Slashdot Mirror


Chromium-Based Spinoffs Worth Trying

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Serdar Yegulalp takes an in-depth look at six Chromium-based spinoffs that bring privacy, security, social networking, and other interesting twists to Google's Chrome browser. 'When is it worth ditching Chrome for a Chromium-based remix? Some of the spinoffs are little better than novelties. Some have good ideas implemented in an iffy way. But a few point toward some genuinely new directions for both Chrome and other browsers.'"

43 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Re:F-I-R-S-T by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Extra crap like a bundled closed-source Flash plugin?

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  2. 6 spinoffs by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Informative

    6 more goofy names that mean nothing (internet explorer? ok, Netscape Navigator? ok, SRWare Iron, Comodo Dragon, Iceweasel? wtf)

    ps here is the print version, so you dont have to wade through 6 ad infested pages

    http://www.infoworld.com/print/184923

    1. Re:6 spinoffs by bonch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know, those names are so weird and have no relation to web-browsing.

      Excuse me while I use Chrome, Firefox, and Opera.

    2. Re:6 spinoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was a pretty immature and petty thing to do, but well within their rights.

      They had no choice. Debian, being a free distro, couldn't use Firefox's non-free logo. So they didn't, and Mozilla decided to give them the finger:

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation_software_rebranded_by_the_Debian_project#Origins_of_the_issue_and_of_the_Iceweasel_name :

      In February 2006, Mike Connor, representing the Mozilla Corporation, wrote to the Debian bug tracker and informed the project that Mozilla did not consider the way in which Debian was using the Firefox name to be acceptable.

    3. Re:6 spinoffs by thedrunkensailor · · Score: 2

      An iceweasel is the opposite of a firefox

      --
      i support the right to offend.
    4. Re:6 spinoffs by stms · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been wondering when /. would do a story on this. I've been using Iron as my secondary browser for when something doesn't work in Firefox. If you want more stable version of Chromium that protects your privacy better than Chrome Iron is a pretty good option.

    5. Re:6 spinoffs by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure it is, if you want to package something that's not Firefox, but just uses 99.9% of the code you typically just fork it. Or you do like Linux Mint and change the name and add a patchset over the top.

      I seriously wonder if the Debian guys would be cool if I took their source modified it in a few subtle ways and then released it as "Debian." I could be wrong, but I doubt very much that they would be cool with it, because what I'd be distributing wouldn't be Debian and they'd have to deal with the consequences if things went wrong.

    6. Re:6 spinoffs by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The GPL is based around the notion that people using their code have to be forced to release it.

      Not people using, people redistributing.

      Minor nitpick.

    7. Re:6 spinoffs by rdebath · · Score: 3, Informative

      No definitely not. Debian do nothing wrong in respect of the GPL or other licenses. Unlike the FSF they don't write licenses and so it is in no respect hypocritical for them to class some licenses as incompatible with the project.

      The license grant for the Firefox name and branding is incompatible with the methods of the Debian project. For Debian stable the application code is frozen before a release is declared stable, the only changes allowed are direct bug fixes and security fixes. The license for the Firefox branding requires that only unmodified code is used to build the executables so that the firefox developers are not chasing bugs in other people's code that they don't have.

      Both of these stances are good and reasonable, but Debian will not accept 'the current build' of firefox into stable just to fix a minor bug and Mozilla will not allow a version with an unverified 'minor bug bug fix' to be branded 'Firefox'.

      Incompatible

      As for the name; neither Debian nor Mozilla care. The just want something that's not 'fire fox'; 'ice cat', 'ice dog', 'ice bear' ... all have Google hits.

  3. sigh by symbolset · · Score: 2

    Well, this is as good a place to put this as any. Both of you Windows Phone users need to stay away from the Chrome browser for Windows Phone. It's a scam.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  4. And none with a decent interface. by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The interface is what ruins Chrome, how come no one bothers to fix it? A good interface is consistent, internally and externally: the app must belong with the operating system around it. Chrome is alien in any system, it does not have the same window borders, menu bar, or anything else as every other app. That's tolerable from a tiny indie team, like jDownloader, but from a megacorporation like Google this is simply cringeworthy.

    1. Re:And none with a decent interface. by scialex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But OTOH it is consistently inconsistent. On any OS/platform you can be fairly certain that if you fire up chrome/chromium it will look almost exactly the same.
      Furthermore the fact is that chrome's ui is quickly becoming the standard browser ui. Both IE 9 and Firefox whatever the hell version they are at now look very similar to it.

    2. Re:And none with a decent interface. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2
      Chrome sacrifices operating-system paradigms to build Google's brand; you are meant to look at the shiny colors and think 'yay google! google google google.'.

      Operating-system-style widgets and the like make sense for users, but Google makes Chrome for the benefit of Google first and users second.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:And none with a decent interface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Chrome's interface is why I use it. It takes up less space and gets the bullshit out of my way. There is no reason to devote the entire top of my screen to the name of the application and the minimize, maximize, close buttons, when the only name I care about is the title of the website I'm currently looking at, and I have all these tabs I need to have displayed. Chromes interface makes sense

    4. Re:And none with a decent interface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The interface is what ruins Chrome, how come no one bothers to fix it? A good interface is consistent, internally and externally: the app must belong with the operating system around it. Chrome is alien in any system, it does not have the same window borders, menu bar, or anything else as every other app. That's tolerable from a tiny indie team, like jDownloader, but from a megacorporation like Google this is simply cringeworthy.

      Chrome ignoring the system's window decorations to build its own isn't just annoying, it's an accessibility and usability nightmare. If a user is disabled and needs, for example, larger close/minimise/etc buttons, Chrome's custom decorations still draw at their own size regardless of system setting. It also puts the window control buttons in the same place regardless of how your system is set up, so a user with motor control problems is going to be more likely to hit the wrong button by mistake due to the close placement and small size.. Since it ignores colour scheme, too, that means users that need high-contrast themes are screwed there, too.

      These problems are especially obvious in KDE, because Kwin allows you to change button placement and decoration size. Even for a user without disabilities, the fact that Chrome and Chromium completely override your settings and does what it wants is a usability killer. I have custom window decoration placement, size, and a dark theme, so Chromium is absolutely horrible to look at by default.

      Luckily, Chromium has two useful appearance options under the "Personal Stuff" section that mitigates this. You can choose "Use GTK+ theme" to get your system colours, and "Use system title bar and borders" to put your window manager back in control. No idea if it works in Windows, but it was a huge improvement for me in Debian.

    5. Re:And none with a decent interface. by MarkRose · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chrome's UI is not the most intuitive but I like how minimalistic it is, and how it saves the most amount of screen space for the actual task at hand: viewing web pages.

      --
      Be relentless!
    6. Re:And none with a decent interface. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      1. Pick any graphical browser. Any.
      2. Navigate to web page.
      3. Press F11. OMG ALL TEH BUTTONZ IZ GAWN!

      I use Chrome at work as it's fastest at rendering JS heavy content (ticketing and inventory system), Comodo Dragon and Firefox at home. Horses for courses.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:And none with a decent interface. by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      My screen is 1920x1080 and I definitely DO care.
      If you're using the internet for work, you might have the browser use only a small part of screenspace.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:And none with a decent interface. by Quarters · · Score: 2

      Why? Why is uniformity with every other random application a user might have installed considered the bellweather by which all interfaces should be judged? Is it because that's what they teach in school? Is it because of Apple's arguably outdated and internally inconsistent HIG? Personally I'd rather not have the same exact visual style on the interfaces for my 3d modelling package, video player, and word processor. Claiming they should all be identical is like saying the buttons on my alarm clock should exactly match the buttons (colors, fonts, shapes, materials, etc...) on my blender. Why would I need that? I've never been confused by the fact that my washing machine has a knob control and my diswasher doesn't. In the course of any day I'm using Chrome, 3ds Max, Eclipse, Visual Studio '10, Photoshop, and an internally developed game editor. Some have light color scheme UIs, some dark. Some have ribbons, some don't. None of them would be an app that you could point at and say "That follows Microsoft's look and feel to the letter"....not even Visual Studio 10. I have no problem using all of those apps. My head hasn't exploded. Expecting a bunch of disparate developers to follow the exact same rigid and authoritarian UI guidelines is madness. Make the UI that suits your application.

  5. Re:SRWare Iron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
  6. Re:SRWare Iron by blahbooboo · · Score: 2

    Wow, people are still falling for the SRWare scam???
    And what's wrong with the many adblock extensions available for Chrome??

  7. Customization by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The one thing that keeps me from switching to Chrome is the lack of customization. With Firefox I have the wonderful about:config, but Chrome has no such feature. Even basic settings like moving where the tabs are or fine-grained privacy settings are missing from Chrome and most Chrome derived browsers.

    Until Firefox somehow becomes totally unusable or Chrome actually lets me change basic settings, I'm sticking with Firefox.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  8. I just want a sensible UI by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2

    I would love Chrome if it had a status bar instead of a status popup that covers page elements and a URL bar that either shows the http or doesn't include it when you copy and paste the URL (what kind of moronic...).

    So, basically a browser that doesn't go out of its way to annoy me. Is there a version of Chrome like THAT?

  9. Propaganda in Dragon against domain-validated SSL by tepples · · Score: 2

    Page 3 reviews Comodo Dragon. What it doesn't mention is that if an HTTPS site uses a certificate that's domain validated, Dragon raises a warning "that the organization operating it may not have undergone trusted third-party validation that it is a legitimate business." Might this just be a way to threaten small-time webmasters, especially those who only started offering HTTPS to join EFF's HTTPS Everywhere initiative or to offer user accounts without running the risk of getting Firesheeped, into buying pricier EV certificates?

  10. Re:F-I-R-S-T by anonymov · · Score: 4, Informative

    Define "extra crap".

    Chrome, includes Flash and PDF plugins, no extra functionality, 82M installed.
    Mozilla, no Flash, no PDF, no extra functionality, 38M.
    Opera, no Flash, no PDF, built-in news reader/mail, URL-based adblocker and a bunch of other stuff commonly installed as extensions on FF/Chrome - fits it all in 35M

    Can you spell "b-l-o-a-t"?

  11. Iron? Really? by flimflammer · · Score: 2

    Iron is a known scam. If there is a reason to use Iron, it is not for its privacy related offerings. You're better off just using Chromium.

  12. Phishing Philter by tepples · · Score: 2

    Any site that I trust enough to visit, I trust enough to use their certs.

    How do you know whether you trust a site enough to visit it? The cert could be for PayPaI.com (capital i looks like lowercase L) or xn--itibank-xjg.com (appears as citibank.com, though using a C-shaped Cyrillic s). Comodo could explain this away as part of Dragon's phishing filter.

  13. Re:yeah, only a couple gigabytes by the+linux+geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    "bizarre perversions of the once innocent C language"

    You mean C++?

  14. Re:How big is SeaMonkey? by anonymov · · Score: 2

    Perhaps the closest comparison to Opera might be SeaMonkey because it has the built-in mail and news client. How big is SeaMonkey installed?

    42M. Unless I'm missing something, it doesn't include anything like AdBlock/FlashBlock/NoScript (Opera has URL filter and "load plugins on demand"/"enable Javascript" configurable on site-per-site basis out of the box)

    On the other hand, with Google Groups, Facebook, and the like, who uses NNTP for text newsgroups anymore? And with the shutdown of Usenet providers due to rampant copyright infringement in binary groups, who uses binary newsgroups anymore?

    Not me, for sure. So much "not me", in fact, that I forgot about NNTP (which Opera handles as well) and referred to RSS reader as "news reader".

    Facebook and Gmail have even been eating into the SMTP/IMAP market.

    Sure, that's question of preference. Some keep separate program, some are happy with browser tab, I find it convenient to have RSS and mail in browser's sidebar.

  15. It's going to take... by blahplusplus · · Score: 2

    ... more then just a browser to get people to change. I've often wondered why TOR developers don't integrate something like bit-torrent like protocol combined with an anonymity service like onion routing and a browser all in one, anyone who is using the browser and wants to keep their privacy automatically becomes part of an anonymity swarm instead of having separate packages just have it all integrated and take the end user out of the loop. For most people that will do. For the power users they can download custom stuff like what is available now.

    With all the bs going on with corporations owning the governments of the world and trying to take away peoples rights it's about time someone actually did something about it in terms of combining all the features into one complete package that grows more powerful/useful as people use it.

    1. Re:It's going to take... by Dwedit · · Score: 2

      Tried "Torbrowser"? It's a pack that lets you run a "Portable App" preconfigured custom build of Firefox Aurora 9, which automatically logs you into Tor before you use the browser. Really easy to use.

    2. Re:It's going to take... by blahplusplus · · Score: 2

      I'm thinking of something for the masses - the masses dont want hassle at all, they want something like chrome that just hides in the background and auto-updates without fuss. Tor still has 'barriers to entry' in terms of it's use. You have to download it, start it up, then you have to 'manually' turn on whether you become a node or not. For just private browsing that's still too many steps for the masses. You want to take all the decisions completely out of the loop and have custom stuff like you talk about for power users, even though it is 'simple' by our standards the point is to have a system default to being on without counting on the end user, since most are lazy/indifferent and hence it prevents things from becoming useful. Most people are stupid and I've learned over the years there is wisdom in taking them out of the loop for casual browsing.

    3. Re:It's going to take... by Dwedit · · Score: 2

      The "Torbrowser" package from eff.org I mentioned does not manually require starting Tor, you just run something called "Start Tor Browser.exe", and it does everything for you, you just run it and start browsing. No need to "Start up tor", or "manually turn on" anything. It's a separate profile from your main Firefox profile.
      But it doesn't auto-update. Some people think that's a privacy risk, so they exclude those kind of features.

      Vidalia still starts up in the background, but it shuts down when you close the browser.

  16. Outdated blog: Re:SRWare Iron by guidryp · · Score: 2

    First point:

    Just because there were only minor changes, doesn't make it a scam.

    Second point:

    This is based on some blog back when it was based on vers 5 of chrome sources. It is currently based on vers 16.. This is wildly out of date.

    I use Iron Portable ver 16 as a backup browser and it does exactly what it should. Installs nothing in your system, except in the install directory, doesn't call home like Googles version and is a perfectly good alternative browser.

    It is not a scam, because some outdated blog says so.

  17. Re:F-I-R-S-T by w0mprat · · Score: 2

    Define "extra crap".

    Chrome, includes Flash and PDF plugins, no extra functionality, 82M installed. Mozilla, no Flash, no PDF, no extra functionality, 38M. Opera, no Flash, no PDF, built-in news reader/mail, URL-based adblocker and a bunch of other stuff commonly installed as extensions on FF/Chrome - fits it all in 35M

    Can you spell "b-l-o-a-t"?

    Opera has Unite built in, which includes a web server, file sharing service, chat and other sharing collaboration tools. Opera has always been a excellent browser that is doomed to be forever underrated.

    Frankly I'm waiting for a browser with something like Diaspora built in.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  18. Re:F-I-R-S-T by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly, RockMelt is the most significant entrant on the list. #1 is Chromium, #2 is SRWare Iron (the legitimacy of which remains under debate), #6 is just Chrome itself (brilliant list-padding idea guys; include the official branch not once but twice to pad your pitifully short list), #3 is Comodo Dragon (dumb new UI + hardcoded DNS), and #5 is a Chinese thing that throws in the same old IE Mode and mouse gestures that we've seen a billion times everywhere else. There aren't six Chrome "remixes" out there, there are two.

    From now on I think all stories that start with a quantity of items being reviewed, or the fragment "top n", are going to be purged vehemently from my system with a bit of JS. Sad, sad, sad.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  19. Re:F-I-R-S-T by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well as someone who uses Comodo Dragon what extra crap are you referring to? The " send everything to Google" stuff being removed, or the completely optional Comodo Secure DNS (which i've found blocks most phishing and malware sites) which is not only changeable at install but can be toggled on and off with a checkbox? Or the single button that lets you use Comodo site inspector to check a site's malware history, again a single checkbox to remove? that extra?

    if you care about security and privacy i urge to to read TFA and give the Dragon a try, its fast, has some really nice completely optional security features, can be installed standalone or on a thumbstick, and with each release frankly its gotten better both in performance and security. With the Dragon and Avast free just for shits and giggles i tried to get a machine i was gonna wipe anyway infected, threw every 'look at teh tittiez!" and 'get a free iPad!" topsite and crapsite i could find at it and between the two everything was stopped cold. i did a half a dozen offline and online scans and nothing, zero zip nada squat, which is good enough of a result i've switched my entire family to the Dragon with Avast and haven't had a single call, it all 'just works" smooth as butter. give it a try, its free and the standalone won't even mess with Chrome if that is your main browser so what have you got to lose?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  20. Re:Oh boy! by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Informative

    IE9. Microsoft has matured with its browser from the medieval times of IE5.

    Speaking as an end-user; no, it hasn't.
    Speaking as a web developer; no, it hasn't.

    Use Firefox, Opera, Safari or Chrome. Not IE in any version.
    Not yet anyway, IE9 is far better than previous IE's, so I've got some hope for IE10.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  21. Re:SRWare Iron by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

    They don't work like AdBlock on Firefox. Ads aren't displayed, but the servers are still contacted.

    I pipe all my browsing through Privoxy. Regardless of browser, I don't see any adverts.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  22. Re:F-I-R-S-T by DrXym · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Every browser requires:
    1. CSS parser & rules engine
    2. JS parser & engine
    3. HTML, XHTML & XML parsers
    4. DOM
    5. Network handlers for ftp, http, https
    6. Encryption APIs for SSL/TLS
    7. A layout & compositing engine
    8. Plugin framework
    9. Zlib
    10. Password manager
    11. Cookie manager
    12. Cache manager
    13. Jpeg, Png, Gif decoders
    14. All the user interface functionality & resources that wraps the above and turns it into a browser - navigation bar, bookmarks, download manager, print preview, extensions etc

    And some browsers also include pack-in:

    1. An updater
    2. Portable runtime API
    3. Dictionaries for spelling correction
    4. MathML / SVG support
    5. Video and audio codecs
    6. Accessibility
    7. WebGL
    8. Development tools like DOM inspector
    9. Crash reporting & feedback
    10. Incognito / Privacy mode
    11. Malware / trojan site checks

    It doesn't seem unreasonable browsers require 30-50MB footprint to supply all this and I'm not sure why anyone be splitting hairs over the difference.

  23. Re:F-I-R-S-T by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

    Obvious bullshit is obvious. I take it you've never actually TRIED dragon because there ain't jack shit "hard coded', not the DNS or anything else. not only can you simply uncheck a box at install (or if you are placing it as a standalone or thumbdrive install) but at ANY time turning off the DNS is as easy as options>under the hood> uncheck the little box. Rockmelt is just a Chromium ripoff of Flock which also bombed hard, its not like one needs a special browser to visit FB. Oh if you like that sort of thing there is the option to have a FB button in dragon but again like everything else its one checkbox away from going bye bye.

    Now as for SWIron its okay but personally if i wanted a standalone and wasn't gonna use Comodo i'd use QTWeb as its Webkit engine seems to play nicer with thumbdrives and it has tons of privacy features which help to leave no traces or read/write to the stick a lot. Chrome just has too much phone home for my taste, if i want to let Google have my search that's one thing but they shouldn't get squat when i'm using Yahoo.

    Personally though i frankly don't see why you're bitching, never before have we had so many GOOD browsers to choose from, we literally have a feast of choices for our browsing. We have Gecko, webkit, chromium, presto and trident, and variations galore to fit every little niche. I like Dragon, my mom likes Seamonkey, my oldest has been a die hard Opera user for years, my youngest was FF for ages but decided that he liked the speed of the Dragon better, on my netbook I have a Webkit based in expressgate and QTWeb and dragon, man having choices is good, having all these free browsers that run well is good. So instead of bitching why don't you actually try the ones on TFA? They're free and who knows, you might find yourself a new browser.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  24. Re:Comodo Dragon by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

    Well I've always thought Comodo made some really solid products. While i prefer avast for my home users for businesses you really can't beat Comodo Internet Security, they let small businesses use it free and it has really top notch AV and firewall controls. Frankly i soured on Google when they started spamming first the toolbar and then Chrome with freeware, i feel if you make a good product you shouldn't HAVE to spam and the fact Google has become far worse than Sun and MSFT ever were when it comes to spamming freeware with Chrome makes me leery of going anywhere near it and their recent announcement of tying everything together just makes me more so.

    Comodo has made a few mistakes in the past but were quick to announce them and send out revocations for the affected certs and in every test I've seen Comodo security software is always in the top 5 so that's good enough for me and my customers. Plus they love the speed, I put Comodo Secure DNS on as default in the browser and frankly their DNS is fast fast fast, much faster than the local ISPs. Every customer i give the Dragon to always ends up telling me how much faster their browsing is now and want me to send them links so they can send their friends the links to Comodo and ABP. so far knock on plastic every customer I've given Comodo dragon along with Comodo IS or Avast free has been 100% malware free so that is all i need to know, its really good at killing phishing sites and stopping malware sites from loading and when you are talking about home users every extra bit of protection helps.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  25. Re:Sadly by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    The world can ding Firefox all it wants. Yes. I too have the endless memory leakage.

    Nothing else can be as ng.significantly customised for my utility and privacy. Nothing.

    Nor does anything else manage tabs as elegantly. Yes, I'm the person with 30-80 in a session, and cull them over weeks. It beats any "bookmarks". :-)

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."