Slashdot Mirror


Skilled Readers Recognize Words By Shape

hessian writes "Skilled readers can recognize words at lightning fast speed when they read because the word has been placed in a visual dictionary of sorts, say Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC) neuroscientists. The visual dictionary idea rebuts the theory that our brain 'sounds out' words each time we see them."

30 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. first pnst!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pop quiz! who read it correctly? who read it "first post"?

  2. Yes by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always suspected that I read like that. I only have to spell words I don't know, or chop them up into syllables.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Yes by steelfood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also explains why we can just as easily read mispelt words where only some of the letters have been switched around. It's not which letters that get switched, but the resulting shape, that determines whether the word is easily readable or not.

      It's also why certain words are constantly spelt incorrectly or mistaken for one another. Not only are the sounds of the variations similar, and sometimes the meaning, but so are the shapes. E.g., you don't see people mistake "they're" for "their", but you see people mistake "there" for "their" and vice versa all the time. Or for that matter, "then" and "than", "effect" and "affect". And at least for myself, the first few times I saw the word "prefect" in Harry Potter, I thought it said "perfect" and kept wondering why they were so arrogant.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Yes by tsa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And another thing: English is not my native language and I know a lot of English words I have never heard. Yet I can read them no problem. Another fact in favor of the theory in the article.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Yes by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      And at least for myself, the first few times I saw the word "prefect" in Harry Potter, I thought it said "perfect" and kept wondering why they were so arrogant.

      In ye olden days of 5 digit /. UIDs, that was "Ford Prefect" from HHGTTG.

      This also begs the question, of like, um, why completely inappropriately used phrases drive some people bonkers and others don't care. My visual cortex knows that "begs the question" is almost certainly meaningless filler and its application 99.9% of the time has no relation to its actual meaning, so I do not process/see it. Ditto uh, um, like. Perhaps like people in the under 30 crowd process spoken language like in a similar way, explaining why they like have this absolutely desperate like need to fill all pauses with the word "like" whenever they speak, like especially in like public.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Yes by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy Proof
      Which is harder to read:

      This first sentence which is typed correctly and is correctly formatted...

      oR thIS SeConD seNTeNcE wHiCh yOU PrObaBLy doNT reCOgNiZe thE ShaPe oF?

      Thanks to annoying people on facebook, I'm sure we all already knew this.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    5. Re:Yes by idontgno · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that was "Ford Prefect" from HHGTTG.

      Well, to be fair, if you knew what a Ford Prefect actually was, you'd never confuse it with "perfect." XD

      As to the use (misuse?) of "stock phrases" like "beg the question", I assume that some people use those phrases idiomatically (i.e., no literal meaning intended) because they heard someone else they thought worthy of emulating doing so. Because of this, they don't consider if the literal phrase makes sense ("How do I do... what?").

      In the specific (and hilariously controversial*) case of "beg the question", it's possible to torture a nearly-sensible literal meaning out of the phrase ("This begs the question" == "This begs someone to ask the question"), so the correct use derived from the original Latin phrase (and only sensible in light of Latin's vocabulary and grammar) will die out within a couple of generations, except in philosophical specialist material.

      *Case in point

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:Yes by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      In ye olden days of 5 digit /. UIDs, that was "Ford Prefect" from HHGTTG.

      And in ye olden dayes of 4 digit /. UIDs, it was the captain of your local Praetorian guard unit.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    7. Re:Yes by Myria · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And another thing: English is not my native language and I know a lot of English words I have never heard. Yet I can read them no problem. Another fact in favor of the theory in the article.

      I am a native speaker and I've learned many words in writing before I learned them in speech. As a result, some of my pronunciations are nonstandard. I pronounce "comparable" as if it were "compare" + "able", even though the standard way is irregular, "comp" + "arable". I tried to pronounce these words from how they were written before I'd heard them.

      --
      "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    8. Re:Yes by airfoobar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not a very good proof, I don't think. By reading the first and last couple of characters of each word and measuring their relative lengths, I seem to read that without any trouble at all. A better test would be to remove the whitespace:

      oRthISSeConDseNTeNcEwHiChyOUPrObaBLydoNTreCOgNiZethEShaPeoF?

      Or even to insert wrong spacing:
      oRth ISSe ConDseNTeNc Ew HiChy OUP rObaBL ydoNTreCO gNiZe thEShaP eoF?

    9. Re:Yes by arcsimm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am ashamed of how quickly I read that.

    10. Re:Yes by misosoup7 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And another thing: English is not my native language and I know a lot of English words I have never heard. Yet I can read them no problem. Another fact in favor of the theory in the article.

      I am a native speaker and I've learned many words in writing before I learned them in speech. As a result, some of my pronunciations are nonstandard. I pronounce "comparable" as if it were "compare" + "able", even though the standard way is irregular, "comp" + "arable". I tried to pronounce these words from how they were written before I'd heard them.

      I don't know why this is even up for debate. If you look at any ideogram languages, you can't just sound out each word. Especially Chinese, where there are character that sound the same but have different characters. Or even the same character can be read differently depending on context. You definitely memorized the shape. The article is definitely right that we must be storing a visual dictionary of sorts. If we had to sound out each word, then ideogram languages would have never been invented, too inefficient.

      But this also doesn't mean that you don't also associate shapes to sounds. The reason you pronounce it like "compare" + "able" is because you associated the shape "compare" to its sound and "able" to its sound. When put together, it would come out as "compare" + "able". This doesn't prove that you sound out the words as you see them. However, English is a language that runs on syllables, and "compare" is a multiple syllable word, so it gets broken up in the official pronunciation of the word comparable.

  3. Interesting... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting- I read about two or three times as fast as my wife and we've talked abou this before.
    (frustrating when trying to read an e-mail together on the same PC at the same time).

    She does sound out words in her head- I don't- I just tend to zip over them. There again- speed has its consequences- she tends to remember what she read better than I do.

    I'll be reading a book and then realise I've been on auto-pilot for the last 3 pages and actually have no recollection of what I just read.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Interesting... by pairo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll be reading a book and then realise I've been on auto-pilot for the last 3 pages and actually have no recollection of what I just read.

      That happens to me too, but what makes it especially annoying is that when I re-read, I recognize it and slowly start remembering what I read.

    2. Re:Interesting... by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll be reading a book and then realise I've been on auto-pilot for the last 3 pages and actually have no recollection of what I just read.

      That happens to me too, but what makes it especially annoying is that when I re-read, I recognize it and slowly start remembering what I read.

      This happens all the time when my wife is talking at me, the buffer space fills up and lag starts hitting, especially if what I'm hearing is boring or repetitive or uninteresting "Why are you wasting all that time on /. blah blah and the garbage needs to be taken out and blah blah blah" and two minutes later I notice she mentioned taking the trash out so I stand up to do it, and she knows why there was a two minute tape delay and she gets more annoyed. Oh well.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Interesting... by MachDelta · · Score: 5, Funny

      One thing my girlfriend does that annoys the absolute piss out of me is ask me questions when i'm deep in thought writing an essay or coding. I swear this is my brain at those moments:

      Active process: writeProgram("Project.cpp")
      HARDWARE INTERRUPT: "Honey do you think I should curl my hair or straighten it for tomorrow?"
      caching audio file...
      Abort module(writeProgram);
      exiting to OS...
      exiting...
      loading Awareness.bat
      paging filesystem
      loading recognition:speech(5849932 bytes)
      loading calendar->tomorrow (4355 bytes)
      loading, hair (34382 bytes)
      loading, woman (0? bytes)
      accessing speech drivers
      Speak: "Ah..bu..wha..."
      IRQ conflict detected!
      resolving conflict
      emptying audio cache
      reloading speech driver...
      Ready.
      WARNING: audio recording length: 0 bytes
      Speak: "Um... yes?" ...
      "Why do you never listen to what I say!??"

    4. Re:Interesting... by 6Yankee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Colleague came into my office the other day, just as I was disappearing up the arses of two databases at once (one Postgres, one SQL Server). She asked me if I wanted to go for coffee. Apparently, it took well over a minute to get anything approaching a coherent answer, and the answer was "You'd better go. If you wait until I can answer that question your break will be over." I barely even remember it, other than the unpleasant sensation of trying to drag myself out of there one layer of mess at a time. First time that's ever happened, hope it's the last.

  4. This is news? by Lispy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting. I was under the impression that this is common sense. Maybe I should have spoken it out aloud in order to get all the praise. ;) Pretty interesting still to know that this is scientifically proven now. I wonder if this could be used for learning another language.

  5. Seklild Rderaes by erilane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?

    1. Re:Seklild Rderaes by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except that the human mind can read it faster and more reliably when the letters are in the correct order. (And simply correct.)

      Lazy and barely-literate types will mewl "o u new wut i ment", and it's true that a reasonably intelligent person can figure it out, but communication is easier and less stressful when everyone uses standard spelling. The fact that an experienced reader can go beyond deciphering individual phonemes and recognize the patterns is one part of that.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  6. 2nd Grade by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Funny

    My daughter come home from 2nd Grade every week with a list of 'sight-words' to focus on - that is, words that were intended to be immediately recognized, not sounded out.

    Glad modern science has caught up with elementary school.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:2nd Grade by inviolet · · Score: 4, Informative

      My daughter come home from 2nd Grade every week with a list of 'sight-words' to focus on - that is, words that were intended to be immediately recognized, not sounded out.

      Glad modern science has caught up with elementary school.

      That teaching method was originally introduced in the 1960s as "Look Say". It was part of the general ideological overhaul of public education, of which the "New Math" was also a part. It all sprang from Russel et. al.'s philosophy of Behaviorism, which pointed away from man-the-rational and towards man-the-animal. Hence reading by memorization rather than by rational system (phonics).

      Since then it has been discredited and so it had to change its name, I think it's called "Whole Language" now. It still competes with Phonics. This new research suggests the reason why Look Say is not the total failure that I and others predicted. However, it has a bit of difficulty explaining why (as others in this thread have pointed out) we can so easily read words whose internal letters are jumbled, so long as the first and last letters are correct.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  7. We do both by AlienSexist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes it is a visual dictionary and if it is a cache-miss, then the fallback behavior is to re-parse the word slowly and sound it out. After a few encounters with a strange word it becomes visually cached as well. Parsing a word is far slower, of course, and is not the default behavior.

    1. Re:We do both by Broolucks · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I actually often skip even the fallback behavior. This happens especially often when I read novels that take place in foreign locations and the characters have names that I am not accustomed to reading. I read the book from cover to cover and then realize I have not the slightest clue what the main character is named. I recognize the overall shape of the name and the letter it starts with, but the rest is a jumbled mental mess, because I never took the time to read it and sound it out. For instance, while reading Crime and Punishment, to me, the main character's name was always R***********kov, and it would have been R********** if not for the character named R***********khin I had to tell him apart from.

      Visual caching does not require re-parsing and sounding the word. You can just cache an unparsed blob. In general, I only bother parsing and sounding out a word if I expect to hear it, say it or write it later on. For this reason, when I read a name, a neologism or an unknown word that I can guess from the context, I rarely ever bother parsing it. Maybe it's just me, though.

  8. Stupid Article is Stupid by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's already been well established that at least many people read this way.

    Its common knowledge that most people can read normal (lower) case text faster than upper case text. And it has long been surmised that its due to the much better word shape diversity of lower case.

    Its also common knowledge that most people can read jumbled up words with very little difficulty, as long as the first and last letters are correct, and the rest of the letters are in there in a random order.

    Such as:

    "I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae."

    Given the number of people who can read the above almost effortlessly, anyone clinging to the theory that fast readers are "sounding words out" needs to be clubbed over the head with a baseball bat.

    It also rebuts the premise of the article that we read by word shape. Its clearly a bit more complicated than that.

    I expect we simultaneously look at word shape, the leading and closing letters, the length, and the middle letters along with some "predictive" matching based on context cues so we can narrow down likely candidate words that "fit" the sentence.

    1. Re:Stupid Article is Stupid by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's important is that this is finally becoming established fact. Hooked on Phonics (and its sibling programs used the nation over for the past 20 years) produced a load of kids (in my generation specifically) who could barely read aloud at half their speaking pace. Phonics is an important skill for anyone who is literate but we have dedicated hundreds of hours of education time to it when at least some of that time should have been going to sight based reading. It isn't the difference between fast and slow readers, it's the difference between being able to read, and being able to read and comprehend while you do so.

      Incidentally, your scrambled words example is a great way to show that word shape is very important, more important than just "the first and last letters". Look at the believe. Scrambled as it is in your example the word shape is identical (bvleiee) but if you scramble it in a way that moves the tall 'l' around it's much harder to read (beivele). The text that went around the internet that you are quoting from is very carefully constructed to be as easy to read as possible. actually becomes aulaclty, according becomes aocdcrnig. There are other tricks used also, making sure that the trickier to decode words have lots of context, preserving multi-letter characters, preserving important syllables, etc. It's a neat piece of brain hacking, but it isn't quite what it's made out to be.
                           

  9. Road signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    When the British decided to implement their current system of road direction signs, they switched from all-caps to mixed-case precisely for this reason: people remember the general shapes of words and the positioning of ascenders and descenders, thus people found it far easier to distinguish, say, "Brighton" than "BRIGHTON". This was many decades ago - how is this news?

  10. This is anything but a new theory. by coldfarnorth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft, of all places, has a pretty good webpage on this.

    Check out the "Model 1: Word Shape" section, in which this theory is described as "oldest model in the psychological literature, and is likely much older than the psychological literature"

    There's some other interesting sections there too, like the moving window study.

    --
    Lets start refering to The War Against Terror by it's initials. . .
  11. The funny thing is by Quila · · Score: 4, Funny

    As I read, I read to myself in my head, not sounding out letters, but the words as I go. Whenever I see this example of transposition, that voice in my head starts to sound like it has Down syndrome.

  12. I don't by MagicM · · Score: 5, Funny

    read subjects.