Slashdot Mirror


Autism Traits Prove Valuable for Software Testing

Back in 2009 we ran a story about a Chicago based non-profit company that trained high-functioning autistic people to be software testers. Two years later Aspiritech has grown to offer services in Belgium, Japan and Israel. Autistic debuggers are used by large clients like Oracle and Microsoft and have proven to be so good in fact that companies are now recruiting to meet demand. From the article: "Aspiritech's board of directors includes social service providers, therapists, a vocational expert and a software engineer. The nonprofit also received start-up advice and consultation from Keita Suzuki, who has co-founded a similar company, called Kaien, in Japan. Aspiritech has hired and trained seven recruits with Asperger's syndrome. These recruits have since worked on software-testing projects for smartphone and cloud-computing applications. Aspiritech now offers functional-, compatibility- and regression-testing, as well as test-case development, with experience in cloud-computing platforms including Salesforce."

180 comments

  1. What they really should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is just recruit people who bought minecraft. It's really part of the same population set, but these one's are already used to using computers for 10 hours a day doing the same repetitive thing over and over.

    1. Re:What they really should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... but these one's are already used to using computers for 10 hours a day doing the same repetitive thing over and over.

      And you hit up Slashdot how many times a day?

    2. Re:What they really should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I post under this name nearly 10,000 times a day.

  2. And.... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Autism Traits Prove Valuable for Software Testing

    Not to mention for con artists scamming gullible parents of children with autism into believing widely used vaccines caused their kids' disorder, rather than the genes they pass on to said children.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those people seem pretty dedicated to scamming themselves.

    2. Re:And.... by RobinEggs · · Score: 1, Informative

      We don't have the faintest idea, when you get down to it, what causes autism. There's a whole damn pile of candidate genes, but none of them have been linked to a mechanism or even definitively linked to a particular mutation or other defect within the gene itself.

      We know about as much about autism, really, as alchemists knew about chemistry. Just because we understand genetics and ecology on a limited level doesn't mean we've made even one firm, proven conclusion about the source of autism.

    3. Re:And.... by artor3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      But we do know that autism isn't caused by vaccines.

    4. Re:And.... by Diamonddavej · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dozens of identical/fraternal twin studies, initially carried out in the 70s, prove unquestionably that autism is up to 92% genetic. While it's been hard to point to specific genetic anomalies that cause it, it does not invalidate its genetic roots. The genetics of autism is more nuanced and complex than we realised, as are other inherited conditions, it's not genes but also involves e.g. copy number variations.

      Bailey, A., Le Couteur, A., Gottesman, I., Bolton, P., Simonoff, E., Yuzda, E. & Rutter, M. 1995. Autism as a strongly genetic disorder: evidence from a British twin study. Psychological Medicine 25(1), 63-77.

      Glessner, J.T., et al., 2009. Autism genome-wide copy number variation reveals ubiquitin and neuronal genes. Nature 459(7246), 569-573.

    5. Re:And.... by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Science only very rarely shows that some hypothesis is correct. More often, it shows that every other tested hypothesis is wrong, and that the one that's left is just the most likely.

      The "vaccines cause autism" hypothesis has been tested, and is shown to most likely be wrong. The "magic space fairy causes autism" hypothesis hasn't yet been tested, or the "too many hard sneezes while pregnant causes autism" hypothesis, nor a few hundred others. We have such a long way to go...

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    6. Re:And.... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      OTOH, reactions to vaccines do happen, and in some cases can be fatal. If a reaction was near-fatal, it could cause brain damage (eg heart stops beating for long enough that bits of the brain starts to die) and the resulting mental disability could share symptoms with autism. One case would be all the nutjobs need to 'prove' their link.

      The way I see it, even if there was a 1-in-a-million chance of something bad happening as a result of vaccination, it is more likely that something bad will happen if you don't vaccinate, so it's not a hard decision to make.

    7. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's this impressive new field of mathematics called "statistics" - you may have heard about it already on Slashdot. Using statistics, yes, you can often make statements like "x does not cause y". By comparing people with and without x to see if they have the same or different rates of y. If the rates differ, x and y are related. If the rates are the same, then, no, x and y are not related.

      Conveniently, this was done back when people started blaming autism on vaccines. The rates were the same. The severity was the same. The ages were the same.

      Also conveniently, arguments like "different chemistry" are not an effective magical charm against statistics. Especially in the case of autism, where common genes have already been identified, and people with those genes still have the same autism rates whether vaccinated or unvaccinated.

    8. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, unfortunately, if only it where that simple. Womb environment cannot be separated from genetic or epigenetic influence via these methods which only conciser one generation, or even for grandparent/ parent/ child traces, particularly because all three can be multi-generational. Womb environment can appear to have affects 2 generations after the trigger if you are pregnant with a girl at the time of the trigger (as eggs are formed during gestation not after birth). Epigenetic effects although non genetic are perpetuated, such as methaylation of the DNA(which is copied to the new strand after replication), they can fade but are inherited beyond womb environment.

    9. Re:And.... by rla3rd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And the most recent twin study proves that autism is largely environmental.

      "But surprisingly, mathematical modeling suggested that only 38 percent of the cases could be attributed to genetic factors, compared with the 90 percent suggested by previous studies."

      This study would disagree with you.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/health/research/05autism.html

    10. Re:And.... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      By the way, there is a very interesting Sci-fi book called The Speed of Dark where Autism is central to the story (In terms of Sci-fi, it's a near future type of Sci-fi, so it really isn't about science-fiction if that's what you're looking for). This same idea reminds me of that book. All the analysts had a particular form of Autism.

      The audio version is quite good. I actually didn't read the book, but just listened to its full audio version.

    11. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Could be that lack of empathy will get you a new pony too!. Living life with a child on the spectrum is an "adventure" and it really doesn't matter where is comes from. just make it go away!! What matters is doing the best you can for your child. There are a lot of folks with no resources/insurance/help who are at wits end and are very vulnerable.

      These traits are valuable. Perhaps you already have quite a few peers who are asbergers? My guess is that a significant % of SW engineers are. Welcome to the minority

      So read the details. not all get in. that is a problem for those looking for an instant cure BUT it is an opportunity and savior for some.
      better than none

    12. Re:And.... by gregfortune · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The actual statement that you make is that "x is UNLIKELY to case y" along with a degree of confidence. artor3's comment is stated as an absolute so don't bother tossing stats into the discussion. Stats deals with estimation, likelyhood, probability, forecasting, etc. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_intervals and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

      artor3's comment is also stated without citation. Not a good start :(

    13. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not caused by, but potentially triggered by vaccines, in susceptible individuals.

    14. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually don't know anything of the sort. Nobody does. Plenty of evidence suggests that vaccines are or aren't connected to autism. It depends on who funds the study. There may be other factors like genetics and toxins in the environment. All you have to do is research a little bit and you'll discover plenty of fucked up stuff about many (not all) vaccines. Disclaimer: my son (7 years) is autistic.

    15. Re:And.... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that the diagnostic criteria the ASD's are so broad that it covers disorders caused by genetic and environmental factors?

      Or that the ASD symptom set is representative of disorders which can be caused by BOTH environmental and genetic factors?

      Sounds like the criteria need to be re-written.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    16. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we can state "y is UNLIKELY to be caused by x", since unvaccinated children have autism caused by something other than vaccines.

      If it turns out to be anything vaccine related at all, my guess would be that somewhere along the lines one of the viruses mutated to have a shell that futzed with the brain, and that virus strain exists in the wild infecting non-vaccinated people and being converted to inactivated form to vaccinate others with.

    17. Re:And.... by Malica · · Score: 1

      *How* the condition came to be has never been part of the diagnosis of ASD, or for many other illnesses/conditions for that matter. Does it matter that you got cancer because you were genetically predisposed to it, or because you smoked like a chimney? Not really - we still diagnosis it as cancer.

    18. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karl popper would say you can never prove an hypothesis, only falsify it.

    19. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right! This concept may even have a name. Oh what was it? Let's see? Bob's Breast Pump? no... Dale's Dildo? No... Oh ya!!! Occam's Razor! That's it!

      There are also people who think autism may be nature's next evolutionary attempt to adapt use to our current environment where the physical world in not the stumbling block it once was. Brain science is still pretty much alchemy.

    20. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the previous poster meant that we know that autism isn't statistically caused by vaccines. Which is to say, we know that the incidence of developing autism appears to be identical if you take the vaccines vs. if you don't (assuming the only thing different between those two comparisons is the choice of whether to get the vaccine).

      You're right about the odds comparison the way some people see it, but other people see it as "bad stuff that happens randomly (even if it happens much more in the case of missed vaccinations) are not obviously tied to my choices so they must be inevitable; bad stuff that happens 1-in-a-million after vaccination must be caused by the vaccination and are avoidable, and I don't want that to happen to *my* child."

    21. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do NOT know that autism isn't caused by vaccines. Why can't there be multiple causes? Not all people with cancer genes get cancer and some people without cancer genes get cancer. It's been proven that there can be both environmental AND genetic factors involved in cancer, and it stands to reason that the same maybe true for autism as well. I have Asperger Syndrome, and I have children on the autism spectrum. I cannot deny the genetic factor, it's pretty obvious. However, I have also seen with my own eyes vaccine damage, and I have seen the difference between my vaccinated children and my children who did not receive the full lineup of vaccines. It may be purely anecdotal evidence, but when most mothers of children with autism say that there was a notable difference after their one year vaccines, it's worth sitting up and taking notice, don't you think? Besides, this has nothing to do with the article content. Kudos to software developers for recognizing that aspies/auties have valuable skills that can be utilized. Thanks you for the article! Sarah T in Houston TX

    22. Re:And.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There are also people who think autism may be nature's next evolutionary attempt to adapt use to our current environment where the physical world in not the stumbling block it once was.

      The physical world is not a "stubling block" you retard. It exists and we have to interact with it.

      The fantasy that everyone can live in some virtual universe oft heir own in perfect autistic isolation is one only held by autistic people.

      Oh, and all the repetitive activities requiring autistic levels of concentration can be done by...computers.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They rewrite them all the time, every time a new manual comes out it gets rewritten. Perhaps you'd like to give it a shot next time? Or maybe you can pull your head out and realize this particular problem is hard as hell to tackle.

    24. Re:And.... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Possible coincidence- the one year vaccines happen to come near 18 months- and one of the most common types of autism has a regression at 18 months, though it can now be diagnosed earlier with an MRI, before the regression happens.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    25. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      artor3's comment is also stated without citation. Not a good start

      Whereas you've brought two links to wikipedia that don't actually have anything to do with autism or vaccines.

    26. Re:And.... by Lennie · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it is possible to find at least a few cases where it might be the cause.

      But that doesn't justify stopping with vaccines.

      The vaccines safe a lot of lives.

      If there is one thing people can do is to find a gen which helps predict the cause of these cases and test for the gen before vaccination.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    27. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can be fairly confident that heavy metal poisoning can and does cause at least some cases autism. What percentage of cases have that as a causational factor is another and more controversial matter; it cannot be 100%.

      It would be more correct to say that autism is a collection of different disorders with different causes but similar symptoms.

      But it is now well known that many autistics are afflicted by a characteristic set of biochemical dysfunctions, and many people are now claiming a reduction of symptoms by treating them. Note that reduction is not the same as "cure",

    28. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    29. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that recommendation. I just picked it up for my Kindle.

    30. Re:And.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason we KNOW that autism is not caused by vaccines is that huge double blind studies by independent researchers have shown no link. In other words, there was the same incidence of autism in the vaccinated population as in the unvaccinated population. On the other hand, genetics was shown to be a huge factor.

  3. Properly traine software testers by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    do well at software testing. That's really the story here. Autism is irreverent. This very idea is based upon a lot of wrong information about people with Autism.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wish I could mod you up.

      Hollywood's sensationalism has brought us the comic-book idea of what is essentially "game balance" in real life. In real life, you don't gain magical super powers just because you're blind and you aren't somehow a super-genius just because you're shy, introverted and obsessed with details. Autism is not a romantic backstory about how a young boy was crippled at an early age and then developed his mental powers to overcome this weakness. One does not gain flaws for points to spend on buying new character features in real life.

      It's pretty despicable to see this idea being perpetuated, this dramatic blurb about tortured backroom cripples using their super powers for good... Just stop it.

    2. Re:Properly traine software testers by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah my son plays piano and we attended a graduation ceremony where every child played one piece. One boy spent the whole time fiddling with a bit of string attached to his father's bag. When it was his turn to play his parents prompted him to walk down to the front of the room where he stood for a bit, clearly put off by the number of people there. After a moment he sat down at the piano and played like practically nobody I have ever heard before. Then he finished, walked back to his seat and continued to play with the bit of string. I don't even that this is autism. I think its asbergers. This boy who can only play with string and play piano brilliantly has high functioning autism.

    3. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those without aspergers have a flawed sense of time and think of intelligence quantitative and comparable they are by definition sociopaths bred by society that lack any self concept to form functioning morality outside of artificial mysticism of religion and fascism, however the inferior handle their "pecking order". It is one thing born knowing you are empty and unknowing but to lie to yourself and call it creativity is what some would refer to as emotion, whereas I would say it is hubris.

    4. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this, I don't even.

    5. Re:Properly traine software testers by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I don't even that this is autism. I think its asbergers.

      The way you're saying that, it doesn't really make any sense. Think of it like a line between "normal" and (stereotypical) autism. Asperger syndrome is somewhere between them.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum

    6. Re:Properly traine software testers by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can train someone to be a good software tester, but it is so mind-numbingly boring that most people loose focus eventually, take shortcuts and miss those edge cases that is the whole point of software testing.

      I guess they are saying that people with Autism have a capacity for detailed, repetitive work that far exceeds regular people.

    7. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do well at software testing. That's really the story here. Autism is irreverent. This very idea is based upon a lot of wrong information about people with Autism.

      I actually have the gift of Asperger's syndrome, and can safely say, the only programmer I've met in my life (of thousands) who has skills comparable to my own, also had Asperger's (though I didn't learn of that until years after knowing him). I would definitely say Asperger's and Autism aren't even close to one another beyond how much of your life is lived though transforming thoughts (massively introspective thinking relative to others). Asperger's is a stable union of the introspective thought and the ability to interact with others to a manageable degree - for programming it's an unbeatable asset, don't know why these people would confine such valuable talent to the role of testers.

    8. Re:Properly traine software testers by Diamonddavej · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Autism is not irrelevant. Cognitive style of autism can be positively used in employment, once a workplace understands autism's specific strengths. The most salient features are Weak Central Coherence and Need for Routine. If workplace adapts to the autistic cognitive style, everyone will benefit. There is too much focus on deficits rather then splinter skills and cognitive strengths.

      Weak Central Coherence - means autistic people are detail obsessed, they observe smallest parts and elements of the environment, and construct the overall picture from individual parts. This is ideal for identifying and spotting anomalies in software, identifying mistakes, dealing with information. For example, it's been known for years that autistic people are far superior in locating hidden features in the Embedded Figures Test.

      Need for Routine - repetitive and otherwise boring tasks are soothing, enjoyed and relaxing. Furthermore, attention is not lost nor mistakes made, when autistic person is engaged in repetitive tasks.

    9. Re:Properly traine software testers by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make you a genius, but it does make you valuable in certain fields. The cytotechnologists who review Pap smears and kick all the remotely abnormal ones to a pathologist are people with a desire to do a repetitive job requiring attention to detail. Accountants, too.

    10. Re:Properly traine software testers by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Autism is irreverent.

      Man, I don't go in for formality either, but I don't think autism is any more irreverent than any other disease. ~

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:Properly traine software testers by internettoughguy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you just failed the Turing test.

    12. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it Darth's and Droids that pointed out that the only way we'll ever know that true geeks have taken over Hollywood is when the hero of every movie is short, ugly, illiterate, and has bad breath to compensate for his clearly above-starting-character level of mysteriously well coordinated skills?

    13. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the word you were looking for is "irrelevant."

    14. Re:Properly traine software testers by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      This very idea is based upon a lot of wrong information about people with Autism.

      Well, it probably does depend on the kind of autism someone has.

    15. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? and you would know something about Autism? or SW Testing? Fact is that a high number for folks WHO ALREADY work as SW Engineers/tester are Asbergers or on the spectrum. This gives them qualities that make them difficult to work with, but potentially exceptional at SW Testing. For more severe cases it doesn't work as the rigidities or sensitivities/other aspect will overwhelm them. They also need to be high functioning. You do have to alter your expectations and the typical management techniques need a bit of specialization.

    16. Re:Properly traine software testers by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Because people with worse conditions physically cannot interact properly with other people to find that skill you talk about.

      But I have to admit, Asperger's kids love checklists, predictability. They typically have higher IQs that put them as "gifted" until the "dealing with people" factor kicks in.

      Personally, I think there are a LOT of accountants and engineers out there with milder versions of the disorder. They have hit a "ceiling" in their jobs because they can't get over the people skills. The aerospace industry of the 70's and 80's with armies of "heads down" engineering and drafting departments would have had high rates of Asperger's if they tested it then. The movie "Falling Down" is like a poster for how Asperger kids/adults feel every day (if a bit sensational)

      Like so many other things since the 90's, all these jobs that have removed layers of management that used to insulate a lot of these people that are perfectly functional otherwise. School and work has become all about a much more "forward" teamwork... Less toleration of the guys you just kept in the office and fed work to all day.

      My opinion is that it is a BREED trait because even 50 years ago lots of people lived in the country and men did work that required all sorts of skills... Planting, tending animals, fixing stuff, etc. As a kid you were just expected to wander around and "pick it up". Your "Maker" from the 1970's is now "anti-social weird kid" and don't have the "free range" options to do stupid crap like we did 30 years ago.. Somebody is always "worried about" kids playing with stuff they're not supposed to... "Phines an Pherb" crack jokes about that shift all the time.

    17. Re:Properly traine software testers by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      It's not a disease.
      A disease can be cured.

      This is a personality type which happens to have trouble with a lot of things normal people take for granted while being strong in other aspects which may or may not be helpful.

    18. Re:Properly traine software testers by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      Which is what psychologists say as well.

    19. Re:Properly traine software testers by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      Aspergers have normal average level of intelligence but unevenly distributed.

      That is actually the prime distuingishing factor from high-functioning autism.

    20. Re:Properly traine software testers by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I think that a common pair of parents is the "engineer-schoolteacher" combo. Both groups that attract higher intelligences, both groups that attract list, detail, slightly socially reserved people. I think the combo brings out the effect more because they tend to be "by the numbers" type parents, but not overly touchy-feely. They have all the things around for the child to display the higher intelligence... But they miss the signs that the child's not acting and responding like a KID should. We tend to not worry about social interactions, or most kids only interact with adults, until kids go to school.. At which point you missed a chance to start therapy to adapt.

    21. Re:Properly traine software testers by Permutation+Citizen · · Score: 2

      Software testing is not boring. Most people ignore or don't understand what is software testing. They just think it's just about using a software following a given written scenario (the test case). That's only a small part of the job, and when it's repetitive you have to automate it.

    22. Re:Properly traine software testers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe his social development has been stunted because his parents have kept him inside practicing the piano for his entire childhood.

    23. Re:Properly traine software testers by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      Wooooooosh!

    24. Re:Properly traine software testers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I would point out that even for somebody with asperger's, religion can provide an experimental test bed for objective testing of moral rules. Which is why I like reading about the older religions, they've had more time to experiment, and thus reject moral hypothesis that do not work for human survival in the long term.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    25. Re:Properly traine software testers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      " The movie "Falling Down" is like a poster for how Asperger kids/adults feel every day (if a bit sensational)"

      Yes, but most of us, by age 25 or 26, learn enough coping skills to keep the violent meltdowns at bay (at least for the most part). Doesn't mean I don't fantasize about finding a nice tall tree in Forest Park and shooting towers in Portland, however.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    26. Re:Properly traine software testers by malacandrian · · Score: 1

      As a software tester on the autistic spectrum I can say that there's a large amount of truth in what you're saying: it's not some free path to genius and acclaim, however the eye for detail and precision that autistics tend to present is incredibly useful in the field. I spend a lot of my time looking through large sets of data searching for patterns, order, and more importantly differences to the norm; the specific way my brain is wired helps me immensely.

    27. Re:Properly traine software testers by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

      The term "spectrum" is a bit misleading and gives the impression of being one-dimensional, like an "autism score from 0-100". The very page you've linked to shows it's a bit more multi-dimensional than that. Essentially, there's a collection of different symptoms (say, ABCDE), and if you've got some of them, you have a Pervasive Development Disorder (PDD). If you've got ALL of them (ABCDE) you've got a really bad case of utterly low-functioning autism, but that's fantastically rare. If you've got ABC but no problem with D or E you might have Asperger's syndrome, if you've got ADE you might have "HFA", if you've got some other combination they'll just call it "PDD-NOS", which is a kinda catch-all for "other"... Never mind even more complicated things like "A and B and a bit of occasional D and E" which you might find in typical testing.

      Back to the "autism score from 0-100", one sufferer's 50% might be precisely the opposite 50% to someone else's 50%, showing a totally different set of symptoms out of the "whole set", they'd be good at different things, bad at different things, and need to accommodated in fairly different ways

      "It's complicated" :-(

      --
      Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
  4. "I thought what I'd do was..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this an episode of Ghost in the Shell?

  5. and alot of companies don't do much testing at all by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Now out side debuggers / testers do have there up's and downs but at times having ones that are in the same place as the people doing the coding is better with less trun around time.

    Now I hope that they are being payed for the long hours with full over time pay.

  6. Tv interview with verizon in Louvain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.deredactie.be/permalink/1.1086311 if you speak Dutch, since they advertised in the local paper for people with autism.

  7. So that explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought those QA folks were special.

  8. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What.. what language are you typing in? It *looks* like english but I actually stroked three times trying to make sense of it.

  9. sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have asperger.. I'm glad that there's more & more peeps who see that its not a disability; but rather a unique way of looking at the world.

    Its really not the same worldpicture you 'normals' see... I can really get upset if i see 'wrongs' in this world. Just as i feel in a way that it's the same as seeing 'wrongs' in software or hardware. I wont be able to put it behind me; or just to buy something to make me feel good... Or just accept that my boss says its the rigth thing; or that there's no money or something 'reasonable' like that.

    You talk about training.. Its not training; its in the core being who you are. Are you dedicated enough to spend ALL your energy (&that's the same amount of energy that you have) in trying to get the job done.. to find ALL the things that are wrong with something? (& not be at home spending time on your cat/girl/man/car/career/whatever).

    Peeps who have the same as i have, generally can focus ALL of their attention to the project they are dedicated to. Totally emerce yourself in a project; even if it takes longer than you think; even if it means skipping a few days of sleep..

    I'm sure you are a dedicated individual; that has the ability to do his/her job right.. But i generally don't see the (not negatively meant) singlemindedness/focus i can put in something that interest me.

    I can see that there are cases that let Asperger's syndrome be an advantage (the same way as i have seen it being a disadvantage in my life sometimes) when checking out something.

    Too bad you dismiss it as irrelevant. Maybe someday in the future you will understand the pro's and cons of someone with asperger.

    I'm glad my current employer understands... I do know she's happy that i'm there; even though i sometimes do things 'normals' dont expect, or do. & sometimes i cost more of her energy..

    I also know that i've saved the company a lot of resources just because i happen to think 'out of the box' & do things my way; not the way peeps expect you to be/perform.

    1. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      You sir talk a lot for an aspie.....

    2. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Your Asperger's apparently does not extend to grammar or punctuation.

    3. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Sparx139 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Online essays don't necessarily point either way -- my text messages often span over 3 messages (diagnosed nearly 5 years ago, had plenty of time to deal with the symptoms), and I've read about a high-functioning autistic guy who's one of the best speechwriters in America (Send in the Idiots, a short book if anyone is interested). Check out some of the posts over at wrongplanet some time if you don't believe me; sitting behind a screen makes it a lot easier to communicate, as one can think about what they want to say and take their time with it. Also, there's nothing like body language to compound the difficulty of communicating.

      --
      Our culture doesn't get smarter, it just finds new ways of being retarded.
    4. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Actually, learning to leave mistakes in writing and "just write" is a big part of coping as a kid. I'd bet the GP that typed that could tell you every typo in the post. From memory. Getting past the errors is what Asperger's kids in particular cannot get over. They have mini panic attacks over every little mistake. It looks like ADD because they cannot process past life's little hiccups and retreat to something routine and familiar, like meaningless facts.

    5. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      How old were you when you were diagnosed?

    6. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Its really not the same worldpicture you 'normals' see..

      There is no such thing as a "normal" view of the world. People with Asperger's just use it as an excuse for not trying at the things the rest of us have to do (like being civil to other people).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Actually, learning to leave mistakes in writing and "just write" is a big part of coping as a kid. I'd bet the GP that typed that could tell you every typo in the post. From memory. Getting past the errors is what Asperger's kids in particular cannot get over. They have mini panic attacks over every little mistake. It looks like ADD because they cannot process past life's little hiccups and retreat to something routine and familiar, like meaningless facts.

      Ah, I see, so people with Asperger's force themselves to leave in mistakes? How about if they don't make any, do they have to go back and put a couple in so they don't panic?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As one with AS, I can comment on this. We do have to learn to 'fit in' if we are going to survive in the neurotypical world. When I first began to text I spent many minutes reading and correcting my texts before sending. I always used proper punctuation and never abbreviated (BTW, OMG, ect) It took some growth for me to learn that I was inefficient with my texting time, when others typically did not do that. Often emails I receive say "pardon the typos, I did this from my phone." This revealed to me that others simply do not spend a lot of time checking and editing their work, and I needed to change to become more efficient, and more neurotypical.

      The hardest part once someone with AS learns another way of doing things, is to know when to apply that knowledge. I could easily imagine someone with AS learning to allow typos and abbreviations and then writing a business letter as though it's a facebook message. People with AS are often told that we don't have 'common sense' but really it's that our brains don't work in the same way others do and it makes problem solving interesting some times (in good and bad ways.) We are rule oriented and when told that rule doesn't apply in some circumstances, it may be difficult to learn how to differentiate those times. I'm not making that assumption about this poster, and it's pretty inconsiderate to point the typos out, as it sounds combative. However, this has been an interesting discussion, I'm enjoying the comments. Sarah T in Houston TX

    9. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      However- getting to that level makes losing a job feel like a divorce.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Most Aspies talk a lot if you get them on a subject that they're interested in, because they don't have the body language reading ability to know when you're bored out of your skull.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's more so that the NTs don't panic. "Always leave an error in for the tester to find".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:sure.. dismiss the uniqueness of aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, learning to leave mistakes in writing and "just write" is a big part of coping as a kid. I'd bet the GP that typed that could tell you every typo in the post. From memory. Getting past the errors is what Asperger's kids in particular cannot get over. They have mini panic attacks over every little mistake. It looks like ADD because they cannot process past life's little hiccups and retreat to something routine and familiar, like meaningless facts.

      It looks like a case of AssBurgers.

      I don't know if someone professioinal diagnosed you, or you did it your self, but your description of Aspergers' symptoms looks more like a new horoscope sign.

      You can take all your energy into a project? OMG, that is so unique! Other people are incapable of being interested in things.

  10. Re:Aspergers / Autism by digitig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it's over-self-diagnosed, but there's a proper clinical diagnosis, and it's a serious condition. The person with Asperger's does have significant strengths, though, and they tend to align with technology skills, so there's no real surprise here to those who know about Aperger's.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  11. Obvious things obvious by n30na · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I'm pretty sure Autism traits are just generally valuable in many programming and computer related situations, and it is not at all uncommon for engineers to have some basic Autistic traits. I kinda thought this was common knowledge.

    Still, it's nice seeing an effort to integrate some of those have have more social issues into productive jobs.

  12. Not so sure about that by msobkow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Asperger's is a mild form of autism. One of it's characteristics is that the people who have it focus very intently on what they're doing for extended periods of time. As a result, they make excellent programmers and testers because they'll put in hours without even realizing the time has gone by.

    In a sense, Asperger's is almost the reverse of ADD.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Not so sure about that by Andtalath · · Score: 2

      The interesting thing is that it's common to have both.

    2. Re:Not so sure about that by MarkRose · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't say it's the reverse. They're more like expressions of the same thing. With ADD, attention is side tracked in many different ways. With Asperger's Syndrome, the attention is stuck on a few special interests. That can work fantastically well if the aspie finds the topic at hand interesting, but can be fantastically awful if the topic is uninteresting. Myself, I have a great deal of trouble focusing on anything I'm not interested in and usually find my thinking returning to my special interest de jour. One trick I use when faced with a boring task is to find a clever or more optimal way to do it, since that challenge can make it more interesting. In either case, the challenge is what makes it easy for me to get in the zone and work at something for hours, but being interrupted while in the zone is frustrating and I'll usually avoid getting in the zone if I'm likely to be interrupted within an hour or two and my output will be low. I often wonder what it's like to be "normal" and to be able to get stuff done while only being half focused (not in the zone).

      --
      Be relentless!
    3. Re:Not so sure about that by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      An off-topic question:

      In your comment, you used the word "aspie", which I've heard a few times before. Is it appropriate for folks who are not autistic to use the term, or is it similar to use of the "N-word" by some black folk?

      Just curious :)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Not so sure about that by sosume · · Score: 1

      The term 'aspie' refers to someone presumably diagnosed with the Asperger syndrome. Most visitors here would fit that description.

    5. Re:Not so sure about that by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know. My question was whether it was only appropriate for persons with Asperger's syndrome to use the term, much like it is now somewhat only appropriate for black people to use the word "nigger".

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:Not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often wonder what it's like to be "normal" and to be able to get stuff done while only being half focused (not in the zone).

      What you just described in your lengthy reply is that it is like to be "normal".
      Nobody gets anything done while being only half focused.

    7. Re:Not so sure about that by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know. My question was whether it was only appropriate for persons with Asperger's syndrome to use the term, much like it is now somewhat only appropriate for black people to use the word "nigger".

      I guess so. If others around me call me an "aspie", it bothers the crap out of me. I just hate the term, not because of what it means, but because of the sound of the word. I know, I know. I'm weird. I hate the word "inappropriate", as well. It's because it was overused on me when I was in school. Call me a bad kid or a jerk that isn't following the rules all you want, but don't call me a repetitively used term that isn't necessarily true -OR- fitting of the components.

      If someone else wants to be called an "aspie", I grind my teeth when I say it, but application of the term to them doesn't matter. The person is whatever they want to be called as long as it isn't false.

      I only have ethical issues with calling people something that they aren't in order to get ahead in life or take advantage of others (e.g. a moron who calls themself "genius" or or a genius that calls themself a "moron").

      If you wanna call me "white stuffy-nosed English-German-American Indian mix boy", go for it. It's what I am. lol

    8. Re:Not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So called "normal people " can get distracted too and can sometimes not complete the task at hand either. It happens to all of us. The difference is that we do not get as agitated or upset as much. We only worry if it a project our boss wants that day!

    9. Re:Not so sure about that by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      I often wonder what it's like to be "normal" and to be able to get stuff done while only being half focused (not in the zone).

      What you just described in your lengthy reply is that it is like to be "normal". Nobody gets anything done while being only half focused.

      Yep. Paying more attention to things you're interested in is neuro-typical behavior.

    10. Re:Not so sure about that by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is that it's common to have both.

      The really interesting thing is that parents can ignore the cognitive dissonance of accepting that their precious snowflake can lurch between having autism and the ability to spend twelve hours staring at a ame of minecraft because they enjoy it, and ADD where they can't sit still and read a book for five minutes because they don't enjoy reading.,

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Not so sure about that by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, in real life, people have to do a lot of uninteresting stuff. It's called being an adult.

      It may come as a surprise, but most people would love to be able to sit down uninterrupted and get "in the zone" but in reality thereare children, co-workers,bosses, customers and so on.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Not so sure about that by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The term 'aspie' refers to someone presumably diagnosed with the Asperger syndrome. Most visitors here would fit that description.

      Self -diagnosed normally.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Not so sure about that by dragmar · · Score: 1

      As a parent of a child who has been professionally diagnosed with ADD and Ausberger's Syndrome, I agree they compliment one another. "With Asperger's Syndrome, the attention is stuck on a few special interests. That can work fantastically well if the aspie finds the topic at hand interesting, but can be fantastically awful if the topic is uninteresting" I could not agree more

    14. Re:Not so sure about that by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and people should just turn that frown upside-down and get on with things! And people who suffer traumatic events should just gosh-darn get over it and move on with their life.

      It's good to see that mental health problems are nothing more than childish behaviour!

    15. Re:Not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe in these instances the diagnosis is incorrect, or the diagnosed subject is merely misunderstood. Doctors and parents may see someone unable to focus on a particular task as ADD/ADHD, when it reality the subject is just totally disinterested in the task being thrown at them. Give them a task they enjoy and watch the ADD label melt away.

    16. Re:Not so sure about that by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The autistic equivalent of Nigger is "Neurotypical". Most autistics realize that social skills are hard, but the lack of social skills makes us far better than NTs at other stuff.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    17. Re:Not so sure about that by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Then you should at least Know how to spell Aspergers- and know what an insult it is putting a b in it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:Not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you pushed one of my buttons, so hear goes. I've never heard a person of color use the word "nigger" in reference to one of their group, I have heard many use the word "nigga". Listen closely and I think you'll hear the difference and I consider them to be two different words. Although it would be inappropriate for a someone who is not a person of color to use either of them.

    19. Re:Not so sure about that by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I much prefer the term aspie to aspergian. Some kind of shorthand must be used in lieu of "a person afflicted with Asperger's Syndrome." I would not be offended if someone used the term aspie at all. As the thread has shown, others may be. I think a lot depends on context. If someone is trolling, then yes, it can be derogatory, but my own default feelings about the term are positive.

      --
      Be relentless!
    20. Re:Not so sure about that by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Yep. Paying more attention to things you're interested in is neuro-typical behavior.

      Certainly. The difference is degree. Everyone gets happy and sad, but too much is the essence of bipolar disorder.

      I suppose I assume most people can focus largely at will. Based on my observations of others, I tend to have a lot more difficulty in getting focused on something, but when I do, my focus is far more intense (and I'm far more productive). I merely wish it were more consistent, like it appears to me like it is for others. Second to lacking an innate social intuition from having AS, my inconsistent ability to get focused is certainly the thing that affects me most (whether it's from having AS or not).

      --
      Be relentless!
    21. Re:Not so sure about that by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      There's more to Asperger's than just a degree of obsession and a lack of social skills. If that's all you have, you're not autistic, you're just a nerd. I don't know your situation, but if you have not yet been diagnosed, do not claim AS. Having met people that actually have AS, and having met tons of people who claim to have AS because they think it helps explain why they're socially awkward and obsessed with computers, I can tell you the difference is night and day.

    22. Re:Not so sure about that by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Agreed with MarkRose, I don't see it as an attack like the N-word would be. It is a descriptive word that happens to describe me.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    23. Re:Not so sure about that by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I would say, as an Aspie, that it is absolutely the degree. When I am focused on something, it is near impossible to get me sidetracked. When I am having trouble focusing on something, it doesn't get done.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    24. Re:Not so sure about that by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      I would say, as an Aspie, that it is absolutely the degree. When I am focused on something, it is near impossible to get me sidetracked. When I am having trouble focusing on something, it doesn't get done.

      Again, this applies to many, many people. In fact, I'd say it applies to almost any knowledge worker. You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

    25. Re:Not so sure about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aspergers and classical autism both have the same diagnostic criteria. One is not 'milder' on the spectrum than the other and both can be very debilitating (eg. there are plenty of Aspies in special schools).

  13. Re:Aspergers / Autism by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    Aspergers typically even has a distinctive gait, so it isn't as easy to claim as some non-specific "borderline autism" claim that is more likely bogus.

    And in their defense, they're still dorks either way.

  14. Re:Aspergers / Autism by Z34107 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The most over-self-diagnosed conditions on the planet, thanks to the perceived ability to explain social awkwardness and claim a special area of brilliance.

    That, and taking Aspergers frees up stat points for you to allocate elsewhere.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  15. Welcome to genetic specialization of humanity by Prune · · Score: 1

    The title says it all. It's just a logical extension of division of labor, really. Forget the current reprogenetics tendencies and the development of genetic screening of embryos; in short order we'll be making better workers. I can just imagine the advertisements for workers with genes turned off for boredom for repetitive low skill tasks, soldiers with atrophied brain areas responsible for emotion, and all the other goodies. Welcome to the new utopia/dystopia (depending on whether you're an employer or employee).

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    1. Re:Welcome to genetic specialization of humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      genes turned off for boredom for repetitive low skill tasks, soldiers with atrophied brain areas responsible for emotion, and all the other goodies

      I guess I'm ahead of my time. My mind wanders during repetitive tasks so I don't get bored easily. I'm not very emotional, and I'm well endowed with "goodies" as you put it ;)

    2. Re:Welcome to genetic specialization of humanity by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      Oh blow it out your ass, the idea that a particular non-neurotypical mindset could be better suited to a particular suite of tasks does not mean that a Brave New World is right around the corner. This is talking about an inborn trait that science frankly doesn't know all that much about; not genetically engineering autistic traits into caste workers.

    3. Re:Welcome to genetic specialization of humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see you're living up to your nick, pops.

  16. Board is larger than the rest of the company? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Aspiritech's board of directors includes
    social service providers, (?)
    therapists, (?)
    a vocational expert (1)
    and a software engineer. (1)

    Aspiritech has hired and trained seven recruits with Asperger's syndrome. (7)

    Something is wrong with this picture.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Board is larger than the rest of the company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The board isn't necessarily full-time. The employees probably are.

    2. Re:Board is larger than the rest of the company? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      My son would take a LOT of work on social skills to "just work". But he would be VERY good at something like what is posted. Give him a clear checklist of expectations and good tools designed to stay on task and I could see him fitting that job.

      With the state of the job markets now, my kid would never survive the modern sociopath interview process to get that exact same work at a "normal" company.

  17. Pham Nuwen Would Not Approve by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, but this reminds me of focus from Vinge's A Deepness in the Sky.

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    1. Re:Pham Nuwen Would Not Approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, that was my first thought as well. Great book, that, I've never been disappointed with Vinge.

    2. Re:Pham Nuwen Would Not Approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what i thought!

    3. Re:Pham Nuwen Would Not Approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought that book was a metaphor for Methamphetamine. But yes it reminds me a lot, and gives me the creeps.
      Tough call though - its not like they are *making* people autistic so they can body-shop them out ...

      yet ...

      But when will the day come that you cant get a decent programming job unless you can provide your clinical papers certifying your autism.

    4. Re:Pham Nuwen Would Not Approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's just you. Odd thing for you to focus on, but whatever...

    5. Re:Pham Nuwen Would Not Approve by Geminii · · Score: 1

      There are definite similarities, to the point that I wonder if Vinge was only slightly exaggerating the "in the zone" focus known to people who really get into their work while hours slip by. Artists, programmers, people who build toothpick replicas of battleships - it can happen to almost anyone.

  18. Re:Aspergers / Autism by NixieBunny · · Score: 2

    Condition? I (and a lot of leading Asperger's advocates) think it's more a type of brain than a condition. I was in the waiting room one day while my son was in an Asperger's class, and noticed that three of us dads were discussing the nature of human consciousness. Not your standard dad discussion. Point being, we're a breed apart from the 'regular' dads.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
  19. Dad lets me test code on the driveway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...But not on Monday, definitely not on Monday. I'm an excellent tester...

    Uh oh, fart.

  20. Dad lets me drive slow on the driveway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...But not on Monday, definitely not on Monday. I'm an excellent driver...

    Uh oh, fart.

  21. Train? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have asperger's syndrome, and I need no training for computers, I just learn about them. I learned PHP, C# C++, and Java at 13 (or was it earlier), and written my own cms using PHP and SQL. At 14 I started using MongoDB, for its usefulness in a cms.

    1. Re:Train? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Asperger's syndrome is not Autism. As for it being in the "spectrum" that is unproven; just because some outward traits overlap on the edge of both doesn't mean that they are indeed connected. Eventually it may be proven one is genetic and the other is biological or partially developmental. The connection between the two may not exist or it may be weak; but we must lump the whole group into 1 area for some reason. Perhaps it is because normal people are not that smart? Its one thing to not care about a subject and its another to over simplify it and perpetuate that.

    2. Re:Train? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      It's on the spectrum because modern understanding of Autism is more about the part of the head that interacts, mimics, copies, predicts what other people do seems to be broken. As they understand Autism, it is a separate thing from retardation. Most Autistic kids have reasonable normal IQs... The thing that automagically learns language, mannerisms, facial expressions is broken.

      Asperger's kids share that link because they can only interact with what is spelled out.. Teasing about childish things becomes severe because they mentally think something is VERY wrong.. They are INCAPABLE of "getting the joke". The opposite is also true. They get fixated on something different about somebody and that "dog with a bone" reflex kicks in and the cannot understand that their inquiries hurt other people's feelings.

    3. Re:Train? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      When were you diagnosed? I learned C when I was 11, wrote video games in C at 12, hacked assembly at 14, and got a life at 15. My point is that, if your basis for belief in your "aspie-ness" is self diagnosed attention to detail and social awkwardness, then you might just be socially awkward and have a lot of attention for detail.

    4. Re:Train? by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      There's no definitive cause of *anything* on the Autism spectrum. They're linked by symptoms, because it's a useful diagnostic tool.

    5. Re:Train? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Kid. I started out with 40 different dialects of basic and three different processors of assembly. And wrote my own word processor at age 13, with spell check, in a version of basic that didn't even have fonts.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Train? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I was diagnosed at 30- and fit your definition better.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  22. Re:Aspergers / Autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A different type of brain would certainly be a condition of sorts.

  23. High functioning by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    By specifically using high functioning autistic people, you are already making the exemption that invalidates the whole concept. High functioning means that they can more or less function in a normal environment, doing normal work and living a normal work. Over 10% of the IT workforce I've been in the last 10 years, has been high functioning autistic people, including administrators, DBAs, penetration testers, indeed software testers, and even a team leader. Come back when you can use every "rain man" offered to you in your company and I'll start thinking you have done something out of the ordinary.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:High functioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now where is my clue stick.... "you are already making the exemption that invalidates the whole concept". No it doesn't. "High functioning" is NOT related to or imply equivalency to typical peers ( the "normal' folks). It's simply an artificial designation that they can function without a lot of help relative to others on the spectrum. the peers you talk of are Asbergers VERY high function and most like NEVER diagnosed. You wouln't even freaking know it unless you had some training or had been around them.

      Fact is there are very few true savants - "Rain man" - and they usually have other 'disabilitiies that may make it difficult to use them or even fit in.

      There are MANY folks with the type of sensitivities / rigidities that are potentially perfect - IFF targeted properly. some diagnosed and others NOT. They most likely will never be like typical peers but given the proper nurturing and empathetic environment, can go on to contribute and have a rewarding life rather than be a burden to their families and society.

      open your mind

    2. Re:High functioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is true, there's a large number of so called high functioning autistics in the IT field, likely many haven't even been diagnosed. This does not mean that the company is remiss in their information. After all, low functioning autistics are typically deemed so by their lack of communication skills. While they may very well be able to find bugs in systems, communication in the work place is also extremely important. If they can communicate via the written word (on the computer) then they may still be valuable to the project, but often neurotypicals see those of us who can type as high functioning. Many can't seem to understand that low functioning autism does not equal mental retardation. An important thing to note in this article is that although Aspiritech http://www.aspiritech.org/ is an organization that helps high functioning autistics, they would likely take anyone who could function on a level well enough to work. This does not include all HFA/AS adults. I know many who just simply cannot hold down a job no matter how tailored it is to their skill set and functioning level. This is why the term "high functioning" is so limited in it's actual meaning, in reality it's probably a misnomer. One may be high functioning in social activities/relationships but very low functioning in other areas. One may be high functioning in most areas but has such a deficit in social relations that they could only work in a closet space with no interaction other then via occasional email. It's quite understandable that they classify their services to HFA/AS, though, and insulting to those of us on the autism spectrum for this article to be dismissed as unimportant until "rain man" can be used for such a task. And actually, "Rain Man" is considered high functioning by some standards. Sarah T in Houston TX

  24. Apparently they've decided on the salary by ross.w · · Score: 1

    It's about a hundred dollars...

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    1. Re:Apparently they've decided on the salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? salary in which country and for how long, is it $100 per issue found?

  25. Fixed that for you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Science never shows that some hypothesis is correct.

    It's called falisfiability and falsification and without it our science simply isn't.
    Ref.: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Falsifiability

    Yes it's overly strict, and on purpose, because so many people including "scientists" and "people who believe in science" just don't get it at all. The good thing is that they're all actually smart enough to get it if they're made aware of it (the wikipedia article isn't good since it doesn't point out how one would need absolute 'total knowledge' of _everything_ in order not to be strict and say "never", but it's a start).

    People who don't get it make the superficially reasonable conclusion that "almost entirely certainly correct" can be treated as "proven"; the problem arises when they in practice go from "can" to "should" which they almost always do due to our human nature and which in short order easily sabotages the very concepts that define science including the scientific method.

    That flaw is the root cause of the huge issues in pharmacology and medical science that has rendered much research/attempted research worthless and this situation has spread rather widely making inroads into other sciences making research generally untrustworthy even if peer reviewed and even if incorrectly repeated (not uncommon when a mistaken assumption becomes the norm) so it's an important, serious, and dangerous issue.

    1. Re:Fixed that for you.. by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now, I don't like such absolutes as "never", because they're so... absolute. It's fully possible to, while following the scientific method perfectly, prove a hypothesis correct. It just takes a very particular kind of hypothesis, and a very particular kind of experiment.

      As an example, consider the hypothesis that of Foo, Bar, and Baz, Foo is the most quiggle. This hypothesis can indeed be proven correct, but only by testing every possibility, which of course results in proving other hypotheses wrong.

      As for the fields of pharmacology and medical science, your complaint of worthless research seems to be based on the assumption that only perfect knowledge is worthwhile. Quite the contrary, actually: Medical treatments can be effective even if we don't know why. The pain-relieving quality of willow bark was known 2300 years before its pharmacological mechanism was understood. Research into new treatments is very valuable, even without full understanding of the mechanisms involved. Of course such knowledge is preferred, but that's another several years of research after the initial findings.

      The only "huge issue" I see with pharmacology and medical science is that they're so intently watched by the media and "science fans" for any sign of a coming miracle cure, in the constant hunt for headlines. Any finding of anything affecting any kind of cancer cells is reported as a "potential cure". In the actual research paper, the findings are almost always stated exactly as they should be: some indications, little concrete evidence, and suggestions for further avenues of research. Other sciences are picking up this attention, as well, but still usually maintain their integrity. Electrical engineering hits the news whenever some transparent, tiny, or shiny prototype finally works. Psychologists are asked for comment when there's a serial killer running amok. Sociology has its fifteen minutes of fame when there's some new theory to explain 4chan. Disease is just constantly affecting millions of people, so it's always interesting news.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Fixed that for you.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      That kind of thinking is how we got the ether theory of the 1800s. By investigating every possibility, you inherently assume you have enumerated every possibility, which is not a valid assumption to make outside of a purely mathematical model.

    3. Re:Fixed that for you.. by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Hence why it's only applicable to hypotheses where "every possibility" is a well-defined finite set.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:Fixed that for you.. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      But ether is what my nets run on...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  26. Asperger's Syndrome? by Krokus · · Score: 1

    "Aspiritech has hired and trained seven recruits with Asperger's syndrome."

    I thought everybody had Asperger's these days.

    1. Re:Asperger's Syndrome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Aspiritech has hired and trained seven recruits with Asperger's syndrome."

      I thought everybody had Asperger's these days.

      That was back in the 80s - 90s. These days, you have whatever promotes the sale of the medication that the "doctor" gets the most under-the-table perks or free "donations" from.

  27. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice honeypot for autistic grammar nazis, dude.

  28. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    I would say that testing your own code is the worst thing to do, as you know how it works and will (possibly subconsciously) input data which will either work, or bomb out gracefully. By all means to some quick debugging yourself, but you need fresh eyes to test your system properly.

    It just so happens that aspies seem to perform this task remarkably well.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  29. Good at software testing bad at communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a autistic guy on our development team, great at analysing complex problems and finding the root cause. Terrible at communicating that knowledge to others. Very challenging to work with at times takes a lot of managing.

  30. Odd by koan · · Score: 1

    Maybe evolution is one step ahead on this one.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  31. Testing by lloy0076 · · Score: 1

    Autism helps testing:

    1. You don't mind repeating your testing
    2. You read the specifications and the code, you miss no tittle, not jot, you dot the letter i, each and every one; it's a side effect of autism
    3. You don't read emotion from the developers at all and read their code and specifications without it. This is tremendously valuable because you don't make any assumptions about their code (as an a "aspy" I'm always asking developers is THAT what you really meant). As an aspy we know damn well most NTs don't actually mean exactly what they say - so we either apply it and show that the literal application is BUNK or we ask for clarification.
    4. If testing is our 'obsession' then we'll do it well, you won't stop us. Aspys are known for doing specific jobs tremendously well and testing is just another example of a specific job.

    The other thing, though, that will probably upset developers is that the good developers are generally SO autistic it's not funny. When one realises one is autistic it helps to communicate with other autistic people. The best thing is -- you can fairly well say what you damn well mean and it won't upset them...

    DSL

    1. Re:Testing by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Amen on all of that.

      I have something to add on #3, though:

      3. You don't read emotion from the developers at all and read their code and specifications without it. This is tremendously valuable because you don't make any assumptions about their code (as an a "aspy" I'm always asking developers is THAT what you really meant). As an aspy we know damn well most NTs don't actually mean exactly what they say - so we either apply it and show that the literal application is BUNK or we ask for clarification.

      What has been the bane of my existence at most places of work is most peoples' inability to tolerate that. They always want things understood exactly as it comes out of their mouth, no questions, no alternatives. Just crystal clear.

      Yeah, that doesn't happen. The alternative is that if they do answer questions and you -do- eventually find the true meaning or statement, their anger levels go up. Since I have the ability to read body language very well (lack of friends as a kid), I can talk with people and sense when their level of anger rises (before it's even a problem). Then, I know I'm getting closer to the "truth" or "heart of the issue". Truth hurts, apparently, but it makes me perfectly happy.

      Call me a weirdo that doesn't communicate like all the others or look hot to girls and I'll say, "Yep! That's me!" - no offense taken. Truth is truth :)

  32. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I would say that testing your own code is the worst thing to do, as you know how it works and will (possibly subconsciously) input data which will either work, or bomb out gracefully. By all means to some quick debugging yourself, but you need fresh eyes to test your system properly.

    It just so happens that aspies seem to perform this task remarkably well.

    I found a bug in a Java servlet at a fortune-500 company that a TEAM of over 50 software engineers spent MONTHS of time and hundreds of thousands of dollars in equipment to try and find it, in order to fix it. Really, they only allowed a memory leak to last longer until the garbage collect cycled into a non-stop loop.

    I found the bug in less than 5 minutes. Guess what happened to me after I found it? Anyone who didn't guess that I was "let go for mysterious reasons" doesn't have Asperger's ;)

  33. Talking to a dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he really did mean "irrelevant". It's just that you're talking to Scooby Doo.

  34. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

    I would say that testing your own code is the worst thing to do, as you know how it works and will (possibly subconsciously) input data which will either work, or bomb out gracefully.

    Testing your own code should *always* be the first step in the testing process. Ideally, stepping through it line by line. It's precisely because you know how it works that you are the best person to do this. Knowing it will soon be handed over to a testing team can help eliminate any inherent bias you may have, but even if it doesn't, it should increase the quality of code that is being tested later in the process.

  35. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    Indeed. By way of clarification: You should not be the only person to test your code.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  36. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overtime pay? Does anybody in the industry get that anymore?

  37. Re:Aspergers / Autism by tehcyder · · Score: 0

    Condition? I (and a lot of leading Asperger's advocates) think it's more a type of brain than a condition. I was in the waiting room one day while my son was in an Asperger's class, and noticed that three of us dads were discussing the nature of human consciousness. Not your standard dad discussion. Point being, we're a breed apart from the 'regular' dads.

    Wow, some middle-class, well-educated, bright and interested parents have children who perform less than brilliantly at school and in social activities, so they're diagnosed as having Asperger's. What a fucking surprise.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  38. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, it's like writing a book and then editing it yourself. You may be a fantastic editor otherwise, but when you spend so much time pouring over your own work, it's easy to miss errors.

    My husband works for cPanel and they have people hired specifically for debugging the system. You don't see Nick Koston spending all his time doing it.

    Hm, I wonder if they have seen this article? Sarah T in Houston TX

  39. Ass-burger by muppetman462 · · Score: 1

    And now this company is on the look out for Cartman burgers, and we all need Jameson Irish Whiskey to make it through the day....

  40. Logical Fallacies by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    You can’t disprove a negative statement.
            I can’t prove that vaccines don’t cause autism – there are exceptions.
            I can’t prove that unicorns don’t exist – They are shy.
    All we can say about both is that there is no positive proof about either.

  41. Re:Aspergers / Autism by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    And huge numbers of software engineers have proper clinical diagnosis. Yep, no surprise here, except maybe to the neurotypicals who thought they could program who are having Aspies debug their code.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  42. There are more Aspies than you think by johnwbyrd · · Score: 1

    Any engineering manager with a bit of history can tell you that the really, really, really good engineers for one highly narrow topical area -- say, for example, optimizing FFT transforms on an obscure ARM architecture variant -- tend to not be entirely normal human beings. In truth, many of what we consider to be brilliant asocial geeks are probably high-functioning autistic spectrum people.

  43. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Yep, I've experienced that myself. Makes for an awfully choppy and long resume.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  44. Since when does IT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone catch the last sentence? One benefit is "...providing a relaxed atmosphere that encourages the development of social skills." Since when did any job in IT become something that develops social skills?

  45. Re:and alot of companies don't do much testing at by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Now I hope that they are being payed for the long hours with full over time pay.

    I wish...unfortunately, many jobs in technical fields are exempt employees.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?