Indian Engineers Modify Kinect To Help the Blind Walk With Confidence
New submitter albinobee writes "The Kinect for Xbox 360 isn't only about gaming; it can also be used to help compensate for impaired vision, as a team of Indian engineers is working to prove. A device called viSparsh, still in its nascent stage, is a motion sensing belt that can help alert the blind to obstacles that lie in their path."
The more I hear about Kinect the more it makes it seem like one of the more revolutionary products that Microsoft has ever come out with...
Well done to the team who worked on this project. I love hearing about positive contributions like this.
beings that the Kinect uses unmodulated IR, sunlight will completely wash out the dim IR coming from the Kinect.
I personally think it's bullshit to even mention the nationality of the engineers in the headline and the article summary.
Microsoft has finally embraced and extended the term crash!
Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
Because it tells you their nationality.
First line in TFA
New Delhi: Mohammed Wasim is a young helpline operator at India's National Association for the Blind [...]
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
I don't think there would have been any complaints if the story read "a team of German engineers have...".
I like what you did there but surely you can't be satisfied with "Engineers modify Kinect to help the blind walk with confidence"? First of all, there is a lot of redundancy over there! In the context, it's obvious that people are "engineering" something so specifying "engineers" is redundant. We could substitute it with "People" but it's also obvious that people are doing the modification, so we arrive at "Kinect modified to help the blind walk with confidence".
Now that we're done with the redundancy, we still have a lot of problems left. First of all "walk with confidence"? That's accomplished by personal charisma or perhaps some drugs. Uninformative expression. Also "the Blind"? Surely that's too specific as exact same method should be applicable to any sightless thing, such as robots. Let's try "Modified Kinect - A limited substitute for sight?".
Obivously, we're just a few steps away from determining that headline is "Visual sensors can be used to substitute visual sensors", at which point we can completely eliminate the 100% redundant headline and go with a empty string.
That's a pretty long distance grab for the rascist card there. Is it really not interesting to you to know where people come from? We do not all belong to one homogenous mass of humans. We come from different cultures and different countries with different priorities and backgrounds. I think it is interesting to know what research is being done in different parts of the globe - especially when it is such a positive story as this.
And the third paragraph: "developing viSparsh under technical guidance of professor Rahul Mangharam of the University of Pennsylvania". So maybe Penn is more important than Indian? It's not clear from the article where they're located, I think it would be more relevant if they had said "Engineers in India" or "Engineers in Philadelphia" rather than their nationality.
There was an ultrasound torch developed 20-30 years ago, for helping blind people navigate. It was designed to help people find objects, and give different sounds for different objects (tree, hard wall etc.). It wasn't successful, but some people did use it. They spoke to the blind people who did use it, and found that they were using it to find gaps, not to find objects. The design might have been different if it had been optimised for finding gaps.
At the 39 second mark, was that guy using a using a mac?
Why is this post about engineers, when they are just people?
Project Natal was developed at Microsoft Research Cambridg: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=microsoft-project-natal
Microsoft used an Israeli company to develop the actual product hardware. This may be the reason why someone could think that MS just "bought" the entire product. Or it could be an opportunity for ./ MS haters to create a myth that MS cannot innovate.
But this was a MSR project all along.
Reading slashdot one-liner: (irm http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot).rdf.item | fl title,desc*
A nice change from developed at Quanta in Taiwan and "the fabrication will be done in China".
;)
Unless of course it will be done in the US in dangerous sweatshops...
They bought it from a company called 3DV Systems. It was then called the ZCam (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZCam).
Indeed. While they have improved the camera, the IR seem about the same.
http://support.xbox.com/en-GB/kinect/setup-and-playspace/lighting
http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2012/01/microsoft-bets-big-on-kinect-for-windows-but-splits-its-community.ars
Kinect is uneffective in daylight. They have to use a custom built kinect variant in order to get the infra camera to sense the projected dots in sunshine. The sun is quite a rival as source of infra light :)
It also have hard time detecting shiny surfaces. The dangerous objects and situations make a fine list for the users :)
In other words, 'Indian jobs being outsourced to the US'?
Horses and buggies were also better and more reliable than the earliest automobiles. I understand the point you're making. High tech isn't a solution for everything, but stuff like this is worth a shot at the R&D stage. You're never really sure that you can't improve a technology until you give it a try.
Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
Even the most rudimentary automobiles displayed potential advantages over using horses -- longer range, higher payload capacity, higher sustained speeds, and so on. In all of the descriptions of this Kinect hack, I don't hear any description of the potential advantages over using a cane. The only advantage I can think of is it avoids the strong negative social stigma attached to using a cane. If the only problem with canes is social stigma, a social remedy would be much more appropriate and effective than a technological remedy.