Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay To Offer Physical Item Downloads

lukehopewell1 writes "The Pirate Bay is offering users the chance to download and print out real objects using 3D printers in what the pirate site is hailing as 'the future.'" Amir Taaki mentions that among the new "physibles" uploaded to the Pirate Bay are "plans for a tabletop replica for a Warhammer 40k dreadnought that got taken down in December with a DMCA request." Downloadable 3D models have been around for a while; MakerBot users are probably all familiar with the Thingiverse. Couple TPB with a cheap method of accurate 3D scanning, though, and I wonder what illegal shapes will emerge.

73 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Car by Rinisari · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to download a car!

    1. Re:Car by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Funny

      You wouldn't, though.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Car by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, yes I would.

    3. Re:Car by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    4. Re:Car by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't Copy That Jalopy!!

    5. Re:Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sir, you win so many friggin' internets.

    6. Re:Car by na1led · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can download Parts for your Car! think of old those small broken plastics that cost a fortune from the dealer, now you can just print it.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    7. Re:Car by twotacocombo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or streetbike plastics. Those things cost a bloody fortune to replace, and they're just molded ABS!

    8. Re:Car by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2

      Actually I was thinking about that recently when I got my first car. It's old, over 30 years. It's getting to the point where even scrapyards don't have the parts anymore.

      A lot of the parts that have broken on it are little ABS plastic thingies, things like plastic mounts for switches, little cogs for opening the heater vents, knobs, etc...

      All this is well within the range of the current generation of 3D printers (and I'm sure things will get better on the printer front).

      Wouldn't it be nice if there was a single online repository where you could upload parts for others to use? That way it would reduce the effort required in maintaining/upgrading older cars. I can tell you that I'm reaching the point when I've started hand making replacement parts from plexiglass and a dremel. A 3D printer would be a godsend (and when I save up enough I'll probably buy a reprap just for this purpose).

      People could even improve on the designs, allowing for even more customisation of their cars.

      The metal parts of the car you can't print at the moment, but that's ok, generally any good machine shop will be able to do those parts for you anyway, plus those seem to be the most hard wearing.

      What do you think guys? Any site like this out there? Perhaps we should make one?

  2. Wow... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those "You wouldn't download a car, would you?" warnings on the beginning of DVD's are going to be funny when people actually are downloading cars...

    For the record, I totally would.

    1. Re:Wow... by robot256 · · Score: 2

      How about the plans to a Ford Model T or Model A ? Should be in the public domain by now....

      Not if they were never published. Trade secrets can stay that way forever. I forget what the law says about leaked trade secrets, though.

    2. Re:Wow... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

      Fuck that. We can design our own Open Source car!

    3. Re:Wow... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      Fuck that. We can design our own Open Source car!

      I'm so gonna cruise around in The Homer...

    4. Re:Wow... by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

      It'll have twenty times the gas mileage of any commercial car and be completely impervious to theft, but steerable only via console commands.


      user@car$ left 30
      user@car$ right 30
      user@car$ speed 90
      user@car$ braek
      braek: command not found
      user@car$ BRAKE
      BRAKE: command not found
      user@car$ brake
      The program 'brake' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:
      sudo apt-get install brake

      (Unless it's an Ubuntu car, in which case it will have a colorful and animated dashboard that will completely change form twice a year.)

    5. Re:Wow... by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is why this fight over copyrights is so crucial to the future of humanity. The resolution has to be that the cost of a copyrighted product is somewhat proportional to [ (production cost / number of sales) + distribution cost ]. That doesn't happen if the copyright holder has a monopoly. If we allow it to continue to be (production cost * constant) for a single purchase like it currently is, millions if not billions of innovative and useful products are going to be locked up behind copyright for 130+ years. Human technological progress is going to continue at its current pace, instead of skyrocketing into a new creative renaissance because the benefits of near-zero cost of duplication will primarily go towards lining the pockets of copyright holders rather than making useful products widely available to the public.

      Either the capacity to profit from copyright has to scale inversely with number of sales (legally force prices to be lowered as sales increase), or the term has to be shortened to where good designs enter the public domain quickly so all can benefit from it. The goal here is to maximize net benefit to society. That sits between the two extremes of giving the public everything for free, and maximizing profit for the copyright holder. Unfortunately the two most popular views on copyright seem to sit at those extremes.

    6. Re:Wow... by mutube · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Unless it's an Ubuntu car, in which case it will have a colorful and animated dashboard that will completely change form twice a year.)

      And they'll change the order of the pedals.

  3. 3D printers == sex toys industry by tekrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the first thing with any new tech? Porn! So, 3D printers will be used to make sex toys.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:3D printers == sex toys industry by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what next, DRM on a vibrator? Oh boy I bet that could get frustratingly interesting.

    2. Re:3D printers == sex toys industry by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      cheap 3d scanners would make this the next, frightening, landscape in "sexting".

      Not content to send each other pictures of their genitals, teens will soon be sending each other schematics for them.

    3. Re:3D printers == sex toys industry by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Google 'the plaster caster'.

      There is nothing new under the sun.

      IIRC she was considering selling replicas of her 'rock star' collection.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:3D printers == sex toys industry by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

      > 3D printers 8==D sex toys industry

      Fixed your subject for you.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:3D printers == sex toys industry by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      I can see it now...

      1. Scan
      2. Enlarge 50%
      3. Send to random lady
      4. ???
      5. PROFIT!

      --
      Eat the rich.
    6. Re:3D printers == sex toys industry by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Wedding rings are anti-sex toys. You mean engagement rings.

  4. Careful, now... by Jawnn · · Score: 2

    In some states, certain shapes may only be downloaded as an "adult novelty item".

  5. Fissible? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wanna download an A-bomb!

    1. Re:Fissible? by robot256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wanna download an A-bomb!

      Won't do you any good unless you can find a plutonium ink cartridge.

    2. Re:Fissible? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

      Still cheaper than HP's price on cyan.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  6. Not Turtles by Lectoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's dildos all the way down.

    --
    Is it just me, or do you hate it when people say "Is it just me..."?
  7. LPs by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I look forward to being able to download a 3D model of an LP, that I can play on my turntable. Take that, RIAA!

  8. The future comes, are we ready by PerlJedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This calls to mind Corey Doctorow's short story "Printcrime".

    1. Re:The future comes, are we ready by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      What is this, Slashdot for the illiterates? How about a link to the story, instead of some weird robot thing reading it for you? Still, at least we now have evidence that illiteracy actually is a job requirement for working at Slashdot...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:The future comes, are we ready by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

      That's an awesome story.

  9. Malware? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Download what is supposed to be a car, end up with a literal bag of dicks...this is gonna bring trolling to a whole new level!

    1. Re:Malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dickroll. I'm just gonna throw that out there.

  10. Re:How would you register a downloaded car? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's the one thing I'm not sure of. I'm all for downloading one, but where can I get a VIN to make it street legal?

    This is the least of your concerns -- people do build their own cars in garages and there are procedures in place to register those cars. The real problem with downloading a car is that Detroit will join Hollywood in attacking new technologies rather than updating their business model.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  11. Re:How would you register a downloaded car? by vlm · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's the one thing I'm not sure of. I'm all for downloading one, but where can I get a VIN to make it street legal?

    In most states you'll not be surprised to learn there is a form and a nominal fee to have the state assign you one.

    Happens ALL the time for homemade custom boat trailers and to a much lesser extent homemade motorcycles and cars.

    Its not usually much of an issue. "Red states" stereotypically seem to have a half page form and want like $5, "Blue states" stereotypically seem to have a 30 page form and want $100, but its always possible...

    The biggest "problem" you'll encounter is most states have a certain location, size, and technique required to permanently deface the vehicle with the new VIN. Usually engraving a part of the frame meets the legal obligation, but how you engrave the frame ranges from "hold my beer and watch what I do with a dremel" all the way up to strange photoetching techniques.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  12. Or, along this vein, What about a bust of by bdwoolman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rick Astley?

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  13. offensive by JigJag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The mere idea that there is such a thing as an illegal shape is offensive.

    JigJag

    --
    "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    1. Re:offensive by twotacocombo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean like the German ban of public display of the hakenkreuz?

    2. Re:offensive by Tom · · Score: 4, Informative

      Twitter-level knowledge does not entitle one to spread bullshit around.

      You are talking about Â86 StGB, though you've almost certainly never heard about nor read it.

      There is extensive literature on the reasoning behind, the legality of and the exceptions allowed by this Â. It is not that the shape is illegal. In fact, to this day you find the symbol in all kinds of places, embedded in architecture and the like. No one has ever gone to clean it up. It is also in public display at museums, in history books, etc. etc. etc.

      But, you know, we kind of felt like not wanting to have the symbols of an evil cult that caused the death of some 50 mio. or so people around. The guys who wrote the law knew about trolls even though the Internet wasn't yet invented.

      It's a good law and very few people inside Germany would want it removed. And to the best of my knowledge, nobody who isn't a Nazi has ever been convicted on it.

      Oh, and before you start the usual bullshit about how the USA is so much better and has Free Speech, you should know one more detail about german history: Those early laws of the modern Germany were written shortly after the war, and were massively influenced by the Allies, mostly the Americans.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  14. Re:cue the forbidden stuff by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

    - That crowbar-like tool for breaking into cars

    This is commonly called a Slim Jim, and owning one is not illegal. (At least not where I live.)
    When I was young I worked for an auto detailer, and one of the suppliers I dealt with had entire kits in his truck. I found my hand made stuff was better.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  15. Not made in China! by na1led · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, I can finally own stuff not made in China!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Not made in China! by caseih · · Score: 2

      And at only 10-100 times the cost!

    2. Re:Not made in China! by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      my stained glass class teacher

      How long have you had to wait to be able to drop that gem into the conversation here?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. Re:*Gazing into crystal ball* by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, in some US states, they are illegal to sell or to posess in quantity. Texas and Alabama at least, and I believe quite a few more, have made the sale of sex toys a criminal offence. I'm not going to google the details from work, look it up yourself. That's one reason you'll often see them sold as 'novelty' items: The manufacuters maintain some facade of them not really being what they are, knowing that most of the time the police have more important laws to enforce. Every now and again some local politician orders a crackdown to win the Family Values voters over.

  17. Print your own stuff. by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was discussing this with my brother about a year back. We were in the store looking at this warhammer stuff, and I remarked that these dye-cast figures aren't any more complicated (probably less so) than hotwheels. Yet peopel are paying $5 a piece for them, or getting special sets of "rare" pieces for over $50. I was saying that eventually people would just be printing their own models on 3D printers. I guess the future is here. And good for it. I always thought some of these games were a little odd. Things like Magic Cards. Who-ever spends the most on their deck has a huge advantage over everyone else. Sure there's skill involved at some level, in knowing which cards to put in the deck in the first place, but a lot of it is spending money obtaining that deck. I would be like playing chess, where one player had all queens because he had spent a bunch of money.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  18. 3D Printer by Karlb · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't own a 3D printer, so I think the first item i'd download is one of them!

    --
    When all else fails, you've won.
    1. Re:3D Printer by PSVMOrnot · · Score: 4, Informative
  19. Re:How would you register a downloaded car? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Blue states" stereotypically seem to have a 30 page form and want $100, but its always possible...

    Yeah but 20 pages of that are questions like "How does this car effect the aura of the driver?" and "Is there any possibility that this car could create a hostile work environment for a LGBT or minority?"

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  20. Lol, you suck at business by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off, what is your credit card processing fee? There is a reason Apple isn't laughing all of the way to the bank with iTunes but the credit companies ARE laughing their ass off. It all depends on your size and your risks (chargebacks) but gosh darn, you might be suprised that your 25 cent fee ends up mostly at the credit card company. That is nobody does a charge back and you have to pay anywhere up from ten bucks for it. With your 25 cents, 1 chargeback costs you 40 paying customers, well it would IF you could use all their quarters to pay for the 1 chargeback, which you can't because other things will have to payed from it as I already stated.

    Further more, you say the movie costs 20 bucks, even if rentals worked like that, which they don't, you need 80 paying customers (IF you could keep the entire quarter) just to break even. Meanwhile, your entire legal case rests on the fact that there is only ONE copy around for each possesion, so if 80 customers want the same movie at the same time, you need 80 x 20 bucks to satisfy demand. Now you need a total of 640 paying customers... IF you could keep the entire quarter which once again, you cannot.

    I keep hammering on this because a lot of noobs to business think that money is free. You sell something and everything the customer pays, ends up in your pocket. Transaction costs HURT many a small business and is the reason you can't buy a nickle item with a credit card.

    The most annoying thing is that this doesn't have to be the case, in the EU payments systems are far far cheaper per transaction, on the order of cents rather then quarters and are even free. Whenever I have to implement a CC solution because people in the EU thinks it will mean the world I find it very amusing to show them the fee structures. It is like telling a baby how their candy will be taken.

    Oh, and those transaction costs, you have them DOUBLE. Two transactions... all to be payed out of 1 quarter dollar along with all your other costs.

    You should put this in a business case and present it at your bank. They need a good laugh.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Lol, you suck at business by amoeba1911 · · Score: 2

      Please, don't be such a pompous head just because you know about credit card transaction fees. The poor schmuck has a good idea, and he's trying to think outside of the box. Just because you're used to a world that works in a certain fixed way doesn't mean that's the only way the world can work.

      I have paid 25 cents with a credit card before. I pay with credit card all the time and I don't like carrying loose change with me. If something costs 25 cents + tax, that means you'll be getting back about two quarters, two dimes and three pennies. I don't want all that loose change around me.

      As for getting around the "per transaction fees", one can easily avoid them by making the users purchase "points" where you have to buy in $10 increments minimum. You can encourage less transactions with bigger value by providing a small extra bonus when the user buys in bigger increments: 10 points for $10, 110 points for $100. Suddenly, you can have something that costs only 10 cents and the transaction fees will not hurt you.

      Personally, I think backslashdot's idea is great, but the movie rental movie business is filled with incumbents who will pull every string to make sure you have almost no chance at creating a competition for them.

  21. Well that and... by Brain-Fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    You cannot build a functional combustion engine out of any substance malleable enough to be usable by a cheap consumer-grade 3d printer.

    Cars require metal parts, and metal parts require more powerful equipment to forge.

    1. Re:Well that and... by FrozenFood · · Score: 3, Informative

      get CAD file.

      send CAD file to CNC company instead of 3d printer $$$$$ for 4 cylinder engine block

      profit?

      people hail these 3D printers as something new. CNC lathes and milling machines have been doing this for decades. its just the materal is diffrent. you DO know you can send a cad/3d model to a company and they will make parts for you out of plastic/stainless/titanium, without inventing the words "3d printer"

    2. Re:Well that and... by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      unless someone gets a car, takes it apart, turn all components into 3d models and assemblies, and sends those CAD files away to be made by a CNC company.

      What is wrong with that method? A lot of replica kit cars (like Lancia, Lamborghini's and Ferrari's) are done by buying (or if you're cheeky, renting) the car you want to replicate, strip it into parts, copy the components into 3D models (and reassemble & return the car if rented/borrowed).

      You then use the 3D models to fabricate the parts again. In the case of some kit cars (like the Lancia Stratos) the parts are 100% interchangeable with the original. In other cases the 3D models are adapted to fit a more common car (e.g. Ferrari F355 kit on a Toyota MR2 body).

      Interestingly I've not heard much about these kit car manufacturers being shut down, despite the cars being sold for profit and in many cases this has been done for decades. It seems that its legal to reverse engineer cars (or at least nobody has bothered to set precedent against).

  22. Inevitable, but more illegal stuff on the way? by chroma · · Score: 2

    Copyright and trademark infringement are common and this sort of thing has been a source of controversy for a while now.

    But the next big blowup will be over things that are illegal in themselves just by their shape and arrangement of parts. I'm talking about things like weapons, drug paraphernalia, and pathogens. It's likely we'll see a crackdown or at least a panic resulting in calls for licensure of many of the most useful creation tools ever designed.

    Take the humble AK-47 rifle, for example. It's designed for ease of manufacture, making it a likely target for replication. This makes enforcing highly restrictive gun laws very difficult in a world full of machines that can build them from simple raw materials.

    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    1. Re:Inevitable, but more illegal stuff on the way? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Look the AK-47 has been made in countries that can barely keep a car running. You don't need a 3D printer. Just a basic metal shop.

      3D printing is not the answer to most of the questions you guys are posing.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Inevitable, but more illegal stuff on the way? by WillAdams · · Score: 2

      Manufacturing ammunition is doable:

      http://www.amazon.com/Do-Yourself-Gunpowder-Cookbook/dp/0873646754/ref=tmm_pap_title_0

      and brass is easy to mill for cases or primer --- casting bullets is straight-forward enough.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:Inevitable, but more illegal stuff on the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about one individual part? There is a device available for AR-15 rifles called a lightning link. This device will turn it into a fully automatic weapon. Because of this, the small lightning link (about the size of 2 cigarettes) is classified as an automatic weapon on its own. Possession of this small thin piece of metal is a federal crime without proper authorization by the government. On its own, you couldn't even tell what this thing is, but it's still considered an automatic weapon.

      The future is already here...

  23. Re:*Gazing into crystal ball* by AngryDeuce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're selectively enforced. Believe me, if they need a reason to bust your ass and can't come up with anything else, they'll be perfectly happy to break out that shit if they need to.

  24. Re:cue the forbidden stuff by GospelHead821 · · Score: 2

    It would be pointless to forbid Warhammer figures. Some players are more or less serious about supporting the games companies and therefore more or less serious about proxying. I'm sure you'd find, however, that any generic toy soldier models could be printed in quantity. Communities will evolve that use entire proxy sets and just agree, by convention, which generic models correspond to which Warhammer models. Of course, you could do this with ordinary, plastic toy soldiers now but that's not quite as satisfying. If you can replace your copyrighted Dwarven Axe Berserkers with creative commons Dwarfish Adze Maniacs, you retain most of the flavour that makes the original models so fun.

    --
    Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
    Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
  25. Re:for a while by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, we all like to play with our memes, (it's practically at that multi choice form), but isn't anyone seeing who else is really threatened?

    Try the Toy industry! In one sense, toys are "sorta stupid", just big hunks of plastic with the computing power of a watch.

    Bye bye $60 for some Sit and Spin thingie!

    Oh dear skies alive, having the TOY lawyers playing with the media lawyers? *Cringe*

    Plus this thing is gonna play hell with Patent vs. Copyright.

    "Oh, the patent expired? Let's copyright the Replicator Formula for 100 years!"

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  26. Re:Bad idea by Tmack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The output of the 3d printers will be made of a completely different substance than the specialized car parts. The different substance will likely have different heat and pressure tolerances, different tensile strength, and so on. It probably won't work, and could cause damage.

    Maybe, but they would make a great pattern to build a mold so that the part could be reproduced with the proper materials.

    -Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  27. 3D printers are not scary by Palpatine_li · · Score: 2

    DNA synthesizers are. Guess TPB is going to have seeds for Ebola sequence in ten years and soon be labeled a terrorist site after that.

  28. Why bother copying at all? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    I mean, why not start with, say, a basic template for that sort of figure, and add in your own detail with a 3d modelling program, and create an original figure that you can then "print" out and utilize? I mean, what on earth makes having a duplicate of that particular figure so worthwhile that one should be inclined to even *want* to copy it?

    I know if I had that sort of tech at home, I'd be making all kinds of customization to figures, rather than wanting to duplicate something that somebody else has done. And while granted, not everybody has the time or the inclination to want to do that sort of thing, I still find myself at a loss to understand why a person would rather copy something commercial than something somebody else might have made for free. Especially considering that home 3d printers generally can't actually do the kinds of fine detail that typically goes into metal figures of that size.

  29. Re:illegal items, eh? by Truekaiser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shapes are already illegal. Look at what apple is trying to do to samsung's galaxy s phones and tablets.

  30. Re:How would you register a downloaded car? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Funny

    In order to balance out the force of partisan jokes, I ask of the red state forms include 'Does it have holders for beer and shotgun?' and 'Does it run on almighty Texas Tea, or Pathetic Lieberal 'Leccy?'

    Yours are funnier though. Bah. I need more tea to make jokes well.

  31. Games Work$hop legal dept... by xhrit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    About five years ago I was forced to abandon development of a project I started called 'Vassal 40k', under threat of legal action by Games Workshop. After I received the takedown request I deleted all files I had that pertained to the project, removed all links to it from sites I was hosting, and terminated the bit torrent seeds on my fileserver.

    A few minutes ago I found a torrent for Vassal 40k on Pirate Bay.

    Since I include complete source in all my distributions, it was easy for different people over the years to take over the project and add new stuff. Every few months while browsing the web I will find a video on youtube of people playing, or read a blog where someone has used it to write a battle report. Several times over the years I almost downloaded it. Then I imagine that having those files on my computer might be enough justification for armed men to kick down my door and take everything I own at gunpoint.

    The incident has left me with little desire to play Warhammer 40k, but I do not support the actions of Pirate Bay. As a developer I believe that the rights of copyright holders should be respected. I publish my personal projects under Open Source licenses and would be pretty mad if I found out someone was in violation. I honestly think that Vassal 40k, the project I spent months of my time coding, testing, and creating art for, should be taken down off Pirate Bay and people should never use it again.

    If Games Workshop does not want us spending our time developing games for their IP as fans, we shouldn't. Instead spend our time creating our own original open source game content as competitors.

  32. Re:How do you get starting with 3d printing by b0bby · · Score: 2

    http://www.makerbot.com/

    Under $2000 to get going.

  33. Re:cue the forbidden stuff by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and the one that gets you busted is the Mickey Mouse ears.

    5 years for pirating a Michael Jackson CD
    4 years for killing Michael Jackson
    Seriously :-(

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
  34. Re:cue the forbidden stuff by Sparton · · Score: 2

    Two things: tournaments, and cost.

    I think most official tournaments require at least X% of a model be a GW model (allowing for green stuff modifications, small addons, etc). With 3D printers, you could print out everything, and there's probably no way in hell that Games Workshop could call you on it (possible excuses to not look like the real models: I modded it, it came damaged like that, I mixed bits, etc). Since GW has been slowly moving towards making damn near everything plastic instead of pewter, there's nothing stopping anyone from just printing most of (if not their their entire) army out.

    The other extremely important vector is cost. Once 3D printers catch on, there's no way $20 blisters, $40 large models, $60+ unit boxes, etc will compete with the alternatives of 3D printing the actual designs (and don't you worry, the designs will circulate no matter what anyone tries to do). GW marks these suckers up (more in places like Canada, bastards), and I'm fairly certain it's where they make most of their money. Not even casual players could ignore this, and they can keep the same designs that everyone else uses, with probably no one who'd call them on it the wiser.

    Once they can't guarantee profits from models... where are they going to make their money? Paints are easily substituted, rulebooks are few and far between for most players, scenery could be bought for a fraction of the cost elsewhere or made by hand... their entire business model will need to be rethought from the ground up.

  35. Re:Tea. by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Funny

    And you'll get a cupful of liquid that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  36. Re:Bad idea by petermgreen · · Score: 2

    You wouldn't print your mould directly, you'd print a model, then pack moulding sand round the model to form a mould. Then remove the model and pour in the metal.

    Depending on the complexity of the part you could either go for a reusable model or a model that you melt out of the mould before using it. (like with lost wax casting)

    Though if it's a mechanical part you would probablly need to do some machining after casting to get tight enough tolerances on the important surfaces.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register