Slashdot Mirror


HDD Price Update: How the Thai Floods Have Affected Prices, 3 Months Later

New submitter jjslash writes "The hard disk drive supply chain was hit hard late last year when a series of floods struck Thailand. The Asian country accounts for about a quarter of the world's hard drive production, but thousands of factories had to close shop for weeks as facilities were under water, in what is considered the world's fourth costliest natural disaster according to World Bank estimates. That's on top of the human cost of over 800 lives. TechSpot has monitored a number of mobile and desktop HDDs to get a better overview of how the situation has developed in the last three months."

220 comments

  1. Why the "but"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the Asian country accounts for about a quarter of the world's hard drive production, but thousands of factories had to close shop for weeks as facilities

    "and" would be better as "but" implies that there's some sort of twist.

    1. Re:Why the "but"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The AC was correct; why are you being belligerent?

      Copy-editing is a legitimate job, and the need for more copy-editors is made clear by the prevalence of obvious grammatical errors in major publications. The trouble with being a copy-editor is that your employment depends on the ability of others to admit their faults; people like you illustrate why any form of employment which relies on honest self-reflection is doomed.

    2. Re:Why the "but"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it is not a mistake here. They are not really doing about 1/4 of the production when the factories are closed, thus making "but" maybe not best style but correct and probably better than "and".
      The only really good style would probably have been to completely rework the sentence to something like "With it accounting for 1/4..., the thousands of factories that had to close had a major impact..." - well, at least it would be better style if someone with better language skills than me wrote it.

    3. Re:Why the "but"? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well if they only counted for 1/4th of the production and the price is marked up over 100% I think an investigation is in order because i smell price gouging. while it is to be expected they'd make the consumers pay the cost of fixing the factories 100%-200% over the original price (which they certainly weren't losing money on) makes me smell a little collusion and price fixing. After all if there wasn't any price fixing one company could undercut the others and pretty much own the market, especially with the OEMs. Now that is BIG business and BIG profits so the fact they are ALL setting at almost identical prices? yeah i smell a rat.

      But I would like to give a big shout out to Samsung because while i fricking hate the fact they sold their HDD business along with Hitachi because those were my big two go to brands, especially for business and industrial, because they sold out when they did for once in my fricking life i was ahead of the curve and not behind! when i heard they were quitting I bought Samsung ecodrives at $35 for a Tb and $59 for 2Tb and made a nice bit of cash and still had enough drives to make sure i could wait this mess out. I got burnt on DVD, paying $200 for a drive that 6 months later was less than $60, got burnt on my last Intel CPU when i paid too much only to have them abandon the socket and leave me with no upgrade path, but for once i actually came out ahead of the curve, thanks Samsung!

      BTW if you need a big drive even at the higher prices i can recommend the Samsung Ecodrive most heartily. I've used them on factory floors and in construction shacks where they get horribly abused and they just come back for more, and any you find on the market in those sizes will be from the last two batches which were particularly good. with that nice fat 32mb of cache I went from a bench of 93 on a Seagate 7200 RPM with 8Mb of cache to nearly 140 on the 1Tb Ecodrive, fast enough i'm using the Eco as a boot drive on all my machines as well as storage and I can tell a difference in the speed thanks to the bigger cache. Oh and the temps made a HUGE drop, from 121-128F under load for the Seagate to a max 98f under load and an idle temp of just 82f compared to nearly 100f for the Seagate. damned shame there won't be any more but sitting on 6Tb I think I can afford to just let this whole mess go on by, thanks again Samsung!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Why the "but"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well if they only counted for 1/4th of the production and the price is marked up over 100% I think an investigation is in order because i smell price gouging.

      What you should investigate is this concept called price elasticity of demand: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_elasticity_of_demand
      http://www.khanacademy.org/video/price-elasticity-of-demand?topic=microeconomics
      Once you've understood that, you also have to realize they still have to pay the wages of many staff, plus other overheads (interest on loans from banks) despite the X% drop in sales.

      Before this disaster hard drive manufacturers were NOT making a lot of money from each hard drive they sell - tell me in which other industry could you buy a device with high tech, high precision, high speed moving parts with rare earth metals, that can operate nonstop, spinning at 7200 rpm for a few years with zero maintenance- no lube changes, no adjustments, with a three year warranty, for USD60 or less?

      Now because of the shortage prices went up, there were fewer drives to go around, so to try to make as much money to pay for their costs (or not lose so much money) they charged higher. But charging higher means fewer customers will be willing to pay the higher prices. So the rest of the customers who REALLY NEED those drives and are the only ones willing to buy will have to pay even more. Or maybe decide they don't really need those drives that much. So the hard drive sellers and buyers will have to see who blinks first. If enough buyers blink and buy, then the price stays high.

      That's how it works, you'd do the same thing too if you wanted to stay in business.

      As for me, I'm playing my part by not buying yet... I might save up to buy an SSD instead ;).

    5. Re:Why the "but"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well if they only counted for 1/4th of the production and the price is marked up over 100% I think an investigation is in order because i smell price gouging.

      What I'm detecting from your direction whiffs more like complete economic ignorance.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Why the "but"? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2
      Also wrong. Price is determined by what buyers will pay. Buyers don't care what your costs are.

      Some buyers need drives more than others. Some buyers are willing to pay more. That's always true. So when there are suddenly fewer drives to sell they get sold to the buyers willing to pay more. That's why the prices went up. That's why prices always go up when there's suddenly less supply. Nobody cares about your costs.

    7. Re:Why the "but"? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And I'm smelling an ignorant asshole, but to be fair that and nerd funk are common stenches at slashdot. What you and your "Herp derp we took an economics class once so now we are Milton Friedman herp derp" are missing is that if there is no collusion all it would take is one saying "I'll undercut the others and corner the OEMs!" to make out like a fucking robber baron. do you have ANY idea how many drives someone like HP or Dell goes through? that is a hell of a lot of money and one company could undercut the others and walk away with it all for themselves.

      But as we saw with BOTH LCD AND RAM that price fixing is quite prevalent in this business and I'm sure they've made it clear to each other that if they don't follow the script the third parties that they all buy supplies off of just won't sell to them no more. if you read the transcripts from the previous two cases instead of thinking a single economics class (was it home economics?) makes you an expert you'd know that is how it worked last time and how they were able to set price floors in both RAM and LCDs across the board for years.

      So why not look at the actual history of the industry in question instead of giving us all some economics hand wank? Tell me does your supposed economics powers explain not one but two major scandals in the same sector in recent years? But what can we expect from just another perception bubble, thinking that some class he took a decade ago holds all the answers while ignoring evidence sitting right in front of him. Politicians love those like you that walk around with blinders, i believe they are called sheeple.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Why the "but"? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you and your "Herp derp we took an economics class once so now we are Milton Friedman herp derp" are missing is that if there is no collusion all it would take is one saying "I'll undercut the others and corner the OEMs!" to make out like a fucking robber baron.

      That can only happen if any one of the manufacturers produced enough to supply all the OEM needs.

      And there's not a lot of evidence of that.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Why the "but"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Price is determined by what the buyers will pay AND what the sellers will sell for.

      The sellers certainly care about their costs. So if their costs go up, they're certainly going to try to push the prices up.

    10. Re:Why the "but"? by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Long story short there's not that much soft demand in the market, those of us who'll move an old disk or have more disks in one machine are a small minority, assuming people have an old machine to pick from. By far most people, not only in the OEM market but also in the spot market want to buy complete PCs with an preinstalled OS and whatnot, which you can't do without a HDD. The price of the HDD almost doesn't matter because if they can't get HDDs, they're stuck with inventory of CPUs and GPUs and memory and everything else that loses value and they're not making any sales. So when supply is cut short and demand is very resistant to change the price goes up a lot, personally I got lucky but not so lucky that I'd want to sell anything back into the market, just keeping them for my own use until the prices are back to pre-crisis levels.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Why the "but"? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well if they only counted for 1/4th of the production and the price is marked up over 100% I think an investigation is in order because i smell price gouging.

      They also account for 90+% of the production of some components used in HDD's which has been a bigger problem, the other 75% of wordwide capacity has been hamstrung from lack of parts.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Why the "but"? by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      "BTW if you need a big drive even at the higher prices i can recommend the Samsung Ecodrive most heartily." The day after the flood, bought four of these, just as they were raising the prices at best buy. ++Samsung, +++Ecodrive --Best Buy.

    13. Re:Why the "but"? by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      Bought TWO ssd drives for $60, and raided them. Probably wont last, but so what?

    14. Re:Why the "but"? by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      Mod parent +1 Interesting

      "they're stuck with inventory of CPUs and GPUs and memory and everything else that loses value and they're not making any sales."

      Obvious, and thanks for pointing that out. What its not obvious is that this impacts most OEMs with major sales, and small inventories, ( the one with large inventories in a climbing market get to raise their price also, but keep the $profit$ from the rising prices ), that they have to raise their prices immediately, and look at the market.

      Thanks!

    15. Re:Why the "but"? by pgn674 · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like they're saying that Thailand normally provides 1/4, but with the factories closed, it temporarily supplied less. If that's the case, then the "but" makes sense in that context, with some implications sprinkled in.

    16. Re:Why the "but"? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      They can push all they like, but if people won't pay, they won't pay. In a competitive market buyers are always the ultimate determinant of the price. It can be no other way. Raising prices always reduces aggregate demand.

      In any large pool of buyers there are some who are willing to pay more than others, and some who would only pay less. Sellers would love to somehow tier their prices so that those who are willing pay more, but without losing the rest of the buyers. It's because of the large middle that prices normally do not rise to the levels the upper tier is willing to pay. But when there is a sudden reduction in the supply, and the large middle simply cannot be served, that prices naturally and quickly rise to the level the upper tier is willing to pay.

  2. Looks like it's getting better... by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NewEgg is actually having sales on something besides "recertfied" drives.

    1. Re:Looks like it's getting better... by Antidamage · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's about buying smart. Instead of buying recertified drives, go for drives that really like the water like Barracudas and Caviar.

    2. Re:Looks like it's getting better... by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I buy one of those two models my data will be eaten alive, and boy will I have egg on my face then.

    3. Re:Looks like it's getting better... by leathered · · Score: 4, Funny

      So I suppose a Quantum Fireball is out of the question then?

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    4. Re:Looks like it's getting better... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Then if you want killer performance, buy a Deskstar.

      Of course, they'll self-destruct due to some sort of internal defect and scatter your data across the platters.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  3. Fear economics by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is what we are dealing with. From HDs to gas prices.

    1. Re:Fear economics by boombaard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but this is imply bullshit. What we are dealing with is not "fear economics", but with the consequences of overemphasizing efficiency over resilience and/or robustness. And at the root of that is that that is what economic "thinking" teaches economic actors to do.

    2. Re:Fear economics by boombaard · · Score: 1

      Meant to type: "I'm sorry, but this is simplistic nonsense (that gets you +4/5 insightful...). What we are dealing with is not "fear economics", but "bad economics". That is, what we are dealing with are the consequences of the fact that all the players are overemphasizing efficiency at the cost of resilience and/or robustness. And the reason they do that is because that is what economic "thinking" teaches everyone to do."

    3. Re:Fear economics by dkf · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but this is imply bullshit. What we are dealing with is not "fear economics", but with the consequences of overemphasizing efficiency over resilience and/or robustness. And at the root of that is that that is what economic "thinking" teaches economic actors to do.

      Economics will merrily quantify the level of risk associated with a decision (possibly wrongly; this is an area of current research as it is becoming clear that the simple models previously used were thoroughly bogus) but it won't tell you what the decision should actually be. Nor will professional management practice. Alas, lots of people think that they do and that they have to optimize the system (or their part of it) under the assumption that everything is working perfectly. This is stupid, but all too common.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Fear economics by cornjones · · Score: 1

      it isn't 'bad' economics unless we lost more during the rebuild time than we saved by not having overbuilt...

    5. Re:Fear economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with letting bean-counters run things is that only the beans that they can see count. That wasn't so bad, perhaps, when even the largest factories were relatively small and numerous, but we've spent about a century finding ways to pare things down to their absolute limits.

      Any good engineer knows that you need to factor in a reserve. 90% of the time, it's "inefficient". The other 10%, it's critical. Lives can depend on it.

      But the Numbers People don't see it that way. Not only do they not allow for extremes, they use advanced computational systems to "cherry pick" and "lemon drop" until everything is thinner than a razor. All in the name of large short-term returns.

      Personally, I prefer my investments to grow a little more slowly and more dependably over the "Jim Morrison" approach to building wealth. I intend to be around long enough to enjoy them.

    6. Re:Fear economics by Jaqenn · · Score: 1

      It's a tangent, but there's a good article on 2008 rice prices freaking out because of the same effect: http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2011/11/02/141771712/how-fear-drove-world-rice-markets-insane

      Short version is that in a normal environment there is enough rice produced for everyone, but suddenly everyone worries that RIGHT NOW they need to buy all the rice they will eat ALL YEAR, and that causes problems.

      The solution was really interesting too. Turns out that Japan artificially insulates it's rice farmers from foreign competition, but to satisfy world trade agreements they buy lots of rice that sits in warehouses and rots. People started negotiations to re-export that rice to countries with a shortfall, and as soon as the word got around that this might happen people went back to normal buying behavior and the problem evaporated without actually moving anything around.

      --
      You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    7. Re:Fear economics by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That depends: who is "we"? We, the buyer or we, the seller? It seems today's economists completely ignore the buyer.

      Do economists do scientific studies? I don't see how they could. Economics is no more scientific than Aristotle, or you wouldn't have such stupidities as "trickle down economics".

    8. Re:Fear economics by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      bad economics leads to fear economics. They are creating a false sense of fear by creating a real world model of reducing storage of product in case of catastrophe.
      Arbitrary inflation through futures (fear mongering economics) is the ultimate outcome of your "bad economics".

    9. Re:Fear economics by therefore · · Score: 1

      For the buyer, the equivalent question would be: Are the cost savings of purchasing cheaper disk drives due to efficiency more than offset by the cost premium during the rebuild. This is less an economics question than an accounting one. What time frame would be used for comparison? Say the prices will come down to pre-flood levels by October 2012, a one year period, as expected. Say the total extra purchase costs to the buyers (which will be roughly correlated to the losses plus rebuild of the manufacturers) is X dollars for that one year. Say, also, that the aggregate savings for one year between an overbuilt but resilient industry vs. a more efficient, compact one is Y. If Y > X, then a good deal. But in actuality, the efficiencies have gone on for years. So, if the disk drive industry has been efficient for (say) 5 years, then the question would be: is 5 * Y > X (all calculated to present value, naturally)? If yes, again, a good deal. I don't have the answers but I can guarantee that this is being analyzed to determine whether it would be more cost effective to be geographically spread out.

    10. Re:Fear economics by boombaard · · Score: 1

      That is only true if you assume that it is no problem that the supply is interrupted in the meantime.. And there is no good way to quantify the "cost" of interrupted access.

    11. Re:Fear economics by boombaard · · Score: 1

      But the cost for failure falls disproportionately on those who just happen to need a HDD during the period of downtime, while those who bought it at the right time pay less than the average cost, so I'm not sure this is a fair system. (Similar arguments seem to apply to this as to the question whether participation in insurance schemes can be mandated.)

    12. Re:Fear economics by therefore · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Analysis of this nature focuses on the aggregate. It is a question of market efficiencies and not how it impacts a particular individual; a market by definition is many individuals. Can a commodities market guarantee a non-disproportionate impact to every subset without negatively impacting the rest?

      My simplified accounting models don't take into consideration the pressure put on the industry by PC manufacturers, GPU manufacturers who have been hurt by this shortage. The end result could easily be a more resilient market either through greater geographical spread and/or more resilient (i.e., flood resistant) plants. If it is decided, however, that this is a rare 100 year fluke, then the costs may not pencil out for anyone, including the general buyer.

  4. Secondhand market is still hit hard by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...large capacity drives are still at the same price as new ones the same size were in May last year... I'm not even going to look at prices for new drives at the moment.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:Secondhand market is still hit hard by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Pricewatch? The damage didn't seem too bad.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    2. Re:Secondhand market is still hit hard by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      OK, I was brave... my regular supplier has Barracuda 7200.12 SATA II 1TB in for £95 delivered. Not bad, considering what's happened and the fact that the last external drive I bought was £60 (2TB), middle of last year.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:Secondhand market is still hit hard by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I bought three 2TB drives about a week before the flood. They cost £49.15 + VAT. The same model today, from the same supplier, costs £81.20 + VAT. About a month after the flood, it cost about £130, so the prices are slowly returning to their pre-flood levels...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people have no idea how to perform comparison of numbers. Incredible, written like a 10 year old.

  6. Fuck the 800 lives by Osgeld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want to know how much its going to cost me to stash another TB worth of shit music, porn, and absolute garbage movies and tv shows god damnit!

    1. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by tysonedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

      Currently 10 cents per GB, on average, as opposed to this time 1 quarter ago when you were looking at 5 cents per GB.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    2. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMFG that means for the same price I will only be able to stash half the garbage I will never consume!!!!

    3. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not talking USD with your 10c/GB. Prices are around 7c/GB in New Zealand, which is about 5c USD.

    4. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean shit porn and absolute garbage movies, music and tv shows?

    5. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by fnj · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's about US10c/GB over here. And that's down from anywhere 20C/GB and up at the height of the gouging. Cheers.

    6. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It gets worse: 800 more people have died on this planet in just the last 15 minutes! Maybe slashdot should start a new thread every 15 minutes to memorialize all the newly dead souls. We'll all keep so busy discussing the people who continue to die that we won't have time to worry about trying to buy hard drives. Then prices will quickly drop.

    7. Re:Fuck the 800 lives by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I wish.

      I would love to be able to purchase 1TB hard drives for half the price of 2TB ones (a requirement for your scenario).

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  7. And people actually do wonder.. by dragisha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    About sales going down, while prices are going up. In hundreds of $

    Those pesky customers, always making problems in free market. Market would do infinitely better without them.

    --
    http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
  8. Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Boxing Day tsunami that killed more than a quarter of a million in southern Asia doesn't even rate in the top 20 according to the World Bank.
    Maybe we should just store our data inside people, they're cheap apparently.

    1. Re:Tsunami by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should just store our data inside people, they're cheap apparently.

      "The data you requested is 101101001011010, no, wait, 10110100101101110, no, erm... wait, I got it, 1011010010110100112."

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    2. Re:Tsunami by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Not recommended. Someone dies, that data is gone.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh well...

    4. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Redundant Array Of Inexpensive Asians ? :)

  9. Just wait.... by RobinEggs · · Score: 4, Informative

    I see folks are expecting prices to get better, but just watch...

    The initial price shock from speculation, panic-buying and hoarding may be coming down somewhat, but as the article alludes towards the end, the real impact might last throughout this year. There haven't been actual shortages on that many products so far, and when real shortages show up prices could stay high or go higher even with people cutting down as much as they can on drive purchases. (I know several popular and/or performance drives have sold out at PC makers, especially on their build-your-own websites, but most products never ran completely dry.)

    Not to mention that while vendors have a lot of tactics for dealing with shortages, from back-stock to supply contract clauses entitling them to extra shipments of already manufactured inventory during crises, none of those tricks can't make new hard drives appear out of nowhere. The wiggle room such tactics enable will be drying up about now. Eventually even commodity drives could feel the squeeze as supplies on more and more drives threaten to run out entirely, despite the high prices. Because there's a lot of pent-up demand and it sounds like many of those plants still aren't nearing full capacity again.

    1. Re:Just wait.... by wisty · · Score: 2

      Well, look at the lead time on a hard drive factory. You can probably get one up and running in what, a year?

      Hard drives are still cheap, in historical terms, and HDD is the limiting factor for many systems - nobody runs out of CPU, only servers and power users (programmers, video editors, numerical scientists) run out of RAM, and Intel graphics are now sufficient for some tasks (gasp).

      People held off because they were higher than usual, but now that the price is going down (not up) demand will pick up again. People don't "maximize utility" (as economists say), they just respond to *relative* price changes.

    2. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lies. We can never have enough CPUs, as long as you are speaking about cores or sockets on a motherboard. We could have CPUs with 10,000 cores on them, taking 512-bit words, and it still wouldn't be enough.

      And Intel graphics are never sufficient. I have yet to encounter anyone who has gone 6 months with an actual machine with an integrated Intel graphics chip-set, and not have them hunger for something better.
      It's the same old sad story every time ->
      "I just like to browse the internet and do email, I don't need anything fancy."
      "Yes, you do."
      "Well, the model I was looking at is $200 cheaper than the one you recommended."
      "That's because I'm speccing in your need for decent video performance 3 months from now, when you discover gaming / Photoshop / Aero Glass / CAD / whatever."
      "You know what? I'm going to get the cheaper one. I don't need the video performance."

      3 months later:
      "Dude, I was trying to play WoW on my computer, and it's really slow!"
      "Do go on."
      "Yeah man, they pushed out a new patch, and even with the details turned all the way down, the machine lags."
      "Really. I wouldn't have imagined that."
      "So, can you help me purchase a good video card?"
      *facepalms*

      Or alternatively:
      "Yeah, I saw my friend with a Mac, and it does everything really well. I think I'll buy one, because, you know, everything just works."
      "Only one of your applications actually runs on that operating system."
      "Yeah, I think I'll manage. I want to get away from this Microsoft stuff."

      3 days later:
      "Could you install Office on my Mac for me?"
      "No."
      "Come on. Here's my discs and..."
      "These discs are for a Windows computer."
      "But the guy at the Apple store told me the Mac could run Windows..."
      "Yes, if you use Boot Camp, and obtain a licensed copy of Windows, sure. Same as any other computer."
      "So, I can't run Office on my Mac?"
      "No, no. You can, you just need to shell out some more money for the Mac version. Good luck with that."
      "Well, can you still install it for me? After I get the discs?"
      "No. I do not do Macs. I do not own one, I do not want one, and I do not want to learn about Apple's products." - a slight lie, as the first machine I dicked around with was an Apple. Still, it is a loophole that allows the Windows / Linux techs to feign lack of knowledge, and allows us to (thank God) finally emerge from tech support hell for these kinds of people. Let the geniuses at the Apple store deal with them for a while, as we have for the past two decades...as we all know what it inevitably devolves into...midnight phone calls, requests to drive to far away places (using your own gas and time), and a fair amount of disrespect. I just need to put my fingers in my ears, and hum, for several more years, while they tell me that because their MacBook is having trouble renewing its DHCP address when it resumes from hibernation mode, it must be a problem with my network.

      But back on topic. We can never have enough CPUs, never enough cores on those CPUs, never enough CPU sockets (even on consumer grade stuff), never enough RAM (I just want a motherboard with 16 RAM slots per CPU), and yes, we can never have enough hard disk space. Or x16 slots...if I can't fit a dozen two-slot video cards into a single motherboard, we haven't gone far enough. Or enough cache. And no, I don't care that cache performance theoretically deteriorates as the size increases. It's up there with being too healthy, or being too wealthy, or too alive, or too free.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Just wait.... by wisty · · Score: 2

      1) If you pay any reasonable price, more CPU and memory is generally wasted. My Macbook Air rarely fells slow, and it's running a crappy C2D. Any modern system (i5 and up) will be fine.

      2) I think you are underestimating the current Intel GPUs. I'd still advise a basic dedicated GPU if you play any games at all, but Intel is finally making GPUs which are not complete crap. Intel on new chips is now comparable to low-end outdated dedicated GPUs.

      The first generation Intel GPU was the GMA 900, in 2004, on P4 chipsets. The less said the better. Actually, it's big brother the 950 ran on Core2 mobiles - think early MacBooks. It was not good.

      The next big redesign was the GMA X3000 in 2006, which also kind of sucked. It ran on the later Core 2s.

      Finally, Intel put the GPU on the CPU, with Intel HD Graphics. The first lot (on Nehalm) was OK. The second lot (on Sandy Bridge) is actually good. The Atoms run some licensed 3rd party chipset, I think.

      The problem now is, Intel's names are so confusing you don't know whether you've getting a good one or not.

    4. Re:Just wait.... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with you on everything but the Intel graphics part. Sure they are okay if you are only doing spreadsheets and the like but it don't take too many flash videos in websites to drag those suckers down, all except the top o' the line chips of course. and I don't know what GPU they are putting in those Atom netbooks but frankly they should be ashamed, even the newest one i recently tried and it royally sucked for anything other than webvideo. Compare this to the C60 I found a customer for $300 over the holiday, that is pretty much the lowest chip AMD makes right now and that still played 720p perfectly and would have probably ran 1080p if her TV would have had an open HDMI port for me to try it out. Frankly I don't know why intel just doesn't try to buy Nvidia already or at least partner up instead of shooting themselves in the face by killing the Nvidia chipset biz, because the only thing that made atom usable was ION and now that's dead.

      as for TFA this is why my customers are rediscovering the wonderful world of DVD backups! hell of a lot cheaper to buy 400gb worth of DVDs off of Amazon for $25 than it is to get a new 400gb HDD and if you keep them in a cool dry place frankly they'll last for years and years. In fact i still have some 4x DVDs I burnt with one of the first consumer DVD burners ever released and they read perfectly even after...how long has it been now, something like 9 years? Like I've been telling them discs are cheap enough make two copies and put one offsite for things they care about like pics and then wait for the price to drop. of course those are just the ones that didn't listen to me when i told them to buy 1Tb externals when they were less than $60 most were smart enough to buy when i told them too. I'd tell them to just get some flash sticks for small backups but after having a couple of brand new 16Gb sticks just die without warning i don't think I really trust those things for any files I care about. one thing about the spinning rust is if its gonna fail you usually get some heads up.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Just wait.... by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...as we all know what it inevitably devolves into...midnight phone calls, requests to drive to far away places (using your own gas and time), and a fair amount of disrespect.

      You know what makes this easy? Tell them fixing computers is a side job of yours and you don't do it for free for anyone. They can pay your hourly rate (at a "discount") or barter something with you in exchange for your time. Otherwise, they can go elsewhere. After all, you wouldn't ask a plumber friend to fix your toilet for free, would you? (And if you did, you're an asshole in my book.)

    6. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...
      It's the same old sad story every time ->
      "I just like to browse the internet and do email, I don't need anything fancy."
      "Yes, you do."
      "Well, the model I was looking at is $200 cheaper than the one you recommended."
      "That's because I'm speccing in your need for decent video performance 3 months from now, when you discover gaming / Photoshop / Aero Glass / CAD / whatever."
      "You know what? I'm going to get the cheaper one. I don't need the video performance."

      3 months later:
      "Dude, I was trying to play WoW on my computer, and it's really slow!"
      "Do go on."
      "Yeah man, they pushed out a new patch, and even with the details turned all the way down, the machine lags."
      "Really. I wouldn't have imagined that."
      "So, can you help me purchase a good video card?"
      *facepalms*

      The problem with your argument is that 3 months later, $200 may get you a whole new generation of video card, and they have been able to collect/save interest on that $200. Spending deferred is money saved.

    7. Re:Just wait.... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      midnight phone calls, requests to drive to far away places (using your own gas and time), and a fair amount of disrespect

      It seems that you are a good person, trying to help others. Unfortunately, it seems to be a very bad side in the nature of some people that this doesn't get you any respect, quite the opposite. Try this: Next time you meet one of these people, and people discuss what to do, you suggest going to some nice restaurant and you say loud enough that it can't be missed: "You pay". When they ask why, you say "well, I solved this problem for you for free, didn't I"?

      So what happens? They might never ask for your help again. Good. They might ask for your help again, and you can now very easily refuse, in spite of your good nature. Good. Or you get a good meal, and you get respect. Good.

    8. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of those tricks can't make new hard drives appear out of nowhere.

      I don't disagree without you.

    9. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, those conversations could go very differently if you think about what you say instead of looking for opportunities to look down on people.

      Like this:

      "I just like to browse the internet and do email, I don't need anything fancy."
      "OK. You can always buy a dedicated card later if you need more"

      3 months later:
      "Dude, I was trying to play WoW on my computer, and it's really slow!"
      "Maybe it's time to get that new graphics card."
      "That's what I'm thinking. Can you help me purchase a good one?"

      Or this:
      "Could you install Office on my Mac for me?"
      "No."
      "Come on. Here's my discs and..."
      "These discs are for a Windows computer."
      "But the guy at the Apple store told me the Mac could run Windows..."
      "Only if you have Windows installed on your Mac. The simplest thing to do is buy a licensed copy of Windows and install it using Boot Camp, then your Windows programs can work. I don't do Macs though so I can't help you - just go to an Apple Store and ask someone there.

    10. Re:Just wait.... by gmack · · Score: 1

      Exactly, time is worth something. My policy is that for most people I fix computers for a living that means I want something in return even if it's just dinner. As a side note: my best barter ever was a guy who really messed up his computer several times and his wife was a professional massage therapist.

    11. Re:Just wait.... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It's up there with being too healthy, or being too wealthy, or too alive, or too free.

      More like there's far more water in the tap or far more electricity in the wires than I'm going to use. Going from 4 to 16 MB and 4 to 16 GB is the same mathematically, but the former was a huge upgrade and the latter a luxury. Before, how many applications/windows/tabs I'd have open was limited by the computer, too many and it'd slow down. Today it's practically only limited by how many I think is manageable to work with, today I could within "prosumer" prices get 8x8GB on a LGA2011 board and it's not that I couldn't afford it, it's that I haven't nearly tapped out the 16GB I have.

      Same with CPU, 99.9% of the time the computer is waiting for me not the other way around, along with a SSD pretty much all response lag is gone. When there's a job that takes a few minutes, I'll go check the headlines or grab a refill or a snack or visit the facilities, in all honestly even with an infinitely fast computer I couldn't be that much more productive. Sure, there's always things that could use infinite power but not what most people do most of the time.

      And while I like good graphics over poor, it's a diminishing return. It's not enough to simply make the textures, effects, shadows and reflections more detailed, you also have to get all the animations and physics right. Most realism fail in today's games have nothing to do with the graphics card, it's that you'd need an army of programmers to get all the details right. The hardware has outpaced even the hundred million dollar titles. And it's not just because of consoles, people won't pay 10x as much to get all the details right. The hardware can do it but the cost/benefit isn't there.

      In short, if I had to justify my PC purchases I'm pretty much down to "because I can at a reasonable cost and because I spend so much time in front of it". Like if I spent a lot of time driving I wouldn't get just a usable car, like functional in the requirement to get me from A to B. I'd get a comfortable and enjoyable car, that I like to be in and to drive with maybe things of pure entertainment value like a good sound system.

      P.S. Unless you're talking about a laptop, upgrading to a discrete GPU after three months isn't much of a WTF, I've found that buying things ahead of demand is usually just a giant waste of money. In three months time, the prices could have been slashed pretty good, a new generation of hardware could have arrived. Particularly now that it comes for "free" with every Intel processor anyway.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you get a happy ending?

    13. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see how Intel HD Graphics stacks up against a GeForce or Radeon at OpenCL-based video transcoding. Who likes home movies and wants to edit?

    14. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same old sad story every time ->
      "I just like to browse the internet and do email, I don't need anything fancy."
      "Yes, you do."
      "Well, the model I was looking at is $200 cheaper than the one you recommended."
      "That's because I'm speccing in your need for decent video performance 3 months from now, when you discover gaming / Photoshop / Aero Glass / CAD / whatever."
      "You know what? I'm going to get the cheaper one. I don't need the video performance."

      3 months later:
      "Dude, I was trying to play WoW on my computer, and it's really slow!"
      "Do go on."
      "Yeah man, they pushed out a new patch, and even with the details turned all the way down, the machine lags."
      "Really. I wouldn't have imagined that."
      "So, can you help me purchase a good video card?"
      *facepalms*

      That's why you stick APU on them. Mind you, I'm an Intel fan boy, but these new-fangled parts are drawing my attention for situations such as these. Even if my friends were to go beyond what the APU can handle, I can always stick a discrete HD65xx or 66xx in it to enable hybrid crossfire (or whatever the new term is now). I find that Intel's new HD Graphics (as mentioned in a sibling post) a bit lacking in the future-proofing department.

    15. Re:Just wait.... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Exactly, time is worth something. My policy is that for most people I fix computers for a living that means I want something in return even if it's just dinner.

      If you're knowledgeable about computers to the degree that everyone asks you to fix their problems, then I suggest everyone in this position "fix computers as a side business". There are many advantages.

      1) The free ride for friends and family is immediately over. (Might not be able to get out of the family obligation, but you can certainly get out of the friends one.)

      2) They'll decide that if they're going to pay, they'll pay Best Buy or similar to handle it instead. After spending about 4-10x as much money for poor results, they'll come to you the next time and pay you.

      3) If someone bothers you about something that you'd really rather not do, you can "have a customer with an emergency call". I really try not to use this excuse, but sometimes people will not leave me alone over the most mundane shit.

    16. Re:Just wait.... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You know, those conversations could go very differently if you think about what you say instead of looking for opportunities to look down on people.

      Like this:

      "Could you install Office on my Mac for me?" "No." "Come on. Here's my discs and..." "These discs are for a Windows computer." "But the guy at the Apple store told me the Mac could run Windows..." "Only if you have Windows installed on your Mac. The simplest thing to do is buy a licensed copy of Windows and install it using Boot Camp, then your Windows programs can work. I don't do Macs though so I can't help you - just go to an Apple Store and ask someone there.

      Only problem is that the support person is overlooking the fact that in the process of installing MS Office & Windows, the customer will have to forget all the Mac apps that he is using. Need to ask him whether he's okay w/ that, and if so, why's he going w/ Apple, which is so much more expensive? The last thing this person wants is to be bombarded w/ questions later when his entire box is overhauled into a PC, as to why his favorite Mac apps no longer work.

      As an aside, I've never for the life of me understood why anybody would ever want to run Windows on a Mac. I can understand the converse - buying a MacOS box for $40, and then wanting to install it on their non-Apple PC, instead of spending $$$ on whichever edition of Windows is available. That one makes sense, and I'm sure Apple would be pretty happy to have a service industry supporting OS-X installations on PCs, if they thought it was economically viable. They are probably afraid that if they were to open this up, then there would be tons of unsupported PC hardware under OS-X, making the OS look really ugly. But back to the point, it makes sense to want to run OS-X on a PC, but not running Windows on an Airbook.

    17. Re:Just wait.... by sootman · · Score: 1

      You realize that only the first half of your post was about CPUs, right?

      Also, for future reference, a much shorter answer to "Well, can you still install it for me? After I get the discs?" is "It's easy: put the disc in the machine and then follow the instructions that automatically appear."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    18. Re:Just wait.... by greyc · · Score: 1

      I have yet to encounter anyone who has gone 6 months with an actual machine with an integrated Intel graphics chip-set, and not have them hunger for something better.

      Hello lightknight, nice to encounter you.

      I've been using Intel GPUs, specifically the Core 2 generation of them (my current one reports as "Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller"; using i915 kernel driver) for quite a while now. The computer I write this on also has an ATI GPU, but I've disabled that one permanently since the drivers are just too much of a pain to work with. The Intel GPU does what I need, and it does it with a minimum amount of fuss and instability.
      I aggressively avoid anything made by nvidia, since the free drivers situation for their hardware is even worse than with ATI/AMD.

      Reports are that the Sandy Bridge GPUs are even better than Intel's earlier hardware generations, and that's definitely what I'll buy and use for my next systems. :)

    19. Re:Just wait.... by grumbel · · Score: 1

      We can never have enough CPUs, never enough cores on those CPUs, never enough CPU sockets (even on consumer grade stuff), never enough RAM (I just want a motherboard with 16 RAM slots per CPU), and yes, we can never have enough hard disk space.

      You only need so much hardware power as the task at hand requires. The last decades have seen constant growth as the tasks we do with computers expanded. Early computers where mostly text and even rather slow computers can handle that, but then came graphics and thus higher requirements for GPU/CPU, then came 3D graphics and then video and there was a constant demand for new hardware. Instead of storing the work of a day on a floppy, we went to storing the work of a month on a HDD, now we are at a point where people store their lives worth of work on their computer.

      So far so good, but we are getting close to a saturation point. Once you can store your life worth of fotos, videos and your whole DVD collection of a single $50 HDD. How more storage do you need? What is left there to store? One can sure come up with some crazy uses, how about a non-stop HD video stream of your whole life? How about one from multiple camera angles? 3D? That will sure take another few HDD drives, but that's not a far future fantasy, but something you can already do for reasonable amounts of money.

      We are reaching a point where the HDD storage growth faster then we can produce content to fill it up. Not for everybody of course, I am sure there are profesional video producers that disagree, but for the average user we are pretty much there already. And that is a bit of a problem from an economic point of view, why buy a new drive when the last one isn't even full? Word and Excel haven't needed a new computer for a decade either. And gaming also has kind of stagnated with this console generation not having an end in sight yet.

      I am sure there is still another decade or two of growth (or miniaturisation) in computers and one will always come up with ever more exotic uses to burn some CPU. But if you move beyond the point of what a human can consume, then there just isn't enough of a benefit to do a hardware upgrade. Unless of course we go all Transhumanism and increase the amount we can consume.

    20. Re:Just wait.... by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Lies. We can never have enough CPUs, as long as you are speaking about cores or sockets on a motherboard. We could have CPUs with 10,000 cores on them, taking 512-bit words, and it still wouldn't be enough.

      Please, do you have a quad-core right now? Have your non-video editing friends start up their most intensive computer use scenarios. Dude can even be a gamer. Look at the processor use. You'll find 2, maybe 3 cores pegged at 80-100%, and one core at 0%. Most applications don't scale that much, and although multi-tasking can certainly use the extra cores, you won't have 10,000 processor-intensive applications up.

      Yes, there are applications that could always use more processing power. That doesn't mean you don't reach a point where it's enough for most people.

      And Intel graphics are never sufficient. I have yet to encounter anyone who has gone 6 months with an actual machine with an integrated Intel graphics chip-set, and not have them hunger for something better.

      Ooh, anecdotes. Meanwhile my parents are still using their computer from 2002 with integrated graphics and refuse to get a new one even though by this point they'd probably save money because of lower power utilization. It's more than good enough for them, and they'll never play WoW.

      "Could you install Office on my Mac for me?"

      There are lots of people who never use Office outside work. In fact, I know a tech person, who is an engineer. He uses two applications: firefox and pidgin. He is unusual...percentage-wise, most people just use one application, their browser. Nobody does instant-messaging anymore, they use their phones. Either way, I'm sure he'd never be able to work with the mac. After all, he'd have to switch to using firefox and adium.

      Look, I don't doubt you encounter the problems you say you do. There are some people who honestly can't predict what their use case scenario for their computer is, and then as someone who understands the situation better, you need to convince them that's not the case. That said, forcing people who actually don't need a more powerful computer and video card (and there are plenty of those people around) to get one is just forcing them to spend money they don't need to, and you're not doing them a favor.

    21. Re:Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is any of this drivel "insightful"?

    22. Re:Just wait.... by Flaming+Troll+Shill · · Score: 1

      Nitpicking:

      A $50 HDD is very small currently (and refurbished), so I'm going to throw that silly figure out & replace it with $100-150, a 2TB drive.

      Family videos: Simple 1080p video (not 3D, not multiple angles, etc) is 16GB/hr (on my camera, YMMV). That's just over 100 hours on a 2TB drive. With kids (especially kids in plays/musicals!) this doesn't go as far as you might think.

      DVD Collection: Figure 2GB/movie = over 1500 movies at low-def, but let's be realistic, this doesn't look great on a 50"+ TV. HD compressed movies are 10-20GB/movie (IME, YMMV) so we're down to 100 movies.

      But wait! You said both on the same drive, so cut both figures in half. Oh, and for 2-3 times the price. Most of everything else you said was spot on, but your mistake was suggesting $50 was enough for storing a "life worth of fotos, videos and [movies]". There is no single HDD big enough for this task at current settings, much less when the industry takes its collective heads out of its collective *** and realizes 1080p isn't all that great - just better than what we had.

    23. Re:Just wait.... by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Family videos: Simple 1080p video (not 3D, not multiple angles, etc) is 16GB/hr (on my camera, YMMV).

      Depends on how much you are willing to compress it. You can get 720p down to something like 1GB per hour, which gives you a month 24/7 or so on a 1TB drive, i.e. $50/month to record your life, all of it, if you just film a birthday every year it will of course last a whole while longer. The less you compress, the shorter it last and completely uncompressed will still burn through drives pretty quickly.

      HD compressed movies are 10-20GB/movie (IME, YMMV) so we're down to 100 movies.

      A movie buff might need some more drives, but still compared to the $1000 or so that a DVD player cost a little over a decade ago, that's still pretty cheap.

      but your mistake was suggesting $50 was enough for storing a "life worth of fotos, videos and [movies]".

      Depends on how much you film and photograph. And for the casual photographer, by the time the 1TB drive is full, the 4TB drives will already be cheap and last a good bit longer.

      and realizes 1080p isn't all that great - just better than what we had.

      The problem is that you need bigger TVs to have any benefit from more then 1080p. At normal viewing distances the difference between 720p and 1080p is already tiny. Bigger then 1080p also has the problem that there are simply not a lot of movies for it.

    24. Re:Just wait.... by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      "Intel's names are so confusing you don't know whether you've getting a good one or not."

      Wrong. After the 950, as lame as it is, it only got worse.
      I have replaced 6 intel GPUs with $20 nVidia cards, and heard nothing but shock and awe from
      Business users. ferchristsake

    25. Re:Just wait.... by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Im an nVidia fanboi, and unfortunately, this is where Radeon shines.
      If I had to do this, I would SUFFER the install of .net...

    26. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Not if the item is question is a laptop, with a built-in video-card.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    27. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Baby, if you think these conversations are techs looking down on people, you haven't worked IT long enough.

      1.) I typically do not get paid for bad or good advice. I could dispense bad advice to people all day long, and it wouldn't negatively impact my paycheck. As it stands, it would probably improve it.
      2.) I give out good advice only so I don't need to hear about a problem in the near future, as I have work that already pays.
      3.) Do not ask for my advice if you're just looking for a reason to justify the decision you already made. There are people for that, they're called 'yes men,' and they get paid more than I or you ever will.

      You're not my customer, nor my client, and I doubt you could afford my professional services. Most people can't, but then most people are not doctors, nor lawyers, nor are they cars. My job in life is not one of subservience; I am no one's servant. I am, however, friendly, provided you do not treat me as some poor servant. And yes, my time is worth more than yours. When you confuse my kindness of spending several moments listening to your problems, and dispensing a solution, with me somehow being your personal assistant (for no pay), you've created a wonderous relationship, only in your mind.

      And yes, IT people get walked on all the time, and are told it's their lot in life. F*ck that noise.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    28. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Try it on family and friends. See if you can get them off the phone with that response.

      These are the kinds of people who take out personal vendettas against you because you won't stop by their house to fix their printer (it's out of ink). It's cruel that life demands so much of you, with your time and attention, and so little of their time or attention, so that they can create conspiracy theories about how 'you changed their default browser so you could generate more business later.'

      The only people who work IT who are not aware of this problem are those who have just finished their degree. It's endemic.

      And just try charging them...see where that gets you...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    29. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Still need to know if you've passed the six month mark yet. ^_^

      And how is the OpenCL support on those GPUs?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    30. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Have you been introduced to Steam yet?

      If not, I can show you how a single holiday sale will do some damage to those numbers. And yes, you can choose to install and uninstall various games, but...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    31. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Six-core for the past several months, with an eight-core sitting on my desk, quietly waiting for the return of the Corsair H70 coolant system to keep it slightly cooler than a thermonuclear reactor.

      Many of my friends are CS / IT people, and yeah, they all want a little more. Even the people I know who are not CS / IT want more, for photo-editing / video-editing / audio-editing / games / media / etc. Take forever to list all the applications for a little more power.

      And yes, while a game *might* use 2 or 3 cores, a lot of people like to run bit torrent / virus scanners / videos / etc. in the background. And you don't really want bit torrent sharing a cpu core with your game.

      Applications may not scale to that many cores, for now, which is fine. That's why you use different cores for different programs. Game might be using 3 cores, a virtual machine 2 cores, and you can keep the main OS happy with one.

      Yes, anecdotes. Stories from the field. The people I have in mind are the majority of computer users out there, not the exceptions who would be fine with a Commodore 64. You''ll always find some people who are happy with one car for the next three decades, but the national average is a new car every 3 or so years.

      And there are lots of people who never use Windows outside of work. There must be a point in there, somewhere. In the overwhelming cases I have dealt with, it always comes down to Office or Exchange.

      And the mark of good advice is the foresight to remove obstacles from one's path, even before they appear. Part of that involves understanding whatever field it is you are pulling from, part of that is understanding human beings. Realizing that someone who is not a tech does not understand their needs nor wants, and cannot adequately plan for their future is part of that -> that's why they came to you, a knowledgeable person, for some advice, in the first place. When considering a computer, it's important to remember that the relationship between a typical human being and a typical computer could be summed up as that of a sword and its sheath, or a hermit crab and its shell. At the very least, the computer must be slightly more powerful than what the user has in mind, and still have enough room for the user to grow. Since an inadequate machine will, at best, be a costly mistake, and at worst, turn the user off from technology in general, it's a good idea to spec in a little more oomph.

         

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    32. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      The same way your comment isn't.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    33. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      I loved that video.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    34. Re:Just wait.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Finally, an Nvidia fan boy.

      So, can you explain to me the benefits of Nvidia's CUDA over OpenCL? I am genuinely interested. I have a project that will be using OpenCL in the near future, but a lot of the CS types seem to prefer working with CUDA. I've heard it's more programmable, but not much more.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    35. Re:Just wait.... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You never explained why this would never make sense. Some people do like windows/are comfortable with it, but still like mac hardware.

    36. Re:Just wait.... by fgouget · · Score: 1

      "Could you install Office on my Mac for me?" "No."
      "Come on. Here's my discs and..."
      "These discs are for a Windows computer."
      "But the guy at the Apple store told me the Mac could run Windows..."
      "Yes, if you use Boot Camp, and obtain a licensed copy of Windows, sure. Same as any other computer."
      "So, I can't run Office on my Mac?"

      Actually you can using CrossOver.

    37. Re:Just wait.... by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      Even the people I know who are not CS / IT want more, for photo-editing / video-editing / audio-editing / games / media / etc. Take forever to list all the applications for a little more power.. The people I have in mind are the majority of computer users out there, not the exceptions who would be fine with a Commodore 64.

      Dude, the majority of computer users out there don't do any video-editing, audio-editing, or games. The only thing they do with media and play it, and the only place they play it from is youtube.

      You''ll always find some people who are happy with one car for the next three decades, but the national average is a new car every 3 or so years.

      Try ten. Which is really my point. You have a biased sample. You're around well-educated people who can figure out how to turn their computer off without asking a geek (and can afford to buy a new car every 3 years). For your sample, your advice is pretty good, and you realize they might need a little bit more oomph with their machine. You're fooling yourself into thinking that's good advice for the general population, though. I knew someone who would turn her computer off by pulling the power cord, because pressing the power button left the computer still "on" (it went into sleep mode). That's the majority of computer users right there: they don't need a more powerful machine because they're never going to do anything with it other than reading e-mail (without exchange, from their browser on webmail) and browsing whatever links were sent to them via e-mail (some of which they'll visit regularly. Once they were sent a link to youtube, and now they visit youtube without the link). The browser is the only application they use.

    38. Re:Just wait.... by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Try it on family and friends. See if you can get
      > them off the phone with that response.

      Depends on your family and friends, I guess. I've worked with computers for over 15 years and done TONS of free and cheap support over the years and I haven't had a single experience I would characterize as actively "bad." The worst I've had was early on when I would fix something by recommending a change (like IE -> FF) and then they complain that some things weren't as good. That's usually easily fixable by properly settings expectations: tell them that the way to fix it is to make it different, and it will be better in many ways but possibly worse in a couple. Hell, my iPhone is ridiculously awesome at a million things, but there are a few things that my relatively-simple Nokia had over a dozen years ago that the iPhone--even after 4 revisions--doesn't. (Profiles and ascending ringtones, to name just two.)

      > And just try charging them...see where that gets you...

      Again, depends on the kinds of people you know. Most of the times they at least offer to trade a favor or meal. Family and close friends get free help; so-so friends, friends of friends, and people I know from work all pay. I've never had anyone actively mad at me for anything I did, and if they don't want to pay, they don't use me--they get along without or bug someone else.

      My "friend" rate is about $50/hr. Professionally I start at around $100. Why should I charge any less than a plumber? I don't care if I'm doing something a ten-year-old could do, like formatting and installing Windows or updating drivers--the point is, I'm doing something they can't or don't want to do, and if they don't want to pay, they can figure it out themselves or find someone else. Unclogging a toilet might be icky work too, but you either man up and do it, or you pay Roto-Rooter $106.50 to come out for five minutes.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    39. Re:Just wait.... by greyc · · Score: 1

      Still need to know if you've passed the six month mark yet. ^_^

      Fair enough, I should have been more specific there. I've been using the system I'm writing this on (and mentioned in my previous post) since April 2011, and it was a replacement for another Intel GPU notebook which I had been using since August 2009. So that's a bit over 2 years on Intel GPUs, now. :)

      And how is the OpenCL support on those GPUs?

      I haven't had a reason to look very hard for it, but as far as I can tell the answer is "nonexistent". According to Intel's relevant FAQ entry they don't support running OpenCL code on any of their IGPs, including the newest and fanciest Sandy Bridge chips. They do have an implementation to run OpenCL on the CPU instead. I have no idea if using that approach gets you any performance benefits over just running equivalent x86_64 code on the same CPU.

  10. One more example of why not to have 3rd World mfg by sethstorm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Not only does it not represent savings, it screws everyone around the world.

    Costs in well-protected nations such as the US and regions such as the EU wouldn't be stratospherically high. But don't let facts get in the way if you're going to defend the hellholes of the Third World.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  11. Digital Cameras? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Thai floods also disrupted the supply chain for digital cameras. It would be interesting to know how things are doing on that front.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Digital Cameras? by CadentOrange · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a graph on this page http://camerapricebuster.co.uk/prod1632.html which is for the Nikon D7000 which is manufactured in Thailand. It looks like the price jumped rather significantly.

    2. Re:Digital Cameras? by Skater · · Score: 1

      We were looking at the D7000 last October, originally planning to buy one in early January. We went into the camera store, and they told us they were out of stock due to the flooding (but, a few weeks after Christmas, they filed bankruptcy, so I suspect there was more to the story than flooding). Fearing there would be a shortage and we wouldn't be able to get one when we were planning, we went online and bought the camera immediately.

      Looks like it's a good thing we bought when we did. Of course that probably means we contributed to the price jump...

    3. Re:Digital Cameras? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Indeed - between the Japanese earthquake and the floods in Thailand, the big digital camera manufacturers (from cheap consumer all the way up to professional gear) have taken a hefty hit this past year.

  12. Quick summary by UPi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Prices are still high, but not as much as they were at the peak last November. Instead of 80-190% above the pre-flood prices, they are now 60-90% up.

    This probably should've been part of the article summary.

    1. Re:Quick summary by lightknight · · Score: 1, Informative

      Still far too high to upgrade; I can wait out the year with the storage space I currently have.

      I am not going to pay ~$175 for 'Intellipower' / 5900 RPM 2 TB drives, when I have a few 7200 RPM 1.5 TB drives already installed (which I picked up for ~$120 / drive at the time). Perhaps when I see some 7200 RPM 3 TB drives for a nicer price, I might be moved to upgrade. However, as it stands, I've already figured that this year will not have the price offering I want...so, I'll wait until next year when 7200 RPM 4 TB (or possibly something better) drives are probably in vogue.

      Let's see here...3 1.5 TB hard drives, a 240 GB SSD drive, and a Blu-Ray burner, with a top bookshelf just filled with spindles of various recording media I rarely even use...and I think, with all 7 or so virtual machines on the one drive...I might be using perhaps 50% of my total available space? And I really need to do some spring cleaning on those drives...so, outside of perhaps one, read one, special project I might be doing this year that would require more space than I currently have available...yeah, I think I can wait.

      Plus, the Seagate CEO's offhanded remarks about having the customers up against a wall (reading between the lines, of course)...are rather vexing.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    2. Re:Quick summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This probably should've been part of the article summary.

      But that wsould be a reason not to plonk soulskill articles, not something you find very often.

    3. Re:Quick summary by dkf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plus, the Seagate CEO's offhanded remarks about having the customers up against a wall (reading between the lines, of course)...are rather vexing.

      It's kind of tough for you. It takes a long time to build a hard drive factory (you're talking about a cycle of about a decade). It will take a long time for prices to drop back, and you're probably looking at a new level for exponential decay of price per gigabyte to decay from. But the worst part is that you have to realize that there's no reason there won't be another such catastrophe. OK, the details might be different (earthquake, volcano, war, etc.) but the effect on prices of some critical component could be just the same anyway. Any time there's a concentration of high-tech factories anywhere in the world, there's an increase in risk.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Quick summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am not going to pay ~$175 for 'Intellipower' / 5900 RPM 2 TB drives, when I have a few 7200 RPM 1.5 TB drives already installed (which I picked up for ~$120 / drive at the time).

      Amen. I also seriously dislike how certain producers no longer tell you the rotational speed. As this directly affects access time, it's an important number. For certain uses (MOST uses, actually), being able to stream huge files twice as fast as your old drive is not going to outweigh a much higher access time.

      WDC was my choice, but after they dropped the rpm and started with meaningless marketing words, I won't I buy them. Whatever marketing boss came up with this has cost the company very real sales. Trying to sell 5900 rpm drives as an upgrade to 7200 rpm drives is not just misleading but can lead to raid stutter or worse - they should sell them as better alternatives to 5400 rpm drives!

    5. Re:Quick summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prices are already coming down. On 2Tb drives, there is still a markup of about 60% from its lowest point, but I've been watching it steadily come down over the past few weeks. The process of manufacturing these drives was already known, and any weirdness in ramping up a new production line has already been worked through, at least once. Additionally, a lot of the important equipment needed to put out has been salvaged from under water; many of the time-consuming aspects of setting up shop again have already been already dealt with. It is worth waiting (if you can hold your wad that long) for the industry to get its act together again, prices will come down in no time at all.
          I would have used the circumstance to take an SSD for a spin, but I guess the suppliers figured the market was going to be desperate enough that they'd pay whatever price was slapped on to them. Unfortunate, really, the supply chain probably could have leveraged the circumstance to increase general demand, but instead appeared to decide that gouging the market would yield a more profitable quarter. Tough shit for them.

  13. Re:My granny taught me by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is not wise to keep all your eggs in one basket. But it is probably too much to expect common sense from the hard drive industry.

    25% isn't "all the eggs". Not even close.

  14. spot market effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think lots of people don't understand what happened with Newegg and other retailers. As someone explained it to me, a drive maker like WD has two kinds of customers:

    1) big systems integrators like Lenovo, Dell, HP, etc., who order 100K drives at a time or more
    2) Smaller customers (e.g. resellers) like Newegg, who order maybe 1k drives at a time. If someone wants just 5 drives they have to buy from a distributor or retailer like Newegg.

    The very big customers will order their 100k drives at some preagreed price, delivered over (say) a 3-6 month interval per their production schedules. WD also plans its own production around such large orders. If they get (say) 1 million drives worth of such orders for 1Q2012, they'll (normally) set up their production to make (say) 1.3 million drives, deliver 1 million of them per the pre-agreed contracts, and put 0.3 million on the shelf for to fulfill "spot market" orders from places like Newegg. Depending on market conditions and what the competition is doing, the spot price will fluctuate above or sometimes below what the big OEM's pay.

    When the Thai floods hit, production was cut from (say) 1.3 million to 0.9 million. There was no way to fulfill the agreed contracts, understandable due to the disaster, but they had to make the best effort they could, which meant hand ALL their drives over to OEM's while the likes of Newegg got nothing. So the prices of integrated systems actually didn't jump that much, but spot prices skyrocketed.

    Now that we're a few months into the drama, the OEM's are in a new ordering cycle, they get to pay higher prices too, but WD gets to again allocate some drives to spot inventory. So we'll be seeing higher prices from Dell over the coming months, but some relief on the Newegg side (though the prices will still be higher than before, until around 3Q or 4Q from what I keep hearing).

    1. Re:spot market effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually hadn't realised that this was the case, thanks for the info sir.

      I have been checking out HDD prices and by and large I thought that prices were meant to remain higher than pre-flood levels until at least Q4 2012.

    2. Re:spot market effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're exactly right, but there was another force at work too.

      I work pretty closely with Lenovo to manage a Fortune-20s desktop and laptop equipment standards. Our Lenovo guy told us that they were actually doing a buy-forward on drives when this happened, in order to have enough stock to continue their production through the length of the crisis. I imagine that Dell, HP, Apple, etc. also did this.

      So not only did you have the contract deliveries that you speak of, but you also has an increased demand at that particular point of time, so that the OEM builders wouldn't have supply-chain disruptions if the recovery didn't happen on schedule.

      Any time you have a run on a constrained supply like that, prices fly through the clouds.

      Posting anonymously to preserve moderation.

  15. Re:My granny taught me by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 4, Informative
    But 70% of the HDD motors coming from a single supplier comes real close

    Western Digital and Toshiba had factories in the flood zones whereas Seagate was mainly affected by the resulting supply constraints from business partners who were forced to halt production of related components. Among those was Nidec, which produces ~70% of the world's hard drive spindle motors.

  16. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Sneeka2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'd get the same thing in "first world hellholes", only that the reason for production going down would be due to strikes and general laziness rather than natural catastrophes. Which, in addition, happen in first world countries as well occasionally.

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  17. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    Except for the fact that they aren't. You just want a pliant workforce that's not much more than slaves or sharecroppers. Have the US/EU market served by its own people, have the Third World served by its own people, and things like this don't happen.

    Also, First World countries like the US respond faster and clean things up in a better manner. Never mind that such factories would be well-protected from such disasters before they happen.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  18. Cut out the middleman then. by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    1) big systems integrators like Lenovo, Dell, HP, etc., who order 100K drives at a time or more
    2) Smaller customers (e.g. resellers) like Newegg, who order maybe 1k drives at a time. If someone wants just 5 drives they have to buy from a distributor or retailer like Newegg.

    The more reason to legislatively block such a restriction, and allow direct sales to cut the middleman/resellers out.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Huh? The manufacturers aren't legally forbidden from selling you 3 drives if that's what they want to do. They just don't want to deal with running a retail operation. It's just like if you call a shoe manufacturer like Nike and say you want to buy a pair of running shoes. They will refer you to a shoe store, since they don't want to deal with smaller quantities.

      Also remember that the OEM contracts were significant in the above picture because they were agreed BEFORE the floods, and locked in pre-flood prices that stayed in force for months after the flood. So even if WD were willing to sell you 1-2 drives directly, you would have had to order before the flood to get the low price. After the flood, if they had inventory to sell you that hadn't already been committed to other customers, they would have charged market prices the same as Newegg did.

    2. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by sethstorm · · Score: 0

      Still not a good enough argument to not require a reasonable and non-discriminatory (as determined by the end user) way to buy directly.

      It provides an option to get around jackass resellers and wholesalers.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by ohnocitizen · · Score: 2

      This is a case of the middleman not being at fault. The OEM's buy in bulk, the manufacturers encourage that with discounts. That seems entirely reasonable. Sometimes "not going the way you like it" does NOT in fact directly translate to "evil is afoot". In this case, a natural disaster impacted supply in a way that changed prices. Now prices are edging back to the norm. Some middlemen might have raised prices (and evidence of fixing in relation to this disaster, if found, should absolutely be used to prosecute to the fullest). But in the absence of such evidence, there doesn't seem to be a clear bad guy (aside perhaps from not being properly prepared for a natural disaster).

    4. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how is this for a reason:
        drive manufactures DO NOT WANT TO SELL TO YOU because your 2-5 hard drive order is insignificant for them
        they do want to sell to newegg and anybody else willing to purchase few thousands drives so you and few thousands more people could gather up and make one big order and split drives among yourself (it would actually end up more expensive that way than buying from neweg, but nobody is stopping you from doing that)

    5. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one is preventing you from buying direct, they just have minimum order quantities. Are you suggesting that it would be a good idea to make minimum order quantities illegal? If you legally required them to single hard drives in single units they would just set the price absurdly high anyway, and give big discounts in quantities over 1000. Would you then suggest that the government legislate sales prices to manufacturers? In an industry that is constantly innovating and lowering prices and generally works very well? Why?

    6. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      The more reason to legislatively block such a restriction, and allow direct sales to cut the middleman/resellers out.

      Its allowed. There is no restriction.

      The fact that they dont want to do business with people keen on forcing them into the retail business does not amount to a market failure. It amounts to a liberal, with a raging hard-on for the theory that business is evil, being given a subject to talk about that inevitably proves exactly how ignorant he is.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more reason to legislatively block such a restriction

      You are a fucking moron. The factory, like all mass-production factories, are not interested in selling single units. There is no restriction, there is no conspiracy, there is only your dumb stupid knee-jerk conclusion. You fucking moron.

    8. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      They do already. But if you're buying 3 drives then you're going to - proportionally - pay a lot more in handling charges. In terms of manpower, it costs about the same (actually, a bit less) to put a load of drives on a pallet and load them into a van as it does to get three drives off the production line and ship them to a single address. If you turn up at the factory, a lot of these places will happily sell you drives quite cheaply, but if you want them to ship them to you then you have to cover their costs. This cost is a lot easier to absorb when it's split over 1,000 drives than when it's split over 3.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Dinghy · · Score: 2

      Back in the 80's there were a few manufacturers who also had a direct retail channel. What they did was constantly sell everything at a rate higher than what any retail store was selling it for. It made it really easy for them to maintain their focus on manufacturing instead of on retail. Of course, it didn't give you the extremely cheap option that you envision yourself as suddenly getting when the manufacturer would sell to you directly, but hey, you got what you asked for. You'll probably say this doesn't pass your end user non-discriminatory clause but the only way you can really claim that is if you were to go to the manufacturer and offer to buy the same amount of drives with the same frequency as an OEM and not get a similar if not identical price.

    10. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by dkf · · Score: 1

      Still not a good enough argument to not require a reasonable and non-discriminatory (as determined by the end user) way to buy directly.

      Sure. You buy 10k drives and the manufacturer will be very happy to deal with you direct; they won't mind that at all. What they won't do is sell in small lots, nor can you force them to. If you only want a small number, it's simpler to buy from a middleman (such as Newegg) so you don't have to hold a vast inventory of drives you don't want or run a retail operation to dispose of the unwanted kit.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    11. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by dkf · · Score: 1

      (and evidence of fixing in relation to this disaster, if found, should absolutely be used to prosecute to the fullest)

      Very hard to prove without getting someone to confess to it. Prices behaved in the sort of way you'd expect given the basic nature of the market; small resellers felt the pinch first and large OEMs later, which is entirely attributable to the timescales of the contracts involved.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    12. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the discrimination? You can buy directly. Just provide them enough evidence that you can and will buy a whole shipping container (or two) of drives from them. If you do that, they'll sell it to you. I'm not sure how they do things nowadays, but in the old days you often could use stuff like a "Letter of Credit": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_credit

      Try going to a sugar refinery to buy a bowl of sugar. It might actually be cheaper for them to give it to you free on condition that you promise to not come again or tell others to get free sugar from them.

    13. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      If they're allocating a set amount of drives to go to resellers, they can most certainly allocate to smaller granularities. It's not as if other products, such as whole computers, have problems with manufacturers directly selling to people as well as to resellers.

      Package them as quantities padded on to shipments of larger orders, and save on shipping as well.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    14. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      With sugar, it would be far easier to get to the minimum order quantity.

      A pallet box's worth of sugar is cheaper than a pallet box's worth of drives. Depending on packaging, it might even weigh about as much.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    15. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Then you get treated like a small reseller, who is then pointed to another middleman.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    16. Re:Cut out the middleman then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they can do all of the things you said, but... no offense, who are you?

      Are you their boss?
      Are you their CEO?
      A majority shareholder?
      A tyrant with enough guns to hold against their collective heads?

      Who are you to tell other people how to do their job or run their business?

      If anything, why are you even telling other people your idea? Why not keep your idea to yourself, start your own company, implement your idea, and drive the existing HDD manufacturers to do the same (or risk being out competed and drive out of business)? You'll be rich AND benefit the society by providing cheaper and widely available HDDs

  19. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Never mind that such factories would be well-protected from such disasters before they happen.

    Does the name Fukushima ring a bell ?

  20. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    There are other countries in the world other than Japan.

    To avoid hurricane and tornado disasters in the US, one could manufacture in states like Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, or Pennsylvania if not for business hostility to worker respect.

    In the UK, that can be done in flood-resistant parts of that country.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  21. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many American or Worldwide corporations sat at there tables saying --well the clean up is not are problem, lets worry about saving ourselves till they figure it out-- instead of saying ---lets see what resources and money we can afford to give out to help not just the mining but to help that entire area and its people--.

    I am glad someone wrote something besides the prices of hard drives, or digital cameras, or any other hardware..

  22. It shouldn't be expensive anymore anyway. by jampola · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Thailand and ever since the floods, it has been used as an excuse to keep prices up. Examples of this would be beer, eggs, maama (think instant noodles) and also Hard Drives!

    If you've ever lived here, you know people try to outsmart everyone and an example of this would be claiming shortages of hard drives is keep prices high even known their supply chain in Ayuthaya (where most of this shit comes from) has been bone dry and their factories operating at capacity for at least 6 - 8 weeks.

    Mind you, when I go to my IT Square near where I live, only a few days ago Hard Drive prices are relatively back to normal, yet overseas, are still super expensive compared to normal. Also Nikon cameras and glass are normal prices here (most DX DSLR's and glass are made in Ayuthaya) and again OS it's still more expensive than normal.

    1. Re:It shouldn't be expensive anymore anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not import a !#@$ of maama and make a killing?

    2. Re:It shouldn't be expensive anymore anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This won't do Thailand any favors though. If companies in Thailand report artificial shortages of product in order to keep prices high, that only creates incentives for companies to start up around the world to compete in the hard drive space.

    3. Re:It shouldn't be expensive anymore anyway. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This won't do Thailand any favors though. If companies in Thailand report artificial shortages of product in order to keep prices high, that only creates incentives for companies to start up around the world to compete in the hard drive space.

      Who do you think is going to put up these factories? The same guys who own the factories in Thailand, who are profiting by perpetrating this crime? It's almost like you were anonymous and cowardly because you knew what you were saying was complete bullshit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:It shouldn't be expensive anymore anyway. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2
      I am sorry that you live in Thailand, as obviously you shouldn't be here.

      If you think that factories can now "get away" with higher prices because they have the excuse of the flood then you don't understand in the slightest how pricing works. If they could "get away" with higher prices they would have already done so. There's no need to have an excuse. It's not some honor code that keeps prices down. Producers everywhere charge the amount that maximizes profit. The only thing that keeps prices down is the concern that the buyer will take his business elsewhere. "having an excuse" is pointless. The buyer doesn't care. He will go where the best deal is. If prices are higher it's because no one is able to offer a better deal. Period.

  23. Re:First world problem by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a technical site for geeks and nerds, we simply don't need to cover that side of the story, it's been done elsewhere. The reality is, as nerds this is the important part to us. You can say we're emotionless or cruel or some other such word but those are the facts, it's a technical site, with technical news. If you want coverage of the other impact you need to look elsewhere.

  24. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

    Why aren't more factories in Colorado and Michigan then? Oh, because the workers there want to be paid an order of magnitude better than their "hellhole" counterparts, which... wait for it... would jack up the end price for the product. There's a reason these things are being manufactured there in the first place.

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  25. Re:First world problem by Engeekneer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that's needlessly critical. Of course there are great human disasters which don't fall under the umbrella of /. Just because this happened to be one which also has a major affect on the tech industry, doesn't mean the humane part of this is any less tragic. Still, people come to /. for tech news, and this is an interesting analysis on how the price of the drives have been affected, and that is what /. should report.

    Lumping everybody together as basement-dwelling cold-hearted bastards who only care about cheap hardware is just as narrow-minded as you claim people reporting/reading this are. In fact, from my experience it seems that people reading /. are often more aware of international social issues than average.

  26. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    yeah, they should have built their factories in Queensland or New South Wales. or the UK...it's been at least a few years since they had a major flood.

    after all, everyone knows that floods in predominantly white countries don't destroy factories due to the superior racial characteristics of the geography. and in QLD or NSW a bushfire is sure to come along soon and dry everything out.

  27. Re:First world problem by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    So what was the technical aspect of this story? Nothing? Right. It was already covered elsewhere, whether it be political, non-political, or every news-site under the sun, and every other technical site under the sun. Take your sanctimonious ass elsewhere if that's so much of a problem.

    But if you want to argue 'human rights' and 'fair wages' might I remind you that back in 'early days' of North America, Europe shipped all of their industry here. Including all of their child based mills, and basically slavery to do their dirty work. I'm sure you know what happened already, well maybe you don't. Industry exploded and there hasn't been a time of industrial, personal, or monetary growth seen since.

    Along with it there was no shortage of horror stories, like little timmy's and janes getting sliced in half, or the brutal 20 hour days in the foundries for children. Or well regular workers either. But hey, look at where we are now.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  28. Re:My granny taught me by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    Among those was Nidec, which produces ~70% of the world's hard drive spindle motors.

    Single supplier, but not single site. Their web site says they have plants for spindle motors in Thailand, China, Indonesia, The Philippines and Vietnam. True, the 6 plants listed are all in Thailand but the implication that 70% of the drive motors are made in Thailand is false.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  29. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stupid PC wank

  30. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Freedom for thee, but not for me?

    It wouldn't jack up the prices much more than 30% at most.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  31. Infrastructure & regulation, not race. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Economics and government coordination to disaster, not race are what make countries like Australia and the US, along with regions like the UK better at disaster response. That, and it helps to have some actual regulations to mitigate damage from said disasters, something unheard of in places like Thailand.

    What I am suggesting is that dictatorial regimes such as Thailand, China, and Vietnam, as well as corrupted regimes such as India, Russia, Brazil, and Mexico would rather cut corners and freedoms so that they do not offend business.

    Besides, arent hard disk prices saner in Australia?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Infrastructure & regulation, not race. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Besides, arent hard disk prices saner in Australia?"

      Yes but their drives wont work here. the platters spin the other direction.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  32. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful? what a joke. We read slashdot for tech news, if i want to read about how X people died or X people got raped or other miserable crap id read the bbc or whatever.

  33. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slavery advocate marked Insightful - Slashdot at its best.

  34. Re:First world problem by zorspace · · Score: 1

    HAHAPED to all of you, lads!

  35. Re:First world problem by Njovich · · Score: 4, Informative

    What? I agree that Slashdot sometimes ignores stuff that matters a lot, but this was covered, and there were a bunch of followup posts on Slashdot too.

    If you are suggesting that people on Slashdot don't know about this event, you are delusional.

    Also, I'm not going to take a bike ride in -26C, but if you want to take one in your cozy first world climate, be my guest.

  36. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    , it's a technical site, with technical news.

    So innocent.

    This is a site that's about pageviews. Anything they can force, through any form of convoluted wordplay, into "geek" news that will generate the pageviews will be put out.

    Every business is in the business of making money. What they *do* to make the money is always secondary.

  37. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While you have a point about getting a life, this is a (sometimes arguably) tech website/forum. So on here expect to find people whining about tech stuff.

  38. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    Given how little actual human labor goes is required for a lot of these products, and you get to save shipping around the world, the costs don't go up as much as you might think.>/p>

    Plus, with more people in your market area working, you sell more product.

    It's not done due to executive psycopathy and because the ROI takes more than 3 months to show up.

  39. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Or you know, something smart that has been taught for centuries...

    Build on the high ground.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  40. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Given how little actual human labor goes is required for a lot of these products, and you get to save shipping around the world, the costs don't go up as much as you might think

    So why did you (or your predecessor) choose to locate the factories there?

    You are CFO of an electronics company, right?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  41. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    One slight flaw: it's already been built on.

    And I live in in Holland, you insensitive clod!!!!!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  42. Re:My granny taught me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but what would happen if Godzilla laid waste to all of south-east Asia? See? No foresight at all!

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  43. Record profits. by citizenr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seagate had almost record profits this Quarter. WD did VERY good despite the flood.
    Looks like the only one hurt was consumers, Corporations made out like bandits.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    1. Re:Record profits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see this as WD doing very good: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16691839
      http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120123-712851.html

      Seagate did great, but that's what happens when your major competitor has big problems, and people buy from you instead.

    2. Re:Record profits. by fnj · · Score: 1

      Situation normal. Absolutely normal. This is the way capitalism works.

    3. Re:Record profits. by tunapez · · Score: 1

      Welcome t o DeBeers Marketing 101. The finance markets are tapped out temporarily, so now it's time to reap the commodities for a few years. Look at any 20 year graphs, wow what a coincidence globalization has created. Nothing new here.

      Fear. Consume. Repeat... We can always pay more.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    4. Re:Record profits. by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      You're delusional. WD had a terrible quarter. compared to the previous quarter, Revenue: down $700 million. Profits: down $100 million
      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=WDC

    5. Re:Record profits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err...so you want the government to make harddrives (socialism) or maybe we all just make are own harddrives (anarchy)?

      This doesn't have much to do with Capitalism. Actually, the fix to this issue sounds more like free market capitalism. Someone else will come in with a better product for less money, and these jackwagons are going to have to drop their prices and compete...

  44. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

    An order of magnitude is more than 30%. :)

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  45. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

    I cannot speak for hard disks in particular, but in general everything that can be produced by hand is produced by hand in countries where labor costs are cheaper than machines.

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  46. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -26 in holland? Gimme a break. That's some windchill number of statistical anomaly.

  47. Re:My granny taught me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what’s the betting though that 100% of the motors produced in Thailand go to the HDD manufacturing facilities there, and there isn’t much spare capacity at their other sites to divert supply Thailand to .

  48. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Sneeka2 · · Score: 2

    Generalizations and assumptions, Slashoogle at it's best. See http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/smokey.html.

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  49. A lot of people are talking about a laptop by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unless you're talking about a laptop, upgrading to a discrete GPU after three months isn't much of a WTF

    A lot of people are talking about a laptop, even if you don't plan to take it on the road. You might just want one computer that can be more easily carted back and forth between the desk and the entertainment center (to use for big-screen gaming or as an HTPC for free Hulu), or a computer with a built-in UPS.

  50. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by tburkhol · · Score: 1

    Why aren't more factories in Colorado and Michigan then?

    Terrible access to transportation limits export capacity. The only way to get anything out of those states reliably is by rail 1000 miles to a reliable port. Michigan produces a lot of iron and coal because it's physically located there, but shipping is essentially shut down all winter.

    Sure, there's a labor cost, but it's no accident that all those big, Asian centers of production are shoreside cities with huge port facilities. Sure, there's a labor cost, but do you have any idea how expensive it is to heat a 200,000 square foot factory when it's -10 oC outside?

  51. Quantum Fireball Ha Dou Ken! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Ha Dou Ken!
    Now you know where that fireball that hit you last week came from.

    Quantum Fireball indeed!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Quantum Fireball Ha Dou Ken! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to make a Fus Ro Dah reference, but then I took an arrow to the knee.

  52. Everyone knows what you are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but what is the parent poster?

  53. That's why I said "on RAND terms". by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Try re-reading what I just said, since I had stated something that would deny them that avenue of jackassery.

    Reasonable and non-discriminatory as determined by an un-influenced end-user would block the "go-away price".

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:That's why I said "on RAND terms". by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      You're right; it would raise the price for all hard drives, since manufacturers would be forced to maintain infrastructure that's really of no use to them in order to be able to sell small quantities to end users. They'll have to hire additional personnel, and set up infrastructure to collect sales taxes. Congratulations, you've just raised the price of the disks on NewEgg, and the price of every computer sold (hint: if WD and Seagate can't offer Dell a super-cheap price on disks because they bought 10 million of them, then Dell can't sell PC's for $300).

      Buying through NewEgg is really your best possible situation. They have volume discounts for the amount of volume they move, and you see a lower price, most of the time. Everyone suffered from the supply chain disruption caused by the floods; our EMC rep was getting nervous because they have to fulfill warranty orders on disks in all their storage, and it was becoming harder to source those disks at a reasonable cost.

  54. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *or

  55. Re:First world problem by TheLink · · Score: 1

    let me contrast the headline with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_and_tsunami

    shashdot never reported this; the death toll was hundreds of times larger. slashdot didnt give a shit because it wasnt tech news; i sadly respect that.

    And what's this? http://news.slashdot.org/story/04/12/26/1437228/quake-and-tsunami-devastate-south-asia

    might i suggest instead that we crawl out of our basements,

    You first. But don't forget to take your medication.

    --
  56. Try facts instead of political invective. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Wider availability of product != your insult.

    I'm not asking for brick-mortar. I'm only cutting out the middlemen that have largely made things worse. But don't let that get in the way of your politically charged statements.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Try facts instead of political invective. by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      . I'm only cutting out the middlemen that have largely made things worse.

      You are so ignorant of a liberal that you actually think that waving your hands and saying something is equivalent to a reasoned, well thought out, argument.

      You have not proposed to cut out the middle man. You have proposed that the factory be required to set up a very large warehouse to replace the entire worlds product buffer so that it can directly field your request for 5 drives.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:Try facts instead of political invective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm only cutting out the middlemen that have largely made things worse

      If you think the middlemen are screwing customers, and you want to cut them out. Why don't you PERSONALLY[1] cut them out? Be the middleman who gives customers low prices and make things better! Why wouldn't millions of customers buy from you if you're selling hard drives cheaper than the rest? You'd be rich in no time. Borrow some money[2], buy tens of thousands of drives from the factories at their lowest price. Sell each for a low profit. After all the middlemen do nothing and merely screw the customers. Easy right?

      Till the prices go down the next month/week, or a better model comes out and you're stuck with many thousands of drives that won't sell for more than you bought them.

      So why don't you just shut up about stuff you clearly know little about and REFUSE to understand or learn about?

      [1] Yes, if it's really so simple and easy, instead of trying to force people to do what you want, why don't YOU do it?
      [2] With your great understanding of the business and market you'd have no difficulty getting a bank to lend you as much money as you want right?

    3. Re:Try facts instead of political invective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your only response to them is to double down on a redundant point?

      What's lost on you is that you're pushing rhetoric instead of a proper option. You sound like you've not even dealt with such middlemen by white-knighting them.

  57. Replying to my own post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cant make an argument, but I like to use insults instead.

    Sorry, grandparent poster. but I'm the true idiot here.

  58. Is Apple affected? by Mojo66 · · Score: 2

    We know that Apple is able to make some special deals with their suppliers due to them paying in advance or something like that, what I'd like to know: is anything known if (I suspect no, cause Mac prices seem stable) and if not, why they aren't affected by this?

    1. Re:Is Apple affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up already with the Apple crap! There's more to life (and computing) than Apple..

      You don't see anyone going batshit crazy over Dell or Gateway, do you? It's just another computer company, just wanting your money!
      get a life already damn annoying fanboi....

  59. Re:First world problem by Njovich · · Score: 1

    You never traveled outside the place you live in? Must be American I guess?

  60. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    There's a flaw with that argument - it's easier for them to collect on the insurance and charge absurd sums to rebuild and retool than to do the job properly the first time.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  61. On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't make an actual argument, but I can sure throw invective at people for questioning manufacturers practices.

    1. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      questioning manufacturers practices.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2659717&cid=38964405

      That's not what seth was doing. Seth wants to "legislatively block" manufacturer practices.

      That's not just questioning manufacturer practices. It's vehement denunciation

    2. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? You cannot infer his argument just because he put it in question form? Considering that you seem to have roughly an equally small capacity for reasoning as the original poster, I suspect that you are one in the same.

  62. No. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Their prices are already sky-high.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  63. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An order of magnitude is more than 30%. :)

    Obviously, but I'm not sure what point you're tying to make with that response. He wasn't implying that his claimed "30%" figure was the same as your "order of magnitude" increase. You both made differing claims with no evidence to back them up, so all that we can say is that the two of you disagree and it's unclear who (if either) is right.

  64. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by fnj · · Score: 1

    The portion of hard drive selling price due to the wages of the final assembly line workers is not 100%. Not even close.

  65. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by fnj · · Score: 1

    Could I convince you to run for president of the U.S. please?

  66. Re:First world problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, considering that I went to check your posting history because of that number, it shouldn't be that hard to figure where I'm from.

  67. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    Why would I need to be the CFO of an electronics company to know there's not a lot of labor required in modern electronics.

    Ever seen a pick and place robot? It's a wonder to behold.

  68. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    Since the U.S. isn't one of those countries, I would assume that a factory here would use more machines.

  69. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, *if* a factory is opened in the US, it would probably use more machines

    But the question is why would or should they build a factory in the US?

    It certainly isn't because US labor is superior, since hey - a US factory would probably use more machines than people ;)

  70. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    Because they would like for their customer base not to shrink to nothing? So that the foreign factories don't one day say screw you, we're in business for ourselves now? Because they're tired of genuine counterfeits (off the books production sold direct)?

    Otherwise, it's up to government to encourage/require it in the interests of our society and national security. Corporate charters already stipulate that the corporation's existence must be in the public interest, so we have ethical standing to insist on this.

    Alternatively, we set minimum pay requirements on the foreign factories as a condition of import so that the 3rd world actually gets it's economy bootstrapped rather than just exploited. They then become a new customer base and so help spur demand for labor.

    Next alternative, we implement the basic income so that increasing unemployment and/or stagnant wages in the U.S. cause less harm here at home.

  71. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they would like for their customer base not to shrink to nothing?

    Business keep their customer bases from shrinking by making products, HDD in this case, people want to buy.

    How would making HDDs in US make them better? I mean, sure a "Made in USA" label probably has some value to it, but I don't think it's enough to justify moving back to the US (if it was worth it, I think they'd be doing it already)

    So that the foreign factories don't one day say screw you, we're in business for ourselves now?

    That would be a good reason if I have nothing and are trying to start a new business, or maybe if I'm playing the stock market...

    ...but these are established companies here, and we're talking about building factories which would, hopefully, last for years. They need more than just a hunch that "one day" something bad might happen to act.

    Because they're tired of genuine counterfeits (off the books production sold direct)?

    Are they really tired of it? They don't seem to be willing to move out of Asia any time soon. Instead, they're working with governments over at Asia to clean themselves up (which is a lot cheaper than moving their manufacturing back to US)

    Otherwise, it's up to government to encourage/require it in the interests of our society and national security. Corporate charters already stipulate that the corporation's existence must be in the public interest, so we have ethical standing to insist on this.

    Alternatively, we set minimum pay requirements on the foreign factories as a condition of import so that the 3rd world actually gets it's economy bootstrapped rather than just exploited. They then become a new customer base and so help spur demand for labor.

    That still doesn't make it more appealing to set up factories in the US. A corporation could just close down (its owners running away with the riches), or move to another country with less restrictions.

    Next alternative, we implement the basic income so that increasing unemployment and/or stagnant wages in the U.S. cause less harm here at home.

    Erm... how would that bring the factories back to US?

  72. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Never mind that such factories would be well-protected from such disasters before they happen.

    Try protecting ANYTHING from an EF-5 tornado, or a class 3 hurricane, or a magnatude 7 earthquake. There is no place in the US not in danger of natural disaster. Someone said Colorado, do you have any idea how bad it will be when the megavolcano in their back yard blows up? Nobdoy west of the Mississippi river is likely to survive.

    The problem was putting all their eggs in one basket. Same with the tsunami in Japan. If you're building 3 US factories, put one on the east coast, one on the west coast, and one in the midwest. If you're shipping worldwide, put one in each continent.

  73. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Storage is still dirt cheap.

    (Insert annoying Old Fart anecdote about expensive, tiny hard disks and walking to the computer store in a blizzard to go buy one.)

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  74. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    You do know that jobless (and perhaps homeless) people do not normally buy hard drives, right? And that people with good jobs and disposable income often do?

    hat still doesn't make it more appealing to set up factories in the US. A corporation could just close down (its owners running away with the riches), or move to another country with less restrictions.

    You must not have read all the way to the end of the paragraph. Either that or you didn't realize that rising labor demand eventually makes building U.S. factories filled with U.S. workers a desirable move.

    Erm... how would that bring the factories back to US?

    It doesn't, it mitigates the economic effects of not bringing the factories back to the U.S.

  75. This should never happen by SkimTony · · Score: 1

    but the relevant Bash.org quote is here:
    http://bash.org/?98

  76. Techspot is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from a different article:
    Once formatted in Windows, the original 240GB is converted to 224GiB, though Windows shows this as 224GB, so it seems like 7% of the original capacity has been lost. With an estimated retail price of $510, the SSD 520 240GB costs $2.10 per gigabyte, which is a poor value even for a high-performance SSD.

    Do they not understand the 1000 vs 1024 that drive marketers use to inflate the numbers?!?!

  77. Pursuit is h by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    That still doesn't make it more appealing to set up factories in the US. A corporation could just close down (its owners running away with the riches), or move to another country with less restrictions.

    Given how the US is quite the superpower, it wouldn't take much to thwart both. The US government just has to be willing to do it.

    That, and there's economic demand to back such a measure should it be on the table.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  78. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Someone said Colorado, do you have any idea how bad it will be when the megavolcano in their back yard blows up? Nobdoy west of the Mississippi river is likely to survive.

    It isn't stopping the existing interest in electronics over there. That, and despite being the state that exterminated unions, has sane labor laws in it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  79. You're complaining about something you're doing. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If they can allocate for resellers, they already have that huge warehouse.

    Your argument isn't even reasoned or thought out. All you're doing is trying to put a political spin on the subject.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  80. Re:You're complaining about something you're doing by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    If they can allocate for resellers, they already have that huge warehouse.

    They do not "allocate" for resellers.. and as such do not need huge warehouses.

    They MANUFACTURE for resellers. The reseller first negotiates and signs a contract and THEN the devices get manufactured and delivered by the date(s) specified in the contract.

    You truly are showing stellar ignorance of manufacturing, business in general, and critical thinking. Its a fucking trifecta of liberal bullshit reasoning.

    I am not putting a political spin on the subject. I am pointing out that liberal rhetoric instead of well informed and reasoned thought supported by facts dominates your argument. You are an empty-headed liberal and thats all there is to it. You didnt even know that manufacturers dont bother making products that arent already sold to a reseller or distributor! What a liberal dipshit... pretending to know shit as usual.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  81. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    If you actually go to a Chinese factory you'll find the layout is something like this

    1) 1% of the space is automated. There are pick and place machines, wave soldering machines and so on.

    2) The other 99% is production lines. There are migrant workers from rural areas doing unskilled labour assembling things. There are also lots of them doing sorting - i.e. testing things and sending the bad ones back for rework. The rework is all manual too. Now my guess is that sorting and rework is what most of them are working on.

    Now at this point you'll wonder - why is there so much rework going on? Actually it is often because the Brand - i.e. the end customer - put the product into production too early. So the process only works say 90%. So to manufacture you need to build the machines and test them and send back the 10% for rework. In a high wage country this would be a catastrophe. In a low wage one it's not too bad. So if you're a large and incompetent first world company, low wage is the way to go.

    Incidentally if you're wondering why loading another OS works so poorly on a netbook it is because this process very tightly ties hardware and software. Sometimes hardware bugs are fixed in software and vice versa. So long as you use the OS the machine was designed for - and I don't just mean "Windows or MacOS" here, I mean "Windows 7 SP1 or later with KB245386 and KB245387 installed but not Windows 8" or "OS X 10.7.3 or 10.7.4" - it will work. If you load Linux or OS-X onto a machine which was not intended to run it, you basically have to do this yourself. Actually if you downgrade Vista to XP or upgrade Vista to Windows 7 it would be just the same.

    You can see this here

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/foxconn-snubs-linux-users/2292

    The ACPI tables were for Vista, XP, older Windows and Linux. Only the Windows ones were correct. Probably the Linux one was inherited from another project but not updated. The board only supported Windows officially. Actually Linux claims to be Windows to ACPI anyway

    It's even worse with netbooks and a lot of notebooks since they pre-load an OS and only support that particular pre loaded version.

    If you want to use hardware with a particular OS and have it work out of the box, buy hardware that officially supports that OS.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  82. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    The solution is to either fix your design or increase pricing by 10% until you can get it fixed. As a last resort, ship the rework to Mexico (much cheaper than shipping around the world) in large batches.

    I'm all too aware of hardware errata. I have done firmware and drivers and have had to work around way too many bugs.

    I have also seen the opposite where Linux was officially unsupported but had excellent workarounds in it's drivers already while the officially supported Windows driver just barely got the device functional (or not).

  83. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    The solution is to either fix your design or increase pricing by 10% until you can get it fixed. As a last resort, ship the rework to Mexico (much cheaper than shipping around the world) in large batches.

    Well if you make stuff in China, you're not shipping it round the world for rework.

    Don't get me wrong - I used to work for companies that made stuff in China and I basically hate the place almost as much as I hate its government. If I ever get to the point where I'm manufacturing hardware I'd do it in Taiwan and not do it until it was ready. Interestingly Asus do manufacture some high end stuff in Taiwan. It's the low end stuff that is done in China or Malaysia.

    Then again I'm aiming to build low volume, high margin stuff with rather relaxed design cycle times. So I can afford to manufacture in a high wage country.

    If I were making zillions of netbooks with highly compressed design cycle times and hoping to make a few percent on each one I could not. But doing that really sucks.

    As a matter of fact there's a lot to be said for the US. Or somewhere in Eastern Europe like Bulgaria. I know in Sweden a lot of people got their PCBs made in Bulgaria.

    I.e. the solution is to move to a product that is high margin enough you can make it somewhere civilized.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  84. Re:One more example of why not to have 3rd World m by sjames · · Score: 1

    Well if you make stuff in China, you're not shipping it round the world for rework.

    You're shipping that 10% plus the other 90% around the world instead of shipping 10% to the next country over and back.

    In exchange, you can be more certain that there aren't any 'extra' runs being sold on the gray market driving your support costs up and your reputation down.