Slashdot Mirror


EU Targets Facebook's Ad System

redletterdave writes "The European Commission plans to put a stop to the way Facebook gathers information about its users, including their political opinions, religious beliefs, whereabouts and sexual preferences, and how the social network sells that information for commercial purposes. A new EC Directive aims to ban targeted advertising unless users specifically allow it, and to amend the current European data protection laws to ensure consistency in how offending sites are dealt with across the EU. If the European Commission has its way, Facebook would suffer big losses in advertising dollars that fund its site, which would further damage the company's plans to go public next year. Facebook has defended itself, claiming its advertisers target wide demographics like age and location, rather than specific individuals. The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company denies outright that it misuses or mishandles user information."

43 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. those europeans... by clavo-t · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those Europeans doesn't understand the right of an American company to do what they want wherever they want

  2. Re:More info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seems like real, sudden outbreak of common sense. Go EU!. I am moving to it next year.

    It should be much cheaper to move there next year.

  3. You can opt out by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Funny
    under options>settings>some data>settings options>options settings>user data>user data settings>user data settings options>ad's data>ad's data options

    Is that hard?

    1. Re:You can opt out by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The easier way to opt out is not to sign up for Facebook in the first place. Or what am I missing?

    2. Re:You can opt out by similar_name · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget to block Facebook on your computer. Since every website that has a Facebook Like button or other widget loads that widget from Facebook. Facebook still knows many of the sites visited from your IP. Of course the same is true for Google widgets/ads and pretty much any widget.

    3. Re:You can opt out by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    4. Re:You can opt out by Bucky24 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use Ghostery for Chrome. Works like a charm-I haven't seen a Facebook like button in almost a month.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    5. Re:You can opt out by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to block Facebook on your computer.

      Or block all of Facebook's IP ranges on your router (if it has that ability). I added their known IPv4 ranges to the facebook page on Wikipedia on 3 September 2011, but that information was removed by "Gary King" on 8 October. For educational purposes, the IPv4 ranges were (as of 3 September 2011):
      65.201.208.24 - 65.201.208.31
      65.203.134.64 - 65.203.134.79
      65.204.104.128 - 65.204.104.143
      66.92.180.48 - 66.92.180.63
      66.93.78.176 - 66.93.78.183
      66.220.144.0 - 66.220.159.255
      67.200.105.48 - 67.200.105.51
      69.63.176.0 - 69.63.191.255
      74.119.76.0 - 74.119.79.255
      99.188.162.240 - 99.188.162.247
      204.15.20.0 - 204.15.23.255
      208.252.1.128 - 208.252.1.159
      The reference I cited was at iBlockList, which may have been updated since then.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  4. The Internet should not be regulated by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not just Facebook, many other companies like Google do this. But although this regulation has good intentions, like all attempts at regulating the Internet it will be counterproductive and unenforceable. The Internet is based on anarchy, that's what made it big and drives it today. Securing their data is the duty of the users.

    1. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is not regulation of the Internet. This is regulation of advertising.

    2. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So Amazon should shut down, as no one can be expected to keep their credit card details secure on the net. Of course there should be regulation to protect people. Large websites, such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, et al. all can easily be assessed for compliance, and once compliant, a large part of the internet has been made compliant. How a user is supposed to actually *use* the internet without providing any data to it is going to severely limit the uses of the internet. We'll end up with LOLcats all over the place, and nothing of any actual use.

    3. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by forkfail · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about Facebook's constantly morphing privacy and security policies? How can the user protect their data from that?

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by SkunkPussy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      specifically the fact that it has become common practice for sites to treat opt-out as informed consent, when its well known that if opt-in was in place extremely low numbers would opt-in.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    5. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by forkfail · · Score: 2

      But that's like saying, "Don't use the web".

      No, I'm not arguing that Facebook == the internet. However, if you're going to use the internet for anything other than getting docs, if you're going to use it for personal communication, then there has to be an element of trust with the entity that carries and stores your data.

      Would you say, "don't use email" if a bunch of providers out there started making the contents of your email public? Or how about if your bank started to publish your account balance - would it be your fault for having used on-line banking?

      --
      Check your premises.
    6. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by mmcuh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't use Facebook, and occasionally venture out of the basement?

    7. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Securing their data is the duty of the users.

      I don't think you understand the power of data mining. Humans are very, very bad at performing inference on many variables. Computers are very, very good at it. It's true that people have a responsibility to safeguard their own privacy, but that's no reason we should have artificial intelligence programs scanning people's every online move to infer as much as possible about them. That's fucking scary, and it's scary that you don't think it's scary.

    8. Re:The Internet should not be regulated by Bucky24 · · Score: 2

      If the only social contact you have is through facebook I'd say that you're pretty anti-social already. Wall posts, messages, and facebook chat are not the same as a good face to face conversation. IE, hanging out.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  5. It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... steps are taken to ensure that Big Brother doesn't get too big.

    While here in the US, those who most love to cite Orwell also tend to want there to be no limits to what corporations can do, even when it's the corporations (far more so than the government) that are filling the power niches.

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by dave420 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's only ironic if you don't know what socialism is...

    2. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by Sique · · Score: 2

      No, you can't. Try to buy food without giving money to Nestlé or Monsanto for instance!

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem is, the end result of an unregulated free market is a monopoly, and without the counterbalance of government, corporations fill the role of government, and acquire the powers accorded to governments by the people. However, with this end result, there is no voting them out of office, and no one left to make laws to reign them in.

      --
      Check your premises.
    4. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      What's more ironic is that Orwell was a socialist himself. Interpreting 1984 as an attack on socialism is a gross misunderstanding - one that's taught by many teachers in the U.S. It's an attack on totalitarianism. Fascism, for example, is a free-market totalitarian system. Oceania was socialist because it represented Soviet Communism, the good intentions of Lenin warped into the totalitarianism of Stalin. It's important to note that Emmanuel Goldstein represented Trotsky, an opponent of Stalin's totalitarianism and Hitler's fascism.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    5. Re:It's ironic that in "socialist" Europe... by forkfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just as socialism can lead to totalitarianism, so can capitalism.

      Totalitarianism is the result of the concentration of power. If this is at the hands of a socialist government, you get the USSR. If at the hands of a corporate state, you get Germany in 1938.

      It's about balance. And those who oppose all government in the US (sometimes for good reasons) never seem to have another counterbalance to growing corporate power. Remember, the second part of the famous quote about "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is that "men form governments to ensure these rights".

      --
      Check your premises.
  6. Re:More info here by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they keep this up I might join you. The USA will probably make facebook accounts mandatory so the NSA can track us better.

    Yes despite all the terrible press the EU gets especially in the UK, there are some nice things coming out of it like forcing mobile phone companies to all use mini-usb chargers. Sometimes I wish England would stop dicking about in EU and actually commit to something bigger than themselves for reasons other than personal greed.

  7. I have an easier idea... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 2

    Don't post stuff to facebook that you wouldn't want public.

    I'm kidding, that's insane - who could possibly follow such a lunatic policy?

    1. Re:I have an easier idea... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Personal rule of thumb: Don't share anything on FB you wouldn't willingly share to a person you got stuck in a broken elevator with.

      Well, my conversation with other people in a broken elevator would concern the topic "how do we get out of here?"

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  8. People don't understand facebook by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To understand facebook it might help to use google as an analogy.

    Google is an advertising company that happens to provide services that inspire people to see the ads that they sell.

    Facebook is a data mining company that happens to provide services that inspire people to provide the data that they sell.

    They both offer advertisements, the both do data mining. In many ways the companies are very very similar. The biggest difference is the interface that is presented to the public. They both offer most of their services in exchange for what they need to sell to make a living.

    If you don't want to pay the price than don't take the service they offer. Or, just click the buttons to avoid telling the world about the things you'd rather the whole world not know.

    /not a facebook fan and thinks people waste way too much time on it

    1. Re:People don't understand facebook by bfree · · Score: 2

      I use my hosts file (or dnsmasq) to point googleapis to my local apache which has a jquery mirror to match theirs.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  9. Easy solution for facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only allow people to use their accounts if they agree to allow target advertisement... That would almost guarantee the majority will keep targeted advertisement over losing their accounts.

    Anybody honestly believe such a law will have much effect on a site like facebook? This law would be more effective against sites where there isn't an incentive to keep an account. Of course, they could have a clause in the law that forbids such requiring permission to have an account but kinda doubt they thought of that.

  10. Re:Why would FB care anyhow? by dave420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't have a clue about the EC if you claim that. Stop reading the Daily Mail and start reading actual newspapers.

  11. Re:More info here by masternerdguy · · Score: 2

    I dont click links here for obvious reasons.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  12. Easy opt-out by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Adblock+ works perfectly well for facebook just like it does for most other sites. I suppose an opt-in system is better, but adblock covers pretty much all websites while this half measure covers only facebook.

  13. The best way to avoid facebook getting your info by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Informative

    The best way to avoid facebook getting your info:

    DO NOT SIGN UP FOR FACEBOOK.

    Yes, they have alternate ways of tracking you and getting your information- but if you don't sign up for facebook you get more spare time, and less privacy stolen.

    If you already are a member- quit now before you give away some other facet of your life.

    Honestly- we all know how evil they are by now- so why do people keep using them? Is it really worth giving away every piece of information of your life just to play crappy games (that most slashdotters could write a better version of in an evening).

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  14. You're not facebook's customer people... by drachenfyre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously. If you aren't paying for it, you aren't the customer. You're the product being sold.

  15. simply solved by StripedCow · · Score: 2

    Facebook will simply solve this by presenting their users with an annoying popup that only goes away if you agree (opt-in) to the new EULA.

    So there's not much significance to all of this.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  16. Re:Nanny State! by Sique · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to your logic, we should get rid of the police, the justice and the military, because protecting yourself and punishing perpetrators is solely your responsibility.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  17. Re:The best way to avoid facebook getting your inf by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I was buying cell-batteries the other day and the retailer wanted me to enter a facebook user and password so it could automatically insert a facebook comment that I had purchased batteries from them.

    I remember thinking - WhyTF would I do that? Who on earth would want to post mundane information about what they buy online? IRS would looove to get a hold of their facebook profile no doubt.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  18. Re:More info here by loufoque · · Score: 2

    You do realize the only reason the UK are doing fine today is because they took a lot of EU money a couple of years ago when they were in a crisis and the rest of Europe was not?
    There are 27 countries. Not everyone can benefit from it at the same time. The EU exists to regularize things between member countries, so that they can balance each other out. Sometimes a country is at the bottom of the balance, sometimes at the top.

  19. Re:Why would FB care anyhow? by Bucky24 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not about to make a statement like GP did, mostly because I don't believe that the EU will collapse anytime soon, but I also am ignorant of its workings. So care to enlighten us?

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  20. Re:More info here by lgw · · Score: 2

    Which is great until countries start actively gaming the system, spending wildly because "of course we'll get bailed out". A bit less cycnically, it's easy for a political leader to give money to the people, and wait on austerity until it's externally imposed, at which point it's not the leader's fault, it's those evil EU baddies. Which could all still work unless most of the countries happen to need a bailout all at the same time, which is pretty much where we are today - it's doubtful there's enough strength left in the member countries that are doing well to help all the countries that need it.

    It's just as messed up in the US of course: we'll keep spending like drunken sailors as long as we possibly can, avoiding any attempt at a graceful solution because that would require admitting we have a problem, and an addict just doesn't do that until he hits bottom.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  21. Re:Best thing from the EU is the plane to NZ by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've chosen Brazil...

    I'm not sure that's an improvement.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  22. Re:More info here by rich_hudds · · Score: 2

    Care to back up that claim with anything? The 'only reason' the UK is fine is because it took a lot of money from the EU? We didn't take a lot of money from the EU, we are massively net contributors every year.

    The UK has never defaulted on its debts and considering we invented the concept of a 'National Debt' that is saying something. There is no way we would give up that record easily as it saves us a couple of points on our interest payments in perpetuity.

    I think we may have renegotiated a couple of bilateral agreements with countries during the World Wars but we've never defaulted.

    The Eu is a trap that is steadily making Europe less democratic. It's just effectively removed the elected Greek and Italian governments using the excuse that they cannot be trusted to do the right things.

  23. EU Law and Court by andersh · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's simple. The EU is similar to the US Federal government. The member countries are subject to EU law where applicable, they have signed treaties to that effect.

    If a member country does not apply the relevant law correctly, charges will be brought before the The Court of Justice of the European Union.

    If the member state loses the case it will be subject to punitive measures until it corrects the situation. There is a lot to lose for the member country in question.