Slashdot Mirror


Study Hints That Wi-Fi Near Testes Could Decrease Male Fertility

Pierre Bezukhov submits news of a report that "a laptop connected wirelessly to the internet on the lap near the testes may result in decreased male fertility," writing "'[The scientists who conducted the research] placed healthy sperms under a laptop running a Wi-Fi connection. After four hours, the Wi-Fi exposed sperms showed 'a significant decrease in progressive sperm motility and an increase in sperm DNA fragmentation' compared to healthy sperms stored for the same time in the same temperature away from the computer. That is, the sperms exposed to Wi-Fi were less capable of moving towards an egg to fertilize it and less capable of passing on the male's DNA if it does fertilize an egg.' The scientists blamed the damage on non-thermal electromagnetic radiation generated by the Wi-Fi." However, the experiment was based on sperm outside the body; the researchers (here's the abstract from their study) note that "Further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to prove this contention."

307 comments

  1. We now need... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    ...a nerd who agrees to have his balls for four hours under a laptop.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  2. Its a study that admits its incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and still people will use this as FUD for the next 3 decades.

    1. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You know, you're right. After reading TFA, you're even more right. Then again, I normally don't stick anything like wi-fi antenna's next to my sack. But considering the fetishes of some people out there, I'm sure this will be the next hot thing.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Talderas · · Score: 1

      As if it matters. This study doesn't indicate any long term damage only making the current crop of sperm impotent. Just dump a load and start to replenish stocks and the effect is gone.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yup, it's bollocks

    4. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      It takes 2 months for the current crop to form. So if this study found something real, the effect could last for a while. At least, long enough to matter if you're actively trying to conceive.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    5. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Tharsman · · Score: 2

      It is a given fact that once you get wifi you will have internet everywhere, this will translate to porn everywhere, this will translate to constant.... excercise that will lower sperm count... so yes! Wifi causes infertility!

    6. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by mandelbr0t · · Score: 1

      To what end, I wonder? I've seen stories of parents freaking out in Toronto over WiFi use in the classroom. I'm just not sure what they hope to accomplish. Certainly shutting down the world's WiFi is not even remotely possible. I've heard these people called neo-luddites. Even reading about that world-view makes no sense to me.

      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    7. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by tftp · · Score: 1

      At least, long enough to matter if you're actively trying to conceive.

      It's much cheaper to form a habit of climbing a tall tower every month and throwing a couple thousand dollars up in the air. You spend an hour doing that and then you are free for the rest of the month.

      Also you will become famous. Hardly anyone became famous only for having a child, though the child costs more.

    8. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, I normally don't stick anything like wi-fi antenna's next to my sack.

      I do. No fetish, I just have my phone in my pocket. I also don't want to have kids, so I don't see the problem, even if there is an effect, which I doubt.

    9. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and *IF* the effect is real in vivo, then not only would conception rates go down until the sperm are replenished, but the incident rate of conceptions *with mutations* would go UP.

      Most mutations would probably be lethal to the embryo and they would spontaneously abort, but depending on the type of damage some really nasty types of genetic conditions could be induced with increased fragmentation rates.

      I'd need access to the entire article to see what rates and types of fragmentation are present, but typically this means you are getting double-stranded breaks. Multiple double-stranded breaks in DNA can lead to all sorts of recombination events. Most typically, after a clean double-stranded break the natural DNA repair systems attempts to repair the damage by chewing away some of the nucleotides on one of the DNA strands. This can allow for homologous strands around different breaks to anneal, re-joining the DNA.

      Unfortunately this can frequently lead to the annealing of disparate chunks of DNA. i.e. some of chromosome 12 gets inserted into chromosome 7, important developmental or regulatory genes are disrupted, etc.

      I'd be interested in viewing population data to see if heavy laptop use correlates to fertility and genetic disease rates.

    10. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by tibit · · Score: 1

      Not only that, their control is dumb. They say they did the control in "identical conditions" but "without being exposed to the laptop". I mean, how stupid do you have to be? The control must be next to the same laptop with WIFI off, dumbasses. Only then can you be somewhat sure that wifi-on vs. wifi-off makes any difference. Maybe it wasn't wifi but vibrations from the hard drive, for all I know.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    11. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by sco08y · · Score: 1

      and still people will use this as FUD for the next 3 decades.

      Frankly, I think any study that finds a new cause for infertility or impotence is trolling for attention.

    12. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Actually, it seems that ... exercise ... increases the male fertility.

      Yeah, yeah, I know, whoosh.

    13. Re:Its a study that admits its incomplete by Pikkebaas · · Score: 1

      So you don't have a smartphone in your pocket?

  3. Insufficient data. by sgt+scrub · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't say what the compute was displaying. Porn has been known to effect the movement of sperms.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Insufficient data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the summary the experiment was based on sperm outside the body (but obviously very close to the computer) which might indeed indicate that porn was displayed

    2. Re:Insufficient data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to correct you on the usage of affect/effect, but I realized that both work.

    3. Re:Insufficient data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, in fact, "effect" is more amusing.

    4. Re:Insufficient data. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Is this obligatory; http://xkcd.com/326/? I can never tell...

  4. This calls for... by Shirogitsune · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a tinfoil codpiece!

    1. Re:This calls for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a tinfoil codpiece!

      A lead codpiece would be better.

    2. Re:This calls for... by CityZen · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the opposite: A crotch-mounted pouch to keep your iPod or smart phone in.

    3. Re:This calls for... by Bradmont · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points to give you for that....

    4. Re:This calls for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derek Smalls was ahead of his time.

  5. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trolling aside, this experiment doesn't sound like it had a control group, ie a laptop with no wi-fi being held over your balls. Heat in that area is known to decrease fertility. The experiment as described in the summary has nothing to do with wi-fi.

    (no, I didn't RTFA).

    --
    which is totally what she said
  6. I use a laptop all day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the: "Don't worry, baby. We don't need a condom. I know what I'm doing..." for the 21st century!

  7. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    You seem to have accomplished quite the feat: posting a comment that is less intelligent than the non-existent beings you describe. Bravo.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  8. Awesome by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1, Funny

    Awesome I'm going to connect my jewels to the web!

    Maybe then my wife won't keep pestering me to get snipped.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get snipped - it's an out patient procedure and quite painless really. The alternative of your wife having her tubes tied is more involved and some complications can arise from it.

    2. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      that's foolish, to do surgical damage to the body when so many near 100% effective alternative to either ligation or vasectomy exist (which themselves are not 100% effective either).

    3. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and there are even more complications for both of you if you have a(nother) "surprise baby".

    4. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Condoms are less effective and less enjoyable. The long-term effects of taking the Pill are not great for most women. We're done having kids, but not done having sex.

    5. Re:Awesome by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If we wanted a permenant solution. Yes.

      However- we're both young- both early 30s- whereas a vasectomy is sometimes reversible- it isn't 100%.

      If God forbid something happened to our kids or my wife- I can seea scenario where I might want to have kids again- or have kids with a new wife if something bad happened to my wife,

      An IUD is at least reversible and a better idea in my mind.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Awesome by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe then my wife won't keep pestering me to get snipped.

      Go ahead and do it. It's been five years for me and it's great. Everything still works.

      Of course, don't even consider it unless you already have children and you are in a long-term committed and successful relationship.

      Nowadays, they do it with laser beams and you don't have have sore nuts for a week or anything. My doctor gave me a tootsie pop (seriously) after he was done and it was great! I'd go do it again, but it would be kind of redundant, I think. Man, I loved that tootsie pop. It was the grape, which is my favorite.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Awesome by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      A correct vasectomy is 100% effective. The pussy ones that are reverse-able are the ones that are not.
      My doc cut out 1/2 inch of Vas on each, and then cauterized the ends, folded them over and tied them. they would have to untie each other, flip back and regrow a large distance to lose any effectiveness.

      Guys should man up and get a real vasectomy instead of the pussy out version that is reversible. Real men get snipped, it's the lesser men that refuse to.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So use the coil.

    9. Re:Awesome by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      I would love to hear what your near 100% effective alternatives are.

    10. Re:Awesome by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      See... you almost had me convinced to get one done until you told me the tootsie pop was grape flavour.

      I can risk the low-potential for impotence and inability to reach the "o"- but I can't risk getting a grape tootsie-pop over a different flavour.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:Awesome by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Real men get snipped, it's the lesser men that refuse to.

      Thank Goodness not all men are real then or the species would die out. ;)

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    12. Re:Awesome by The+Askylist · · Score: 1
      You've obviously never had the tip of your glans lacerated by that nasty bit that protrudes from a coil, or you wouldn't suggest that route.

      .

      Trust me on this - it's painful and annoying.

    13. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      modern IUD properly secured in the uterus don't do that, there is no protrusion from the cervix into the vagina. trust me on this, my wife has such. what medieval model did your partner use?

    14. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      many real men enjoy having the children in their family. If you have two or less, you're not contributing to population growth, as it takes 2.1 to do that.

      by the way, the world population will peak around 2075 and then decline, it's quite clear from the second derivative of the population growth curve. so, if you're straight and have found the ideal woman, man up, take care of a woman and her and your offspring for life.

    15. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      *Proper use* of quality condoms, *proper use* of quality birth control pills, well designed IUD.

    16. Re:Awesome by Surt · · Score: 1

      What if he wants to get some other woman pregnant? Just because his wife doesn't want any more children, and he wants a way to pacify her doesn't mean he should get snipped.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    17. Re:Awesome by Surt · · Score: 1

      There's no way to guarantee you won't be in the .15% whose vasectomies fail, so saying it's 100% effective is misleading. Also, there are a handful of cases of spontaneous healing of the gap in that .15%, so it's not even 100% for correctly implemented vasectomies.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    18. Re:Awesome by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      After the C-section and before they sew her back up is the best time to have your wife's tubes tied.

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
    19. Re:Awesome by Surt · · Score: 1

      And remember that half of all long-term committed and successful relationships are still going to fail, and that having had your children, you've put yourself in the category of more likely to fail due to the increased stress.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    20. Re:Awesome by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >Guys should man up and get a real vasectomy

      If it ain't fixed, don't break it.

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
    21. Re:Awesome by The+Askylist · · Score: 1
      Who said anything about protrusion?

      .

      Ok - just kidding. It was 20-odd years ago, so I guess they don't have a sodding great bit of nylon poking through the cervix any more. It was a very memorable injury, though.

    22. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might research the link between autoimmune disease and "getting snipped" first.

    23. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some would say that it's not enough to just "not contribute to population growth".. how about actually contributing to population reduction? 7 Billion of us seems already a tad excessive. Why wait until 2075?

    24. Re:Awesome by CityZen · · Score: 1
    25. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where do you come up with half of long term committed relationships fail?
      here's a hint - you are citing marraiges that fail, and I bet that most of
      those that fail are *not* committed and *not* long term.

    26. Re:Awesome by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well, marriage is pretty much the agreed upon societal definition for committed.
      Long-term is a hazier definition, I'd agree.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    27. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure to ask for the good drugs if your doc doesn't have this awesome new laser thing. Because your nuts WILL be sore for a week. (and yes, it was worth it anyway)

    28. Re:Awesome by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      First off, "real men" don't care what you or I think a "real man" is defined is.

      Second, this incessant need for growth is destroying us. Economies based on non-stop growth are failed economies, in the long run.

      Third, neither the girl nor myself want any children. Having them against both of our wishes just to keep growth alive is ridiculous.

      --
      Gone!
    29. Re:Awesome by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      If you have two or less, you're not contributing to population growth, as it takes 2.1 to do that.

      Some of us don't give a fuck aobut population growth.

      I have no kids (that I know of), and don't want any.

      I don't want to be tied down by the little anchors and have them suck all my disposable income away. Also, having kids...tends to force you to associate with just one lady throughout their lives...even if you don't like her any more.

      If you want to have kids, great...go for it, just try to do it with a woman you can stand for at least 18 years (kids really should have two good parents in a good household)...and be ready to sacrifice money, and time to raise them properly and be involved in their lives (do parents go to PTA meetings anymore?). And above all...don't BITCH about it...you chose to have them.

      But not having or wanting kids....real men feel that way too. I frankly don't want them, especially at an older age.....I like to meet different women, have relationships where we just have fun with each other!! Go out to eat and party, travel, have nice things....and not have to worry about kids in the mix.

      Not everyone wants the curtain climbers.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Awesome by sexconker · · Score: 0

      There's no way to guarantee you won't be in the .15% whose vasectomies fail, so saying it's 100% effective is misleading. Also, there are a handful of cases of spontaneous healing of the gap in that .15%, so it's not even 100% for correctly implemented vasectomies.

      99.85% of the time, it works every time.

    31. Re:Awesome by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      So you're an evolutionary dead-end in other words.

    32. Re:Awesome by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      *Proper use* of quality condoms, *proper use* of quality birth control pills, well designed IUD.

      Condoms are KNOWN to fail.

      Even proper use of birth control pills fail....I know, I've had to get rid of three of them even while chicks were on the pill.

      I dunno about IUDs, so can't speak directly to that...but I doubt they are 100% either.

      About the only sure fire thing is if she has a hysterectomy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:Awesome by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      I've taken biology. I know the consequences, and I have no problem with it.

      --
      Gone!
    34. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evolution and reproduction is not all gene based.

      As long as minds exists, memes, culture, religion and other belief systems can propagate and evolve.

      The humans are just the substrate.

    35. Re:Awesome by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Evolution is strictly genetic. All the others are merely artificial constructs, abstractions for those to disguise the real world. In a way, it can be summed up as style over substance.

    36. Re:Awesome by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      And remember that half of all long-term committed and successful relationships are still going to fail

      That's not true.

      You assume every marriage is "committed and successful". Nobody else does.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    37. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, even quality condoms can fail, however, the effectiveness goes from 83% to over 96% when used properly. The main problem with condoms not doing their intended function is improper use, not failure. UIDs are not 100% effective either (I did say near 100%, for some definition of "near"), and of course don't protect against STD.

    38. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Oral birth control is 98% effective when used properly, maybe you won that 2% lottery. Birth control pill plus condom has less than 1 in 999 rate of pregnancy

    39. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I don't think its a tad excessive, just an engineering problem with known solutions.

    40. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      note I said "many real men". basing our economy on a stupid premise is different than needing good solutions for the very few amount of growth decades left for the human race. Our economic structure is very flawed anyway, we allow a very small elite to have our lawmakers in their pockets. That's the core issue facing the human race. It causes pollution in lieu of using clean abundant energy, wars, poverty, slavery and imprisonment (for profit rather than punishment, and of largely victimless crimes), unemployment, etc.

    41. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      actually, more than 20 years, past the time the children are at home. yup, am doing that. have no desire to be with another woman and have never been with another woman since married. Wife and kids great investment for disposable (and non-disposable too, of course) income, I think. not for everyone, but I'd never change my past choice.

    42. Re:Awesome by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      We have a couple of medical terms for that 0.15%: Mommy! Daddy!

    43. Re:Awesome by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well, for a tight enough definition of 'successful', 0% of such relationships would fail. But then you literally have no idea if you're in one, so that's useless.

      The percentage of non-committed marriages is tiny.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    44. Re:Awesome by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty low odds, considering how many people are boning around the world.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    45. Re:Awesome by shadowrat · · Score: 2

      You keep talking about pussy vasectomies. I don't think you understand what a vasectomy is.

    46. Re:Awesome by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      But then you literally have no idea if you're in one, so that's useless.

      I have not found this to be true.

      Usually, if you're in a successful relationship, you know it. And when you're not, you know that, too.

      Maybe I have greater insight into relationships because my early dating years occurred before there was an Internet and ubiquitous personal computers, so I actually was able to go out and have relationships, both successful and unsuccessful.

      Now I've been happily married for 21 years, I have a pretty good idea of what it feels like to be in a successful relationship.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    47. Re:Awesome by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That BS is really annoying. The claims over difficulty and dangers of getting tubes tied is VASTLY over stated. Tubal ligation is a 30 minute out patient procedure. Women love to declare it as some huge health risk that requires days in the hospital and weeks of recovery, and men buy into it. It isn't, and it doesn't. The lie is part of our "hate the penis culture".

      http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002913.htm

      Tubal ligation is basically on par with vasectomies in difficulties and risk. Here is an idea. If the man knows he never wants to have another child he should get a vasectomy. If the woman knows she never wants another child, she should get tubal ligation. If they both know that they never want children, they should both get sterilized, and exponentially improve their odds of achieving their goals.

    48. Re:Awesome by Surt · · Score: 1

      That's a confirmatory bias. Lots of people think just like you do, right up to the revelation that their spouse is cheating. The ones who are right get to say: oh, but I was right, and they were wrong. I know my stuff, that other person didn't know what it meant to be in a successful relationship.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    49. Re:Awesome by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If your wife is pestering you to get snipped, you should call it what it is. Abuse. Trying to pressure someone into a medical procedure they don't want, and have no real need for is horribly abusive. Tell her to go get snipped herself. When she trots out the old lie that it is major surgery for her, just point her to the National Institute of Health's evaluation of it. And let her know it is a simple 30 minute outpatient procedure.

      http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002913.htm

      If you were joking, ignore that, or file it away as trivia to be used for some other joke in the future.

    50. Re:Awesome by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That's a confirmatory bias.

      Yep. That's the best kind.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    51. Re:Awesome by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, known solutions. War, starvation...

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    52. Re:Awesome by tibit · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Adds about $300 to the bill, if you're in the U.S.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    53. Re:Awesome by tibit · · Score: 1

      Here's what I don't get: why do so many people get hung up on population growth? I think Earth would be sustainable and more enjoyable with maybe 2-3 billion. There's way too many of us...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    54. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you're happy those kids will pay your pension once you have retired. You're just a freeloader.

    55. Re:Awesome by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      Would you drive to work if there was a 2% chance of you being horribly injured in a car crash?

    56. Re:Awesome by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      IUD's are not suitable for everyone. Birth control pills are not suitable for everyone. Sex with condoms is a different activity than sex without condoms, yes even "quality condoms".

    57. Re:Awesome by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      It's an excellent rate for the surgeon though. I was there and it literally took her 10 seconds per tube. That's $54,000 per hour.

       

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
    58. Re:Awesome by tibit · · Score: 1

      :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    59. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go ahead and contribute to population reduction, I want my genes to be passed on.

      There's two ways for me to contribute to population reduction; kill myself, or kill others. I don't want to do either, although there are people I wouldn't mind being killed, but I don't have the right to play God with the lives of others, and I'd rather not do the jail time.

  9. Good by Hatta · · Score: 2

    Free contraception!

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Good by ChristW · · Score: 2

      Didn't work for me...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  10. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by chill · · Score: 2

    Nor, it seems, did you RTFS.

    Quote, with relevant portion highlighted:

    The scientists blamed the damage on non-thermal electromagnetic radiation generated by the Wi-Fi.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  11. They're claiming it's not thermal damage by bandy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet every modern laptop has its wifi antennas carefully routed alongside the screen so that their polarization will match the WAP's polarization. Laptops get hot. Sperm want to live at 97F (definitely not at 98.6, which is average body temperature). What have they previously published? I smell an agenda.

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    1. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Should be easy to rule that out by using a USB wifi dongle on an extension near one sample, and a temperature-controlled object of the same size over the control (those dongles do heat up a little bit, not much, but you gotta be sure).

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Isn't the body of the laptop just a really big EMF shield anyway? So the one place where you wouldn't have exposure to the wifi signal is the underside?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. You said "dongle."

    4. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

      Laptops get hot. Sperm want to live at 97F (definitely not at 98.6, which is average body temperature).

      "...compared to healthy sperm stored for the same time in the same temperature away from the computer." So, if they didn't just screw up (always a possibility), the difference in motility cannot be due to the increased temperature near the laptop.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well they said that they have already controlled the temperature to be the same in each test.

      So either their methods are hopelessly flawed or this result doe snot have to do with heat.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Not really. In fact most newer laptop bodies are nearly 100% plastic, they only have a little metal in the hinges, no metal frames like in years gone by.

      Although most newer ones with removable underplates that give you full access to the internals also have a layer of aluminum foil sheeting on the underplate to help keep the bottom cool, that would probably shield anything under the laptop from the wifi antennas in the screen.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      "doe snot"

      What does Doe Snot have to do with it? is that a slang term for woman juice?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      *hur hur hur applefanboi* Unless its a macbook, then the whole thing is aluminum. /fanboi

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    9. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA: "A separate test also showed that merely placing sperm near a computer (without Wi-Fi) does not cause nearly the same damage, the report showed."

    10. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by IICV · · Score: 5, Informative

      They actually aren't claiming anything. I tracked down the paper (which was fucking harder than it should have been, the article didn't cite anything but the journal and month - turns out it was in the supplemental issue from September, not the main journal). The real citation is:

      A. Van-Gheem, J. Martin, L. Penrose, N. Farooqi, S. Prien, Short-term exposure to cell phone levels of radio frequency radiation do not appear to to influence semen parameters in vitro, Fertility and Sterility, Volume 96, Issue 3, Supplement, September 2011, Page S155, ISSN 0015-0282, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.610.
      (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211017079)

      I wonder why the article didn't cite it? Maybe because in the title itself, it says "do not appear to influence". Anyway, turns out it's not a real paper, it's really just a blurb about "We did this and it turns out nothing happened".

      Here's the results section:

      As expected, all measured semen parameters decreased with time (p

      So basically, I have absolutely no idea where this article came from. What it says directly contradicts the paper it claims to be reporting on. It looks like there is an agenda here, but it's not the scientists'.

    11. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Surt · · Score: 2

      It is now.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by bandy · · Score: 1

      2.4GHz Wi-Fi signals aren't the only EM signals generated by a laptop. Who here remembers computers playing music by executing carefully-timed loops using a properly-tuned AM radio to pick up the EMI generated by them?

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    13. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by wes33 · · Score: 5, Informative

      there are two papers: the Van-Gheem et.al. paper you cite and then there is the
      one the slashdot article is about, which is:

      Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. by Avendaño C, Mata A, Sanchez Sarmiento CA, Doncel GF.

      The authors are the Argentineans which the linked article mentions.

      It's (to be) published in Fertility and Sterility.

      So I basically don't know what you're going on about ...

    14. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the full article. It's probably pay walled. My institution has pretty good access.

      The article isn't that impressive and I find it lacking in a few places. Still, it looks very easy to retry, which is the important thing. I'd like to see this done in a much more controlled manner. It's just plain silly to use a laptop instead as a radio source.

    15. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF man. Isn't this like a horrible control fail? Couldn't they have tested in the exact same condition (near a laptop) but with the RF kill switch? Perhaps they did, and didn't get the results they wanted.

    16. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the fact that they didn't use that simple, readily available, cheap, and obvious way to isolate the wifi from the rest of the computer implies that they are either incompetent of have an agenda. I wouldn't hazard a guess as to which one it is though.

    17. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by IICV · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the end of the post got cut off because I had to leave for work and didn't proofread it enough.

      Anyway, what I'm going on about is this quote from the article:

      The study appeared in the September issue of the medical journal Fertility and Sterility.

      If you look at the September 2011 issue of Fertility and Sterility, the only thing involving wifi at all is the article I cited. I'm not sure how you got your citation, but it does look more like the paper the article is talking about - though it doesn't match the "already published in September" criteria.

    18. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>I smell an agenda.

      That's not an agenda you smell. Rather it's overcooked sperm.

      --
      Huh?
    19. Re:They're claiming it's not thermal damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell balls. Toasty, succulent balls.

  12. Natural selection by concealment · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you spend too much time on the computer, you're not having a full life.

    Reproduction should belong to those who can balance their interests.

    1. Re:Natural selection by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      because sex-obsessed people have the lowest birth rates of all?.....

  13. Now available,... by BonzoGariepy · · Score: 1

    ... wi-fi routers in a drugstore near you!

  14. Meh by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Non-AC'd cars, cell phones, now wi-fi...but I'm not worried. You only need to conceive a child a few times in your whole life anyways, worst-case scenario, you forgo the motorcycle and the big TV and lay down the cash for an artificial insemination procedure.

    (Can feel mom's hopes for grandchildren fading...)

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Meh by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Back in the 1970s tight underpants and tight jeans used to be the big threat to male fertility. Health scares move with the times.

    2. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Can feel mom's hopes for grandchildren fading...)

      Your mom's hopes for grandchildren faded when you first got on a computer...

    3. Re:Meh by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      It's about $2k for an IUI and about $8k for an IVF and it typically takes a few tries.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    4. Re:Meh by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      Back in the 1970s tight underpants and tight jeans used to be the big threat to male fertility. Health scares move with the times.

      I don't think you understand how tight some of those jeans were: they would still be a problem if worn today.

      Fortunately in the meantime all those boomers got fat so now everything is "relaxed fit" and size-inflated for safety.

    5. Re:Meh by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how tight some of those jeans were: they would still be a problem if worn today.

      How did you come to that conclusion? I was there. I wore them.

      Fortunately in the meantime all those boomers got fat so now everything is "relaxed fit" and size-inflated for safety.

      Sadly, I can verify that too.

  15. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Non-thermal electromagnetic radiation" means that electromagnetic radiation caused the effect through a nonthermal mechanism. It's a common idea in EM fear circles (because the output from EM devices is too low to cause damage by a thermal mechanism). It doesn't say anything about heat, one way or another. You can have thermal damage from EM radiation without any application of heat. That's what your microwave oven does.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  16. Hmm by lightknight · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most things placed near testes tend to decrease male fertility.

    Briefs, jeans, angry women...

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  17. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think these people are a figment of your imagination.

    I know it is hard to imagine, but there is a big huge WORLD beyond the door that leads out of your mom's basement. A world which sadly meets the OP's description to a T.

  18. All my plans in ruins! by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

    There goes my business venture for wireless-enabled codpieces.

    --
    Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    1. Re:All my plans in ruins! by CityZen · · Score: 1

      No, no; you just need to advertise a new feature.

  19. Sure it is the Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skyrim or WOW on a PC has been known to lower male fertility as well.

    1. Re:Sure it is the Wifi? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The Atari 130XE and collection of sci-fi novels my dad gave me access to probably did long-term damage to my fertility.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Sure it is the Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean I wasn't the only person with a 130XE? And yet I have two children...

  20. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

    The abstract specifically states that the control group was a set of identical samples, under the same incubation regime, without the laptop. So no, they didn't control for the idea that the laptop alone could've caused the effect

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  21. Sweet by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    At 24 I'm absolutely fine with being less fertile. I really don't need a kid right now or soon :P

    1. Re:Sweet by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      Good news for you, plenty of much more effective alternatives to bathing your genitalia in microwaves exist, research an ancient technology known as Birth Control. Effective versions of the condom, diaphram, IUD, and oral contraceptives have existed for millennia. You too can prevent your little swimmers from reaching an ovum!

    2. Re:Sweet by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      HAHA That should be a commerical

    3. Re:Sweet by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      In 10 - 15 years, when you really do want kids, it will be much more difficult.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    4. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/when/if

  22. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by chill · · Score: 1

    Thanks for explaining the difference. I hadn't thought through the subtleties.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  23. Stupid. Wearing PANTS decreases fertility... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As does a hot tub.

    Use of laptops in the lap.

    Anything that raises the temperature above 85-90 degrees Fahrenheit will reduce fertility - and passing 104 for an hour or two will reduce it to near zero for a couple of days.

    1. Re:Stupid. Wearing PANTS decreases fertility... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Celsius, permanently.

  24. it's a USB cable, I'll explain it later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those dongles do heat up a little bit

    heh heh

  25. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem. Those with Wi-Fi resistant balls will survive, the rest will disappear.

    1. Re:Evolution by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could bedazzle your balls with aluminum sequins, that will maintain full sack flexibility while guarding your nuts from the wifi waves, and you'll have DISCO BALLS! XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Evolution by Pope · · Score: 2

      Man, I don't want to see what happens when a pejazzler meets a vajazzler...

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed Hardy approves this message.

  26. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    To quote:

    compared to healthy sperms stored for the same time in the same temperature away from the computer

    That looks like it says a lot about heat to me, of course, I understand that you are thinking about the amount of heat put off by a laptop but it seems like they controlled for this by putting the wifi close but not putting the laptop directly on top of the sperm.

  27. Doesn't everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't everybody show a decrease in motility after hanging out online for 4 hours?

  28. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the kicker - they ran the laptop with the wifi switched off, but only measured the RF output of the laptop in that state. They didn't perform - or performed, but didn't publish - the obvious control experiment.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  29. Only the Strong Shall Survive! by Metabolife · · Score: 2

    May all the weak Wi-Fi afflicted sperm perish as their superior Wi-Fi resistant brethren overtake the womb!

    1. Re:Only the Strong Shall Survive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May all the weak Wi-Fi afflicted sperm perish as their superior Wi-Fi resistant brethren overtake the womb!

      That is how the first X-men were born

  30. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by bws111 · · Score: 1

    What? It says right in the summary: compared to healthy sperms stored for the same time in the same temperature away from the computer

  31. Wavelength by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 2

    How is a signal with a wavelength of 5" (wifi is around 2.4 GHz, 2.4E9/3E8*39.37in/m=4.9") supposed to interact with a human sperm, which, according to wikipedia, is comprised of a head 5 um long and a tail 41 um long, all of which total 0.002 inches. These arguments never ever make any sense to me.

    --

    Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    1. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microwave ovens operate on roughly 4-5" wavelength. They interact with water molecules just fine and water molecules are MUCH smaller than sperm. But that's a thermal reaction.

    2. Re:Wavelength by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 1

      Touche, AC, and I agree with you, but as you point out (and I neglected to) the interaction between the RF generated by a microwave and water is a thermal reaction.

      --

      Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    3. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're not thinking. How large is a water molecule? And yet liquid water boils in a microwave oven (4.8" wavelength).

      The explanation, if you were wondering, is that the microwave hits near the resonant frequency of the water's H-O-H vibration mode. Effectively, the peaks move the O one way, and just as it's bouncing back the trough accelerates it the other way, causing a build-up of kinetic energy in the molecule which is a fancy way of saying it heats up.

      Put sperm in a microwave and see what happens. It's mostly water, after all. Hell, go put your head in if you're that confident about your EM science. After all, it's not like your head contains any antennae, right? Apart from EVERY SINGLE POLAR MOLECULE IN IT.

    4. Re:Wavelength by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Wavelength. By this logic, you wouldn't be able to hit a badger with a javelin?

      Of course, that's probably a terrible analogy. I never took much in the way of physics.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    5. Re:Wavelength by greed · · Score: 0

      I've never found the "microwaves make the water molecules jiggle" explanation.

      As an Electrical Engineer, I've found "plane wave propagating in a lossy medium results in heating within that medium" to be a much more compelling explanation.

      And, of course, as the thermal energy of water--or any matter--increases, the motion of the molecules increases. So "microwaves make the water molecules jiggle" sure, but they do it by raising the water's temperature--not the jiggling causing the raised temperature.

    6. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is caused by heat, witch in turn is produced (presumably) by Wi-Fi, but noy only (ie. varicocele). It is a known fact that testes need a lower temperature than that of the body for the male to be fertile. That's why they are hanging out there, you know.

    7. Re:Wavelength by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Temperature is a measure of how much jiggling is going on, not a basic characteristic.

    8. Re:Wavelength by martas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny analogy, but what OP is hinting at is the intuitive notion that all radiation interacts with objects roughly its "size", i.e. wavelength. A better analogy for this would be if a bunch of people, ranging from tiny elves to enormous giants, tried to grab a badger -- the elves would only be able to grab a single hair on it, and the giant could grab the mountain it's sitting on but the badger could escape between his fingers. Only a person of just the right size could actually grab the badger. So, for example, IR interacts with large molecules thus heating them, which is why objects that are just hot enough to glow a little red feel so hot from a distance; UV is much smaller wavelengths, so it tents to break up large molecules (e.g. DNA), thus causing cancer and killing bacteria (essentially acting as poison for them); xrays interact at an atomic level, which is why they are so useful in imaging -- individual atoms block/"refract" them in different ways, creating different patterns (e.g. in xray crystallography); finally, gamma rays are so tiny that they interact with nuclei, and are capable of being absorbed by said nuclei which then become radioactive themselves (i.e. "hold on" to the gamma ray for a while and release the energy after some random period of time), or of breaking off individual protons/neutrons from the nucleus, or even splitting it up. This intuition can get you pretty far, but it doesn't explain everything -- for example, microwaves heat things through an entirely different mechanism, as some people mentioned above.

    9. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that the 2.4ghz band is theunregulated because it was considered useless for long distance communication due to it being so easily absorbed by water. The band is also occupied by microwave ovens for the same reason: it heats water molecules.

      TFA only tested sperm outside the body, so don't count on sperm stuck to the screen being particularly fertile. Inside the body, the first cm of (ehem) ski and flesh is full of water and should absorb most of the RF, protecting tomorrows sperm from today's laptop session.

    10. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      This subthread seems to be a great hangout for EEs who don't understand physics.

      Your "compelling explanation" is not an explanation, but a statement of the effect. The explanation for the effect is *precisely* that the EM wave causes the polar molecules to jiggle in response, thus heating them, and the Newtonian reaction to that is that the jiggling molecules themselves create EM waves which are out-of-phase with the primary wave and hence attenuate it through interference. Thus, from a macro point of view you see that the waves are attenuated and you say "where did the energy go? oh it's in the water - water must be a lossy medium for 2.4GHz waves." But the micro point of view is the actual *explanation* - it tells you *why* water is lossy at 2.4GHz (and not so much at lower frequencies). It's because 2.4GHz is around about the resonant frequency of the jiggles.

      To put it another way, the microwaves don't make the water molecules jiggle by raising the temperature - the microwaves make the water molecules jiggle *directly*, through direct interaction of the EM wave with the charges on the molecules. The temperature rise is a *consequence* of that (the other consequence being attenuation of the microwaves).

    11. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why yes, you're right! Now if you'll pardon me, my AM radio has suddenly stopped working, I guess I need to go stick a 1000ft antenna on it.

      It has been known for at least a decade now that there are mechanisms by which sub-ionizing radiation can affect biological processes via non-thermal mechanisms. Affecting the kinetics of enzyme reactions is one such mechanism. And yet, every time someone comes out with a study on the subject, laypeople -- usually with the engineering mindset of "if I can't figure out how it could happen, it clearly can't work, because I know the rules dammit" -- immediately assume that the only ways in which EM radiation can couple to biological processes are ionization or thermal mechanisms. The particularly clever ones out there will recognize the fact that they can still see red and green, so maybe they ought to broaden their horizons a bit.

      Now, I don't know if I buy that wi-fi affects sperm motility or not, but there is no cause to dismiss the notion on principle. Biochemistry is a lot more subtle than any of us understand.

    12. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heating is not the only thing which can happen when you energize molecules.

      The, "It doesn't ionize" argument is very limited, and generally used by people who resist thinking beyond comfort zones.

      Chemical reactions and molecular behaviors can be, and in fact *are* altered when they experience changes to their energy levels, which they do thanks to a little phenomenon called "sympathetic resonance".

      This affects many aspects of cellular life, in particular, human nerve cells, which is why this is all important. (Seriously, people who are primarily concerned about their sperm swimming slowly are missing the point. Perhaps because their brains are fuzzed out.)

      The take home: EM doesn't have to burn cells in order to affect them negatively. It's rather more complicated (and interesting) than that. But this knowledge has been available for years now. At this point, if people don't know it, it generally means they're avoiding it.

      Normally, it wouldn't bother me. I don't have to have a cell phone or WiFi-enabled devices. But walking down the street, visiting something as simple as a coffee shop, means a legion of dazed fools around me are filling my environment with brain-fogging EM pollution. They look stupid; they sound stupid. They are drugged-out cows. That's alarming enough. But when I feel my own mind being affected by their poison, it becomes much more frustrating.

      Finding people capable of intelligent conversation becomes increasingly difficult as the years go by, I doubt very much it's because I'm getting any smarter.

    13. Re:Wavelength by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      This is not the website you're looking for.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    14. Re:Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The resonance frequency of water molecules is a good order of magnitude higher than what you mention.

    15. Re:Wavelength by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      "That girl has some serious temperature"

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  32. Re:Great fodder for the pro-lifers by TerranFury · · Score: 1

    I believe I've read of tribes in some locations (the Amazon?), in which it is common practice for men to immerse their testes in very hot water one (or more?) times a day as a contraceptive method. By itself, I imagine it's not tremendously effective, and I wonder what the failure rate is. Anybody want to dig through pubmed?

  33. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

    this experiment doesn't sound like it had a control group, ie a laptop with no wi-fi being held over your balls.

    You should indeed RTFA: "A separate test also showed that merely placing sperm near a computer (without Wi-Fi) does not cause nearly the same damage."

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  34. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm not as up to date with the fancy physics talk as I use to (or even should) be, but going back to my old college courses...

    Isn't 'thermal' fancy physics talk for 'heat'?

  35. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well yeah, that would be gross and messy.

  36. Going call bull pucky on this one by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

    I'm an admin and have been using a wireless laptop since wireless b came out. My wife and I couldn't have kids for the longest time so we went and got tested. I'm told normal sperm count is 50-60 million. Mine's 480 million. I would think the heat from an improperly vented laptop would be more of a negative that any radio waves. -m-

    1. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Just to play devil's advocate (not that I accept the study - I think it's flawed), one data point does not equal proof. Perhaps your sperm count would have been 600 million had you not been using the laptop.

      I do agree that the heat is likely a bigger issue than any WiFi radiation.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, one guy's freak-like ball population is definately enough evidence for me to close the case.

    3. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Surt · · Score: 1

      This study doesn't claim it had an effect on count. How was your motility rating?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      480 million mutant sperm

    5. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by martas · · Score: 1

      Wait, so heat and wifi actually INCREASE sperm count 10-fold?! The world must know!!! Statistics, motherfucker, do you understand it?

    6. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out an important factor that determines what your post actually says: what's the reason why you and your wife couldn't have kids?

      Was it a problem with your wife or your 480 million sperm count? Or "holding it wrong"?

    7. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in IT. Therefore I am in a perpetual state of arousal. At 42 I think about bumping uglies as mush as I did when I was 16. Poor wife needs a crach helmet or padded headboard.

    8. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were too crowded? :D

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    9. Re:Going call bull pucky on this one by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      A month later they realized the printer wasn't outputting periods.

  37. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nor did you even RTFS. The control is mentioned *right there*.

  38. More Wi-Fi! by MoronGames · · Score: 1

    More Wi-Fi will make more less fertile men. Many people believe that we currently have overpopulation issues, so this could be an excellent way to fix it. Free laptops for every male!

    --
    hey!
    1. Re:More Wi-Fi! by treeves · · Score: 1

      Problem, there is now, I suspect, a negative correlation between fertility rates, and wireless device usage, for other reasons, like educated women (e.g. Japan: many wi-fi devices, negative population growth, Sub-Saharan Africa: high fertility, few wi-fi devices. Need to turn that around to some extent. Wi-fi is not the answer.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  39. Not entirely shocking if it was. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most EM radiation is inherently dangerous in long term exposures, including visible light.
    Hell, Ultravoilet can destroy your skin surface in a few hours on a sunny day, more so if you are at the equator.

    Certain frequencies could vibrate molecules or chains of them to pieces, even multiple frequencies working together could do it by creating interference with each other, if exposed over a long period of time in the right doses.
    We know this works because it is essentially the implementation basis of microwave ovens.
    Although they go further and actually use the dielectric effect to significantly increase the moving of energy in to the material.
    Is it so hard to realize that a "lesser optimized" radiation source is capable of doing lesser damage, and is much rarer too?
    I don't want to give anymore fuel to the idiots who use this to push some sort of agenda down everyone's throat, but let's be serious here, EM can and does do damage to things whether we want it to or not. Biology certainly ain't immune to those effects either.

    I still don't understand why the wireless cards aren't built in to the monitors.
    What's the deal with that? Huge plastic frame could have an antenna in it too, "nope, can't be doing that, too smart, we like our frames empty and useless."
    The things are tiny, they could easily be made tall and thin rather that more or less square-ish.
    All for 1 or 2 extra wires coming through the socket. Its not like laptop users for the most part care about the extremely tiny increase in latency of not being directly slotted in to the board.

  40. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that the "same temperature" is really what they measured. All the abstract says is that they were incubated under the same conditions.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  41. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it also has more nuanced meanings, and there's one that is very pertinent to this field.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  42. Sperm ex vivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the abstract:

    Donor sperm samples, mostly normozoospermic, exposed ex vivo during 4 hours to a wireless internet-connected laptop showed a significant decrease in progressive sperm motility

    If your sperm are outside your body and exposed to a laptop, then... ummm... that was a nice web site... but umm... after 4 hours they are kind not viable sperm any longer. I question how much this study tells us.

  43. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

    That news report is wrong. The seperate test in question evaluated the RF output of a laptop with its wifi switched off, but it did not measure sperm motility after exposure to that laptop:

    "A separate test with a laptop that was on, but not wirelessly connected, found negligible EM radiation from the machine alone."

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45469130/ns/health-mens_health/#.TtT0PlabUlT

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  44. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Troll

    Most of them I see are raving frothing at the mouth android owners who cant afford iDevices.

    God, just STFU about your fricking phone, nobody cares about it. I dont run around rubbing my iphone in your face whenever I see you talking on yours. Yet you haveto announce to the whole world, "Look there's another apple sheep" while I stand there making a business call.

    Makes me think all Android owners are immature children.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  45. Not buying it. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    In addition to the usual arguments about wave and particle energy density of light in the radio spectrum, there's another reason this result is extremely unlikely to be true: sperm are not built out of custom parts. Other parts of the body, for example the inside of the lungs, contain beating filaments which are almost identical (except for length and pattern of motion) to the tails of sperm.

    If wifi caused serious problems with sperm motility, it would also cause very obvious respiratory problems or other issues throughout the body.

  46. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Not sure about this article, but another article I read did say that they had a laptop with WiFi disabled and a second control with no laptop at all and didn't see the drops that they saw on the WiFi laptop.

    My complaint would be that one does not usually store one's sperm directly under the laptop. There's usually some flesh between the laptop and the sperm. Would that flesh be enough to absorb the WiFi radiation? I'm thinking probably since WiFi's penetration is only millimeters. A few millimeters of skin/tissue should protect your sperm.

    Then again, my wife and I are done with having kids (stopping at 2), so perhaps I should look at this as birth control. ;-)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  47. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

    It doesn't say anything about heat, one way or another.

    RTFA. Hell, read the fscking summary: "... compared to healthy sperms stored for the same time in the same temperature away from the computer."

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  48. Re:Great fodder for the pro-lifers by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    It may be tangentially effective. As in: they're in so much pain that they can't get it up...

  49. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    And it's as accurate as the "hottubbing makes you infertile" fake stories from the 80's, 90's,00's and 10's...

    At least in a hottub my nuts are kept at 108-110 degrees for 1-2 hours 3 times a week. far FAR more of a temperature rise for a far longer time than any heat from a laptop can generate.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  50. Stupid by Trevorm7 · · Score: 2

    This is retarded. They could have aimed a corded wi-fi antenna at it, but instead they just put the whole computer next to it and "blamed" the wi-fi.

  51. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Therefore did not test to see if any gasses released from the plastics in the laptop could be the effect. They are testing cells exposed to the environment not inside of it's intended sealed container.

    Lots of variables they did not account for.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  52. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Captain.Abrecan · · Score: 0

    Why is this modded insightful? It is wrong

  53. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Temperature of what? Room? Container? Actual sperm?

    A less than honest person could use room temperature to mask the obvious idea that heat from the laptop was the primary reason. Given they didn't publish the obvious control to prevent this (laptop with wifi turned), consider me suspicious.

  54. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Captain.Abrecan · · Score: 0

    If the radiation from the machine itself was negligible then it means that a test with just the machine would not really matter. There is nothing wrong with the news report.

  55. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    That made me wonder who had to clean off the thermometers, or did they just measure air temp?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  56. More Wifi in the Bible Belt, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we need a whole lot more Wifi in the "red states"! Lots and lots of powerful, tissue-penetrating wifi for all! Maybe on belt-buckles or fanny packs. Maybe sell Wifi crotch warmers. I'm sure some marketing genius can make this happen.

    Maybe you could literally make a rechargeable "Bible belt" product with Wifi. I'm not sure what the belt would do, apart from bathe the crotch with microwave radiation, but I'm sure some holy purpose could be served with networked belts.

  57. Laptop in Name Only by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Laptops are called such simply because you could hold them on your lap.

    I suspect that the number of people who regularly work with them actually sitting in their lap is miniscule given the piss poor ergonomics involved.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Laptop in Name Only by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My point was more that, even if you did hold the laptop in your lap (right over your crotch and not simply on your legs), your sperm will be under skin and tissue. This would afford some protection from the WiFi radiation. (The skin/tissue would absorb the radiation so it might not even reach the sperm.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  58. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Niedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They put the laptop 3CM above the sperm and tried to control the temperature from below and via air conditioning. If I got it right while skimming through it, they also measured sperm temp every 5min using an infrared thermometer.

    However the control was NOT a laptop with the wifi turned off but a setting with no exposure to electrical equipment at all. Which is not a control for WiFi but a control for a "Laptop with Wifi on".
    Which leads me to think that the reason they chose this setup was that they couldn't get a useful result when using a laptop without WiFi as a control. The effect could in theory be caused by any part or combination of parts inside the laptop.

  59. wrong! by arielCo · · Score: 1

    A microwave oven works by passing non-ionizing microwave radiation, usually at a frequency of 2.45 gigahertz (GHz)—a wavelength of 122 millimetres (4.80 in)—through the food. Microwave radiation is between common radio and infrared frequencies. Water, fat, and other substances in the food absorb energy from the microwaves in a process called dielectric heating. Many molecules (such as those of water) are electric dipoles, meaning that they have a partial positive charge at one end and a partial negative charge at the other, and therefore rotate as they try to align themselves with the alternating electric field of the microwaves. Rotating molecules hit other molecules and put them into motion, thus dispersing energy. This energy, when dispersed as molecular vibration in solids and liquids (i.e., as both potential energy and kinetic energy of atoms), is heat.

    (emphasis mine)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven#Principles

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  60. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Ferzerp · · Score: 2

    Yes, yes it does matter. You have just begged the question (by the real meaning).

  61. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by bws111 · · Score: 1

    Entirely possible. But he didn't say 'other variables', he said 'heat', which they did account for.

  62. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it just says they blamed it on non-thermal electromagnetic radiation. It never says they used a control group.
    Grow up, it's not just because said to be scientists say something and that it's written in an article that their method is sound and their conclusions true.
    The lack of scientific methods knowledge in the general population is worrying...

  63. why should i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  64. Niche Market? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    For lead lined pants ... Anyone in ?

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  65. Don't worry baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I got a laptop.

  66. Technology baaad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, who'd of thought all our shiny gadgets were so evil!

    First, an English boffin gets a blistered pecker after getting too personal with his overheating laptop.

    Next, cancer in the brain from using the cellphone too much.

    Now, fry your nuts if you leave your WiFi tablet too close.

    I tell you, there's an evil conspiracy by all the gadgets to get us!! :D

  67. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    Oh, the scientists blamed the damage on non-thermal effects! Gosh, I guess that settles it, then!

    Remember, budding young scientsts, if someone tries to refute your conclusion by pointing to confounding factor X, all you have to do is "blame non-X"! Problem solved! No need for that fancy shmancy "control group" business. Just BLAME something else!

    (Never mind that they didn't test a non-wifi laptop to see if a non-wifi laptop aspect -- like heat -- could have been responsible for these effects...)

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  68. In a word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOOD!

  69. Yeah, right by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I take reports of damage to cells in a dish with a grain of salt. This isn't a natural environment for the cells, and it is incredibly easy to harm them accidentally in a variety of ways. When the phenomenon is unlikely to begin with (damage to cells from photons that individually don't carry enough energy to produce lasting changes in any biological molecule), place your bets on "artifact."

    1. Re:Yeah, right by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      If only there were some way to control for such factors.

    2. Re:Yeah, right by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Controls can be (and are) done, but it's hard to be sure that your controls are adequate, because there are so many variables. As anybody who works with primary cells of any kind will tell you, sometimes they just die and you never figure out why. Basically, cells in a dish want to die; the trick is keeping them alive. Does it matter exactly where you place the experimental and control dishes in your incubator? How gentle you are when you change solutions? How the manufacturer prepared the culture dishes? Could one or the other be contaminated with some kind of microbiological or viral contaminant?

      It's a type of experiment that can be useful, but it tends to be weak evidence. And biological damage from radio waves is a remarkable claim that requires very strong evidence.

  70. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    So, wait one. What you seem to be saying is, if we want to stop nerds from reproducing, all we need to do is pop them in the microwave? Seems a bit of repetitive redundancy, doesn't it? I mean, how many nerds are going to breed, anyway?

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  71. Sperms? by Froggels · · Score: 0

    The plural of sperm is sperm.

    1. Re:Sperms? by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      Thank you, other guy on /. with some grasp of English....

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  72. ye olde fertility joke by catmistake · · Score: 1

    What do you call couples that practice the testicular WiFi-proximity method of birth control?

    parents!

  73. There's an App for that. by Slutticus · · Score: 1

    iPhone in your pocket. No chidrens for you.

  74. But do Half-Life and Half-Life 2 make a full life? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Natural selection
    If you spend too much time on the computer, you're not having a full life.

    But surely you're at least having a half life, because the subject of your comment also happens to be the title of the Half-Life mod whence "How do I shot web?" originated.

  75. As the father of unexpected twin daughters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did nobody bother to tell me about this before?!

  76. Put a kilt on by tepples · · Score: 1

    Back in the 1970s tight underpants and tight jeans used to be the big threat to male fertility.

    So I guess if a man wants to conceive, he should start wearing a kilt, a sarong, a thobe/dishdasha/caftan, or something else that gives more room down there. Yet too many men are too uncertain of their masculinity to wear anything but trousers.

    1. Re:Put a kilt on by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      My boss wears a kilt on special occasions. It looks very hard to sit down in...

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  77. thank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    very goodm thank for sharing
      Angry Birds Online: http://www.angrybirdspc.name
    Dirt Bike Games Online http://www.dirtbikegamesonline.us
    Angry Birds Rio Game http://www.angrybirdsriogame.info

  78. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    No, it means you have damage from "non-thermal radiation" i.e. something other than infrared. Wifi is nicely in the microwave range that has peak absorption by water molecules so it will effectively heat up anything wet. Which sperm (not sperms, editors) are. The researchers didn't do anything to protect the sperm against microwave heating.

  79. Promies, promises... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    I sit with my laptop on my lap WiFi'ing all the time. And I've got three children 4 and under.

    Promises, promises...

    What I'd give for a viable non-surgerical male birth control option.

    1. Re:Promies, promises... by Bucky24 · · Score: 2

      Abstinence?

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    2. Re:Promies, promises... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else posted this earlier. Maybe worth looking in to.

  80. A poorly controlled experiment by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All computers emit RF radiation when they're running, whether or not they even have WiFi installed. Regulations require manufacturers to limit this radiation, but it's still there; and with a computer in very close proximity to a test subject, (spermatozoon, human, or otherwise), it's probably a toss-up as to whether any effects attributable to RF radiation are a result of WiFi, or of the 1GHz+ processor, the switching power supplies, and any of several other possible sources of radio frequency energy.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  81. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by dainbug · · Score: 0

    So agree, this is WIN - WIN! I wish I was moding this week!

  82. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the rage to comment w/o reading and or comprehending.

  83. I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really want male birth control, but I'm not willing to duct tape a laptop around my crotch. Sigh, I'll have my wish in time.

  84. Not me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been using wifi enabled laptops on my lap since they were invented and have had 5 kids since then.

  85. Well sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, if you've got a laptop on your junk when you're actually doing the deed, it tends to get in the way.

  86. Wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes I keep my wireless router on my balls.

  87. Aluminum underwear? by dittbub · · Score: 1

    For being who are paranoid like me, does anyone know of any kind of underwear that will protect my junk from wi-fi radiation?

    1. Re:Aluminum underwear? by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Well AFAIK ten inches (or is it cm?) of lead stops most radiation. You could try that.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  88. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by marcroelofs · · Score: 1

    "Most of them I see are raving frothing at the mouth android owners who cant afford iDevices."

    That's a good way to illustrate OP's point. FWIW, best sold Androids cost as much or more than an iPhone. I't not about the money.

  89. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, your retort is "no u."

    Why is the turtleneck brigade expending so much energy on the OP's comment? Heck, why are they occupying the comments section of this story?

  90. Bias by pentadecagon · · Score: 1

    The researchers here are biased: They certainly are interested in finding such an effect because that would make them famous. So they not only need to prove there is an effect, but that effect must be larger than their bias.

  91. Note to self... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't hang the wireless router from my n*t-sack...

  92. TinFoil Nut Bag anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never mind the tinfoil hat, it's time to don my tinfoil briefs!

  93. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Tharsman · · Score: 1

    Go for it, it's not like syphilis, gonorhea, chlamydia, genital warts, genital herpes and HIV/AIDS are something you should worry about.

    As for your "no sensation" problem... perhaps you need to see a doctor anyways or stop using leather condoms.

  94. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    'Hey hon...no, you won't get knocked up, I've been carrying a wifi in my pants!!!'

    To bad Wifi doesn't seem to be an effective antibiotic or antiviral. Do you know what the test for chlamydia involves? The health care provider sticks a cotton tipped swap about a centimeter up your urethra. A moment you will remember for quite some time.

    Wrap the rascal (or go whole hog, break into your local linear accelerator and fry everything to a crisp).

    (This message brought to you by various governmental and non governmental agencies who are concerned for your health, well being and wallet).

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  95. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

    Go for it, it's not like syphilis, gonorhea, chlamydia, genital warts, genital herpes and HIV/AIDS are something you should worry about.

    A shot will clear up most of those...

    And I'm in an older crowd now...hell, many of them have been married for years, and are just now back on the dating scene...so, best to try to stay with 'clean' chicks...

    Sure, you have to use one the first times or so with her till you get to know her history, and 'check things out' below.....but once done with that...

    Now..if your banging the younger crowd...20's-30's..sure they carry more diseases since the young girls of today seem to be ready to fuck anything with a pulse much more so that the women that age in my day....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  96. Re:Great fodder for the pro-lifers by sexconker · · Score: 0

    It's extremely effective.
    There's even a dedicated group of people in the US and other western countries today that use such methods (organized through the internet, of course) and measure their own sperm counts and report results. Some of the more dedicated actually manually push their testicles back into their abdominal cavity, either over night or just keeping them there 24/7.

  97. Breaking News: by Cameron+Fwoosh · · Score: 2

    Nerds not getting laid leads to them not reproducing.

  98. What is the next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Non-AC'd cars, cell phones, now wireless keyboard...but I'm not worried. What is the next?

  99. Wavelength has nothing to do with it by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I think you are confusing this with the strong interaction of RF wavelengths with the dipole moment of the water molecule, which strongly increases at some frequencies (like in microwave ovens) and, above 30 Mhz, is the model for limits on RF exposure.

    The RF simply generates an electric and magnetic field, with interacts (or not) equally with all matter regardless of size. Down to a point, and I'll let the physicists take over from there.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  100. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

    RTFA. Hell, read the fscking summary: "... compared to healthy sperms stored for the same time in the same temperature away from the computer."

    Except that they method they used to maintain temperature didn't involve a laptop in the control area; they attempted to cool the sample kept near the laptop by an air conditioning system. This would introduce significant vibration, a temperature gradient, and potentially alter CO2 and O2 concentrations near the sperm.

    It's not like running this control would be difficult, so one can only guess why they didn't bother to do it.

    --
    http://www.donarmstrong.com
  101. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Tharsman · · Score: 1

    A shot will clear up most of those...

    Good luck getting a shot for HIV or Herpes.

    And I'm in an older crowd now...hell, many of them have been married for years, and are just now back on the dating scene...so, best to try to stay with 'clean' chicks...

    Sure, you have to use one the first times or so with her till you get to know her history, and 'check things out' below.....but once done with that...

    Your life. Good luck seeing with your eyes that HIV carrier who does not know her husband left her a fun divorce gift, HIV that is still too early to be found on a blood test.

  102. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lack of irony comes from the fact that the protests are anti-banking, not anti-business. Tech companies create value and strive to increase the efficiency of their customers. Banks do not improve efficiency nor create value. They seek market inefficiencies and rather than make things more efficient, they insert themselves into position to extract money from the inefficiency. They benefit from, and thus aim to create, maximal inefficiency. Hence Occupy Wall Street and not Occupy One Infinite Loop.

  103. 2 under 2 by tim_q54 · · Score: 2

    I have been using wi-fi for ~10 years. I have 2 kids under 2yo, they will probably disagree with the findings.

    1. Re:2 under 2 by Slutticus · · Score: 1

      But was it a unidirectional antenna pointed directly at your scrote?

  104. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the frothing at the mouth ones are NOT using the high end devices, it's the tools that get the free crap phone.

  105. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by iblum · · Score: 1

    I guess its just my generation. but I kinda laugh when I think of someone referring to Apple as a "mega giant" or an "evil overlord dominating the market place" since that's how I always thought about microsoft in the microsoft vs apple wars.

  106. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by pclminion · · Score: 1

    Well if a scientist makes a statement it must be right. That's the basis for your argument? "He said so?"

  107. Come on.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I love to be typing away on my computer with my router sitting in between my legs, it just gives me those funny fuzzy warm feelings down there....

  108. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by iblum · · Score: 2

    this whole article makes me wonder where some of our biology research dollars are going. I mean really, c'mon? I know there are people out there struggling with infertility and looking for any scapegoat as to why they can't get pregnant, but most of these ray gun type theories are complete crap. Don't live under power lines, don't sit too close to a tube tv, don't use your phone, don't use your laptop, watch that microwave. Sounds like instead of tin foil hats, they need tin foil underpants.

  109. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by iblum · · Score: 1

    Also you are far more likely to get laid if you already have the girl in a hot tub than if you are still using your laptop to converse with her. so, in attempting to reproduce, the cycle goes, laptop, hot tub, bedroom (unless you are in a porn movie in which case you do her right there in the hot tub.) As some of the geeks here are having trouble processing, before reproduction can, they must have a female partner who is willing to copulate with them. (or semi-willing, or drugged in some way).

  110. laptops and fertility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is well known that heat will cause a lack of fertility. Putting a laptop in the lap is usually quite warm. I doubt one has to look any farther to find a slight decrease in fertility.

  111. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    "Non-thermal electromagnetic radiation" means that electromagnetic radiation caused the effect through a nonthermal mechanism.

    How exactly did they manage that? The frequencies used by WiFi are the same ones your microwave oven uses to cook food. The only way for the WiFi to not heat them up is to not switch it on.

    --
    No sig today...
  112. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they didn't do a control of the laptop with the wifi turned off, then they are idiots not worth listening to about anything. Any competent scientist will want to do proper controls. Especially when they are so damn easy as in this case.

  113. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like how I kinda laugh at you old timers who can't let go of the fact that Apple is a big corporation and still think of them as the 1970s company in a garage. Guess what? They are the biggest technology corporation in the US. Wake up, the "little guy" has now become the "evil overlord" whether you choose to accept it or not. And unlike Microsoft, they were not content with just computers. No your friendly little company now wants to own the music and portable phone market as well. What would they have to do for you to change your dinosaur way of thinking? Publicly sacrifice a baby to Satan? Or could you somehow manage to blame that on Microsoft somehow as well?

  114. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by sjames · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's what they blamed it on, but without a better control so that everything but the WiFi signal is exactly the same as the experimental group, it's hard to say. Somersault is questioning how well the experiment accomplished that.

    In addition to the WiFi signal, laptops emit heat, sound, and various non-WiFi RF. They also off-gas.

  115. Sperm. Outside the body. Near wi-fi. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I want to know all there is to know about their experimental setup.

  116. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like instead of tin foil hats, they need tin foil underpants.

    Beautiful.

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  117. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

    And what would that be, pray tell?

    --
    All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
  118. Induction by Slutticus · · Score: 1

    I thought EEs understood electromagnetic induction.

  119. Yeah baby....its okay... by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

    ...I rubbed them on the router for a while...

  120. Sperms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sperms? Sperms? Don't you mean sperm? Next you will start talking about computer "codes". Perhaps you will see a wheats field when you go on your next roads trip. Get a hairs cut lately? Maybe before I start picking nits for real, you should study "count nouns" and "mass nouns" and then never say 'sperms' again.

  121. Lesson to be learned here boys: by lilla_my · · Score: 1

    Don't stick a laptop in your pants - the research is in, it might be bad for your spunk!

  122. Question by artor3 · · Score: 1

    The summary states "the sperms exposed to Wi-Fi were less capable of moving towards an egg to fertilize it and less capable of passing on the male's DNA if it does fertilize an egg."

    If an egg is fertilized, how can the male's DNA *not* be passed on? If I remember middle school biology, eggs only have one chromosome. Same with sperm. You need two chromosomes to make a person. So if the male's DNA isn't getting passed on, what exactly is going on? Is it going to be a miscarriage or something?

    1. Re:Question by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The only way I can read it is that they claim the wifi makes normally dominant genes behave as a recessive gene.

  123. Heat not WiFi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat is bad for sperm in the testicles that is why you have a scrotum -- to cool them. Could it be that the heat from the laptop sitting right atop your crotch could be the problem and not the WiFi?

  124. Heat not WiFi? by jweller13 · · Score: 1

    Heat is bad for sperm in the testicles that is why you have a scrotum -- to cool them. Could it be that the heat from the laptop sitting right atop your crotch could be the problem and not the WiFi?

  125. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by morgauxo · · Score: 0

    What an imagination you have! As if there are any chicks of any age in your mom's basement! Ha Ha. Well.. I guess sometimes there is one... your mom come down to tell you to get a job...

  126. Alright by snoopyowns · · Score: 0

    Yes, because that is how women get pregnant. Not by intercourse, but the sperm left on laptops...

  127. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how this comment has been modded up and down like a Las Vegas hotel elevator.

    Keep it coming, hipsters, your tears are food for the soul.

  128. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    Better yet, why not just separate the wifi from the laptop. Use a usb wifi adapter or an external wifi antenna. That seems a lot easier than how they did do it.

  129. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >>Here's the kicker - they ran the laptop with the wifi switched off, but only measured the RF output of the laptop in that state. They didn't perform - or performed, but didn't publish - the obvious control experiment.

    Yeah, I noticed that, too.

    Seems very suspicious how they conducted their control.

  130. Tissue barrier by Med-trump · · Score: 1

    Without accounting for the tissue barrier, the study may not reflect real life situation.

  131. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

    If the radiation from the machine itself was negligible then it means that a test with just the machine would not really matter.

    That is only true IF you assume that radiation from the machine is the only possible cause of the sperm damage. However, that's what they are trying to prove, so assuming their desired conclusion when they designed their control is pretty bad experimental design, one that makes the whole thing almost worthless.

  132. Stuck on. . . by jhobbs · · Score: 1

    Of all the problems with this study. . . of all the guys that will worry about their fertility and still have millions of "just fine" sperm. . . of the population argument and the billions of people on earth. . .

    All I can think about is that this study started with some guy rubbing one out in the name of science.

  133. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by discorob3 · · Score: 1

    and they STILL don't have a right click...

  134. This has been known for years... by Epsilon+Moonshade · · Score: 1

    ... as a rumor, at least.

    I worked with high-power RF in the military for 5 years, and it was "common knowledge" that the SHF curse was alive and well. Men who worked with the radios had the "curse" of only having female children when they had kids at all. As such, I'm totally unsurprised at reading this.

  135. And who said its a bad thing? by blackdropbear · · Score: 1

    Considering the cost of alimony/child support it may be welcomed by a lot of men.

  136. Sperm outside the body for 4 hours by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Am I being thick or wouuldn't the sperm have lost their fertility after that long anyway?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  137. Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, well if it's true, then here are some ideas:

    1.) Use your laptop case as a lap-desk.

    2.) Find a place to keep your laptop around the house that doesn't require a "lap", and keep it there like a monitor.

    3.) Don't try to have kids anymore, in case they come out deformed.

    Nick

  138. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Captain.Abrecan · · Score: 0

    My bad, I thought they were trying to prove that the WIFI was dangerous, so it didn't really matter what the rest of the machine was doing if it was small compared to the WIFI. It looks like the WIFI is worse for sperm, compared to sperm without wifi at the same temperature. That is the real newsworthy thing IMHO.

  139. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Seriously...so you're sleeping with a woman, maybe long enough to get in a relationship, and you're always going to wear a condom with her?

    I mean, with most people and some point, even if you don't want to conceive, you DO want skin on skin don't you?

    Otherwise, what's the point?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  140. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by umghhh · · Score: 1
    A story about sperm & computer and no pr0n????? On /. ???? What has world come to....

    Possibly we should take positively - it seems that /.ers do not stay in their cellars no more but have infiltrated scientific community to make experiments with sperms and computer!