Slashdot Mirror


Man Digs Out Basement Using Radio Controlled Toy Tractors

Phurge pointed out a story about a man with a fleet of remote control toys and a lot of patience. "Excavating a basement using professional machinery is nothing new but doing it with radio controlled (RC) scaled models is something unheard of. Welcome to the little big world of Joe, from Saskatchewan, Canada. For the past 7 years, Joe has been digging out his basement at an average annual rate of 8 to 9 cubic feet using nothing more than RC tractors and trucks. And we're talking about the whole nine yards here — he starts by transporting the excavator on an RC truck to the basement, unloads it, digs and uses other trucks to transfer the dirt up to the ground through a spiral ramp! He even has a miniature rock crusher! 'I feel quite fortunate to have stumbled onto this basement excavation idea, it's been a great past time to date dreaming up new ideas to tackle different projects along the way,' Joe wrote on the Scale4x4rc forums where he also posted pictures and videos of his feat."

169 comments

  1. Follow up: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Joe says that he plans to have his house built within the next 18 months, at which point his mother will move in upstairs and he will take up residence in the basement with his computer.

    1. Re:Follow up: by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      Follow-up article (but to related to the parent joke): a interview of Joe.

    2. Re:Follow up: by LifesABeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      Were those RC construction vehicles Union RC Construction Vehicles?

    3. Re:Follow up: by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Joe says that he plans to have his house built within the next 18 months, at which point his mother will move in upstairs and he will take up residence in the basement with his computer.

      Knock him all you want, but at least his hobby/models *do* something. I know tons of guys that spend $$$$$ on RC that do nothing but drive/fly around and crash.

      In that interview someone posted he said he doesn't want to stop. Hey Joe, when you run out of dirt in your basement you can use my backyard to dig a hole for an inground pool. At 2-3 cubic yards a year it should take awhile and I'm in no hurry, I won't even charge you much for use of my backyard :)

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    4. Re:Follow up: by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

      Further:

      I hope he has the required testing/engineering done and monitoring in place to maintain slope stability on the pit face under the excavator.

      He could accelerate the bucket-and-shovel process by acquiring an RC dragline unit. This would be especially desirable if he has future work lined up in the area. eg: Neighbors' basements, latrine (outhouse) pits, etc.

  2. Basement by rherbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least now he'll be able to move out of his parents' basement.

    1. Re:Basement by AG+the+other · · Score: 1

      Well, at least now he'll be able to move out of his parents' basement.

      Don't you mean into his parent's basement?

      --
      Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
    2. Re:Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh, he said 'his house' not his parents house, so he meant his parents are moving into the upstairs part of his house, while he lives in the basement.

    3. Re:Basement by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I bought a house and moved in the basement, my mother moved in upstairs. Do I live in my mother's basement? Nah, she moved in my attic, right? RIGHT??!??

    4. Re:Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suddenly reminded of 'Allo 'Allo.

    5. Re:Basement by tahuti · · Score: 1

      if he installs blinking bed posts and mic in bedpan, he deserves to be called Nighthawk

    6. Re:Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say that, movie-wise, the connotations of having your mother living in your attic don't really seem all that attractive of a proposition either.

    7. Re:Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Allo allo, this is Nighthawk calling....

    8. Re:Basement by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean into his parent's basement?

      Maybe he removed the dirt from his basement by putting it in their basement.

    9. Re:Basement by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Just waiting to see an RC moving truck pull up to his house. Maybe it will only take 5 years to move?

    10. Re:Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents own a ranch style home, you insensitive clod!

  3. How about oing the same for snow clearing? by tomhudson · · Score: 2

    A few RC trucks with front-mounted blowers could be fun :-)

    1. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by owenferguson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I second that. Would love a scale model RC of one of these bad boys: http://www.darkroastedblend.com/2009/08/jet-engines-on-trucks-for-fun-and.html

    2. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I am totally going to have to do that. I have a freaking *HUGE* driveway on the side of a mountain, and I'm tired of paying the plow guy to come plow when he finally gets around to it (which usually means "after I've already towed my step-daughter and/or neice out of the ditch"). This probably wouldn't take any longer between snowfall and a clear driveway than the plow guy, would probably be break-even on expenses, but would be a boatload more fun :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    3. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by TempestRose · · Score: 1

      Just buy a Kubota with a snowblower.

      I did, after I hand dug out my dad's truck during the first snow after we moved in.

      It's, um, a bit more expensive. But it also works quicker

    4. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 1

      I was gunna suggest an ATV, or something similar and get a small plow for it, or roll your own... could be cheaper, especially if you buy used.

      I guess you would want a heated cabin too huh? Hmmm.... sheet metal on the sides with a door, and a windshield(front and back) out of plexi or acrylic?

      For heat.... you could try to take advantage of the heat off of the ATV engine, or if you can supply enough power to it maybe an electric heater(keep away from things that can melt!) or something.... just an idea.

    5. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by Leebert · · Score: 2

      Can't immediately find the Slashdot story, but this was mentioned a few years ago:

      http://www.i-shovel.com/

    6. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      You can buy radio controlled Piste Machines :-)

      http://shop.pistenbully.com/product_info.php?products_id=4233

    7. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by daremonai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if it takes seven years to clear the snow away ...

    8. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You should try a shovel. Works much better than using your hand. You don't have to go all-out :P

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Nah, an ATV isn't big and powerful enough for the snowfall we consistently get up here -- it takes a full-size truck when we get dumped on. Someone else mentioned a Kubota, but I priced those -- they're $20K on Craigslist but I could buy an equipped plow truck for $5K if I shop around. Besides, a fleet of GPS guided, autonomous (Arduino?) R/C front-end loaders, excavators and dump trunks would 1) be more fun; 2) be more education; and 3) trump the **** out of an ATV for geek-factor ;)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    10. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repave the driveway with heating elements - you just need to get the temperature of the driveway just slightly over the freezing point, so everything that falls melts quickly.

    11. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If an ATV is not sufficient for your snow load, how are you going to manage with RC vehicles and still get it done in a reasonable amount of time?

    12. Re:How about oing the same for snow clearing? by TempestRose · · Score: 1

      heh, the shovel worked for one side. The other side I couldn't fit any shovel into.

  4. Pretty fucking cool by WiiVault · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wish I had a basement now. /nerdgasm

    1. Re:Pretty fucking cool by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's cool, I guess. But 7 years?

    2. Re:Pretty fucking cool by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      That's the point - start now, and in 30 years you will!

    3. Re:Pretty fucking cool by EdIII · · Score: 1

      It was just an elaborate excuse to convince his wife to let him spend that much time on money on RC toys. In other words, it was a hobby.

      Sounds like a pretty fun one too. He can build a man cave down there and showcase the RC toys and be able to tell visitors he created the whole thing with those toys.

    4. Re:Pretty fucking cool by mcavic · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm all for man caves and RC. I'll say that much.

    5. Re:Pretty fucking cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was just an elaborate excuse to convince his wife to let him spend that much time on money on RC toys. In other words, it was a hobby.

      Sounds like a pretty fun one too. He can build a man cave down there and showcase the RC toys and be able to tell visitors he created the whole thing with those toys.

      Yeah, except his wife left him because of it.

    6. Re:Pretty fucking cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe those aren't really RC vehicles. He's a slave of the evil machines and his wife is buried somewhere...

    7. Re:Pretty fucking cool by tenchikaibyaku · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how many years he'll be gone from society if he discovers minecraft..

    8. Re:Pretty fucking cool by Pooua · · Score: 2

      Wife?

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    9. Re:Pretty fucking cool by ghmh · · Score: 1

      I can imagine it though - Joe was last seen heading towards the mountains through the forest. He appeared to be carrying 12 pick axes, 6 shovels and a sword of some sort many years ago. Occasional sightings have been reported of a blocky figure occasionally appearing from the ground to chop down and even punch trees and attacking the local boars? The few photo's that have tried to capture this stranger have always ended up too low in resolution to be used for identification. On a couple of occasional brave investigators did make their way in to the places the blocky figure was last seen, but never returned. Search drones flying over to find out what happened have never been able to locate them or any evidence other than some strange new small craters of unexplained origin.

      The last possible reference to Sasquatchewan Joe (as he is now known) was in the Weekly World News which claims to have a source which has seen him riding a saddled pig off a cliff.

  5. Interesting idea by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, build small equipment the size of a riding lawn mower, but then use RC (wifi or bluetooth) to control them. With being small and cheap, it would be possible to dig out multiple parts of an area.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now if he set up a server and had it control the toys 24/7 --- that would be way cool.

    2. Re:Interesting idea by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      Well, that is exactly what I was thinking. In fact, the code base could be adopted for robotics for the Moon and Mars. In my mind, it is better to send a number of smaller robotics to the moon, rather than one large one. That way if you lose one or two, you are not out of commission.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Interesting idea by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      I NASA has the code base pretty well covered, you need to deal with the ~20 min light speed time delay, which increasingly requires more autonomy from the rover to make exploration more efficient time-wise.

      But wouldnt it be nice just to tell a robot to dig a hole of blah dimensions, place dirt at blah, come back the next day and find it done.

    4. Re:Interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I thought. Increase the number of devices, and get them talking to each other. Let them do the work, film it, youtube it, collect cash from a uni.

    5. Re:Interesting idea by mpoulton · · Score: 5, Informative

      Radio controlled equipment is already used in construction. Working in trenches is dangerous and required elaborate and expensive safety precautions. To avoid this, contractors use methods that avoid putting people in trenches. This usually involves equipment with long arms to manipulate things (like a robotic pipelayer) but some equipment is remote controlled. Like this compactor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc18eKDyMlc Radio control of large pieces of equipment like concrete pumps is also common, but for the opposite reason. It allows the operator to be at the location where the action is happening rather than in a cab far away.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    6. Re:Interesting idea by drfreak · · Score: 2

      Stop making sense. You're killing the thread!

    7. Re:Interesting idea by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yup. That is what I was thinking of, EXCEPT that it is not working in an autonomous or even semi-autonomous. This would be useful for NASA or even Google to create X-Prizes for doing just that. By getting equipment to be given an assignment and then you walk away, this allows for a larger number of exploration, construction and mining on the moon, mars AND earth.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Interesting idea by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      build a thing that lays out a cnc mill for digging!

      --
      Balderdash!
    9. Re:Interesting idea by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Lightspeed lag to the Moon is only 3 seconds. You must be thinking of digging a basement on Mars.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    10. Re:Interesting idea by GeoffreyBernardo · · Score: 0

      LOL

    11. Re:Interesting idea by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the video. I saw one of these on a jobsite (a steam turbine jobsite, so the use of this strange looking thing was not obvious) and had no clue what it was.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  6. pointless. automation woulda been cool tho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    if he could have automated the control with a camera and PC handling the RC control stuff it would have been a cool project. instead he coulda used a shovel and been done in a coupla weeks.

    1. Re:pointless. automation woulda been cool tho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true. his original post is here : http://www.scale4x4rc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=25724
      no automation / computer control setup. looks like all manual RC.

    2. Re:pointless. automation woulda been cool tho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You missed the fact that he does this for *RECREATION*, he even removed a conveyor belt assembly for helping to speed it up too much. (As well as making the basement difficult to traverse). This guy is a FARMER, and if he's to be believed has limited time off-farm for recreational purposes, so this activity fills that gap for him.

      No different than the time many people invest into model trains or dozens of other activities that provide no 'measurable' productive expenditure of time, but through which they derived immense satisfaction in the process of doing.

    3. Re:pointless. automation woulda been cool tho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No different than the time many people invest into model trains or dozens of other activities that provide no 'measurable' productive expenditure of time, but through which they derived immense satisfaction in the process of doing.

      It sure is fun when you're high tho! /former Saskatchewanite //lotta time to kill out there on the prairies...

    4. Re:pointless. automation woulda been cool tho by TheLink · · Score: 2

      This guy is a FARMER, and if he's to be believed has limited time off-farm for recreational purposes, so this activity fills that gap for him.

      Hmm, I wonder how many excavator, truck and tractor drivers have mini-farms for recreational purposes, does farmville count? ;)

      --
  7. Next week... by multiben · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next week, Joe plans to hold a conference with his star wars figurines to discuss possible reasons for his inability to attract a girl friend.

    1. Re:Next week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Chicks dig basements.

      They'd have it done in less time, too.

    2. Re:Next week... by EdIII · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait... what!?

      I was not aware that chicks were all into basements. Maybe when they are 14 and literally have no other place to go and the guy is a jock, but past the time you can have a drivers license? Not so much.

      They would only have it done in less time because chicks have this amazing ability to, dependent upon their hotness, to amass armies of men to do their bidding.

      You get a half dozen hot chicks in thongs with some beer, and you could easily get two to three times that many men digging a basement for them on the weekend.

      Can you say the same for amassing any army of women to do a man's bidding? That is so rare, it is only spoken of in fairy tales, and not actually believed to be true.

    3. Re:Next week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh!

    4. Re:Next week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $$$

    5. Re:Next week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe when they are 14 and literally have no other place to go and the guy is a jock, but past the time you can have a drivers license? Not so much.

      So you're saying they like the back seat of a car?..... I gotcha now....

      They would only have it done in less time because chicks have this amazing ability to, dependent upon their hotness, to amass armies of men to do their bidding.

      Yes, how do they do that again?, oh yeah TITTIES!, gotta love 'em! Well that and all guys think with the wrong head.

      Sorry, not making fun of you, just trying to be funny

    6. Re:Next week... by Shompol · · Score: 1

      No amount of mod points can let me rate it +6, Funny :(

    7. Re:Next week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have chicks do your bidding if you feed'em enough corn!

  8. Math seems wrong by esampson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Average rate of 9 cubic feet per year X 7 years = 63 cubic feet.

    That's a cube of dirt 4' x 4' x 4'.

    Hardly sounds like 'excavating a basement'.

    I'm guessing that the 9 cubic feet number is wrong. Maybe 9 square feet (with an undisclosed height of about 8'-10') for an annual average of 72-90 cubic feet and a final excavation of a room about 8' x 8'?

    1. Re:Math seems wrong by Mr+Z · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a more detailed article that the first one links to. In the more detailed article, it says:

      Every year, I excavate about 2 to 3 cubic yards of material. I mine it from the walls during the winter, put it through the crusher, screen it, and then haul it out during a summer’s worth of Sundays.

      So what we have is a unit conversion failure in the first article. 1 yard = 3 feet, but 1 cubic yard = 27 cubic feed. 3 cubic yards is 81 cubic feet, then.

      So 7 * 81 = 567, which gives you a cube just over 8' on a side, as you suggest.

    2. Re:Math seems wrong by ACDChook · · Score: 1

      From the pictures it looks more like he's just digging into the side of an existing basement, and the 4' cube of dirt would be about right.

    3. Re:Math seems wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, so easy. Why use metric when you can use elbows and noses and feet and schlongs, they are much easier to comprehend and evaluate on the spot, right? right?

    4. Re:Math seems wrong by Mr+Z · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, like nobody ever made the same mistake converting between cm^3 and m^3. 1 cm^3 = 1mL, and 1000 cm^3 is 1 L. 1000 cm = 10 m, but 10 m^3 is 1,000,000 L. But, folks in chem class made that mistake readily. Metric doesn't magically make the "forgot to cube the ratio" problem go away when dealing with volumes.

    5. Re:Math seems wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add or remove 1 zero!
      1m=10dm=100cm=1,000mm
      0.0001m=0.001dm=0.1cm=1mm

      Add or remove 2 zeros!
      1m^2=100dm^2=10,000cm^2=1,000,000mm^2
      0.000001m^2=0.0001dm^2=0.01cm^2=1mm^2

      Add or remove 3 zeros!
      1m^3=1,000dm^3(liters)=1,000,000cm^3=1,000,000,000mm^3
      0.000000001dm^3=0.000001dm^3=0.001cm^3=1mm^3

      and 10m^3 is 10000L(10 cubes of 1m^3), a cube that is 10m*10m*10m have a volyme of 1000m^3 or 1,000,000liters

    6. Re:Math seems wrong by sjames · · Score: 1

      The mistake is the same, no matter the units.

    7. Re:Math seems wrong by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      SHUT UP!! Metric is better!!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Math seems wrong by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      You know, it's a little ironic, but the standard subdivisions of an inch (1/2, 1/4, etc.) or of fluid measure (8oz cup, 16oz pint, 32oz quart, 64oz half gallon, 128oz gallon), all of which are related by powers of 2, are a better match for binary arithmetic than powers of 10.

      Sure, that's about the only place imperial measure works out better. But, I still find it a little ironic.

      The powers of 10 in metric really don't mesh as nicely with computer arithmetic as you might like. If you start with meters, stick with meters until the end of the calculation. Converting to km then cm or whatever, will lose some precision due to the fact that ten isn't a power of 2.

    9. Re:Math seems wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we make the English unit system base ten to be easier to convert and still be arbitrarily different from metric. 1 yd is now 10 feet. 1 foot is now 10 inches.

    10. Re:Math seems wrong by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      Let's hope nobody uses the article's author for the next mars mission.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
  9. Inspiring story by hashless · · Score: 5, Informative

    This type of do-it-yourself story is what we like to see on slashdot. Inspiring, nerdy, and a bit over the top.

  10. Now he just needs to automate it by zbobet2012 · · Score: 1

    Than I would be interested.

    1. Re:Now he just needs to automate it by Amouth · · Score: 0

      and given this site - that is what i expected... but als rather than something really awesome, we find someone with wayyyyyyyy too much time on their hands.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  11. For the REAL Geek Award.... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... this man should have been a bit more geeky and lazy at the same time by putting the camera and the RC controls on the Internet, then having remote volunteers run the RC toys to dig out his basement.

    This gets me thinking I can probably get the internet to excavate and build me a large swimming pool, given about 50 RC bulldozers and a month of use of my web-server.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    1. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, but I'm going to burst your bubble with a single word: griefers.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    2. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      Gamify the problem and use the right solution with the highest score. That way, if you set a sensible sets of scoring rules, calculated server side, you will avoid the consequence arising form the grievers, and you will solve you probably NP-Hard problem of using RC robots to build a pool. But if you set the rules wrong, you get creative briefing that achieve to solve the problem described by your rules...

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    3. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Griefers are not motivated nor deterred by scoring. They are generally in it for the reaction of others.

    4. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      right but if you use the scoring (or the lack of) to kick players.. kinda like auto booting TPK'ers

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well, you would have to qualify for a CDL at his pretend MVD first, obviously...

    6. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I give it about 10 minutes before your excavation project is turned into Robot Wars.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet-controlled excavators? That would work great, provided you want a swimming pool in the shape of a phallus.

    8. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll get sued by Zynga for copying one of their games.

    9. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Maybe charge $1 for an account. If someone doesn't play nice you cancel the account.

    10. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      He probably doesn't want a penis-shaped basement.

    11. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      I would watch that... especially if they have Craig Charles as the presenter again, and Philippa Forrester doing the pit interviews.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    12. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      The problem with scoring rules to enforce behavior is that you need to make sure that your scoring rules are solid. On top of that, you would also need to make sure that your walled garden is, well, walled... In other words, if you want a pool dug, you will have to set physical parameters in the shape of the pool (i.e. stakes driven every 6 to 8 inches) or a virtual parameter like a virtual wall (i.e. similar to the one used for the Roomba).

    13. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought. You'd have the excavator pulling the dump truck onto its side, and the backhoe trying to dump dirt as far from the work site as possible within the first minute of going online.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    14. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Or a giant swastika. "There is AIDS in the basement."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      all of which are required in planning. to have a game you need a goal - that goal would need defined standards for when it was acheive.. i would think size shape location are bare bones for digging out things like a pool.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    16. Re:For the REAL Geek Award.... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you geeks miss the OBVIOUS solution;
      You start with friends on FaceBook, make them moderators. Digging in the right areas and getting the MOST dirt to the refuse pile in a given time gets the most points. People with consistently high points get the right to become moderators.

      New users are logging in as members on a Google Blog set up for the RC project.

      If I only need 50 people, then I can have a few grievers to kick -- but easily, I could stop adding new users once I had enough casual users to keep the RC digging going on 24 hours a day. I figure Japan or Korea would be great for the night crew!

      >> You've all grown so cynical. It's still a world were a person can exploit others for free labor and expect not to get a penis-shaped pool.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  12. Like the Robot Vaccum Cleaners by argee · · Score: 1

    My daughter has one of those vaccum robots. Comes out of its hiding hole, runs around the
    house avoiding obstacles, or cleaning up those that were occupied on the first pass; avoids
    stairs, doesn't suck in the dog's dick, and when its done, it parks itself back in its hiding
    hole, where it is plugged in 'till the next time.

    NOW, that technology should be put to digging up the basement. The little robots go around
    digging, dump the dert into a conveyor and when done for the shift, park themselves. The
    shift being defined as when the people of the house are awake or not home. Why bother
    taking the dirt outside? Maybe, except for the stones and rocks, just wash the dirt down
    the sink drain, after all, its a little bit at a time and the aquifers have at least 20 years to run.

    A few of these digger bots, working 7 days a week for 16 hours or more a day, will probably
    do the Canadian's job in 6 months. I am sure he didn't spend 16 hours a day digging. But
    the bots can.

    1. Re:Like the Robot Vaccum Cleaners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Neato XV11 has SLAM sensors. so in theory you could do this provided you had a power source good enough.
      the neato runs about 45 min between charges and resumes in the room where it left off.
      http://www.neatorobotics.com/
      comes with open source fw control for hacking.

    2. Re:Like the Robot Vaccum Cleaners by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Dont mix the vacuum version and the digging version. It would really mess up the carpet.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  13. OMG by DSS11Q13 · · Score: 0

    just watching the clips practically made me suicidal from boredom

    1. Re:OMG by RichardDeVries · · Score: 3, Funny

      Watch a bit longer. The boredom will pass. Oh that's terrible, I'm sorry.

      --
      Error 001
      Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
  14. two feet deeper in my basement was 60 cubic YARDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took two huge dumpsters to take the dirt away. It was done with no power equipment at all, in 2 days, by 4 guys.

    It is a great idea though, I can imagine remote controlled smaller equipment being used by real contractors in the future.

  15. two feet deeper in my basement was 60 cubic YARDS by beltsbear · · Score: 0

    It took two huge dumpsters to take the dirt away. It was done with no power equipment at all, in 2 days, by 4 guys. It is a great idea though, I can imagine remote controlled smaller equipment being used by real contractors in the future.

  16. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... welcome our new truckbotic overlords

  17. And if there's an avalanche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can call the Thunderbirds!

  18. Hyphens by Myopic · · Score: 2

    The headline of this article is a good example of why it is important to hyphenate adjective phrases.

    Sincerely,
    Your Third Grade Teacher

    1. Re:Hyphens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've reread the title four times, and I can't figure out a single way to parse the sentence in a grammatically-correct fashion other than the one way that was intended -- especially since the only place I can think of where a hyphen would apply would be in "radio-controlled."

      So how did you misread it, out of curiosity?

    2. Re:Hyphens by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it could be misread.

    3. Re:Hyphens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only had one Grade teacher, and she insisted hyphens should only be used when the sentence would be confusing without them.

    4. Re:Hyphens by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Man Digs Out Basement using Radio; Controlled Toy Tractors

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Hyphens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (S)he's a third grade teacher that uses phrases like "hyphenate adjective phrases". Doesn't take much actual thought to impress a third grader, does it?

    6. Re:Hyphens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One is a sentence, the other is a nonsensical fragment. Personally, I don't think there's any ambiguity when one is grammatical and the other isn't.

    7. Re:Hyphens by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought it was obvious. As punctuated, the word "controlled" is an orphan. Instead of inserting the missing hyphen, my brain got stuck on the eventual missing preposition after "controlled". The missing preposition would be "by". But then, why would radio be controlled by toy tractors? So I had to go back and re-read the sentence, to figure out what the error was. What is missing? Some punctuation, or a word? If the hyphen were there, my brain would have understood without having to re-read. So the reason it is important to hyphenate adjective phrases, is so that people can understand sentences on the first try.

      Sorry for the late reply.

    8. Re:Hyphens by Myopic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you are making that up, because no grammar teacher would ever say something so absolutely untrue. Some parts of English grammar are ambiguous (commas, notably), but hyphenation is not.

  19. television by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    people have too much entertainment these days to go around being productive doing things like this.

    1. Re:television by twistofsin · · Score: 1

      people have too much entertainment these days to go around being productive doing things like this.

      What exactly is productive about digging a pit in your basement with RC toys?

    2. Re:television by Amouth · · Score: 2

      well if you could automate it - then you could build them, program them, and let them do their work.. over time that you don't have to do it have a new basement extension carved out.. think of them less of RC toys at that point but rather automated excavation robots..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:television by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      God God, man! Think of all the construction workers who'll be laid off when basements can be dug by computer or remotely from China!

    4. Re:television by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      well if you could automate it - then you could build them, program them, and let them do their work.. over time that you don't have to do it have a new basement extension carved out.. think of them less of RC toys at that point but rather automated excavation robots..

      I find your slave-labor practices unjust and offensive, We of the lawn worker's union are hereby on strike!

  20. Down to earth applications, hazardous zones by perpenso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first thought was that he should have spent the first two years making this an automated robotics project, and then started digging. He may have completed sooner.

    My second thought was that this guy will be fist in line to operate remote manipulators on the moon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_manipulator

    My third thought was that we could have used this guy and some bigger RCs at Chernobyl and Fukushima.

    1. Re:Down to earth applications, hazardous zones by Shifty0x88 · · Score: 2

      HAHAh love the automated idea, put probably would cost a lot more... camera(s), sensor(s), a bigger microcontroller, and a bigger battery for all of those things for starters. Then you would need to either tether them to a wall socket for power(there goes the battery expense), or program it to "return to base" to get a charge when it's battery runs low

      He does need better hydraulics though, that backhoe was weak when it was digging through the clay

    2. Re:Down to earth applications, hazardous zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice when people think instead of spouting some pop meme garbage.

  21. He needs to upgrade. by hedgemage · · Score: 1

    The gentleman would achieve a much greater result if he got himself a scale model of the Bagger 288

  22. Out-Source hours to dig. by TheFoxMan88 · · Score: 2

    Another method would be controls that work over the internet, then out-source all the hours to dig it out. I hear they got bots that grind gold on WOW, this is another avenue of profit. Its a lot safer then making another Skynet.

  23. No!!!!! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I refuse to RTFA or summary and am content with vizualizing young Timmy's mom giving him an ultimatum. "Either you clean up my basement right now, or you move out! I mean it young man! What am I saying? You're 45 years old, for crying out loud!" "But mom, it will take me a week at least to program the tractors!"

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  24. Re:two feet deeper in my basement was 60 cubic YAR by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    It took two huge dumpsters to take the dirt away. It was done with no power equipment at all, in 2 days, by 4 guys.

    It is a great idea though, I can imagine remote controlled smaller equipment being used by real contractors in the future.

    Would it be easier to use a truck to take the dumpsters away?

    --

    Lawrence of Arabia would have trouble with such dust.

  25. Make money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could have charged good money to the neighbourhood kids to do this after school.

  26. How about hack the process? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Or at the least experiment with the process now that he has the traditional methods down... maybe he can build and test out new excavation devices/technology using his small scale operation as a model.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  27. Durable toys! by thereitis · · Score: 1

    I wish I had RC toys as functional and durable as those. I bet they aren't cheap, but what store even sells them? Nice job - that must have been a lot of fun!

  28. Could be awesome instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It would have been awesome, if it was done by automatically controlled toys and some sort of positioning system.

    Imagine to have those little robots to do the work for a month or two without any need for supervision. It would be a revolution for small scale constructions.

    ~ Your epSos.de

  29. Some People by bratwiz · · Score: 1

    Some people have way too much time on their hands.

    Dig it!

  30. Interface control by delvsional · · Score: 2

    He should set up a website with some sort of interface control for the machines and live streaming video, then charge people to play with the toys remotely.

    --
    Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
  31. Chores by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If it can take out the garbage, I'll take one!

  32. Be careful what you wish for by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Soon construction and warehouse work will be outsourced to oversees workers using internet RC. It's inevitable.

  33. Patience by GeoffreyBernardo · · Score: 1

    Ladies and Gentleman, This man is not in a hurry.

  34. That's great by DrXym · · Score: 1

    So instead of taking a hit of a few weeks while contractors dig out the space he spends the next seven years driving miniature dump trucks and excavators around to accomplish the same and with no end in sight. I'm wondering what the point is here. Maybe for his next project he can attempt something similar with spoons.

    1. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the end, he gets a basement and a ton of toys to play with. with your solution, you end up with just a basement.

    2. Re:That's great by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Yes and seven years of your life to enjoy it in.

    3. Re:That's great by Phydaux · · Score: 1

      Some people play games, some watch TV, others have model railways. This story is like that. It's not a story about a man taking 7 years to dig out a basement. That is just a nice side-effect.

  35. Huh by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    Personally I found watching the video incredibly boring, but I guess that's why I'd never do something like this.
    When I first read the summary I assumed he used sensors and some sort of AI to do this while he wasn't there, now that's something I could get behind, shit getting done while I'm gone.
    Which leads me to wonder, why don't we have robots doing this sort of thing on a large scale?
    Define the dimensions of the hole you want excavated and let them do the work in a tireless, efficient manner.
    Leave one guy on site to make sure nothing goes wrong.

    1. Re:Huh by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      shit getting done while I'm gone. [..] Leave one guy on site to make sure nothing goes wrong.

      uhm.

    2. Re:Huh by PPH · · Score: 1

      Unions.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia is already doing this. While much of Australia is beautiful, many of the parts where the mining is done really suck. So, they are automating the processes as much as possible, and remote controlling the stuff that they cannot. See http://www.miningtechnologyaustralia.com.au/automation for example.

  36. Seven Years... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    I am *so* not looking forward to retirement.

  37. I wish this story was about me by corisco · · Score: 1

    God bless you, Joe!

  38. The basement isn't the point. by Catmeat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is absolutely not about digging a basement.

    The man simply likes playing with R/C earthmovers. And this is a way for him to keep on doing it during the five-month Canadian Winter, when everything is covered in snow. I doubt if he would care if it took 20 years to finish.

    1. Re:The basement isn't the point. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yeah I bet he's disappointed now that it's done.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  39. We can do the same thing in space by Karmashock · · Score: 0

    This is what some of the probes need to do that are sent to the moon and mars.

    Dig out facilities. Assemble structures underground.

    It could be tedious and take many years to finish but the robots have time. Who cares how long it takes. If it takes them ten years for a few dozen robots to build a moon base then so be it. And then we can send astronauts there and they can move right into a fully assembled and functioning habitat.

    Ideally, we should give the machines the ability to manufacturer some of the building materials from local resources. But even if we have to send them everything it's a job best done over time by robots.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  40. Idiot units. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't want to use cubic meters? Use liters!

    Cubic feet... useless.

  41. Not getting laid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose this is one alternative to having sex.

  42. And for the rest of the planet by spectrokid · · Score: 2

    that is 2.3 cubic meter. Or 3.5 tonnes of earth per year. Wonder how many batteries he burns through..

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  43. Great now patent and clone by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    This is a great idea, just like those radio controlled choppers that build towers with blocks, this could also make excavation quite different in the future, allow all these nano tech devices/machines dig out the basement as per the requires specs, and then make some cement trucks to start pouring and even some other machines to even out and compact it, as it is cool it is also quite fast should you have hundreds of these machines instead of 1 or 2....this was the beta stage, now let's see what a fleet of 1000 can do and how long it will take them.

  44. Form Devastator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Constructacons Transform!

  45. Digbots? In MY cellar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Shlock, is that you?

  46. Fukushima Daichi job offer by advid.net · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Mr Joe,

    Our company is looking for talented remote-control specialists.

    We need dedicated operators for a long term commitment in R-C cleaning on large areas of confined space.
    You are likely to have all qualifications required to join the main R-C team at our Fukushima-Daichi facility.

    We're looking forward to hearing from you,

    Tepco Director

    (my emphasis)

  47. No solely by rc by Lando · · Score: 1

    My first though was how do the remote control toys dig into the dirt. Well looking at the video he first does the digging by hand using a pick and breaks up the larger pieces. The remote control vehicles are just used to haul the material. Hardly digging it out with nothing but remote control vehicles.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    1. Re:No solely by rc by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      He should've put a jackhammer attachment on the excavator to do the ground-breaking :-P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  48. would be a great vid if I did`nt have to allow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every stinking person on the planet access to my browser

  49. Now to make it Nerdworthy. by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    The next step is to rather than human control them, built in the logic to for self control. It would have to be coordinated between different machine types and job types, a sort of swarm communication. Then scale them up a bit, allow for remote repair of components seen to commonly ware out. Load them on a rocket, shoot to moon, and get building that moon base already! :)

    1. Re:Now to make it Nerdworthy. by Provost+Kihofakirius · · Score: 1

      Add some sensors and see them dig. Someone should donate him a logic box to make them work autonomously.

    2. Re:Now to make it Nerdworthy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flip the switch "on", keel over before flipping the switch off.

      Fifty years later, the bots reach the magma layer ...

  50. Needs help to run all those machines by wbhauck · · Score: 1

    He needs to setup each machine so it can be controlled via a webserver. People could log in and sign-on to a specific machine and operate it for a period of time, say an hour if others are in line for it, if not, they have it as long as they want. He could run it only when he's there so keep the mischief to a minimum.

    There's already kits for it ... http://www.pcworld.com/article/131237/build_your_own_internetcontrolled_robots.html

    1. Re:Needs help to run all those machines by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      meh, it would only be worth if it included some sort of accountancy simulator module, otherwise it might be too stimulating.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  51. But wait... by Onuma · · Score: 1

    ...wait until the RC earthmovers want to unionize. The project would grind to a standstill, demanding maintenance insurance benefits and better wages, causing the employer to go bankrupt in the process -- putting them out of jobs altogether.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  52. Forget automation he should have crowd sourced it! by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    Wifi controlled RC project do exist you likely won't even have to pay for geeks to do the digging for you over the net. Hell you might even be able to charge gamers for the privilege. Not to mention selling advertisement the YouTube channel alone would likely become an overnight sensation with the right marketing you could turn a tidy profit.

  53. i've been to saskatchewan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is probably the most notable thing to ever occur there.

  54. Thunderbirds! by sapped · · Score: 1

    Thunderbirds are go! I can see Thunderbird 2 being dispatched to rescue an operator trapped in a life threatening rockfall.

  55. Massage parlors Washington by Tampamassage · · Score: 1

    Hi this is a Adult site in the world of ..Massage parlors Washington.The great entertainment site.