Slashdot Mirror


Internet Water Army On the March

New submitter kermidge sends in an article at the Physics arXiv blog about what's called the "Internet Water Army," large groups of people in China who are paid to "flood" internet sites with comments and reviews about various products. Researchers at the University of Victoria went undercover to figure out exactly how these informational (or disinformational) floods operate, and what they learned (PDF) could lead to better spam-detection software. Quoting: "They discovered that paid posters tend to post more new comments than replies to other comments. They also post more often with 50 per cent of them posting every 2.5 minutes on average. They also move on from a discussion more quickly than legitimate users, discarding their IDs and never using them again. What's more, the content they post is measurably different. These workers are paid by the volume and so often take shortcuts, cutting and pasting the same content many times. This would normally invalidate their posts but only if it is spotted by the quality control team. So Cheng and co built some software to look for repetitions and similarities in messages as well as the other behaviors they'd identified. They then tested it on the dataset they'd downloaded from Sina and Sohu and found it to be remarkably good, with an accuracy of 88 per cent in spotting paid posters."

137 comments

  1. Raise your hand if... by Compaqt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your first thought was cyber-payback for "EU says water isn't wet."

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Raise your hand if... by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      My immediate thought was "Buy our tasty Internet Water!*"

      *(warning, may contain troll faeces)

    2. Re:Raise your hand if... by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, my first thought was internet over water pipes, since they have already tried internet over power lines, and other 'utilities (phone companies, cabletv companies) bundle internet with their services (if you get your internet, phone and cable from us you only pay $25/mo for each...

    3. Re:Raise your hand if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in Communist China, the Internet is not a series of tubes, rather it is a line a people passing bit buckets. Easier to filter I guess.

    4. Re:Raise your hand if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought was that this was about the SCADA water system hack and that it was going to escalate.

    5. Re:Raise your hand if... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      That explains all the pro-iphone/ipad stuff.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    6. Re:Raise your hand if... by gv250 · · Score: 1

      No, my first thought was internet over water pipes ...

      Been there, done that.

    7. Re:Raise your hand if... by iiiears · · Score: 1

      Handy when your talking war with Syria or Accidents in Iran..

      --
      15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
  2. I'm part of the 50% by mugetsu37 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was paid to leave this new comment.

    1. Re:I'm part of the 50% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, stop being a stereotype. First post and you are completely supporting the idea that a uid > 1million means offtopic or crap comments. Maybe check out reddit. A comment like this would bank you massive karma.

    2. Re:I'm part of the 50% by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, now the internet is being Aquaturfed, not just astroturfed....

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  3. Feedback loop... by nomel · · Score: 4, Funny

    And, the moment this detection software is for sale, it will be inserted into the paid posters submission workflow.

    1. Re:Feedback loop... by hardtofindanick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a.k.a. game theory

    2. Re:Feedback loop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but to counter this method you need to be more unique i.e. put more time into each post, it is an economic weapon increasing the cost of abuse significantly and therefore reducing post quantity and number of sites economically target-able.

    3. Re:Feedback loop... by tqft · · Score: 2

      or evolutionary pressure could cause the spam masters to write semi-intelligent software to bot post useful on topic information

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    4. Re:Feedback loop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Feedback loop... by dargaud · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not necessarily. I think one important point when dealing with website trolls and spammers is not to delete their messages, but display it only for them if you can log their IPs / username. This way they see their own messages, but nobody else can. Kind of hard to do when the attack is distributed, though.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    6. Re:Feedback loop... by tqft · · Score: 1

      I would use the excuse of the of not knowing about that xkcd but there is an xkcd for everything and as soon as I saw the xkcd link I knew.

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    7. Re:Feedback loop... by N1AK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In some ways this isn't as much of a benefit as it might seem. Currently the spam reviews/emails etc are of such low quality that it is easy to mentally filter them out. Systems like this that require the quality to improve may decrease volume but will make it harder to spot the ones that get through.

      Ultimately this is why the 'social web' is becoming so important. If I know the people who are telling me something is good then I know they aren't paid for posters. Obviously one side affect of this is that companies are realising that 'influencers' (users who drive adoption amongst their social group) are more valuable and trying to buy their love.

    8. Re:Feedback loop... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Even so, some organizations seem to consider it worthwhile even at elevated prices. In the forums of www.Spiegel.de (a German news magazine), I sometimes notice first-time posters who defend $CORPORATE_POINT_OF_VIEW with rather eloquent wording. To me that looks a lot like professional advertisers being paid to influence the discussion.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    9. Re:Feedback loop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like a.k.a. "arms race" (in the game theory sense).

    10. Re:Feedback loop... by skids · · Score: 1

      Except the "ability" to build webs of trust across social networks is a step backwards compared to when sites were small and actually had moderators who cared to keep the quality up. Mainly it is because this "ability" has not been developed beyond an infant level. There has been an incredible dearth in progress on interactive federated trust systems, both for encryption purposes, and for anti-troll/spam purposes. Can you tell a piece of software "I trust this guy to post good stuff, but I trust this other guy not only to post good stuff, but also I trust his list of other people who post good stuff" or "I trust this guy's original material but I don't extend that trust to his likes/dislikes of other material" and then expect the system to use that information intelligently to help you filter? Probably not. And that's just the first step -- then you have to make it usable for the average person in a way that encourages frequent tweaking.

      Now, since people seem to like to play with things like Mafia Wars/Farmville/4square and whatnot, one way to move forward in developing such a system might be to develop a game which allegorically involves either (as a hero) developing and effectively using a trust web or (as a villain) defeating the trust web. If you could manage to get a bunch of facebook addicts raving over that then you'd have the ultimate beta test team.

    11. Re:Feedback loop... by fa2k · · Score: 1

      I think one important point when dealing with website trolls and spammers is not to delete their messages, but display it only for them if you can log their IPs / username.

      The effect on legitimate users if they get banned in this way is very bad, and I consider this practice to be immoral. It should definitely not be automated.

      Just to check, can anyone see this message?

    12. Re:Feedback loop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to check, can anyone see this message?

      No.

    13. Re:Feedback loop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would use the excuse of the of not knowing about that xkcd but there is an xkcd for everything and as soon as I saw the xkcd link I knew.

      So where is the xkcd for "there is an xkcd for everything and as soon as I saw the xkcd link I knew"?

    14. Re:Feedback loop... by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Nah, what that is, is the PR Department (or hired PR firm) of the firms in question (the ones mentioned in the articles) assign the equivalent of interns to trawl such websites for articles about their company, and to "upvote" or post "positive" messages in support of the company (and do the opposite against negative messages).

      It has little to do with the Marketing Department (usually). We normally refer to those people as "astroturfers" or "shills" when being polite. I normally refer to them as "lying assmonkeys".

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    15. Re:Feedback loop... by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Actually, in a sense the old days with sites that were small and had decent moderation was a social network where you trusted the other members. We will see a massive move towards linking things like ratings to individuals in the next few years. In a social web system the effort to produce effective market swings by astroturfing is vastly increased and can always be amalgamated with the results of typical rating systems to provide a better result.

  4. SPAM race by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's just another SPAM arms race, the fact that nobody is challenging the reviewers yet is why it's so easy.

    1. Re:SPAM race by formfeed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's why I love /. !!

      A thorough review process makes sure that only the best and top quality posts make it to the front side, where intelligent and well educated people can add their remarks. A volunteer group of unbiased moderators that show the almost dream-like ability to not mistake witty irony for trollish flamebait then judges the comments purely on their merits. Wonderful!

    2. Re:SPAM race by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Then how did I get such good karma? o.O

    3. Re:SPAM race by symbolset · · Score: 1

      </sarcasm>

      You forgot to close your tag. You would think the AI folks could at least teach the bots how to html.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:SPAM race by artor3 · · Score: 2

      First mod in the door goes for "insightful" rather than "funny". Meta-humor or anosognosia? You be the judge!

    5. Re:SPAM race by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      A thorough review process makes sure that only the best and top quality posts make it to the front side, where intelligent and well educated people can add their remarks. A volunteer group of unbiased moderators that show the almost dream-like ability to not mistake witty irony for trollish flamebait then judges the comments purely on their merits. Wonderful!

      My sarcasm detector just clocked itself and started on fire. Damn you... I just got it replaced too...

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  5. Glad I'm safe! by RobinEggs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least we'll be safe in the English speaking world. Legitimate user reviews are always so intelligent and well-written I could easily distinguish freelancer's bullshit from the thoughts of intelligent users. Just look at the comments on Amazon and Youtube!

    1. Re:Glad I'm safe! by gearloos · · Score: 1

      Umm yeah.. good luck with that. I'd be a little more careful. Even Bablefish is pretty good now a days. Just saying...

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    2. Re:Glad I'm safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's Google Translate's attempt at a quick random spiel I wrote in Japanese:
      IPHONE
      I love Apple over IPHONE3. It very light! Clean, bright colors!

      Still has noticable issues...

    3. Re:Glad I'm safe! by Terrasque · · Score: 1

      Umm Yeah .. and good luck. I will be more careful. Even Bablefish is pretty good, now a days. Just saying ......

      English -> chinese -> english again, in google translate

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    4. Re:Glad I'm safe! by somename · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you're just being sarcastic as I find sifting through reviews on Amazon (whom I think has one of the better customer review system) annoying enough. I do wonder if these spam reviewers target websites in other major languages also. I mean it's fairly easy to find someone to write English semi-competently pretty much any where in the world. I'm not sure if that's true for even for a language such as Spanish.

    5. Re:Glad I'm safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spelling hints that you're one of those drones promoting Babelfish. "Pretty good" may be good enough if you are a unicorn, but for the rest of us it is just the difference between "exquisite" and "unlimited beautiful":

      http://brog.engrish.com/2011/11/23/brack-fryday-is-coming/

    6. Re:Glad I'm safe! by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      I host about 100 websites on my web server and pretty much one of them are harmed by blocking china in my firewall. All I want now is a service to provide an update of their ip ranges once a month or so.

  6. Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Informative

    This "army" has been a staple of the CCP for years. They're usually pretty easy to spot on Chinese language sites and (increasingly) on English language sites. The name comes from the reputed 5 mao (or 1/2 of a Chinese yuan) they're paid for each message. That's about 7 US cents. For the Chinese psyche, it's much more satisfying to see a large number of shill posts that "agree" with the party line than to "waste" effort on even a thin veneer of truth.

    1. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This "army" has been a staple of the CCP for years. They're usually pretty easy to spot on Chinese language sites and (increasingly) on English language sites. The name comes from the reputed 5 mao (or 1/2 of a Chinese yuan) they're paid for each message. That's about 7 US cents. For the Chinese psyche, it's much more satisfying to see a large number of shill posts that "agree" with the party line than to "waste" effort on even a thin veneer of truth.

      Isnt' it a tad racist to classify an entire large group of people as having a certain, characteristic, ascribed "psyche" or tendency on the basis of nothing more than having the same genetic race in common?

      I don't think you hate them or anything but I don't think you've really thought about why you believe this.

    2. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some things are racist, this sounds more like cultural bias, if you will. I would say similar thing about social norms, but given the context, the same words can be deemed racist, or enlightening.

    3. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some things are racist, this sounds more like cultural bias, if you will. I would say similar thing about social norms, but given the context, the same words can be deemed racist, or enlightening.

      So it's not like telling a "nigger joke", then?

    4. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by earls · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      the psychological trends are clearly slanted.

      FTFY

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I laughed at your comment.

      then I came back an hour later and wanted more.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by chad_r · · Score: 1

      The CCP?? Do you really think the Communist Party is paying for these ads? Or was "China" too long to type?

    8. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the CCP. None of the other shill political parties in RPC are being advertised, so this "water army" is an internal organ of the CCP, rather than the state.

    9. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are often classified as having certain tendencies in foreign media, is that racist? Chinese, like Americans, are not of one single race, there are dozens of ethnicities, as China often likes to point out. If ascribing certain characteristics to Americans isn't taboo, why should it be so for other nationals?

    10. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by abigor · · Score: 2

      The 50-Cent Army doesn't actually post ads so much as disinformation. If a news site publishes a story that is somehow critical of China, the comments section will be filled with "50-centers" defending China mostly by way of deflecting criticism back onto the west somehow. It's quite common on Canadian news sites such as the Globe and Mail, to the point where the editors starting mass-banning obvious 50-center accounts. It's widely accepted that the 50-cent army is paid by the Chinese government.

    11. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnt' it a tad racist to classify an entire large group of people as having a certain, characteristic, ascribed "psyche" or tendency on the basis of nothing more than having the same genetic race in common?

      In this case they have much more than a genetic race in common. Especially they've been raised in the same country under the same totalitarian system. And I'm pretty sure that your youth-time education resp. indoctrination has vastly larger effect on your way to think than local/racial variations in your genome ever could.

      Now whether the claimed structure of thinking does or does not exist in China, I have no idea. But claiming so, rightly or wrongly, is definitely not racist. There's no reference to a race whatsoever.

    12. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      They dont even have "the same genetic race in common". China is an enormous country that spans a large number of diverse ethnic groups. In many ways, southern Chinese ethnicities are as "genetically chinese" as people from Korea or Vietnam. You might say its a "melting pot", like the US has been called, except that the diversity is indigenous rather than immigrant.

      All that said, there ARE certain generalizations you can make about Chinese which even the Chinese make about themselves-- such as identifying themselves with their country (as one told me, when people in the US criticize the Chinese government, its people are liable to take it personally, whereas in the US that is a lot less likely). National identity can play a big role in people's attitudes and thoughts.

    13. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that the CCP has nothing to do with this article?

    14. Re:Wu mao dang (50 cent gang) by couchslug · · Score: 1

      What do you expect from a country that uses toddlers as speedbumps?

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/23/chinese-toddler-death_n_1027153.html

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  7. Slashdot Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like Slashdot. Very good website.Soulskill best editor ever.

    1. Re:Slashdot Good by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 3, Funny

      slashdot.org the best news site for apple!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      To be fair it's better than a goat sea hurricane army. But still dishonorably dirty at sugarcoating enough praise to give web sites diabetes.

    2. Re:Slashdot Good by RobinEggs · · Score: 2

      Well I was still trying to make sense of that one right up to the word "diabetes".

      Good God I'm easy....

    3. Re:Slashdot Good by symbolset · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you ever used it. Dont brag, I am an iPhone lover, but WP7 is good. Used all three platform now . No doubt WP7 is better. I am not a fanboy of anyone though. Try reading the reviews you will understand why eveyone is behind WP7. I think Microsoft has learned a lesson and turned around.

      - A verbatim reply to one of my recent posts somewhere else. Hmm... 7 cents for that? They overpaid.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:Slashdot Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bad man! You spammer! You go wash soap in mouth or bring to justice circumstance directly!

  8. No different from slashdot really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What could possibly go wrong?
    In soviet Russia ....
    Some jingle by the Golden girls
    etc, etc, etc

    1. Re:No different from slashdot really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, you thank me for being a friend! Road travels up and down you! And if a party threw you, I would be from the biggest gift.

    2. Re:No different from slashdot really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cosmonaut, you idiot.

  9. That is "amazing" .... NOT! by JimCanuck · · Score: 1

    88% to spot paid posters? Stick around the internet long enough and you can recognize them with better abilities then that software.

    This post was a paid poster. Peddling a product that is less effective then other means available to people with a half decent but also half lousy reasoning as to why we need it.

    Jim

    1. Re:That is "amazing" .... NOT! by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah but try using that skill on 10,000 posts. You'll see why you want automated software after your brain melts around post 1000 or so.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:That is "amazing" .... NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look for the username CmdrPony. The latest nick in a long illustrious line of shills going back to Soppsa, cgeys, techla, and culminating with CmdrPony. Guess what? In a month, he will abruptly stop posting and another will come and take his place.

    3. Re:That is "amazing" .... NOT! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      That sounds like most slashvertisments.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    4. Re:That is "amazing" .... NOT! by Kickstart70 · · Score: 1

      Some I see woefully-uninformed users posting on politically-sensitive topics on a variety of forums. For a while I was half convinced that they were paid shills posting their re-wording of directions given to them. Then I realized mostly they were just idiots.

  10. slow news day again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the comments in the linked article said, paid shills and astroturfers are a fact of life since time immemorial ...and ooooo....they're now doing it in China....ooooo.....I'm scared.....

    1. Re:slow news day again by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Well, this article was a paper about how to detect them

    2. Re:slow news day again by fsckmnky · · Score: 1

      Just firewall all of China. Problem solved.

    3. Re:slow news day again by inpher · · Score: 1

      China is trying, but then there is this free speech movement that tries to poke holes in that great firewall all the time.

  11. uhm but this is also how the API works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a bunch of other 'legitimate' news websites.

    their overlords at corporate get some backhanded deal going, from govt or business, they agree to spam-blast information.

    you arent just fighting 'underground spammers'. you are fighting the very concept of Public Relations.

    1. Re:uhm but this is also how the API works by yuhong · · Score: 1

      To be more precise, legacy PR based on controlling the message. "PR 2.0" don't have these fundamental problems

  12. How do we know this is not a generated story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if this how slashdot plans to continue having random quality stories on weird topics that look good on google trends?

  13. How about an example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Properly for being sincere, My partner and i had not been hoping to uncover such type of information unintentionally, since I did so, because Not long became aware of your site when I was actually running a lookup with Bing, seeking a thing extremely close and not identical Nonetheless at the moment I am above able to possibly be here along with I’d like to add that your standpoint is incredibly useful despite the fact that any trifle debatable towards the accepted I’d personally instead say it really is as much as open argument nonetheless I am just worried to help you an enemy, ‘, ‘, haya Nevertheless, in case you want to speak more over it, you should respond to the remark and also I’m going to attempt to signed up making sure that I am recommended plus return to put far more Your brand-new pal

  14. This article very Super Good Thing ! by gearloos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot Very Good Super Big Fun Site! Very Like Much Good For You Fun! Rate 5 Star Posted.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:This article very Super Good Thing ! by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Hey! I see what you did. You're sneaking a very favorable /. review of Slashdot into your comment.Clever.

      The mods should be more careful. I suspect you might be one of the spammers. You have 2.5 minutes to respond.

    2. Re:This article very Super Good Thing ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either those spammers are so bad you can identify them by that kind of text or they are real good and post that kind of text in purpose.

  15. Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Community by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 0, Troll

    They just keep cutting and pasting the same debunked arguments and pretend that nobody notices.

  16. What they do becomes a list of what not to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stagger the day's activity across forums so it's not one account posting every 2.5 minutes, throw in a bunch of "lol" or "qft" comments in other threads, disable the CTRL button and right clicking on the PC, and make sure to post something, anything weekly for a few months. Boom, defeated.

  17. Blackhole apnic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is why I blackhole all of apnic

  18. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Michael Kristopeit is cowering.

    China = sluicegated.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i'm not hiding... i'm michael kristopeit. i live at 4513 brittany ct. eau claire, wi 54701. my phone number is 715-514-0916.

      why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

      you're completely pathetic."

  19. TDMA works with water pipes by poppopret · · Score: 1

    TDMA is "Time Division Multiple Access". In other words, we use time slots to control pipe usage.

    This will definitely work as long as the time slots are big enough. The city sends water for an hour, drains the pipe so that it can serve as a waveguide, transmits ultra wideband internet for an hour, then fills the pipe back up so that water can be transmitted again. Throughput will be excellent.

    1. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      TDMA is "Time Division Multiple Access". In other words, we use time slots to control pipe usage.

      This will definitely work as long as the time slots are big enough. The city sends water for an hour, drains the pipe so that it can serve as a waveguide, transmits ultra wideband internet for an hour, then fills the pipe back up so that water can be transmitted again. Throughput will be excellent.

      No need to drain a water pipe to move RF through it. Water pipes really could be used, although I wonder about signal degradation especially around bends.

    2. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by Vegemeister · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, you'd definitely have to drain the water. Water attenuates RF like the dickens. It's usually slightly conductive, and the Van der Walls bonds give it a large permittivity at low frequency, and a large imaginary (lossy) permittivity at high frequency. To communicate with submarines, they have to use extremely low frequency signals in the hundreds of Hertz. At one point, Britain had a plan to turn an entire island into an antenna.

      Another way to observe the effect is to put a cup of water in a microwave oven.

    3. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I knew about submarines and their massive retractable antennas and I've used a microwave but never mentally connected them before.

      But does it have to be EM? How about sound?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by greed · · Score: 1

      Right, and there's prior art using soundwaves as memory: mercury delay-lines.

      Just don't close the loop and, instead, you have a point-to-point sound transmission system.

      In the Real World, that nasty place that makes all our math hard, you'd have to deal with reflections and "impedance mismatches" (where pipes of two different sizes meet). How it would work if you went with an Aloha-net style multiple transceivers on a shared medium I'm not sure, but... I could see a decent RFC coming out of this for the day after March.

    5. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But, but, I have well water. What's the frequency?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    6. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia says the speed of sound in water is about 1500 m/s, so be prepared to deal with some latency.

    7. Re:TDMA works with water pipes by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      I dunno. My name isn't Kenneth.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  20. Unfortunately this is the status quo by gearloos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unfortunately this is the status quo. It's been long known companies like IBM, Microsoft, and Blockbuster, have been paying hordes to scavenge google or bing for posts like " Win 7 sucks" or Win 7 just as bad, and then post things like " I don't know, I have 3 computers running it and have zero issues like you say. Might be your hardware. This is just bringing it to the mainstreams attention IMO. I guess the days are coming to an end when I go to Best Buy to get something and look it up on my phone to get reviews. Now the kicker: How many times have you went to buy something from a non name brand and looked them up before using your credit card? Say you Google " mom and pop xx widgets R us" and the word scam or fraud. Well, when do the scammers start flooding the results to show stellar listings for the latest fraud sites? Kind of changes the whole community concept doesn't it? .. Just something to think about.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:Unfortunately this is the status quo by Elbereth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because someone never had issues with something that you dislike doesn't mean that they're a shill. This is something that bothers me a lot about modern discourse on the internet. You can't say anything without being accused of being a shill, troll, or fanboy. On the other hand, people credulously read outrageously biased review sites that give every single product they review 4/5 or 5/5. The absolute worst are tech and gaming sites. I forget which site it was (I think it was AnandTech), but a few years ago, one of the writers did a bit of investigative journalism and put out feelers to see how open hardware review sites were to the idea of paying for positive reviews. A small number of them (they refused to divulge who, unfortunately) openly agreed to it.

      The internet is full of trolls, fanboys, and shills, to be sure, but they're not hiding under every rock. Sometimes, it's just a normal person who's trying to express a legitimate opinion. Simply saying that you didn't have any problems with a product is not enough for any accusations, or else you risk labeling every single satisfied customer a shill (and, believe it or not, there a whole lot of easily satisfied people out there, and they simply won't be annoyed by the things that drive you fucking crazy).

    2. Re:Unfortunately this is the status quo by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      (and, believe it or not, there a whole lot of easily satisfied people out there, and they simply won't be annoyed by the things that drive you fucking crazy).

      And this makes their opinion of a product no more useful than the 'opinion' of a spammer. Strain them out with the same filter, please!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Unfortunately this is the status quo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tech sites and users deserve each other especially the overclockers ones. I mean how can you complain about a company because you think that if you buy 3 CPUs they should overclock the same. Being able to overclock one to 5GHz one to 4.5GHz and one just to 4Ghz isn't one of the advertised features and so you cant complain about that. If you want to overclock feel free, but don't complain that the chips don't have same limits. They are guaranteed to work at stock speeds.

    4. Re:Unfortunately this is the status quo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this makes their opinion of a product no more useful than the 'opinion' of a spammer. Strain them out with the same filter, please!

      Yet some people cast that net wider than they should...

      Many times I go for the negative comments and the positive ones. Then the middle ones. It has saved me more than a few times from a crummy purchase.

      I for example like MS products. Yet I would be considered a 'shill' by many. They are actually one of the few companies out there that will fix their crap (and they have mountains of it). Yet because I tend to like their products (I think in many cases they are better than open source ones and there are many open source things that are better than MS stuff) many filter me out.

    5. Re:Unfortunately this is the status quo by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      And this makes their opinion of a product no more useful than the 'opinion' of a spammer. Strain them out with the same filter, please!

      Yet some people cast that net wider than they should...

      Many times I go for the negative comments and the positive ones. Then the middle ones. It has saved me more than a few times from a crummy purchase.

      I for example like MS products. Yet I would be considered a 'shill' by many. They are actually one of the few companies out there that will fix their crap (and they have mountains of it). Yet because I tend to like their products (I think in many cases they are better than open source ones and there are many open source things that are better than MS stuff) many filter me out.

      Posting as AC certainly doesn't help to not get filtered out!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  21. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by symbolset · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's working for global warming. I mean climate change. No, enhanced weather variability. Wait, let me start again.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  22. BF3 vs MF3 by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    I think I noticed it a bit. Just a tad.

  23. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The new term was popularized because the common folk don't understand the difference between climate and weather. Doesn't mean "global warming" is really a less accurate term, since it refers to climate and global averages (as it always did). Thanks for trolling out, folks.

  24. Ni hao by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    They also move on from a discussion more quickly than legitimate users, discarding their IDs and never using them again.

    I bet not a one of them has as many IDs as Michael Kristopeit.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Ni hao by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Since he couldn't make it here today, I'll fill in for him.

      Cower some more, feeb. Ur mum's face has as many IDs as Michael Kristopeit.

  25. extreme advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Celebrities paid by sponsors to promote Nike, Adidas, Wheaties, Omega, Rolex, ... is the milder form.

  26. Water Pump? by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    I thought it was Russian hackers that got that water pump in Illinois, not the Internet Water Army...

  27. Re:IP address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, the internet would be a better place with half as much spam instantly if all providers did this.

  28. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not "Our little corner of academia." It's every major academy of science in the entire world. And they aren't focused on "messaging" because they are scientists, not PR flacks.

    It's true that in recent years the coordinated propaganda of the fossil fuel industry has managed to sway masses of uneducated people against the scientific community. But that's not because the fault of the scientific community. Some people out there are just going to believe whoever has the loudest microphone or the endorsement of their local pastor, no matter what the science says.

  29. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by symbolset · · Score: 0

    Keep telling yourself that if it makes losing more comfortable. It's that the fossil fuel industry is out to get you, that the public is a mass of morons. It's not about scientific integrity, credibility, or not being a prick to people you're trying to convince. Stay with that. It's working Grrrrreat.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  30. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by Terrasque · · Score: 1

    that the public is a mass of morons

    Well, that at least is a well-known fact. And if you never had the pleasure of working in a customer service job, and never got the chance to discover this fact for yourself..

    Then have a look at http://clientsfromhell.net/ and http://notalwaysright.com/

    --
    It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
  31. OK, yeah, but what about the Kardashians? by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    Never done the Twitter thing, I found the following posted on some humor blog, nice response to someone paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to do the 7 cent thing.

    - @KhloeKardashian: "OMG! Wheat Thins has a new limited time sweet cinnamon flavor. Why am I so excited about this?”
    - @Kris_Humphries (Not Kris Humphries): "Because you’re an idiot."

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  32. Non-english too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have been commenting on a some Danish sites regarding tech companies moving go China. One thing I have noticed about China is that everytime someone points out the worker conditions(enviroment / pay etc) or mentions something about human rights, the comments are rated down if options exists and it is followed with answers like "have I efter lived there?", "don't believe the newspapers" etc. But when I become specific, like comments on internet censorship etc, the defense stops or becomes vague nonsense.

  33. There are spammers in China by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Where is the news here?

  34. Try CorpSpeak by SoothingMist · · Score: 1

    CorpSpeak is a program readily downloadable. Given a few keywords it can generate loads of nonsense that makes perfect sense. It would be easy to apply that program to the subject application.

  35. Internet Water Army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth is truth. A kingdom even China without truth will not stand.

  36. tripadvisor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TripAdvisor is flooded by water army, too. Many comments are far from accurate.

  37. Workaround by Otonotachibana · · Score: 1

    Might as well use that stupid Great Firewall of China to do some good. Add "Free Tibet", "Ai Weiwei is innocent", and "Taiwan is a country" to your site to avoid this spam.

  38. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 1

    Keep telling yourself that if it makes losing more comfortable.

    Science isn't about "winning" or "losing" in the court of public opinion. Science isn't an American Idol finale where consumers vote for their preferred scientific theory and thus decide the fate of the natural world. Do you honestly not understand that? Do you literally believe that we should seek scientific truth by polling the opinions of our least educated citizens?

  39. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say this as someone who accepts the reality of climate change.

    If the public is a mass of morons, then the self-ascribed smart people who remain hostile to them, rather than alter their behavior to accommodate and guide them, are even greater morons. It is not the fault of the ignorant when they remain ignorant, but it is the fault of the enlightened to make enemies of the ignorant.

  40. I can write one of those, too.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. It deletes all the comments. Voila! Only 12% are legitimate anyway..

  41. Re:Glad I'm a safe! by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    Your comment is erudite and ermine. We would like to subscribe to your newsletter, please sent it postpaste with the next monorail.

  42. Simple fix. DAM for water army by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    We should write smarter webapps. You can detect floods easily via ip address. It's real easy to block by ip address, even a caveman can do it.

  43. Yikes! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    The Chinese are using 700 club tactics! Were screwed.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  44. crazy i just noticed that on tumblr this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had two new Chinese tumblr followers just this morning, both with very similar names, both using the exact same theme that has the exact same ads serving in it (that alone is a huge red flag. ads are a very non-tumblr thing), and they post HUNDREDS of images per hour. You either would have to be on crack or working in a sweatshop to crank out that volume of photobloggery.

    this kind of crap could totally destroy the tumblr community:

    http://araking2ns.tumblr.com/

    http://bettylee8vtl.tumblr.com/

  45. Not in Europe by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    We have alternating current, you know.

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
  46. Easy to tell by WDancer · · Score: 1

    I have been noticing this a lot more myself. I tend to skim over reviews with broken English, and it seems to be a good identifier if a review is legit or not. I especially skip ones that use texting shortcuts.

  47. How are these really different than... by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    who are paid to "flood" internet sites with comments and reviews about various products.

    all other media outlets around the world? Oh... one word difference. Replace 'comments' with 'articles'.

  48. amazon comments by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    That would explain some of the comments I've seen on Amazon recently for knock-offs made in China. The pattern is usually; several people make negative comments about the quality or usability of an item, or point out a flaw that makes the item practically useless. You then get several posts within a short span of time praising the product, and (usually) saying that the others didn't follow instructions or didn't know how to use the product. The praising comments are usually in questionable syntax and tend to use the same phrases over and over.

    Mind you, there *are* people who don't know how to use products they've purchased and blame the product, but it's odd that in some cases there are many who can't get a product to work, a few that think the product is great, and in all cases the few appear to know English only sparsely.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  49. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Science isn't about winning or losing. So when the folks at OPERA had some interesting findings about superluminal neutrinos they said "Hey, guys, this is interesting - our timers show stuff moving at greater than c. Help us investigate: here's our methods and data.

    But climatologists are all about preventing inspection of their methods and data to prevent political exploitation of it. So that's how it is.

    The former are scientists. The latter are politicians. Accept your role and get to winning. If you think social change is required to save the Earth from your predicted apocalypse you have two options: 1) persuasion. 2) force. Since apparently you don't have force yet because you've not persuaded men with guns nor the people who lead them, persuasion of the common man is the tool you have to induce change. And at that you're failing miserably because you're unloveable. You could try not being a bunch of pricks. The science isn't about winning or losing, but you're not doing science, so that's OK.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  50. Immune to feline packet loss by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    That's still a lot faster than a pigeon!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  51. Fark.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen this on Fark.com several times. It happens whenever there is a big military story going on somewhere in the world where the US has interests.

    The last time I saw it was when the Green Revolution was going on in Iran. Suddenly out of nowhere a million new people who I'd never seen post before were having these HOORAH conversations with each other and shooting down anyone who dared post anything to the contrary. It was pretty damned incredible, and a bit scary too.

    After the 19th or so NEWS FLASH story in a row they all just stopped posting altogether. But investigation of some of the accounts showed they'd been members longer than I had, but yet had very few comments aside from the whole revolution thing.

  52. Re:Spammers are like the Climate "Skeptic" Communi by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 1

    Look, you need to think about what you are saying because you are oozing ignorance.

    Anybody can see the data and methods of the climate community. Climate studies are published in detail in the most rigorous and prestigious scientific journals around, including Nature and Science. So if you think that OPERA's neutrino investigation is science nonpareil, then you should love climate science because Nature holds both to the highest standards.

    Meanwhile, the denial community never produces any peer reviewed publications. They just post on their blogs and give misleading testimony to Congress.

    Go to the library. Get a copy of Nature. Everything will be reprinted in more detail that you will care to read. Read it. Understand it. Then, if you still aren't convinced, go produce your own peer reviewed research and get that published in Nature. Until you or somebody else in the denial community can do that you need to stop bullshitting everybody with your bullshit allegations.