Slashdot Mirror


FBI Takes Out $14M DNS Malware Operation

coondoggie writes "U.S. law enforcement today said it had smashed what it called a massive, sophisticated Internet fraud scheme that injected malware in more than four million computers in over 100 countries while generating $14 million in illegitimate income. Of the computers infected with malware, at least 500,000 were in the United States, including computers belonging to U.S. government agencies, such as NASA."

41 of 57 comments (clear)

  1. Last Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Posted from one of the bots.

  2. Nice job Feds. Credit when credit is due. by bazmail · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes you just gotta hand it to 'em

    1. Re:Nice job Feds. Credit when credit is due. by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sometimes you just gotta hand it to 'em

      Other times, they just take it... :)

    2. Re:Nice job Feds. Credit when credit is due. by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      $378.4bn into "dollar accounts" you get a $110m "forfeiture" i.e. 2% of your bank's $12.3bn profit.
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs
      So strange how different parts of the US gov can find the cash and time to hunt cyber millions but fail to get a court to understand drug billions....

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Nice job Feds. Credit when credit is due. by d0cu · · Score: 1
  3. Operating systems stats? by agm · · Score: 2

    It would be interesting to see the breakdown of the operating systems the infected computers were running.

    1. Re:Operating systems stats? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Why do you say it would be interesting?

      The answer is such a given that your question is actually rhetorical.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:Operating systems stats? by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      The FBI info PDF on the malware ( DNSChanger) lists instructions for checking OSX to see if you're infected. It also mentions the malware changes router settings if they are still at defaults. I'm guessing it infects Windows and Mac, with Linux/FreeBSD/Hurd being unaffected as per usual.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:Operating systems stats? by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Link looks bad, I know. (pretty sure it's clean) That is an advisory for the malware in question (DNSChanger) affecting mac OSX.... so no, it isn't rhetorical. The time of Windows being the only possible infected system is past. Probably thanks to Apple's meteoric rise in popularity.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:Operating systems stats? by gsgriffin · · Score: 2

      This doesn't have to be an OS thing. Look into MiM and MitB and you'll see that it is now browser based.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    5. Re:Operating systems stats? by nepka · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but if you read TFA it says it affected OSX too.

    6. Re:Operating systems stats? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Nothing like this on the App Store ....

    7. Re:Operating systems stats? by buglista · · Score: 1

      they tried a Linux version but Network Manager kept on rewriting /etc/resolv.conf.

    8. Re:Operating systems stats? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --All of my browsing goes through a Linux-based Squid proxy with its own DNS settings, so I'm not really worried. Check it out, it's free:

      http://communities.vmware.com/message/1828477#1828477

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  4. 4 million? MASSIVE?!? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's like claiming the interception of one bale of weed at the Mexican Border is a Major Interdiction.

    Still, glad they're doing something. Every little bit helps.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. FBI stops DNS poisoning scheme by Compaqt · · Score: 4, Funny

    The FBI managed to stop MAFIAA from passing PROTECT-IP?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  6. hmm, need to read the FA by Seedy2 · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, so it's not about Skype?

    --
    Nothing to say here... move along
  7. Socializing the externalities by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see the breakdown of the operating systems the infected computers were running.

    Ah, we're all about socializing the externalities for the corporations these days. How much of this bill do you think Microsoft will pick up? How about 'none' so they have no real incentive to secure their products?

    Heck, it justifies a larger FBI, so they'll probably give them a metal for being so cooperative.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Socializing the externalities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      they'll probably give them a metal for being so cooperative.

      I'd like to give Microsoft a small amount of lead, not very much, but I'd like to do it as fast as possible. About 680 MPH fast. ;)

    2. Re:Socializing the externalities by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Difference here being the Linux contributors aren't making you pay for their software, right?

      So it's not really a fair comparison IMO

    3. Re:Socializing the externalities by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Then sue companies like Red Hat. I'm sure the folks here would be OK with that, right?

  8. Re:easier to kick infested machines off? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    you put an infected machine on the internet, and your connection is disabled until you have clearly demonstrated that you have fixed the problem.

    I used to advocate a messaging system whereby _anybody_ could send a (PGP) signed 'disable' message to an IP address to get the machine turned off at the router. Whether this message got propagated or acted upon would depend on the level of trust in the signer - not unlike BGP. In today's NAT world it might need to be a bit more complex than I'd thought about in the 90s.

    But I fear the time has passed for Internet governance to do this without the government barging in, and then it would be too tempting to shut down he political opposition, 'terrists' or the like.

    It's possible to run a safe Windows machine, although it takes more knowledge than it does for iOS or Linux say.

    I doubt it. There was a story yesterday that 60% of malware found in the wild has no AV-software coverage.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Of course, there are some remaining problems... by Arrogant-Bastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...because there are now 4 million pre-compromised systems in the field. It's a certainty that they are now all attractive targets for anyone clever enough to detect them and acquire control of them. I think chances are quite good that as you're reading this, more than one person/group is attempting that very thing. They'll probably succeed. And when they do, they'll use yet another C&C mechanism to organize them, harness them, and get on to whatever mischief they choose.

    Seen in that context, this announcement is just a PR exercise. It has no real significance.

    1. Re:Of course, there are some remaining problems... by plover · · Score: 1

      Reading Krebs' article on the topic, the FBI has partnered with ISC to help plan a substitute DNS to stand in for the people whose computers are infected, to notify the ISPs, and to devise a plan to help get their computers cleaned up. The bigger problem is it's a boot sector infection that they don't yet appear to have a way of safely removing.

      Personally, I'd rather disenfranchise them. ISC could stand up a substitute DNS server to resolve every address to a redirector site that sends them to a page on fbi.gov explaining that they've been hacked, and they need to bring their computer to a reputable dealer to have the infection removed.

      Or maybe they only do this on Tuesdays and Fridays, or for the first 10 names resolved. Just enough annoyance to get their lazy bones off the couch and take care of the problem.

      --
      John
  10. Your PC was worth $3.50 to the botnet by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Congratulations! The Botnet operators thought $3.50 (for them) was worth more than (probability you noticed a problem) * (all the effort and money it would take you to fix it.) Of course, if you're a typical botnet zombie host, the effort and cost were $0, plus a bit extra because your PC is running slower, but hey, you had lots of bogomips to spare.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  11. How to check DNS server settings on OS X by DrProton · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is good on Lion and Snow Leopard AFAIK: networksetup -getdnsservers Ethernet Wi-Fi

    This command has extensive help: networksetup -help

    I use networksetup every day. I have numerous makefile targets that change my network settings based on my location. I'm a a road warrior changing networks frequently and using a VPN and ssh to connect to the corporate network.

    --
    "Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens." - Schiller
    1. Re:How to check DNS server settings on OS X by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  12. malware infects 'computers` by microphage · · Score: 1

    "U.S. law enforcement today said it had smashed what it called a massive, sophisticated Internet fraud scheme that injected malware in more than four million computers in over 100 countries while generating $14 million in illegitimate income. Of the computers infected with malware, at least 500,000 were in the United States, including computers belonging to U.S. government agencies, such as NASA".

    Did any of these malware infested 'computers` run Microsoft Windows?

  13. That's worth $3.49 more than your geek card:) by EETech1 · · Score: 1

    Don't you have to be running Linux to have BogoMIPS?

    Wouldn't these machines likely be running a different operating system?

    Cheers

    1. Re:That's worth $3.49 more than your geek card:) by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Well, as BogoMIPS is a benchmark of processor cycles then yes and no, one still has those cycles on any OS. They just would only get measured in that specific unit if on linux.

    2. Re:That's worth $3.49 more than your geek card:) by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Well wouldn't ya know it...
      djwong.org/programs/bogomips/
      Someone did a Windows port!

      I stand corrected, my joke was not funny, or technically correct.

      Cheers!

    3. Re:That's worth $3.49 more than your geek card:) by billstewart · · Score: 1

      BogoMIPS is a measure of hardware performance. True, it's a benchmark mainly used by Linux, as opposed to WinBench or FPS-with-some-game, but that doesn't matter; we're not talking about the botnets exploiting a bug in the benchmarking program to get it to do work for them :-) But they're the current benchmark; I've also used machines during the years when we benchmarked in SPECints, in Dhrystones and Whetstones, and in MIPS, and before that (since "1 MIPS" was canonically the speed of a VAX 11/780, and I'd used a couple generations of PDP-11s, IBM mainframes, HP minicomputers, IBM System 34, and an IBM 403 whose speed was probably best measured in punch cards processed per hour), though these days I'm generally more interested in benchmarks like megabits/gigabits per second or packets per second, and in real Mbps vs. vendor-claimed Mbps.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  14. Re:Windows+Router attack, not OSX by elp · · Score: 2

    I read the link but it didn't mention OSX.

    Let me guess, a Windows turfer? Because you misled people into thinking it was OSX, and added 'Linux' compliment on to get votes.

    Instructions for apple are on page 4 half way down. Did you fail reading in high school?

  15. The computers seized were running by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

    FBI code named Magic Lantern (botnet) eeek!

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  16. Re:easier to kick infested machines off? by rdebath · · Score: 2

    I doubt it. There was a story yesterday that 60% of malware found in the wild has no AV-software coverage.

    Why should that be a surprise? AV software is installed on every vulnerable PC sold and even without updates it mostly protects against all the old threats. Even after that there is a pretty good chance it's infernal nagging for a credit card will get an updated AV installed, with or without a CC. The "mindshare" has been built, everybody believes that Windows must have anti-virus.

    But, as has been said repeatedly the AV industry is reactive (though they are starting to try to solve the HARD problem of being intelligently proactive) so all an attacker has to do is make sure that the initial infection vector is obscure. If the initial infection disables the AV it can then download anything; including corpses of old viruses to blame and new updates to run with. The result is that the initial infecting agent will probably no longer exist on the machine, either the botnet will have been upgraded to the most recent version, which isn't yet on the the AV list, or the initial infector will be hidden away to try and stop it getting on the lists at all.

    When I consider it, if I was in "the business", I'd be trying pretty hard to keep information out of the hands of the AV "white hats" and it wouldn't really be difficult, I'd just have to keep changing things to keep one step ahead.

  17. Oh, yeah? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BonziBUDDY

    If it's packaged nicely....

  18. DARE 2.0 by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    DNS Abuse Resistance Education and MacRuff, the Router Crime Dog.

  19. Re:Estonians? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    Article mentions that the criminals were estonians, but when I read the local news, yes I am from Estonia, I realized that all of them were actually russians. They just happen to have citizenship of Estonia.

    well, they are estonians. that they just happen to have estonian nationality on their papers makes it so. and one russian.

    or if you take another stance you might as well go around running and shouting that linus is swedish.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  20. Good for them! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Finally doing some good in the world, keep it up, feels good to the rest of us.

  21. Typical government by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Interfering in the free market.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  22. Re:easier to kick infested machines off? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Some ISPs do this, they'll redirect all webpages to a warning page if mass spammings are detected from your connection.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel