Slashdot Mirror


New Privacy Laws Could Boost EU Cloud Industry

sweetpea86 writes "Cloud providers based in the European market could turn the fear, uncertainty and doubt around data protection and the U.S. Patriot Act to their advantage, according to Andy Burton, chairman of the Cloud Industry Forum. The only way that European companies can absolutely guarantee that their data doesn't end up in the hands of U.S. authorities is by choosing a provider that not only has a data centre within their jurisdiction, but is also owned by an organisation based in that jurisdiction."

28 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. But which places are... by TheFoxMan88 · · Score: 2

    considered a safe harbour from the US Patriot Act?

    1. Re:But which places are... by rmstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "This is unlikely to be an issue in reality unless youâ(TM)re involved in anything dodgy."

      If your company's not a front for terrorism, the Patriot Act shouldn't matter to it.

      It must be a nice place in your brain, with little pony and the teletubbies. I mean, do you really believe that?

      The Patriot Act has a beautiful record of being abused for all sorts of purposes.

    2. Re:But which places are... by fuzzytv · · Score: 2

      And lot of that FUD is true. There are many reports on the net, describing how the Patriot Act is misused even in cases that are not related to terorism. It's much easier that regular subpoenas etc. so they misuse it.

    3. Re:But which places are... by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless they are old and sick, sheep shouldn't worry about getting eaten by wolves.

      Unfortunately the definition of 'terrorism' has been stretched in recent years. Once you are accused it's nearly impossible to clear your name.

    4. Re:But which places are... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if you're not a crook, why would you wanna hide anything?

      Face it, the terrorists won. What did they hate us for? Our liberty and freedom? Ok, we caved in and eliminated both.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:But which places are... by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stay away from the UK, Canada, Australia ect. via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK–USA_Security_Agreement
      Stay away from anywhere the UK/US has had bases "British Bases in Cyprus and Signals Intelligence" e.g. http://cryptome.org/2012/01/0060.pdf
      Stay away from anywhere that has cheap telco peering loops to the USA thats going to save you lots .....
      Your down to failed states, theocracies, Kingdoms, disputed zones with expensive telcos, changing local laws, taxes, gifts and investors fine print.
      If you upset the USA, most of the EU has friends willing to help with some form of rendition.
      Enjoy classified charges, no lawyer to evaluate or challenge the evidence.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:But which places are... by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Snuggly the Security Bear for the little pony and the teletubbies generation.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-34Iyz7EYk
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybyHW3PK0nQ
      More at http://www.markfiore.com/snuggly_0

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:But which places are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > What did they hate us for? Our liberty and freedom?

      I suspect they hate you for messing with their countries over and over again. They probably don't give a fuck about your 'liberty and freedom'.

    8. Re:But which places are... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You misspelled "Jesus" and "Christians." Oh, you weren't talking about the last thousand years of Christianity (up until maybe 150 years ago). My mistake.

    9. Re:But which places are... by Slashdot+Assistant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, the Islamists are perfectly happy to let us enjoy our lives, so long as we leave them alone. You're somewhat underestimating the Muslim capacity for butthurt and completely unjustified notions of superiority. The only way that Islamists will be content is when we either adopt Islam or agree to live under its rule. Even then, which version of Islam? Muslims have a rich tradition of killing Muslims who belong to different sects.

      The Danes have a long history of charity and are hardly known for militarily throwing their weight around in the middle east, yet a few simple cartoons was enough to cause the Muslim world to erupt in to riots and the issuing of death threats. We can no more find accommodation with Islamists than we would be able to with 14th century Christians. Muslims will demand too much, and offer little in return. These are the people who happily see anti-semitic cartoons in their newspapers, yet will demand death for someone who'd poke fun at a dead schizophrenic with a hard-on for little girls. How about the "God bless Hitler" sign, and similar, that were being held by angry Muslims? Religion of peace, my arse.

      There is no compromising with this mentality. We cannot reason with it, and we certainly cannot make it happy enough to leave us alone. Either we face it down, and preserver or values, or we allow these repressed bigots to impose theirs on us.

    10. Re:But which places are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suggest you try replacing "Muslims" with "Christians" in your first paragraph.

      Works perfectly, doesn't it?

      You are confusing the extremist, fundamentalist mulsim with the mulsim-in-the-street.

      Some of my best friends are Christians; but then they are not Pat Robertson, or Jimmy Swaggart, or Michelle Bachman.

      And remind me once again what Ann Coulter said after 9/11...

    11. Re:But which places are... by thsths · · Score: 2

      > And if you're not a crook, why would you wanna hide anything?

      - because you have business secrets
      - because you want to stay ahead of US competition
      - because you work with confidential data
      - because you do something that is perfectly legal, but maybe not appreciated by the US government
      - because you not everybody respects the law

      I guess your house has no doors, you never wear cloth, and your walls are made from glass? And you tell everybody your password?

  2. Re:Agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Parent's Link is a virus. Do not click it.

  3. Ha! by guises · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See? See?!? Responsible, consumer-friendly legislation doesn't have to be anti-business.

    We've got this thing in my country with the one political party saying that they're pro-consumer and trying to push laws that limit corporate abuses, and the other party saying that they're pro-business and trying to squash anything that would reduce corporate size and influence with the claim that it's necessary for jobs, the economy, etc. Well bullshit. Some consumer-friendly legislation may be anti-established business, but that's not a negative, just thinning the herd. Get rid of the sick and bring on the new.

  4. Our MS vs Google fight by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My employer (a university) decided to outsource the e-mail-facilities for students. Microsoft and Google both made compelling offers, however Google could not promise that our data would never leave Europe. Microsoft did make that promise and was awarded the contract because of it.
    A few months later MS had to confess that they couldn't keep that promiss. As the migration was not going smooth at all we are now back talking with Google.

    1. Re:Our MS vs Google fight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your employer trusted Microsoft on this?
      Bruhaha!

    2. Re:Our MS vs Google fight by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      let me get this straight: a university, a WEALTH of intelligent and skilled people (many with lots of time on their hands) outsources an extremely easy to manage service and also one that has high risk of being abused by the outsourced company?

      you value your data that little? you value privacy that little? you value your own people that little?

      what place is that? I'd like to know so I can tell people NOT TO GO THERE.

      lazy assholes. sheesh! pisses me off. wealth of brainpower but too fucking lazy to install and manage sendmail, qmail, or whatever.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  5. My Little Pony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My Little Pony is actually a near-future post apocalyptic work, where the ponies have built their civilization on the ash and bones of the extinct human race.
    They may look cute, but they have mobile armour and howitzers. It's pretty hard-core stuff.

  6. Re:Names Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Company in the EU is safe from the US Gov. End of.
    The US has laws that extend ALL US laws into every country in the world. They will use this to come after you if they even have the smallest suspicion that ther might just possibly mabe pehaps be something related to piracy, terrorism, child porn, anti US sentiments somewhere in your data.
    Then it will be up to your government to tell the US what they can do with their extradition request. Mostly, they will roll over and let them take you.
    The US also has laws where you can be held indefinitely without trial, charge or even access to a lawyer.

    If you choose to go with a company that just happens to be a local subsidiary of a US company OR have a US subsidiat itself, they can wealk in without a warrant and take your data.

    Where are you going for your hosting now?
     

  7. The only private cloud... by PSVMOrnot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only truly private cloud is the one you own, manage and host yourself. For most users this is of course not feasible; they lack the knowledge, time and inclination to set one up. For us tech types however it's getting to the feasible stage.

    We have all seen the news about the Raspberry Pi, a dirt cheap mini computer that can run on a handful of AA batterys. Take a linux distro of your choice which runs on the Raspberry Pi, add some lovely open source software like Zarafa, sprinkle lightly with a dynamic DNS and bake for however long you want in a cool Raspberry Pi. Serves an entire household (or more).

    For that extra security flavour you can garnish with an OpenVPN connection, and deny all other incomming traffic.

    Et voila! Mobile, web accessable email, contacts and calendar (plus whatever else you want to set up on there) with the data being on your machine and in your control.

  8. Re:Names Please? by UBfusion · · Score: 2

    Enough with this anti-"US law" crap... It's not a matter of the US laws but of the international treaties signed between US and its allies. No country dares to deny signing such treaties, because US has its ways.

  9. ACTA anyone? by idbeholda · · Score: 2

    I highly doubt the above statement, given this...

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-signs-global-internet-treaty-worse-than-sopa.html

    It won't really matter where the servers are in a particular jurisdiction, if your country has signed the Anti-Counterfitting Trade Act, you're pretty much screwed. So much for turning fear and uncertainty into an economic boon.

  10. New service? by qbast · · Score: 2

    I wonder how successful would be a company providing data storage service like Dropbox, but with guaranteed data security. I mean that all encryption would be done by client software (with source code provided so everyone can verify that) and no keys or unencrypted data would be ever transmitted to company's servers. In this case complying with warrants and subpoenas would be no problem - here is all we have, have fun decrypting.

    1. Re:New service? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      I wonder how successful would be a company providing data storage service like Dropbox, but with guaranteed data security. I mean that all encryption would be done by client software (with source code provided so everyone can verify that) and no keys or unencrypted data would be ever transmitted to company's servers. In this case complying with warrants and subpoenas would be no problem - here is all we have, have fun decrypting.

      All a court will do is compel the owner to provide the keys to allow decryption. There's a case right now where a judge has down just that; I hope it will go to SCOTUS who will squash it but that's not a sure bet. If you refuse, it's contempt of court and jail time until you comply.

      Personally, I think you should be able to plead the fifth and not be compelled to decrypt; but until SCOTUS decides the law is unclear in the US.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:New service? by fa2k · · Score: 2

      I wonder how successful would be a company providing data storage service like Dropbox, but with guaranteed data security.

      There are several companies like that: http://www.wuala.com/ , https://spideroak.com/ , http://www.swissdisk.com/. They are doing OK, I believe, but don't have the hype of Dropbox. They don't have to say they guarantee the security because only the user has the keys (which is the best guarantee possible).

    3. Re:New service? by Raumkraut · · Score: 2

      My interpretation, as a non-lawyer:

      If the key (password) is only in your head, then supplying it is an admission of ownership or knowledge of the contents of a private "digital safe" - ie. self-incrimination.

      Handing over the key to a physical safe is an admission only that you had the key.

  11. Re:China, Russia, Venezuela ... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not all nations in this world kow tow to the mighty Uncle Sam, you know?

    True, but the notion there is anyplace that can fully guarantee data does not end up in the hands of the US (or any other country, for that manner) is naive. Each of these countries ha their own self interest at heart, and if the US (or some other country) wants their help doing something they just need to come up with a compelling reason for them to help. Governments also change, as do a nations goals and interests.

    The bottom line is, once you cede control of your data to third party, you lose the ability to ensure it will never get passed on to someone's. Or,a s the saying goes, two people can keep a secret only if one of them is dead.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  12. Face the fact by devent · · Score: 2

    Except where a agreement exists in which the EU must give the USA authorities access to the data if it's about terrorism (or whatever), like with the bank transactions. Like the Swift agreement between the EU and the USA. It's an open secret that in order to spy on the citizens the USA and the EU have agreements of data sharing. Because of strict privacy laws in the EU they just agree to share the data with the USA, so the USA can see the data and tell the EU everything in order to fight terrorism (or whatever).

    Face the fact: if you put your data in the cloud, the goverment have it. There is no way around it.

    --
    http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute