Slashdot Mirror
Running Great Britain? There's an App For That!
judgecorp writes "Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron will get a personalised iPad app to help him run the country. The 'government dashboard' will include health waiting list figures, crime statistics, economic statistics and a real-time news feed. Cameron is a committed Apple user — but British members of Parliament have only been allowed iPads in the House of Commons since March 2011."
Angry Birds will be running the country.
as "Ruining Great Britain"?
Hacking into those feeds sounds like a lot of fun indeed!
Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
Stop making apps for the sake of making an app. If the solution doesn't require any specific equipment on the device, just write make it a website.
"Cabinet Office developers are currently building the customised iPad app so the Prime Minister can remain abreast of government business . . . is expected to be ready by March."
I'd love to work for the government contractor that got that contract. As if the MPs expenses scandal wasn't bad enough, now we're bankrolling the Prime Minister's iTunes account.
"The app will essentially act as a government dashboard, providing the Prime Minister with all the latest information from across Whitehall – including the latest NHS waiting-list figures, crime statistics, unemployment numbers, and a wide variety of other data – at a glance."
I just hope that we, the taxpayers who are paying for this development work, will get a version of the app that we can use ourselves. It's fine if they scrub out the sensitive internal government data that it's (hopefully) tracking, but a sanitised version appropriate for public consumption would still be quite useful. I'd be interested to know things like crime and unemployment statistics, which can then be used to judge how well the Conservative government is actually doing.
Looks like "Dave" has a new tool to replace the old one (Nick Clegg)
Presumably you also criticized GWB, who literally took 3 times as many vacation days as Obama, right?
Don't worry, Dave needs Clegg. It's not as if he managed to push through a Bill which fixes parliaments at 5 years and requires a majority of 2/3 to call an early election. Combine this with New Labour's Abolition of Justice 2003 and Castration of Parliament 2006 acts and I begin to wonder why Westminster hasn't been turned into luxury flats. 99 in every 100 pieces of legislation are already written by government with only a few dozen Acts per year actually resulting from Bills passed through Parliament. The people of England and Wales are too busy worrying about manufactured crises while one of the most stable democracies in the world self-terminates.
Oh well, we're getting what we deserve. It's not as if we've suffered a suffrage-abolishing enabling act yet - the Fixed Term Act merely gave the Tories the maximum allowed by the 1911 Parliament Act without Lords veto privilege.
Dev accounts can load apps directly onto factory standard iOS devices - it'd be a bitch to chase down bugs otherwise!
Chile, 1971: http://davidszondy.com/future/Dystopias/project_cybersyn.htm
DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
Product placement much?
I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
Just put him to playing Civilization or the like, and tell him he's running the country.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
While your country is in a rescission, your people are in the streets protesting, and having to budget for a simple can of beans what does the government do?
Buy the most expensive, most shiny status symbol toy cause they cant be bothered to check their fucking email at their desk.
Someone else has already mentioned dev accounts, but it's also possible to run an enterprise app store. Perhaps not worth it for just one iPad but I wouldn't be surprised if that's the way they go since it will be seen as the proper approach.
I have no idea why the summary says MPs are only allowed iPads in the House of Commons. Members are allowed to use smartphones or tablet computers, there are no brand restrictions placed upon them.
It's really hard to identify when any president is really on vacation. Obama doubtless golfs with people he needs to talk to and discusses business just like GWB used to host foreign leaders at his ranch in Texas. Neither one is a vacation or 'just' a golf game in my book but each's political opponents count them as goof off time.
This whole app sounds like a modern rip-off of Salvador Allende's star-trek-ish proto-internet, Cybersyn
Future headline #86: "GM to Recall Three Remaining Cars"
'... who wants you to declare independence and try to be seen as a Nordic country.'
This probably just means Alex Salmond has given his 'Braveheart' DVD a rest and got hooked by 'The Killing' like the rest of us:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killing_(Danish_TV_series)#UK_success
The ECHR may, or may not, be "vague and littered with exceptions", but it does not come from the EU - it's the product of the Council of Europe, which was formed in 1949, and of which the UK is a founder member.
There are two, quite distinct, legal Europes - the European Union, and the Council of Europe.
The EU has 27 members, the CoE has 47.
The EU court is the Court of Justice of the European Union, which sits in Luxembourg.
The CoE's court, the European Court of Human Rights, sits in Strasbourg.
Politicians are hypocritical! Shock horror.
I'm in Scotland and we've got the Nationals in 'power' at the moment (we get Education, Health, Income Tax, Law and some others, but money and legislation on Power, Defence, Foreign Policy etc. comes from Westminster). There will be an Independence referendum in the next year or so and I'm still undecided myself which way I'll vote. There are pros and cons for each side. The biggest Pro would be finally kicking the Tories out of Scotland.
Sure, they got that bit of the Borders, but there's about 10 people living there and half of them are English. Ofcourse, then we're left with Labour as our most right-wing party of note, since our National Party are about as left as the Liberals.
The biggest Con would be keeping our economy working. Especially with the way Europe is at the moment (and no amount of increased trade with Norway will counter that).
What I'm scared of is that I don't know enough to make an informed choice. And that people in general have lost faith in politics in a broad sense because they feel they don't know enough, and don't CARE enough to find out. They just trust that each party is pretty much the same as the other ones and just vote for the person that shouts the loudest at them.
Here in Scotland we have Holyrood, who defer to Westminster for certain issues, who defer to the EU on top of that. I know here we have three systems to worry about, and three Elections to vote in. We vote in MSPs, MPs and MEPs. Each parliament is so monolithic and entwined in their own red tape that the general population don't know what each one of them *really* does, and who controls what and are so fatigued by it that voter turnout for the last Scottish Election was 50%. Half the people in Scotland didn't turn up to vote.
It's 2am here. I'm rambling. Hopefully some of it made sense :P
It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
" while one of the most stable democracies in the world self-terminates."
HUH? I never though you people cared about the United States.
Or is your goverment full of assholes, ingrates, and scumbags like ours?
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Here is a bit from CBS
predecessors? CBS Radio's Mark Knoller has kept track of presidential vacations for years and supplied the data.
So far, President Obama has taken 61 vacation days after 31 months in office. At this point in their presidencies, George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch where his staff often joined him for meetings. And Ronald Reagan had taken 112 vacation days at his ranch.
It does make sense to collaborate with your largest trading partners to produce a common base of legislation for trade and issues that directly affect trade (eg employment rights, movement of labour etc.). Think of it from a systems engineering perspective - a single trading market needs protocols in place to function. EU Directives specify the basic protocols. Each nation is free to implement those protocols as they wish in national law. A single market that crosses national boundaries can not function without a corresponding legal system to regulate it. For an analogy, imagine every city in your nation implemented different laws regarding trade, freedom of movement, residency, contract law, currency etc. Trade between those cities would become more difficult, and more expensive, and there would be considerable barriers to individuals relocating for work, which would make acquisition of talented employees more difficult.
$3000 for the enterprise dev license to load apps directly on your organization's idevices without the app store. apple even has a tool for IT drones to do it automatically
Actually they are underselling. Cameron is prime minister of the United Kingdom, not just Great Britain.
Waiting lists are inevitable in a system where demand slightly outstrips supply and so are valuable metrics on how the system in operating. That's not to say emergency treatment is restricted, but you will probably have to wait a while to get your bunions treated. It seems to me a sign of a mature and caring democracy where this metric *is* the primary concern of a society. Oh... and no one believes it is "free". It is only "free" at the point of delivery, we know we pay a lot for it and that's why we need to make sure we're receiving value for the money. This is why the metric is important.
Let's see some citations for this. I'm very tired of Europhobes banging on about how the EU has ruined the country when I'm yet to see a serious problem that cannot easily be attributed elsewhere e.g. poor banking regulation. The HRA is the favourite bogeyman of Europhobes. Please also give a list of the rights that you think people covered by UK law should not have.