Slashdot Mirror


Antibiotics Are Useless In Treating Most Sinus Infections

An anonymous reader writes "While doctors routinely prescribe antibiotics to treat sinus infections, researchers on Tuesday revealed that amoxicillin, the most commonly prescribed medication for nasal cavity inflammation and sinuses, was just as effective as a dummy pill. Researchers from the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, found that there was no significant difference in symptoms between patients taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo three days after starting the pills were administered."

274 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. What does this sentence mean? by fredrated · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "there was no significant difference in symptoms between patients taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo three days after starting the pills were administered."

    1. Re:What does this sentence mean? by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Each group started on their pills and they checked for effect 3 days later.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Zandamesh · · Score: 1

      "there was no significant difference in symptoms between patients taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo three days after starting the pills were administered."


      there was no significant difference
              in symptoms
                      between patients taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo
      three days
              after starting the pills were administered.

      Humans are bad at understanding nested stuff, luckily for me, I'm a programmer.

      --
      Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
    3. Re:What does this sentence mean? by troc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Antibiotics are very quick - their major effect is in the first couple of days of a 10 day (2 week, whatever) course. The extra week or more of pills is to make absulutely sure that everything that can be killed off, is. This is to prevent (or at least restrict) the chance of any drug-resistant strains developing.

      One of the major problems in countries like France (where drugs are handed out like sweets) and in the developing world (where people can't afford the whole course, or save some for "next time") is people not finishing up a full course of antibiotics because 3 days in, they feel well and can't see the need to swallow any more of the evil pills that have given them diarrhoea and other stomach problems (the main side effect of broad spectrum antibiotics....).

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    4. Re:What does this sentence mean? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is why you should eat active yogurt cultures when you are on antibiotics ...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Dogbertius · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Simple solution: Don't give them any to take home. Make them come over to the clinic for their daily dose. Or use some simple syringe device with a counter built into it with replaceable needles that they can take home, but eventually have to return to the clinic. You don't finish the course in a country like France, you get fined a couple grand. In a place where fines wouldn't work, just don't give them the next course of drugs when they get sick again. Should remedy the situation rather quickly.

      Stupid and irresponsible people make the world difficult to live in. Please stop with your irrational behavior.

    6. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It means that you should eat tic tacs if you have a sinus infection. They work just as well as amoxicillin.

    7. Re:What does this sentence mean? by CSMoran · · Score: 2

      Humans are bad at understanding nested stuff, luckily for me, I'm a programmer.

      You're definitely not a compiler -- you missed the syntax error at the end of the original sentence...

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    8. Re:What does this sentence mean? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Hrm, it would be interesting if a compiler could detect simple stupid mistakes and bitch about them, and then proceed to build correctly. Though that would be done in preprocessing right?

      Yo dawg, i heard you like compiling, so I put a compiler in your compiler...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:What does this sentence mean? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like a great plan, for the three people on the planet with no other responsibilities.

    10. Re:What does this sentence mean? by frenchbedroom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your first solution (coming over to the clinic each day) could theoretically work, but it's highly inconvenient in practice. There are still very sparsely populated areas in France, where commuting every day to the clinic is just not realistic. Not to mention the work overload on the clinics and hospitals, where nurses have more important stuff to worry about than checking if non-bedridden, able-bodied adults take their pills.

      Your second solution is waaaaaay too easy to cheat out of, and it's also bad for the environment as it encourages people to throw their medication in the trash or in the sewers... when they should take it to the chemist's for safe disposal.

      Personally I always take the full course when I'm on antibiotics, and when I have a friend or relative telling me they're on antibiotics, I remind them to complete the treatment.

      The one thing I don't like about medication in France is that you almost always have to buy more than you need, because it comes in boxes of X pills, where X is never a multiple of the amount you need. That's actually one of the reasons why France is a drug champion, it skews the statistics. As I understand it, when you go to the chemist's in many other countries, they still do their traditional job of weighing the amount of drugs you need. Here in France they just push boxes.

    11. Re:What does this sentence mean? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      That has to be the worst idea I have heard all day. Making things illegal to force a person to act a certain way is, I am sorry, stupid. In this case, people would just buy antibiotics from shady drug manufacturer in Mexico. I think it would be more reasonable that a doctor would simply not see you anymore if you failed to listen to his/her instructions.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    12. Re:What does this sentence mean? by geogob · · Score: 2

      It depends which antibiotics. Some are very selective, others "wideband" so to speak. Many will have absolutely no effect on the intestinal microbiota. Others will completely kill it off, make the need of active yogourt to repolulate it.

      (but INAMD... just what I understood through experience).

    13. Re:What does this sentence mean? by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Which is why you should eat active yogurt cultures when you are on antibiotics ...

      I saw a TV show a couple of years ago with a similar story along the lines of "active yoghurt cultures don't do much either". Just don't eat entirely meat.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    14. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Americano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Make them come over to the clinic for their daily dose.

      And when they feel better three days in, instead of stopping the antibiotics at home, they'll just stop showing up at the clinic. Showing up at the clinic daily would, in fact, make it MORE difficult for people to do a full course. "I could've taken the antibiotics at home, but stopped because I felt fine," is ignorance that can be mostly eliminated with proper patient education by doctors and pharmacists - "It is VERY important that you take the entire round of antibiotics. Here's why, and you can read this alarming pamphlet with full color nasty photos of tuberculosis victims to underscore the point."

      "I could've taken the antibiotics at the clinic but it's 30 minutes out of my way and a huge hassle and I felt fine," is a much bigger problem to work around.

      And seriously - fining people for not finishing the course? Good luck creating a giant new invasive government infrastructure to monitor and collect the fines. And good luck penalizing the poor & uneducated who are predominantly the ones who don't finish the course - because "I felt fine, and the drugs are expensive, so why not save them for a time when I don't feel fine again?" or "because I felt fine, and I have no comprehension of how these things work or why it's important to take them, so why bother?" Do you really think that $500k/yr Senior VP at BofA is going to not bother taking his meds? Of course not. You think the kid who had to work 20 extra hours last week to afford the meds might? Sure.

    15. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Zironic · · Score: 1

      The compiler could, but it won't because one of the highest design criteria for a compiler is consistency. And guessing what the author meant will cause very inconsistent results.

    16. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. Results are usually seen within 24 hours and if there is no improvement after 48 hours the treatment can be considered ineffective. How do I know? I'm a doctor.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    17. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Actually when you stop the antibiotics. If lactobacillus happen to be sensitive to the antibiotic you are taking all you are doing is throwing more cannon fodder into the microbial carnage.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    18. Re:What does this sentence mean? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Each group started on their pills and they checked for effect 3 days later.

      He is asking why the **** the sentence ends with the words "were administered". They are either superfluous ("taking pills" is synonymous with "administered medication" or was there supposed to be some additional meaning (such as, a specific test administered after 3 days.)

    19. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It means they divided the patients into two groups. They gave half of them amoxicillin, and half a sugar pill. Three days later their symptoms were assessed, and the two groups compared statistically. Whatever difference was found between the groups did not rise to the level of statistical significance, usually arbitrarily set at a 5% false positive rate.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:What does this sentence mean? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Here's another perfectly valid "parse":

      There was no significant difference in symptoms between patients
                Taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo
                              Three days after starting the pills were administered.

      It is obvious that this study was done on sinus infection patients who brought amoxicillin to people who were already on placebo for three days.

    21. Re:What does this sentence mean? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Don't give them any to take home. Make them come over to the clinic for their daily dose. Or use some simple syringe device with a counter built into it with replaceable needles that they can take home, but eventually have to return to the clinic. You don't finish the course in a country like France, you get fined a couple grand. In a place where fines wouldn't work, just don't give them the next course of drugs when they get sick again. Should remedy the situation rather quickly.

      Stupid and irresponsible people make the world difficult to live in. Please stop with your irrational behavior.

      Haaahohahahahaehehehahaha...

      Let's see, in your world patients who didn't diligently follow the course (which is very important, don't get me wrong) will either end up poor and in need of government assistance (a large number of people *in the developed world* can't come up with more than $1000 USD or equiv on short notice) or they will be banned from antibiotics the next time, thus ensuring they will pass the disease to MANY MANY more people until it runs its course, and should it get worse they will be admitted to a hospital where the cost of the "cure" is now probably 100,000x what the pills were...

      But never mind unintended consequences, let's go with your plan. Punishment sure will fix stupid.

    22. Re:What does this sentence mean? by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      The compiler could, but it won't because one of the highest design criteria for a compiler is consistency. And guessing what the author meant will cause very inconsistent results.

      ... unless it guesses consistently :).

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    23. Re:What does this sentence mean? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Cottage cheese works just as well as yogurt.

    24. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's really weird. Here in the US, most drugs are traditionally prescribed: the pharmacist gives you the exact number of pills prescribed. However, some antibiotics are prescribed by the box, and that's because the box is specifically designed to have the exact number of pills you need. For instance, there's one called a "Z-pak" (zithromycin or something like that I think), which is a very high-potency antibiotic. It has 5 pills. You have to take 2 pills the first day, and one pill on the 3 subsequent days, and that's the entire course of that treatment. It's the same for everyone, so they don't dispense it by the pill, but by the box, and the doctors prescribe it that way. There's absolutely no reason for you to vary from this schedule, so there's no reason to sell it by the pill.

    25. Re:What does this sentence mean? by ryanov · · Score: 2

      Oh awesome. I know that when I feel like shit, the first thing I want to do is drag myself out into the cold to get antibiotics EVERY DAMN DAY.

    26. Re:What does this sentence mean? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean. There are no live cultures in cottage cheese. I don't think there's even any dead cultures.

    27. Re:What does this sentence mean? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      nonsense. No yogurt has enough to make a difference.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:What does this sentence mean? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      exactly

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:What does this sentence mean? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      making people go someplace for every dose pretty much gaurentees a higher percentage of people not completing the regime.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:What does this sentence mean? by geekoid · · Score: 1, Funny

      a Dr. of....?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:What does this sentence mean? by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      The Pascal compiler they had us use in college would to this, but would often "fix" something that it shouldn't, and then go ape-shit a few lines farther down.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    32. Re:What does this sentence mean? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      And guessing what the author meant will cause very inconsistent results.

      Well, in perfect pedantry I must point out that guessing consistently wrong would qualify as "consistent results". So there's an out there.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    33. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Medicine.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    34. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Azithromycin. I think it's 2 the first day, one the next six, for a total of eight, but don't recall.

      Surely there are other instances that require longer terms though, in which the pharmacist will give you the right amount (either from splitting packs, or from bulk, I'm not sure).

      Odd piece of memory I have is that it was developed in Socialist Yugoslavia, late 70's I think, so it must certainly be off patent by now. And they say there is no innovation in pinko countries. :p

    35. Re:What does this sentence mean? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      OTOH, how about a different vector. That's all the rage in pharma, I'm told: Instead of giving someone 10d or 14d of amoxy, come up with a time-release subcutaneous (or ankle cuff) mechanism.

      Come to think of it, maybe people'd stop demanding the doc *do anything* if their choice was: 'take 2 aspirin' or 'wear this klunky ankle bracelet that'll dose you QID for two weeks'.

    36. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      Antibiotics are very slow when treating sinus infections. Three days is not enough for a serious infection. I've had infections that have gone on for weeks until I have taken a course of antibiotics and then require two prescriptions going for maybe 3-4 weeks. Ugh. Sometimes it doesn't work because the bugs are immune. For those that don't know, sinus infections are extremely painful. The best thing to do is to prevent it. If you have allergic rhinitis consider a nasal spray, they work wonders, even the saline-only ones.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    37. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Americano · · Score: 1

      Do people not realize that there short-sighted self-centered outlook on this is creating new breeds of diseases that affect all of us?

      I find it amazing that somebody with such "noble" humanitarian goals can be so short sighted and ridiculously anti-humanitarian when it comes down to policies. Why educate, when you can fine & imprison, right? I mean, after all, don't these mouth-breathing idiots realize that they're inconveniencing YOU with their stupid behavior? They should all just be rounded up and shipped off to a south pacific island, or Texas or something, amirite?

      Here's the thing: NO, they don't understand the consequences. NO, they can't afford a full series of the drug, so rather than die today, they take their chances and buy enough of the drug to feel better, and maybe die 3 months from now instead. These are the people creating resistant strains, not first-world affluent people who can afford the healthcare (and the doctor's time) to get the little talk about taking the entire course of medication.

    38. Re:What does this sentence mean? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Off patent? Don't be so sure. These lying American corporations are constantly patenting things with blatant prior art.

    39. Re:What does this sentence mean? by counslr2002 · · Score: 1

      "there was no significant difference in symptoms between patients taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo three days after starting the pills were administered."

      It is horribly written and the intent is to say that there was no difference between the group that took amoxicillin and the group that took a placebo. However, as written, it might mean that both groups took amoxicillin and one group took a placebo three days after taking amoxicillin and there was no difference in symptoms between the two groups. Of course, if the amoxicillin worked, of course there would be no difference if one group took a placebo three days after taking amoxicillin.

  2. What does work? by svendsen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whiskey!

    1. Re:What does work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Source? ...I'm genuinely curious as I like whisky and dislike sinus infections...

    2. Re:What does work? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      If you can feel the capsicum then it's not homeopathic.

      Homeopathic = water as medicine. So if it was homeopathic you would be spraying water up your nose.

    3. Re:What does work? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I originally thought this was great - I took it, and almost immediately saw yellow drainage.

      Well, after a while I've figured out - the stuff itself is yellow and was not promoting any significant drainage. It turns out I get FAR better results from eating spicy food (like hot salsa and chips) than snorting a special capsaicin preparation like Sinus Buster - no clue why, it is somewhat counterintuitive.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:What does work? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Assuming the labeling is following conventions for homeopathic dilution notation, I'm not surprised that that stuff would clear your sinuses good and hard, and not because of my boundless confidence in homeopathy...

      A '3x' dilution is three successive 1:10 dilutions of the substance indicated in some neutral solvent. "Capsicum 3x" would be .1% capsaicin. Not exactly riot-cop stuff; but it'll definitely give you a bit of a kick. The unspecificed amount of Eucalyptol will likely get the sinuses cleared out as well...

      There is, of course, nothing wrong with using plant-derived compounds that cure what ails you(that and sharp objects were, after all, basically the whole of medicine until the chemists really started to gear up in the late 19th and 20th century...); but the marketing as 'homeopathic' of drugs with concentrations well in the conventionally active range always annoys me.

    5. Re:What does work? by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Agreed - during my worst sinus infections I crave Thai food and horseradish.

      The only thing medicinally that has worked for me is the cortisone shot, but that's not a viable long-term solution.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    6. Re:What does work? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      /\ This.
      If it were homeopathic, it wouldn't have 0.1% capsaicin, it'd have something like 0.00000001% capsaicin.
      To be honest, I can consider feasible many things that aren't currently backed by scientific evidence, but homeopathy ain't one of them. I don't know how it's advocates can say that the more diluted something is, the stronger it is, with straight face.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    7. Re:What does work? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      As an allergy sufferer, there is a homeopathic spray of Capsicum and menthol called Sinus Buster! that works wonders--if you can get over the shock of spraying weak pepper spray up your nose.

      Why don't you just pump Bear spray up your nose? It comes in giant 8 oz cannisters - it will likely be much cheaper than the little bottles you get at the pharmacy. And as a bonus, you can use it for self defense.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:What does work? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      If the product is being sold in the US, at least, there may be quite specific reasons why it is 'homeopathic' and why it is sold as such.

      Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which established the FDA and its regulatory authority, Homeopathic drugs are a distinct regulatory class. Further(presumably because so much homeopathy is conducted with concentrations indistinguishable from water) the regulations are significantly looser than for conventional drugs. You have to follow some basic accuracy in labelling stuff, and meet strength and purity standards(though per "Section 211.165 (Testing and release for distribution): In the Federal Register of April 1, 1983 (48 FR 14003), the Agency proposed to amend 21 CFR 211.165 to exempt homeopathic drug products from the requirement for laboratory determination of identity and strength of each active ingredient prior to release for distribution.Pending a final rule on this exemption, this testing requirement will not be enforced for homeopathic drug products." you don't actually have to verify the strength and purity before sale).

      For this reason, if you want to sell something that is listed in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States and its supplements(there are lots of things listed in here...), at a concentration that can be expressed in one of the traditional homeopathic dilution levels(nX, nD, nC, nM, etc.) you can more or less knock yourself out with only the slightest of scrutiny.

      In many cases, this does result in the classic overpriced distilled water scenario. It doesn't take many 1:100 or 1:1000 dilutions before even an analytical chemist with an unlimited budget would despair of determining what you were originally diluting(in the case of things like homeopathic plutonium, this is good.) However, "1X", a fairly stiff 10%, is also a perfectly legitimate homeopathic dilution, albeit not one that true homeopathy enthusiasts would tend to view as potent.

      The most notorious case of this being Bad is probably 'Zicam', where intranasal administration of 10% zinc gluconate turned out to occassionally destroy the unlucky user's sense of smell. Oops.

      In this case, stripped of the 'homeopathic' wording, the spray looks like a fairly plausible, and likely safe, mixture of dilute capsaicin and Eucalyptol in an isotonic carrier. Sensible enough. Whether the function of the 'homeopathic' label is regulatory exclusively or also for marketing purposes is harder to say; but it may be some of both.

    9. Re:What does work? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not such a terrible suggestion.
      When my whole head was stuffed up with allergies, a friend of mine got tired of hearing my noisy attempts to breathe and ordered me a "blueberry tea", which actually worked well at clearing my head out.

    10. Re:What does work? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      I have a pretty difficult sinus infection right now, which has lasted for over a month. I have taken antibiotics for ten days but I am still not well.

      Before reading this topic, I actually did put my nose into a glass of whisky (not into the whisky itself) for almost an hour. I could feel the alcohol fumes high up into my nose, which felt pretty nice.
      Another thing that I found feels a lot in your nose when you have a sinus infection is wasabi.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    11. Re:What does work? by overpar · · Score: 1

      Just use a colloidial silver solution in a nasal spray or dropper. Works every time. Get it at any health food store.

  3. Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can't effectively treat biofilms with antibiotics. And that is exactly what this type of infection is--a biofilm.

    A better approach is the use of biofilm "release" enzymes that signal the cells within the biofilm to stop producing EPS and detach from whatever surface they are clinging to. Use of such enzymes alongside antibiotics in a medical setting is likely to work even better.

    1. Re:Biofilms by BlueParrot · · Score: 2

      I'm by no means an expert in the field, but wouldn't that increase the risk of sepsis for some types of infections? I mean, the last thing you want is for the bacteria to start spreading throughout the circulatory system, and telling them to split up and release seems like it might do just that.

    2. Re:Biofilms by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      You can't effectively treat biofilms with antibiotics. And that is exactly what this type of infection is--a biofilm.

      A better approach is the use of biofilm "release" enzymes that signal the cells within the biofilm to stop producing EPS and detach from whatever surface they are clinging to. Use of such enzymes alongside antibiotics in a medical setting is likely to work even better.

      I just eat spicy food (liberal use of capsicums.) My body reaction is to produce more sinus mucus. Seems to work, not enirely certain how, though perhaps someone more informed on what the increase does .. though it is worth noting most of these infections coincide with winter and thus drier air. Keeping sinus from drying or keeping the mucus in productions appears to limit spread and duration of infections (though could this be how the body is meant to work?)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Certainly. In addition to research performed by my own research group, the "Big Daddy" of biofilm research is Bill Costerton. His group puts out oodles of papers on the subject. This was merely the first that popped up in a Google Scholar search, though it is one that we have referenced for our own publications: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673601053211

    4. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is why you combine the treatment with antibiotics. Planktonic bacteria are highly susceptible to all manner of natural and artificial defenses. If the area has the release enzyme in place, then they won't settle on a surface and start growing. The body can deal with individual bacteria in the bloodstream pretty easily. It's likely clots of biofilm that cause problems.

    5. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 2

      Sounds dumb, but it's actually highly effective. Unless the tissue itself is compromised (it always will be to some extent), the mucus production will float the infected mass away and confine it. It is also helpful to use a neti pot (clean water please), as that will wash away anything that is physically jammed in your upper sinuses. That is personal experience, not a course advised by systematic studies (my lab does only in vitro and animal work).

    6. Re:Biofilms by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      This one is conveniently not-paywalled. Research on how exactly to kill the bastards(at least in environments such as whiny humans where expedients like "fire", "brutal doses of ozone", and similar reliable methods are disallowed) is ongoing; but it is apparently the case that a bacterial biofilm exhibits something approaching multicellular cooperation in surviving antibiotics. You can certainly cull the weak and the surface layer; but some combination of near-dormant sleeper cells and novel multi-cellular resistance mechanisms makes eradicating them very difficult indeed.

    7. Re:Biofilms by Pharmboy · · Score: 2

      Take two dozen spicy wings, drink lots of fluids, and call me in the morning.

      Yes, it does work well from my experiences. I eat a lot of spicy food anyway, but ramping it up with lots of water does seem to open up the head. Capsicums are irritants (tasty irritants) that make your sinuses want to float them out. As long as you drink plenty of water with them, your body will do the rest. Not sure about a major sinus infection, but it surely works great on the typically stuffy head syndrome that I get often enough in the winter.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 1

      My name isn't Ted. I was a student of architecture before I switched to chemistry when I was in college, though.

    9. Re:Biofilms by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Now, if I could only handle eating sufficiently spicy food. :(

    10. Re:Biofilms by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but alas, for $31.50 I'm not going to buy the article. Now, the fact that bacteria in biofilms are resistant to clinical use of antibiotics is reasonably well established but the classic model for a sinusitis has been that of an abscess. That's one of the reasons that sinus infections are tough to treat - when the little drainage passages in the sinuses get clogged up by boogers it's hard for antibiotics to work with immune system to clear the infection.

      I would imagine that, in terms of antibiotic treatments, abscesses and biofilms might have similar properties, but you imply that an acute sinusitis is really a biofilm issue rather than a classic abscess. Is that correct?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Biofilms by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you.

      May your day be harmonious and your browser speedy.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 1

      No, an abscess is a biofilm that has entered the tissue. Their properties are very similar, the difference is the level of severity. Think plaque on teeth (biofilm) versus severe cavity or tooth abscess. The later is caused by the former.

      The current standard of care in the case of chronic infections like that is draining followed by debreedment (dead and dying tissue is removed--very gross if you've ever seen it done) for those doctors who are trained in dealing with biofilms. Sadly many are not.

      If you or anyone you know has a wound that won't heal, or has a long term illness that is accompanied by repeated infections, you probably have a biofilm problem. Do a google search to find doctors who know how to deal with such problems. Randy Wolcott of Lubbock, TX is probably the best in the world. His clinic can probably direct you to someone nearby if you are having issues. It might be worth a plane trip to come for treatment. He has saved a lot of people's limbs that other doctors had given up on.

    13. Re:Biofilms by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      A pot of boiling water and a large towel does it for me every time. Heat kills many bacteria (keep it as hot as you can barely stand) and it's amazing how much water condenses inside your nose and runs out. I can feel and hear the sinuses popping and crackling within seconds. Have a roll of kitchen towels handy - normal tissues break immediately when they get that wet.

    14. Re:Biofilms by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Now, if I could only handle eating sufficiently spicy food. :(

      Work your way up to it. Regular diet of mildly spicy and eventually your tolerance will be increased. I'm a fiend for fiery hot food and find it clears the lungs as well. Seems to generally get the lymphatic system into a higher gear.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    15. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 1

      It's not killing bacteria, unless you are pouring the boiling water into your nose. It is probably just rehydrating the mucus.

    16. Re:Biofilms by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Heat kills many bacteria"
      yes..212 degrees, for 5 minutes.

      You are not killing a single bacteria. You are hydrogenating you mucus,and that's fine, but lets not go around with an incorrect understanding of what you are doing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Biofilms by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Like he said, work up to it. Your tongue doesn't have receptors for "spicy". Spicy foods trigger the pain receptors in your tongue, which can be desensitized with repeated exposure. The side advantage of this is that triggers your pain receptors causes your body to release endorphins, so eating really spicy food makes you feel good. Some think that may be part of the attraction of eating spicy foods, the mild "high" it gives you, or more properly, it makes you feel better. Coincidentally, many really tasty foods just happen to have capsicum in them. Jalepenos, habeneros, and other peppers are quite tasty. Try some Cabot's habenero cheddar for a real treat. Not too hot, but the spice and flavor from the peppers really brings out the flavor of the cheese.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    18. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Hydrating, not hydrogenating. This is mucus, not vegetable oil.

    19. Re:Biofilms by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Sugar+biofilm=bad idea.

      Salt water is more than sufficient. No need to put acidic juices that are full of sugar up there to irritate your sinuses even more than they are already.

    20. Re:Biofilms by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      I have been day dreaming about a sinus rinse or nasal spray that does this for at least over a year. I will throw gobs of money at any company that is making a product like this. Do you hear me internet? Please take my money

  4. Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by realsilly · · Score: 1

    We've known for years that Doctors have over prescribed Antibiotics for many ailments, simply because people just don't want to feel miserable when they get sick. And since most people can't afford time off of work they don't take it or won't take it for fear of the backlash from a company, people still go to work and infect others and the cycle continues. The cheap solution is to take pills instead to resolve the immediate illness.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by khb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately some people need them. My son hearing loss is ascribed to under treatment of sinus infections

      Few doctors use an endoscope to examine and sample the nasal passages. So they prescribe blind. That is what's ineffective. When they can see and sample the pus diagnosis and choice of an antibiotic suitable for the specific pathogen is reliable.

      Pity the paper didn't point out the effective course of treatment, focusing solely on the known (but common) ineffective approach.

    2. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What we have hear is an ignorant mother fucker who has lived in a world with antibiotics and has no clue what life was like before them.

      Which is exactly what you will get if antibiotics are over prescribed. Just look at what happened in countries that don't have effective regulations for medicines, like India. They're starting to see cases of tuberculosis that are resistant to ALL antibiotics, making it untreatable. When untreated TB kills 50% of patients.

      Antibiotics are very useful, but they absolutely need to be used responsibly to minimise the risk of resistant infections. I'd argue abuse of antibiotics is even more troublesome than recreational drugs, since with antibiotic resistant infections the illnesses can then spread to other people, or even the whole world, causing severe damage that no narcotic could ever match.

    3. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You disagree with the poster, that is fine, but to degrade your intellect with such vulgar language against a point of discussion in a forum shows that you have no care to be educated beyond your own ignorance. Kudos on displaying it so profoundly. /golfclap

    4. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by tmosley · · Score: 1

      For such problems, phage is likely a better treatment. An old friend of mine is working on introducing therapeutic phage to America. His results are quite stunning.

    5. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by realsilly · · Score: 1

      We've known for years that Doctors have over prescribed Antibiotics for many ailments,

      NO WE DO NOT KNOW THAT, please shut the fuck up and keep your popular culture non science views to your self, asshole.,
      "simply because people just don't want to feel miserable when they get sick."
      What we have hear is an ignorant mother fucker who has lived in a world with antibiotics and has no clue what life was like before them.

      Wow, you're such a sweet-talker. Do you kiss your mother with those lips? And if you do I hope you sterilize them first.

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    6. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by tmosley · · Score: 2

      Antibiotics are fast going the way of the dodo. Phage is the future. Bacteriophages can be (and are) subjected to artificial evolution in small clinics to kill any strain of bacteria, no side effects, no long term resistance, no multibillion dollar research needed.

      And that doesn't even mention new methods of drug design coming down the pike.

      But you are exactly right, while those treatments are developed/gain acceptance in the West (phage therapy was originally developed in the nation of Georgia prior to the Soviet conquest), we must avoid antibiotic resistance. It should simply be noted that there are alternative technologies out there.

    7. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've known for years that Doctors have over prescribed Antibiotics for many ailments,

      NO WE DO NOT KNOW THAT, please shut the fuck up and keep your popular culture non science views to your self, asshole.,

      I guess the Harvard Medical School and the Harvard School of Public Health are now qualifying as non-science, huh
      http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2005/11.10/11-sore.html

      Or how about this study, in which 44% of doctors "admitted sometimes prescribing antibiotics to patients who may not need them"
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18196886

    8. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by sjames · · Score: 1

      I suspect it won't get any better until we make sick pay (or telework days) mandatory. Until then, there are simply too many people who literally can't afford to be sick and are forced to show up fro work even if they carry the plague. Ultimately, it probably costs the economy a lot more than it saves. It also maximizes our chances for a pandemic.

      To be fair, this shouldn't be yet another unfunded mandate.

    9. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by sjames · · Score: 1

      To be fair, step one is to show that the current approach isn't working. That done, it becomes worthwhile to examine other approaches to see what does work.

    10. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by Shados · · Score: 1

      Then people still go to work while sick, and call in sick to "extend" their vacations, going as far as getting a "friend" family doctor to write notes if needed.

      Still better to have paid sick days than not, i sure know if im sick im using them.

    11. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      This research has been fascinating me for a while too. Amazing what they did with such crude techniques... but it isn't hard to imagine how you could setup evolutionary courses to evolve the phages that are needed to combat some nasty bacteria. That said, the problem they tend to have is specificity....they tend to be overly specific to the point of not having general utility even against what we would otherwise call similar infections.

      That is a phage that kills your MRSA infection, may not kill mine. However, that may be just a matter of further evolutionary pressures?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    12. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You simply take a culture and evolve the cure in the clinic. Takes a couple of days.

    13. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Antibiotics are fast going the way of the dodo. Phage is the future.

      Since you were so kind as to provide a decent link to your biofilm assertion, do you happen to have one about the clinical utility of bacteriophages? Various, mostly Russian, researchers have been talking about this for decades, yet I've not seen much in the way of clinically useful applications. Even in Russian journals.

      So, my question is, has this made it out of the 'good idea' stage?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by nbauman · · Score: 1

      TFA is about a peer-reviewed article that just demonstrated again that doctors overprescribe antibiotics.

    15. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by sjames · · Score: 1

      The second part of it is that if you show up at work sick, you get sent home. You have no excuse, no reason to whine about bills to pay and such, that's what the sick pay is for.

      I have no doubt someone will cheat, there's always cheats. If they get caught, they're fired.

    16. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by tmosley · · Score: 1

      I mentioned somewhere in this thread that an old friend of mine is working on taking phage therapy mainstream in the US.

      As for links, there are quite a few. Forgive me if you can't see them all, as I am at a terminal in a university right now, so lots of things are available to me for free:

      http://ramsites.net/~mhickson/1934.pdf
      http://www.researchgate.net/publication/51637351_Bacteriophage_therapy_potential_uses_in_the_control_of_antibiotic-resistant_pathogens
      http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-03/next-phage
      http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jamp.2008.0701

      There are many papers out there. You can google "phage therapy" and probably come up with many more.

      And to answer your question, it is out of the "good idea" stage, and is now moving out of the "FDA approval" stage and into the clinic. I don't know if you can get it just yet, but if you can't, it won't be long. You just have to find some place that does it.

    17. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Thanks, didn't realize it was into phase III trials. Cool.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by geekoid · · Score: 1

      did you read you links at all?
      I can not find a single good study with any decent results. All I can find is stuff that qualifies it for Phase 1. Ans if we pinned are hopes an thing just getting to phase one, we wouldn't have anything.

      What do you base 'won't be long' on?

      OTOH, I ham have an incredibly crappy day and my google fu might by broken.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, I have watched people DIE because of assholes like him, so I get angry.

      And I don't kiss my mother.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by khb · · Score: 1

      My ENTs approach is to inspect the pus (if any). If it looks like "a duck" start the most likely course and send out the culture. If (as 90% of the time it does) match the visual continue, else change to a more targeted drug

      If there's no visible pus and there's no improvement then CT scan. Only had to go that route once

      And yes, he prescribes nasal irrigation (typically neilmed, but he also gave me a from scratch receipe) and sometimes suggests adding Manuka honey.

      One size seldom fits all. But the key is to use the best observational tools available. Only a fraction of ENTs make the investment, and insurance companies often balk or characterize it as "surgery".

      The standard GP has no choice but to shoot totally in the dark. It should surprise no /. readers that is ineffective

    21. Re:Lets make Antibiotics obsolete by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Did YOU read them? Beyond the first one, which is five years old? If you are only going to read one, read the article from Popular Science. The only thing it lacks is FDA approval, and that is in process, if it hasn't already been cleared (the old friend working on this moved to the other side of the country to do so, so I don't talk to him very often anymore.

  5. slashdot title also written by a moron by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    amoxicillin, because there are no other antibiotics on planet earth.

    yeah focus on symptoms, because progression of infection is irrelevant. three days, because all antibiotics cure by monday morning if course started friday morning

    1. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by rwven · · Score: 4, Informative

      My thought exactly. Clindamycin and Biaxin are especially good at treating sinus infections. Why they used a drug like amoxicillin is beyond me...

    2. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Allergies, perhaps?

      Though in my case it's the *cillin family I'm allergic to, so I need the alternatives.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by sjames · · Score: 2

      No, amoxicillin because that is by far the most common prescription for sinus infections. It makes sense to see if that's actually helping, doesn't it? Now that we know it isn't, we know we need to consider either no prescription or a different one. We can then do studies to see how that works out.

    4. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The interesting and annoying bit here is that the title of the thread is "Antibiotics are Useless In Treating Most Sinus Infections" - and for once, this isn't just bad editing on Slashdot's part. It's how the article is being hyped in the media.

      The actual take home lesson is that "Amoxicillin doesn't help significantly in most cases of uncomplicated acute sinusitis". Rather a different take home lesson. There were good reasons to use amoxicillin but Jesus Christ on a Popsicle, can't the media get anything half right?

      Grrrr. HIssssss.

      Now I need to go take some more medication.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by rwven · · Score: 1

      Same here. Allergic to sulfa antibiotics as well. Clindamycin & Levaquin have been my buddies when it comes to antibiotics. (On that note, Levaquin is especially suited to sinus infections as well)

        But regarding allergies, I think there's a much higher instance of people being allergic to *cillin's than other antibiotics. That's purely based on my own experience talking to people I know though, so someone feel free to correct me.

    6. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Lucky bastard, i'm allergic to Sulfa AND *cillin's AND Levaquin, luckily someone showed me a trick around Levaquin reactions by taking a couple of benadryl first. Frankly you should be glad you have something that works as I've pretty much kept a sinus infection for the past couple of years and after trying everything finally was told that pretty much all drugs for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis has as a side effect permanent sinus infection. Wonderful. And the only thing that ever killed the damned thing (erythromycin) you can't ever seem to find anymore. Just great.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by robinsonne · · Score: 1

      Around these parts, everyone gets amoxicillin for sinus infections from what I can tell.

    8. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by Cyclizine · · Score: 1

      Not really true as it depends on where you live. Sinusitis is caused by the same respiratory tract pathogens that cause other respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia, although the majority are viral and self-limiting. Most microbiology labs know the relative rates of infection with specific organisms and the levels of resistance to various antibiotics. Hence, where I work, the common organisms are H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis, for which over 80% are sensitive to amoxicillin or doxycycline. Adding in a bit of beta-lactamase inhibition with co-amoxiclav doesn't really help. My opinion, for simple acute sinusitis, is that there's no benefit in antibiotics. They may shorten the duration of illness, but at the risk of antibiotic side-effects, which are more common than people think. This is backed up by Cochrane. Don't you just love Evidence Based Medicine!

    9. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by rwven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wonder what happened to erythromycin. That was the drug I ALWAYS got as a kid because of my allergies.

    10. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by skydyr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you know that all antibiotics are the same, work on the same infections in the same manner, and are only renamed for marketing purposes and in case some idiot thinks he has an allergy to one?

    11. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's not what I've found in my anecdotal evidence; I had a terrible case of sinusitis (made much worse through some air travel) that didn't go away until I finally saw a doctor and got a zithromax (azithromycin) prescription. That wiped it out in a day or two. The effect was rather remarkable. I don't recall any major side-effects either, maybe a very, very slight bit of diarrhea on the first day.

    12. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Simple it went out of patent protection so the companies won't make it anymore. this is why I believe we need state run pharma companies whose job it is to make no longer patented drugs. I've spoken with my doctor who tries to stay at the cutting edge because so many things come down the pipe for psoriatic arthritis and according to him many of the drugs that work well but don't have 8000% profit margins are being quietly dumped. Welcome to the future where the drug that works will be canceled for a drug that doesn't because they can make coke and hookers money on the second.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by Kilrah_il · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I may offer you a small advice, as an ENT doctor, use nasal irrigation. Many studies have showed that it is as important as antibiotics in the treatment of sinusitis.
      Good luck!

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    14. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by cyachallenge · · Score: 1

      I'm allergic to every single antibiotic I've had, and I've had quite a few. I can name the ABCs of the antibiotics that give me full body hives for weeks.

      Do any other people have this issue with antibiotics? I wonder why some people can be allergic to such a wide range of drugs. It's my trouble also.

    15. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Why can't a small start-up come in and start making these generic drugs? Why aren't there companies that do nothing but profit off of patent-free medications? I'm afraid I know the answer - that the big companies will ramp up production again just long enough to push these guys out of the market.

    16. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by Formalin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm, I don't know about that, as I've been prescribed Penicillin V within the last 5 years. You know, stuff from the dawn of antibiotics. (I've also had more modern antibiotics as well, so it's not a lack of them being available).

      However, I live in a country that puts health before profits, so that could be related.

      On the other hand, I suppose some of the early-gen antibiotics are being used less these days simply because in a lot of cases, they don't work very well. Doctor doesn't want you coming back in a week for something newer because the infection was penicillin resistant, or so. Which of course makes bacteria more exposed to new drugs, which makes them less effective... ad nauseam.

    17. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by proggoddess · · Score: 1

      It is very, very difficult to become a pharma company. The startup costs are huge, even if you are not spending any money on R&D of new drugs. The business must first register with the FDA, they have to have all sorts of strict quality controls in place, then the drugs must be tested for efficacy and safety and the results approved by the FDA. I work for a small medical device company and it's going to be awhile before we become profitable and the regulations and requirements for drug manufacturers are very similar.

      --
      --The Programming goddess from Gorflaz
    18. Re:slashdot title also written by a moron by Meski · · Score: 1

      Not a biologist, but if these 'early' drugs haven't been used for a while, won't the bacteria no longer be resistant to them?

  6. Here's a link to the actual study at JAMA's site by stillnotelf · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/307/7/685.short I can't tell if it's paywalled or not - it appears to be. Pubmed hasn't indexed it yet (not that they offer free articles from JAMA anyway).

  7. Obvious... by Covalent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most sinus infections are viral. Nothing to see here.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:Obvious... by stillnotelf · · Score: 2

      From the paper: "All study participants met the recommended clinical criteria for acute rhinosinusitis[1] and are representative of patients for whom antibiotics might be prescribed." [1] is Hickner JM, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, Gonzales R, Hoffman JR, Sande MA, American Academy of Family Physicians; American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Mediciine; Centers for Disease Control; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute rhinosinusitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(6):498–505.

    2. Re:Obvious... by AtomicJake · · Score: 1

      OP is correct, though. Troublesome to see a rather recent publication (2001) giving the wrong advice for such a "standard" disease.

    3. Re:Obvious... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are both right. Most sinus infections are viral, and many patients with viral sinus infections demand that the doctor "do something," which generally means they want antibiotics. Many times they still demand antibiotics even though the doctor explains that antibiotics will not work for their *viral* infection. Thus anybody with sinusitis, be it viral or bacterial, is somebody who "might" be prescribed antibiotics.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    4. Re:Obvious... by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's an argument that viral infections won't benefit from antibiotics (they won't). Antibiotics are typically prescribed for secondary infections that result from blockage created by the primary infection. Although the initial infection and inflammation may be viral, the end result is the swelling reduces proper drainage of the sinuses and promotes bacterial growth which in turn can lead to a bacterial infection resulting from the initial viral infection.

      Surprised they used such an old antibiotic for their study rather than using a range of newer alternatives shown to be much more effective.

    5. Re:Obvious... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      2001 is not recent. In fact in medical school if you cite papers that are 10+ years old you are likely to be told off. Medicine is a fast moving field.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Sinus infections don't last long enough? by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    In most cases?

    Most likely, there was no measurable change between the two groups. I have had all sorts of antibiotics prescribed to me for various issues, amoxicillin is only given in the least annoying conditions by my doctor. I have done the zpacs (amoxicillin), cefalexin, and in one case I had cipro (which I will not wish on anyone, it worked but side effects were not fun and it was not for a sinus infection)

    I have pretty much gotten away from drugs for a sinus infection unless it doesn't seem to sort itself out quickly. Not sure if that is good or bad, but I haven't had as many since I stopped trying to treat them with antibiotics.

    I would RTFA to find out what they did to insure parity among control groups... but... its more fun to post

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Sinus infections don't last long enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and in one case I had cipro

      All I can figure based on the above post, and especially this part, is you work in a class 5 biocontainment lab and some of the anthrax got in your suit.

    2. Re:Sinus infections don't last long enough? by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Last time I looked, my wife doesn't work in a class 5 hot facility (although sometimes the mud room around the cat litter box gets close), but the round of Cipro she had after a ruptured appendix saved her life.

      And by "ruptured" I mean "completely detached and misdiagnosed for 24 hours" ruptured. I think her native stubbornness and strong immune system (the catbox again) kept her alive until the medicos figured out that that gall bladder shadow in her x-ray was actually her escaped appendix, especially since it was in her medical records that she'd had the damn gall bladder removed a year earlier at that very hospital.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  9. that's amoxicillin by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Azithromycin (in the form of a Tri-Pak) sure seems to make a dent in my sinus/bronchial infections.

    1. Re:that's amoxicillin by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Have you compared it in a double-blind test to placebo?

    2. Re:that's amoxicillin by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Nope. Hence the word "seems". My point, though, was that it's not reasonable to generalize Amoxicillin's lack of efficacy to all antibiotics.

  10. Old news but it still has be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    However; when you have dark green stuff coming out of your nose and you coughing jello from deep inside your lungs, you might qualify for some good antibiotics. For milder stuff, docs recommend rest and over counter stuff. Sometimes a breathing treatment can help. Let's hope you have insurance?

    1. Re:Old news but it still has be said. by sqldr · · Score: 1

      However; when you have dark green stuff coming out of your nose and you coughing jello from deep inside your lungs, you might qualify for some good antibiotics

      That's mucus. The rhinovirus irritates the sinuses, causing the discharge, then lives off the discharge. That's how it lives. That's not bacteria.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  11. Over-extapolating by wonderboss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Big leap from "no significant difference in symptoms between patients taking amoxicillin to those who took the placebo"
    to "Antibiotics Are Useless In Treating Most Sinus Infections". How many bugs are resistant to amoxicillin at this point?
    How many of the patients had bacterial infections?

    --
    more cowbell
  12. inaccurate summary by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    abstract is here http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/307/7/685.abstract
    story itself, paid for probably with tax dollars is paywalled
    The abstract says that yes, at 3 days, amoxicillin and placebo similar, but there was a diff at day 6
    Also, total number of patients studied is quite small - Typical Bull**** "MD" science - mds just don't know how to do science, and they constantly flood the literature with these worthless studies, so the net result is a negative, cause you have towaste brain power to not pay attention

    However, what is of more interest is the hard to read format of the abstract, which is a deliberate format imposed by the medical journals; the use of statistics in parenthesis, eg quote, mean difference between groups of 0.03 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.19]) and on day 10 (mean difference between groups of 0.01 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.15]), but differed at day 7 favoring amoxicillin (mean difference between groups of 0.19 [95% CI, 0.024 to 0.35]).
    makes the abstract almost impossible to read; this practice has been criticized, but the idiot mds of course don't listen.
    Not only that, with the number of people in the study, if you know naything of the history of medical studies, to give CIs is just BS, crazy statistics for no reason other then to tget a publication or satisfy the wierdness of hte editors; everything that is wrong with academic medicine is in this abstract
    sorry for rant

    1. Re:inaccurate summary by tibit · · Score: 1

      I wish you weren't right, but right you are. 166 adults, haha. Anyway, I love the cut-off conclusion. What they say:

      Among patients with acute rhinosinusitis, a 10-day course of amoxicillin compared with placebo did not reduce symptoms at day 3 of treatment.

      What they meant to say: Among patients with acute rhinosinusitis, a 10-day course of amoxicillin compared with placebo did not reduce symptoms at day 3 of treatment. The symptoms were reduced at day 7 of treatment. Another important point: if the symptoms appear to be reduced at day 7, but not reduced at days 3 and 10, then you may wish to question the test you're using (SNOT-16 in their case), or your sample size. I wouldn't want my name on this paper with less than ~630 adults.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:inaccurate summary by t551 · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that showing the test statistics is a bad thing? Looking at the confidence intervals tells you immediately whether the null hypothesis was accepted or rejected, and gives you a (fuzzy) idea of by how much.

  13. Re:Here's a link to the actual study at JAMA's sit by stillnotelf · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here are some interesting points from the paper:

    A) Someone's got a sense of humor: "The primary outcome was measured using the modified Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16), a validated and responsive measure."

    B) They did no testing whatsoever to ensure the sinus infections _were_ bacterial - but they apparently usually are, and are usually diagnosed as such symptomatically instead of by culture (in other words, they followed normal practices in deciding who to give antibiotics to).

    C) They did no testing to see if resistant bacteria could be isolated from any patients.

    Putting B and C together...clearly the medical community is overprescribing antibiotics, but there may be some question of whether it's resistant bacterial infections or poor diagnosis of bacterial vs. viral infections.

  14. Nope by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    THE AC submission was alarmist and wrong.

    The research did not show the anitbiotics are useless.

    It showed the Amoxicillin had no significant statistical difference at day three. BUT statistically significant results on day 7, no difference on day 10.

    What this means is the people taking Amoxicillin got better sooner.

    The person who wrote the headline and summary should be ashamed of themselves.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Nope by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You are correct that the Slashdot summary is alarmist, but I would point out that the lay press is pulling the same stunt.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  15. my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by nido · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doctors have a tendency to recommend things that only they can recommend: prescription drugs, surgery, etc. They figure if you could do it yourself you'd have already done it.

    But there's an ancient treatment for sinus problems that works really well: nasal irrigation. Basically, you add 1/2 tsp salt to a cup of water, and flush that through your nasal cavity.

    Wall Street's media was overjoyed when someone with parasites in their water supply recently died after they used their neti pot. So boil your water first if that's a problem where you live, mkay? (This is covered on the link above...)

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      I'd also advise using a brita filter or something, then again I have the most ridiculous hard water in my apartment. I sponge down my bathroom walls every month to get rid of the yellow streaks.

    2. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is how I beat well over half of the sinus infections I get - nasal irrigation works great.

      However, sometimes the infection is stubborn and it resists 1-2 weeks of irrigation, staying in a steady state of no improvement. At that point I'll usually give in and start antibiotics, and with one exception (Normally my infections are triggered by normal colds initially, or allergies, in this case one of my peak allergy periods occurred two weeks AFTER the initial infection trigger, which was sewage-laden dust from the September 2011 Susquehanna flooding), they have always cleared up the infection in only a day or so.

      I think the problem is that in the article given, the doctors in question are probably starting the antibiotics too early - if it's the first few days of "infection" it's very difficult to separate viral causes (just a cold), allergic causes, and actual bacterial causes. Now if you're at nearly 2 weeks of routine nasal irrigation and you have frequent bright yellow discharge restart 2-3 hours after you irrigate - at that point it's much more likely to be bacterial.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except they don't really work for infections. By the time you're feeling symptoms of a sinus infection, it's already in your bloodstream, you can't just wash it away by pouring water up your nose. Now, it's not to say they're worthless, especially if you use them on a regular basis. The reason sinus infections are so common is that the mucus in your nose provides an ideal environment for bacteria to grow. Since a colony can grow in the mucus in peace (there are no white blood cells in snot), it can get quite strong before it enters the bloodstream, at which point it's too late for your body to easily and quickly fight off. Nasal irrigation can also help with recurrence, since it's possible for a bacterial colony to take hold in your nose, and essentially keep reintroducing itself back into the bloodstream as your body fights it off. What nasal irrigation can't do though is actually fight off an infection. The congestion and runny nose associated with a sinus infection are symptoms, not the infection itself, which is in your bloodstream, and requires either natural antibodies or antibiotics to cure.

    4. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Nimey · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except that improperly-done nasal irrigation can kill. There were a couple people in Louisiana who used tap water to irrigate their sinuses, but the water was infected with an amoeba that killed them.

      Ought to use distilled water for that at the least.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    5. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Neti pots are great but are frequently used improperly.

      If you have allergies, use cool water, not warm. Never use salt. Cool water opens the sinus and helps with drainage. Drainage issues are the number one cause of infection.

      If you have an infection, this is the only time you'll use salt. I'd recommend starting with 1/4 tsp and work up to 1/2 tsp, no more, if you're not seeing results after a day. Remember, your sinus is already inflamed. Salt is an irritant to your sinus. Its possible that the use of salt can prevent proper drainage by causing additional irritation and inflimation.

      Distilled, filtered, and/or boiled water all work well for a neti pots. Tap water in every place should be considered suspect. There is no such thing as 100% safe water out of a tap. While rare, bugs do make it past treatment plants in even the best of facilities. As your nasal passage is especially good at passing bugs in either direction, care should be taken. Now then, I'm not saying everyone needs to boil their water but understand anyone and everyone who doesn't do so with tap water is taking a risk, no matter how small. The deaths in LA while not flukes are rare. Just the same, understand its not impossible to happen in your neck of the woods.

      BTW, for those of you with something like a Brita filter decanter, the difference between cheap vodka and expensive vodka is literally one or two passes through your filter. This is also true for some other types of booze. Enjoy!

    6. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by God'sDuck · · Score: 2

      Except that improperly-done nasal irrigation can kill. There were a couple people in Louisiana who used tap water to irrigate their sinuses, but the water was infected with an amoeba that killed them.

      Ought to use distilled water for that at the least.

      The instructions say to microwave the water to boiling, let it cool back to room temperature, then use it. I don't know of any cases of infection from people that followed those instructions.

    7. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Americano · · Score: 1

      Never use salt.

      Doing a nasal rinse with a hypotonic (less salt than found in your cells) solution will contribute to swelling, and in fact, won't do much of anything to alleviate your symptoms. The goal is to find a salt level that is roughly isotonic, or perhaps a slight bit hypertonic, which will tend to pull moisture out of the cells in the nasal cavity - which has the net effect of reducing swelling. A perfectly isotonic rinse would cause no net loss or gain of water inside the cells, and is perfect. Too much or too little salt will irritate and/or contribute to swelling by adding water to the tissues.

      Also, a brita filter will do just about zero to remove microorganisms from water, unless you're literally pouring pond water through it - then it'll probably remove SOME of the microorganisms. Distilled or boiled water is the way to go.

    8. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by englishknnigits · · Score: 1

      Unless you are like me and have weak connections between your sinuses and your eustachian tubes. In that case, nasal irrigation can push the infection into your ears and causes ear infections. If you do use nasal irrigation I definitely recommend the more neti pot style where you let gravity do the work and don't squeeze a bottle yourself. It is easy to oversqueeze and spread the infection.

    9. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Or just use saline solution. I buy it in the supermarket for a few cents.

    10. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Politburo · · Score: 1

      It's really only vodka that the filtering works for, as a perfect vodka is pure alcohol (in solution, of course). Other boozes have many other factors going into their production.. if you filter a cheap gin, you'll have a filtered cheap gin. A brita won't add botanicals that cheap producers skimp on (or use chemical substitutes for). It may even remove desired flavors. For other boozes, aging comes into play. You're not going to get a 25-year scotch by filtering a cheap 3-year.

    11. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Of course, the best solution by far would be C. deliver the antibiotics to the sinus cavity by dissolving them in the water that you spray them up your nose....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You should boil the water for 5 minute to insure everything is dead.

      That's 5 minutes from when the boiling starts.

      I'm not sure if the direction give a time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:my favorite sinus remedy: simple, cheap by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I find that an isotonic rinse (i prefer the squeeze bottle) it not terrifically effective at eliminating my sinusitis when it happens, but in combination with a topical antibiotic does tend to work.

      After several years of increasingly frequent sinusitis, and going to larger (and more expensive) doses of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid, I decided to take the advice of one of my friends goofy mothers and get a bottle of grapefruit seed oil. I figured it couldn't hurt, why not? It took abuot 2 years to get the routine down: Well, I managed to kick one with a combo of ipratropium bromide (a prescription nasal spray which really dries out the sinuses) at night when I couldn't effectively clear my sinuses regularly and guiafenisen during the day when I could, plus ~4-5 rinses a day. I skipped the grapefruit treatment once - the stuff is bitter as all hell - and it was no joy. Added it back and the infection went away. Tried the no-grapefruit option the next time - again no relief. It got so bad I went to the doctor and got a prescription for 875/125 Amox/Clav, but in talking with him about it, he suggested trying some neosporin* ointment in the rinse. Yup...worked in 2 days and I skipped the Amox treatment.

      It sounds weird, but the logic works - keep the growth media out of the sinuses (reduce flow at night, increase and expel during the day), apply a "topical" antibiotic to the affected area, and flush the area clean regularly. The IpBromide is like $12 without health insurance coverage, and lasts me probably 3-4 treatment courses. I just wish I could find an aqueous suspension of anti-bacterial to use in the rinse, as the ointment is hard to emulsify in 100F water and it leaves a bit of a film in the irrigation bottle.

      *I've used neosporin many times to help heal a bloody nose due to maceration of the tissue on my septum from blowing my nose too much, at the recommendation of a doctor, so it's not surprising that small amounts are not really a concern for the mucous membranes in your sinuses.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  16. Common Cold by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    This is no different than the common cold, 90% of which come from a virus instead of bacteria.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Common Cold by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I read a few months back about anti-viral medicines in the works that could end up being a effective against wide-ranges of viruses as anti-biotics are against bacteria.

      Could be revolutionary if true. Until virus evolve to resist them at least.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  17. that sucks by james_van · · Score: 2

    i currently a) have a sinus infection, b) am taking amoxicillin to treat it, and c) am completely miserable. hey science, thanks for making my day even worse!

    1. Re:that sucks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      amoxicilin showed to be better then placebo on day 7.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:that sucks by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      If it's a real, bacterial sinus infection, I hope that you got a combo amox+clavulanic acid - Augmentin is one of the common brand names.

      Take this with the same weight you take random people giving you suggestions on the internet:

      Use a nasal rinse (neti pot or irrigation bottle - I always use the latter, as it helps when you need a bit more than gravity to clear)
            use it 4-5 times a day, in addition to and in place of blowing your nose. Your nose will thank you.
            if you are adventurous, put in a dab of neosporin (I know, ointment - it won't want to emulsify; shake it well) or grapefruit seed oil (weird, an bitter, but mildly anti-bacterial)
            ***use a good thermometer heat your water to 101-102F before putting it in the bottle, adding the salt (and antibac) - you want that water just a hair over body temp when you squirt it into your nose. It's the difference between very little sensation and remembering the last time you got water up your nose at a swimming pool.

      If your sinuses are filling up at night, ask the doc for Ipratropium Bromide (Atrovent, a spray). No, it's not really meant for drying up sinuses, but it works like nothing you've ever seen. Use it after the last nasal rinse at night, and again after a nasal rinse about 1-2am. Half the normal dosing is typically enough.

      Wanna keep the juices flowing and expel as much as possible during the day? Mucinex/guiafenisen.

      I have problems with sinusitis (get it following even the most minor colds), and it used to put me out of commission for up to 3 weeks, then about a week with Augmentin. Now they are annoying, and I'm at half power for a day or two (or three), but I don't need antibiotics to kick it any more.

      YMMV

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  18. I want a Placebo by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can someone tell me where I can buy a pack of placebos please?

    They seem to be really usefull in fighting off all sorts of diseases.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:I want a Placebo by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me where I can buy a pack of placebos please?

      They seem to be really usefull in fighting off all sorts of diseases.

      You can buy Pez brand placebos at some grocery stores. They come in a rather inventive storage devise.

    2. Re:I want a Placebo by Hentes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just ask for homeopathic medicine.

    3. Re:I want a Placebo by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Awesome- I've seen them.

      Do you happen to know if Lightning McQueen or Dorothy from Wizard of Oz works best at combating cancer?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  19. Question by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Are antibiotics ineffective on sinus infections because the infection is viral and not bacterial or could it be that the common bacteria responsible for such an infection has grown resistant to the antibiotic?

  20. Re:Obvious...Complications... by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is entirely possible for a virus to give tissue damage that then results in a bacterial infection or visa versa!

    Hence, I can easily believe that a rhinovirus could easily prevent clearing up a sinus infection with bacteria.

    Biofilms, as mentioned by others, may also be an important variable.

    It is anything but simple "Yes or No."

  21. Mayo clinic: most are viral by Bhrian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A Mayo clinic study found 70% of sinus infections are viral instead of bacterial, so antibiotics actually make the infection worse. In addition, the antibiotics harm the rest of your immune system, leaving your worse off than before. My ENT introduced me to anti-viral nasal sprays for sinus infections. More of the drug reaches the infection and your GI system is left unharmed. The catch is they must be compounded at a pharmacy, need to be refrigerated, and are only good for 30 days. Many insurance companies cover them, but a lot of doctors don't know that option exists and just prescribe antibiotics.

  22. Yes but by aglider · · Score: 1

    the antibyotics factories have a different view. Very different.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  23. Kids vs Adults? by jdev · · Score: 1

    I noticed this study was only conducted on adults. I'd be curious if the results would be replicated in children as well. When my kids were younger, they had sinus infections at least twice a year and would get amoxicillin every time. If a sinus infection would clear up on its own about as fast, there wouldn't have been as much need for the constant doctor visits.

    The article says sinus infections account for 20% of all antibiotics prescribed for adults. I'd be surprised if that number wasn't over 50% for kids. Not using antibiotics for sinus infections would be a huge help in reducing antibiotics use. On the other hand, it would probably be devastating for pediatric clinics.

  24. Salt water flush by elgeeko.com · · Score: 1

    Works every time, costs pennies and has almost no side effects. Don't need a prescription for it either.

    1. Re:Salt water flush by james_van · · Score: 1

      Works every time

      I currently have a nasty sinus infection that begs to differ

    2. Re:Salt water flush by sqldr · · Score: 1

      and has almost no side effects

      Apart from the eye-watering stinging sensation of having salt water going around your already inflamed sinuses :-) Still, only lasts a couple of minutes.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    3. Re:Salt water flush by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You're flushing it wrong!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Salt water flush by elgeeko.com · · Score: 1

      You're telling me that you've saturated your sinus cavity daily with salt water, let it soak in for 4-5 minutes, blew it out and had no effect? You have a lot more than a sinus infection. You do know the salt water goes in your nose right? Has the infection gotten in your lungs, if it has then you're way past a sinus infection.

    5. Re:Salt water flush by elgeeko.com · · Score: 1

      Okay, I admit it can sting and the increased pressure in an already inflamed sinus cavity can be painful, but compared to antibiotics it is a lot more effective and doesn't cause the intestinal distress caused by antibiotics. It can also be a little gross, but if you catch an infection early then none of it is all that bad.

    6. Re:Salt water flush by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A) If you do it too often or too long you damage your sinus
      B) If you don't use sterile water, you can die.
      C) no detected difference between sterile water and sterile water with salt.

      So, yeah it's been scientifically shown to work, when used correctly and for a short time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. Why is this news? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has been to the doctor for a sinus infection has been told that they are rarely bacterial in origin, and are almost exclusively viral.

    They give antibiotics as a precaution and as a placebo, as patients feel better taking *something*, regardless whether it is effective.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  26. quacks by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I inherited bad sinuses from my mother who occasionally gets wicked sinus infections and has to go on hardcore antibiotics, the kind that WIPE your digestive tract and turn your poo white.

    Fortunately for me genetics diluted the problem and I don't get one more than once a year usually. I've tried to tough it out, load up on decongestants and expectorants (due to drainage) etc and all that happens is it gets my throat torn up like hamburger from the infected runoff combined with coughing. Lucky me, I'm going through my yearly round of that right now actually. I started myself on decongestants immediately and have been pounding down pepsi almost nonstop to try to keep my sinuses and throat clear, but it still looks like the throat version of red-eye in there. I might actually beat it without antibiotics for the first time this time since I've jumped on it so aggressively.

    In the past it's usually been the same story. Try to use over-the-counter meds for a week, finally it is getting so bad that the yellow mucus overnight has my throat destroyed by morning. (which will improve somewhat during the day, but not enough, it's a losing battle day to night) Enough of those and I can't stop coughing and I sprint into the local "convenient care" before work and a random doc looks at me and prescribes a decongestant and expectorant (that cost 2x the OTC usually) saying he doesn't want to give me antibiotics YET. Thanks.

    So I'm back in the office 3-4 day later, almost unable to talk, haven't slept in days, throat killing me, and throat is totally red with green mucus streaking down in the back. "Ooooh! you have a bad sinus infection now! Here's some antibiotics!" Thanks. Now why couldn't we have just done this three days ago instead of putting me through two days of hell?

    So the last two times I went in I relayed the above story and they conceded maybe antibiotics before it gets REALLY bad is a good plan for me. And I was sooo thankful, instead of it taking several more days of winding down misery, another two weeks in all, one round of refills to clear up, it was much better the very next day and cleared up in 5 days, both times.

    Whoever says antibiotics don't help sinus infections is a quack. I seriously wonder what would happen to people like me if there were no antibiotics, could it get bad enough to hospitalize or kill me?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:quacks by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      could it get bad enough to hospitalize or kill me

      Easily, especially if the infection migrates into your cranium, which isn't too far away from your nasal sinuses...

    2. Re:quacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      May I suggest saline sinus washes? Use either a neti pot or a squeeze bottle. I sneered at them, but got desperate enough to try it after my ENT suggested them. (I use the NeilMed bottles.) It's not pleasant the first couple of times, but once you see the gunk that comes out, you'll be convinced.

    3. Re:quacks by sqldr · · Score: 1

      what kind of sinus infections are we talking about here? If it's the common cold, antibiotics won't do anything for you at all. It's a virus. I think I ONCE had a bacterial infection in my nose. In the form of a large spot in my nostril. Which I could put up with.

      I bloody hope doctors near you aren't giving out antibiotics for viral infections. That's basic common sense. In fact, should probably be illegal, given the damage it's doing.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    4. Re:quacks by squoozer · · Score: 1

      I'm just getting of a nasal infection for which the doc gave me Doxycycline, it's good a clearing up the infection but it makes me feel really sick for an hour after taking it. Anyway, I thought I had it bad but your annual event sounds terrible. Get well soon.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    5. Re:quacks by gknoy · · Score: 1

      My wife swears by the neti pot. It's pretty awesome when it works -- I can't seem to do it right, or something. But when it does work, my sinuses feel clear and dry. Thanks for the suggestion, I'm sure others might not have heard of it.

    6. Re:quacks by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You missed one of the finer point in the article. Despite the title in thread, the only thing this particular paper researched was the efficacy of amoxicillin on uncomplicated sinusitis. From your description, you have a more complex issue. And even for uncomplicated sinusitis, it doesn't discuss the efficacy or lack thereof for other antibiotics.

      Reading comprehension failure on the part of the media (it's getting wide press).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:quacks by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      The sinus infection he's describing (more than 10 days) is almost certainly bacterial.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    8. Re:quacks by v1 · · Score: 1

      what kind of sinus infections are we talking about here? If it's the common cold, antibiotics won't do anything for you at all.

      It's fairly obvious that these are bacterial infections, considering how effective the antibiotics always are for me.

      They've swabbed the back of my throat a few times (pick up a bit of the yellow or green goo to check) but I don't recall them ever getting back to me as to what they found. They may have been checking to make sure it wasn't viral.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    9. Re:quacks by Fned · · Score: 1

      Make sure you boil the shit out of the water before you neti, though, or you could get brain amoebas.

      Not Kidding.

    10. Re:quacks by nbauman · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly know whether the doxycycline is clearing up the infection or whether it would have gotten better anyway without it. The point of TFA is that it would have gotten better anyway.

    11. Re:quacks by simoncpu+was+here · · Score: 1

      Now why couldn't we have just done this three days ago instead of putting me through two days of hell?

      Yes, sinusitis is really uncomfortable for us, but let's be thankful that we only have sinusitis. If doctors will always prescribe antibiotics to sinusitis patients, then bacteria would evolve so fast that antibiotics would be useless to people with life-threatening conditions.

      Let's help the world be a better place by using antibiotics only as a last resort.

    12. Re:quacks by v1 · · Score: 1

      The one they usually give me is Cephalexin

      As of 2008, cefalexin was the most popular cephalosporin antibiotic in the United States, with more than 25 million prescriptions of its generic versions alone, for US$255 million in sales (though less popular than two other antibiotics, amoxicillin and azithromycin, each with 50 million prescriptions per year).

      At least I'm not alone. Looks like it came out way back in 1967. I've always heard people complaining that if antibiotics were commonly used they'd become less effective over time. But this one's been around for a long time and is in widespread use... so doesn't seem to support their argument much, tho in theory it makes sense.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    13. Re:quacks by raind · · Score: 1

      Your kidding right? you drink Pepsi to help? Who's the quack...

      --
      Get up!
    14. Re:quacks by SysDaemon · · Score: 1

      A Chinese friend told me to cut out sugary drinks (Pepsi/fruit juices) if you have congestion. Dairy is not a problem. 180 from what I learned but experimentation confirmed it for a study sample of one. (And for a cold don't take vitamin C until you have recovered, but that's a virus infection rather than a bacterial sinusitis.)

    15. Re:quacks by hillbilly1980 · · Score: 2

      Neti Pot. I used to have constant infections until I picked up one of these at the drug store. Boiled water that you let cool a bit and add on of it's little salt packets. Bing Bang Done! After 3 months of regular use I dialed down so i only do it once or twice a year when i have symptoms, but i went from constant throat and nose infections to the odd cough and sore throat a couple times a year.

      --
      If you can't fix it ask the 3 year old down the street.
    16. Re:quacks by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Buy a gallon of sterile water from Wal-mart and use it. Yeah after you open it it isn't sterile any longer but not much worry about getting an infection from bugs in the water.

    17. Re:quacks by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My allergy/virus issues RESULT in bacterial infections. It is virtually inevitable for me to develop a bacterial infection when congestion from an allergic reaction occurs, which isn't the least bit unusual from what doctors have told me almost all my life.

      Go back in your corner, stupid git.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    18. Re:quacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Another good reason not to drink tap water.

      We only use reverse-osmosis filtered water in this house. The only thing tap water is good for is flushing toilets and washing dishes.

    19. Re:quacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      When the stuff you're blowing out of your nose is dark yellow or even green, it's a bacterial infection.

    20. Re:quacks by v1 · · Score: 1

      Your kidding right? you drink Pepsi to help? Who's the quack...

      You obviously have little or no experience with sinus infections. I've got lots. The sinuses drain almost nonstop (day and night) down the back of the throat. Before the infection really sets in, the sinus draining produces a yellow (basically snot/phlegm) slick down the back of the throat that is irritating but tolerable.

      When the sinus infection gets going, this yellow slick turns green and now the back of your throat has a bacteria-compress on it continuously, and that leads quickly to a throat infection, which causes a hacking cough, the combination of which quickly tears up the throat. All of this means you cough continuously, have a really sore throat, and get zero sleep.

      Pepsi isn't too far off from battery acid, but the stomach will tolerate it. It's capable of breaking down a lot of things, including the phlegm streak on the back of the throat produced by the draining sinuses. I knew it might be able to help, so this time around I gave it a go, and it's actually working a lot better than expected. I've been able to take more decongestants because I can keep my throat clear, and I hope that will flush out the brewing sinus infection before it gets out of control. Though I forgot to bring a stock of pepsi to work today, I'll be grabbing a large size mcd's here in a bit to continue to keep the phlegm washed out of the back of my throat.

      The pepsi will become a lot more important if the infection gets worse, to keep my throat clear of infected phlegm. But I don't know if my body can eventually evict a full blown sinus infection without antibiotics, I've never really had an opportunity to hold out for more than a few days to find out.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    21. Re:quacks by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      After several recommendations from a friend I finally tried the "nasal douche" and I've become a believer. I've got both the Neti pot and squeeze bottle. I like the squeeze bottle best.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    22. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      No, don't buy anything from Walmart.

    23. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      FUD.

    24. Re:quacks by sqldr · · Score: 1

      no it isn't. Unless you have a citation?

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    25. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I had heard that if it is that color, the infection is passing, and that clear was a sign that the infection was still live.

    26. Re:quacks by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      OK go to your local supermarket and buy a gallon of sterile or distilled water. An I agree on avoiding Walmart, just a slip of the keyboard. 18 months and counting since entering a Walmart.

    27. Re:quacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're a moron. The previous comment has a link showing that tap water is dangerous because it contains microbes that have actually killed people in many instances. How the fuck do you call that safe?

      Idiot.

    28. Re:quacks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depends on location.
      And, snorting water through your nose is completely different then drinking it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:quacks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      YOU are the moron.

      Pouring water through your sinus is completely different then drinking it. Did you even read that link?

      Idiot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:quacks by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Because the microbes in question have to be inserted deep into your sinuses (as with a neti pot) for them to have a chance of doing anything to you. That's a far cry from drinking them (at which time they will do absolutely nothing).

      Here in San Francisco we have some of the best tap water in the country. I drink it by the gallon.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    31. Re:quacks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Don't be a believe based on person experience.
      In this case, the science backs occasion use of this method, assuming you are using sterile water.
      To much use will damage your nose.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:quacks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Pepsi isn't too far off from battery acid,"
      you're an idiot.

      "t. It's capable of breaking down a lot of things"
      the 70s called, they want their urban myth back. I ahve shown this to be incorrect dozens of time with dozens of materials.

      A lot of liquids will have the effect. If you enjoy Pepsi fine, but don't give it ore credit then, say, water.

      As a side not. One human being to another: stop drinking sugary sodas, you awe basically setting the table for diabetics. I know, I know, diet sodas suck, but get used to it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:quacks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      oh, a Chinese friend. well that's all I need!

      I had a Chinese whore tell me I had the biggest dick she had ever seen! So, clearly it's true because she is Chinese! Why do people think the Chinese are some sore of magic wizard fairies?

      Don't take any vitamins unless you are deficient; otherwise your just peeing money away. Except for a view vitamin where overdosing will kill you.

      Diary doesn't help, and it can make it worse. Stop giving stupid advice.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:quacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Fuck off, asshole. If water has dangerous microbes in it, I don't care if it's less dangerous than snorting it, I'm still not going to drink that shit. Would you drink untreated river water? It has the same microbes in it.

      Fuck off, asshole.

    35. Re:quacks by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly know whether the doxycycline is clearing up the infection or whether it would have gotten better anyway without it.

      Yes I damn well can. This article is sensationalist and borderline dangerous.

      A number of years ago I developed a strange problem. Every time I ate, about 20 minutes later I would develop a headache. This was a weird headache -- it was dull, throbbing, restricted to one side of my head, but had no other apparent symptoms (like, no visual effects or other things that might be associated with migraines). I had no history of regular headaches before.

      I assumed it was some kind of reaction to something I was eating. I began modifying my diet. I cut out coffee. I cut out alcohol. I started looking on the Internet for foods that were commonly known allergy triggers and eliminating them. Nothing seemed to make any difference -- or, if one day I seemed to feel better, the next day I'd eat the same thing and feel worse.

      After a couple of weeks of this, the headaches had become really bad. I would eat lunch at my desk, and afterward I'd have to go to the break room and lie down for a half hour or so, just for the headache to subside enough for me to be able to concentrate on my computer screen again. After maybe three and a half weeks, I broke down and went to the doctor.

      The first thing the doctor said was, "The good news is it's not a brain tumor." (I didn't really think it was a brain tumor.) Then he asked me whether I had noticed any fever. I said no. He said, "That's odd, because you have a fever right now." He said I had a sinus infection, prescribed me antibiotics, and I went home and dutifully started taking them. I had no history of sinus infections.

      BLAM! It was maybe the second, maybe the third day of antibiotics that I felt completely fine. Naturally I kept taking the antibiotics (always finish the whole bottle, kids), but this was one of those cases where I hadn't even realized how sick I was until I got better,

      All of a sudden, miraculously, I had energy again. It had never really occurred to me that the reason I was coming home from work, throwing down my jacket, and crashing onto the couch and lying there all night without eating dinner wasn't just because I knew eating dinner would give me a headache, but because I had no more energy to do another single thing. For the last few weeks, I realized, I had been feeling drained, depressed, and weak -- and all of a sudden, it was as if you pulled a bag off my head and showed me sunlight for the first time.

      There is not one thing you could say to convince me that antibiotics were not the cure to my condition, or that it would have gone away by itself if I had not taken antibiotics.

      Do people often pressure their doctors to give them antibiotics for infections that turn out to be viral? Yes. Does that mean that there's no such thing as a bacterial sinus infection -- as this article seems to be claiming? No. Absolute bullshit. And for this article to present the findings of this study the way it does is irresponsible and does an incredible disservice to people like me, who are either too scared or just too fucking dumb to go to the doctor until they've been suffering for a month.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    36. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      How much does that stuff cost anyway? A friend used to use it for humidifiers as our water has a mineral problem that messes up the ultrasonic humidifiers.

    37. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Get a clue. NYC has some of the best water in the country, and Newark's water (where I live) is no slouch either. Bottled water is wasteful (plastic, shipping, etc.) and is in many case convincing you to pay for someone else's tap water that's been filtered. If you really have a concern, treat your water. If not, you're buying into something that's fucking all of us over and that is a waste of money and resources.

      Read a water test. This stuff is safe.

    38. Re:quacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the water in Louisiana is NOT safe, as seen in the article. Here in Phoenix, the water tastes like shit, and they even had an incident where it was contaminated with some kind of industrial solvents and they were warning everyone not to drink it. Not exactly confidence-inspiring. Maybe the water is good in NYC, but NYC isn't even remotely representative of the entire nation (esp. backwards places like LA).

      I get all my water from reverse-osmosis machines for $0.20/gallon. There's no way I'd trust tap water.

      I'm surprised your water in Newark is any good, though. The whole place looks like an industrial wasteland.

    39. Re:quacks by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Hilarious quote:

      "The first one could have been a fluke," Ratard told Shots. But now that we have a second one, the only explanation is the use of the neti pot."

      I guess they didn't realize when they said it that a fluke is another kind of parasite.

    40. Re:quacks by bipbop · · Score: 1

      My old doctor told me this, too. But like most things doctors tell me, I've learned to trust it about as far as I can throw it.

      Here's a citation to the contrary (that is to say, agreeing with you), from the NIH: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003051.htm I'm not sure where to begin searching the literature, so I'll pretend that link proves the point for the time being!

    41. Re:quacks by bipbop · · Score: 1

      Diet soda does suck. How can people stand to put that stuff in their mouths? It must be less horrifying to them than me, I suppose.

      If I had to choose between soda and diet soda, I'd only drink soda, even though it'd be awful for me. Fortunately, that's not actually the choice I have to make! I prefer to drink water most of the time, and tea the rest.

    42. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      The industrial part of Newark looks like an industrial wasteland. I suspect you have not actually seen the city -- driving by on the Turnpike does not suffice.

      Newark was a hub for breweries back in the day and realized it would have a need for lots of high quality water. All of Newark's water comes from north-western-ish NJ: http://ejmeeker.org/water.aspx

    43. Re:quacks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I just took the bus from Manhattan to the Newark airport. I didn't realize we had such horrible-looking places here in the USA (well, except for southern Chicago, but even that was a lot better than Newark); I thought I had been teleported into a dystopian future or something.

    44. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is not Newark. That is an industrial area that happens to be inside city limits (lots of it decaying/disused that was much better looking before the US basically lost all of its manufacturing). This is Newark: http://www.ronsaari.com/stockImages/newJersey/NewarkSkylineAtDuskPanoramic.jpg

    45. Re:quacks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, you want to see someplace really sad: the area along the northeast corridor rail tracks just north of the Baltimore station. Blocks and blocks of abandoned and falling down rowhouses. Sad to look at -- must have one day been bustling.

    46. Re:quacks by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Very profound. I think my comment was worded poorly. I didn't blindly do this after someone's urging. I read up about the practice, then about the implementations, and finally after investing, I read the directions. Too much of anything is never good. For your information, it's not a daily routine and personal experience backs up what science (and thousands of years) has proven. I'm using (cooled) boiled bottled water + salts a few days while I was sick and had a good response from it.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    47. Re:quacks by AmaDaden · · Score: 1

      I know this story is a bit old but I just have to comment. I get frequent sinus infections and have not taken antibiotics in years. Further more I've only taken 1 sick day in the past 2 years. I'm not a doctor but this is how I think this all works. Antibiotics are delivered by the blood, under normal conditions your blood does not empty in to your sinuses. This is why at the START of an infection they do nothing. But once an infection gets bad; like I have a fever, headache, and I might pass out bad, that is when the infection has broken down the wall of your sinus and is getting in to your blood. At that point they can quickly work as you have noted. You may have noticed that a day or two before your feel better you see some blood in some very very colorful mucous. The green/yellow/white mucus is the infection, the blood is where it connected to the wall of your sinuses.

      So what I do is as soon as I feel my nose get stuffy(not blocked just a little hard to breathe) and my mind not working at 100% (this is NOT easy to notice. It's taken me years to get close to right on this) I start to take long (Typically an hour) hot (as hot as I can with out it hurting) showers and use sinus rinses to try and push out the gunk. This is all to loosen the infection so i can get it out before it grows big enough to get me really sick.

      FYI: Be careful when doing the rinses, if the water is not boiled or distilled you could get something worse from it. I also stay clear of decongestants, they seem to dry my nose out. This will only keep things there longer since dry mucous is sticky mucous.

    48. Re:quacks by v1 · · Score: 1

      sounds like good advice. I think I'm over the hump this time, I still have a stuffy nose but I think I've beaten it this time around.

      . I also stay clear of decongestants, they seem to dry my nose out. This will only keep things there longer since dry mucous is sticky mucous.

      In my case my sinuses have very narrow passages in them. From what I can tell, decongestants thin the mucus, and helps it drain out of my sinuses easier. Without them, my entire nasal passage gets clogged up like glue and my final misery usually winds me up breathing through my mouth exclusively. Though I don't know how much of that is clogging with mucus and how much is from my sinuses swelling. I've even been able to get some relief in the past by managing to get straws up into my nostrils so I could breathe through my nose when trying to sleep. The swelling blocks my nose mainly near the nostrils.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  27. Antibiotics for sinus infection? by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Even if they can cure it, aren't antibiotics reserved for serious illnesses that can't be cured by other means? You can cure a cold dozens of other ways without breeding a new strain of resistent bacteria, what the hell is wrong with you Americans?

  28. PSA: use saline nasal spray and salt water gargle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you feel any sinus pressure or notice any drainage, gargle with warm salt water, and use saline nasal spray.
    If the pressure is acute, take a nasal decongestant.

    If you do the above early enough, you will stop getting sinus infections.

    p.s. PRO-TIP: You can refill nasal spray bottles with filtered water and table salt.

  29. Re:Fully loaded with bullcrap by tmosley · · Score: 1

    20% of patients continued to have symptoms after ten days in each case, by my reading. This indicates to me the formation of a strong biofilm, which antibiotics will be next to useless against.

    Also, slashdot was never great. It's not much different now than it has been for the last ten years, except that now there are a lot fewer dupe articles.

  30. there's your problem... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I sprint into the local " convenient care " before work and a random doc looks at me and prescribes a decongestant and expectorant (that cost 2x the OTC usually) saying he doesn't want to give me antibiotics YET. Thanks.

    So I'm back in the office 3-4 day later, almost unable to talk, haven't slept in days, throat killing me, and throat is totally red with green mucus streaking down in the back. "Ooooh! you have a bad sinus infection now! Here's some antibiotics!" Thanks. Now why couldn't we have just done this three days ago instead of putting me through two days of hell?

    So the last two times I went in I relayed the above story and they conceded maybe antibiotics before it gets REALLY bad is a good plan for me. And I was sooo thankful, instead of it taking several more days of winding down misery, another two weeks in all, one round of refills to clear up, it was much better the very next day and cleared up in 5 days, both times.

    Maybe if you established a relationship with a regular GP or ENT Dr, maybe he would become familiar with your history and not wait to prescribe the antibiotics?

    (cue flamefest from people who don't have health insurance...)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:there's your problem... by pavon · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you established a relationship with a regular GP or ENT Dr, maybe he would become familiar with your history and not wait to prescribe the antibiotics?

      My fiance's family doctor who she had been seeing her whole childhood did the same thing. Every winter she would get a bad sinus infection, but he wouldn't prescribe antibiotics until the second trip, even if they waited until it was really bad the first trip. Same with doctor she saw during college for 6 years.

    2. Re:there's your problem... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why did your fiance continue seeing such an incompetent doctor? Seems to me that the first time is necessary. The second time is understandable. But the third time, you should tell the doc that this has happened twice before. If he's not prepared to write a prescription, don't go back.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:there's your problem... by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you established a relationship with a regular GP or ENT Dr, maybe he would become familiar with your history and not wait to prescribe the antibiotics?

      My fiance's family doctor who she had been seeing her whole childhood did the same thing. Every winter she would get a bad sinus infection, but he wouldn't prescribe antibiotics until the second trip, even if they waited until it was really bad the first trip. Same with doctor she saw during college for 6 years.

      This would make me switch my doctor. I want someone who knows me enough to trust when I can self-diagnose, and acts as a (knowledgeable) medical partner. At my clinic, I know the provider very well, and he is often very cautious about prescribing things but trusts me when I come in once every year or so and I say, "I've got a sinus infection - here are my symptoms, tried nasal rinsing, tried decongestants - nothings been working for a couple of weeks".

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  31. BRAINSSSSSSS.... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I'll just leave this here...


    Moral of the story, if you live in a third-world country without a safe drinking water supply, like Louisiana , you might want to boil your water before filling your sinuses up with it with a neti pot. Or else you might get a bad case of microscopic brain-eating monsters.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:BRAINSSSSSSS.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The drinking water is safe to drink...it's not safe to put through your nose... you do realize different places in your body have different things, right?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Manuka honey! by rak-wolf · · Score: 2

    Thats kind of like saying exercise is dangerous because someone in Louisiana was run over while jogging down the middle of the interstate. Amoebas are dangerous even if you drink them.

    My doc irrigates himself, and says it works best with Manuka honey.

    1. Re:Manuka honey! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I said "improperly done", idiot.

      Filling up my nasal passages with /honey/ does not pass the squick filter.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Manuka honey! by rak-wolf · · Score: 1

      And I'm saying you're just fear mongering. The incident isn't even worth mentioning, other than to say "Holy flying Jesus! They have amoebas in their drinking water!" It wouldn't make a difference if they were swimming in it or giving themselves enemas. That crap will kill you. As for the other thing, I now desperately want to see someone put pure honey up their nose. Just to clarify, you dissolve the honey in water at just the right proportion to balance out the salinity of your interstitial fluid. I can't remember the proportions, but it should be easy to look up. You're supposed to use Manuka honey because it has some fairly amazing antibiotic properties.

  33. missed business opportunity by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I guess it's too late for someone to trademark and market Placebo? How much more should they charge for higher dosages? You can't get in trouble with the FDA as long as you make no claims of efficacy for any particular malady, right?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  34. Eat shit, not yogurt by nbauman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your intestine has about a kilogram of symbiotic bacteria, with dozens of major species and hundreds of minor species. When you take antibiotics, you wipe out some or most of those species.

    The bacteria in yogurt (usually a single species) are completely different. You can't repopulate the normal bacteria of your intestine with yogurt.

    Nobody knows exactly how bacteria repopulate the bowel, but one thing you could try is a fecal transplant -- in other words, eat shit. This is not a standard medical procedure, but it's under serious investigation.

    One of the problems with destroying the normal gut flora with antibiotics is that the gut is a major immunological organ. The immune system (all those white blood cells) has to decide whether a bacterial species is a normal symbiote or a pathogen, which is difficult and inaccurate. If you wipe out the normal flora and start again, your immune system might make mistakes.

    Nobody knows what causes autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, Crohn's, inflammatory bowel disease, etc., but wiping out the normal gut flora with antibiotics is a plausible mechanism.

    So using antibiotics when you don't need them, in addition to promoting antibiotic resistance, might give you one of those horrible autoimmune diseases.

    1. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      A kilogram? Where did you get that number? Your intestine contains approximately 1 x 10^11 gram negative bacteria per ml, however I hardly think they make up a kilogram.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what the appendix is for? Repopulating gut flora?

    3. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Good point. There are some good arguments for that.

      When antibiotics wipe out your gut bacteria, does that include the appendix too? I assume it does, but I don't know for sure.

      There are also a lot of immune tissue in the appendix. I wonder what's going on in there.

    4. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      Sure... but it evolved to do that after a major intestinal purge, not a course of antibiotics, which kill bacteria "protected" inside the appendix just fine.

    5. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by suutar · · Score: 1

      I had thought a fecal transplant was more along the lines of a suppository than a consumable. It seems more direct than going through the acid bath...

    6. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Make sure it doesn't turn you blue. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria

      Unless you want to be blue.

    7. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by skapaft · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't do this.

      As far as I know, colloidal silver has not been proven to have any beneficial effect. It can however make you look like a smurf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria

    8. Re:Eat shit, not yogurt by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      1 x 10^11 = 100,000,000,000.
      If that's grams of bacteria, that's 100 Million kilograms!

      And it's common knowledge that the majority of the bacteria in the gut is good for you, not negative.

  35. Re:Fully loaded with bullcrap by tmosley · · Score: 1

    I'm not a doctor, but I don't think viral infections last that long, and fungal disease is quite separate, and would be very VERY messy. If the doctors can't tell the difference between an infection and an allergy, then they must be voodoo witch doctors.

  36. My problem is that if I get a Sinus infection and by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    don't treat it; the it spreads to my lungs. I can handle a stuffy head but not being able to breath properly at all is just unbearable.

  37. Alternative for antibiotic by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    I have a lot of experience on this subject: p>

    I get 1 or 2 sinus infections a year and the antibiotics don't work for me. With that said, i found out that Pseudoephedrine is far better for me because it reduced my sinuses and relieved the pressure that goe's along with it and i just rode what pain i had for 3 to 5 days so the sinus cavity could dry out and i would be fine.

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  38. try this instead. way safer and quicker by rs79 · · Score: 1

    I used to get "sinus infections" a lot up until 5 years ago. Usually in the spring and the fall. Doc said it's cause of all the mold in the air then. *cillin isn't that useful for this and the last time he gave me Ciprio. Awful stuff. Makes you utterly lactose intolerent and one bowl of clam chowder let me now what cholera must feel like.

    Turns out though, that oregano oil is chesaper, safer, quicker and more effective than any antibiotics I've ever tried. I don't even get them any more. But, everyone who has a "head cold" - which is often how a sinus infection presents, should try this.

    Oregano oil is really really strong. This does bit a little, but you fell better pretty much immediatly. Oregano oil is one of the strongest anti fungals known, it's anti-viral and kills bacteria so well a recent university of bristol (?) study fond it not only kills MRSA (as Mayo found out) but does do so in stupid low concentrations.

    It's also good in pizza and/or spaghetti sauce. Use one drop.

    Here's how you treat your sinuses with it: http://rs79.vrx.net/opinions/ideas/medicine/oregano/sinus/

    Notes:
    1) all synthetic medicine has side effects. avoid antibiotics if you can
    2) i've seen more bad advice on this page than I'm even used to on /. - wow.
    3) make sure you get organic oregano oil. when you concentrate things this much any traces of pesticide or what have you become significant. you want to avoid that.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
    1. Re:try this instead. way safer and quicker by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I use grapefruit seed oil in a nasal irrigator, but switched to an antibiotic ointment last time and it worked just as well (but without the bitter aftertaste). The logic makes sense, though I'm surprised there's enough of anything in the steam of the linked article to actually do anything.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  39. Re:Here's a link to the actual study at JAMA's sit by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Here's the rub. Part B) isn't likely to be correct. I'm hedging because the science behind that statement is rather iffy but:

    If you attempt to isolate bacteria from either the nasal turbinates (the boggy things in your nose) or the sinuses themselves in the first week or so of an infection, you very rarely grow anything. Note that the study started antibiotics early, typically around day 3. If you wait longer, you pick up more bacteria but still you don't pick it up all of the time, even in chronic sinus infections.

    The lack of bacterial cultures in early sinusitis can be due to a couple of things: 1) There are no bacteria - it's viral 2) You aren't culturing the right bacteria - clinical studies typically only attempt to grow the usual suspects. Finding a 'new' bacterium is rather difficult. 3) You're doing it wrong (not obtaining or growing the culture correctly, basically lab error) 4) The bacteria are causing a problem but aren't found where you were looking (say in a biofilm or in the bone as is found in chronic sinusitis).

    Unfortunately, I don't have electronic access to JAMA and I think I tossed that issue. My hissy fit morning mental states makes we want to state that it's a pretty weak article and certainly getting more press than is due. It's really clear that the media is hyping this way too much.

    I think I'll go for a walk now. I feel happy....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  40. Useless article by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Useless, because it makes no mention of the difference between viral and bacterial "sinus infections". If, by "sinus infections", we mean upper respiratory infections, then the vast majority of those are viral and will not respond to antibiotics (duh...). I find it hard to believe that a credible study would fail to make this distinction, but it's impossible to tell from TFA. Then again, the will-nilly prescription of antibiotics when patients demand it, even when the clinical picture says "virus", is all too common, so who knows.

  41. Lost my sense of smell! Thanks, Doc! by littlewink · · Score: 1

    I went in with sinusitis. I couldn't smell anything. Doc give me an antibiotic. Went on a two-week trip out west. The antibiotic did nothing for the sinusitis and I foolishly took it to completion. By the end of the trip I had a raging infection.

    Another doctor prescribes Zithromax. In 5 days sinusitis is gone and so is my sense of smell.

    Seems the first antibiotic killed every bug except the one causing the infection, allowing it to take over my entire schnozola. The second antibiotic killed that bug off. But for some reason I retain some congestion.

    my sense of smell sensors are intact - I occasionally can smell or, if I snort, I can sometimes smell. Helluva way to eat with friends: snort, eat, snort, eat.

    1. Re:Lost my sense of smell! Thanks, Doc! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I had a terrible case of sinusitis several months ago. I tried to wait it out to avoid taking an antibiotic, but it wasn't going away, so I finally saw a doctor. The doc prescribed what I believe is the same thing you refer to, Zithromax, the 5-pill treatment. That wiped it out very quickly. You need to fire the previous doc that gave you the wrong antibiotic.

  42. Re:Here's a link to the actual study at JAMA's sit by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

    It's dated 2/15/12 - I would guess you don't have it yet, as opposed to tossing it already (?)

  43. Everyone knows that by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

    When I presented with a chronic sinus infection the doctor told me that antibiotics were pretty much useless against infections in this part of the body because it was mainly in the mucus and there was no blood-flow in mucus so the ABs couldn't properly permeate that medium.

    Never the less, he gave me a course of ciprofloxacin which, I'm told, is one of the "least ineffective" ABs for this kind of infection -- and one with some nasty side-effects.

    The infection did abate for a while but (despite the fact I took a 2-week course) it came back.

    With nothing to lose, I decided to try a natural remedy which is an "over the counter" supplement containing garlic and horseradish.

    Voila!

    It hasn't totally killed the infection but keeps it at such a very low level that you wouldn't know it was there. However, if I stop taking the pills I can feel the infection returning so I just pop a pill every couple of days and my quality of life is restored - with no side effects (it's odorless garlic).

    I'm not one of these "save the planet hippy fad anti-establishment alternative therapy" types -- but sometimes I think we are just too quick to accept that hi-tech drugs are the only answer to problems.

    1. Re:Everyone knows that by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 1

      The blood-flow argument was also why my doctor told me that antibiotics wouldn't cure my formerly-chronic sinus infections, although they can help to keep it from spreading through your body.

      What I started doing, at my doctor's suggestion, was regular sinus irrigation with a simple buffered saline solution. This isn't the hippy-dippy neti-pot thing, it's an 8-oz squeeze bottle that you use to force a stream of the solution in one nostril and out the other. It's a bit messy, but I found that by incorporating this into my daily hygiene ritual, my formerly-seasonal, formerly-debilitating sinusitis is much milder, and sometimes skips a season entirely.

      Part of what I like about this approach is that it's completely clear how it works, it's just lavage. No mystery drugs with side-effects, *and* no new-agey holistic malarky either.

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
  44. Virus? by techgeek0279 · · Score: 1

    I guess it's more viral than bacterial. A lady who suffers from chronic sinus infections says hot showers work for her. Here's a video on the research that was conducted to indicate that antibiotics do not work to tackle sinus infections. http://www.patexia.com/feed/video-commonly-prescribed-antibiotics-not-effective-for-sinus-infections-2729

  45. Yeah, but bacterial infections often follow by bytesex · · Score: 1

    The pattern is: a sinus infection clogs your nose somehow. Then you start breathing through your mouth. Then your throat gets irritated so you cough. Then you damage your throat, or your bronchiae, and then a bacteria moves in. And Amoxicilin *does* work against those.

    Moral of the story ? Keep your nose clean and drink lots of water. Just like your moma said you should.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  46. Is it the meds or is it selection bias? by Spyder · · Score: 1

    I get infections an average of once a year. About 2/3s of the time I can fight them off with a combination of rest, sinus irrigation, and antihistamines. When that fails, I do not get better without a course of antibiotics. I have waited weeks to months before going to the doctor for the prescription. In my case I strongly doubt that it's a placebo effect.

    This leads me to ask if the problem is one of selection, meaning that maybe doctors are either writing prescriptions too soon or they need another data point to make an accurate diagnosis.

    --
    Spyder
  47. Re:Here's a link to the actual study at JAMA's sit by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    I toss stuff pretty fast these days. Especially JAMA....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  48. Made a difference for me, but not just yoghurt by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    When treatment for Lyme disease wrecked my bowels, I went to the health food store and bought every damn live thing they had on the shelves. Yoghurt, kombucha, goat cheese, all kinds of weird stuff that tasted funny. Only criteria was that it should be alive.

    It took me a couple of days to eat it all, and some of it was pretty stinky. I drank water right out of the stream outside my house to wash it down.

    It was very unscientific because I didn't measure anything, but it worked. Kind of russian roulette approach, but I was in some distress at the time and willing to gamble. Mainstream medicine did not have any effective cure.

    1. Re:Made a difference for me, but not just yoghurt by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      The area has been densely populated for 300 years. The stream's thoroughly loaded with bacteria that originally came out of human digestive tracts. You can see the shattered bits of drainage tile from septic fields exposed in the stream banks where the course has changed over the years.

      Sounds icky, I know, but humans are evolved to drink free-running water, so I knew it wouldn't kill me, and I was in some major distress from having my gut flora completely destroyed by broad-spectrum antibiotics.

      We have healthy populations of deer, raccoon, ducks, opossum, geese, and fox that get all their water from the stream.

  49. No shit by brilanon · · Score: 1

    I tried amoxicillin for my sinus infection in its first year. Nothing happened, bar placebo effects, and now the infection is four years old and nothing can touch it. Maybe it's fungal. Maybe not. I just hope at least surgery can remove it, one day. It's annoying

  50. Turn your head sideways by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Turn your head sideways, and run the salt water in from the top nostril and out the bottom. Gravity does the work for you.
    Then flip around and run it the other direction. Give your nose a good blow and you will feel great.
    If it burns too much, add more salt to the water. A bulb syringe works fine. I often find them in the baby section.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  51. Ever tried a nasal rinse? by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Fortunately for me genetics diluted the problem and I don't get one more than once a year usually. I've tried to tough it out, load up on decongestants and expectorants (due to drainage) etc and all that happens is it gets my throat torn up like hamburger from the infected runoff combined with coughing. Lucky me, I'm going through my yearly round of that right now actually. I started myself on decongestants immediately and have been pounding down pepsi almost nonstop to try to keep my sinuses and throat clear, but it still looks like the throat version of red-eye in there. I might actually beat it without antibiotics for the first time this time since I've jumped on it so aggressively.

    As someone who has similar (but milder) seasonal issues, I'm wondering... do you rinse [1] your nostrils? Do you keep your house air clean (HEPA or whole-house filter)? How about cortico-steriods [2]?

    I've also found much relief with some anti-allergens like cetirizine, which also reduce inflammation.

    [1] http://www.neilmed.com/usa/sinusrinse.php
    [2] http://allergies.about.com/od/noseandsinusallergies/a/nasalsprays.htm

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Ever tried a nasal rinse? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I DO run a pair of holmes 3500 humidifiers here to keep the humidity between 30-50%. It fluctuates quite a bit during the winter days because of the cycle of furnace activity between daytime and nighttime. I got the second unit so it'd catch up faster in the morning after the heat kicked on. I do keep my furnace filter changed regularly but don't use any of the expensive filters.

      No I don't rinse my nostrils.

      My sinus problems aren't allergy-based. They just plain have issues. Not sure exactly what. I've heard horror stories of what my mom went through when she was younger, she had cases of having to pull dried mucus out of her nostrils in strips. Glad mine's not that bad. I think I just have issues with my sinuses being a little more restrictive than usual, plus they are prone to swelling up if irritated, closing my sinus passages, creating a sealed environment for bacteria to grow in.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Ever tried a nasal rinse? by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I DO run a pair of holmes 3500 humidifiers here to keep the humidity between 30-50%. It fluctuates quite a bit during the winter days because of the cycle of furnace activity between daytime and nighttime. I got the second unit so it'd catch up faster in the morning after the heat kicked on. I do keep my furnace filter changed regularly but don't use any of the expensive filters.

      If I may be so bold, I'd recommend you do consider something better than the basic filtration. We own our house, and have had really good experience with a electronic whole house filter, but even when we were renting we used 3M Filtrete 1500+ or MR13+ rated filters and found vast improvement over Filtrete 1200 or MR10 (which is probabably better than the basic 300 or 600/MR7). We also have one of these [1] for each bedroom (they don't sell those anymore, though).

      No I don't rinse my nostrils.

      I strongly recommend you try it... I know at least a dozen folks I've converted to doing this occasionally

      My sinus problems aren't allergy-based. They just plain have issues. Not sure exactly what. I've heard horror stories of what my mom went through when she was younger, she had cases of having to pull dried mucus out of her nostrils in strips. Glad mine's not that bad. I think I just have issues with my sinuses being a little more restrictive than usual, plus they are prone to swelling up if irritated, closing my sinus passages, creating a sealed environment for bacteria to grow in.

      Again, I'd strongly recommend you see an ENT, or if that's not possible, to do some experimentation with nasal rinses and stronger air purification... my daughter had these issues when she was younger, and now she's familiar with the rinsing and we make sure the house air is as clean as possible (we do run humidifiers during the winter, also).

      [1] http://www.air-purifier-power.com/vornado-aqs35.html

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  52. Oh please by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Any doctor that says this:
    "I take it you are familiar with evidence-based medicine? It’s the increasingly accepted approach for making clinical decisions about how to treat a patient. "
    Is not to be trusted with new science discoveries.
    http://bacteriality.com/2008/04/13/wolcott/

    He found some correlation, then assumed it was correct. Whenever something he thinks doesn't work, he blames the system.

    Maybe he is on to something, but no one else seems to eb able to repeat what he claims, and he isn't really using in rigorous testing I could find..not that the lack of science has prevented him from practicing it.

    walks like a duck.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Oh please by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Boy, aren't you a little bitch. I invite you to insult him to the face of the several hundred people who's lower limbs he has saved when other doctors said they needed to be amputated.

      What the fuck is wrong with you? People who believe in evidence based medicine are not to be trusted? What are you, a fucking witch doctor?

  53. Re:Long time listener, first time caller by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    I take amoxicillin quite frequently for a certain reason (no, I'm not a porn star). I got the world's most annoying headache after my gf at the time went to the doctor for sinus problems.

    Next day, she's perfect and I'm miserable. As it should be, right? Well, we aren't married.

    Asked her what she took, azithromycin. I rummaged around in my pharmacy (I'm not perfectly healthy year round) and found a spare course. Took it, next day I'm perfect. I finished the course, of course of course.

    I was already on Moxy, and it didn't stop nor prevent the problem. Zith did.

    On a side note, I started a course of Moxy, and realized I didn't have enough. Before the doc got me set up with more, I went without for a few days. I don't want to be gross, but I got the most incredible fountain-butt diarrhea I can remember. Garden hose blasts with nothing more solid than Hi-C. I dig back in my stash and quickly fix the "traveller's diarrhea" I caused myself, with Xifaxan.

    Antibiotics, used correctly, are quite possibly the wonder drugs of the 20th century, based on the number of lives and limbs saved. Used incorrectly, we will go extinct.

    I just wish they would test for bacteria first. Obviously you needed them, but it's hard to tell from symptoms alone. I keep reading about faster and cheaper genetic testing. Or labs on a chip. When do we get the instant virus/bacterium differentiator?

  54. List of bestselling drugs by NewYork · · Score: 1
  55. Amoxicillin for sinus by BundyGil · · Score: 1

    Talk about bullshit research. Any doctor who prescribes amoxicillin for sinus should be struck off. Any competent doctor already knew this without research as it is quite apparent every time they had a sinus culture done.

  56. Vinegar is a magic remedy for the throat by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    I feel for you. I get a similar (but apparently not as intense) sinus infection about once a year. In the past I have tried to avoid antibiotics as much as possible, but sometimes resistance really is futile, unfortunately. If I can't keep it under control it ends up going down to my chest then I end up with bronchitis.

    Anyway, among the many things that I do to try to keep it under control are the antihistamines and decongestants like you. I also use the neti pot nasal rinse like many others have mentioned in their responses to you.

    However, as far as your throat infection goes, or actually any throat infection regardless if it's from a sinus infection, the BEST thing that I've ever found for it, and I'm surprised no one has mentioned it yet, is apple cider vinegar. Look it up for more details, but I basically cover the bottom of a cup or mug with the vinegar (in other words, about a 1-2mm layer) and then almost fill up the rest of the cup with lukewarm water, and then gargle with it. Alternate with having a drink of it too (it's good for you in several ways). Make sure to brush and rinse your teeth afterward so it doesn't damage the enamel. It stings/burns to do it but you will be amazed at the results. At least for isolated throat infections it gets rid of them within a day or two.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Vinegar is a magic remedy for the throat by v1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the idea, I'll give that a try next time things get that far. lets hope no time soon...

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  57. Re:Article is Bull-Loaney by wonderboss · · Score: 1

    It's nice to hear from someone who has it worse than me.. Most of my colds turn into
    sinus infections which can hold on for many weeks. Antibiotics clear them up within
    days.

    --
    more cowbell