Slashdot Mirror


Crowdsourced List of SOPA Supporters

Fraser Cain writes "GoDaddy listened to reason, and reversed their position on SOPA. Here's a crowdsourced list of every other company supporting SOPA with web address, Twitter feed, contact emails and phone numbers. Perhaps they should be contacted to find out if they still fully support SOPA, or have changed their mind."

52 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Google Docs? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can someone please post a link that is accessible to everyone, not just Google users?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Google Docs? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The document is public, no sign-in required. Or that's what Google says at least.

      If that's the case, they are lying. All I get is a sign in page.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Google Docs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just copied the names, because the contact information is being updated, but for what it's worth here:

      http://piratenpad.de/c3ADz3hTxY

    3. Re:Google Docs? by Spad · · Score: 5, Informative

      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmGJz_37ojoqdFZhYlBhN2hQOGRoN2R0ZGh3VDZlblE&pli=1#gid=0

      Whoever posted the article did so with the login as part of the link,

    4. Re:Google Docs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AmGJz_37ojoqdFZhYlBhN2hQOGRoN2R0ZGh3VDZlblE&output=html

      This should be a truly public version of the sheet, read-only though.

    5. Re:Google Docs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoever posted the article did so with the login as part of the link

      Just shows that timothy doesn't open any article submitted.

      BTW the link submitted by AC at the same time is better - it's html - the google docs link pops up error messages (seriously, Google, 2011???) when I open it.

      Html link:

      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AmGJz_37ojoqdFZhYlBhN2hQOGRoN2R0ZGh3VDZlblE&output=html.

  2. Listened to reason? by blowdart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reason? Caved into public humiliation more like. Reason had nothing to do with it, bad publicity, losing customers and losing money was what caused it - and remember GoDaddy had a clause where SOPA wouldn't apply to them anyway.

    1. Re:Listened to reason? by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

      If this passes, I could shut down Makezine. They lifted some of my photos and included them in one of their on-line issues. How many times have you blogged about something and lifted a photo? This is a copyright violation just the same as if you shared a recent film.

      No complaints on Makezine though. I would have given permission if they asked. They didn't ask, so they don't have permission. I'm picking on them for example only.

      This is how dangerous this law is. I could shut down Makezine for copyright violations if this passes as I am the copyright owner of some images posted there.
      http://makezine.com/

      If this passes, they need to be very careful about what they post that is submitted by users.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  3. Re:why footwear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because they want to shut down every online shop that sells cheap footwear falsely claiming it to be Nike? Actually, forget the second part - just shut down any online shop that sells cheap footwear without due process.

  4. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    LOL, this fool thinks this is all about pirated music.
    Clearly you don't realize that supporting this bill is akin to supporting terrorism, child rape, and the murdering of baby seals. For shame!

  5. GoDaddy Still Supports SOPA by classzero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GoDaddy didn't reverse their position at all. They are still in support of SOPA. Here is the CEO refusing to come out against the bill:
    http://gizmodo.com/5870920/brave-godaddy-ceo-says-hes-neither-for-nor-against-sopa

    1. Re:GoDaddy Still Supports SOPA by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

      100% right. And we can get a good guess where their policy is coming from when we see that Christine Jones has this on her Blog, undersigned in her role as general counsel and corporate secretary of GoDaddy.com

      The debate about the contents of this bill, and its companion bill in the Senate, the PROTECT IP Act, has been heated in recent weeks, as companies within the Internet ecosystem have rallied to lobby against the passage of legislation which might hold us accountable.

      That myopic view has never been shared by Go Daddy.

      The boycott of Go Daddy should not stop until at least Christine has been fired.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:GoDaddy Still Supports SOPA by Alsee · · Score: 3, Informative

      WIKIPEDIA BOYCOTTS GODADDY,
      LOBBYING AGAINST SOPA,
      PLANS ONLINE PROTEST POTENTIALLY INCLUDING PARTIAL BLACKOUT

      Jimbo Wales:
      I am proud to announce that the Wikipedia domain names will move away from GoDaddy.

      Current protest proposal:
      * Triggering event: When SOPA has passed committee and is scheduled for a floor vote in either the House or Senate. The banner runs for the week before the vote, and switches to the blackout on the day before.
              * Scope: Response is geotargeted to United States IP addresses only
              * Duration: Maximum of 7 days for banner component, maximum of 24 hours for blackout component. Blackout is triggered on the business day before the vote. If the vote is on a Monday, blackout runs for 24 hours starting Friday.
              * Action (banner): Banners encourage people to contact their Senators and Representatives (priority given to whichever is urgent, House or Senate).
                          o To the maximum extent possible, readers are given instant information on how they can take action. Campaign is designed to mobilize the public maximally.
                          o The focus is on generating high-value congressional contacts (phone calls and in-person contacts vs letters or emails)
                          o A VOIP-based callback system (such as the one used recently by tumblr) is an option if we can find one that fits our needs and allows us to remain acceptably independent.
                          o Banners operate like the fundraising banners (served via CentralNotice, can be closed per-user, etc).
              * Action (blackout): All requests are answered with a black page. The page is semi-protected Wikitext. Once the page is displayed, a cookie is set which prevents its display again. Exact wording to be decided, but it hits the following points:
                          o SOPA puts Wikipedia, and the rest of the free Internet, at risk
                          o You can help by contacting your representative and senators (with maximally easy help with ways to do that)
                          o A "Learn more about SOPA" link which points to the relevant article on the English Wikipedia
                          o A "Why am I seeing this" link which points to a page detailing the process for reaching this consensus
                          o A link to click through to the originally requested page
                          o "You will only see this page once"

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. LVMH by alen · · Score: 2, Funny

    no $1000 handbag for my wife now.

  7. GoDaddy did *not* reverse position by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Informative

    They said they will simply take a less forward stance (less openly pro-SOPA). They definitely did not change course.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  8. crowdsourced by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Perhaps they should be contacted to find out if they still fully support SOPA, or have changed their mind."
     
    ...or ever supported it to begin with. Anyone on the planet can add a company to this list with no confirmation that it's true. And there's nothing to prevent anyone from deleting companies. Sounds like a great mechanism to slander or harass innocent companies, and one that's oh-so-easy to sabotage by someone who supports SOPA. Good luck with this.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:crowdsourced by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting. If it's "slander" to say Company X supports SOPA, then it must be a very heinous bill indeed.

      I get your point: That there's no proof of fact-checking, and I can't find a single person among my associates, friends or family that doesn't detest SOPA; However, a company's name mistakingly placed on a list of entities for or against any bill shouldn't equate to slander. If being associated with the bill in any way is cause for libel, then who could ever support or create it in the first place?

      Although I'm not aware of any individuals who are for SOPA, I don't doubt their existence. Would not being incorrectly placed on the list of SOPA supporters have a positive effect in this regard? Are you not also assuming a false dichotomy, of those who are for and those against SOPA?

      What of those, like me, who realize they are too disenfranchised to give a damn either way? I'm against SOPA and other such bills that rob us of personal rights, but you must realize that government and corporations by and large wants this to pass. This SOPA or a bill like it WILL pass eventually. The sooner the better.

      Not until the common people feel the jack-boot of oppression at their own throats will they have the resolve to rally in opposition to this and other such corruptions of power.

      (Undoing a mod to post this)

    2. Re:crowdsourced by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone on the planet can add a company to this list with no confirmation that it's true. And there's nothing to prevent anyone from deleting companies. Sounds like a great mechanism to slander or harass innocent companies, and one that's oh-so-easy to sabotage by someone who supports SOPA. Good luck with this.

      Amusingly enough, that is how SOPA is designed to work.

    3. Re:crowdsourced by tverbeek · · Score: 2

      "Slander is when you say something you know is not true. "

      Under US law it's an untrue statement that's either known to be false, or made with reckless disregard for the truth. If I inserted Geeknet into the list in an effort to cost them business that's a known falsehood. Publishing the list with their name but without confirming it is (arguably) reckless disregard for the truth. Either would be slander.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:crowdsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not until the common people feel the jack-boot of oppression at their own throats will they have the resolve to rally in opposition to this and other such corruptions of power.

      You've obviously never lived in South America or Africa, or in the Germany of the 1930s and 1940s. Sure there is the Arab Spring and the Resistance, but asking people to be tortured and killed to prove a point I think is a bit much. Maybe we should try to stop the Bullshit before it goes to far instead of just letting it happen, which is what the moderates did in Germany: appeasement and pandering to the Right Wing of the Nazi movement and the corporations that financially supported and encouraged the Nazis.

      In many places, but especially America, people are all too eager to credit their successes to personal virtue and hard work, and their failures onto other people (foreigners, socialists, black people, poor people...). Yes its true, people don't care until something bad happens to themselves, but the point is that if the "common people" or the "moderates" let things get that bad in the first place, then they have already lost.

      (BTW, whoever modded my earlier post "Troll" should get a sense of humor! There is a big difference between satire and Flamebait!)

    5. Re:crowdsourced by FSWKU · · Score: 2

      Actually, it wouldn't be slander at all. That line in Spider Man from Jonah Jameson was actually spot on. "Slander is spoken! In print, it's libel!" It's all defamation, but they're still two legally distinct offenses.

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  9. Sucks to be an american by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Hopefully this wont get /. a take down notice!)
    Sung to the tune of Lee Greenwood's "Proud to be an American"

    "Sucks to be an American"

    [Verse]
    If tomorrow all my posts were gone I'd created all my life,
    And I had to start again under a lawsuit filled with strife.
    I'd curse my karma to be living here today,
    'Cause congress sold the flag of freedom
    And the corporations took it away.

    [Chorus]
    It sucks to be an American
    Where we have Fox News on TV
    My girl can't sing a cover of Brittney Spears
    Because SOPA's censored she,
    They issued a take down, and sued my family
    For 15 million bucks,
    Cause there ain't no doubt congress sold this land,
    And SOPAs just one way.

    [Verse]
    From the Sony lakes of Minnesota, to the Disney hills of Tennessee
    Across the plais of RCA Texas, from company to company.
    From multinational owned Detroit and Houston and L.A,

    There's fear in every American heart
    And it's time we stand and say:

    [Chorus]
    It sucks to be an American
    Where we have Fox News on TV
    My girl can't sing a cover of Brittney Spears
    Because SOPA's censored she,
    They issued a take down, and sued my family
    For 15 million bucks,
    Cause there ain't no doubt congress sold this land,
    And SOPAs just one way.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Sucks to be an american by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2

      (Hopefully this wont get /. a take down notice!)

      They will, eventually.

      It sucks to be an American

      Don't worry; once this abortion of a bill passes in the States, America Junior (Canada) will implement their own version, with the EU to follow closely behind.

      --
      Yeah, right.
  10. Autodesk by pieisgood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Considering Autodesk actually stands to gain a little by allowing individual pirates to use their software (ie hobbyists who cant afford outrageous fees) , I am surprised to see them on this list. I would also be surprised to see adobe on here, but gladly they are not.

    Large communities surround 3D studio max, Maya, and Mudbox. The likelihood they paid for the software is minimal, and the likelihood they make content that generates revenue is even smaller. But! They also become the back bone to an industry of artists who DO create revenue generating content. Allowing younger individuals to use this software builds, how ever silly, alliances to that software and in turn probable profit for Autodesk down the line.

    I would like to hear arguments against this position though.

    Thoughts?

    --
    Eat sleep die
    1. Re:Autodesk by pieisgood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, Monster cables is on this list. Which is HILARIOUS... considering they ARE the crooks. Fucking amazing.

      --
      Eat sleep die
  11. Wait?? by eclectro · · Score: 2, Informative

    What exactly does the Fraternal Order of Police stand to gain from passage of SOPA exactly??

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Wait?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What exactly does the Fraternal Order of Police stand to gain from passage of SOPA exactly??

      Instant removal of sites hosting videos and pictures of police brutality or improper conduct?

  12. Christians are in Favour of SOPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lets not believe all the hype. GoDaddy has decided, for business reasons, that it is no longer publicly supporting SOPA. GoDaddy is NOT publicly saying that they are against SOPA.

    From the GoDaddy Website (and with the assistance of their lawyers and public relations team):

    In changing its position, Go Daddy remains steadfast in its promise to support security and stability of the Internet. In an effort to eliminate any confusion about its reversal on SOPA though, Jones has removed blog postings that had outlined areas of the bill Go Daddy did support.

    "Go Daddy has always fought to preserve the intellectual property rights of third parties, and will continue to do so in the future," Jones said.

    Doesn't sound like much of a retreat to me, especially when they say (in regards to SOPA and the DMCA, that "... and we will continue to do so in the future.".

    Also, something interesting, if you look at the official list of SOPA supporters, it is filled with a lot of Christian organizations (they either have the word Christian in their name, or they are Christian conservative in their lifestyles and political beliefs), like this group:
    Concerned Women for America, whose mandate is:

    We are the nation's largest public policy women's organization with a rich 28-year history of helping our members across the country bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy. We help people focus on six core issues, which we have determined need Biblical principles most and where we can have the greatest impact.

    Not that I am trying to Troll or make this into a religious controversy, but I do find it curious that along with the usual suspects like the big media conglomerates, that there would be so many Christian organizations interested in stopping the sale of counterfeit Rolex watches. Though I think we all know that when governments and corporations band together to promote a police state for our own protection, things aren't always as they appear.

    And speaking of corporations, why am I forced to create a Google account just so that I can RTFA?!

    References:
    https://www.godaddy.com/newscenter/release-view.aspx?news_item_id=378&isc=smtwsup
    http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/Rouge%20Websites/SOPA%20Supporters.pdf

    1. Re:Christians are in Favour of SOPA by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      Fundamentalists will love this. Goodby pornhub, redtube, pichunter, and so on... They want to send porn back to DVDs and dirty magazines.

    2. Re:Christians are in Favour of SOPA by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone looking to contact the religious organizations might want to point out that intellectual property did not exist when "thou shalt not steal" was written in stone. Furthermore, a lot has been lost in translation, but it is widely recognized that individual property rights were not the same as they are today and that "stealing" refers to the monopolization of resources that were needed by the group of people as a whole and perceived to be common property. Ie. "thou shalt not claim ownership of the only source of drinkable water in the area and deny it to others'. Viewed from this more accurate interpretation of "thou shalt not steal", intellectual property is "stealing". It is taking something previously thought to be common property and claiming it as your own and using that to exploit other members of the tribe or other tribes.

  13. Re:Gaming. by TrueSatan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft is a SOPA supporter by proxy in that it is a member of the pro SOPA Business Software Alliance. By doing their dirty work this way some other companies may also be attempting to escape being named and shamed as SOPA supporters. Note...Kapersky terminated their BSA membership over the SOPA issue. Wikipedia is kind enough to list the BSA members for us so perhaps this list (excluding Kapersky) should be added to this campaign? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Software_Alliance

  14. Re:I'm not by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

    students aren't going to drop three grand for software

    No but schools will drop hundreds of thousands of dollars on site licenses. What do you think a typical college pays for a site license for Autocad or Matlab? These companies would rather see students learning how to use their software in a trade school.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  15. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Moryath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LOL, this fool thinks this is all about pirated music.

    Sadly, that's what the MafiAA is trying to convince the majority of the public of.

    And that's what the fucking fools in Congress who said things like "We don't need to bring in a bunch of nerds to explain this bill to us" believe too. Well that and they believe in continuing to get MafiAA bribery money^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H"campaign donations."

  16. Re:Xerox by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, most color photocopiers (and some printers) detect efforts to copy US currency and refuse. I don't think it's a government mandate, just all copier manufacturers realising that if they didn't do it voluntarily, it'd be mandated sooner or later. Given that very few people have a legitimate reason for copying money (The only one I can think of would be as props in photos or performances), it mostly goes unnoticed.

  17. Re:Who gives a fuck? by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it unproductive that certain members of congress openly state, "Businesses can and should regulate themselves," and then support SOPA which ignores Constitutional law.

    "Enemy of my enemy is my friend." - Ancient proverb

  18. Re:Gaming. by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2

    Not just SCE.

    Sony Electronics Inc.
    Sony Music Entertainment
    Sony Music Nashville
    Sony Pictures Entertainment
    Sony/ATV Music Publishing

  19. Ford should not be on that list ... by JimCanuck · · Score: 2

    https://twitter.com/#!/Ford/

    We haven't specifically supported the proposed bill. We believe IP protection is crucial & believe in Internet freedom ^SM

    Excuse us, but we never specifically said anything about that particular bill. (con't)^SM

    We believe IP protection is crucial and will work with Congress to balance innovation & Internet freedom. ^SM

    No official position; we support legislation that protects IP but want innovation to flourish (i.e. Internet freedom) ^SM

  20. Re:I'm not by bmo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >Hell, their idea of a "cheap" product is AutoCAD LT which is still $500.

    And LT is a 2D cad.

    You want CAD that will read .dwg files?

    Dassault's Draftsight. It's free. It's also cross platform - Windows, Macintosh, and Linux.

    --
    BMO

  21. Re:Who gives a fuck? by koan · · Score: 2

    According tot he law it isn't "theft" it's copyright violation, now back under your bridge troll...

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  22. Evidence? by qtp · · Score: 2

    While I think that this list is a worthwhile effort, there should be some evidentiary requirement for an entity to be listed.

    Public commentary, news releases, statements in interviews, response to inquiry, etc. are verifiable and not difficult to find or obtain.

    It is possible that some have been listed erroneously, by either good or ill intentioned persons.

    Without some method of including evidence the usefulness and value of this list is questionable.

    --
    Read, L
  23. Re:Xerox by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    Actually, in most cases it is the driver. Printers do not have enough horsepower to check every image that way.

  24. Re:why footwear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its not just copyright infringement. Sites that try to bypass the usual import routes will also be targeted.
    In the UK we commonly pay 50-200% more than people in the US for goods. Some places like Australia
    are even worse. Every now and then someone tries to get around this by importing it themselves. This
    happens frequently with wheelchairs that are often twice the price just because there is no alternative source.

    It wont just be counterfeit goods, anyone who doesn't use the proper distribution channels will be hit too.

  25. Re:STOP SOCIALISM AND SUPPORT SOPA! by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Funny

    But Jesus was a pirate. He copied that fish and bread. When you ask yourself what Jesus would do, the answer is clearly 'pirate it and share with others.'

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  26. Re:I'm not by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2

    I would throw in DoubleCAD as well. I use it constantly at work and it's really quite good. It isn't on Mac or Linux though. I'll have to check out Draftsight though!

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  27. Re:why footwear? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Caterpillar is on the list too. They must have trouble with people pirating their backhoes and bulldozers. That must take a shit-ton of 3D printer feed...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  28. Wanted: List of companies AGAINST SOPA by DodgeRules · · Score: 2

    While this list is a good start to see which companies to avoid doing business with, I would like to see a list of companies that are vocal about being against SOPA so that I can direct my spending dollars towards them. If a lot of people shifted their spending dollars towards those companies against SOPA, maybe the loss of income may change the pro-SOPA mentality.

  29. Re:Who gives a fuck? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Makes perfect sense. Businesses, who as we all know are the epitome of ethics, can be trusted to do the Right Thing(tm). Whereas Joe Q. Public is only one step away from smoking pot, kissing a member of his own sex, downloading Britney Spears and buying a fake Rolex, and needs to be held in line with threats, teargas and the promise of an eternity in hell for his sins.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  30. Re:why footwear? by icebike · · Score: 2

    google (tm) "harley davidson t-shirts" and see after the first few pages its all rip-offs.

    Wow. Bike sales must be tanking if their tee-shirt spin off makes them willing to throw the internet under the bus just for a tee shirt royalty.

    Do these people not understand that free advertising is worth WAY more than they earn from tee shirt sales?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  31. GoDaddy continues supporting SOPA by Weezul · · Score: 4, Informative

    GoDaddy has NOT withdrawn its official congressional support for SOPA

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  32. GoDaddy continues supporting SOPA by Weezul · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  33. Re:Who gives a fuck? by aurizon · · Score: 2

    With apologies to Pastor Martin Niemöller's famous poem, First they came..., his cry of protest against those Germans who did nothing to stop the Nazi rise to power, and who stood by as the Nazis purged group after group of "undesirables" in their country.
    http://webweaversworld.blogspot.com/2006/10/first-they-came-for-jews-variations-on.html

    When SOPA came for the ISPs,
    I remained silent;
    after all I was not an ISP.

    When SOPA locked up the all the routers,
    I remained silent;
    after all I did not have a router.

    When they came for the movie uploaders,
    I did not speak out;
    after all I was not an uploader.

    When they came for me,
    there was no one left to speak out.