Slashdot Mirror


Obama Pushes For Cheaper Pennies

Hugh Pickens writes "Time Magazine reports that hidden deep inside in the White House's $3.8 trillion, 2,000-page budget that was sent to Congress this week is a proposal to make pennies and nickels cheaper to produce. Why? Because it currently costs the federal government 2.4 cents to make a penny and 11.2 cents for every nickel. If passed, the budget would allow the Treasury Department to 'change the composition of coins to more cost-effective materials' resulting in changes that could save more than $100 million a year. Since 1982, our copper-looking pennies have been merely coppery. In the 1970s, the price of copper soared, so President Nixon proposed changing the penny's composition to a cheaper aluminum. Today, only 2.5% of a penny is copper (which makes up the coin's coating) while 97.5% is zinc. The mint did make steel pennies for one year — in 1943 — when copper was needed for the war effort and steel might be a cheaper alternative this time. What about the bill introduced in 2006 that the US abandon pennies altogether.? At the time, fifty-five percent of respondents considered the penny useful compared to 43 percent who agreed it should be eliminated. More telling, 76 percent of respondents said they would pick up a penny if they saw it on the ground."

15 of 825 comments (clear)

  1. You can't eliminate them by netwarerip · · Score: 5, Funny

    The vast majority if store clerks wouldn't be able to round up or down to the nearest nickel.

    1. Re:You can't eliminate them by rioki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh no we can't have 9.99$! I am so confused if I see 9.95$...

    2. Re:You can't eliminate them by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Round here we have a toll booth with coin baskets thats: 40 cents.
      That's right - you need at least a quarter, a dime AND a nickle.
      Not 50 cents. Not 25 cents. FOURTY.

      I'm sure a lot of out of towners just toss in two quarters and have a chuckle at the local chuckleheaded government's tricks.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:You can't eliminate them by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Informative

      In other countries this is solved by laws demanding that all prices advertised to individuals (as opposed to companies) or where the target customer is clearly an individual include sales tax. So prices including the sales tax are conveniently set to nice round numbers.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      other countries have nationwide sales tax regulations so that you still could use nationwide ads.

      --
      bickerdyke
    5. Re:You can't eliminate them by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guys, listen, I have an idea! You won't believe it, guys! Guys?
      So, like, what if we just make coins with a value of $0.99? This way, you can directly pay $x.99-type prices and won't need pennies at all!

    6. Re:You can't eliminate them by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Funny

      From Married ... With Children:

      Marcy: Steve, don't tell them about your insane quest to create the 99 cent coin.
      Steve: Al, I invented the 99 cent coin. Have you ever noticed how things cost $7.99? $14.99? $99.99? My coin will eliminate the messy change that only catches the attention of obnoxious beggars who hassle you on the way to your Mercedes. What do you think of it, Al?
      Al: What about tax?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    7. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sigh.

      Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution: Congress has the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, etc. FEDERAL.
      Article 1, Section 8 also contains the Commerce Clause, by which basis the FEDERAL government enacted (15 USC 45, and FTC regulations associated) laws and protections for consumers against false and misleading advertising.

      It would be trivial, and WHOLLY within the power of the Congress, to pass a law requiring that advertisements show the TRUE price of an item with associated taxes rather than the misleading pre-tax value.

      Maybe you should learn more about your country and government, rather than relying on the lies and misrepresentations that you're getting from Tea Retard pamphlets?

    8. Re:You can't eliminate them by SMoynihan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly!

      "One, two, three, for..."

    9. Re:You can't eliminate them by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I see on the shelf is exactly what I pay.

      That is kind of the point of a nationwide identical tax on things, allowing stores to write out price stickers showing exactly what you're paying without having to calculate which part is tax etc.

      Hence the comment further up about stores being forced to write out what you have to pay, not what the base price is, when targeting 'civilian' customers.

      This whole thing America has with having to manually add taxes and tips at restaurants is a real head-shaker for many Europeans. We only give a tip if we've been treated above and beyond the ordinary, since the serving staff at a given restaurant actually collects a paycheck. You should try that system sometime. :-)

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  2. what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In most Euro-countries, prices are rounded to the nearest 5-cent number, 1- and 2-cent coins are quite rare. Why even bother producing coins that are worth more as a material than as a coin?

  3. Get rid of them by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Australia got rid of 1 and 2c pieces years ago and that didn't kill us at all.

    That doesn't mean you people don't advertise things at 99 cents, just that you total up the bill and then round to the nearest 5 cents. Sometimes you win (all of 2 cents on a single bill) and sometimes you lose (again, all of 2 cents on a single bill).

    We also ditched $1 and $2 paper currency for $1 and $2 coins. That was also a good move in getting rid of those ratty dollar bills. The US cold easily do the same thing as you already have $1 coins in circulation. About the only people who will notice a change are the strippers who will now have use their coin slots.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  4. We did it in Holland by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Dutch Guilder (Gulden) had its cent removed years ago and when the Euro was introduced it wasn't long before it was agreed the Euro cent would no longer be used either. The latter is a bit more of a hassle since other countries haven't joined but in Holland it works pretty well.

    Prices are till in cents but the deal is that if you pay in cash, it is rounded off. On the whole it balances out although if you are REALLY cheap, you pay eletronically when the rounding is in the shops favor and cash when it is in your favor. Items that you tend to buy on their own are already at a 5 center round off. So a cola would cost 95 instead of 99 cents.

    It just makes sense, inflation makes prices go up but currency stays the same. So why keep amounts around that just don't make sense anymore? When the euro cent was briefly used everyone here quickly saw how fucking annoying they were, you soon ended up with a huge pile of worthless coins. You have to go pretty far back in time to remember being able to buy anything for a cent. I can barely remember being able to buy a single piece of gum for a nickle. Yes, that meant if you saved up 5 cents you had a piece of gum... but those days are gone. Move on.

    It will be intresting to read the reactions on this subject from Americans. Americans are after all paying for these expensive pennies with their taxes and if there is anything an American hates it is paying taxes. So, what excuses will those people come up with to keep cent/penny around? Nostalgia?

    In a way this shows the failure of democracy. This kind of move should be left to wise men, not people who feel nostalgic for a by gone era when you got a shiny penny from your granddad to buy candy. Maybe if democracy wasn't secret, then those 55% could be made to pay for the costs of making the pennies directly out of their own pocket. Wonder how many would still be nostalgic then?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  5. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do this with pre-1982 pennies. I have many rolls of them now, I drop all the pennies I get in change into a jar and every once in a while sort them, roll up the copper ones, and bring the zinc ones to the bank to get counted and deposited. It's not like it's a retirement fund or anything, but it takes just a few minutes every few weeks and my kids help me which is fun, so I figure why not?

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  6. Re:Not sympathetic. by ihavnoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure if you understand basic economics, but a world without inflation would be much worse. The main purpose of inflation is to encourage people to spend money, or at least, save it in a bank, rather than keep the money in your closet. Once there is no inflation, or even a small amount of deflation, it acts as a positive feedback - as the value of money increases, people tries to get hold of more cache, and that reduces the total supply of cash within the society, and it further increases the value of cash. Eventually, all spending dries up, jobs will disappear (since there is nobody who's trying to by ANYTHING), and the poor guys will suffer more seriously, since the rich guys (=people with lots of cash) will have their assets' value increase automatically without doing anything, while the poor guys have no job, no cash, and nothing to buy anyway. That is precisely what happened on the great depression.

    What we need is a MODERATE amount of inflation - not sure how much is the right amount, but high enough to avoid the deflation spiral, and low enough to avoid hyperinflation.

    Plus, what's wrong with government spending? The government is supposed to represent the people, and hence, the spending should be something for the people. If you find government spending to be evil, then you should have a better, more sensible government, and stop blaming the spending itself.