Slashdot Mirror


Failures Mark First National Test of Emergency Alert System

An anonymous reader writes "The first full-scale test of the National Emergency Alert System failed on Tuesday at 2 PM. Some radio and television networks did not air any alert, while the performance of others was inconsistent. 'Some DirectTV customers reported hearing Lady Gaga's "Paparazzi" play during the test. Some Comcast subscribers saw their cable boxes turn to QVC before the alert, while Time Warner Cable customers in New York did not see any alert at all.'" If you were tuned to any American broadcaster at the time, did the alert system reach you?

22 of 451 comments (clear)

  1. Government failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those words never go together. I am shocked.

    1. Re:Government failure? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Each failure is an opportunity to learn and improve.

      The real failure would be to not identify failures and not improve - then we'd have to be blasted about it by the sensationalist media, trumpeting how inept government is.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Government failure? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those words never go together. I am shocked.

      Yeah... except it was the private broadcast companies that failed to properly show the alert not the goverment.

    3. Re:Government failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have to say, I think an actual failure would be if it were during an emergency.

      As I say at work, this is why we test. Debugging finds bugs. That's kinda what it's for.

    4. Re:Government failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know what the word "Test" means, right?

    5. Re:Government failure? by neokushan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ^ This

      Testing for something and finding that the test didn't pass is NOT a failure of a system. It's exactly what it said - a test. Now they know where the faults are they can work on fixing them.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    6. Re:Government failure? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Government negativism has reached a questionable new high. Most often the criticisms are not even quantified (as in this story), not compared to private industry (where possible) (e.g. Social Security fraud), and not compared to historical or global norms. The economy sucks and the public is united only in being unhappy about it, in which they feel some solidarity, yet can't form a consensus on what to do about it.

    7. Re:Government failure? by smpoole7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      >private broadcast companies ... failed ...

      Been waiting for people would say that.

      The engineer at the local PEP (Primary Entry Point) in our state was standing at the transmitter site, watching the equipment, when the test began. He was on the phone with FEMA, as a matter of fact.

      The test never came through. The (FEMA-supplied) equipment never responded. As a result, most of central Alabama never even got the test.

      The failure was on THEIR end, not ours. We had done TWO statewide tests just prior to the national one and they worked fine. Don't blame us, dood. :)

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    8. Re:Government failure? by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey, you do know the difference between DEVELOPMENT testing and ACCEPTANCE testing, right?

      The national alert system is a product in development. This was a test to determine what is working and what is not working. You can simulate and test individual pieces all you want, but until you get the opportunity to test the entire system, you have no idea what links in the chain are broken.

      This country is full of fucking idiots that have no clue how engineering is performed. Just keep your misinformation to yourself and stop trying to make those around you dumber.

  2. Um... That is why it is called a "TEST" by cwgmpls · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tests are supposed to fine failures. That's what they are for.

    1. Re:Um... That is why it is called a "TEST" by DikSeaCup · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because there's a fiscal penalty for failure when it's found!

    2. Re:Um... That is why it is called a "TEST" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think you understood what he was saying. Hurricanes don't require a NATIONAL alert. Communities affected already receive regional emergency broadcasts. Same goes for tornadoes/earthquakes/etc. It is unlikely in the event of a nuclear/terrorist attack the government would alert the american public, since odds are it will either 1) Do no good and just cause widespread panic and be too late to allow evacuation or 2) Turn out to be a false alert and piss everyone off. Like the other AC, I can't see any actual use for the system. And this is totally ignoring that a radio/television broadcast alert system is going to miss a *LOT* more people than it did even 10 years ago as we move away from those mediums. Colleges have it right: an opt-in text message alert system that warns you of danger no matter where you are.

    3. Re:Um... That is why it is called a "TEST" by EdIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the geeks would be better off relying on their own form of warning system

      Yeahhhhhhh..... maybe not.

      I remember the Internet on 9/11. It went basically this way:

      1) IT people talking/screaming with other IT people relating information as it was happening. Information got *slightly* altered from one "hop" to the other.
      2) Mailing Lists and IRC channels on fire with reports about everything from aliens, aliens raping people, mad cow disease attack, the Russians invading on the East Coast, ICBM launch confirmed by a friend at an undisclosed military location, etc.
      3) Screams of, "But I have not gotten laid yet! It's NOT fair!"
      4) Fuck it. Meet me in Everquest. We're taking those bastards down before we die.

      The "Enemy" could not have created a better disinformation system if they tried.

      Facebook? Twitter? ... Farmville? It would be an even more glorious cluster fuck if it happened twice.

  3. Spotty by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was in the car listening to NPR for this. The NPR (WGBH) station did a nice little lead in story and switched smoothly to the test. As soon as it did I started jamming presets and none of the other station I had programmed got the test. Local Alt Rock station, local R&B station, and the other NPR station all failed to broadcast the test as far as I can tell.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    1. Re:Spotty by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the government is just being selective about who they save in the event of a catastrophe. Apparently, they believe that we will need NPR listeners in the post-apocalyptic world. Alt Rock and R&B listeners, they think they can do without.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Spotty by Phreakiture · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are different message priorities. I don't remember what the priority levels are called (it's been about eight years since I've been involved in broadcasting), but the options essentially allow some messages to be stored and rebroadcast later (with a limit on how much later). Higher priority messages go out in real-time; lower priority may be discarded.

      The radio station's EAS ENDEC is supposed to manage this for them. In the event of a top-priority message, it just takes over the airwaves in real-time. Middle and lower priority alert the engineer to the situation and let him/her decide when to send the message. If the message is not sent before the time is up, middle-priority messages will seize the transmitter and lower-priority messages will get dropped.

      I would expect this message to have been encoded with the middle option -- store it for up to xx minutes, then take action automatically if the station didn't do so voluntarily. This would result in it going out over different stations at different times, and that would be desired outcome.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    3. Re:Spotty by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was at my computer, with several browser windows and a couple of email clients open. My cell phone was right next to me. When the time came, my Outlook reminder popped up and told me it was time for lunch.

      Too bad these notifications don't reach those of us who don't rely on antiquated broadcast media.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  4. Oblig by 2names · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did not hear a test, but I did see a black cat walk by, then the same cat walked by again.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  5. Lost Channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The local cable broadcaster here lost approx 10 channels after the test, including CNN, FOX, and DISCOVERY. They all switched to the NAT GEO channel without audio for upwards of an hour after the test ran.

    In addition, the test video was jumpy, kept blacking out, audio kept dropping out, etc.

    All in all, if it had been a real emergency, losing the 2 major news channels would have been real motivation to start loading ammo and supplies and gassing up the bug out mobile. ;)

  6. Cox Communications by ClayJar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was watching the test on a friend's Cox Communications cable service, and they also switch to a shopping channel (cable channel 8) for emergency alert activations. Their cable system apparently is incapable of showing the alert on all the (digital?) channels, so they simply show it over analog shopping channel 8 and have a system in place to switch everyone to that channel automatically whenever an alert is triggered. It's a bit annoying if a test is scheduled during, say, an important football game... er... episode of Mythbusters... whatever. On the other hand, it is even more jarring than the alert tones, so you'll certainly know something's afoot.

    If you have one of their Motorola digital cable boxes, when it goes into emergency alert mode and auto-switches to analog shopping channel 8 for the message, the front clock display changes to "EAS" as well. If you're suddenly watching the shopping channel and "EAS" is displayed on the cable box *and* you have the wonderfully annoying (and intentionally so) alert tones, you *should* be able to figure out that now's the time to read or listen. At least, that seems to be the general idea.

    I did notice that I didn't get the alert over cable until after I'd finished watching it on OTA TV (and chatting about it afterward), so chalk up a minute or two of additional latency to the cable company.

  7. Re:Seriously? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fool! Without that alert, how on earth are you going to talk the closest girl to you into impending disaster sex?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  8. Terrible news by uncanny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some DirectTV customers reported hearing Lady Gaga's "Paparazzi" play during the test.

    The terrorists have won