Slashdot Mirror


Lightning-made Waves In Earth's Atmosphere Leak Into Space

TheNextCorner sends this quote from NASA: "At any given moment about 2,000 thunderstorms roll over Earth, producing some 50 flashes of lightning every second. Each lightning burst creates electromagnetic waves that begin to circle around Earth, captured between Earth's surface and a boundary about 60 miles up. Some of the waves – if they have just the right wavelength – combine, increasing in strength, to create a repeating atmospheric heartbeat known as Schumann resonance. ... NASA's Vector Electric Field Instrument aboard the U.S. Air Force's Communications/Navigation Outage Forecast System satellite has detected Schumann resonance from space. This comes as a surprise, since current models of Schumann resonance predict these waves should be caged at lower altitude, between the ground and a layer of Earth's atmosphere called the ionosphere."

45 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. this is a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    striking discovery

    1. Re:this is a by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      I think shocking would of been a better word choice.

    2. Re:this is a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      And "would have" would've been a better choice of words for you :)

    3. Re:this is a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *cue sunglasses* yyyeeeeeaaaaaaaa!!!!!

    4. Re:this is a by eugene2k · · Score: 1

      Using some flashy words there, I see...

      --
      Apple has "Mac vs PC", Microsoft has "Laptop Hunters", Linux has recession
    5. Re:this is a by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Naither, actually. It doesn't strike sixty miles up, and if it doesn't strike, no shock.

      Yeah, yeah, woosh, I know...

  2. Schumann ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    was a big proponent of cycles.

    (If 2 people get this, I'll be impressed ; )

    1. Re:Schumann ... by bloody_liberal · · Score: 1

      No need to be so aggressive: http://xkcd.com/541/

    2. Re:Schumann ... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      7.8 Hz bitches.

    3. Re:Schumann ... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  3. Evanescent wave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Is this just picking up an evanescent wave on a really large scale or is the radiation actually getting away from the planet? An evanescent wave is the optical equivalent of tunneling...

  4. but but but by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean atmospheric models aren't perfect predictors of atmospheric phenomena? DENIERS!

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:but but but by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

  5. Leaking energy by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this like other waveguide phenomena, where the first or second-order approximation says the energy vanishes exponentially within a fraction of a wavelength around the waveguide, but if you don't want your radar set (or microwave oven) to explode, you still need to invest heavily in ventilation and/or liquid cooling?

    1. Re:Leaking energy by noelhenson · · Score: 2

      Actually the ionosphere forms both a waveguide and a capacitor with the Earth itself. Changes in potential, even in waveguide scenarios, will still radiate out into space.

  6. Re:Makes no sense by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, it's not so much the wind escaping the chamber, more along the lines of the sound making it out. The only thing "getting out" is electromagnetic waves - and to be honest, I am surprised that the atmosphere actually keeps most of them in. If you think about it, I guess is makes sense, given you can bounce radio signals off the atmosphere to get the signal past the horizon and such - but I was just surprised that electromagnetic waves from lightning get caught inside our atmosphere.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  7. Re:Damn... by swanzilla · · Score: 1

    Damn global warming!!!

    The opposite, by definition.

  8. Class M Planet Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I suppose Schumann resonance occur on similar planets as well, and should be detectable.

    1. Re:Class M Planet Discovery by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I believe there is lightning on Venus, Jupiter and several other bodies in the Solar System so theoretically you could detect it there as well.

    2. Re:Class M Planet Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Electromagnetic pulses from Jupiter can be detected in the Amateur 15 Meter Band, approx 21 Mcs (No damn hertz for me. That's a car rental company. Been banging out CW since I wuz a kid, and I ain't a kid no more.)

    3. Re:Class M Planet Discovery by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Hz was around before the car rental, iinm. And it honors a great man. MCS confused me for a minute, I remember (dimly, I do remember being annoyed that thay changed Cycles Per Second to Hz). I would have caught mCS.

  9. exactly, brilliant by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    how far away is this detectable? this may be how you find other earth-like blue orbs

    until of course, they find the liquid ammonia planet that schumann resonates like nobody's business, populated by little mr. cleans and scrubbing bubbles i suppose

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:exactly, brilliant by BradleyUffner · · Score: 3, Informative

      how far away is this detectable? this may be how you find other earth-like blue orbs

      until of course, they find the liquid ammonia planet that schumann resonates like nobody's business, populated by little mr. cleans and scrubbing bubbles i suppose

      My guess is, that since it's eletromagentic, it follows the inverse-square law.

  10. Re:Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, it's not so much the wind escaping the chamber, more along the lines of the sound making it out. The only thing "getting out" is electromagnetic waves - and to be honest, I am surprised that the atmosphere actually keeps most of them in. If you think about it, I guess is makes sense, given you can bounce radio signals off the atmosphere to get the signal past the horizon and such - but I was just surprised that electromagnetic waves from lightning get caught inside our atmosphere.

    You can hear them on your radio around 2-3mhz.

  11. It leaks, Jim! by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    NASA's Vector Electric Field Instrument aboard the U.S. Air Force's Communications/Navigation Outage Forecast System satellite has detected Schumann resonance from space. This comes as a surprise, since current models of Schumann resonance predict these waves should be caged at lower altitude, between the ground and a layer of Earth's atmosphere called the ionosphere.

    Darn! There goes my plans to build Tesla's wireless power plant.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  12. The frequencies by IceFoot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to Wikipedia, the resonances occur at extremely low frequencies (ELF) around 7.83 (fundamental), 14.3, 20.8, 27.3 and 33.8 Hz. That's Hertz, not megaHertz. Now, how can we tune them in? I, for one, do not own a radio that can receive those frequencies.

    1. Re:The frequencies by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      33.8Hz can be picked up with the human ear. Mad Bass.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:The frequencies by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      To add, 33.8 is a slightly sharp C1. It's about halfway between C1 and C#1 on the musical frequency scale.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:The frequencies by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's about halfway between C1 and C#1 on the musical frequency scale.

      So, it's Java1?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:The frequencies by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and a green laser (532nm, 563THz) would be a slightly flat C44.
      You might say it's too high for the human ear.
      I might answer you can't hear electro-magnetic waves either, even at 440Hz.

    5. Re:The frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, the human ear could pick them all up with enough SPL IF they were pressure waves instead of EM.
      The ear's sensitivity just decreases below ~20Hz, and it requires greater input to register the sound in your head.

      With a couple of 15"s in an EBS configuration it is easy to get enough SPL to hear to ~15Hz in a normal sized room. Ask Tom Danley about 3Hz form his Sonic Boom Generator.

    6. Re:The frequencies by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      http://www.vlf.it/ - all sorts of ways to receive ELF/VLF with a soundcard.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:The frequencies by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Only if you have a reciever tuned to 33.8 Hz with great big speakers (you need a speaker capable of reproducing a tone that low, and few can). You can't hear EMF. ELFs are real, not just in Middle Earth! Most speakers, even the best, don't go down that far.

    8. Re:The frequencies by Khyber · · Score: 2

      We have plenty of software that can allow us to 'hear' things.

      This is how I hunt for exoplanets. I take the Kepler data, input the plotted brightness measurements, assign each area a musical note, and then LISTEN to it.

      Much easier to listen for a pattern like this than to look for it amongst seemingly random noise.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re:The frequencies by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "(you need a speaker capable of reproducing a tone that low, and few can"

      Pretty much every modern headphone and multi-speaker tower out there has a response range with the low end starting ~20Hz.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  13. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The so-called discovered phenomenon is precisely what Tesla was using in the 1890s to transmit power. He also said that he had bounced signals off the moon using the same method. Thunderstorms were exactly the method he used to discover that the electrical standing waves existed around the Earth- his detectors showed that the signals from lightning emitted by storms got quiter as they travelled away, then louder again, as the storm passed along the peak and trough of a wave and thus attenuated the signal in his detector. He used this discovery to calculate how the earth and atmosphere could be used as an immense capacitor and power pumped into it, and could be picked up by an appropriately tuned receiver anywhere on the earth with transmission losses of between 1-5%. At the time it was like voodoo magic- now we know it as simple high voltage/high frequency alternating current. Get the numbers right and its not very hard.

  14. No it can't by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 5, Informative

    It can't pick up these waves, because the human ear picks up sound, not magnetic waves. There are some bones in your sinuses that are magnetoceptic, but studies have yet to get detailed. It's such a rudimentary sense that you are barely able to pick up the magnetic north with it, so it's highly questionable that you'd be able to pick up rapidly alternating differences in magnetic fields.

    It is however proven that these magnetoceptic bones are a real human sense. So yes, there's at least a sixth sense there. Oh, for that matter, totally off topic, your balance sense (inner ear) also counts, so make that a seventh, or an eighth, if you count the receptors for pheromones in your nasal cavity as well (debatable, since it's a form of smell, just not consciously perceived).

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:No it can't by tsa · · Score: 1

      But maybe they are more sensitive to changing magntic fields than to stationary fields.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:No it can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is well over 10 distinctly separate senses in humans.

      There is also the odd cases, such as human echolocation, which shows that it may well have been common in the ancestors we shared with dolphins.

      Then there is the hypersensitive types, such as those supertasters. (not so much separate sense though)

      Then there is the completely weird ones, such as the ability to see polarized light (I can), Haidinger's Brush I think is how it is spelled.
      With the brush, it is believed that most people are actually capable of detecting it with some training on how to see it.
      I have to link to some stuff on seeing Haidinger's brush, it always fascinates when people finally see it.
      Oh, and Tetrachromats who have distinctly separate 4th color detection around the yellow colors I think. (only females though)
      Makes me wonder how they would see those RGBY screens that were made recently.

    3. Re:No it can't by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your ears may not be able to detect these, but your computer's soundcard can. It can also detect all sorts of other ELF transmissions. Check out http://www.vlf.it/ - fascinating stuff!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:No it can't by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "It's such a rudimentary sense that you are barely able to pick up the magnetic north with it"

      Actually, I have no issues doing that totally blindfolded. I have a very strong innate sense of direction, even with the disadvantage of suffering from BPPV.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  15. freqs by sumdumbskibum · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia is wrong due in part to our fundamental misunderstandings of em. The waves of energy reffered to are called bi-longitudinal em waves. The freq discussed here are not in the hertzian freq range, but much lower. More in the 6 - 8 cycles range, similar to where are brains neurochemistry operates. Nicola Tesla has been the most accurate in his observation of this phenomenon while in colorado springs, in fact his power transmission tower used resonance to generate a larger wave period while his em waves circled the globe. The reason for the escape from our atmosphere comes down to electron pair production/ annialation process. HAARP technology would be a good place to start to be able to recreate/observe/measure this phenomenon better. Even though they clearly state that those freq ranges cannot be reproduced by their machine, go to another country that has this technology and im sure you will find the representation of said idea in its infancy/entirety depending on the country and direction they took the technology

    1. Re:freqs by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The freq discussed here are not in the hertzian freq range, but much lower. More in the 6 - 8 cycles range

      Hz = cps. 6-8 cycles = 6-8 Hz.

  16. Exoplanet detection? by WDancer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this could possibly be used for exoplanet detection. It sounds like it may have a distinctive radio signal. Any radio astronomers want to reply?