Slashdot Mirror


Why So Many Crashes of Bee-Carrying Trucks?

Hugh Pickens writes "Interstate 15 in southern Utah has been reopened and officials say 25 million bees that closed the road have been accounted for after a flatbed truck heading for California carrying 460 beehives overturned near a construction zone. The bees were on their way to Bakersfield, California for almond pollination next spring. 'The driver lost control, hit the concrete barrier and rolled over,' says Corporal Todd Johnson with the Utah Highway Patrol. 'Of course we then had bees everywhere.' But a similar incident happened in July, when 14 million bees, as well as a river of honey, flowed out of a wrecked semi in Idaho; and 17 million bees escaped a fatal truck crash in Minnesota last year. Why so many highway accidents involving bees? The uptick results from more and more honey bee colonies being transported around the country via highways in recent years. Local bee populations are rapidly dying off from a little-understood disease called 'colony collapse disorder': 'The number of managed honey bee colonies [in the U.S.] has dropped from 5 million in the 1940s to only 2.5 million today,' says the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Unfortunately, some honey bee scientists suspect that the rise of migratory beekeeping may be contributing to the species' decline as transporting hives from farm to farm spreads pathogens to local bee populations."

255 comments

  1. Flight by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1

    With all the little hairy fellows flying around, the truck loses it's grip on the road.

    Maybe it's like that scene in Finding Nemo where all the fish swim in the same direction to break free of the net. Except it's the other way around.

    --
    I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    1. Re:Flight by Fusselwurm · · Score: 1

      Well, a bee weighs between 90 and 180mg, I'll just assume 100mg on average. That makes for a combined weight of 25M*0.1g = 2.5Mg = 2.5t

      When all 25 million bees take of, they reduce the lorry's weight by 2.5 tonnes? Whoa.

      But wait! The lorry is closed at the bottom, /me guesses. Air cant escape downward (maybe to the sides or upward?). -- So, no.
      No change in weight after all, as the downward pressure from their wings should equal their mass as they hover around

    2. Re:Flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the downward pressure from their wings should equal their mass

      One, learn what dimensional analysis is. Two, whoooooosh - and that wasn't a bee.

    3. Re:Flight by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Didn't some slashdotter confess to having developed UV-vision bee powers not too long ago?

      Have we ruled out the possibility that he is systematically eradicating the non-aligned colonies in order to cement his grip on power?

    4. Re:Flight by Fusselwurm · · Score: 1

      yah yah yah. you're right. I was in a hurry, and all the unit juggling I once knew is now *woosh* gone from my brain. feel free to add proper terms and units :D

    5. Re:Flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume the bees are shipped in AIR-TIGHT containers? That would pretty much rule out any of your other arguments, just by association.

      (Hint: Bees do breathe)

    6. Re:Flight by socz · · Score: 1

      hah funny! I think my significant other actually has this ability and she can always seem to see in almost complete darkness with ease, not only pulling clothes out of drawers but telling me which one she's grabbing! Its a little game we play :P

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    7. Re:Flight by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yuo need to rearrange their clothes while then sleep... or get your eyes checked!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Flight by socz · · Score: 1

      The point was not that they can guess what clothes they are, but rather she can tell me what color/patterns they have in darkness!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    9. Re:Flight by swalve · · Score: 1

      Naw, that's crazy talk. What the bees do is coordinate and all fly to the inside edge of the turn whenever the driver rounds a corner. Then, after the driver gets used to how his truck is handling, they wait for the next really good one and fly to the opposite edge. BAM! Instant rollover/freedom.

      There was once a colony that felt themselves particularly smart (proving that natural selection works mysteriously), and decided that they were going to vaporize the truck by beating their wings in sync with each other, and in time with the natural harmonic of the truck. Sadly, once they got going they quickly turned themselves into a sort of paste. There was actually one bee left alive, but it committed suicide.

  2. Goldfingerism by martijnd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action.

    1. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moscow rules.

    2. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action.

      Nope, Occam's razor - the truck drivers smoke crystal meth to stay up driving, and tweak out with a truckload of bees. Ultimately they either flip their truck over swatting at non-existent bees, or some very bad decisions lead to actual bees getting into the cab.

    3. Re:Goldfingerism by Magic5Ball · · Score: 2

      The important questions to ask are: What are the expected rates of accidents involving lorries? What has been the change in the number of bee lorrie miles travelled or bee lorrie hours on highways? and does this apparent cluster violate expectations based on those numbers?

      I would first guess that this is explained better by cognitive biases relating to our casual misunderstanding of statistics than by statistics on a handful of cases. This time last year, everyone thought there was a pattern when several mass bird deaths were both noticed and reported within a short period. However, there was no underlying cause or connection among them.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    4. Re:Goldfingerism by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Maybe a supervillain is attempting to corner the world's honey supply.

    5. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, William of Occam always introduced a random element of crystal meth smoking into his explanations, because "simple" just isn't good enough for that guy.

    6. Re:Goldfingerism by thomst · · Score: 1

      Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action.

      Er .. not a Goldfingerism. The quote is from Marc-Ange Draco, a Mafia don, and the father of Contessa Teresa di Vicenzo, Bond's love interest (and, briefly, spouse) in the novel On Her Majesty's Secret Service.

      "No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die." - Auric Goldfinger.

      --
      Check out my novel.
    7. Re:Goldfingerism by JustOK · · Score: 1

      But Occam never drove a truck, so how would he know?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    8. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's...

      Terrorism.
      We will need to promote legislation that limits citizen's rights. The honey must flow.

    9. Re:Goldfingerism by JustOK · · Score: 1

      How many trucks carrying Safe Driving instruction manuals crashed?
      And the bird deaths are still happening: thousands of birds wash up along Georgian Bay

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    10. Re:Goldfingerism by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action

      I guess nobody saw M. Night Shyamalan's excellent documentary, The Happening.

      Which is quite possible, considering the box office receipts.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Goldfingerism by Spazztastic · · Score: 2

      That's a really poor stereotype. The number of truckers who actually account for the drug using ones is a very small percentage, you just don't hear about your average Joe Sixpack driving his truck from point A to point B without incident because it doesn't make headlines.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    12. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are no lorries in Utah, ya silly Brit.

    13. Re:Goldfingerism by boethius78 · · Score: 1

      God-damned communist bees.

    14. Re:Goldfingerism by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Sure. If you count the bees as the enemy. I often wondered if any of these truck drivers got spooked by a bee sting (or several) enough to take their attention off the road.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    15. Re:Goldfingerism by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

      That's a really poor stereotype. The number of truckers who actually account for the drug using ones is a very small percentage, you just don't hear about your average Joe Sixpack driving his truck from point A to point B without incident because it doesn't make headlines.

      This. Truckers spend all their time driving, and people don't trust you with millions in cargo if you're regularly drunk or high.

      Actually, my favorite trucking+drugs story has nothing to do with the driver being high--it involves the guy who took a semi full of pot on the lower (cars only) level of the George Washington Bridge...

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    16. Re:Goldfingerism by Spazztastic · · Score: 2

      Not only that, they do get drug tested regularly. Aside from lots of caffeine, I don't know many who keep their jobs that are using. Sure, there's ways to fake those tests, but most of them are just good guys who work for a living. You get into one accident, even if it's not your fault, and you get blood tested. Some places even do hair sample testing depending on how major of an accident it is. I guarantee the guy who rolled the semi in the story is under a LOT of scrutiny right now.

      Hopefully he wasn't doing anything he shouldn't have been, but no matter what every aspect of his life is under a magnifying glass for the trucking company and insurance companies investigation.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    17. Re:Goldfingerism by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Occam's razor wouldn't tell us that the driver was being attacked by dozens of bees when he lost control of the truck. Some of them got into the cab before they left.

    18. Re:Goldfingerism by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe a supervillain is attempting to corner the world's honey supply.

      A feat made all the more difficult by it being stored hexagonally.

    19. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can we get some of these placebos?! Maybe there's some in this truck! I'm cured! I mean... OUCH!

    20. Re:Goldfingerism by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Overall food supply, you mean? Many agricultural crops worldwide are pollinated by bees.
      So, a supervillain is plausible.

    21. Re:Goldfingerism by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hopefully he wasn't doing anything he shouldn't have been

      His wife was with him and got stung too, so there's certainly one form of recreation they might have been indulging in...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:Goldfingerism by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The singular of lorries is lorry, Dan.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:Goldfingerism by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I had a friend in the neighborhood where I used to work that used to be a truck driver. From what he told me, the job pays well because it's hell. If you go one second above the 12 hour limit, if you make one mistake in your logbook, etc. you're looking at a huge potential shitstorm. There's very little room for error.

    24. Re:Goldfingerism by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Maybe a supervillain is attempting to corner the world's honey supply.

      Finally, someone dares to speak the truth.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:Goldfingerism by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is the point. Groups of creatures die, classes of vehicles crash, etc. pretty much all the time, whether or not they are reported in the media. Such events are not thereby linked in reality, nor should such events be of much scientific or practical interest unless they deviate from long-term expectations.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    26. Re:Goldfingerism by blueturffan · · Score: 1

      If I had points I'd mod this one up. That's very clever!

    27. Re:Goldfingerism by sconeu · · Score: 1

      The bees wanted out. After all, Utah is the Beehive State

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    28. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the honey, then you get the women.

    29. Re:Goldfingerism by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The singular of lorries is lorry, Dan.

      No, it's 'truck'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    30. Re:Goldfingerism by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      The enemy in question is probably the bees. All it takes is for ONE to squeeze out, and bother the driver enough that he steers off the road.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    31. Re:Goldfingerism by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      By requiring a ransom of 1 Beellion pollinating insects

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    32. Re:Goldfingerism by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Best line, ever.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Goldfingerism by swalve · · Score: 1

      You would think all the man love at the truck stops would encourage them to hit their stop time early.

    34. Re:Goldfingerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er .. not a Goldfingerism. The quote is from Marc-Ange Draco, a Mafia don, and the father of Contessa Teresa di Vicenzo, Bond's love interest (and, briefly, spouse) in the novel On Her Majesty's Secret Service.

      The "happenstance", "coincidence", "enemy action" phrases are sub-titles of three chapters in the "Goldfinger" book, and the phrase is used by Goldfinger in the movie of the same name. The phrase isn't used directly in the book (nor is "I expect you to die").

      Although Ian Fleming does like to re-use certain phrases (e.g., "red Indians"), I don't recall this one being used in any other of his books or short stories.

  3. What is amazing by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    is that bee keepers continue to transport them all over. It seems like the smart thing is to require that at the least they be in only one state. IOW, no transportation over state lines.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:What is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bee: I swear officer, I don't know how that pollen got there.....*licks his appendages*
      Officer: HEY!
      Bee: Sorry!

    2. Re:What is amazing by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Bees fly across state lines, so that probably wouldn't help.

      It's *still* not known *For sure* what *causes* colony collapse disorder, there's only the condition they always find when it happens. Is it really just one or two factors, or a combination of everything?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:What is amazing by pinfall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is persistent pesticides not directly transportation per se. Colony collapse was happening in other countries and populations recovered after Bayer's gaucho was pulled from pollinating farms.

    4. Re:What is amazing by AlecC · · Score: 1

      But the whole point of the transportation is to move bees to the different orchard areas at the times that they are in flower. The routine trading involved with fixed bee colonies would be tiny. What they are doing is moving bees from California's early flowering orchards to Oregon's later ones and then Washington's even later one, then perhaps over to Florida for a bit of subtropical winter pollination. Limiting to one state would remove the reason for moving them, and require major changes to farming practice (which, maybe, are needed).

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    5. Re:What is amazing by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      The problem is persistent pesticides not directly transportation per se. Colony collapse was happening in other countries and populations recovered after Bayer's gaucho was pulled from pollinating farms.

      I made a presentation to the Pesticide Advisory Committee of Prince Edward Island regarding the use of imidacloprid on potato fields here and it gathered a lot of media coverage. It was the first story on our local news on TV, and both radio stations mentioned it throughout the day in their newscasts. I had produced a graphStan.gif (7651 bytes) which showed use and accumulation on PEI and held it up under my head throughout the whole news interview after my presentation, but it was NOT shown on TV because the lawyers at CBC (our national public television station) head office did not stand up to the lawyers from the Bayer company. Our newspaper has said that it will publish the graph. I will ask Allen if he might put it on his wonderful imidacloprid website.

      Free trade probably prohibits any action that may harm Bayers profits in the US an the UK, even though it will decimate our food production.

      Canada sells Asbestos, even though it's illegal here. When companies complain, we invoke free trade laws. Damned if I know why it's still illegal here, other than the fact that it kills people.

      My theory on the truck crashes is that they all happened while trying to sneak past BP stations.

    6. Re:What is amazing by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the bees are needed in different states during the season as different plants need to be pollinated. When a certain crop or fruit tree blooms will will depend a lot on location.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    7. Re:What is amazing by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      There's at least one movie about it:

      http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/Vanishing-of-the-Bees/70166291?trkid=438403

      More bee transport is leading to more bee crashes, but the root cause of increased transport (including flying bees in from Australia to the USA) is colony collapse disorder. And, if the conclusions drawn in the movie are correct, CCD stems from the use of persistent pesticides in the growing of corn, soy, cotton, wheat, etc. They go on to describe bans on these pesticides in Europe and how the bees have bounced back there.

    8. Re:What is amazing by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      require major changes to farming practice (which, maybe, are needed).

      Just one change, end monocultures. I think the root cause of monoculture farming is actually in how farming is financed - everything is pushed to the limits of "efficiency" only planting proven maximally profitable crops in the proven maximally profitable methods because to do anything less is to take even more risk of losing the farm due to a less than optimal harvest. The risks of monocultures are well known, but the U.S. agriculture industry continues to take those risks farther and farther.

      If we, as a culture, were willing to pay 25 to 50% more for our basic food (grains, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy), there would be no reason to take the risks of persistent pesticides and the other "necessities" of monoculture farming. It sounds like a big increase, but food is cheap and spending a little more for a diverse food supply will reap bigger savings in areas like nutritional health, and less bees killed on the highway.

    9. Re:What is amazing by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem is that the food that is cheap is not generally the best food for people to be eating.

      When its possible to feed a family at McDonalds for LESS than it would cost to feed that same family making a proper meal from good raw ingredients, there must be SOMETHING totally screwed up.

      US agricultural policies are one of the major causes of obesity in the US.

    10. Re:What is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in 1980-81, I worked for CDC. At that time, I was just off the ground floor of a disease that was striking homosexuals. We went to president reagan and asked for money to track down homosexuals. He said no (the early parts of 'the band played on' is lacking). CDC and states finally shut down their bath houses since we did not have the money to track all of the individuals ( we knew that there were fewer than 1000 at that time; and it was later found to be somewhere around 150; could have stopped nearly all had reagan parted with 50 million ). We still were not certain where the contact was.

      The point is, when you have a disease that is spreading, you can not find the cause, and you do not have the money to check out everything, then your best bet is to stop the likely spots. The bees may travel across a border IFF they live next to the border. worker bees stay with the hives and queens do not travel more than a 1-20 miles in their lifetime.

    11. Re:What is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bees don't fly very far, genius.

    12. Re:What is amazing by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      It seems like the smart thing is to require that at the least they be in only one state.

      Huh? Seriously, I don't get it. Why would that be the smart?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    13. Re:What is amazing by mortonda · · Score: 1

      It seems like the smart thing is to require that at the least they be in only one state.

      Huh? Seriously, I don't get it. Why would that be the smart?

      It is a standard procedure to limit wildlife disease. Deer, fish...

    14. Re:What is amazing by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      When its possible to feed a family at McDonalds for LESS than it would cost to feed that same family making a proper meal from good raw ingredients, there must be SOMETHING totally screwed up.

      Family of four at McDonalds, two adult meals and two kids meals, probably costs about 4+4+3+3=14 pounds (UK prices, sorry). I can assure you that you can get a couple of good family meals for that price if you make them at home.

      It's more a question of time, i.e. people not wanting to spend any of it cooking.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:What is amazing by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      require major changes to farming practice (which, maybe, are needed).

      If we, as a culture, were willing to pay 25 to 50% more for our basic food (grains, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy), there would be no reason to take the risks of persistent pesticides and the other "necessities" of monoculture farming.

      But what would actually happen is the 25 to 50% would go into the pockets of corporations and they would continue shoveling crap to the public. What we really need to do is get the general public to give a crap about what they eat, and not just "healthier == $$".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    16. Re:What is amazing by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Same here. McDonalds is actually quite expensive. A "meal" off the board is $5-6 USD. And I feel like I'm going to die after I eat it.

    17. Re:What is amazing by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If you feel like you are going to die after eating a meal at McDonalds, you have a serious health problem, and should seek medical treatment immediately.

    18. Re:What is amazing by khallow · · Score: 1

      The problem is persistent pesticides not directly transportation per se. Colony collapse was happening in other countries and populations recovered after Bayer's gaucho was pulled from pollinating farms.

      We also have concrete evidence that there are various other causes for widespread colony collapse too. Talking about "the" problem ignores that there are probably multiple factors involved.

    19. Re:What is amazing by Shompol · · Score: 1

      It looks like all agriculture produce is pumped full of insecticides (an other poisons) at US:
      http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/30/opinion/oe-meyerhoff30

      Industrial poisons not regulated and frankly I am more scared about ourselves than bees.

    20. Re:What is amazing by bmajik · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that bees are more important for commercial pollination then they are as honey producers. Most commercial bee keepers make their best money by renting bees to farmers who need pollination. California almonds come to mind. THe bees are trucked to where the pollination is required. The farmers pay for this because it is essential.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    21. Re:What is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not amazing. bee keepers make money transporting their hives around. time to Occupy Bee-Hive to stop these greedy, fat-cat, bee-keepers! :P

    22. Re:What is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's *still* not known *For sure* what *causes* colony collapse disorder

      We may not know exactly what causes it, but we've pretty much determined that it is not one single cause and we've identified things that we know contribute to it. The most alarming was the pesticide that was approved by the EPA despite knowing at the time that it had an adverse effect on bees. Also alarming is the evidence of harm in feeding bees HFCS instead of the natural sources they're used to and the fact that we're still doing it.

      Whatever turns out to be the causes, we pretty much know what to do to avoid it. I have a parent who is an apiarist and is tapped into a community of many other amateur apiarists. It turns out that when you keep bees in a single place that's far away from large agricultural areas and give them easy sources of natural food within their range, they're almost entirely fine. It's when you move them around, get them close to large-scale farming and start messing with their food source that they don't cope well.

    23. Re:What is amazing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      What about places that use tit that don't have CCD? places that don't use it and still have CCD?

      Their is no scientific evidences that Imidacloprid causes CCD. IT's been looked at a lot,.
      I'm not letting it off the hook; I'm just saying it needs to be looked at scientifically, not emotionally. And emotional knee jerk reaction will help no one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:What is amazing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "only planting proven maximally profitable crops in the proven maximally profitable methods "

      Don't forget, that' all a long term view. Meaning they want to use that plot of land next year, and the year after, and so on. UNlike many other corporate industrie, cutting out the long term view for this seasons profits never ends well for the corporation.

      "If we, as a culture, were willing to pay 25 to 50% more for our basic food (grains, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy), there would be no reason to take the risks of persistent pesticides and the other "necessities" of monoculture farming."

      False.

      We would loose over 25% to 100% of our available food, depending on the specific item. That means 200+ percent increase.
      "will reap bigger savings in areas like nutritional health"
      also false.

      And food is cheap, DEPENDS on location. But hey, lets return to the bad ol' days of famine, disease, and food poisoning.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:What is amazing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "m good raw ingredients, ah, the raw food fallacy, coupled with the McDonald fallacy.

      Volume is why it's cheaper.

      If a family projected all it's food needs for a year, and paid up front for they food, they could get it cheaper, even if the food was delivered weekly.
      Not practical, but that's why there is a difference, not because of any evil food distribution plots.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    26. Re:What is amazing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I can get a soda, fries and a double cheese burger for 3 bucks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:What is amazing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      IT's not, and it's been debunked. HInt: All alarmist 'documentaries' are alarmist and as such shouldn't be trusted as a source.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:What is amazing by treeves · · Score: 1

      Only if you get the freakishly "small" fries, and why would you do that when the fries are the best thing about McDonald's???

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    29. Re:What is amazing by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      require major changes to farming practice (which, maybe, are needed).

      If we, as a culture, were willing to pay 25 to 50% more for our basic food (grains, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy), there would be no reason to take the risks of persistent pesticides and the other "necessities" of monoculture farming.

      But what would actually happen is the 25 to 50% would go into the pockets of corporations and they would continue shoveling crap to the public. What we really need to do is get the general public to give a crap about what they eat, and not just "healthier == $$".

      True, that is what is happening with Nestle's organic brands... the general public may actually give a crap what they eat, but it's damn difficult to do anything about it. We participate in a "farm share" - for vegetables and fruit, it's cute, it redirects maybe 20% of our grocery budget away from the supermarket, but I doubt they've even noticed or will do anything about it in real terms (like changing their product offerings).

    30. Re:What is amazing by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      "If we, as a culture, were willing to pay 25 to 50% more for our basic food (grains, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy), there would be no reason to take the risks of persistent pesticides and the other "necessities" of monoculture farming."

      False.

      We would loose over 25% to 100% of our available food, depending on the specific item. That means 200+ percent increase.
      "will reap bigger savings in areas like nutritional health"
      also false.

      And food is cheap, DEPENDS on location. But hey, lets return to the bad ol' days of famine, disease, and food poisoning.

      To listen to the "Vanishing Bees" editorial, back in the day of small farms with varied crops and NO pesticides whatsoever, crop loss ran about 33% on average (and, yes, there was more variation in yield from year to year, more bad years due to drought, etc.) Today, with Gaucho and other persistent pesticides - that are illegal in much of Europe due to their effects on bees - we still lose about 33% of our crop to pests, with the difference being, if we suddenly stop using the pesticides and still plant 100,000 contiguous acres of a single species of corn, we could well lose 100% of that plot to a single pest population explosion.

    31. Re:What is amazing by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      IT's not, and it's been debunked. HInt: All alarmist 'documentaries' are alarmist and as such shouldn't be trusted as a source.

      It has been banned, debunked is in the eye of the beholder:

      http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/11/26/millions_of_bees_dead_bayers_gaucho_blamed.htm

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imidacloprid_affects_on_bees

      Alarmist 'documentaries' tell another side of the story, not always further from the truth than Fox news.

    32. Re:What is amazing by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia, I am paying about 8 bucks for mince, 2 bucks for pasta sauce and about 2 bucks for pasta. That gives me 4 servings of Spaghetti Bolognese (or more likely 5 if you didnt have huge servings) So that's about $15 if you count the small amount of oil and other things used in it. Call it $3 per person (assuming you are drinking water). If I looked, I could find other meals that are just as good value.

      I dont go to McDonalds but I do go to Hungry Jacks (Aussie name for Burger King) and I would find it hard to get a hamburger (let alone a meal) for $3 (even buying the multi-person boxes would be more expensive than the $15 price for the food)

      Going to KFC and buying a "family meal", you would be lucky to get 4-5 people worth of KFC for less than $20

      And the spaghetti is much better for you than the fast food. (complex carbs in the pasta, iron in the meat and basically no sugar or other sweetener)

    33. Re:What is amazing by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I was exaggerating, but shitty food does make me feel gross. And I'm neither a health nut or in bad shape... so I have to imagine that's pretty common.

    34. Re:What is amazing by sjames · · Score: 1

      But it's unlikely that an individual bee flies across more than one state line.

    35. Re:What is amazing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter, because bees visit the same flowers. Remember, when you roll all around in a flower, you're rolling all around with every other bee that rolled around in that flower. :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:What is amazing by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's the difference between a slow transmission over a period of many years and an overnight transmission by truck.

    37. Re:What is amazing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is happening worldwide, so it's not the kind of thing that can be prevented just by avoiding shipping bees around in a single country.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Flight of the bumblebee by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's well known that when half the bees are flying, the truck weighs half as much. I think Mythbusters proved it.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:Flight of the bumblebee by hawkbat05 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Flight of the bumblebee by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      <Sigh> Joke, dude. Stupid Poe's law.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    3. Re:Flight of the bumblebee by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      You can also glue bees on a laptop and so make it fly.

    4. Re:Flight of the bumblebee by drawfour · · Score: 1

      Yep. I do this all the time. My 9-pound Alienware is as light as MacBook Air with the bees!

    5. Re:Flight of the bumblebee by swalve · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when my bird flies over my postage meter, it instantly registers the bird's weight.

  5. Someone had to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Bees you say?

    http://www.apathymachine.com/gallery/d/1973-1/oprah-bees.gif

  6. Fear of bees? by Coisiche · · Score: 1

    If trucks transporting bees are statistically more likely to crash than other trucks (although an example of two doesn't suggest so) then you'd have to consider what might cause that and maybe it's drivers being just a little bit nervous about there being a few million bees just a few feet away.

    1. Re:Fear of bees? by delinear · · Score: 2

      More likely there's only the perception that bee trucks are crashing more often because the media pick up on the slightly more interesting cargo. I'm sure trucks full of salt or beans or cushions crash all the time, they just don't stick in the mind or get the same media focus as "25 million bees loosed by crash!!". If anything, I'd say the crashes are suggestive that the drivers aren't nervous of their cargo - if they were they'd probably take more care (it's rare to hear of cargos of toxic chemicals or nuclear waste crashing, probably because the people driving them around are terrified and extra careful).

    2. Re:Fear of bees? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      To transport things like toxic chemicals, nuclear waste, or explosives you need to be an experienced drive with an immaculate record. Think of those drives as being the Seal Team 6 of the trucking world with their requirements and training. Also they usually drive specially designed trucks instead of the standard box or tanker truck. They also drive on routes that avoid traffic, populated areas, and other less than ideal conditions.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  7. Sounds like... by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

    the start of a Hitchcock movie.

    1. Re:Sounds like... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Or a X-Files episode.

    2. Re:Sounds like... by icebrain · · Score: 1
      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  8. Recount by JustOK · · Score: 2

    They accounted for ALL 25 000 000 bees? Were any hurt in the accident? Did any die?
    A suspiciously round number. too.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:Recount by Arlet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article mentions 25 million, not 25000000.

      You're adding 6 extra significant digits that weren't there, and then joke about it.

    2. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm... what?

    3. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except they didn't add six extra significant digits but I will. Beware the suspiciously round 2.5000000 * 10^7 bees!

    4. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its really not that hard,Its really quite simple, all you gotta do is find the queen and the rest will attack you, then you put yourself or some gullible participant inside a cage, then put the queen down, and then they leave you alone.

      Just like geeks and coffee beans, or boys and video games, or men and cars/women.

    5. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Half a bee is unaccounted for. Eric is said to be distraught.

    6. Re:Recount by captainpanic · · Score: 2
    7. Re:Recount by tgd · · Score: 0

      There are 10 types of bees in the world. Those that can be counted in binary, and those that can't.

    8. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article mentions 25 million, not 25000000.

      You're adding 6 extra significant digits that weren't there, and then joke about it.

      Actually, Arlet, 25 million is 25000000. Just saying.

    9. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand how significant digits work. just because there are zeros does not mean the digits are significant. That is only true after the decimal place. Now if they said 25,000,001...that would be a different story.

    10. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I missing something here? A 25 followed by six zeroes is 25 million.

    11. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... 25 million == 25000000. One's just typed out in words, the other in numbers.

      Now if they said ABOUT 25 million or AROUND 25 million, then you'd have something to work with.

      Until such time, the summary makes it sound like an exact number.

    12. Re:Recount by Arlet · · Score: 2

      Well, the article said neither. It says "25 million", which implies 2 significant digits.

      If somebody then makes a big deal out of this precision, and rewrites this as 25000000, we can reasonably assume they mean 8 significant digits, otherwise there would be no reason to make that comment using that notation in the first place.

    13. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, was that a joke? Am I missing something?

      In my world, 25 million == 25,000,000 (==25 000 000 == 25000000).

    14. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right...so what your saying is that writing "25 million" implies 2 significant digits? I was not aware of that. That truly is "Insightful".
      The parent wrote "ALL" in uppercase for a reason.
      If someone says "all 25 million bees" then that implies ALL bees where accounted for which implies someone counted them ALL.
      "All one thousand people on board drowned....well it was actually one thousand, two hundred and thirty but since I only specified one significant digit I'm still right."

    15. Re:Recount by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      We suspect one of the missing bees was eaten by an escaped tiger that was later shot.

    16. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the figure in TFA is just an estimate.

    17. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He writes 25000000 which is 25 million.

      You write 25000000 saying it's not 25 million.

      What part am i not getting here?

    18. Re:Recount by swalve · · Score: 1

      It is a significant digit joke. And a terrible one at that, since it isn't like they are measuring the bees by the million.

    19. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25 million is 25 million weather you write it with letters or zeros. They are not extra digits that is how it is written numerically. So I don't see the problem, or your point.
       

    20. Re:Recount by JustOK · · Score: 1

      'course, saying "around" or "about" etc 25 would have worked. With that number of bees, I'm thinking only the 2 is significant.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    21. Re:Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25 million = 25,000,000

    22. Re:Recount by mcswell · · Score: 1

      No, we cannot reasonably assume that. Where did you go to school?

    23. Re:Recount by Arlet · · Score: 1

      We can reasonably assume it was a better one than yours.

  9. Lost moon of Posh? Spice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone! The Doctor wont listen to me. The bees are disappearing!

    1. Re:Lost moon of Posh? Spice? by wed128 · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what i thought of...I'm surprised this comment is so far down!

  10. IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Clearly an EVIL conspiracy of some sort - we just have to figure out what and who?

    AREA 51 is not far from there, could this be related to the UFO they have hidden???

    1. Re:IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!! by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      The magnetic field of the UFO disturbes the sense of direction of the bees and thus they collectively bash their heads in against the board separating them from the driver. As the driver is stung by the surviving bees it fails to controll the truck and thus the truck crashes.

      The conspiracy is that they claim they have found all the bees (who counted them? It must be a lie!) in order to be able to "disprove" the truth, since the thruth could not have happend if the bees survived.
      Thus the existence of the UFO's has been covered up.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    2. Re:IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!! by Cwix · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the bees from the x-files movie.

      I for one think that they easily found all of the bees. I mean when you have ufos it is easy to track down and beam all of the bees back into a hive.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  11. IT REALLY MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!!!! by pearl298 · · Score: 0

    Clearly an EVIL conspiracy of some sort - we just have to figure out what and who? AREA 51 is not far from there, could this be related to the UFO they have hidden???

  12. I've heard of bean counters, but ... by narcc · · Score: 1

    25 million bees that closed the road have been accounted for

    So ... who counted them all?

    1. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important question is not who counted them, but how did they get the bees to stay still and not get out of order while they were being counted. This question is far more interesting than why so many bee trucks overturn.

    2. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by delinear · · Score: 1

      That's simple, you just paint a number on the back of each one with a tiny little paintbrush to make sure you don't count any twice.

    3. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or attach an RFID tag to each one. That's the solution to everything these days, isn't it?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Rainman.

      Definently 25,000,000 bees, Definently... time for Wapner.

    5. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite easy when you have the knack of it. You just count all the legs and then divide by six.

    6. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      25 million bees that closed the road have been accounted for

      So ... who counted them all?

      You don't need to, they're all given little ear tags at birth which can be scanned by a barcode reader.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:I've heard of bean counters, but ... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Even easier, count the antennae and shift right 1 bit

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  13. Vanishing of the Bees by BlahSnarto · · Score: 1

    There is a really good documentary about why this is happening. It has a lot to do with the pesticides we use and the monoculture we are moving to in planting crops.

    If you are truly interested please check out the website (http://www.vanishingbees.com/). I think netflix also has this as a streaming feature also, not sure now since i canceled my netflix :P

    1. Re:Vanishing of the Bees by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, CCD was linked pretty strongly to a combination of a fungus and a virus, occurring in every colony affected in the study (but individually not accounting for the effect).

    2. Re:Vanishing of the Bees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard, CCD was linked pretty strongly to a combination of a fungus and a virus, occurring in every colony affected in the study (but individually not accounting for the effect).

      Oh, damn, now you did it.

      You crushed a "Humanity is teh EVIL!!!!" fantasy with actual facts.

      How dare you.

    3. Re:Vanishing of the Bees by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

      I think netflix also has this as a streaming feature also, not sure now since i canceled my netflix :P

      Yup, it's on there. We watched it last week. Surprisingly, it was fairly interesting.

      --
      The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
    4. Re:Vanishing of the Bees by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Last I heard, CCD was linked pretty strongly to a combination of a fungus and a virus, occurring in every colony affected in the study (but individually not accounting for the effect).

      With the rise of migratory bee-keeping (as mentioned in the summary) suspected of being the factor that has lead to the increased spread of these issues in bee colonies. My understanding was the key insight that led them to do this study was that someone correlated the increased incidence of bee colony die off with the increase in migratory bee-keeping. Migratory bee-keeping allowed for an explanation of the, relatively, recent increase in the incidence of bee colonies being infected with both the virus and the fungus.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:Vanishing of the Bees by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Lol an unsubstantiated claim crushes all opposition?

      Fungus/virus may very well be the problem, but you cant claim that the other viewpoints are wrong based upon something someone heard once.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    6. Re:Vanishing of the Bees by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he heard it ON THE INTERNET!

      --
      +1 Disagree
  14. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    When the majority of the population will realize just how truely FUCKED the world would be without bees...

    never?

  15. Best DUI excuse ever. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    With something like that in your pocket, you just pound the brewskies going down the road without a care in the world.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  16. Why so many wrecks. by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    Obviously the killer bees are lying in wait, to ambush the semis as they come around the corner on the highway in an effort to free their cousins.

  17. Oh come on by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    You don't think the media can make something out a truck full of CUSHION's crashing?

    As for beans... those jokes just write themselves.

    This is the media, low standards are to them a challenge.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Oh come on by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Oh absolutely, it will make the local headlines every time, and if worded right someone might send it in to Leno to get some attention there. However the bean jokes won't really make it past the local news.

  18. Obligatory by antifoidulus · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new truck-crashing bee overlords.

  19. Evolution in action, or the bees' revenge... by Mathinker · · Score: 3, Funny

    We all know that this Colony Collapse Syndrome is caused by evil cell-phone radiation. Well, the bees have evolved a defense mechanism which can sabotage electronics in their vicinity, thereby giving the truck drivers' GPS devices "Bee Jamming Syndrome" and causing a sharp rise in these kinds of accidents...

    1. Re:Evolution in action, or the bees' revenge... by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      No, we all know it's from systemic pesticides in the plants that they're pollinating. Otherwise they'd have just equipped the bees with tinfoil hats and solved this a long time ago.

    2. Re:Evolution in action, or the bees' revenge... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      So when you expose bees to cell phone radiation near a GPS, you get BJS? Sweet!

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:Evolution in action, or the bees' revenge... by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      no - it is Bee P syndrome - it fuels the problem

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    4. Re:Evolution in action, or the bees' revenge... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      We all know that this Colony Collapse Syndrome is caused by evil cell-phone radiation.

      Well my phone isn't evil, it runs Android. It only puts out healthy radiation.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    5. Re:Evolution in action, or the bees' revenge... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, we don't know. In fact, there isn't even a strong correlation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. It should be obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why So Many Crashes of Bee-Carrying Trucks?"

    Because bees are crappy drivers?

  21. They could not reach the pedals... by fotoguzzi · · Score: 0

    ...with their tiny little legs.

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  22. France knows about colony collapse disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Colony collapse disorder is caused by the pesticides we put on our grain seed. Scientists figured out how to make the whole plant resistant to pests. Our EPA / FDA tested the stuff with adult bees and approved it. They didn't check to see what happens to the bee larvae - the new bees (as opposed to nubies) have no sense of direction and can't survive outside the colony for more than 24 hours.

    France knows this. France has banned the pesticides. The USA needs more proof.

    1. Re:France knows about colony collapse disorder by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Colony collapse disorder

      Morroco, Libya, Lebanon, Cambodia, Vietnam, Canada. France knows a lot about colony collapse.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  23. Why so many? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    It seems that the skill of Semi truck drivers have went from skilled professionals to "i can drive a truck" idiots. you used to feel somewhat safe around semi trucks, now mostly idiots drive them that in order to drive 0.5mph faster than the one in front of them they cut hard into passing traffic, many times causing accidents so they can drive 0.5mph faster than the other truck that they were getting a drafting effect from and saving fuel.

    in the past 4 years we have had 5 semis drop off of an overpass because it seems they cant read the big yellow sign that says, "25mph ramp speed"

    it's just idiots driving big rigs.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Why so many? by HBI · · Score: 2

      With self-insured big trucking outfits having a one strike rule for their drivers, does this surprise you? A single ticket or accident ends your career with any big outfit. At that point, you can't get hired in the industry unless you can pony up the cash for your own private tractor. Anecdotal story: I once saved a driver's job by getting a ticket issued for backing up into a telephone pole overturned in NYC traffic court. If the ticket had stood, he'd have been unemployed the next day.

      Never mind the GPS tracking of their rigs...true story, I got a call in 1992 or 3 to drive to a shopping mall in Brielle, NJ. There was a JB Hunt rig sitting there parked. I was told to take pictures of it, leave, then send them to the safety department. It seems the driver had gone to visit his girlfriend there with his rig. They saw the transponder there and wanted documentation so that he could be fired when he showed up at his terminal in Ohio or somewhere. Mind you, he was going to show up on time at the terminal, but that didn't matter, he'd diverted from their mandated route.

      Policies like this create a lot of churn in the industry. Who would want to work for these people long term?

      The end result is that the quality of long haul drivers declines over time. It also means they pay less to drivers over time. I think that's the objective.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:Why so many? by wwbbs · · Score: 1

      Well often that truck driver is diverting loads (a not a load of sperm either) or he is transporting drugs/contraband from point a-b. So I can see why the management of these companies are so anal about tracking their equipment and there staff. Just think for a moment about how much profit a company stands to loose if they loose one major bonded delivery run because an employee decided that he would do what he pleased on the companies dime. Park the dam truck at a card lock and take a taxi. It's not like an 18 wheeler is easy to hide, or find a nice big metal dry shed / rock cavern / bridge to drive the truck under and make damn sure the transponder isn't able to reach a satellite or cell tower.

    3. Re:Why so many? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      self-insured

      Does anyone else here find that term oxymoronic?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Why so many? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I think if you're driving a lorry with a semi, you're not really concentrating on the road.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Why so many? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Do you work in the trucking business or are you just an amateur seduced by its glamour?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Why so many? by HBI · · Score: 1

      I was an independent adjuster at the time. I did mostly BI claims but I did a bit of PD also - the trucking stuff covered both. Most of the calls I got were "we just had an accident on Metropolitan Ave in Brooklyn, go out and investigate. I'd take signed and recorded statements, pictures, get police reports, draw diagrams and then handle the claim until settlement -ie, negotiating with lawyers - in the case of the trucking companies. Did some auto stuff for smaller ins companies that didn't have local adjusters of their own, and bus companies which self-insure often, similar to the trucking companies.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    7. Re:Why so many? by HBI · · Score: 1

      It is kind of oxymoronic but the statement has meaning. It means that claims handling is by the company itself. They usually are underwritten with a balloon liability policy once the claim amount gets outrageous - at the time (early-mid 90s) $1mil.

      The way the companies handle claims is by hiring an independent adjuster and/or a lawyer in the local area, depending on the situation. The adjuster handles it prior to litigation. When the litigation is imminent, the claim transfers to a lawyer for that bit. Most (90%+) claims get settled before actual lit, even if you have a lawyer.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    8. Re:Why so many? by HBI · · Score: 1

      In the case of most of the large outfits, load diversion just requires too many people involved to not talk/benefit. It doesn't happen all that much, considering the value and quantities carried.

      In small outfits it is more common. The seals they use for trucks are just plastic or lead bullshit and no one really checks. The worst ones are short-haul trucks with multiple stops. In that case, the sealing mechanisms are near-worthless and stuff 'falls off the truck' constantly.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    9. Re:Why so many? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      climb up on the rig at your fuel up and wrap tinfoil over the dome, remove it when you are back on the "route" and play stupid when asked.

      But this would require a smart truck driver to figure out.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Why so many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZOMG! A Slashdotter has come up with a glib, simplistic "workaround" and has outsmarted the engineers paid to design the system!

      ...or maybe they tie the system into the ECU-based "hours of engine operation" and odometer, dumbass.

      But realizing that the design engineers weren't completely retarded would require a smart Slashdotter to figure out.

    11. Re:Why so many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Design engineers ARE completely retarded. I've met many of them. Drooling retards is what most people call them. It's the special ed wing of the company.

      The only thing more retarded than the Design engineers is the Marketing people and HR people.

      That reminds me, I need to go make fun of the retards in Engineering, Our last bluetooth product was built without compatibility with the most popular cellphone on the market. Fucking retards.

  24. How many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    25 million bees that closed the road have been accounted for? How did they do that? One at a time?

  25. Not goldfingerism, it's because I have a BIG KOQUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to smell any of my fingers? Including the big one?

  26. Are there 'so many'? by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many bee transport journeys were made? What percentage of those journeys resulted in accidents? How does that compare as a percentage to the transportation of other goods?

    It's not a possible question to answer without a lot more data. It's not even possible to determine the question has a valid premise as yet.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Are there 'so many'? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But there have been at least 3 accidents in two years!

      Oh, wait, that doesn't prove anything. Maybe it's just that news reporters find bee spills more interesting than a load of lumber spilled?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Are there 'so many'? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The answer is simple if you've ever tried to drive a truck full of bees without crashing. Two million bees all shout "shotgun!" at once and you got to sit there with them buzzing at you to switch the radio to a country station.

    3. Re:Are there 'so many'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even those questions aren't particularly significant, with such a small sample size. Assuming there are more than three such journeys made per year, three accidents is a statistical blip.

      Oblig XKCD,

  27. I thought Occam's razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is what truck drivers use to make their lines of coke on a mirror

  28. Had to read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to see what all the buzz was about.

  29. Terrorist using Bees? by Danathar · · Score: 1

    What a nightmare....a bunch of Terrorists hijack 4 or 5 mega trucks full of bees into Times square and then crash the trucks into the median releasing them. Now THAT would be horrific.

    1. Re:Terrorist using Bees? by wwbbs · · Score: 1

      Yes it would be quite a seen wouldn't it. A local gas station lost close to a weeks sales last year due to a few hives falling off just a pick up truck. No one could get near the gas pumps for some time. Management solution call the fire department (duh!) Try explaining that one to the insurance adjusters.

  30. Covered in BEES... by EnsignCrusher · · Score: 0

    Surely there's an Eddie Izzard joke in here somewhere.

  31. Really? They are *all* accounted for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...and officials say 25 million bees that closed the road have been accounted for..."

    "1,234,112, 1,234,113, 1,234,114, 1,234,115... damnit, will you all stop flying around, I have to account for you all!"
     

    1. Re:Really? They are *all* accounted for? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but do they have little brands so you don't get them mixed up with someone else's bees?

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  32. Honey Has Become Very Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least here in Germany, a glass of pure (unblended) honey costs about €10, that's about US$15. Bee populations have been dying off over here as well.

  33. Re:I can't believe by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I can't bee-lieve....

    there, fixed that for ya, but you are still offtopic

  34. Just BEE more careful when driving by TheFakeMcCoy · · Score: 0

    Really all there is too it

    1. Re:Just BEE more careful when driving by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose they could choo-choo-choose to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. Keep the bees at home by GordoTheGeek · · Score: 1

    Not to lend credence to anything that one might read on about.com, but it's not just "bee researchers" that are starting to look at migratory beekeeping with a jaundiced eye. Inspectors are looking more carefully at the truckloads as they cross state lines as well. Trucking them all over the country not only spreads pathogens, but exposes the colony to a witches brew of agricultural chemicals and pesticides. CCD-affected hives tend to exhibit symptoms of any number of bee diseases and parasites, but also residue of dozens of pesticides.

  36. Pesticide Pollen by randomErr · · Score: 1
    One of the more interesting theories is that many GMO crops now produce a pesticide to kill off the wrong bugs. The idea is two fold:
    • - The pesticide builds up in adults and the hive and cause infertility
    • - The honey becomes unappetizing and the bees stave
    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Pesticide Pollen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's probably the same people claiming that GE crops are producing a vague, unspecified toxin that hurts people. The cry proteins, the group of insecticidal proteins that GE crops produce (well, some of them anyway, not all GE crops are the same) are very specific, and does not affect bees. They simply don't have the gut receptor that the cry proteins bind to. In fact, in places where they've relied on the GE crops instead of using pesticides, they've found an increase in insect biodiversity (which has brought its own challenges, namely mirid bugs and other insects that are unaffected by the cry protein and were previously killed by the pesticide sprays are now able to become pests). It's just par for the course from the anti-GE folks. They'll say just about anything as long as GMOs are the bad guy, like accusations that they, somehow, cause autism, sterility, sudden death of anything that eats them, spontaneous generation of virus sized fungal pathogens that infect both plants and animals, (I wish I could say I was joking, but that is one is pretty mainstream in the anti-GMO community), and other things that they conveniently won't back with evidence or even a plausible mechanism for how it could happen. If there's a problem with GE crops, it will be investigated, confirmed, and published scientifically (like the mirid problem). No offense, but this isn't exactly an interesting theory, more like yet another stupid urban legend from the the anti-vaxxers of agriculture

  37. Why Migratory Beekeeping? by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    AFAICT migratory beekeeping is unheard of in other parts of the world. Why does the US do it? Does it have any benefit over stationary bees?

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
    1. Re:Why Migratory Beekeeping? by GordoTheGeek · · Score: 1

      It's of no benefit to the bees, but the $100/hive that the beekeepers get to truck the hives around the country often forms a large portion of their income. The California almond industry is the biggest user if migratory hives and that won't change any time soon. The San Joaquin valley is is heavily loaded with almond trees that any resident bees would starve after the blooms drop. There's nothing else for miles around.

    2. Re:Why Migratory Beekeeping? by Skinkie · · Score: 1

      It is not unheard. It is even very common in China. The benefit for bee's: there is none. The benefit for the farmer: he gets his fruit, or more general in the USA: almond tree's pollinated. The benefit for the commercial beekeeper: more money with fewer bee's. The benefit for the bees? None, they even feed bee's antibiotics. And bee's like any animal needs a diversity of pollen, not only pollen from the same flowers. Because proteins are different in different flowers. (Don't fall in the trap that bee's only need nectar, nectar is energy, pollen is nutrition.)

      --
      Support Eachother, Copy Dutch Property!
    3. Re:Why Migratory Beekeeping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please for the love of all that is good in this world, stop it with the fucking apostrophes on plurals.

    4. Re:Why Migratory Beekeeping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apostrophe's on plural's ?

    5. Re:Why Migratory Beekeeping? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Not starving seems like a benefit to the bees.

    6. Re:Why Migratory Beekeeping? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      And bee's like any animal needs a diversity of pollen, not only pollen from the same flowers. Because proteins are different in different flowers.

      Also because any particular species of flower doesn't bloom year-round, so if the bees had only one kind of flower around they'd starve.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  38. Another unsustainable farming practice by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying it's the cause of CCD, but trucking bees across the continent and working them year round doesn't mimic their natural cycles, not to mention the heavy dependence on fossil fuels for all the transportation. Just my gut feeling, but I get the sense we're pushing things a bit too far here.

  39. Hauling bees by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My family farms cranberries, so I get to haul bees all the time. This doesn't have anything to do with missing honey bees. There are plenty of them where we're at. This is more like "Fertilizing" the bees. Farmers want more than natural usually provides. If they miss a season, it's no big deal. This is just the latest fad in "How to get more yield" In fact, most people near me are using bumble bees, which to my knowledge aren't having the problems honey bees are. Farmers share them around here. One sends his bees over, while you let him borrow a tractor, etc...

    also, more accidents hauling bees? Yea... try hauling a couple hundred hives on a flatbed and it becomes obvious why there are so many crashes. They get into the cab... no mater how tight you've got the windows shut. We've taken to wearing bee suits while we drive. Then you have all the other people on the road that seem to drive differently, especially when they are on motorcycles or convertibles, when you pull up next to them with a couple million bees in tow.

    1. Re:Hauling bees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hives should be sealed shut during transport, using screen mesh that is just adequate enough for the hives to get air while locking in all the bees in the hives.

    2. Re:Hauling bees by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      And you get all the bees into the hive before you put your fancy mesh on it how? You don't. And the ones that didn't get in follow you all the way to where-ever you're taking them. You think bees can't hit 60mph? You're right... they can't, but my estimate is they can hit about 40... you get to a stop light and before it turns green again they catch up and are REALLY pissed.

      We do seal the hives before we load them on the truck, the hives are built in such a way that they close completely. Hives aren't the old wooden ones you see in movies anymore, they're made out of a cardboard looking plastic stuff. They've got a flap that closes over and keeps them in.

  40. You're asking us?! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    There's no plausible hypotheses let alone an answer in the summary. So we're asked to provide them?! A bunch of unwashed geeks that avoid fresh air like the plague? Gimme a break.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  41. simple explanation by burris · · Score: 1

    The mysterious force that causes truckloads of bees to overturn also causes wild car chases to overturn a fruit vendors stall or strike an old flatbed truck carrying four dozen chicken coops.

    1. Re:simple explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the reason for these events is so boring, this being anathema to /., I have added unnecessary humor.

      ACTUALLY, your joke is somewhat correct. At least the chicken coop one. (but you completely forgot the ramp-made-of-innocent-looking-stuff)

      Having driven a truck or two (hay trucks, mostly*), I can tell you what likely caused the crash: Improperly secured hive boxes.

      these boxes flex. stack a bunch of them together in a non-interlocking pattern will invariably lead to sway. I've seen it on apple, hay, and all kinds of other flatbeds. Ask any real trucker what their nightmare situation entails. I'll bet a dollar that they mention sway. (Or a lot lizard with syphilis and a can-do attitude) .

      * insert hick joke here.Because the reason for these events is so boring, this being anathema to /., I have added unnecessary humor.

      ACTUALLY, your joke is somewhat correct. At least the chicken coop one. (but you completely forgot the ramp-made-of-innocent-looking-stuff)

      Having driven a truck or two (hay trucks, mostly*), I can tell you what likely caused the crash: Improperly secured hive boxes.

      these boxes flex. stack a bunch of them together in a non-interlocking pattern will invariably lead to sway. I've seen it on apple, hay, and all kinds of other flatbeds. Ask any real trucker what their nightmare situation entails. I'll bet a dollar that they mention sway. (Or a lot lizard with syphilis and a can-do attitude) .

      * insert hick joke here.

  42. BEEEES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like my women like I like my coffee.

    COVERED IN BEES.

  43. so.. 3 examples from two different years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is junk. Well, no, the fact of needing to transport and all that is fine.. so maybe more so of the summary.

    First, that's not a huge figure. And being shocked about it is crazy.. that's like saying "well there was one wreck of a Honda cr-z last year, and two this year... why the huge increase?!?! What's going on???" Even though there are many, many more AC indents involving other makes/models, or even just models of Honda's, you're making a big deal over 3 cr-z crashes... and the fact is there wasn't many on the road before because its a new model, and there's now more on the road than before. And if you'd look, most likely you'd find there's the same number of average crashes for the cr-z based on the # made and on the road vs other models.
    Same would apply to this summary.

  44. It's hard to drive when there are stinging BEES!!! by bareman · · Score: 1

    It's no wonder there are crashes...

    Q.E.D: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quBYjBH_1-Y

    The transport of bees however is completely understandable. It's the only way to keep churning out more copies of "Sock Full of Bees".

    (Audio NSFW, Audio/Video NSFE [not safe for empathy])
    http://www.myspace.com/video/sarah-leigh/sock-full-of-bees/2773468

  45. Who got that job... by bob3940 · · Score: 1

    Quoting from the article "officials say 25 million bees that closed the road have been accounted for", I wonder how many people it took to count all 25 million of them to makes sure they were all there. Also was the roadway covered with tiny little white sheets covering the bodies of those less fortunate bees that lost their lives?

  46. Tommy Callahan by andywebs · · Score: 2

    "Beeeeees! Bees in the car! Bees everywhere! God, they're huge and stinging like crazy! They're ripping my flesh off! Run away, your firearms are useless against them!"

    1. Re:Tommy Callahan by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      This seems like a good spot to put this:
      Bees (Lots of Bees)
      (Look behind you!)

  47. Or not many? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Two a year is a lot? Too small a sample to show a pattern.

  48. No coincidence by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    The bees are acting as a hive mind.

  49. ...So Long, and Thanks for All the "Pollen" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...So Long, and Thanks for All the "Pollen" (?)

  50. ...2 is "many"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gimme a break...

  51. I've never had a better reason to use this image. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1
    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  52. Africanized bees. by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    They're the problem and we all know it. They just drive around listening to raps and shooting all the jobs.

  53. All farmers need is the Insect Swarm tonic by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    What are they plasmid-phobes or something?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  54. Good argument against driving under the influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There would be a lot fewer crashes if the drivers didn't have a buzz on.

  55. Oh Eddie Izzard by Xphile101361 · · Score: 1

    Because I'm covered in bees!

  56. Too much misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having married into a beekeeping family, I couldn't help but notice that the writer of this article seems fairly uninformed.

    For one thing, TFA mentions the rise in the trucking of bees and attributes it without explanation to CCD. Bees are subject to a number of well understood diseases and parasites that beekeepers spend lots of time and money to protect their bees from. CCD is the blanket term for all the less well-understood diseases, parasites and harmful environmental factors. It strikes me as odd to assert that beekeepers would move their businesses around the country in an effort to combat an unknown threat, especially since for all they know, the new location (or the act of moving itself) could contribute to CCD.

    AFAIK, there are two primary reasons for migratory beekeeping:
    1) To protect bees from *known* diseases and parasites. Wintering bees involves letting the hives power down for a few months. Unfortunately, during this time of lowered activity, they have an increased susceptibility to problems like wax moths and other parasites. Moving the bees in the winter to places where pollination needs to occur means getting the bees to a warmer and healthier environment and let's them end the winter stronger.
    2) Financial incentive. Trucking your bees across the country means moving your entire business at least twice a year and is a large personal and financial burden. However, because demand for pollination services is so high, doing so actually ends up being profitable, and businesses that do not engage in this practice end up being less viable and more vulnerable to the random setbacks that plague any agricultural endeavor.

    In other words, migratory beekeeping is a matter of survival rather than preference. Moving your bees is a pain in the butt and often involves being away from your family for months at a time, but it is deemed necessary to stay competitive with both domestic and international (e.g. Argentina & China) producers.

    Another troubling phrase in the article is "industrialized hives." I'm not really sure what this might refer to, since economies of scale don't apply as much to beekeeping as they do pig farming or corn growing. You can't just create a mega-honey factory with millions of hives. The bees have to be distributed across a large area. Bees live as hives of a size governed by biology, and because bees have a well-understood range, only so many hives can be put in any one place. I am sure that very large honey outfits do exist, but in my experience, very small businesses (less than 10 people) is actually the norm, and these small businesses are as affected by the various diseases and parasites as anybody else.

    Any finally, I just have to say something about this assertion, "Transporting the hives from farm to farm then spreads the pathogens to local bee populations." This may be true, but these pathogens spread even before migratory beekeeping became common. In fact, they spread in spite of a universal desire to keep them from spreading and international and interstate restrictions on moving bees. The irony is that the spread of these pathogens was one of the factors that made migratory beekeeping necessary. On the other hand, maybe keeping all hives local would slow the spread of new diseases and disease variants. That would be a good thing, I suppose.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diseases_of_the_honey_bee

  57. Escape! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously the bees are mind-controlling the drivers so they'll crash and the bees will be able to spread themselves over a wider area.

  58. It's because of the bees by Chysn · · Score: 1

    If accident rates for bee trucks are higher than rates in the general trucking industry (which I don't think is established in TFA), it could be because a small number of bees get into the cab during loading, and then emerge to startle the driver en route. Insect distractions are a significant cause of non-commercial auto accidents.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
    1. Re:It's because of the bees by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I picture some cheese 70's TV show where a bees startles a truck driver so badly, he takes hiow hands of the wheel to swat at a bee, causing the truck to veer into oncoming traffic,and then...

      If TV Drama, Truck hist a family station wagon, paralyzes child who will learn to be accepteds in about 100 minutes from now.

      If this is A Six million Dollar man episode - Cause a truck carrying a nuclear war head to crash. Local fembots take it. Possible Bigfoot sighting.

      If this is a Simon and Simon episode - Crashes into a tree releasing new mutant bees craft s by some evil corporation for no logical reason.

      If this is a family guy episode - Peter and a chicken fight and quagmire says Giggity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Worker bees... by odirex · · Score: 2

    "Colony collapse disorder (CCD) is a phenomenon in which worker bees from a beehive or European honey bee colony abruptly disappear." They went off to occupy wall street.

  60. Are you going to compensate the beekeepers? by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    Keeping migratory hives from, well, migrating, would incur a huge financial hit on beekeepers. Additionally, if they aren't migrating, they aren't polinating. Given the current batch of CCD, it's not like in-state hives (natural or man-owned) could compensate, so you'd also see a significant impact on cash crops.

    What's your suggestion for them?

    (And, yes, I've kept bees.)

    1. Re:Are you going to compensate the beekeepers? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      The solution is for the farmers to keep their own bees, along with enough plant diversity to keep them happy year-round.

      Trucking bees cross-country from monoculture to monoculture is a fundamentally stupid idea.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Are you going to compensate the beekeepers? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Farmers could keep bees if they wanted, but they don't. I suspect it's a time and cost issue.

      Trucking bees cross-country from monoculture to monoculture is a fundamentally good idea.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Are you going to compensate the beekeepers? by bjwest · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's right, there's money involved. We need to keep the flow of money going before we worry about the impact on the environment.

      That mode of thinking will mean (is meaning?) the destruction of our ability to survive on this planet. It's all good though - people are making money. And those with the money are the ones that will be able to live in the domed cities.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    4. Re:Are you going to compensate the beekeepers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a right to spread bubanic plague all over? Do you have a right to spread HIV if you have it? Is that what you are saying? Your rights stop at the tip of my nose. When your bees come and create a mess in other state's bees, then there is a problem.

  61. It was no accident by dayton967 · · Score: 1

    Those darn Africanized Honey Bees are doing it, they are banding together and causing the trucks to flip. What better way to get rid of your enemy then attacking when they are in the middle of being transported.

  62. Drivers fall asleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that buzz just has to lull them.

  63. Tommy Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be fooled there are no bees just drunk drivers usig the bee excuse..."your weapons are useless against them"...

  64. The plural of "anecdote" is not⦠by J'raxis · · Score: 1

    500,000 trucking accidents occur each year. Two crashes involving bee trucks, and this "Live science" rag tries to claim there's some sort of pattern here?

    1. Re:The plural of "anecdote" is not⦠by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It was just an alarmist excuse to do another article on CCD.
      While the general public should be reminded of CCD from time to time, that was an amateurish excuse of an article to do so.

      Quite frankly, just putting out a 'current information' article would of been fine,.

      I mean, I for one, welcome are new truck crashing Apis mellifera overlords.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  65. Bees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever tried to drive a rig while being jacked by bees?

  66. sounds like a MythBusters test can bees in a truck by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    sounds like a MythBusters test can bees in a truck make it flip over?

  67. I Want To Believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Truth is Out There!!!!

  68. x farmer by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I live next to a retired farmer. he still keeps bees. he was old fashioned in that his farm had its own bee hive. He said this bee problem never touched him and doesn't today. The people he knows don't think there is a bee problem; but they are non industrial bee keepers and are more natural about it. He thinks organic farming also helps with these GM crops and chemicals just adding to the list of things attacking the bees. Bees are tough and self managed better than anything except ants; if they have problems its most likely something we are doing.

    Speaking of which, I grew up with finches all over; gradually they went away and I didn't notice-- but I remember lots of them and the noise they made come spring-- now its not even comparable. I wonder what we've done to lower that population as well... Plus the butterflies are lower too... Climate change is still minor over here (but the extremes are getting so common, it doesn't mean anything when we break a record) so it hard to believe a few decades of those changes would be the cause...

    1. Re:x farmer by bmajik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My wife is a backyard beekeeper. CCD is a big deal and nobody is sure what's causing it. And it does not affect just large honey operations.

      You are waxing a bit too poetic about bees. There are all kinds of pathogens that bees don't "self manage" away: Varroa, tracheal mites, wax moths, not to mention mice, etc.

      The interesting thing about hives that have had CCD strike is that _nothing_ wnats anything to do with the hives. We've had a colony get weak before and nearly immediatley , wasps and other bees were robbing the hives while the remaining bees tried in vain to defend it. The yellowjackets can smell the larvae and wreack havoc all over the hive.

      Normally if a colony gets weak or otherwise leaves a hive, all kinds of critters move in and take the various parts that are interesting to them.

      But apparently in CCD hives, that doesn't happen. It's like all of the normal pests/predators can tell something is wrong. It's a literal overnight ghost town. There will be hundreds of pounds of honey sitting in there and nobody wants it.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    2. Re:x farmer by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      There will be hundreds of pounds of honey sitting in there and nobody wants it.

      Honey badger wants it. He don't give a shit.

  69. Re:sounds like a MythBusters test can bees in a tr by dayton967 · · Score: 1

    Umm get a large number of them to push a large rock into the middle of the road early, and when the truck starts driving, a large number would fly infront of the windshield to blind the driver.

  70. I'm not sure that's a bad idea... by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    But neither am I sure it's a good one. Farmers already do plenty of work -- tacking on beekeeping makes it that much harder. Beekeeping of 20 years ago was an inherently easier job than it is now; even if you discount CCD, there are mite incursions as well as "foul brood" issues that didn't exist then that are the bane of beekeepers now. I suppose it's a slippery slope -- what if your idea *did* "fix" everything that was wrong? That'd be great. But it would also be an honest-to-God pain; beekeeping no longer consists of putting bees in a hive and hoping they don't swarm too often. Each hive is a significant hit on both time and money; they now have to be carefully monitored and managed. And learning this stuff doesn't come magically, either: there are additional hits for time (and money) spent on training, e.g., college short courses, agricultural extension agents, etc.

    In a perfect world, I agree: your suggestion would be the right way to go. But I don't think you're taking into account the potential downsides and ramifications of your idea.

    1. Re:I'm not sure that's a bad idea... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Farmers already do plenty of work -- tacking on beekeeping makes it that much harder.

      So the farmer could hire a beekeeper to drive around and tend the hives in an area; just don't make him take the hives with him.

      Each hive is a significant hit on both time and money; they now have to be carefully monitored and managed.

      Sure, in a mobile-monoculture environment. But I believe that the bees could mostly take care of themselves if they were allowed to exist in a more natural setting, in the same way that organic farming techniques cause plant pests and diseases to be naturally regulated. (Or rather, that the bees should simply be regarded as a component of the biodynamic farm system.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  71. Don't ask questions by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that you answer in the summary.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  72. "BEE" smart: know the facts, stick to nature by eyenot · · Score: 1

    CCD isn't some mystery. It has already been solved. Over generations, bee-keepers have lost some of the finer points of bee-keeping, especially where there is an adherence to natural processes involved. This is understandable, given that beekeeping and honey cultivation are productivity-driven processes, intensified toward creating more product and not necessarily accommodating "bee nature". However, "bee nature" is directly affected by fungi such as nosema and cordyceps, and though their forefathers understood the necessity of such things as opening hives for aeration or "letting nature take its course" from time to time, the control-minded and productivity-driven behaviour of current beekeepers has them shrugging their shoulders over what to do. This has already been discussed at length, but you can look all over the internet and find discussions between beekeepers:

    "what do I do about my bees having constant diarrhea all over the nest, or fungal infections? should i use a chemical?"

    answer: "... open you hives and let them air out. give up harvesting, this year. check again next year. source... some latest findings by grant-driven scientific research? nope! some centuries-old book on beekeeping your grandpa probably had two copies of and probably never had to read once. maybe you should think about another line of work?"

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:"BEE" smart: know the facts, stick to nature by geekoid · · Score: 2

      " It has already been solved."
      no, it hasn't.

      What we have is a bunch of people who don't know jack about the subjects making wild guesses at what to do based on the preconceived uneducated notion of how the world should work.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:"BEE" smart: know the facts, stick to nature by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Come on Geekoid, you're not new here.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  73. Jeez guys ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bee careful !

  74. Fatigue by samson13 · · Score: 1

    I'd put a bet on driver fatigue being the main cause.

    Bee keeping is mostly a day time job except when you need to move a hive. If you close down a hive during daytime then lots of bees are flying and you get losses.

    The bee keeper is working outside his normal shift, drives for hours to the bees, spends half the night closing them down and loading them on the truck and then has to drive for hours to the new site hopefully before the sun gets too hot and cooks the closed down hives that can't really vent themselves.

    The bee keeper isn't really a professional driver, doesn't know the roads as well as a professional who would be more likely to be familiar with the road works. Tired and surprised so doesn't react appropriately so crashes.

  75. Parallel hex core bio-processors??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no modern OS that could possibly run on something so advanced, hence, all the crashes.

  76. your cost analysis makes sense by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Your cost analysis makes sense to me

    even cheap restaurants like fast food joints seem a lot more expensive than cooking at home, let alone regular restaurants or fancy places.

    FWIW, 14 pounds is 22 dollars or so. Could easily do a burger meal for 4 at home for a bit less than $10, about half of the McD's estimate.
    Homemade burgers taste much better anyway. :)

    Cooking even simple stuff like burgers yourself is a huge help in terms of both food cost and health.
    Pasta, pancakes and French toast are a few other examples.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  77. US law/politics? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    not allowing them to cross state lines would clearly fall within Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce.
    this is as opposed to regulations within the state, which state governments might involve themselves in to varying degrees.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:US law/politics? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Er.. my question wasn't so much about state-vs-fed power distribution, but rather why there's any motive at all to restrict bees' movement -- what problem does limiting bee travel solve? I thought maybe the original poster was suggesting that interstate bee trucks need to be eliminated in order to solve the problem of them sometimes crashing. That's an idea that was so juicily mock-worthy that I figured it had to be a trap.

      Someone mentioned disease containment; that's the kind of serious answer that I was looking for. Whether that would really solve bees' problems, I don't know, but it's certain not on-the-face-of-it stupid.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  78. Weird Al reference? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    "Judge Wapner, oh my, you gotta be Rain Man to like this guy." - Weird Al Yankovic, I Can't Watch This (parody of U Can't Touch This by MC Hammer)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.