Slashdot Mirror


Rackspace: SOPA "Is a Deeply Flawed Piece of Legislation"

hypnosec writes "Cloud-based hosting service provider Rackspace has joined the ever expanding list of companies that are opposed to the U.S. Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). In a blog post, Rackspace CEO Lanham Napier said that the controversial bill, which will get its final vote before the House Judiciary Committee, will do more harm than good, punishing innocent users in the process. 'The SOPA bill, as it stands, is a deeply flawed piece of legislation. It is bad for anyone who uses the Internet, including Rackspace, the more than 160,000 business customers that we serve, and the tens of millions of retail customers that they serve. It is bad for job creation and innovation,' Napier wrote."

21 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Nearly all laws are by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most all laws over the last few decades have been deeply flawed in some way. That's what you get when you elect idiots.

    1. Re:Nearly all laws are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or rather, that's what you get when your politicians can make promises of intent without any fear of being held accountable once elected.

    2. Re:Nearly all laws are by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell me about it! My Congressman is Spencer Bachus, one of the biggest crooks and liars in Washington. We're probably going to vote him out next year, but whoever replaces him will probably be just as bad.

      I say "probably" because we have a lot of idiot voters, too.

    3. Re:Nearly all laws are by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh they're not idiots.

      They're very smart.

      It's just that they have different goals to what you would like.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:Nearly all laws are by deblau · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's what happens when Congress is in the pocket of big business. Any good business person will tell you that you need recurring revenue. Congress does it through sunset provisions: "Oh, that law you really like is expiring soon? Well, maybe I can get an extension passed, but it'll cost lots of money to advance that ahead of extensions that other people want." It's really a racket.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    5. Re:Nearly all laws are by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's what you get when you elect idiots.

      Who is the greater idiot: the idiots or the idiots who vote for them?

      Let's not for a moment pretend we have anyone other than ourselves to blame. Everyone says they hate SOPA, but talk about voting against the SOPA parties and suddenly you're a wacko and 90+% people start listing reasons they plan to support the people who enact it.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  2. Ugh by rwven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most hilariously annoying part of this bill is that there's not a single sane citizen of this country who, when properly educated on the bill's impact, would vote for such a thing....yet the lunatics running this country will probably pass it right on through since they're in the chokehold of the industries and power mongers which DO want it.

    If it's possible to lose any more faith in the people at the top, I certainly will if this is passed. I'll also cast opposing votes against any representatives who vote for it, regardless of party affiliation.

    1. Re:Ugh by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll also cast opposing votes against any representatives who vote for it, regardless of party affiliation.

      Since both of the big parties are owned by the same people, I assume that you will only vote 3rd party from now on?

      Voting D or R is throwing your vote away. The only valid way to vote is to vote for a 3rd party candidate. Or an "extremist" D or R... The only R I would currently consider voting for is Ron Paul and the only D I would consider voting for, if he runs for anything, is Feingold.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Ugh by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The problem is that, for a variety of reasons, American presidential candidates are obligated to be Christian and are kinda stuck pandering to religious morons - The clout of the shadowy Family and attendance of their National Prayer Breakfast is a good example.

      Many of us believe in a god, or (like me) are outwardly atheist, but many of us who don't believe in a god claim a religion or denomination for reasons of family history(and, more specifically, the risk of being ostracized or written out of the lucrative will for angering the more traditional elders).

      Ethanol-fueled, where is this rant going?

      Religious people want censorship. The internet's free flow of information is anathema to their shackled minds and irrational fear of truth.

    3. Re:Ugh by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Informative

      One of them is the "We the People Act": http://www.independentamericanparty.org/2011/09/1949/ That is strait from the horses mouth.

      See section 3. It boils down to forbidding the US supreme court from hearing cases on the constitutionality of state laws based on religion, abortion or sexual orientation discrimination. If it were in effect, each state could ban abortion in violation of roe vs wade or make homosexuality a felony. States could ban atheists, muslims, jews, mormons, catholics or even protestants from serving in public office without federal challenge among many many other backwards theocratic and anti-constitutional edicts.

      I believe he has at least one other proposed law with similar effects.

    4. Re:Ugh by element-o.p. · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Religious people want censorship. The internet's free flow of information is anathema to their shackled minds and irrational fear of truth.

      Stereotype much? Yes, there are "religious" people who do -- and have done -- some pretty crappy things throughout history. There are "religious nutcases" who are certainly the "shackled minds" that you mention above. There are also those who claim religious affiliation (for more than purposes of securing a position in a will) who don't fit that mold -- those who are vocal Libertarians, who love science and technology and who abhor censorship. I am one. So are a number of my friends. Kindly refrain from confusing us with those who truly are as bad as you claim, 'kay? Thanks.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  3. Doesn't matter, the fix is in by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obama and most of the Democratic Party are owned by the big Hollywood studios. The Republican Party is owned by big business in general. The only reason this hasn't passed already (without even a public debate) is that Google and a handful of other big players are fighting it. But even Google is a relatively small fish in this money game.

    As for those of us without deep pockets--well save yourself that stamp on a letter to your Congressman.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Doesn't matter, the fix is in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But even Google is a relatively small fish in this money game.

      Actually, Larry and Sergei could buy all of the movie and music studios with their personal money. I'm not even saying Google could buy them (which obviously, it could), but I'm saying Larry and Sergei could.

      The entertainment industry is actually not that big, in terms of economic impact. They just have a huge soap box by virtue of what they do, so it appears they are bigger than they are.

  4. Corporate support is crumbling by cultiv8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Interesting paragraph in this article from politico:

    “The dynamic is clear. Once SOPA — and its Senate counterpart, Protecting IP Act, or PIPA — became high-profile among the Internet community, the lazy endorsements from companies and various hangers-on became toxic. And now, those supporters are scrambling, hollowing out the actual support for the bill. Suddenly, a bill with ‘widespread’ corporate support doesn’t have much support at all,” Dayden said.

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
  5. What Would Happen... by IonOtter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Serious question for consideration:

    What would happen if the "big players", such as Level 3, Verizon, Google and the like came out and said, "If you pass this legislation, we are turning off all of our equipment. We will back up our servers, send our customers their data, rip out the equipment, sell it for scrap, leave the wires hanging, sell our buildings and retire to the Caribbean. If you pass this, we won't be able to do our jobs, so we will simply quit and leave you with nothing to legislate. Good luck suing us, because you'll be back to typewriters, pens and wired telephones."

    Totally NOT going to happen, but as an exercise in thought, would it be possible?

    Could a company as big and powerful as Google hold the world hostage with nothing more than a power switch?

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:What Would Happen... by itchythebear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interesting thought, but as has been pointed out before, they don't actually care what happens to the internet. The Govt will fund a Govt only network (if they need it) and big media will finally not have to worry about people illegally downloading their "product" and can go back to charging 20 bucks for a CD and forcing television down everyone's throats.

      Yet more proof of how little our representatives care about us eh?

      --
      If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    2. Re:What Would Happen... by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Well, since we're playing what if... In Google's case they wouldn't actually need to throw the switch, just have a search equivalent of the Black Out day Jimmy Wales proposed for Wikipedia. Let's say you are coming from a US based IP address. You go to Google and enter a search, but get... No results, just some ads down the side of the screen and a message saying something to the effect of:

      If enacted, SOPA and PIPA could be used to force us not to display links that might infringe copyright or face criminal sanctions. Since we can't determine that automatically, here's what is safe for us to display.

      Click here for what non-US based netizens (i.e. your competitors) would see via our non-US based "affiliates", or here for more info on these two acts currently under consideration.

      Needless to say, clicking the link would return the normal links, and second set of ads providing move revenue for Google, so there's an incentive there and the resultant uproar would be... entertaining.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:What Would Happen... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, the government and the studios don't care, but the public does. If the internet is shut down, Americans can't get their porn. And if Americans can't get their porn, they'll bring out their guns.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  6. Something not mentioned.... by dcigary · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Rackspace is a large constituent of Lamar Smith's District 21 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Texas.21st.Congressional.District.gif) as they are headquartered in San Antonio, Texas. Having this large of an employer in his own district against the legislation should be a big wake-up call to Rep. Smith.

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  7. Re:and yet it will probably pass by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know. We said the same thing about the AT&T buyout of T-Mobile. We all knew it was bad for competition. We all knew AT&T was lying to the government about it. And even when the truth leaked out, AT&T and various government people continued to push for it. It looked really bad. But there was LOTS of talk. It became very high profile. The added light and notice the issue got eventually killed the deal.

    People need to continue shouting from the rooftops about SOPA.

    One thing I have yet to see talked about is how laws like DMCA and the proposed SOPA continue to increasingly put police and government powers in the hands of non-government people... people who aren't otherwise accountable for their actions. It's a huge violation of government trust.

  8. Re:Flawed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Flawed? No, shit!

    Fixed that for you.