Glimpse of Stephen Hawking's Computer

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Glimpse of Stephen Hawking's Computer

Posted by Unknown on Monday January 9, 2012 @10:20PM from the long-live-dectalk dept.

kenekaplan writes "Intel application engineer Travis Bonifield has been working closely with Hawking to communicate with the world for a decade. He's traveled from the United States to England every few years to hand-deliver Hawking a customized PC. Bonifield talks about the technology that powers the customized system." Hawking's latest machine is a Thinkpad x220. Lately he's been trouble speaking due to weakened cheek muscles (down to one word per minute). New Scientist has a brief interview with Hawking's outgoing technician on the challenges he faced. It turns out Hawking is still using a DECtalk (despite some reports suggesting otherwise).

27 of 146 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

DECtalk by Sockatume · 2012-01-09 22:23 · Score: 5, Funny

With a cat for scale. That's it, Wikipedia, we're through.

--
No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
1. Re:DECtalk by Anonymous Coward · 2012-01-09 22:31 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  You'd rather the cat be in a box?
2. Re:DECtalk by Sockatume · 2012-01-09 22:56 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  Nice try, Schrodinger.
  
  --
  No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
3. Re:DECtalk by Sockatume · 2012-01-09 23:17 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Without knowing whether it's an imperial or metric cat it's completely useless, though.
  
  --
  No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
4. Re:DECtalk by MiniMike · 2012-01-10 01:50 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  No, he's right- a cat makes a terrible scale. It only tells you if you're heavy enough to squish a cat.
5. Re:DECtalk by nomoreunusednickname · 2012-01-10 04:02 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  It only tells you if you're heavy enough to squish a cat.
  I find it useful to determine if a room is large enough to swing a cat.
He identifies with the voice now by Viol8 · 2012-01-09 22:25 · Score: 4, Insightful

So why the surprise that he still uses the DECTalk?
In this case if it is broke then someone probably will fix it.
1. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Nick+Fel · 2012-01-09 22:34 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  But I've never understood why the DECTalk voice can't be replicated in software. There must be someone capable and willing to do it for the publicity.
2. Re:He identifies with the voice now by HyperDrive · 2012-01-09 22:53 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  MESS has preliminary support for emulating the DECTalk.
3. Re:He identifies with the voice now by Joce640k · 2012-01-09 23:06 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  I read an article where he said he takes the robotic voice very personally, he regards it as his voice.
  He's a geek so wants the real thing, not some stupid software emulation. What's the fun of a wheelchair if you can't strap loads of wires and circuit boards to it?
  
  --
  No sig today...
4. Re:He identifies with the voice now by vlm · 2012-01-10 00:48 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  I read an article where he said he takes the robotic voice very personally, he regards it as his voice.
  He's a geek so wants the real thing, not some stupid software emulation.
  The first thing that instantly struck me is its rather like women and their rack. Some fraction love the idea of an upgrade, some hate the idea of an upgrade, but the feature that makes it most like the female chest situation is that Everybody Seems to Have A Strong Opinion about what upgrade strategy, if any, is best, and all the women I've talked to about that topic pretty much want all the folks with opinions one way or another to F off and when they want an opinion they'll darn well ask for it first.
  The other interesting thing Ive not considered is the legal / financial / employment minefield of whoever is the "new voice of Hawking" is absolutely going to advertise that, and he might not be cool with getting into that whole scene. So on one hand he should get money, on the other hand he doesn't need money, on the other hand the money would be coming from his fellow sufferers so that would make him a jerk, on the other hand he could donate his endorsement money to a charity, but what if the device he signs the contract for sucks and he wants to switch back, but if he doesn't sign an endorsement contract he's basically pulling money out of a charity, I can see a guy just saying F-it forget about the whole topic now back to black hole thermodynamics.
  The final part is /. and IT in general are populated by noobs who think nothing of upgrading because they've only been in the game 2 years so whats one upgrade during an entire lifetime? But he's pretty much in it for life, and I know from personal experience that when you can skip upgrade cycles, you're best off doing so if at all possible. Sometimes not possible. At work I do not scrap the old gear and spec out an entirely new amplifier line solely because one corporation released one new microwave RF transistor today (and someone will release another next week, repeat into the indefinite future). I can totally see the guy saying there is no point in upgrading every time something new is released and therefore living life as a perma-noob, especially if the performance gain is minor. I'm sure the world would rather have him thinking about physics than endlessly re-learning this months new synth release.
  
  --
  "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
One word a minute by EponymousCustard · 2012-01-09 22:31 · Score: 4, Insightful

And twitter users think they have problems with 140 characters.
At one word a minute, you get to really think about what you are gonna say.
1. Re:One word a minute by Luckyo · 2012-01-09 23:01 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  There are, but if you read the article, his problem is learning curve and the fact that if he's disconnected from the working machine and something is wrong, he can't call for help.
  I really suggest reading the articles linked. They are far more interesting then average stuff you get on slashdot and it answers a lot of questions as to "why is he still using this dated stuff". Especially the part that notes that when someone pitching a new system is in the room, Hawking's talking speed goes up because of his competitiveness and stubbornness.
2. Re:One word a minute by Noughmad · 2012-01-10 01:48 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  A brilliant theoretical physicist cannot learn a new (arguably easier) technology over a ten year period, yet alone flourish?
  Have you ever seen a professor trying to turn on a projector?
  
  --
  PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
3. Re:One word a minute by Luckyo · 2012-01-10 02:46 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  Funny my ass dear mods. That's about as informative as it will ever get on slashdot!
4. Re:One word a minute by camperdave · 2012-01-10 03:16 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  You, sir, just wasted three minutes of my life!
  
  --
  When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
5. Re:One word a minute by ajo_arctus · 2012-01-10 03:40 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  A very smart guy whom could average a few words a minute jumped at the concept of switching architectures on the suggestion of an industry shill at a conference?
  What? You appear to have read the article but completely missed some really important pieces of the puzzle. Here,
  
  Stephen and Gordon met at a conference around 1997. Gordon noted that Stephen was using an AMD machine. Gordon asked Stephen, "Would you like to use an Intel computer moving forward? We'd be happy to build that for you and support it."
  The article makes it very clear that the Gordon in that sentence is Gordon Moore. You know, of Moore's law fame. One of the guys who started Intel the first place. Calling Moore an industry Shill is like saying Gates shilled for Microsoft or Jobs shilled for Apple.
  The article is just some guy's anecdote. Don't get so worked up.
DecTalk is a warhorse by assemblerex · 2012-01-09 22:33 · Score: 5, Insightful

Why the Dectalk hate? It served the world well for many many years and will for a lot longer than most people think.
1. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by ciderbrew · 2012-01-09 22:55 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Maybe he want to keep using it as it is now *his* voice. Beyond any technical issue, that bit of kit is synonymous with him and he doesn't want it replaced upgraded or changed.
2. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by MichaelSmith · 2012-01-09 23:02 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Does DECTalk posses some unique quality that is not easily replicated?
  It is Hawkings voice.
  
  --
  http://michaelsmith.id.au
3. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by JasterBobaMereel · 2012-01-09 23:13 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  Someone found recordings of his original voice and offered to build a voice around this, but Hawking said that he did not even recognise it as his own voice anymore ...
  
  --
  Puteulanus fenestra mortis
4. Re:DecTalk is a warhorse by martin-boundary · 2012-01-09 23:32 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  I could totally see Hawking with the voice of HAL 9000.
  Student: What if I integrate this term on the left here?
  Hawking: I'm afraid you can't do that, Dave.
Wrong question by Viol8 · 2012-01-09 22:58 · Score: 5, Insightful

"asking why someone uses a 30 year old electronic device when newer and therefore likely more capable options exist"
You should be asking - why someone WOULDN'T use a 30 year old device when it does everything they need it to do. Not everyone thinks upgrading for the sake of it is a worthwhile pursuit especially if its as critical as your only means to communicate.
1. Re:Wrong question by Lumpy · 2012-01-10 00:37 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  From my experience.. the 30 year old device is built better, higher quality and will continue to operate for another 50 years. Unlike the utter crap that is available today that you will be lucky to keep working for 5 years.
  
  --
  Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Typo in summary by Rik+Sweeney · 2012-01-09 23:24 · Score: 4, Funny

Lately he's been trouble speaking due to weakened cheek muscles (down to one word per minute).
I see Slashdot's come up with a simple solution that just involves skipping words that don't seem necessary :)

--
Summation 2
Same for everyone with recordings of their voice by Viol8 · 2012-01-09 23:36 · Score: 4, Insightful

None of us really recognise our recorded voice as our own even though we know it is so I guess thats not much of a surprise especially given that 30 years has passed in his case too. I'd be interested to know what Hawkings internal voice in his head sounds like - is it his original voice or is it his speech synthesizer?
The most profound mystery in the Universe is ... by Framboise · 2012-01-09 23:48 · Score: 5, Interesting

From the Telegraph link, we happily learn:
In an interview with the New Scientist magazine to mark his 70th birthday on Sunday, January 8, he was asked: "What do you think most about during the day?" to which he replied: "Women. They are a complete mystery."