Slashdot Mirror


Kodak Files For Bankruptcy Protection

Snirt writes "Following up on a story previously discussed here, it now appears Eastman Kodak, the company that invented the hand-held camera, has filed for bankruptcy protection. The move, according to Kodak's news release, gives the company time to reorganize itself without facing its creditors, and Kodak said it would mean business as normal for customers. The company has recently moved away from cameras, focusing on making printers to stem falling profits."

16 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Kodak's Moment by xmas2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sad to see ... but they've been living off patents and selling assets the last couple of years ... so not surprising they ran outa $$$

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Kodak's Moment by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Kodak didn't die because they stopped innovating... they died because they removed themselves from the camera-making business. Then, when it became clear that people wanted digital, they had no expertise or market presence in cameras. Why would someone buy a Kodak camera when they could buy a Nikon or Canon, or even a Pentax or Vivitar... anyone who had been making cameras already.

      Apple is at the complete opposite side of things - they are a hardware company first and foremost. If the smart phone market goes away, along with the tablet and PC markets, then yeah Apple is screwed. If they fail to stay state-of-the-art, then yeah they are screwed. But they are not a big producer of consumables like Kodak was - Kodak is more like Gillette than Apple.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Kodak's Moment by flanders123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this +5? Over the past decades Apple has:

      -(Re)invented the home computer market
      -(Re)invented the digital music market
      -(Re)invented the mobile phone market
      -(Re)Invented the mobile app market
      -(Re)invented the tablet market

      Like them or not, equating Apple to a non-innovating dinosaur like Kodak is about the worst analogy I have seen on /, ... and that is saying something.

    3. Re:Kodak's Moment by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had no idea Kodak had anything going on with digital cameras that far back,

      Kodak, quite literally, *invented* digital cameras. They could've released them while they still had legitimate patents on all of it. Instead, they became the poster child for the business advice, "If you don't release the better product that cannibalizes what you're selling now, someone else will."

  2. Printers were a bad idea by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was a summer intern at KRL (Kodak Research Labs), working on digital image processing, when the whole printer thing took off, and it was painfully obvious to us that it was a terrible move. Putting Bill Lloyd (formerly head of inkjet work) in place as CTO seemed to cement things in place.

    Who prints anything at home these days, anyway? Especially photos....

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  3. You get the frost pits, we do the rest by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    tl;dr: don't be afraid of cannibalizing your own sales. Because if you don't, some other bugger will anyway.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:You get the frost pits, we do the rest by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a good rule for business, I like it.

      Kodak died by not getting into the digital "thing" quickly enough and then doing poorly by the time they did. Same with Polaroid, really. Too stubborn to admit that their technology was coming to the end of an era and develop a replacement and instead letting their competitors (and even just random no-name companies at the time) do it for them.

      At least they'll die having done almost nothing but film photography, so it looks like they just died as the industry for that died, rather than dragging the name through the dirt for decades trying to cling on to film's replacement.

      I don't get attached to brands, but I do object to people running their businesses badly. The world's largest consumer of silver at one point - but totally failed to adapt when everyone stopped buying film. It's not a nice epitaph.

    2. Re:You get the frost pits, we do the rest by edoules · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He said: 'Kodak died by not getting into the digital "thing" quickly enough and then doing poorly by the time they did.' Does that make him right, rightitty right right?

  4. Failure to adapt... by ToadProphet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny how little concern is shown by legislators about the failure of this business due to changing technology, yet it is so determined to protect those in the music and movie industry.

    --
    It's on America's tortured brow, That Mickey Mouse has grown up a cow
    1. Re:Failure to adapt... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Legislators would pay a whole lot more attention if Kodak gave them a couple hundred grand in "campaign contributions".

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Failure to adapt... by Morty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a big difference between "people no longer have a use for any of your products" and "people still want your products but have figured out how to avoid paying for them."

  5. If you actually invent stuff... by voss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and other people use it, then you have the right to be compensated for that use.

    Were not talking about patent trolling, Kodak invented technologies, uses those technologies in its own products, and licenses those techs to other companies.
    Whats wrong with that. Apple wants to use its patents to block competition while Kodak wants people (including Apple) to pay when they use its technology. Kodak historically has treated its customers and its employees very well(with pensions including retiree health insurance).

    1. Re:If you actually invent stuff... by c0lo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and other people use it, then you have the right to be compensated for that use.

      Even better: if you stop inventing and people stop using your products, you still have a right to fill for bankruptcy protection.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  6. Classic Case of Self-Inflicted Wounding by ios+and+web+coder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work in the digital imaging industry, and have long interacted with Kodak engineers and digital imaging people.

    Many years ago, at a FlashPix conference (anyone remember that chestnut?), I remember talking to a digital imaging manager, who told me that his efforts to promote digital imaging were being deliberately sabotaged by higher-ups, who had thrown their lot in with film, and were seeing none of "this new-fangled digital imaging" stuff.

    At that point, I knew that Kodak was screwed.

    This is really sad. Kodak should have ruled the industry.

    It is an object lesson in that phrase Stuart Brand coined: "Once a new technology rolls over you, you are either part of the road, or part of the steamroller."

    --

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

    -H. L. Mencken

  7. it is patent trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    and other people use it, then you have the right to be compensated for that use.

    Were not talking about patent trolling, Kodak invented technologies, uses those technologies in its own products, and licenses those techs to other companies.
    Whats wrong with that.

    Patent trolling is usually understood to be when a company or individual uses a strategy of making money from lawsuits rather than selling products. Kodak has all but admitted that this is its strategy.

    Apple wants to use its patents to block competition while Kodak wants people (including Apple) to pay when they use its technology.

    Say what you will about Apple, but it actually makes stuff and sells it to get money.

    Kodak historically has treated its customers and its employees very well(with pensions including retiree health insurance).

    Aww, are we one of the beneficiaries of the Great Yellow Father? Is that why we're jumping in to defend them? Aww, your loyalty is so touching.

  8. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So. You are saying that ... "Nothing of value was lost"

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?