US Intelligence Mining Your Social Network Data
bs0d3 writes "U.S. Intelligence has hired social scientists to mine the vast resources of the Internet — Web searches and Twitter messages, Facebook and blog posts, the digital location trails generated by billions of cellphones. They intend to use this info to track sociological laws of human behavior — enabling them to predict political crises, revolutions and other forms of social and economic instability. Privacy advocates are deeply skeptical of the project, saying it reminds them of Total Information Awareness, a 9/11 Pentagon program that proposed hunting for potential attackers by identifying patterns in vast collections of public and private data: telephone calling records, e-mail, travel data, visa and passport information, and credit card transactions. In a recent budget proposal, the defense agency argues that its analysis can expose terrorist cells and other groups by tracking their meetings, rehearsals and sharing of material and money transfers."
So I purposely write posts knowing that they're doing it and designed to further any agenda *I* might have.
Occupy Wall Street everywhere in America!! :D
No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
He who mines my social network date mines garbage.
except my slashdot journals, which are pure gold as to the utter stinker I am
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
I am shocked, SHOCKED that this is happening! Who would have thought that the same people behind CARNIVORE and ECHELON would make such dastardly use of the vast quantities of publicly available information!
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
Some people are aware of this and are genuinely concerned. I'm probably going to get down-modded for this but as a concerned programmer, I made a website called truefriender specifically for this reason. I just have no idea how to tell everyone about it without sounding like a spam-bot. It is worthwhile to check out if you're concerned.
I think what you mean if its on the WORLD WIDE WEB, by definition it isnt private. The internet encompasses a vast amount of wholly private spaces.
Good-bye
So now I am not allowed to say "bomb" online? Bomb bomb bomb...bomb bomb bomb bomb!!
It's the government...they don't do anything efficiently, least of spend money. They hired people to research the technology, give reports, implement, and now they probably pay a bunch of people to actually sit around and gather the data and analyze it (after a computer does, of course). I'm sure I've left a lot of steps out, but you can bet your ass they spent a TON of money on it. I agree with you in theory, but let's get real: we're talking about the government here, not a rational, intelligent entity.
I'm too busy laughing hysterically at the very aspect that anyone thought this was "new" news in any way. What exactly do you think our intelligence agencies have been doing for a very long time now. I find it rather pathetic they had to hire "social scientists" to do this though...you would think they've had enough practice at data mining by now.
OK, now I'm laughing at the concept of a few million being handed to this group of "social scientists" who are busy right now watching YouTube videos on how to extract information from Facebook accounts...Oh, look! I think one of them just found the UK privacy law "loophole"...shortcut!
Typical US Government. They were supposed to order shirts, not coats.
upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
Everyone is mining your social network data.
Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
Who is the "Us" and who is the "Them"?
We get handed a box with two choices. Liberals or conservatives. Most of us choose a side and fight vehemently. We get all worked up. We call the other side evil and stupid.
But maybe we should question the box we're handed? Think beyond it?
Seriously, when you speak and do things in public, people are going to analyze you.
A friend of mine wrote an IRC bot to monitor channels and then derive information from it.
Later, I rewrote it with lessons learned included from the previous version.
By the time it was done, pretty much no one was capable of fooling the bot regardless of how you tried, it could identify any user any the channel based on about 20 to 30 sentences minimum of conversation with them, regardless of how they tried to fake their identity, (nick/host/server changes meant essentially nothing to the bot, and it was trained fairly well on detecting based on conversation after we got around 10 million lines of conversation or so recorded.
It was SIMPLE by any standard, and it was fun as shit to see new ways to pick out patterns in conversations, made it easy to find sleeper agents as well (bots or relays to others used for nefarious purposes). Sometimes lurking gives more information than talking ;)
Anyway, this isn't new, its just on a larger scale due to being able to computerize the process. People, ALL PEOPLE, do this very thing naturally all the time subconsciously, like it or not. We've evolved to constantly analyze events in our lives, especially people. Slashdot's Friend/Foe system? Same thing, except you give it direct feedback.
If you don't like people knowing something, don't tell them about, which you know, is kind of THE FUCKING POINT BEHIND SOCIAL NETWORKING. The whole damn concept behind these sites, and THEY TELL YOU WHEN YOU SIGN UP is to associate yourself and your actions with others like you and your associates. How do you think Facebook, MySpace and Google+ come up with 'new friends' ... ITS THE SAME DAMN THING.
The POINT of social networking is so that YOU and OTHERS can do this sort of thing SPECIFICALLY.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
Let's see the gov try and figure that one out.
Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
Actually efficiency is short term thinking. That is why we have research done and supported by the government because with all the MBA's out there no science or technology will get done because they want to make a profit this quarter and every quarter, and they will fire 10,000 scientists and researchers to make their numbers. So efficiency is not the grand god nor always the wisest philosophy.
But I think this work is scary and should be stopped on grounds that in a free society, freedom comes a the price of not only vigilance but also anonymity and privacy.
U.S. Intelligence has hired social scientists to mine the vast resources of the Internet
Just a point, stop calling them "social scientists", they are not scientists, and it degrades the value of hard science of myself and others here that went to university for.
Take Nobody's Word For It.
You might consider InQtel http://www.iqt.org/ and Visible Technologies http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/10/exclusive-us-spies-buy-stake-in-twitter-blog-monitoring-firm/, both which fit this article's description, and have had tons of CIA seed money put into them. We know the pentagon has a sock-puppet program, and whatever law prevent them from operating in the US can be bypassed through private contractors hence (perhaps) Fusion Centers. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fusion_center Both the FBI and DHS are quite busy here too. I frequently observe FBI, .mil, dhs.gov, DoD, and other government IPs visiting my website and subscribing to comments. Do a whois on my latest visitor: 153.31.113.26 ~~ And yeah, go right ahead and mod this as "troll" too. Bloody snobs!
Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck