants to strap dynamite to pigeons to blow up , uh, jews or something.

      Pretty sure if a 757 can't destroy the pentagon, sure as hell a toy airplane with a stick of dynamite taped to it sure as hell wouldn't.

      At some point we're going to realise that most western terrorists are not Bin laden's but angry clowns.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:God dammit by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2

      True. But if I'm working at the pentagon, I still don't want the toy airplane with C4 going off next to my window.

      Also, there is a subtle difference between C4 and dynamite.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    3. Re:God dammit by Sarius64 · · Score: 2

      Interesting analysis. Since the C4 can't destroy something on the scale you feel important maybe you would take on the job of explosion analysis and test how much it will? Here, you hold the C4 while I go push this button.

    4. Re:God dammit by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're forgetting something...

      The vast majority of energy released in such a plane crash is done so burning off the fuel. The ballistic energy of the craft combined with the engine thrust is fairly small put next to that.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:God dammit by edibobb · · Score: 2

      Not groped, but you will have to take your shoes off before your turn on your transmitter.

  2. *sigh* Not Again... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to wonder the nature of the situation when the charges are for, "attempting to provide material support", as in, was he in contact with anyone who was actually planning to bomb anything, or was everyone he interacted with affiliated with law enforcement, and they took a disgruntled man and groomed him into the position they're not charging him for.

    We'll probably never really know, which is why I really dislike conspiracy type charges when there aren't several people charged.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:*sigh* Not Again... by rusl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well you did make me RTFA retarded AC and I think that TWX is wrong: we probably will know. It seems this is another "conspiracy" of one where the FBI eggs on a crazy guy and supplies him with all the tools to turn his bad feelings into a charge they can pin on him. Given that this is the initial CNN article, and that is usually when the case for the FBI is presented most favourably because there has been no time for journalists to investigate more in-depth.... Well, you can read this and see that it's probably entrapment when described most favourably so likely will be conclusively that later on when more embarrassing facts start to be revealed.

      from TFA:

      ""There is no information to indicate he was connected to a foreign terrorist organization. It appears he was radicalized watching videos on the internet. He was given the opportunity to back down, but he never wavered" from his intention to carry out the attacks, the source said."

      "The FBI agents also gave Ferdaus six AK-47 assault rifles and three grenades, but they weren't functional,"

      "he began supplying the FBI undercover agents with cell phones rigged to act as electric switches for improved explosive devices"

      "Undercover federal agents also gave Ferdaus 25 pounds of fake C-4 explosives"

      "The investigation also involved a cooperating witness"

      "law enforcement official said Ferdaus posed no immediate danger to the public because undercover operatives kept in close contact with him"

      Yep, pretty much the same story as the other "terrorists" the authorities have caught: (not the incompetent real terrorists that the public caught) Entrapment.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    2. Re:*sigh* Not Again... by Flyskippy1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep, another case of the FBI finding a 'terrorist' by finding a mildly disgruntled guy, giving him fake weapons and explosives, suggesting a terrorist plot to him, and then 'catching' him when he did exactly what they wanted him to do.

      Like these guys:
      http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-arrests-terrorists-sting-operations-dallas-springfield/story?id=8666300

      And these guys:
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/11/families-struggle-in-the-_n_957365.html

    3. Re:*sigh* Not Again... by kylemonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When the FBI is involved, it always turns out to be some disgruntled sad sack or sad sacks who they talk into some terrorist act. There is an endless supply of such broken-down, weak-willed people, which gives the FBI a steady stream of good PR to keep their budget fat. I'll hold my applause until they catch someone smarter than I am.

    4. Re:*sigh* Not Again... by gtbritishskull · · Score: 2

      The smarter people aren't actually *caught*. Think commandos and Hellfire-armed UCAVs.

      Do you want to know why they aren't caught? BECAUSE THEY AREN'T ATTACKING!!! Unless you want to provide me with a link of one that succeeded.

  3. Did anyone tell him by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Pentagon is *really* big. So is the Capitol. Unless the remote controlled airplane was a full size Cessna, you couldn't carry enough C4 to do any real damage to either of them. The FBI spokesperson called him an aspiring terrorist. With the emphasis on ASS, I'd say.

    1. Re:Did anyone tell him by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Apart from the damage to moral of having an explosive device go off within a secure perimeter, and the economic/logistical damage of having an area sealed off for a time for the ensuing investigation and repairs, you mean? You really don't get asymmetric warfare, do you? It's not all about the body-count.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Did anyone tell him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These things frequently end up being about hypothetical explosives that the FBI contact is telling the suspect they can obtain.

    3. Re:Did anyone tell him by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well some remote controlled airplanes are actually pretty big. Here is one with a 12' wing span. It could lift say 7 kg with no real problem. http://www.hobby-lobby.com/telemaster12.htm Maybe cut that to 4kg and use electric power and if you covered it in light grey you no one would see it until impact. but 4 or 7 kg would kill anyone outside near the impact point. You would aim it at an entrance time the impact for say 5:50 pm in the winter so that it is dark, Sure it wouldn't blow up the entire building but it would still suck to die or have your arm or leg blown off.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Did anyone tell him by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Clearly a mentally disturbed individual, targeted, groomed and his mental delusions preyed upon to create a opportunity for public terrorism promotion and of course prop the ego and future careers of a couple of agents.

      Real indicators of delusion, using a $6,500 dollar model aircraft, grandiose plots with little action (the agents did pretty much everything) and, no indication of employment whilst living with parents.

      The really disturbing things about the way it is being presented are, ohh look he had a physics degree (smells of targeting all university students in science areas as potential threats) and, he took photos of buildings (why he didn't just use street view remains or the thousands of available photos on line are further indicators of deranged thinking). Also they were careful to exclude from the press releases any indication of mental disturbance in the individual, even though it seems pretty obvious.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:Did anyone tell him by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 2

      No worries, they'll just build the next road over the top of you. Just think of all the cement mixing jobs you'll help create!

    6. Re:Did anyone tell him by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I just watched the video on CNN. The "models" were 1/10 scale replicas of an F4 Phantom and an F86 Sabre. The plan was to use them as drones, and the explosions were mostly just a decoy. He and his helpers would then use the assault rifles to fire on people while they left the buildings, since you can bet your butt the pentagon and, especially, the Capitol building have evacuation procedures and that people would be coming out.

      Besides, the goals of "terrorism," ever since the Anglo-Irish War, has always been to cause the enemy to grossly over-react, thus causing domestic support for your oppressors to erode. Example: in 1922, the IRA assassinated 6 British special police within the span of about an hour. The auxiliary police and army then shot up a gaelic football match, killing civilians. There was then backlash in England and a loss of support for continued occupation of Ireland.

      This plan really wasn't that bad, all things considered -- especially when you realize that any semblance of a successful attack on those two targets would bring down a crack-down on civil liberties so fast we'd all start reminiscing about when we had all those freedoms left under the PATRIOT ACT.

    7. Re:Did anyone tell him by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, our response to the minor incident is what causes the damage?

      As a physician I can't help but notice the similarity: You would not believe how many disease conditions are caused by a person's own immune system over-reacting to an otherwise relatively benign situation. Take for example the leading cause of death - heart disease due to atherosclerosis. A condition where macrophages (part of the body's defenses) decide to "eat" LDL cholesterol because they think that this natural component of the blood-stream is a foreign body. Unfortunately for them they don't know that they can't digest LDL-cholesterol, so they keep eating it without metabolizing it, turning into "foam cells", dying, and releasing all sorts of nasty stuff when they die, nasty stuff that calls other macrophages to the scene to see what's going on. Unfortunately the scene happens to be your coronary arteries. Almost all rheumatic and inflammatory diseases are caused by similar mechanisms - overstimulation of the host's immune response leading to tissue damage from one cell line or another, or overproduction of antibodies or complement, etc; as well as some infectious ones (like TB, for example).

      Perhaps we should deal all of their plots a fatal blow by tempering our responses

      Well if you are responding then you are not the one with the initiative. You need to get them to respond to you. And you need to deal the "fatal blow" by either removing their ability to hurt you (completely impossible because explosives are so easy to make - they were making them in the 11th century for god's sake), or removing their desire to hurt you. I would put my money on the latter, but honestly this would require a complete re-write of current policy as well as a major re-shuffling of world politics and economics. So that's not going to happen either. What's left is damage control and trying to minimize the size of events and losses when they do happen. I guess that's what is being done now.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  4. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmm . . . Christians have bombed federal buildings and abortion clinics in the U.S., and buildings in Norway.

    By your logic, physics degrees should not be given to Christians because they might build nuclear bombs and drop them on people.

  5. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by ZankerH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a perfect world, scientific/engineering degrees would be reserved for people who display rational, scientific thought in all areas of their life, and don't suspend it when it comes to 2000 years old fairy tales promoted by authority figures, yes.

  6. Re:Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice conspiracy theory but....
    Would you ever be fooled by this setup? "Yo dude, go buy a model airplane and I'll give you some C4 and ....."
    Please. Reality here.
    First the article said the FBI worked with an informant. The idiot probably asked a buddy how to get some C4.
    The guy wanted to do something and apparently the FBI just helped him along. I'm sure they have every meeting taped. According to the article they at least tried half-heatedly to make sure this idiot was serious. I'm sure that's on tape to.
    Was he setup? Yep, the moment his intentions were clear, the FBI set him up.
    BTW, its only entrapment if he can say "But for the actions of the FBI, he would never have done the crime."

    The saying about online computer games "Don't be a dick", that goes for real life to. This idiot sounds like a real dick.

  7. So now we're down to catching the nutcases by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A real, full-size airliner barely put a dent in the Pentagon. A remote controlled plane the size of a Cessna full of C4 would break a few windows.

    This guy was a physics major and can't calculate how much C4 it would take to punch a hole in a solid concrete building?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      He was going to have 6 well armed people outside the doors shooting people as they escaped. And even a small explosion would probably drive people out of the building.

    2. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was his plan? He might have as well tried to set up an ambush outside the White House, or Congress. This plan is so badly thought out, so badly implemented and relied so heavily on the FBI providing him with bad materials that they might as well charge him with being terminally stupid. This plan wasn't going to go anywhere, and wasn't going to do any damage. If he would have been lucky, he might have been able to shoot one or two guards on the way to "the door".

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    3. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This may come as a shock, but there is not exactly a lack of well-trained, well-armed individuals at the Pentagon. Six idiots with guns walking up to the place is not an excellent plan.

    4. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, IIRC, the Pentagon is more than just "solid concrete", and has a lot of extra reinforcements and materials in its walls to withstand bomb blasts better than normal buildings.

      An R/C plane (or even a Cessna) full of C4 wouldn't have done much besides break a few windows, as you say.

      I'm going to go ahead and give the terrorists the secret here about how to destroy the US. I hope I don't get prosecuted for terrorism or treason or whatever. It's pretty simple, really: just pour a lot of money into the campaigns for far right-wing Republican candidates like Bachmann, and maybe find other ways to con the voters into electing these wackos, not just in the Presidential race but in Congressional races too. After they get elected, just sit back and watch the country implode. You can also do the same by getting more Democrats elected, but it won't be quite as fast as with the Republicans (this is probably debatable though). Of course, there's lots of corporations already pouring money into these peoples' campaigns, so maybe they should be prosecuted for terrorism... Or, you can just do nothing at all and wait; we don't need terrorists to destroy this country, we're doing a great job of it all by ourselves.

    5. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by rusl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We're down to supplying nutcases with the fake tools that make them think they are playing a "terrorist" video game. Then we charge them for their unfulfilled intention to use the tools that they though were real that we gave them.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    6. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by ebonum · · Score: 2

      I'm sure prosecutors will say that he could have caused massive destruction and killed scores of people.

      I wonder how he would get the plastic explosive to go off at precisely the right moment. Assume this thing is going 100mpg, if you are a millisecond too early, it explodes harmlessly in the air. If you are a millisecond too late, the plastic explosive will go splat and detonator will go flying into pieces. Let's not even get into making a proper shaped charge.

      Remember the NYC firecracker bomber who put some natural gas canisters in a car in Times Square? Getting natural gas to explode is tricky. The best he could have hoped for was to break the windows of the car. I sincerely doubt he could even created an explosion strong enough to break the windows. Prosecutors claimed he could have killed dozens. I don't think they will let the truth get in their way when they go after this airplane bomber.

      There are two issues here. One is the desire to kill and attempting to kill. The other is the actual threat level. It seems this guy wanted to kill. But the threat level doesn't seem to be high enough to cause concern.

      There seems to be a desire to describe the enemy as very very dangerous. If the enemy is extremely dangerous, then we need a massive force of people - all with high paying jobs that come with huge retirement parachutes. Unless these people find and stop plots to kill 100's of 1000's of people, why are we paying them and going broke in the process? 35,000 people die in car accidents a year and we get excited about that. How many people have been killed on US soil by terrorists since 2002? How many actual plots that would have resulted in actual fatalities have been stopped?

    7. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The full sized airplane had trouble breaking windows. A well kept secret is that the Pentagon windows were stronger than the building itself. The idea being that a sniper trying to shoot someone would prefer the window (stopping nearly everything, including most sniper rifles), while the walls wouldn't. No need to armor the walls when nobody would try to shoot through them. They collected most of the windows undamaged from the rubble.

    8. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by ShooterNeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With the Times Square bomber, he also had a half-assed ANFO bomb in the car as well. Why half-assed? Because he didn't follow even the most basic and logical testing routine. If you want to make homemade explosives that you are not sure will go off, you need to

          1. Make SURE you have the right ingredients (he had the wrong kind of Fertilizer because apparently he can't read labels)
        2. TEST your concoction, with a large enough sample to be sure it works.

      Oh, and multiple detonators are probably also a good idea. Don't just rely on a single fuse that might go out.

      The various 'terrorists attempts' over the last 10 years have been so pathetic they make me angry. (because we are spending trillions of dollars to fight enemies who are so incompetent they couldn't shoot someone in the back without blowing off their own foot)

    9. Re:So now we're down to catching the nutcases by cusco · · Score: 5, Informative

      The walls of the Pentagram are three feet of solid ferro-concrete, they were designed to take a direct hit from a Nazi 500-pound bomb (really). The roof was later reinforced to withstand a very near miss from a Soviet nuke. I've never understood why the felt the need to cover the entire thing with kevlar, which had just been completed on the wing that was hit by the airliner. That wing had been emptied during the remodel process, almost everyone killed in the attack was in the process of moving back in.

      I know far too much trivia.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  8. I predict by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's too bad that a fun hobby like RC aircraft was co-opted by the military for use in target drones and later surveillance aircraft and now weapons platforms. Of course one understands the reasons - they are cheap, well no now they are $100 million each but they used to be cheap, they are quiet, and you don't need to put a pilot in danger or have the whole logistical set up of a full airbase to support one. At some point the airbase itself becomes a target that needs to be defended. A drone can be launched or recovered from almost anywhere - depending on the drone.

    It was an idea that made sense. But ideas grow, just like the concept of lighting gunpowder behind a ball of lead inside a tube. The basic properties of drones remain - almost anyone can fly one. They are cheap. They are quiet. And you can't put a hellfire missile on one but you certainly could put a couple pounds of explosives, and fly it absolutely anywhere. And I mean anywhere. If the military can do it, so can you. Because of this innate problem, my prediction is that RC aircraft - owning one, manufacturing one, or flying one, is about to be grabbed by the government and handed to the military. Just like today guns are under strict control, RC aircraft will soon be under strict control. And that's sad because the vast, vast majority of RC aircraft are flown by hobbyists for fun.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:I predict by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 5, Informative

      I fly RC planes and am a member of the AMA (Academy of Model Aeronautics). Congress is working to implement new legislation to control "UAV's" (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), which WILL legally control RC hobby airplanes. The AMA has been working with Congress and the FAA to help insure the viability and robustness of our wonderful sport, which prepares young folks for careers in avionics and space, as well as being a darned fun (and expensive :)) hobby. Here is a link to the AMA's government relations site: http://www.modelaircraft.org/aboutama/gov.aspx. This is an issue that is hot and current. Here is the current situation, which is coming to a head in the next few months, per the AMA's website: "Information received at the recent AUVSI conference indicates the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for FAA’s proposed regulation for small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) is on track for release in mid December 2011. It’s anticipated the new rule will address model aircraft operations and will provide a provision for community based organizations such as the AMA to submit their own set of standards. If adopted, these standards will provide the modeling community an alternative means of complying with the sUAS rule. At this point AMA is hard at work in developing a set of standards aimed at allowing the aeromodeling enthusiasts to continue enjoying the hobby in much the same way as they do today. ". Actions like this crazy physicist certainly don't help, but they point out the wisdom of a rational approach to a hobby that can be militarized. We'll see what happens.

    2. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is disturbing to me. I use puffer kites filled with helium and V shaped balsa structures with those stick-up lights (as seen on TV) to make realistic looking UFO hoaxes. Your depth perception really doesn't work well at night and you honestly can't tell how big something is in the sky. Makes for really good stock news footage for the shaky cam folks -- hay, maybe they can even get a buck for it. I'll never tell......good for the economy right?

      One of my dreams was to have one I didn't have to tow behind my pontoon boat with hundreds of yards of spider line. Now you're telling me that they want me to file a flight plan if I drop in a couple of Cox .41's and sit at the bar while I fly it around? This is no good.

      It's cold at night in the pontoon and the wife bitches endlessly. Even my drunken buddies wimp out when the dew sets in and nobody can tell if it was the dew, or if we were just laughing so hard that we all pissed our pants. Then they don't even want to go back into bar in case there is the mythical "hot chick" that will see that they pissed their pants, and they blew their one chance in life to out punt their kick coverage.

      I'd hate to switch to big foot hoaxes.....someone might take a shot at me and it's hunting season again.....

  9. Re:Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You might even say, somebody set up them the bomb.

  10. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, more than likely he's a Unitarian.

  11. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because denying religious people an education will make the world a safer, more peaceful and forward thinking place? I seriously doubt that.
    I'm more inclined to think equal opportunities and education for all, regardless of their beliefs, is a very positive step forward.

  12. The right demographic... by airfoobar · · Score: 2

    A 26-year-old Massachusetts man with a physics degree

    So, what was his Slashdot handle?

  13. Catching nutcases was always the goal by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All terrorists are nutcases. No sane person decides that cold-blooded mass murder (often of people only tangentially related to the source of their anger) is the best way to accomplish their goals.

    Given my druthers, I'd prefer smart terrorists. Guys like this making RC plane bombs, or that guy who tried to make a dirty bomb to set off at Obama's inauguration. They tend to be easier to catch, because they outsmart themselves. Someone less "clever" might just buy a gun and shoot some people -- see Scott Roeder, Byron Williams, Nidal Hassan, and Jared Loughner.

    All different motives (anti-abortion, Glenn Beck told me to, anti-military, straight-up crazy), and all of them not-all-there. Three of the four successful, and the fourth (Williams) only failed because society was lucky enough for him to get a traffic ticket on the way to the shooting. I'll take a dent in the Pentagon's walls any day of the week.

    1. Re:Catching nutcases was always the goal by electron+sponge · · Score: 2

      Dropping the atomic bombs wasn't even a questionable decision morally, it was the right thing to do. America wasn't dealing with rational, modern thinkers. They were dealing with medieval thinkers who had manufactured modern implements of war. The only way to get the message across that continued fighting was useless was to glass them. Had America been able to drop the bomb on Germany I'd have supported it too. That war was the greatest horror mankind has ever faced and anything that ended it sooner rather than later was a good thing. The Second World War was a racist, awful conflict. The right side won. Yes, we let the nuclear genie out of the bottle in the process. I'll take that over the alternative, which was likely millions more Japanese and American (as well as British, Canadian, Indian, South African, French, Dutch, Belgian, Australian and New Zealander) dead.

      That's neither here nor there, though. The modern FBI operates with the intent to entrap for publicity, much to the discredit of the nation which lays claim to being the most free people on the planet. Freedom means trusting the people who live here.

    2. Re:Catching nutcases was always the goal by Tsingi · · Score: 2

      All terrorists are nutcases. No sane person decides that cold-blooded mass murder (often of people only tangentially related to the source of their anger) is the best way to accomplish their goals.

      No one said that Bush and Cheney were sane.

  14. Re:Yeah right... by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    AC, read this http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/08/fbi-terrorist-informants
    Its the old skill set of "preemption," "prevention," and "disruption"
    A massive informant network (rakers) spots "a" lone wolf and an undercover operative is sent in to see what can be done.
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/ap-documents-expansion-of-nypd-into-domestic-cia/
    The operative will propose a plot, provide explosives and then solve the crime :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  15. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    You can grow a pair and realize that the vast majority of these nut jobs are muslim, or you can bury your head in the sand and pretend they're not. Your choice. Though it might help if you leave the west for a bit and travel the world and see for yourself exactly how true it is.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  16. And model rocketry is next on the list.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3

    The government is starting a new process to restrict shipment and sales of model rocket engines, after getting their asses handed to them in a big court case against rocket hobbyists a couple years ago.

    Next hobby on the chopping block-- Punkin Chunkers? BattleBots? , DIY anything?

    That's right citizen...just sit on your couch and watch the tube...actually building things helps the terrorists!

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  17. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can also grow a brain and realize that the vast majority of these nut jobs are mad because we just won't leave them the fuck alone, and are constantly getting involved in their countries' business in the mideast because of our addiction to oil. If we didn't have troops and military bases over there, we wouldn't have them trying to blow us up all the time. Maybe if we minded our own fucking business instead of trying to be an evil empire, we wouldn't have so many enemies.

    How many suicide bombers have attacked Switzerland?

  18. Re:eh? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    A clear triumph for America's powers of cultural assimilation! While our barbaric foreign enemies carry out suicide attacks, our beneficent influence induces the local ones to attempt a weaponized UAV program! Heck, one more generation and they'll probably be saving the bombs for use against Planned Parenthood, and exercising their second amendment rights against other targets, just like the good, god-fearing folks at home who are sensible enough to fear the right god...

  19. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by Grave · · Score: 2

    The vast majority of these nut jobs have brown hair.
    The vast majority of these nut jobs are humans.
    The vast majority of these nut jobs have two ears.

    Want to know that ALL of the nut jobs have in common?

    THEY'RE NUT JOBS!

  20. Look at history by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

    Name me a time when there wasn't violence going on in the middle east. It was all rainbows and unicorns until Israel showed up and ruined the peace party.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  21. Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by Weezul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As I understand it, all Islamic terrorists arrested inside the U.S. were put up to it by the FBI.

    You see, the FBI prefers to train it's own terrorists because doing so is far easier than catching the real deal, who might be dangerous, or hard to find, or worse not exist at all. Don't you feel safer with the FBI making sure there are terrorists to catch?

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by Weezul · · Score: 2

      In fact, the FBI kinda started that way. Hoover initially tasked the FBI with finding stolen cars. You see, stolen cars eventually turn up, meaning they'd close a case, meaning they could brag to congress about their closed cases. Yes, that's why some many federal police forces exist today, the FBI cheated to elevate it's closed cases ratio during it' early days.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    2. Re:Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by Nutria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the hell does an RC aircraft "filled" with C4 even get off the ground

      You idiot. The same way that a B-52 "filled" with bombs get off the ground: less plane + fuel + payload than total wing load + thrust.

      how do you avoid having it stall

      The same way every other plane avoids stalling.

      blow you up instead of your target.

      Carefully, you jackass,

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by travbrad · · Score: 2

      Well C4 doesn't explode on impact, so there shouldn't be a huge risk of blowing himself up if it crashed. You can literally shoot a bullet at C4 and it won't explode, so crashing an RC plane isn't gonna do it. It was fake C4 given to him by the FBI though, so I'd say he was at 0 risk of blowing himself up even if he knows how to rig a detonator (which I seriously doubt if he bought FAKE C4)

    4. Re:Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      That analogy is false on its face. In the first place there is nothing even inherently illegal about a better accountant doing taxes better. A reasonable person assumes that a credentialed accountant is acting legally and in good faith unless something indicates otherwise.

      And this you contrast with (inherently criminal) plotting to attack the government and kill people? The minimum requirement to sign on to such an effort is, duh, an intent to kill people. That's about as 'much different' as you can get in the same universe.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    5. Re:Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, let's see, the FBI GAVE him grenades, AK47's and 25lbs of C4 (all duds), but THIS guy is the problem ??

      Even Apple fanbois can be lured into accepting FREE Android phones and tablets !

      What does this sort of entrapment prove ?
      That everyone has their price ?

      I'll bet that it's even EASIER to convince, say, Libyans and Syrians to PROTEST against their own governments. Especially if you give them ACTUAL AK47's, grenades and C4 !

    6. Re:Worse, maybe it's FBI entrapment by rocket+rancher · · Score: 2

      It sounds like all the FBI did in this case was give him someone to talk to, and some fake weapons/explosives. Everything else this guy did indicated he was entirely serious about this all on his own. He was even given a chance to back down and didn't. Its probably for the best the FBI picked him up prior to him finding someone that actually had malicious intent.

      Sometimes tinfoil is just for baking people...

      I think the FBI have learned lessons from their past attempts to manage information flow around high-profile terrorism cases. The purpose of a press release is to influence public opinion -- the suspect-didn't-back-down gambit in the PR (something that has not occurred in previous terror-related FBI PRs) is obviously designed to get the FBI off the entrapment hook in the public's eye. But I can see an astute defense lawyer demanding the FBI prove that the suspect would have continued his activities absent the offer of materiel support, if this case ever comes to a public trial. That would provide a serious amount of negative PR opportunities for the FBI if they failed to demonstrate the suspect's resolve. I would predict the FBI maneuvers to never let this case see the light of day, for that reason alone. If it does reach the public courts though, I really hope a high-profile defense lawyer steps up and takes the FBI to school on this one.

  22. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

    As a Unitarian, let me assure you that we couldn't get out of committee meetings long enough to attempt any sort of terrorist action. Our secret plots all come out easily, anyway, because a major tenet of our faith is open discussion around the Sacred Coffeepot.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  23. Re:Yeah right... by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's nothing but the FBI's words that he would have done the crime if not for the FBI stepping in and arresting him. He could have been at the conceptual "I wonder what would happen if" stage when the FBI stepped in and gave him the means he didn't have before and encouraged him to give greater motivation as well. The FBI has done that before. At this point the only side out there is the FBI trying to sell a press release that they alone saved Washington from another exploding airplane (oh, and we could use more funding, thanks). And from their track record, I'm not one to blindly believe the FBI.

  24. Re:Rezwan Ferdaus is a moslem by Tsingi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So in other words, you feel your atheism gives you superior morality.

    His atheism allows him to question morality, his own and others, as opposed to morals dictated by a religion that must be adhered to without question.

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
    by the wise as false,
    and by the rulers as useful.

    — Lucius Annæus Seneca.

    Terrorism, the new religion.

  25. Why it works by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I remember hearing big-name Republican candidates and pundits telling us that there would be a 9/11 ever few months if Obama got elected. Strange how it has seemed to work out.

    They were willy enough to believe what he said while campaigning. As far as civil liberties go and the program to do whatever they hell we want to terrorists, he just kept doing what Bush did because once he was in the hotseat and got to look at what was really going on he realized we actually did need to worry a bit.

    So yeah, that did turn out better, thanks to Bush laying the groundwork and Obama being rather ineffective and waffling.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Smells like a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let me get this straight. The FBI finds some useful idiot, gives him money/C4/whatever and coaches him on what to do. They create the problem... Then it makes national news? This is more than absurd. There was little chance of him actually completing this plan, much less actually inflicting any damage. This should haven't even made national news.

    But let me state the obvious: This is a PR campaign. It keeps us afraid of the evil alCIAda boogeymen, and further gives the government more excuses to clamp down on us, the slave class.

    As someone who has worked on drones for over a decade, I can tell you first hand that these drones could not have carried enough C4 to be anything more than a nuisance. Further, it takes more than buying an R/C plane to be a credible threat. He probably would have crashed, being the patsy hack he was. Oh wait, that's right. He wasn't a threat after all, according to the article.

    Ask yourself. Why did this make national news? Did I mention the CIA has a budget for propaganda?

  27. Re:Yeah right... by Nutria · · Score: 2

    Why would anyone with half a brain do this? A model plane with a bit of C4 wouldn't do much to the exterior.

    So you do something *besides* flying into the roof. Like, for instance, fly it into the the main entrance.

    It would smash into the door and create a big C4+fuel fireball, killing or seriously wounding anyone in the vicinity and scaring the crap out of everyone else, while sending our Dear Leaders into a panic.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  28. Doing the "right thing" by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you feel your atheism gives you superior morality

    "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Doing the "right thing" by jkirch · · Score: 2

      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire

  29. Re:Rezwan Ferdaus is a moslem by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

    NEWSFLASH: Fundamentalists are nuts! Story at 11!

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  30. Re:Christ, how stupid are we? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    If we minded our own business instead of trying to take their oil

    I was under the impression that we paid for it. If not, where did the King of Saudi Arabia get all that money from? Did he win it in a card game?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  31. Re:Yeah right... by anagama · · Score: 2

    Simple solution. Only use those parts that prove your case and burry the parts that show the setup. Do you seriously think the Feds would even think about offering the parts in which they cajole him into action at trial?

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  32. Re: secondary targets by Slacker · · Score: 2

    *Ahem*
    Drone control is already centralized. In Nevada and California. Many of them are fly_by_Sat affairs, and the folks that man the flight control centers can go home at the end of the day and play with their kids. I've seen some news footage of the nice set-ups at "mission control". Biggest issue this brings up is making the whole affair too much like a video game, and killing real people from a nice cozy office thousands of miles from the battle. That, and the fact that these operators aren't getting the benefits that in-the-air combat pilots are getting for flying in a combat zone. Even the Brits are piloting their drones from NV.

    Being an RC aircraft guy myself, I hope the utility of having a steady stream of young RC pilots being interested in joining up for miitary service might off-set what this idiot has done in the eyes of the feds when it comes time to evaluate the new rules for RC aircraft.

    I think you may have been eluding to a control center being the target of an attack. Not much to worry about there unless the baddies have ICBMs. Some nice info here:

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4851765

    Here is some video of pilots in action:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZP2AKEqEIU

    And an article titled "Point. Click. Kill: Inside The Air Force's Frantic Unmanned Reinvention" :

    http://www.popsci.com/drones

    --
    ~~~ Trust me, I'm a professional! ~~~
  33. Slightly off topic, but gotta say it. by Rexdude · · Score: 2

    This guy was defeated by the groundwork done by the FBI in tracking him, contacting him and then catching him red handed while he was planning the operation. Note that this wasn't done while he was driving to the Pentagon or setting up his drone. Terrorist plots need to be defeated at the planning stage, and that requires good old investigation and espionage. Not by groping people at the airport check-in queue.

    --
    "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
  34. Re:Kiss Another Hobby Goodbye by JazzHarper · · Score: 2

    I wonder which geeky hobby is next up to be regulated into oblivion.

    Writing programs for your own computer.