Slashdot Mirror


Libya Elects Engineer To Acting Prime Minister Post

PolygamousRanchKid writes in with this quote from CNN: "Libya's transitional government picked an engineering professor and longtime exile as its acting prime minister Monday, with the new leader pledging to respect human rights and international law. The National Transitional Council elected Abdurrahim El-Keib, an electrical engineer who has held teaching posts at the University of Alabama and Abu Dhabi's Petroleum Institute, to the post with the support of 26 of the 51 members who voted. ... El-Keib emerged victorious from a field that initially included 10 candidates. ... He is currently listed as 'former faculty' on the website of The Petroleum Institute, which said he served as chairman of its electrical engineering department and lists him as an expert in power system economics, planning and controls." PRK adds: "Has there ever been an engineer in the top spot? ... Is this a good idea? Or are techies doomed in politics?"

188 comments

  1. Engineer in top spot? by moichido · · Score: 2

    Does Jimmy Carter count?

    1. Re:Engineer in top spot? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sheesh..I hope not.

      Likely one of the nicest presidents (Carter), but also pretty much the most ineffective...and in his later years, has turned kinda batshit-crazy....

      But nice guy tho...years back, I actually ran into him and his wife on Bourbon St....shook his hand, etc. I think that was back in the late 80s.

      Anyway, good luck to the new Libyan guy. I doubt he can hold those promises...if he does, I forsee some crazed eyed guy yelling 'Allah Ackbar' (or whatever the fuck they yell) and tries to blow him up.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Engineer in top spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Before him, Herbert Hoover was an Engineer as well. And I believe one of the presidents of Israel. Or maybe it was a Prime Minister.

    3. Re:Engineer in top spot? by sensei+moreh · · Score: 2

      I believe Chaim Weizmann, Israel's first president, was a chemist

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    4. Re:Engineer in top spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      China's Jiang Zemin has a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering.

      And now for a crass joke pertaining to Libya - remember that article that stated that engineers are more likely to become terrorists?

    5. Re:Engineer in top spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good way to go if you want a successful country:
      http://singularityhub.com/2011/05/17/eight-out-of-chinas-top-nine-government-officials-are-scientists/

      Congress 22 out of 535 with eng or science background.

    6. Re:Engineer in top spot? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 3, Informative
    7. Re:Engineer in top spot? by 32771 · · Score: 1

      (or whatever the fuck they yell)

      D{u|i|e}rka D{u|i|e}rka!

      --
      Je me souviens.
    8. Re:Engineer in top spot? by ArieKremen · · Score: 2

      Yitzhak Rabin was a civil engineer.

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    9. Re:Engineer in top spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but also pretty much the most ineffective...and in his later years, has turned kinda batshit-crazy

      [citation needed]

      I've heard the same thing about Reagan, but I wouldn't claim it as some sort of known fact, as it's a lousy argument and trollish. You shouldn't get your base facts from men who sell fear for a living.

    10. Re:Engineer in top spot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely! He can oversee the new regime's, sorry, transitional council's announcements to make Shariah as the basis of the law of the land, re-institute polygamy and other thngs that will make Libya an Islamic paradise like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan and Egypt.

  2. Which "The Top Spot"? by florescent_beige · · Score: 1

    Jimmy Carter was a nuclear engineer. I always thought it was funny in a depressing sort of a way that he chose to portray himself as a peanut farmer instead.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    1. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that he would say "nucular?"

    2. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No he was not. http://atomicinsights.com/2006/01/picking-on-the-jimmy-carter-myth.html

    3. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Informative
      That letter is somewhat deceptive, to say the very least. From Wikipedia:

      On December 12, 1952, an accident with the experimental NRX reactor at Atomic Energy of Canada’s Chalk River Laboratories caused a partial meltdown. The resulting explosion caused millions of liters of radioactive water to flood the reactor building’s basement, and the reactor’s core was no longer usable.[16] Carter was now ordered to Chalk River, joining other Canadian and American service personnel. He was the officer in charge of the U.S. team assisting in the shutdown of the Chalk River Nuclear Reactor.[17]

      So yeah, I would say overseeing a nuclear reactor shutdown/cleanup (including being lowered in personally to work on the reactor) qualifies him for, if not "nuclear engineer", at least "knows a lot about nuclear power." Which is just about "nuclear engineer", considering what most politicians/presidents know about the issue.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's funny, because our director oversees a team of developers, yet he couldn't write a line of code to save his life. By your measure, he can call himself, if not a developer, then at least someone who "knows a lot about developing", which is "just about the same thing". No, just no.

    5. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      James Carter was a US Navy officer in the nuclear power field.

      No, that doesn't make him a nuclear engineer.

      It makes him pretty knowledgeable about Naval Nuclear Power Plants, but most any Senior Chief in Naval Nuclear Power would have been at least as knowledgeable.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps you would like to address the comment of him being "lowered in personally". Why would a manager or other non-technical person be personally lowered into a reactor building to work on it?

      When a high priority change comes in, does your boss personally check out the source code and get to work on it?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Former Navy nuke here.

      Jimmy Carter, as with most US Navy nuclear engineers are not "practicing engineers" in the modern sense. Carter was an engineer in the 1800s meaning of the word (i.e. ship's engineer, train engineer or manufacturing engineer).

      That said, Carter and other people trained by the US Navy are incredibly good at what they do, and it is an insult that the word engineer has been co-opted by a bunch of people that want their bachelor's degree to be better than your.

    8. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He didn't say "nucular" but then he didn't quite say "nuclear" either... it was more like "nukiyuh" as I recall.

      I don't think he personally deserves 100% of the blame for the "failure" of his presidency, but he certainly deserves some of it. (They all do.) He presided over a rough time for the country with some unpleasant structural shifts underway. But in any case, he has been much more successful as an ex-president.

      As for Lybia, I'm somewhat encouraged by their choice of an engineer for this job, rather than a career politician or clergyman, or some other charismatic type. The last thing that country needs is a new "Dear Leader." They need someone who can learn quickly in a wide range of topics, someone who can make informed decisions with a minimum of tribal bias, and deal with the myriad problems of getting the country back on its feet again.

      Good luck to them! I hope they can make it work.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    9. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by treeves · · Score: 2

      To expand, as another former Navy nuke, yes Carter was a nuclear-trained officer on a submarine, but he was not
      *the* ship's engineer. Nuc officers serve as CRA (Chem/Radcon Assistant), MPA (Main Propulsion Assistant), EA (Electrical Assistant) and/or RCA (Reactor Control Assistant) before becoming "The Engineer", who is a LCDR and is outranked only by the CO and maybe XO. Carter, IIRC, left as a LT, so he probably served as 2 or 3 of the aforementioned assistant positions to the Engineer. As you said Navy nucs are sharp, knowledgeable, responsible people carefully chosen and trained to ensure safe operation of the reactor and propulsion plant. But I can tell you, I had a couple of ensigns for Div O who were pretty clueless from a practical standpoint, and I'm not sure they were much better as LTjg's or even LTs. Many of them (most?) have engineering related degrees, but I remember one who had a degree in forestry (?), although he was pretty cool.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    10. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Navy Nuclear Power School, Officer course, covered the core curriculum of a Nuclear Engineering degree in a six month window. Various US Institutions would accept a completion certificate from that course, with a College Transcript showing succesful completion of a Bachelor's Degree from another institution, and a handful of lab courses, would grant a Nuclear Engineering Bachelors Degree.

      Most Naval Officers didn't bother to do that unless they intended to work in the Nuclear Power field after they left the Navy. But it is fair to say that they were the equivalent of a Nuclear Engineer

      signed
      1985 Graduate of the US Naval Nuclear Power School, Orlando Florida

    11. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      If the code is toxic or radioactive, then yes. (For instance anything written in .NET)

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    12. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by Genda · · Score: 2

      Actually I would say he was an exceptionally bright man with a strong moral compass and a profound commitment to human rights. His one failing was hubris. He went from Governor of Alabama to President on the claim that he'd clean the snakes and vipers out of D.C. like some modern day St. Patrick, and promptly got his ass handed to him by the Washington establishment from both parties... Whoops!

      His energy policies were spot on. His commitment to alternative energy was spot on. His work on civil rights, from work to improve living conditions in the inner city to his attempts to rectify injustices imposed on native Americans was spot on. His work in garnering peace in the middle east was unprecedented. The work he did both in laying the foundations of SALT II, and establishing trade with China, ensured peace and made the later accomplishments by Ronald Reagen possible. His environmental programs were extraordinary, while at the same time working hard to ensure that nations infrastructure was being well maintained. His biggest failures the oil shortage (and ensuing double digit inflation) and the Iran Hostage Crisis were the things that brought down his presidency, and when he needed the Congress to help him address the mess that ensued, he was left high and dry with far too few friends there to make a meaningful difference.

      So at that level you are absolutely correct. His presidency was not a failure, the rough time were not of his own making and his failures to a significant degree were of his own making. All said, he is beyond a shadow of a doubt, the best elder statesman this country has today, and has consistently put his money and ass where his mouth is, by generously giving his time and wealth to dozens of vital programs to empower the poor, feed the hungry and develop a better world for all. None of our other ex-presidents has demonstrated the kind of personal integrity or dignity demonstrated by Jimmy Carter.

    13. Re:Which "The Top Spot"? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Except for the Alabama/Georgia mix-up, the rest of your post is right on the mark. Couldn't agree more. Another thing that blindsided him was that one cabinet secretary (can't remember his name) who got caught using cocaine. One of Carter's campaign points in '76 was his support for decriminalizing marijuana, but that whole agenda went down the crapper after the coke scandal. What a shame we couldn't have ended that idiotic policy 30+ years ago! But you're right, he came in promising to shake up Washington, and they stonewalled him.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  3. Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the record for humanities is horrific:

      Hitler was a painter.
      Mao was a librarian.
      Stalin was a preacher.

    Yours In Moscow,
    K. Trout, C.I.O.

    1. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by DeathToBill · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    2. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by janeuner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Compared to their predecessors, they are saints.

    3. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add:
      W got his degree in History (and obviously learned nothing).
      reagan got his degree in sociology (not economics as some now falsely claim).

      It would appear that some of the worst presidents of the last 100 years are nothing but liberals gone bad.

    4. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by sarhjinian · · Score: 1

      One the funniest things about Reagan is that he's the only president to have headed a labour union.

      --
      --srj/mmv
    5. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Aren't they wonderful?"

      If you consider what was necessary to move China into modernity and keep it stable, YES, they ARE "wonderful".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by Hatta · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, engineers aren't scientists. Engineering is all about learning rules and following them, not asking questions. Engineers are significantly more conservative than scientists, and engineers are often found behind anti-scientific movements, such as creationism.

      What we really need are scientists in positions of power. People who understand that the world is messy, and that you're wrong more often than not. People who understand the value of data.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by Code+Yanker · · Score: 1

      BAD engineers can be a detriment to science, but so can bad scientists.

      Engineers do understand data. We collect data, model the data, draw conclusions, make predictions, test those predictions, and use them to generate wealth. So except for that last part, we ARE scientists, just not PURE scientists.

      Many of us would love to do pure science, and we leverage pure science as much as possible to advance the state of our specific art, but while we understand the value of data, we also understand the importance of wealth. Or is that what you meant when you said "more conservative?"

    8. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by i_b_don · · Score: 1

      At best you're an engineering student who doesn't actually understand what an engineer does or at worst you really don't have a clue. Engineering is not about "learning rules and following them". Engineering is about understanding that the world is modeled in mathematics and that we use these models as tools to accomplish tasks. We design things, we test things, we build things. The only engineers I've ever met who just "learn rules and follow them" are bad engineers and they've certainly been the minority of engineers in the US.

      Engineers and scientists are very closely related. The only real difference is that scientists goal is knowledge and the engineers goal is a product. We both use the scientific method and statistics very often in determining the "truth" of the situation. Weather that "truth" is the reliability of a process or the speed of a nutrino, the process is the same.

      d

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    9. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 1

      OH, he made up for it by dropping names and testifying against the "subversives".

      --
      My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
    10. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Engineers vs Scientists - an Engineer is a Scientist with thumbs (but the technician really knows whats going on ) - I started in RnD as a Research assistant

    11. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      No, engineers are people knowledgeable in mathematics, physics|chemistry|biology, computation, experimentation, and design. We turn thoughts into hard reality. (Academic and sometimes non-academic) scientists...not so much. More interested in grand pontifications and intellectual masturbation than in getting anything done. All the data in the world is worthless if all you can do is write or talk about it.

    12. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by Genda · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ronny flirted with the Communist Party (according to a close friend who himself was sympathetic to the party though not himself a member), and the gossip at the time was that he was denied because he was considered a flake who couldn't hold a political position for more than about 20 minutes (and of course this is completely anecdotal, and there is no proof for any of it so please don't get angry or defensive, because its Hollywood gossip from the friggin' 50s.) Good thing for Ronny, the people who knew him, were good at keeping both his trust and his secrets.

      It was around the time of the McCarthy inquisitions and a sit down visit with the FBI that Ronny discovered where they parked they "Gravy Train" and became the best of friends with anyone who would pay him to sell their cra... er products. Taking "Product Spokeman" from television spots to the White House Commander and Chief is an impressive feat by any standard.

    13. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Heh, to summon someone else's /. sig... "1984 was not an instruction manual"

      But I think China's leadership suits their culture. Too bad you could pretty much say the same thing about the US's "dumb jock" culture as well.

    14. Re:Cheers For Engineers !!!1 +4, Informative by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      One of Reagan's sons (Ron I think) has confirmed that his father had Communist sympathies at one time. There was an excellent series on British TV earlier this year that gave "warts and all" accounts of a number of prominent US presidents, and the Reagan one included a lot of stuff on his early left-leaning views, followed by his swerve rightwards and collusion with the McCarthy crap. The biggest eye opener was episode covering Lincoln - far from the saint he's made out to be today.

  4. The basic way to fail.. by fallen1 · · Score: 1

    ..is because those not normally in politics are surrounded by people who wish to maintain the "status quo" and are fearful of change. Regardless of how amazing an idea is, regardless of how well it would work, those that are in power are afraid to lose it and stymie what could be real progress from an out-of-the-box thinker.

    Just my .02 microns worth.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

    1. Re:The basic way to fail.. by gman003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, but there's essentially a political vacuum in Libya right now. The "status quo" is practically anarchy - there's no politicians interested in maintaining it. So it just might actually work, there.

  5. Last premier of China by superwiz · · Score: 5, Informative

    was an electrical engineer (PhD).

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to wikipedia...

      The current president of the PRC was educated as a hydraulic engineer.
      The premier was educated as a geologist.
      The chairman/party secretary for the main (only) party was educated as an electric tube engineer.
      The chairman of the CPPCC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_People%27s_Political_Consultative_Conference) was educated as an engineer.

      I'd say that the Chinese know how to pick a politician, but all evidence suggests the contrary.

    2. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, the current Chancellor of Germany (our equivalent of the president, since the actual president is more like a decorative figure here) is a "Dr. rer. nat." of theoretical chemistry who did her diploma in physics.
      Her dissertation had the title "Untersuchung des Mechanismus von Zerfallsreaktionen mit einfachem Bindungsbruch und Berechnung ihrer Geschwindigkeitskonstanten auf der Grundlage quantenchemischer und statistischer Methodenâ which means "Analysis of the mechanism of decay reactions with simple bonding breakage and calculation of its velocity constants based on quantum-chemical and statistical methods."

      Which sounds pretty cool, huh?

      And she still has no spine, no freedom from false social conditioning, the pressure of the USA and lobbyists, has all the typical sleaziness of politicians plus the GDR boondocks "charme". Which results in pretty bad politics.

    3. Re:Last premier of China by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

      >>was an electrical engineer (PhD).

      The last time I checked, the majority of the senior rulers of China were engineers.

      So to answer the question of the summary, yes. Engineers have run a country before.

      This really does explain the development of China over the last 10 or 20 years.

    4. Re:Last premier of China by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the Chinese are doing a much better job of picking leaders than we are. When you consider where they've come from, and how far they've progressed in just a few decades, they're doing much better than the US is, and having engineers rather than lawyers in their government is probably a large part of it.

    5. Re:Last premier of China by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      This really does explain the development of China over the last 10 or 20 years.

      Concentration on sexy, l33t high tech projects while ignoring the growing rumbles of the people... Check.
       
      Seriously, China's main problem (now and for the next couple of decades) is the now threatened prosperity of their growing middle class. (Threatened both with the faltering economies of the West, and as the West looks to alternate sources of labor as the cost of doing business in China increases.) Look to Russia for an example of how that turns out...

    6. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem. China's middle class will be a market so large that the US will look tiny in comparison. So there will be plenty of consumers for the output of the Chinese factories.

    7. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I looked the 10 (?) member top committee of the Chinese government had only one member that was NOT an engineer of some sort.
      One of them had some serious dam building experience under his belt from memory, and several others were into fluid mechanics I think.
      (chaos management? :-)

      Certainly it may explain the different viewpoint that china has in a lot of ways, like "of course we need high speed rail".

    8. Re:Last premier of China by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The last time I was in China, the government came through with a bulldozer and knocked down all the illegal street vendors on the road, then stopped an arrow straight superhighway through it. This was in the middle of the BFE mind you, but they gave no notice to the guys running the stands.

      Was the closest thing I'd ever seen to SimCity in real life.

    9. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why they have 100-year horizons in their planning.

    10. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem a small group of Chinese are better at picking the leaders for the entire country, so lets switch to the same system!

      Will you be rubbing one out over India in 30 years? "Look how far they have come since 2011, people ride inside the trains there now, not on top of them. Look, they only kill 20% as many female babies as they used to 30 years ago, that progress! Why can't we lower our female baby killing rates as much?" Why not, one might wonder in the future? Some diminishing law or something? Something about returns? Hmm... I am sure an intellectual engineer type might be able to figure it out!

    11. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time I checked, the majority of the senior rulers of China were engineers.

      The current president is an engineer. The previous president was an engineer. The likely next president (Xi Jinping) is an engineer. Of the 9 people in the top of the politburo right now, there are 6 engineers, 2 geologists, and an economist (PhD) - and more importantly, 0 lawyers.

      On the other hand though, Ahmadinejad is also a (Civil) Engineer. /queue jokes

    12. Re:Last premier of China by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It would seem a small group of Chinese are better at picking the leaders for the entire country, so lets switch to the same system!

      Sounds like a good description of how the President is elected with electoral college votes rather than public votes. A president in the USA only has to get the majority of the electoral votes, s/he doesn't need a majority of the popular votes, though usually one follows from the other.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:Last premier of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reality, not really. Yes, the electoral college was intended as a "safety" to prevent the worst outcomes a pure democracy could produce, but it hasn't been anything more than a formality in modern times (or 'ancient' 200 year ago times either). So the electors have followed what the populace of their state has desired. That is a bit different than say 10 people picked from each state due to power/influence deciding who the next president is, with no input from the populace.

      Of course in the last presidental election in China, there was only one candidate, so "voting" was truly optional.

  6. A simple majority by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    You will note that it was 26 out of 51. I would say that he will have a difficult time passing anything. Hopefully, others will work with him, rather than opposed to him.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:A simple majority by TWX · · Score: 2

      26 of 51 with 10 candidates is actually quite impressive.

      That does not predict what will happen to simple pass/fail votes, but on the other hand, if he can continue to keep that barely-majority intact for a lot of pass/fail votes that don't require supermajorities, he'll do fine.

      Of course, he's an engineer, so he probably lacks in the social skills department, and that might be much worse for trying to maintain that minimal majority.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:A simple majority by v1 · · Score: 1

      When I read this I was wondering how many were on the ballot. if there were 10 on the ballot, this guy could easily have gotten triple the number of votes of his next contender.

      That's why runoff elections are good in cases like that, take say the top two or three from the first vote and then shake that out with one more vote.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:A simple majority by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The vote was 26 of 51, in a field of 10 candidates. I would say that is pretty good. That doesn't mean that the other 25 who voted for someone else are against him, it means that 49% preferred someone else.

      For example: Only 10% of Republicans would pick Ron Paul as their candidate against other Republicans, but over 90% would pick him over Obama. Vote tallies can be very misleading when you have 4 or 5 choices, no less 10.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:A simple majority by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Most run off style voting systems don't require a second poll if one candidate gets a majority of the vote in the initial run. If one person gets 51% of the vote and the other nine split the rest, the person with plurality (and majority) gets the seat. If one person gets 49% of the vote and the other nine split the rest, the person with plurality (but not majority) runs off against his/her top one or two challengers. It's possible they do it differently somewhere, but I've always seen it handled this way.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    5. Re:A simple majority by dskzero · · Score: 1

      Of course, he's an engineer, so he probably lacks in the social skills department, and that might be much worse for trying to maintain that minimal majority.

      Engineers =/= Nerds. Sure they might share some traits, but if you're an engineer and lack social skills, you won't get very far.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    6. Re:A simple majority by v1 · · Score: 1

      Most run off style voting systems don't require a second poll if one candidate gets a majority of the vote in the initial run.

      Agreed, the basic idea here is to be able to say that the elected official "has the support of over half the voting population". If you got 40% of the vote and the other 5 candidates got 5,5,10,10,30%, you do a runoff and that forces the ones that voted in the 5 and 10% camps to pick a side that has stronger support of the people.

      It's still possible of course for that 30% candidate to win the runoff though depending on how the votes were divided. The reason its normally the cutoff is that even if all the people that didn't vote for you got behind one candidate you would still win. But voters are fickle, it's quite possible a few percent of people that voted for you did so because they didn't expect their first pick to have a chance, and the runoff changed their mind.

      So I'd like to see a runoff on any election where the top taker doesn't get at least 60% of the vote and the next in line got at least 35%, let those top two run off.

      Lets say there was a result of 11 / 37 / 52, I'd like to see that ran-off. Even if it doesn't produce a different outcome, at least there's a good chance that a hunk of that 11% will peel off to the 52 camp, and will increase public support for the elected official. It's hard to perform confidently and with public support in your position when the press keeps talking about your "just barely enough to scrape by" victory at the polls. Or maybe you get 49 / 51 at the polls - but at least you know where you stand. If you end it with 11 / 37 / 52, you really don't know how much support you really have once you're in office.

      To clear it up, the reason I think 11 / 37 / 52 may produce a different result in a runoff is that in theory all 11% will vote with the 37, leading to a 48 / 52, BUT also some of the 52 may have voted for C because they really didn't expect B to win and didn't want any chance of A getting into office, so now they switch to B now because B has a better chance of winning and A is no longer a danger. (possibly leading to a 51 / 49 outcome?) I know it's not terribly likely, but likely enough I think.

      In theory, for large elections, I'd like to see presidential and gubernatorial elections fall into some second election if the turnout is very close (48 / 52 etc) and force some sort of public debate to see if issues can be clarified and widen the gap, but there's no chance of that happening.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    7. Re:A simple majority by superwiz · · Score: 2

      Of course, he's an engineer, so he probably lacks in the social skills department, and that might be much worse for trying to maintain that minimal majority.

      As a university faculty, he most likely does have social skills. And as someone how ran a department in a university he most certainly has political skills.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    8. Re:A simple majority by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      France is probably where you are most likely to see the winner of the first round lose the second round. It is conceivable that the National Front candidate could come first with around 20% of the the vote, and the other 80% of the vote is split between a very long list of other candidates. People either support and vote National Front, or absolutely hate them and will vote for any other candidate to keep them out, so in the second round, the other 80% will vote for the second place candidate no matter who it is.

    9. Re:A simple majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My brother-in-law, who is an engineer, says:

      How do you tell an extroverted engineer from an introverted engineer?

      When he talks to you, the extroverted engineer looks at your shoes.

    10. Re:A simple majority by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A better question would be, does TNC actually control the country? I.e., say, all those militias that worked together against Gaddafi - do they all recognize this government as theirs? Or is it going to be like in Afghanistan, where president is elected, but warlords who rule the country in practice are not - and who, at best, "respect" the president (and even then conditionally). Or, worse yet, like Somali, where the official government ended up controlling only parts of the capital at some point?

    11. Re:A simple majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but if he were a computer scientist, he could exploit game theory to his tastes.

  7. Stupid generalization by Hentes · · Score: 2

    There are several engineers some of them are good leaders and some of them are not.

    1. Re:Stupid generalization by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Though I know Slashdot is (in general) fond of technocrats, there's no evidence they are any better or any worse as politicians than anyone else.

  8. Iran is led by an engineer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ahmadinejad (Iran) is a civil engineer and has a PhD.... Doesn't keep him from spouting nonsense.

    1. Re:Iran is led by an engineer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahmadinejad does not lead Iran, he is little more than a figurehead. Iran is controlled by a theocracy that's led Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

    2. Re:Iran is led by an engineer.... by mrops · · Score: 2

      G. W. Bush (Jr) is not an engineer, and nothing keeps him from spouting nonsense either.

    3. Re:Iran is led by an engineer.... by npuzzle · · Score: 1

      He may indeed be spouting plenty of nonsense; however, I wouldn't be so sure about the legitimacy of his PhD. His PhD was in transportation engineering and planning (could it get even more nebulous?), while he was the mayor of a province (source).

      Set aside all the controversy regarding the abundance and legitimacy of PhD graduates in his entourage (source), as a PhD student myself, I find it hard to believe that he could complete a PhD degree in a reasonable amount of time while working full-time as the mayor of a large province (Ardabil).

    4. Re:Iran is led by an engineer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, that and he's batshit crazy.

  9. people will be puzzled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when they leave the PM's office with their envelopes still stuffed with cash, but with reconstruction plans scribbled on the back.

  10. US Presidents by janeuner · · Score: 1

    IIRC, the last two US Presidents that started from an engineering background were Herbert Hoover and Jimmy Carter. Depending who you ask, they were either awful leaders or they were screwed by fate.

    Both were defeated after one term by orators, who became legendary leaders in the US mythology.

    1. Re:US Presidents by dintech · · Score: 1

      Depending who you ask, they were either awful leaders or they were screwed by fate.

      You could say the same about Bush and Obama. Clinton is excluded because he was also screwed by his PA.

    2. Re:US Presidents by cashman73 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Would Thomas Jefferson count? Not exactly an engineer, and more of an architect, he is credited with designing quite a few buildings in Colonial Virginia that still stand today, including the Virginia State Capitol, the Rotunda at the University of Virginia, and his own home, Monticello. Though I think by trade, he was more of a lawyer and a statesman,. . .

    3. Re:US Presidents by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      First US president, George Washington, was a military engineer which is why Engineers Week is held same week as Washington's birthday (though now President's Day). Though engineering held a different stature as it does now.

      Speaking of engineering, I talked with someone from Romania and he said during before collapse of communism in east Europe, engineering was preferred major for college students. His father had a technical kind of job, like everyone who was employed by the goverment. After fall of "Iron Curtain" (Berlin Wall) preferred study was business. This person, a child during Cold War, is now a bartender for Princess Cruiselines (Sapphire Princess ship). As you guessed, whole family moved from Romania in the 1990s.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  11. who else was an engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saddam Hussein was an engineer...

    1. Re:who else was an engineer? by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. I can think of one by Stultsinator · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:I can think of one by kbahey · · Score: 2

      Essam Sharaf, the interim Prime Minister, has been a big disappointment.

      Initially, a lot of hope was on him to make things better.

      But as time passed, it turns out that he is too soft, and the military rulers do not allow him to have the authority to do things that are pro-revolution.

      Speculation is that a second wave of the revolution will happen, aimed at the military junta (SCAF = Supreme Council of the Armed Forces).

  13. Arafat, Hu Jintao, Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter by Tester · · Score: 1

    They're all engineers.

    It's not that uncommon at all. Also, the majority of the members of the executive committee of the communist party of China (the center of power in China) are eng. too.

    Engineering tends to attracts the best and the brightest in dictatorship as it's seen as safer profession where there is less risk of angering the regime. And well, law of example is less important when you have mostly political trials..

    1. Re:Arafat, Hu Jintao, Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Gulash communism, dissenters were banned from humanities but were allowed in engineering.

  14. Herbert Hoover... by tomhath · · Score: 1

    was a mining engineer. His administration took a lot of the blame for the Great Depression, but it was really the result of a bubble from a former administration popping, same as the Great Recession we're in now.

    1. Re:Herbert Hoover... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Harding's and Coolidge's policies are what lead to the great depression, but Hoover did very little once it was popping. In many ways, his policies were similar to Obama's: lead around by CONgress.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Herbert Hoover... by joggle · · Score: 1

      Except that Hoover was very reluctant to pump money into the economy or try in anyway to save the banks. That's a pretty huge difference. There's also a pretty big difference between the depression that resulted from Hoover's actions (or inactions) and today's recession.

    3. Re:Herbert Hoover... by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's even been suggested that in some ways becoming President of the United States was a step down in Hoover's career. He had already written the standard textbook used for mine engineering, invented a new way to extract zinc from what was thought to be waste ore (basically creating Australia's zinc industry from a pile of junk), written the standard translation an important Latin work on metallurgy, and was involved in helping the US military during the Boxer Rebellion. His entry into politics was leading massive efforts to feed people affected by WW I throughout Europe and Russia, creating the Hoover Institution, and more-or-less created the modern US Department of Commerce out of what had been a fledgling organization.

      And then he became president and screwed up royally, mostly because his economic advisers didn't how to combat recessions: Contrary to popular belief, he responded to the crash immediately, working feverishly to try to keep the US federal budget balanced via a combination of taxation and austerity measures, on the advice of his economic advisers who told him that this would restore confidence to the markets (sound familiar?).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Herbert Hoover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History doesn't repeat; but it rhymes. Some economists say that getting off the international gold standard tended to get a country out of the Great Depression faster. Today we have an international dollar standard. Ooops...

      Note, this isn't an indictment of gold or fiat. The idea is that when an economic system using a particular medium of exchange enters a terminal state; you kill -9 the economic system by abandoning its medium of exchange. It doesn't matter if it's metal or fiat.

      The goldbugs on Slashdot will surely find a way to hate this idea--while it suggests that gold is a potential replacement for the dollar, it also suggests that any number of other things are a replacement for gold when that system inevitably crashes also.

    5. Re:Herbert Hoover... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, he responded to the crash immediately, working feverishly to try to keep the US federal budget balanced via a combination of taxation and austerity measures, on the advice of his economic advisers who told him that this would restore confidence to the markets (sound familiar?).

      It sure does, but so does runaway inflation by government printing money, or building up huge deficits that will be defaulted on. I don't see any solid, good answers coming out of either camp.

    6. Re:Herbert Hoover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then he became president and screwed up royally, mostly because his economic advisers didn't how to combat recessions: Contrary to popular belief, he responded to the crash immediately, working feverishly to try to keep the US federal budget balanced via a combination of taxation and austerity measures, on the advice of his economic advisers who told him that this would restore confidence to the markets (sound familiar?).

      Which shows you that even when the government has the defined powers to do what is necessary to prevent problems, we're still stuck with a human being making a decision... and, it's always within a political context. So, we're guaranteed to get suboptimal results, even with the right tools in place. No one wants to push the button and make a big decision in politics.

  15. Not a bad idea actually by sandytaru · · Score: 2

    Considering that one of the crisis Libya faces involves oil production and gaining control of the resources generated from it, having an engineer who knows the industry is quite possibly the smartest decision they could make. Much of the corruption of the old Libyan government involved the oil production industry and misappropriation of profits by the companies that drill there. Hopefully this dude is honest and will help put an end to the worst of the oil abuses.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Not a bad idea actually by Xphile101361 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because having a President from the great state of Texas stopped America's problem with oil corruption....

    2. Re:Not a bad idea actually by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Not that he was an engineer by any meaningful definition of the term...

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  16. Tukmenbashi was an electrical engineer. by gyepi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Turkmenbashi, aka Saparmurat Niyazov was an electrical engineer. Arguably was a pretty bad idea to let him get that position.

    --
    Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
    1. Re:Tukmenbashi was an electrical engineer. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I propose a new rule modeled after Godwin's law: Turkmenbashi invocation. If something was instituted as a Turkmen policy between 2 November 1990 and 21 December 2006, it's automatically a bad or laughable idea.

      (And now we wait for someone to complain about the generalization with a specific example of a good policy, thereby missing the joke.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  17. Oh no.... by Foxhoundz · · Score: 1

    Dr. Ian Malcolm: God help us; we're in the hands of engineers.

  18. some countries most males major in "engineering" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Of the the few that attend college. Its family pressure on sons. In response, college rename many more majors as "engineering" than in the US. Almost everything vocation, business, architecture, computing is called engineering.

  19. Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad , the current president of Iran, is a civil engineer.

  20. Doesn't really matter by poity · · Score: 1

    When you don't have absolute power and need to get things done, you have to build a coalition. But building such a coalition requires compromise, often moral compromise. Thus if you're not a politician when you enter government, you will become one soon enough, if not by desire then by necessity.

    Don't get me wrong, dictatorships and oligarchies are far worse, but having someone with technical ability in politics won't make any difference -- what makes a difference is some with a clear sense of values and the ability to project it, and that's not a trait exclusive to any field of study.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:Doesn't really matter by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      What one politician considers values, another considers oppression.

    2. Re:Doesn't really matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coalition requires compromise, often moral compromise

  21. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was a civil engineer. How's that working out for Iran?

  22. Ability by deblau · · Score: 1

    I trust an engineer's ability to do politics about as much as I trust a politician's ability to do engineering.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    1. Re:Ability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want someone in power who knows how to "do politics?"

  23. Almost all of china leaders are engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and look how "bad" is their economy ...

    1. Re:Almost all of china leaders are engineers by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most of that was done by cheating. It is easy when you get one side to play by a set of rules, that you then break your word on constantly. The trick is to not rile up the other side and offer up all sorts of BS reasons on why you continue to break the rules.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  24. uhh Iran? by as_ntg · · Score: 1

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Civil Engineering undergrad, PhD in Transportation Engineering. I am surprised I do not readily see his name yet. Though his actual level of power in Iran may be disputed he is certainly one of the most high profile engineers in politics that I know of.

  25. longtime exile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key word is actually longtime exile.

  26. Dilbert as CEO? by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    I think Scott Adams pretty much covered this all the way back in 1991... The week of November 4th thru November 11th to be specific. I guess now we get to watch and see if reality imitates art, yet again...

  27. Desertification of politics .... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    In the Middle East, dictatorships made sure that no one can emerge as a competitor to the incumbent tyrant, and that has gutted two generations worth of politicians. Either they become servile to the tyrant, or they are eliminated (physically, politically, socially, or otherwise ...)

    Also, remember that this is a transitional government still. He has not been elected by a public ballot. That will take around 8 months to happen.

    Outside of the USA, there are lots of engineers, doctors, university professors, ...etc. who make it to be top political post.

    It will take time to built a political cadre again in these countries, and many will be professionals, not only managers or lawyers.

  28. Manmohan Singh - Not Engineer, but PhD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indian Prime Minister.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manmohan_Singh

  29. Peanut farmer, preacher, engineer by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Carter had been greatly influenced by a sermon he had heard as a young man, called, "If you were arrested for being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?"
    Jimmy Carter is a, let's say,"complex" subject.

    In the real axis he's a nuclear engineer. In the imaginary axis he's a Baptist preacher.

     

    1. Re:Peanut farmer, preacher, engineer by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      "I donno, I usually get rid of the evidence well", would have been my response if I had been asked the same question (though I suspect it might have been rhetorical)

  30. NYC Mayor Bloomberg by Demogoblin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NYC Mayor Bloomberg: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg
    EE from Johns Hopkins

    John Sununu Sr.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_H._Sununu
    John Sununu Jr: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_E._Sununu
    Both MechE's from MIT

  31. German chancellor is Physicist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why we include blurbs like this in summaries: "Has there ever been an engineer in the top spot? ... Is this a good idea? Or are techies doomed in politics?"

    You can start here: The German chancellor is a doctoral Physicist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel#Early_life

    And there are others. Maybe you are asking why engineers have a lower representation then lawyers? Sounds like an interesting question. Why don't you do some research and come back when you got something meaningful to discuss?

  32. Angela Merkel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Angela Merkel, head of government aka Chancellor of Germany, a physicist.

  33. Branko Crvenkovski - Prime Minister and President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Branko Crvenkovski served as Prime Minister, and later as President, of the Republic of Macedonia.

    In 1986 he obtained a bachelor's degree in Computer Science and Automation from the School of Electrical Engineering at the St. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.

  34. from what ive gathered based on slashdotters by nimbius · · Score: 1

    it seems like tons of other countries have hired post-graduate level engineers to run their countries and for the most part its turned out okay.

    here in america i cringe at the thought of an intellectual or scientist leading the nation. they would predictably be branded an out of touch elitist.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  35. Herman Cain? by timchampion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Herman Cain has a Masters in Computer Science from Purdue. Not in charge, but leading the Republican pack as of this writing.

    1. Re:Herman Cain? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      and a B.S. in Math.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    2. Re:Herman Cain? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      As a geek I've never been so conflicted.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  36. Most common professions for politicians by while(true) · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to this article from The Economist the most common background for politicians word wide is Law (surprise!) and then comes (in order) Business, Diplomacy, Military, Journalism, Economics, Medicine, Academia, and Engineering.

    Almost 20% of the politicians had a Law background while about 7% had an Engineering background.

    1. Re:Most common professions for politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and union officials?

  37. Hoover and Carter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Herbert Hoover graduated from Stanford with a geology degree and became a mining engineer on the job. Even brief biographies make it clear he was skilled in the technology of the time.

    Let's face it, we want our Presidents to wheel and deal, cajole, compromise, maneuver, and most important, Get Things Done. Carter and Hoover clearly brought engineers' mindsets to their terms because they were problem solvers. This limited them but it's not hard to make the case it also made them excellent ex-presidents. Hoover organized food relief in Germany after World War II. Carter has worked for fair elections worldwide.

    Being an engineer doesn't necessarily disqualify a person for high political office, but never forget that a good engineer has a narrower focus than a good politician.

  38. Citizen Engineer by trolman · · Score: 1

    Much akin to the 80's and 90's where everyone was slapped with an engineer title. I was a Customer Engineer for a while but in reality an electronics technician. So an EE can now be a Citizen Engineer. Wonder who he knows/is related?

  39. Try China by Trubacca · · Score: 1

    China's current premier has a background in both geology and engineering. His predecessor was an electrical engineer. I don't know how that affects their political capability or decision-making, but I have difficulty seeing the skills and thought processes of an engineer translating well into the leadership of a global super-power. On the other hand, I don't think our politicians have much aptitude in that regard either, so who am I to judge? Different cultures have different leadership requirements, perhaps a state in the midst of reconstruction really needs an engineer to get their infrastructure back online.

  40. A potential one for the US by jmyers · · Score: 1

    Herman Cain is not president yet, but he has a master’s degree in computer science

    http://www.hermancain.com/about

  41. Angela Merkel by Plasmaphysiker · · Score: 1

    Merkel was a physicist before getting swept into politics around the time of reunification.

  42. Meanwhile, our country is run by lawyers by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

    So it appears that it's quite common that engineers and scientists run foreign countries. It's only we Americans who find this noteworthy, because our country is almost always run by lawyers - and I don't just mean our presidents. Sixty of our 100 senators are former lawyers. I can't help but think that lawyers have a very different approach to leadership than do scientists and engineers, and the thought doesn't exactly fill me with confidence. I'm not saying that lawyers can't be good and wise leaders. But what I am saying is that when government becomes an institution of lawyers, they inevitably import the institutional culture of lawyerism into government. Maybe that's why their governing feels more like a shifting battle of prosecution v. defense (though the sides occasionally change) where most of the energy is devoted to matters of procedure, rhetoric, strategy and "winning" rather than just doing the right thing for the country. Lawyers are people who are used to working on behalf of paying clients, and they must defend those clients to the hilt, not caring about whether they are actually right or wrong. That's as it should be. Now, of course the lawyers who move into government will tell you that "the American people" are their new clients, but in effect, I think it's the paying interest groups who buy our governing lawyers. So government is a battle of interest groups, each armed with a paid group of politician-lawyer-advocates who are expected to not worry about who's actually right. Their job is to win, or at least to keep "the other side" from winning. My foreign friends often ask my why the US only has two viable political parties. Could it be that because in the courtroom there are only two sides, and our politicians couldn't wrap their heads around a system that works differently? I feel like when the history of the decline of our country is written, something like this will be a part of the analysis.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, our country is run by lawyers by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      I agree. Lawyers are trained to argue an opinion regardless of its validity. People who learn to debate are rewarded on their ability to argue, not on whether or not they are right. It shouldn't be surprising, then, that we are surrounded by people in government and politics promoting ideologies and denying facts all the time.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, our country is run by lawyers by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      My foreign friends often ask my why the US only has two viable political parties. Could it be that because in the courtroom there are only two sides, and our politicians couldn't wrap their heads around a system that works differently?

      damn, perhaps that is why only two parties (plaintiff and defendant), good observation. Actually very insightful analysis. (hey, rest of you mod this guy up).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    3. Re:Meanwhile, our country is run by lawyers by ZouPrime · · Score: 1

      Lawyers are also trained to know, understand and work with the law. Giving that an important role of politicians is to create and modify laws, it's no wonder there's a lot of lawyers among them. The opposite would be surprising.

    4. Re:Meanwhile, our country is run by lawyers by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yup, its not like an engineer could do _worse_ then a lawyer. Bureaucracy has only one goal: to keep the status quo so that it survives. At least an engineer is more willing to look at the practicality rather the rhetoric and "cute" sound bites that don't actually address the root of the problem.

      We need to remove _all_ financial motives from [introducing] Laws.

      Every donation should be pooled, and at the end of every month, it should be split evenly to ALL the parties, to give ALL voices a chance to have their say.

      Agreed that we need to get over this "Us vs Them" mentality. An even more radical step would be to remove ALL parties and focus on the ISSUE, not the SIDE that supports/doesn't support X.

  43. I see a horrible new trend on the horizon! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    As colleges and university Political Science departments decide that perhaps they can attract more students if they renamed their major to "Political Engineering". Sadly, these same people that consider PolySci to be "science" are the same idiots that would consider it to be "engineering" in an attempt to artificially boost their salary above minimum wage and hope for a job that doesn't involve asking people if they want to super-size their order of fries,. . .

    1. Re:I see a horrible new trend on the horizon! by Dogbertius · · Score: 2

      As colleges and university Political Science departments decide that perhaps they can attract more students if they renamed their major to "Political Engineering". Sadly, these same people that consider PolySci to be "science" are the same idiots that would consider it to be "engineering" in an attempt to artificially boost their salary above minimum wage and hope for a job that doesn't involve asking people if they want to super-size their order of fries,. . .

      Not happening in Canada, fortunately.

      The title of "engineer" cannot be carelessly slapped onto any job title unless one is registered as a "Professional Engineer" (P.Eng). This requires a four-year degree program at an accredited university in an engineering program (STEM-based; science, technology, engineering, mathematics), resulting in a Bachelor of Applied Science (B.A.Sc.) or a Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng./B.E.). No artsy degrees count. This also requires four years of full-time work in industry, under the direct supervision of someone who already has his/her P.Eng. status, along with regular work reports, evidence of taking part in continuing professional development (CPD) hours (at least 30 per year if I recall correctly, which may be audited later on, requiring proof of registration at conferences, seminars, etc), and finally, an ethics exam. Why more countries don't have such strict rules in place seems quite silly.

      I must admit, it drives me nuts when people attempt to attach the title of engineer to make their job look more respectable. A few common examples:
      -Social engineer: fraudster, identity thief, con artist
      -Sanitation engineer: typically a euphemism for a garbage man, in most contexts
      -Political engineer: political science major who was had to take high-school level remedial math as a mandatory science elective

    2. Re:I see a horrible new trend on the horizon! by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Network Engineer - anyone that has configured BGP.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:I see a horrible new trend on the horizon! by Dogbertius · · Score: 1

      Hahah! Pretty much. There are some people who do some of the more advanced networking stuff (ie: deploying large-scale systems from Cisco or Juniper, etc), along with handling stuff like directory services, authentication, etc. That generally fits under the IT / sysadmin umbrella, and while it is technical and by no means simple, it does not categorically fall under the category of engineering work.

      Another one that causes much frustration is "audio engineer". In the US, it is effectively synonymous with "audio technician", whereas in Canada and Germany, they are not the same thing by any measure. The technician is usually the one setting up audio apparatuses for professionals, bands, etc, while the engineer is working on audio algorithms, maybe designing a new microphone using MEMS, etc.

      In any case, it's an abused term, sadly.

    4. Re:I see a horrible new trend on the horizon! by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Note that I did NOT shy away from the term when (back in the dot-boom days) Amazon hired me as a "Senior Network Engineer" for six figures.

      Note also that I'm a high school drop-out.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  44. Mahmud Ahmadinedschad is an Engineer too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what?

  45. Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Electing an engineer to a public office means exactly jack-shit. After graduating with an engineering degree, I can say that I've known plenty of engineers who were assholes, idiots, or both.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    1. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure all of them could say they've known at least one. Zing!

    2. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they would fit in just fine in government you're saying?

    3. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Olorion · · Score: 1

      And everyone knows plenty of lawyers who are evil and corrupt. Does that mean all lawyers should be disqualified from politics? Of course not.

      Now that we have China's successful example, we should at least consider allowing engineers to reach the top. An engineer as leader can be very good: the Hewlett-Packard company was founded by engineers and continued to be hugely successful while it was being run by engineers. But look at it now.

    4. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 1
      > Now that we have China's successful example,

      Where have you been, sinophile? China is late to the party - many, many other countries have had people with engineering/scientific backgrounds running the country or in significant positions within government. It is great that China is too, but they're hardly the first dontyaknow?

    5. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > And everyone knows plenty of lawyers who are evil and corrupt. Does that mean all lawyers should be disqualified from politics? Of course not.

      You know that old joke:

      Q: What do you call 5000 dead lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
      A: A good start!

      If you need a lawyer to understand the law, then the law is TOO complicated. e.g. The Tax Code. Want to eliminate all the loop-holes? Make it a simple: Anytime an item (valued over $1) is sold, then the government is to be paid 10% of the original cost.

    6. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Olorion · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be a sinophile to notice that China is by far the most successful example of a country lead by engineers. Other nations may have had an occasional nerdy leader, but as far as I know, only in China have the engineers completely and continuously dominated for generations.

      Which may explain why China has been growing so steadily despite the financial implosions occurring in the U.S. and elsewhere: engineers tend to cope better with reality than lawyers do. A good bridge stays up; and no amount of the sort of fakery that dominates American businesses these days can turn a bad bridge into a good bridge. I think it's high time the U.S.'s political and business establishments got a dose of engineering reality.

    7. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Olorion · · Score: 1

      LOL

    8. Re:Electing an engineer means jack-shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Engineers have never been disallowed from being the top.

      The only reason engineers rarely reach this mythical top, is because they're in the business of actually solving problems, as opposed to making other people solve the problem.

  46. Islamic banking & education expert by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    El-Keib is an expert in education and 'Islamic Banking'. He's the perfect person to introduce the kind of debt terrors the west are facing now in order to control and mine Libya.

    1. Re:Islamic banking & education expert by mjwx · · Score: 1

      El-Keib is an expert in education and 'Islamic Banking'. He's the perfect person to introduce the kind of debt terrors the west are facing now in order to control and mine Libya.

      Oddly enough, one of the tenants of Islamic banking is that you cant get into debt as we would consider it in the west (which is a form of bondage (slavery bondage, not sexual bondage)). This prevents the hardcore Muslims in the west from buying much land and prevents Mohamed Q Public in hardcore Muslim nations from buying much land off the rich and/or royal.

      That being said, not all Muslims are as "strict" (just look at Dubai). Also there are Muslim friendly loans, although I dont know how they work (Atheist myself).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Islamic banking & education expert by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      No, you are confusing debt with interest. Islamic finance allows debt, but not the interest on top of it. A debt can only be repaid by the principle. Interest is treated as something akin to the slavery bondage you mentioned above, and hence disallowed.

      What the Islamic finance allows instead, is a purchase of the item (you want the loan for) by the bank it self, treat that as *its* purchase price, add a mark-up on it like any normal seller would, and then sell it to you on instalments. You have to declare the purchase price and profit mark-up before hand, and you cannot put any extra penalties or any hidden charges (like late fees).

      There are a few other rules, but this is the relevant one, given your example.

      Islamic Finance is getting very popular in the west (heck, no wonder there is a section on Islamic Finance in my ACCA Financial Management paper), and plenty of Muslims avail there. And even an atheist like your self can avail it, because even if you don't like the religious bit, Islamic finance might make a lot of sense for you on a purely commercial basis.

      As for making the rules so that you can't buy the land of the rich/royals, that is absurd and untrue, please don't be misled by that.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    3. Re:Islamic banking & education expert by mjwx · · Score: 1

      No, you are confusing debt with interest. Islamic finance allows debt, but not the interest on top of it. A debt can only be repaid by the principle. Interest is treated as something akin to the slavery bondage you mentioned above, and hence disallowed.

      I sit corrected :)

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  47. Pol Pot would have been an engineer by Quila · · Score: 2

    If he hadn't failed his exams.

    But then it's his failing that made him perfect for the communist movement promoting ignorance as the ideal. The Killing Fields may never have happened had ol' Saloth been more dedicated to his studies.

  48. lets not forget these guys... by mschaffer · · Score: 2

    Yasser Arafat was a civil engineer.
    Oh, and that Herbert Hoover guy. He was a mining engineer.
    Leopoldo Calvo-Sotelo y Bustelo, 1st Marquis of the Ría of Ribadeo was a Spanish Prime Minister. He had studied civil engineering.
    H. D. Deve Gowda also studied civil engineering and was Prime Minister of India.
    José Sócrates, actually worked as a civil engineer and was Prime Minister of Portugal.
    And let's not forget Pierre Tirard was a civil engineer that became Prime Minister of France in the 19th century.
    I am sure there were a few others. Also, let's not forget those Roman Emperors who dabbled in civil engineering and architecture.

    1. Re:lets not forget these guys... by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 2

      Oh, and that Herbert Hoover guy. He was a mining engineer.

      That's putting it mildly. He apparently wrote "The" college text book on the subject and taught classes in it at university. (Oh and he spoke Chinese to some level.)

      --
      Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    2. Re:lets not forget these guys... by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      On the other end of things, Osama bin Laden had a degree in civil engineering.

  49. For a country needing rebuilding, he might be help by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of split, on the one hand, I think this guy will be good for physical reconstruction of oil infrastructure, water, power, sewer, roads, etc.

    However, having him as the very first PM might not work so well, because in addition to the physical aspect of reconstruction, an equally pressing issue in terms of having a clock which will run out quickly, is establishing a viable political system in the country - constitution, parliament, elections, etc.

    I wish him the best of luck with that.

  50. Angela Merkel? by wanzeo · · Score: 1

    While technically not an engineer, Merkel studied Physics in school has a PhD in Quantum Chemistry.

    You don't see many of those running for office in your hometown do you?

  51. germany (facepalm at slashdot) by acidfast7 · · Score: 2

    is this a serious question? Angela Merkel (Chancellor of Germany) After being awarded a doctorate (Dr. rer. nat.) for her thesis on quantum chemistry,[10] she worked as a researcher and published several papers.

    1. Re:germany (facepalm at slashdot) by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      yes Shes a scientist not an Engineer - Maggie Thatcher was a chemist as well.

    2. Re:germany (facepalm at slashdot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes her a scientist, not an engineer.

      And occasionally I wonder whether she understands correlation and causation. She claims that the Euro is so important because nations with the same currency have never declared war on each other. (Will Greece eventually declare war if kicked out of the Euro zone?)

      But that skips the question of how those monetary unions were formed - by trust after having been good neighbours for a long time, or by force ("protectorates")? The Euro was formed by political will to end the war zone that Europe has been for centuries.

      So I think that good Mrs Merkel confuses outer form and inner form, cause and effect.

    3. Re:germany (facepalm at slashdot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Margaret Thatcher studied Chemistry at Oxford too and worked as a research chemist.

  52. Anyone else smell the stink of the $$ behind this? by vaderj · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or is it just a little funny that former US professor and former hotshot in the oil industry was put in there? We borked up in Iraq, so lets just see if we can sneak this guy in to power in a country with a ton of untapped petroleum potential. While wikipedia does say that the level of education is commendable, they are 97% Muslim. How many nations out there that have such a high level of "citizens" who are religious, that has an engineer as King/PM/"President"?

  53. Portugal had them by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

    Portugal had a number of engineers in it's top spot. António Guterres, former Portuguese prime-minister and current United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, is also an electrical engineer. Another one is José Sócrates, former Portuguese prime-minister and President of the European Council, which is supposed to be a civil engineer but allegedly his degree was attained through shady backroom clerical works from corrupt business associates.

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  54. Yasser Arafat by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    was a civil engineer by training.

    1. Re:Yasser Arafat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* I suppose bomb making would count in this case.

  55. Margaret Thatcher by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    was a chemist. Not a good advert for them was she?

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  56. Yes there has by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, current president of Iran is an engineer. Margaret Thatcher, former prime minister of the UK is a scientist. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples.

  57. Stallman for president... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ,,, of China

  58. Ahmadinejad would like to play chess with you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad#Administrative_and_academic_careers

  59. Your post added nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Know this as truth before my post is modded out. The guy before you said EXACTLY what you said. What the fuck are you, an aspie!?

  60. Portugal - three at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The previous prime-minister of Portugal (José Sócrates) was a civil engineer (though a bad one, from what I heard). The one in the late 90s (António Guterres) was an electrical engineer. And the first female prime-minister in Portugal - in the 80s - , Maria de Lurdes Pintassilgo, was a chemical engineer (and, quite frankly, seems to have been the only effective statesperson of the three).

  61. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is too by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    He actually has a PhD in civil engineering (transportation emphasis) from the Iran University of Science and Technology. I'm not sure if he ever actually worked in the field. His biography lists some administrative positions, then he taught for a while, was appointed a provincial governor, and eventually mayor of Tehran. I shouldn't have been as surprised as I was when I first learned Ahmadinejad was a civil engineer. After all, I know quite a few uncivil civil engineers.

  62. Libya election of an Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While not engineers, Golda Meir, premier of Israel, and Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of England, were both Chemists.

    Both were quite successful.

    Also, Herbert Hoover was an engineer.

  63. UN High Com. for Refugees and former Portuguese PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    António Guterres, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
    and former Portuguese Prime Minister is an Electrical Engineer and was a Professor of Engineering.
    I believe he specialized in Signal Processing...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant%C3%B3nio_Guterres

  64. that's a bit rich.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... wasn't it ignoring international law and and human rights that allowed the US to invade and perform 'regime change'?

  65. New Law and Order by Katchu · · Score: 1

    They will move from Sharia Law to Kirchoff's Laws.

    --
    Keep Doing Good.
  66. China is run by engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why they are kicking our asses economically. They know how to write policy.

  67. Who'd you think was going to get the post... by Genda · · Score: 1

    Hello People... what part of "Oil Economy" are you not getting. Now that we've had our cup of "Instant decapitated Kadafi", its time to get down to business, and after spinning the big wheel, the business iiisssssss.... OIL PRODUCTION!!! go figure.

  68. Soekarno, Indonesian 1st President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukarno

  69. Better than a lawyer by cnxsoft · · Score: 1

    An engineer would most definitely do a better job than a lawyer...

  70. Eduardo Frei was Chile's President (1994-2000). by mfarah · · Score: 1

    Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle, a hydraulic engineer, was Chile's president from 1994 to 2000. He's widely considered a mediocre president at best, and failed miserably in an attempt to get reelected in the 2009 election. His engineering skills weren't a factor in this, though: his lack of real political weight (other than his name, being the son of the well-remembered Eduardo Frei Montalva, Chile's president from 1964 to 1970) and his lack of charisma and authority were the real reasons he wasn't a good head of state.

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
  71. Yasser Arafat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Graduated in civil engineering from University of King Fuad I