Slashdot Mirror


Motorola Reinvents the RAZR

zacharye writes with news that Motorola has reinvented their popular RAZR clam-shell phone as an Android smartphone. The new device is 4G LTE-capable and 7.1mm thick, and it contains "a 1.2GHz dual-core TI OMAP processor, a 4.3-inch qHD Super AMOLED display, 1GB of RAM, an 8-megapixel camera with 1080p HD video capture, an LED flash, an HDMI-out port, noise cancellation capabilities, 16GB of built-in storage and a 16GB microSD card pre-installed." iFixit did a teardown of the phone, finding that the construction necessary for such thinness will make repairs problematic.

208 comments

  1. One simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many people actually try to fix their own phones? Even on /. I have to imagine that the number is low.

    1. Re:One simple question... by Calos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know a few people who have done LCD/glass swaps, that's really the biggest thing you can easily do. And it certainly beats buying a new phone...

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    2. Re:One simple question... by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like putting in a new battery?

      Call me when they make it as simple as it is with my old school RAZR.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:One simple question... by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd be more worried about heat generation than how to actually repair the thing. Sounds like it's very densely packed electronics, coupled with one of the fastest processors ever put into a phone. Even if the thing is 99% idle 99% of the time, that still runs the risk of the thing overheating at some point in its usable life.

    4. Re:One simple question... by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not as thin as the summary (or article) would imply - there is a big-ass bulge at the top of the device that apparently holds the speakers and camera. I don't know how they get away with selling as 7.1mm thick. They also made the unit wider than other phones with the same size screen, presumably because they needed the space. I haven't used one, but unless you have large hands, one-handed operation is supposedly difficult because of the width.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:One simple question... by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the Samsung Galaxy phones are about as simple.

    6. Re:One simple question... by Dr+Max · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter if it's harder to fix, it's made Kevlar strong and waterproof it's a lot less likely to break. I'm a bit disappointed in /. this is a month old story about a pretty cool phone (if the iphone had those specs we would never hear the end of it), and they don't even report on one of it's biggest strengths, it's really tough.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    7. Re:One simple question... by daw1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what she said....

    8. Re:One simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I haven't used one, but unless you have large hands, one-handed operation is supposedly difficult because of the width."

      I knew my shovel-hands upgrade would pay off one day.

    9. Re:One simple question... by mikael · · Score: 1

      It's known as "Systems-On-A-Chip". If you were to make the system out of standalone ASIC's it would be the size of a laptop or netbook. Put all the transistor logic like CPU cores microcontrollers, codecs, and hardware interface logic onto a single chip, add a small screen, you get a smartphone.

      Unlike a PC, specific parts of the chip only get power when they are used. Less power is needed because there aren't any long distance interconnects between ASIC chips. All of those help to keep things cool.

      On my old Intel laptop, just about everything from E-mail to web browsers and text editors can run without the CPU going over 60C. As soon as any floating-point calculations take place, temperature goes up to 90C+
      After 95C, the laptop shuts down.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:One simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually everything you just said is in the article... and on the first page at that!

      "The RAZR measures in at a mere 0.28 inches thin and increases to 0.42 inches at its love-handle the prevalent Motorola camera bulge. For comparison, Verizon boasted with the release of the Droid Bionic in September that it was the slimmest 4G LTE phone at 0.43 inches thick. There is no doubt that the Droid RAZR is exceptionally thin, but Motorola had to fit the internals somewhere. To compensate, the RAZR is also rather large, measuring in at 5.15 inches long and 2.71 inches wide."

      Emphasis my own, for those who missed it.

    11. Re:One simple question... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Depends which TFA we're talking about. The first link does not mention the "bulge", nor does the summary. The second link mentions the strange width of the phone, but again, no mention from the first link. You have to go to the iFixit teardown to see the dimensions of the bulge.

      I think the company, link, and first article are misleading.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. Repair a smartphone?? by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aren't they meant to be disposable? I thought you just threw them away when they became obsolete after six months.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never known anybody to just throw away a smartphone that works. They pack them away in a drawer, sell them or hand them down, but never throw away.

      My sister is still using a 2g iPhone with no intention of upgrading as long as it works.

    2. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thrown in a box is more like it... with a few exceptions such as kids (first timer cell phone or maybe just a better phone compared to the 'free ones' provided by cell phone companies?) or other people who like to salvage working things.

    3. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Nah, it's just in insane countries where political maneuvering has resulted in [the desired outcome of] labor being priced through the roof.

      Here in China, I've gotten several smartphones repaired. Mine, and those belonging to others. I've gotten my electric shaver repaired [twice], my laptop, the exhaust fan in my bathroom, my air conditioner, and probably others I've forgotten about. It's amazing what can be done when the mandated cost of labor isn't $35/hour.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure the old ones can do all that. And so can the viruses that live on them because the manufacturer and/or carrier won't update them. Oh, and you can't get the special headphone/charger/dock cords anymore. Might as well be obsolete.

    5. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 0

      I've never paid $35 and hour for a repair of anything. It is either free (I do it myself or "thanks neighbor") or the quote is like $75 an hour plus parts (nearly the price of the thing being repaired). I say quote because I have never followed through with a repair. I just buy a new whatever it is.

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
    6. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think I have had maybe 4 or 5 cellphones in my life. The EVO 3D I have now is the only one I ever paid for. The first one was free when we opened the account, and each one after that was passed on to me by my brother or sister. Both of them always get the newest "smartphone" that comes out so they always have one to hand down to me. And they have phones lying around to spare, as do I. So yes people put those things away and yes, at least some people pass them on to other people. But the only time I've ever seen somebody throw one away was on "Life According to Liz" on MTV, when "Liz" threw hers in the river because she was on a date with a guy.

    7. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by icebraining · · Score: 0

      Or when you can afford to buy food with half as much money. Cost of living in China is still way below the US, no wonder they get paid less.

    8. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. They quit making regular old usb cables to plug into my phone to charge. Same with micro-sd.

      Sure can't find any dock or headphone cables to go on that old original iphone either, nope.

    9. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by camperdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm still using a 10+ year old Handspring Visor. Unfortunately, it's literally falling apart, and I'll need to find a new PDA. Some of these smartphones look interesting. The various stores around here want to sell me a cell package first, and from there I get to choose a phone, rather than letting me choose a phone, then choosing a cell package. Is that normal? It seems backwards to me.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Let's question, for a moment, why food costs less. Could it have to do with the insane cost of labor in other countries? Let's not examine this inconvenient truth.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's question, for a moment, why food costs less. .

      Could it be because there are no regulations causing the producers to spend money to keep things clean and safe? Perhaps it costs less because it is full of lead and melamine? Or is that stuff just for export?

    12. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by cheeks5965 · · Score: 1

      contracts last for two years, douchebag. maybe you throw out your phones and then go for a swim in your vault of coins. fucker.

      --
      -- Flame me and I will happily flame you back. Bring it!
    13. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wait you guys have 6 monthly phone contracts?

      We keep ours for 2 years before we get given a choice of new phone for "free" from the phone company.

    14. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The RAZR was not even remotely a smart phone. In fact, if anything is deserving of the term dumb phone, it does. The original Razr was essentially one of the lowest quality cell phones you can imagine, with out-of-date technology and terrible software design, combined with a gargantuan marketing blitz (take a look at some movies and television shows, and even celebrity news articles, for the two years following its release).

      I actually owned one because, if nothing else, it was the nicest looking phone for the price. Using it was painful, though.

    15. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Cito · · Score: 1
      I have an old Iphone 2g that I jailbroke, installed XBMC bought some 3rd party cheap A/V cables and used the jailbroken app on Cydia called Display OUT that lets you use non apple video cables ran to my tv, since my tv in my bedroom is an old composite tv 27" CRT It works perfect as a pirate box.

      I also have utorrent remote control app on it so I can use a bluetooth remote control to download torrents on my desktop using utorrent remote for iphone, then stream the movies over the network from a shared folder on the lan with XBMC so turning an old obsolete iphone into a cheap western digitial WD TV Live plus box :)

      and with the ice plugin I can stream movies and tv shows just minutes after they air from http://icefilms.info/

      Best plugin btw, if you have XBMC get the icefilms plugin.

      turn those old smartphones into pirate boxes / media servers /utorrent remotes

    16. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      if you want inexpensive and reliable, i loved the Kyocera Zio - you can probably find it without cell service, and with cricket its 60/mo unlimited everything. Bottom line, the device is slower, but has a BEAUTIFUL 800x480 screen that fits in your hand, and that, and price, make it my fav. phone and most recommended, by me.

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    17. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      the thing was as slow as molasses! oh my god, just flipping through numbers was a royal pain. Looks were all it had - and we. the public loved it. Says more about us then the phone ;(

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    18. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Well, I want to beat the shit out of you, the annoying asshole playing music out loud, on your cell-phone, in public. You are truly scum. But I'm too big of a pussy to emulate two fictional spacemen. Or ask someone to turn it down/put on some headphones. Instead I'll rant on /. That'll show those miscreants!" There fixed that for you.

      --
      My other sig is a knife wound.
    19. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Same thing for me, but it's about assholes with 50 megawatts subwoofers in their fucking cars that can be heard 5 miles around.

      Target practice. Gives you plenty of time to set up.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    20. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by zoloto · · Score: 1

      I pity people locked into contracts.

    21. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by overkill1024 · · Score: 1

      I suspect you might be a victim of Verizon's firmware. They redid the software for their RAZRs and it exhibited all the symptoms you mention; the Motorola firmware is just fine were it's derivations. I know this because I spent 3 weeks flashing my Verizon RAZR to Altell's firmware. The difference is night and day (literally as well with the additional camera modes) well worth it for the number of years that phone lasted me.

    22. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      You need to price food in percentage of income then come back to me on how expensive food is in a third world country vice first world. l will give you a hint the US consumer spends less as percentage of incoeme and fewer hours worked to feed themselves and their family.

    23. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's not really locked in. We can buy out any phone contract. We just need to pay off the remainder of the phone in the progress.

      I pitty people who actually pay for their phones. Where I live pre-paid phone contracts are overpriced. I used to pay $30/month for $30 worth of calls, and 60 free txt messages. Now I pay $30/month, I got a free smartphone, and $180 worth of calls at the same rate as previously.

      If my phone were to drop into the toilet today I would have to pay about $200 to buy out the remainder of my contract and I'd get a choice of new phone next month.

    24. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Yeah and more than 10% of their farmland if poisoned with heavy metals! Yay free market! That invisible hand really works huh?

      I just love how many crazies out there say "We should be competing with China, get rid of the regs!" while kinda glossing over the fact that a Chinese person living in the city will ingest more toxins in a week than we do in a year.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by vaporland · · Score: 1

      thanks for that link to icefilms!

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    26. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really using China as an example in what seems to be a personal vendetta against the free market?

    27. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by ksandom · · Score: 1

      I'd go a step further to say that there were many different models of the RAZR. I have one of the higher end ones (second hand) and it easily keeps up with moden phones.

      And functionality wise it does pretty well too. It's easy to teather, browse (I use opera) and run Java applications.

      The OP may not like their phone, but if you read the wikipedia page, you can see the original RAZR easily makes it into the definition of a smart phone.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    28. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still using a 10+ year old Handspring Visor.

      Tits or GTFO

      -@|

    29. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Cito · · Score: 1

      very welcome! icefilms is freaking epic, they've been up 4 years so far (knock on wood) nothing is permanent, but its great to stream to television with, instead of messing with torrents just direct stream it to pc/mobile/tv easy peasy

    30. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanted just a simple phone that fitted nicely in a pocket and could survive being dropped off roofs it was quite good.

    31. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Are you really using China as an example in what seems to be a personal vendetta against the free market?

      Why not? in many ways china is much closer to raw capitalism than Western Countries. The idea that China is some sort of communist society is laughable.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by FranktehReaver · · Score: 1

      My first Razr was the original flip phone one way back when it first launched. I remember thinking it was pretty sweet then by the time my 2 years was up I hated the thing so much. The day I got my new phone I was at work and I took my Razr and dropped a steal I Beam on it from over my head it exploded it to thousands of pieces. Only after a squeal of delight and maniacal laughter did I realize that I forgot to have my contacts swapped over to my new phone.... Crap.... lol ahh youth.

    33. Re:Repair a smartphone?? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Just be rude when salespeople play stupid games like that. Flat out say that you're going to choose the phone first, and then say that because you're the customer, you get to buy what you want and not what they tell you to buy.

  3. Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know whether to be impressed by their gall or appalled at their ignorance. More likely the latter; to the marketing types who come up with this kind of gimmick, anything that happened more than five minutes ago is one with Ninevah and Tyre.

    (And yes, I know it was 11:00 in 1918. Somehow that makes this worse, not better.)

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  4. HDMI? by Renraku · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want HDMI on their phones? Are the phones really powerful enough to output an HD signal to TVs that people would want to watch?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:HDMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im assuming its so you can easily show videos/pics youve recording on the device?

    2. Re:HDMI? by kingcool1432 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    3. Re:HDMI? by LilWolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Simply put, yes.

      My HTC Desire Z plays the 720p videos it records beautifully on a big TV. No reason why similar things can't be achieved with 1080p.

    4. Re:HDMI? by john.r.strohm · · Score: 4, Informative

      With "a 1.2GHz dual-core TI OMAP processor, 1GB of RAM, an 8-megapixel camera with 1080p HD video capture, 16GB of built-in storage and a 16GB microSD card pre-installed", off the top of my head I'd say "Dern tootin' it is powerful enough!"

      It hasn't been that many years since that would have been a supercomputer filling a large room, doing really nice ray-traced imagery. It is a fairly respectable desktop machine even today, except for the small disk drive. (And multi-gigabyte disk drives haven't been around THAT long.)

      A cluster of those puppies, with a big disk server attached, would probably be really nice for doing, uhhh, "stellar lifecycle modeling" on the cheap.

    5. Re:HDMI? by Nyall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes they are powerful enough.
      Second, some people want to use their tv as a slide show projector.
      Third, its an extra feature for those people out there who shop based on feature lists.
      Fourth it creates a need for people to buy a mini HDMI to full size converter. Even if its just to experiment with and never use again.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    6. Re:HDMI? by Spirilis · · Score: 2

      As mentioned, yes, but additionally these things have "WebTop" which is some ARM-compiled distro of Ubuntu with firefox and maybe a few others running on that HDMI port. Looking at a ps listing on one of these you'll see "/usr/bin/Xorg" running.

      --
      the real at&t mix
    7. Re:HDMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Are the phones really powerful enough to output an HD signal to TVs that people would want to watch?

      Well, given that it can record at 1080p, it doesn't seem surprising that it can output a "signal" at the same rate. Let's not get over ourselves, though, we're only talking a 2 MP frame (1920 x 1080 = 2,073,600).

      Now, do I want to watch your amateur home video, recorded through a shitty dirty lens, hand-held with crappy sound? No. Not unless we're talking some heavy Rodney King style police brutality which you just witnessed. In that case, it'd better be uploaded to five different servers before anybody watches it off the phone.

      So answer is still: No.

    8. Re:HDMI? by friedman101 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them

    9. Re:HDMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, it's not as impressive as you seem to think. Even with both cores that CPU is not even equivalent to a 10-year-old 800 Mhz Pentium III (back then 1GB of RAM was common as well).

      You have to keep in mind that these are low power consumption devices so even at 1.2 Ghz they're really damn weak compared to modern desktop CPU's.

      Even compared to 80's technology, other than size, they're not that impressive. Size is a big thing though, not the computing power.

    10. Re:HDMI? by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      Not only are they powerful enough, they're getting even more powerful (well, as I'm sure you guessed...).

      The iPhone 4 and higher end Android phones are capable of 3D graphics performance that can look like a current-generation console (concessions are made, but clever design can make that non-obvious), and they do it at nigh-HD resolutions. In just a short couple of years, we're going to have phones that meet or beat the consoles currently attached to TVs. Certainly, more powerful consoles will be out by that time, but we're getting to the point where not as important--and it'll probably be even less important when a person can have a game on their phone and TV. There are a lot of other issues there (controls, conveniently attaching a phone to a TV, what to do with calls), but there are the beginnings for answers to those right now, and it'll be answered fairly well when it becomes a more practical possibility.

    11. Re:HDMI? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I assumed it would be for watching streamed video, or fully downloaded movies that you transferred from your PC.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:HDMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the HDMI port on my G2x all of the time to watch 1080p videos on my TV.

    13. Re:HDMI? by sdguero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think you can really compare a 4th gen TI OMAP processoer with a built in GPU and ARM instruction set to an Intel PIII with MMX/SSE instruction sets.

      However, if we look at raw flops... The TI in a RAZR is capable of 4.8Gflops, a little less than 1/2 a P4 at 3.0Ghz and around 4x that of a 1Ghz PIII (don't have exact numbers on me, but the PIII was first processor to break 1Gflop barrier). And if you consider power requirements, heat signature, and cost per unit, the disparity is far greater. Back ins 2000, 1Gflop cost about $1000 in computing hardware. As we approach the year 2012, 1Gflop cost is nearing $1 of hardware (and huge savings in power usage). That is pretty amazing to me.

      So yeah. Comparing a TI OMAP processor to a PII is retarded. Good thing it was only an anonymous coward...

    14. Re:HDMI? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 0

      Supposedly, yes. It captures and plays 1080p video.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    15. Re:HDMI? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want HDMI on their phones? Are the phones really powerful enough to output an HD signal to TVs that people would want to watch?

      Powerful enough?
      Absolutely.
      Or to your computer monitor.
      It doesn't take a lot of power. Its just a digital signal down a wire.

      The question of merit is your first one: WHY.

      HDMI chips are incredibly cheap, usually built into the processor itself. They sort of fall out processor design as a freebe.
      Practical use is almost nil.

      You might find an occasional opportunity to shoot the video on the phone of the kids birthday party and play it back on the TV.
      But storing feature length film (or streaming them) from your phone to your TV set is seldom done by anyone. (Especially not over cellular networks
      where data caps make this impractical).

      In most households a laptop with a wifi connection is the easiest way to get a streaming movie from netflix (or what ever) to the big screen on the wall.
      The use case for doing this with a smart phone is simply nothing but a gimmick.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:HDMI? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like my Atrix, then the feature is mostly a gimick. Basically, connecting the HDMI cable launches a special media player. It will only play certain formats with a really bad interface.

    17. Re:HDMI? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them

      Still might fit in your pocket (or purse/backpack). Might make for nice bar chatter...
      "Say... Is that a Beowulf Cluster in your pants or are you just happy to see me?"

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    18. Re:HDMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love just having output cables for the iphone. if there was an HDMI out on it, it would be awesome. I don't think people realize that smart phones are now mini PCs. I can hook up my iphone to a friends tv and watch veetle or netflix through the tv off of 3G instead of taking the time/legal liability to crack a WEP or maybe there are no neighbors with wifi. yes, there is a reason for hdmi. I also am beginning to enjoy mobile gaming. RAGE on iphone... or I'm jailbroken so I have emulators. hook it up to the tv, pop out a couple of wiimotes and play Super Mario Bros. 1 on my NES emu.

    19. Re:HDMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The LG Optimus 2X does this... However, the appeal wore off after about 5 minutes. I'd rather have a more polished interface that doesn't make me want to crush the thing into the wall, better sound quality (it has more hiss than an old Candle cassette player) and longer battery life.

    20. Re:HDMI? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Except for the fact that in a lot of places, data over the phione is faster than broadband. Use your phone to connct to Netflix. Watch on your account at your friend's house.

      Or, using a bluetooth keyboard and mouse, use the phone for graphics design for your Make-A-Bot, or PCB layout.

      Next year is definitely NOT going to be the year of the desktop computer, Linux or otherwise.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    21. Re:HDMI? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      I can. Looks a lot like the 20 cars in front of me on the drive home.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    22. Re:HDMI? by icebike · · Score: 1

      But its just NOT done.

      And the data caps won't allow you to do that any time soon.

      All possible, yes. Maybe 10% of the buyers try it out once, but Nobody does it after that.
      Its just not done.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    23. Re:HDMI? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think my Streak is meant to do something similar, but I've never tried it as it requires purchasing a dock.

      I'm thinking that perhaps if you installed CyanogenMod or some other custom ROMs they will allow proper screen mirroring, though I haven't looked into it. Certainly it's not a hardware limitation anyway.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:HDMI? by g00ey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > It is a fairly respectable desktop machine even today

      I hope you do realize that you cannot compare it to a desktop computer just by looking at the specs. A desktop computer with the same performance as this phone would be pretty awful.

      As for the hard drives, the first multi-gigabyte hard drives came somewhere before the mid nineties but it took a few years before they reached the consumer market. I bought my first multi-gig hard drive 1997 and that particular model had been around for at least a year when I bought it. It wasn't cheap but it was fully existent.

    25. Re:HDMI? by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      "Say... Is that a Beowulf Cluster in your pants or are you just happy to see me?"

      "I don't know, but it's making me hot - in fact I think I'm on fire!"

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    26. Re:HDMI? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      And yes, technically phones are powerful enough to do that.

      Just keep in mind that HD can mean multiple types of resolutions, and that usually phones are at the lower end of what's considered HD. And my phone for instance, the Sprint Evo 4G, which is already dated, and which was the first phone with a micro-HDMI port, can output full HDMI resolutions (after I rooted it and installed a custom Android ROM on it). Now I believe, rooting the phone is no longer needed on most Android-micro-HDMI phones to get the full HDMI mirroring functionality, but you should still check that before you buy a phone, you never know.

      This means I can play games like JetCar on huge HD television screens. This means I can demo any Android app I want to recommend to my friends. And that when I need to go somewhere and make a powerpoint presentation, I don't need my laptop anymore, I just need to bring my phone and cable (assuming the room will have a modern-enough projector with an HDMI port on it).

      And technically, I could also watch HD Youtube and Hulu through it, which I believe is what you were asking about, after all I can get speeds of at least 1 MB per second with 4G, which is far better than my home DSL speed, but I really don't do that since I live a little bit out of the way, and I don't get good Sprint 4G signal inside my place (inside I usually just get good 3G).

    27. Re:HDMI? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And to follow that post ... ARM announces its next-gen GPU, the snappily named Mali-T658.

      The is the followup to the GPU that's used in the Galaxy S2, and is up to 10x the performance. The old chip supported 2 cores, this one supports 4, each core being twice the perf of the previous model, and as usual, can turn cores on or off depending on the power requirements.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15668347

      The firm claims the new technology will offer battery-powered mobile handsets roughly the same graphics performance as Sony's Playstation 3 console,

      but the bit I liked best: "At the moment many of the speech recognition applications that are out there are solely relying on the CPU," said Mr Davies. "Very few are taking advantage of the acceleration of the GPU - and that's clearly an area of growth for us."

    28. Re:HDMI? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      It is a fairly respectable desktop machine even today, except for the small disk drive.

      Even WITH all the extensive DSP functions added into these ARM chips, I'll still put an Intel / AMD processor up against a similarly clocked ARM chip absolutely any day. That leaves the phone you're describing perhaps faster than my laptop from close to a decade ago, but that's about it... I'd put my money on a P4 to run circles around it (assuming a decent video card). Phones only FEEL fast because the software is so aggressively optimized for performance on low-end hardware. Port Android to x86, and watch it fly on whatever old hardware you've got lying around. And that's today... The early PDAs felt pretty snappy with ~36MHz ARM chips for the basic apps on decent OSes like EPOC/Symbian, too.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    29. Re:HDMI? by Murdoc · · Score: 1
      I don't know about other people, but I use my HDMI port all the time. With 16 GB internal and a 32 GB sd card, I can carry entire seasons of tv shows and plenty of movies as well at normal resolutions and take them over to my friends' or family's place to watch on their TV. Even HD stuff I can carry enough to watch in one evening, and that not even getting into having more cards which are easy to carry. Much better than carting around DVD cases. My phone can also do Dolby 5.1 if the movie or show has that, so the port allows that as well. Plus it's useful for showing those beautiful HD movies I take with the camera on the phone on a nice big TV rather than just a computer monitor. And yes, high-res photos do look good on the TV as well. And all this on a poor little 680 MHz ARM 11, does just fine. So I find it much more useful than you are making it out to be. And I didn't have to buy the converter, it came with the phone.

      This is the Nokia N8 I'm talking about, in case you're interested.

      --
      Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know. - M. King Hubbert
    30. Re:HDMI? by thsths · · Score: 1

      Does it run PowerPoint? :-)

    31. Re:HDMI? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Back ins 2000, 1Gflop cost about $1000 in computing hardware. As we approach the year 2012, 1Gflop cost is nearing $1 of hardware (and huge savings in power usage). That is pretty amazing to me.

      Sorry, but I'm unimpressed. That "$1" device won't DO ANYTHING without a good $50 of other stuff wrapped around it, so measuring that "$1" piece is pretty pointless and arbitrary.

      The cost of a useful device is much more interesting. I'm very impressed I can get pretty good Android phone (Samsung Intercept) these days, with keyboard, for $99. http://www.virginmobileusa.com/cell-phones/samsung-intercept-phone.jsp

      That's much more impressive than a $25 Raspberry Pi, lacking all I/O. Hell, get it just for a wireless SSH & VNC client. It's a great price for a mini Android tablet, even if you never use it with the (cheap) cell service. It would be absolutely awesome if somebody ported (rootless) X11 to Android, and we could build-up a userland on such a device, and cross-compile and install all our familiar desktop apps seamlessly. Barring that, maybe someone would be interested in merging the needed changes into a stock Linux kernel to boot the device, then writing a working native X11 driver, giving us a tiny full-fledged linux box on the go.

      On that same note, x86 hardware is pretty dirt-cheap, too... An old Asus EEE-900 can be had for just $125 these days. A full-fledged, low-power, highly portable x86 computer, with a decent sized keyboard ready for touch-typing, just $125.

      That's the real baseline for comparison. That $1 gigaflop doesn't mean anything if I can't do anything with it for $1, and can't add 100 of them to my server for $100, or anywhere CLOSE to that.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:HDMI? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      I will say that I run a Motorola Atrix, and yes I have the laptop dock. Yes, mine is overclocked to 1.3Ghz rather than the stock 1.0Ghz, but I will say as a desktop machine it's pretty damned awesome. It runs the basics I need on a daily basis, and with some hacks in place I have terminal sessions and apt-get that I can use to install arbitrary software. I'm also running the "WebTop" environment from my SD card so I have more space.

      I can do about 90% of everything I ever need to do in that environment. I can SSH to servers, I can RDP to Windows boxes, I can fire up Firefox and/or Thunderbird for my basic Internet needs. Hell, I can even VPN if I need to when I'm remote. It adds a whole layer of flexibility that I love. Now, I can't play games on it except stuff like Solitaire, but I generally play games on XBox anyway. I also can't do much in the way of photo manipulation because yes it is a tad slower than I'm used to with my laptop.

      I personally don't think the WebTop environment is all that well optimized for the slow CPU... seems pretty much like an Ubuntu installation to me. I will say though that I am taking a trip to South Carolina at the end of the month and have no intention to take my full laptop with me. Instead I intend to take my Lapdock and my phone and call it good.

    33. Re:HDMI? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Don't really care enough to start mucking around.

    34. Re:HDMI? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's not really worth it. When they start putting in wireless HDMI or some such then it will be pretty cool though, Iron Man style.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    35. Re:HDMI? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I generally agree Android devices are great and can do a hell of a lot, but it's not anywhere close to 90% of the utility of a laptop. As someone else said, they're closer to thin clients, which is a great thing, no doubt, but even there they are only 90% of the way there... ConnectBot crashes quite a bit, and there's still no NX Client for Android. Cisco Anyconnect is available, but ONLY if you root your device.

      Many things I can get just BARELY functioning on my Android phone, but rather fragile and having lots of bugs and other dark corners to watch out for. Streaming video from an HTTP server in particular, I only turned up one player that worked, and it's frustratingly fragile and really all Android video players are stone-aged compared to MPlayer.

      Even things that supposedly work well... like YouTube, there are a large number of videos you can't play on their mobile app. All the control you have on a computer just isn't there on Android. What do you do when your Android is having difficulty connecting to aa WiFi AP? You pull out your laptop so you can actually debug the problem, rather than having a "user-friendly" Android black box you can't look into at all. The lack of eg. USB to RS-232 adapters for Android also keeps it from being able replace a standard system. I HATE Windows, but even in Windows I can do a hell of a lot of things I can't do on an Android device, and on Linux/BSD I can do vastly more. Just try simple stuff like printing a document directly from a smartphone... I can do it on my 15 year-old Psion 5 PDA, but not modern smart phones...

      Android is a great tool, but it's only 90% there for basic and thin-client functions. As a portable computer, it's got a long, long way to go. I think porting X11 would make it possible to make an Android device into a real computer, running real, first rate (not compromised "portable") applications. Until then, it's still just an accessory, still highly dependant on being tethered to real computers (ie. thin client).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    36. Re:HDMI? by F1re · · Score: 1

      I love my N8 too, and it comes with the hdmi cable included in the box!

      --
      ...there is no sig...
    37. Re:HDMI? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      If you didn't have a console, you could always plug that into your TV and watch Netflix.

    38. Re:HDMI? by Nyall · · Score: 1

      I was hoping that my first sentence that they are powerful enough encompassed video decoding. Oopsies.

      Hopefully netflix runs out the HDMI port. That would be another fun use-case. no ripping, encoding, and several hour long transfers to a micro SD card.

      Its cool that the n8 came with the adapter, but what I've seen is that most don't.

      Also, I'm pretty sure its not the poor little 680 MHz ARM 11 that is doing the video decoding.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    39. Re:HDMI? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      1GB of RAM was certainly not common on a 10 year old 800MHz Pentium III. I've got a couple of oldish laptops from that era and they came with 128 or 256 MB RAM as standard.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    40. Re:HDMI? by FranktehReaver · · Score: 1

      That is kind of stupid. So dropping from $1000 to $1 means nothing to you? You still factor in the $50 of other stuff around it? Well lets put this in a better wrapper for you... $1000 gigaflop processor with $1000 in the same hardware wrapper then which would now cost you $51... You Dunce.

  5. Reinvented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems a bit of an overstatement, how about slapped the Razr brand on a modern smartphone which isn't a clamshell.

    1. Re:Reinvented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many people who haven't moved to smartphones yet because they dislike having 'touchscreen only' phones. I'm historically a bit behind the curve on technology (I guess that means I'm getting old?), and when I picked up my first (HTC HD2, due to its adaptability), it was a bit of a begrudging change. There is something to be said about the tactility of having buttons you can press without looking at the device, and still having it input data accurately.

      I suspect they're going after the "want a physical keyboard on my smartphone" demographic. I know a couple people are clinging to their blackberries and slider phones (eg. TP2) for this very reason.

    2. Re:Reinvented? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Seems a bit of an overstatement, how about slapped the Razr brand on a modern smartphone which isn't a clamshell.

      Exactly. Kind of like handing someone a dishtowel and suddenly calling it a "Kleenex"...tends to promote a few "hey, what the hell?" responses...

    3. Re:Reinvented? by Kaetemi · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I want a dual touch-screen clamshell smartphone. Now. One that actually flips open in the right direction, too, you know, the direction so that you can actually use it to call, and so that people can actually hear what you're saying on the other side of the line.

      Also, to you smartphone users, I can't hear a thing you say when you call me. Please talk closer to your microphone next time, thank you.

      --
      Kaetemi
    4. Re:Reinvented? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      A single touchscreen clamshell would do fine for me though, the other half could be a keyboard which I'd only use sometimes, but would be enough.

      I think a double-screen clamshell would be quite expensive, especially if they wired the notification bar to a 3rd screen on the outside.

    5. Re:Reinvented? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1
      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  6. My Motorola Freezes by fsckmnky · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I have an el-cheapo motorola flip phone w/ camera, and if I leave it powered on for an extended period of time, it locks up. It locks up in the most annoying fashion however. It appears to be working, the display is still lit, the screen goes on/off when you open/close it, but it doesnt receive messages or phone calls, and then when you finally look to see if you have messages, it locks up. Annoying as hell.

    Sound quality is good when it works tho.

    Anyone else have stability issues to report ? Any wonderful praises of no problems whatsoever ?

    Seems to me that as the software gets more complex, the phone gets less reliable. (try hard to not accuse me of making a broad sweeping generalization)

    1. Re:My Motorola Freezes by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      I had a Moto SLVR that was kind of bitchy like that. I put up with it for about 6 months, until I found a good deal on an unlocked Sony-Ericsson K550i on eBay. That phone lasted me a year and a half, until I gave in and got an iPhone.

      "Appears to be working, but isn't" is about the worst way a phone can act up on you. I had that happen with multiple WinMo based HTC phones over the years. Definitely not fun when your job includes on-call duty. After the first time I got burned while on-call I had them direct that stuff to my personal cell and not my company-issued WinMo piece of shit.

    2. Re:My Motorola Freezes by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

      I have a Net10 pay-as-you-go LG el-cheapo flip phone that does something similar. Occasionally, it will lose sync with the cell network and no longer receive or send normal calls. The phone indicates "Emergency Use Only" if I try to make a call when this happens. The phone never actually locks up, though, and a power cycle fixes things. Kinda sucks, but I don't use the phone very much and it costs me $15/month to keep it (I buy Net10 300min/60day cards for $30). There is a visual indicator on this phone that lets me know when it has dropped signal. When things are working properly the word "Home" is displayed on the LCD, and it's not there when the phone has lost signal.

    3. Re:My Motorola Freezes by fsckmnky · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Mine is a tracfone ( same company as Net10 I believe ). Maybe its their crippleware patches and/or network setup ( I know they don't own their own towers, but they still have software / systems in the loop somewhere ).

    4. Re:My Motorola Freezes by fsckmnky · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Call me old fashioned and/or crazy, but a phone that doesn't receive calls or messages, is useless as a phone.

      Phone smarts versus Smart phones ... I prefer the former to the later.

    5. Re:My Motorola Freezes by fsckmnky · · Score: 1

      Modded down for being "100% offtopic" ? Do you work for motorola or something ? sheesh.

    6. Re:My Motorola Freezes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the shit does some antique piece of shit running a completely different software stack and hardware have to do with a new smartphone?

    7. Re:My Motorola Freezes by fsckmnky · · Score: 1

      Quality Control ... der

    8. Re:My Motorola Freezes by Kaetemi · · Score: 1

      My RAZR V3 randomly reboots itself.

      --
      Kaetemi
    9. Re:My Motorola Freezes by Politburo · · Score: 1

      It only speaks to QC on that one person's phone.. and even then it doesn't really say anything since you don't know if the error could have been caught by QC in the first place (e.g. caused by user dropping the phone).

  7. Re:Does anybody actually buy Motorola phones? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    ... because since Google bought them I would hope that they will consider these 'halo' phones for Android. I'm not sure about the quality of this one as it's pretty soon after the purchase, but I'm hoping they pump up the quality.

  8. Re:And battery life? by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

    That was probably a Sony device and actually supplemented the battery's power by consuming your life-force.

  9. In Other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nokia renames the Lumia as the 3310.
    Windows 8 is released as Windows Me2
    Firefox 9 is released as Firebird 1.0.

  10. RAZR used to be quite a nice phone by gshegosh · · Score: 1

    Now, there's nothing said about battery life when talking about phones. I've had a Motorola smartphone once, my laptop works longer on a charge.

    1. Re:RAZR used to be quite a nice phone by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I never understood the lure of the RAZR, I got one with an upgrade a few months after everyone started raving about them - it was the tackiest, cheapest phone I have ever had. The UI was shit, the features were shit, the battery life wasnt all that great. What was so spectacular about it?

      I sold it after a couple of weeks and stuck to my Samsung clamshell - best phone I ever had pre-smartphone.

    2. Re:RAZR used to be quite a nice phone by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      While you couldn't actually cut your throat with it, it made you want to! I took mine back in the 14 day cooling off period, and got a Nokia (E61, I think).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  11. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fairness, I've seen a lot of advertising for other companies recently using 11.11.11 as a key date; It's one of those those dates that's incredibly easy to remember, and that's what matters to marketing types. If you want to be mad at someone, it should be consumerist society.

  12. Most aren't all that hard to repair by dschnur · · Score: 1

    For the most part, replacing glass, lcd panels or case parts isn't hard in most smart phones. There are many video walk-troughs on Youtube for almost any model. Parts are available on eBay and several web sites for nearly all smart phones and tablets.

    I've fixed *many* broken smart phones for my wife, friends, and "the person at the office next door who heard I can do it."

    If you have steady hands and can follow instructions, basic smart phone repair is pretty simple.

    When iFixit says "might be hard to repair," they probably mean it.

  13. is the razr fast enouh? by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

    I remember the original razrs- they were super slow. Slow with texting, slow with menus, slow with everything. Hopefully these new ones will not live up to that legacy.

    1. Re:is the razr fast enouh? by thsths · · Score: 1

      What do you expect? Motorola has always delivered terrible software. Even a Motorola phone I had way back in the days (2 line gray dot character display) was troublesome to use because of all the software bugs.

      Anybody who things that this one is different has not learned anything from the past.

  14. Re:Does anybody actually buy Motorola phones? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

    Has the purchase even closed yet? From the press release:

    The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2011 or early 2012.

    It might be a little early for the Google purchase to have any impact on the phones. Hopefully someday, though.

  15. Is it too much to ask... by Millennium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on. Can't even one smartphone maker do a decent clamshell design? I've found the slide mechanism on slide-outs way too vulnerable to breakdowns, and the bar phones are even worse. When did the idea of a reliable case design that protects the important stuff go out of fashion?

    1. Re:Is it too much to ask... by mustPushCart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When apple stopped doing it.

    2. Re:Is it too much to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      when corning said, hey, check out this new glass we made.

    3. Re:Is it too much to ask... by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Today's giant scree designs make clamshell a bit difficult. You could have the hinge on the other side, but that makes vertical operation awkward. You could keep the traditional clamshell orientation, but then it becomes a very long, weird device... unless you make the screen smaller, which just isn't what makes a desirable smartphone for the vast majority of people.

      They do make cases for people such as yourself, though: http://www.oriongadgets.com/Apple-iPhone-3GS-Leather-Flip-Type-Case-Crocodile-Pattern-Red-pid-5305.html

    4. Re:Is it too much to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are Android clamshell phones, for instance the SCH-W999 from Samsung or the Aquos Hybrid 007SH from Sharp (same link).

    5. Re:Is it too much to ask... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not fair. When RIM put out the Pearl Flip, that's when everyone realized it wasn't cool anymore.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:Is it too much to ask... by Kaetemi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      Kaetemi
    7. Re:Is it too much to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are probably right. I would only add that the 71.mm thickness goes well with the RAZR name, and is an appealing thing to say about the product which would be difficult to achieve with a different form factor. Just to compare, a blackberry torch is 14.6mm thick, a Galaxy II is 8.5mm, an iPhone4s is 9.3mm, SE Experia is 8.7mm, the nokia 800 is 91mm...yeah, this RAZR is really thin!

    8. Re:Is it too much to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dual screens. Ask Nintendo about it.

    9. Re:Is it too much to ask... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      unless you make the screen smaller, which just isn't what makes a desirable smartphone for the vast majority of people.

      I doubt most people pick a phone based on screen size.

    10. Re:Is it too much to ask... by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

      Really? Size and resolution were at the top of my list, and friends (techie and non-techie alike) seemed to think it important for their decisions, also.

    11. Re:Is it too much to ask... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      When did the idea of a reliable case design that protects the important stuff go out of fashion?

      The exact SECOND that GORILLA GLASS and capacitative touch-screens came along... eliminating the need to make horrible design decisions around protecting an incredibly fragile screen.

      When I'm doing some light reading on my droid, I don't want it to be twice as wide, with part of it (the keyboard) flapping around, when I don't need it.

      Conversely, I wouldn't buy a smartphone without a keyboard, and a slider works pretty well, not requiring me to do any contortions to hold both pieces of the phone, or worrying about it collapsing.

      I'd love it if somebody came out with a slider which had a hinge which could optionally be used to convert it to a laptop form factor (eliminating the need for a kickstand as well), but not making standard hand-held slide-out mode any more difficult. Keyboards would need to get just a bit bigger, and keys a bit less resistive, and most people could actually touch-type on them. Long live the Psion 5MX.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Is it too much to ask... by MobyTurbo · · Score: 1

      Can't even one smartphone maker do a decent clamshell design?

      Sprint (and Boost Mobile) got RIM to make one for them recently, the Blackberry Style, but the gadget blogs were too busy laughing at the fact that it was a clamshell to notice it was one of RIM's better phones. (As opposed to the Pearl Flip, which like all Pearls, was a piece of garbage.) It's end-of-lifed at Sprint already, though Boost Mobile, a prepaid subsidiary, still has some in stock.

    13. Re:Is it too much to ask... by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Sharp Aquos 007SH is a 16MP android with a rotating 3D flip screen... and it's waterproof. It's been out since June.

  16. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by mariasama16 · · Score: 1

    On top of that, if you bought the phone yesterday, it was $111.11. Today? Its $300.

  17. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by jpapon · · Score: 1

    Well, you have to admit, 11.11.11 is a pretty awesome date. We won't see another like it in our lifetimes.

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
  18. Huge Screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why is it that most of the high-end smart phones come with these huge screens? For me the size of an Iphone is much better suited, and I might be willing to go a tad larger, but with the new Nexus at 4.6x", how am I supposed to put it anywhere?

    1. Re:Huge Screens by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Because it's too hard to read those tiny screens, especially when you're sufing or trying to read a book. Even navigation works better with larger screens.

      Most of the "smart phone" features require more screen space to be effective.

    2. Re:Huge Screens by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Why is it that most of the high-end smart phones come with these huge screens? For me the size of an Iphone is much better suited, and I might be willing to go a tad larger, but with the new Nexus at 4.6x", how am I supposed to put it anywhere?

      Er, "put" it anywhere? The designers and vendors don't imagine such a device ever leaving your hand, which is why they try and cram as much entertainment value (dual cameras, HD recording and playback, streaming video, etc, etc.) into a device that USED to just make phone calls.

      Thus, if it fits in your hand, what seems to be the problem...

  19. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    12.12.12?

  20. More informative yesterday by slaad · · Score: 2

    This probably would have been more informative yesterday when amazon was selling them for $111.11.

    --


    ~Warning!~ The above is encrypted using rot676!
    1. Re:More informative yesterday by unixisc · · Score: 1

      With a 2 year plan, you should be able to get them for $11.11

  21. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    That's only 50% as good

  22. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

    11/11/1918 was Armistice Day, and it occurred at 11:00. "Eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month" and all that. But I'm not sure why that makes this objectionable. It's celebrating the end of the war if it's celebrating anything, which--last I knew--was a good thing.

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  23. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, it's kinda like it. Not quite as cool because 11.11.11 is all ones. I can't wait for 13.13.13.

  24. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In many countries Armistice Day is not a celebration of the end of the war but a sombre remembrance of the those who died fighting for their country,

  25. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    I'm not excited about that one. Lousy Smarch weather.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  26. Re:And battery life? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

    Oh come on, let's be realistic here, the amount of lifeforce that Sony devices sucks is minimal. I use my PSP, three walkmen and a sony TV everyday just to keep my nails from growing.

    You're blowing this way out of proportion.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  27. Re:Does anybody actually buy Motorola phones? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I actually loved my RAZR - kept it as long as I had it. Never liked the ones from LG or Nokia. I'm glad that Mot is bringing it back, although I'm somewhat missing the flip phone aspect to it. I do hope it's capable of supporting the 64GB microSD card that was announced a while ago, and also, that it supports camera & video. Am glad they're making it 4G. So will this phone be Mot branded or Google?

  28. Re:And battery life? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    My last RAZR lasted ~ 2 days w/o recharging. Since it was the first generation, the camera resolution was bad, and it had no microSD slots, but other than that, it was good.

  29. Re:Does anybody actually buy Motorola phones? by phaserbanks · · Score: 1

    Wondering this too. If I'm gonna spend this much, I want an Ice Cream Sandwich phone, not something made to run last year's software.

  30. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    2012-12-12 is not binary-compliant.

  31. It's.. It's.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    That's a Motorolla Photon with a keyboard!

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  32. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there's always 12.12.12 in about 13 months.

  33. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by migla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remembrance(TM) of your departed loved ones, brought to you by Mc Donalds. Coca-Cola with the United Fruit, Inc. presents Peace(TM) and Happiness(TM). Have a nice(TM) day, in association with Nike.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  34. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, since calendar dates are completely arbitrary, all we have to do to see another like it in our lifetimes is use a different calendar. Big deal.

  35. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, 'cuz we'll all be dead by 12.12.12

  36. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's it exactly. Thank you.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  37. Hey. Guys. It's a flat Android phone. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Big fat hairy deal. Sorry, but other than the iconic Razr this phone looks pretty standard fare.

    I actually like the original Razr. It was a super-flat fold phone with a sturdy metal body and a awesome keypad. And am quite sure it would still have a market if they'd continue to produce it. There are quite a few cellphone classics out there that probably would never die out and allways have customers. Motorolas Razr and the Siemens M35 being two of those.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Hey. Guys. It's a flat Android phone. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I agree on the second part, disagree on the first part.

      Thin devices are awesome. sucks to grip them but i love the engineering that goes into making something that tiny.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Hey. Guys. It's a flat Android phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may change the labels from "Razr", but Motorola still produces what you're talking about for the pre-paid market. Sure, they may use cheaper materials on the outside, but when talking about overall characteristics and what they put on the inside there is not much difference. What would have been a nice Razr about a decade ago is now some W-series phone with a TracPhone or T-Mobile label stuck on.

      No longer regarded as the thing to have, but they certainly do the job. Motorola still has a role in that market.

    3. Re:Hey. Guys. It's a flat Android phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's very thin, has a great screen, and is really fast. So why complain?

    4. Re:Hey. Guys. It's a flat Android phone. by vaporland · · Score: 1

      I liked the digital Motorola StarTac. Good sound quality, great battery life, small size. I think that was the epitome of simple cellphone design.

      The only existing GSM StarTac models don't work on US GSM standards, or I would buy one and use it on AT&T.

      Of course, the Motorola MicroTac was the only one that could do this...

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    5. Re:Hey. Guys. It's a flat Android phone. by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Oh, the M35! That thing kicked so much ass. I bought a lot of 10 of them as-is on ebay a few years ago, hoping I could patch together a working phone - no such luck :(

  38. In name only by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its not the same phone, just yet another android phone. Yet another marketing gimmick.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:In name only by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Agree. If anything, it's closer to the SLVR.

  39. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for yourself, I plan to be alive on 12.12.12 :)

  40. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you have to admit, 11.11.11 is a pretty awesome date. We won't see another like it in our lifetimes.

    Too bad we didn't. It's actually 11-11-2011. We missed 11-11-11 by 2,000 years!

  41. not TI OMAP by yupa · · Score: 1

    Looking at the teardown show us a ST Ericsson CPCAP 6556002, not a TI OMAP...

  42. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    either is 2011-11-11

  43. Re:Does anybody actually buy Motorola phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oddly enough, i've kept everything as long as i've had it. curious coincidence?

  44. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Not quite, he forgot the appropriate Hallmark(TM) card.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  45. Re:12-12-12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we all dying on December 11th, 2012?

  46. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12.12.12 isn't too far away

  47. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12/12/12?

  48. No removable battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    =FAIL

  49. i'll never buy another motorola phone by jaydonnell · · Score: 0

    I bought a droid X2 not too long ago and it's been a terrible experience. The phone is very sluggish despite having a dual core processor. Starting the camera takes so long that I often don't even try cause it's faster to ask my wife for her iphone and use it. It's also taken them a long time to push out Android updates and I have no idea if they'll ever push out ice cream sandwich for it. This last bit isn't motorola's fault, but the UI is terrible on android.

  50. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12.12.12

    Oh, yeah, the world ends in 2012. My bad.

  51. Live fast, die young by Paul1969 · · Score: 1

    According to a hands-on review I read, running the new "RAZR" on an LTE network gives you about 2 and a half hours of battery life.
    Enjoy.

  52. Re:Does anybody actually buy Motorola phones? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I ultimately gave that RAZR away to my neice, who was in need of a phone.

  53. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Maybe not, but we get a shot at 12-12-12 next year ....

  54. Only good feature - clamshell design - is lost by clive_p · · Score: 1

    The only reason I have a current Motorola phone is because it's GSM 4-band (which one needs to use it in North America and the rest of the world), and because it has a clamshell design, which means the buttons don't get pressed by accident when it's in my pocket or a briefcase. Losing the latter, is crazy, as it was the only really good feature, and one which you can't get from otherwise decent phone manufacturers like Nokia. I won't buy a smartphone until they come out with one having a design which protects the display and the buttons when it's in my pocket along with keys, loose change, pocket knife, and whatever.

  55. um, ok... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...the new RAZR is nothing like the V3[x]. I liked the V3. I still have two: the V3i and the V3r.

    Now all I need is a firmware update so I can use a 3G SIM in them...

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  56. old news by mapkinase · · Score: 1
    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  57. freezes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I need to carry a Torx driver and a Ginsu knife with me for when this phone freezes up and needs a battery pop to reset it?

    1. Re:freezes? by Lime+Green+Bowler · · Score: 1

      I'd +1 you if I could-- this is a very important point. I'm on my 4th generation of Android-powered phones, currently a Droid 3. All have had their "moments" at some time or another and have needed to have the battery pulled for a cold boot.

  58. Seeing is not believing by frisket · · Score: 1

    The RAZR was a hot phone

    Perhaps, but most Motorola phones suck little black toads. Unreliable, restrictive, and unimaginative are the three words which first come to mind. Not unimaginative in visual design — the RAZR was certainly groundbreaking that way — but in function. They may have a lot of patents, but as I have posted before, Google are on a hiding to nothing if they think they're going to benefit from them.

    [...] the display on the DROID RAZR [...] still isn’t perfect

    That's going to kill it: it's one of the first things people look at. If it looks grainy compared with other phones, it's a loser.

    can’t even delete an icon off the home screen using one hand

    If it's only usable by people with large hands, that's a bit restrictive. It also demonstrates that there was insufficient user testing done.

    [...] the device instantly reacting to every touch event, swipe and drag

    I find this hard to believe except on a brand new machine with no apps. All Android devices suffer from an exceptionally poor design philosophy, that what is going on under the hood is more important than the user's input. So once you have loaded up your apps and configured your connectivity (polling frequencies, downloads, etc), the responsivity of the interface takes a nosedive, with the system believing that its internal housekeeping must run at a higher priority than the interface. Wrong: a usable system (of any kind, not just smartphones) must absolutely respond instantaneously to user input before resuming whatever internal processes are active. No matter how fast the processor, if the OS is going to prioritise its background tasks higher than the interface, it's a loser. System designers don't understand this: they believe the user must always wait.

    Is it a device worthy of being the new Motorola RAZR?

    Possibly, but to me it looks like it was designed exclusively for the US, with its restrictive, antiquated cellphone companies, and its core of unfortunate and unenlightened users who have only just migrated off phones with pull-out aerials. In a country where vendors can get away with almost any old rubbish, including hopelessly outdated OS versions, ridiculous charging models (pay to receive, FFS?), and patchy coverage, it might just succeed.

  59. Thick or Thin? by thsths · · Score: 1

    It may be 7.1mm thin, but it is also 11.1mm thick. It depends on where you measure. And dimensions are usually given at the widest point - otherwise they are absolutely arbitrary.

    So I would boycott it just for lying to the customer. And because I am perfectly happy with a budget android phone running CM7.1 (based on Android 2.3.7, not 2.3.5, ha!).

  60. It's only 7.1 mm thin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only 7.1 mm thin if you don't measure the thick part!

  61. Bad article title, nothing new to see here by Lime+Green+Bowler · · Score: 1

    Bad title for this article. It should be "Motorola develops a thinner Android phone". The RAZR brand name is irrelevant today. I had a RAZR and it was nothing out of the ordinary. So I immediately thought: wow, Moty is throwing out a new budget phone, a rehack of a RAZR..

    What I'm still not impressed with: this is still a tall/wide Android. Somebody needs to come out with a more compact one- that is also thin. That would impress me. Having a wide-tall bulky paddle-sized Android phone on my belt that gets caught on seatbelts is no longer 'cool'. It's dorky as shit, and so are all of the lame "ladies" pocket-book sized cases for these things.

  62. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, we will. 12/12/12.

  63. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except next year on Dec 12, 2012. (12.12.12). Then we will be done seeing these in out lifetimes. Unless Nano Tech allows us to live for centuries.

  64. Re:BGR??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes you want to BGR a ROKR named RIZR with a SLVR RAZR. when hit him with a PEBL!

    You might be a bit ANSI but ASCII and you shall receive!

  65. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is 12.12.12 within your lifetime?

  66. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What fucking morons marked this as insightful? First and foremost, Veterans Day is not Memorial Day. Secondly, I have never seen any one of those companies do anything to commercialize either Veterans Day or Memorial Day. That honor is usually taken by Japanese and European car companies.

  67. No gyro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This phone does not have a gyroscope!
    All recent high end phones do have a gyro, which helps applications get better spatial coordinates.
    I don't understand Motorola's decision on this one.
    For me, that alone is a deal-breaker.

  68. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Why is this so objectionable? I don't get it.

    Please kill yourself.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  69. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by FranktehReaver · · Score: 1

    I hope it falls on a friday... Let me see if it will

  70. They'll have to go much thinner - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because once you put a protective case on it, it's the size of any regular-size smartphone.

  71. reapirs? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    You and your 20th century terminology!

  72. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12/12/12 12:12:12

    I hope you last more than 1.2 year. ;)

  73. Re:Went on sale Nov. 11th at 11:11? Really? by migla · · Score: 1

    It was in reply the question what's wrong with remembering this date by means of some company having similar date/time in their marketing.

    The comment was meant as a general comment on commercial interests co-opting human culture/history in their marketing.

    Through means of humor and being kind of dystopian or perhaps hyperbolic or something, I was trying to convey that I think such behavior is tacky. While all the above mentioned corporations probably are doing their best to co-opt some appreciated part of culture/history, I don't think any of them have been as blatant as claiming to sponsor/bring Peace.

    The companies named were chosen for their status as big, well known brands that do a lot of marketing and that also have been known to engage in unethical practices here and there. Poster-boys for classic big bad corporations, so to speak. Should perhaps have thrown Shell in there too.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.