Slashdot Mirror


$6 Trillion In Fake US Treasury Bonds Seized In Switzerland

ackthpt writes "If you're going to steal, steal big, right? Italian anti-mafia prosecutors have announced the seizure of $6 trillion of allegedly fake U.S. Treasury bonds, an amount that's almost half of the U.S.'s public debt. The probe focusing upon money laundering has also include financial dealings alleged to direct money to Nigerian sources to buy plutonium. Sound like a movie plot, yet? $6 Trillion, that's a lot of lettuce."

134 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Please clue me in. by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting


    The U.S. embassy in Rome has examined the securities dated 1934, which had a nominal value of $1 billion apiece, they said in the statement.

    I'm admittedly not a financial/bonds guy, but wouldn't $1 billion securities raise some eyebrows? In the same way that trying to pay for a Slurpee with a $1000 bill would.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Please clue me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they were smart criminals, they wouldn't be caught. If anything,m they'd be committing legal acts in political office.

        That's the sad thing, these aren't dangerous criminals, they can only cheat the dishonest.

    2. Re:Please clue me in. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they were thinking they'd only have to sell one at a steep discount to be fabulously rich the rest of their lives.

    3. Re:Please clue me in. by superwiz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Generally, no. Bonds are issued in fairly large denominations. But in this case, it would raise eyebrows because of the date. $1billion dollar bond would not be issued in 1934. No financial institution would have lent money in such one large chunk against 1 financial paper. Today bonds are issued in at least 100 million issues, but as someone pointed out, today they are registered, so it doesn't matter what the original issue is.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    4. Re:Please clue me in. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      yeah, $1 billion is a ridiculously high denomination - they'd probably make denominations of a thousand or a few thousand for the high rollers.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    5. Re:Please clue me in. by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Informative

      The plan allegedly was to sell them to developing nations and dupe their governments. The mafia would create a circus theater filled with distractions to make them look like a legitimate outfit. Office space, limousines, fancy suits, lots of showmanship. They'd use foreign diplomats and politicians on their payroll to get presidents or warlords of a foreign country into a face to face meeting.

      They get a leader of some inexperienced government, possibly even a wealthy warlord, of a developing nation, and try to get them to transfer $1 billion worth of wealth in exchange for a $1 billion U.S. treasury bond. It is actually very creative. Had they not been caught they might have been able to pull this off. Though I don't see how any bank would have not raised a million red flags for this transaction and the reports are that the criminals wanted to move the money through Swiss banks.

      This isn't the first treasury bond scam nor will it be the last. Organized crime loves this scam. Every year a few individuals are arrested with fake bonds on them that are valued at billions of dollars. The Italian police found a bunch of fake $1 billion bonds during a routine car stop a few years ago.

    6. Re:Please clue me in. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      However, just 10 years earlier in 1924 the Germans, who live next door to Switzerland, experienced hyperinflation. This got so bad that they had to change currencies and literally remove 12 zeros from the old one. Maybe the counterfeiter got his 2's and 3's mixed up?

    7. Re:Please clue me in. by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here is a story with a picture of the bonds. Kind of cool to look at, even if not real. You are right though, here is a quote from the story:

      Creating fake Treasuries is a “common scam, especially in Italy,” he said. The tipoff was the “astronomical” face value of each bond, he said. Fake bonds in high denominations are more common in Europe, where people are less familiar with the face value of U.S. Treasury bonds than in the U.S., he said.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Please clue me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Looking at the bond at your given link, it looks like they added 4 zeroes to the $100,000 note (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_denominations_of_United_States_currency#.24100.2C000_bill).

      So be on the lookout for $10,000 Washington notes.

    9. Re:Please clue me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Banks are greedy motherfuckers, too. I worked for one (big one) doing due diligence. I personally delivered files on unsavory corporate raiders who gutted many companies and left behind ecological disasters that had to be then cleaned up by the EPA on taxpayer dime. But since none of them were ever convicted of anything, the bank smiled politely and opened their accounts.

    10. Re:Please clue me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And they would've gotten away with it too, if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!

    11. Re:Please clue me in. by repapetilto · · Score: 2

      What is stopping them from being held responsible?

    12. Re:Please clue me in. by pz · · Score: 1

      and try to get them to transfer $1 billion worth of wealth in exchange for a $1 billion U.S. treasury bond

      My guess is that they'd try to get them to transfer some lesser amount to make the deal more attractive, say $500 million worth of assets. What despot isn't desparate for more cash?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    13. Re:Please clue me in. by the_other_chewey · · Score: 2

      And a hyperinflation in Germany would affect the face value of US Treasury bonds exactly how?

    14. Re:Please clue me in. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1, Troll

      Maybe they were thinking of the old Italian Lira. At the time of the Euro changeover a 500,000 lire note was worth € 258.23.

    15. Re:Please clue me in. by cvtan · · Score: 1

      If you're going to make a fake bond, why not make 1 bond worth $6 trillion? It would be so much easier to carry.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    16. Re:Please clue me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, just 10 years earlier in 1924 the Germans, who live next door to Switzerland, experienced hyperinflation. This got so bad that they had to change currencies and literally remove 12 zeros from the old one. Maybe the counterfeiter got his 2's and 3's mixed up?

      The German reichsmark was issued in both metal coins and as paper. Already during WWI the real world value of these different forms of payment began to diverge. The German hyperinflation only affected ther paper money (papiermark) - bonds sold abroad were denominated in goldmark and as such stable.

      the hyperinflation ended with introduction of the rentenmark - which by a fairly complex scheme was looking as much like a gold currency as a currency can do without being backed by gold (rentenmark could be exchanged for bonds that paid the papiermark value of one goldmark at maturity) and was trading 1:1 with goldmark. As prices stabilized the rentenmark was converted 1:1 into the new reichsmark.

      The goldmark was never affected by all these shenanigans and during the peroid of hyperinflation big business transactions were often conducted in goldmark (or foreign currencies).

    17. Re:Please clue me in. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You know. I'd pay real money to have one of them framed on the wall or printed on a T shirt.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    18. Re:Please clue me in. by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The fact that corporate fraud divisions are structurally understaffed? At least that's true where I'm from.

    19. Re:Please clue me in. by azalin · · Score: 1

      And a hyperinflation in Germany would affect the face value of US Treasury bonds exactly how?

      Well it paved the ground for this guy who stole Charlie Chaplins beard and his pals. They later engaged in a little tour across europe that indeed did affect the US economy. But beyond that, probably not much.

    20. Re:Please clue me in. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's a fine line to pick the exact ratio that's believable. If you're offering 10% above market rate, then people will likely just believe that they got a good deal. If you're offering 100% above the market rate, then they'll think that there's something a bit fishy going on. You need to offer a good enough deal that they thing they're getting the better of you, but not such a good one that they become suspicious. This is where most 419 scammers fail: people are far more likely to believe that they can get $100 due to a bank error than $1,000,000.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Please clue me in. by microbox · · Score: 2

      Regulatory capture.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    22. Re:Please clue me in. by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      The plan allegedly was to sell them to developing nations and dupe their governments. The mafia would create a circus theater filled with distractions to make them look like a legitimate outfit. Office space, limousines, fancy suits, lots of showmanship. They'd use foreign diplomats and politicians on their payroll to get presidents or warlords of a foreign country into a face to face meeting.

      They get a leader of some inexperienced government, possibly even a wealthy warlord, of a developing nation, and try to get them to transfer $1 billion worth of wealth in exchange for a $1 billion U.S. treasury bond.

      Well, it was a pretty ingenious scheme, but it looks like Obama is going to have to find another way to pay off the U.S. debt...

    23. Re:Please clue me in. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      You mean moustache, not beard.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    24. Re:Please clue me in. by jep305 · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to TFA, the US Treasury has never issued a bearer bond above $10,000 value.

      --
      In Reason We Trust
  2. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The sheer scale of this counterfeiting, $6 trillion dollars worth, and the truly baffling thing is how little coverage its receiving in the mainstream media.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why would it? If you photo copy some bonds, why is that news? Here, I can print up some while type this comment... where is my 15 minutes?

      Bonds are registered. It is nice having a piece of paper, but the paper is not important. Only bearer bonds are unregistered, and the US gov't hasn't use them for years. There are some old bearer bonds that were never redeemed, but the the total amount is less than $100M.

    2. Re:Wow by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yeah. $6 ~trillion~? Lol ... how did that NOT raise eyebrows earlier than this?

    3. Re:Wow by Sir_Sri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Huh? This story seems to have hit the press the moment it was discovered, and they all sort of ignored the absurdity of it. It's the guy with a printer argument, only expensive printer and organized mafia, but it was absurd. 10 seconds of internet searches reveals US gpd in 1934 as under 100 billion dollars, so a 1 billion dollar bond is just nonsense. That they printed 6000 of them, which is maybe a few thousand dollars in forgery is hardly that significant.

      It doesn't seem like anyone important who saw them took them as actually legitimate. They found them and reported them as a result of some bad cheques (that were to the tune of 200k), and that was the end of it.

    4. Re:Wow by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Presumably the bonds would be sold to third parties....

      Then eventually banks would own them but when it would be time to collect.... oops, not valid.....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    5. Re:Wow by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      cue "Sad Trombone"!

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  3. Photos cast doubt on whether or not they are fake by Openstandards.net · · Score: 2, Interesting
  4. Nobody ever said crooks were that smart by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Crooks come up with stupid plans all the time, and often let their own greed blind their judgement. Hell look at some of the people who scam the 419 scammers. The 419 scammers are counting on people's greed to overwhelm their good sense, and then fall victim to the same thing.

    Indeed such a thing would almost certainly raise eyebrows but the crooks likely didn't think it through.

    1. Re:Nobody ever said crooks were that smart by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Funny

      None of that makes any sense, so perhaps a new MI movie instead.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  5. Duh! by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone knows the real ones are in China!

    1. Re:Duh! by metlin · · Score: 2

      ...and Japan.

    2. Re:Duh! by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Japan is in worse financial condition than the US. They probably sold off any they had to China or some other country years ago.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    3. Re:Duh! by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Informative

      No they didn't, in fact they increased their holdings significnantly (by almost 20%) in 2011 - almost taking back the top holder spot from China (China held 5% more) at the end of the year.

      But don't let facts get in the way of your fantasies about the financial condition of Japan. Of course better to pick facts that aren't quite so published.

    4. Re:Duh! by metlin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Slashdot, where people's knowledge of technology is only surpassed by their knowledge and understanding of of economics.

      But here you go: major foreign holders of treasury securities. Holdings at the end of Dec 2011:

      China: 1100.7B USD
      Japan: 1042.4B USD

      And oh, here's the data on the Japanese GDP since 1960.

      FYI, it's grown from 4.6674T USD in 2000 to to 5.4588T USD in 2011. Sure, it fell for a while from the high of 5.2644T USD in 1995, but to state that their economy is not performing well only shows your stupidity.

    5. Re:Duh! by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      What is your definition of "economy performing well"?

    6. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GDP?

      Heck as someone who lives in Osaka, I can tell you, 2011 was a great year.

    7. Re:Duh! by microbox · · Score: 2

      Japan is in worse financial condition...

      You should read about the myth of Japan's failure.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    8. Re:Duh! by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Japan's debt as compared to GDP is significantly higher than the US.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    9. Re:Duh! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Japanese hold most of their own nations debt as well as much foreign debt. They have insane savings rates, or perhaps Americans do.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And you should read this:

      http://spikejapan.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/spiked-eamonn-fingleton/

      The single biggest tip off is the use of Shadowstats. If you take Shadowstats statistics to their rational conclusion, US Treasuries have a _negative_ interest rate. Which is to say that buyers of US Treasuries are paying money to lend money to the US Government.

      http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shadow_Government_Statistics

  6. Never intented to be used directly. by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would guess the planned scam (Including the Nigerian connection) would be sending spam e-mails, etc. saying "as a nigerian prince, I inherited this billion dollar certificate. I just need a loan of $10,000 to pay for security, transport, etc. to have it redeemed, then you'll get $100,000 back..."

    The certificates themselves would never be 'redeemed' just used to bait greedy people into getting scammed.

    1. Re:Never intented to be used directly. by Openstandards.net · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure the letter to Nigerians, written from someone trying get their money back, promised trillions of dollars in bonds to be paid as soon as a small deposit of plutonium was deposited to help pay a lawyer who could sign over the bonds.

    2. Re:Never intented to be used directly. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      why would you need real fake bonds for a nigerian scam? even a pic of such "bonds" could be doctored from pics off the net.

  7. Movie Plot? by guttentag · · Score: 2

    The probe focusing upon money laundering has also include financial dealings alleged to direct money to Nigerian sources to buy plutonium. Sound like a movie plot, yet? $6 Trillion, that's a lot of lettuce."

    OK, it's the Libyans who want plutonium and used pinball machine parts, and you only need a couple heads of lettuce to generate 1.21 gigawatts of electricity with Mr. Fusion, not 6 exa-heads of lettuce. Get your Back To The Future quotes straight!

    1. Re:Movie Plot? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Discharge a AA nicad batery (~1200mAh) in 4.3 miscroseconds, and you have 1.2GW, so a few lettuce leaves poses no problem. Now, getting a GJ would take a few head of letuce.

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    2. Re:Movie Plot? by tibit · · Score: 2

      Wait a minizel, informafuckingwhat?

      That AA battery is a strawman like nobody's business. What you're claiming is that if you take about 5000J of energy and transfer it in 4.3us, you need the average power level of 1.2GW. That's very clever of you, but this is kinda middle school physics and I'm not impressed unless you're in middle school. But since you tossed in a physical object, rather than just numbers in some pupil's workbook, let's be real, mmmkay?

      The middle school pupil would, obviously enough, claim if you discharge it all in 4ns, you'd get 1TW, right? That's even better than some feeble gigawatts, I tell ya!!

      Let's forget about the self-resistance and thermal capacity of a real AA nicad, or even about whatever circuit you use to do the discharge. Let's just focus on the fact that the damn thing has rolled electrodes and will have some real-life inductance.

      Pray tell, what inductance would we need to discharge such a battery so quickly? That's easy back-of-the-envelope stuff. Rounding everything one or two significant figures, you get 4000J when you discharge for 4us, at 1V, at an average current of 1GA. If you assume a triangular current shape, then you need to have dI/dt of 2GA/2us = 1E15 A/s. Letting us have a maximum of 10% of voltage drop on self-inductance, your maximum allowed inductance is 0.1V/(1e15A/s) = 1E-16 Henries, or 1E-7 nanoHenries.

      Now let's just remember that 1 inch of "generic" PCB trace has on the order of 10nH. Your battery would need to be on the order of 0.1um in size to have that small of self-inductance, and that's assuming it was a solid piece of metal.

      0.1um is the size of the smallest of bacteria.

      Never mind that you'd be looking at mutual forces between the outermost electrode layer and the ones underlying it on the order of 1E6N per mm of length of the electrode, I took a guesstimate reduction due to the fact that there are multiple layers wound together, so this is probably quote conservative.

      Yes, I'm pissed that someone would be called informative for being 6+ orders of magnitude off base (in terms of physically possible discharge times).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:Movie Plot? by TrekkieGod · · Score: 2

      Let's forget about the self-resistance and thermal capacity of a real AA nicad, or even about whatever circuit you use to do the discharge. Let's just focus on the fact that the damn thing has rolled electrodes and will have some real-life inductance.

      Way to miss the point, dude. The GP was pointing out that Back to the Future's concept that it takes 1.21 GW to perform a time-travel trip is flawed in that it's a unit of power not energy. For how long does the flux capacitor need to draw 1.21 GW is important information. If it doesn't really need that much energy, then a few heads of lettuce would be plenty, as long as you have some system to store the energy you produce from that lettuce and then release it extremely quickly. Which, if you accept that the movie universe has the technology for portable fusion reactors that can perform useful fusion on organic material and aluminum cans, the quick discharge of energy is the least of the physics problems those engineers had to overcome.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  8. Re:Photos cast doubt on whether or not they are fa by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do the photos have a 50 star flag over the "series 1934" label? The box itself isn't even correct... unless there is some good reason it doesn't have the period correct 48 star flag.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  9. Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, that is the dumbest conspiracy theory I've seen. The fact aside all the truther bullshit of "9/11 was an inside job" there's no way the bonds were real on account of the amount. In 1940 the US debt was only about $43 billion dollars (the GDP was only $97 billion). So there weren't $6 trillion of bonds floating around. The debt didn't hit the $6 trillion mark until late 2002 (the GDP was about $10 trillion). However, dates of the bonds aside, the treasury doesn't issue physical notes anymore. They are all just electronic entries in a database. Far more convenient, secure, and trackable.

    Might want to lay off the conspiracy sites. Here's a hint: If someone starts going on about 9/11 being an inside job, they are a conspiracy nut.

    1. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      yeah, and conspiracy theorists think you're the crazy one when you don't buy into their wild ideas. It can *drive* you crazy.
      though ZeroHedge is nothing compared to some of the stuff I've read.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    2. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
      The conspiracy theory is not what is interesting. It is the photos of these boxes and their contents that have been on the Internet for years now. The question Zero Hedge raises is why would they go through the trouble of creating counterfeit boxes? You can't cash the boxes, only the bonds.

      .
      It would be interesting to have independent scientific authentication on the boxes and their contents. Then, if they happen to originate in 1934, try to discover the story around them. Otherwise, if science proves they were created recently, we can quickly dismiss them as fraud. Right now, we have no idea how they determined they are fraudulent. There is also no evidence they were being used in a transaction, only conspiracy theory purported by the Italian authorities who admitted they found them in storage.

    3. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by quantaman · · Score: 1

      There's also the part where WWI was planned by freemasonry...

      Though I do feel reassured that my BS detector was going off even before I noticed all the other conspiracy theories showing up, I guess everything is still in working order.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Openstandards.net · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's what I thought. But, the more I dig on the boxes, the more historical they appear to be. Here is an interesting thread discussing them: http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php?action=printpage;topic=2598.0

    5. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ya zerohedge has always got my antennae twitching but I've never read much of it, despite people's love for linking it here and not been enough of an expert to really judge what he's saying.

      However this here shows that as is so often the case it is just another random Internet conspiracy nut that people have latched on to.

    6. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      No 9/11 truther conspiracies there, but an interesting history predating this incident of other boxes out there exactly like this.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    7. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by X.25 · · Score: 1

      Might want to lay off the conspiracy sites. Here's a hint: If someone starts going on about 9/11 being an inside job, they are a conspiracy nut.

      What I am actually enjoying is seeing so many 'conspiracy theories' from past 20 years turning out not to be conspiracy theories at all.

      But blind mediocre nuts will just keep calling anything they don't like a "conspiracy theory".

    8. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Openstandards.net · · Score: 2
      Not sure which image you are looking at, but the photo I see has 13 stripes: http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2012/01/Chicago_Bonds_4_0.jpg

      Don't forget, these are raised stripes, not alternating colors. And the flag is in a box, so don't count the upper and lower thin lines.

      That said, the bigger issue is the stripes are staggered, which is very uncommon for the 48 state period. That alone convinces me that the box in this photo is probably counterfeit.

      I just find it interesting that there is a history of these boxes, particularly in the Philippines, dating back to at least the 1990s. In online discussions, there is a consensus that there are a lot of "fakes" out there. But, it is not clear whether or not these were copies of real originals, or just an incredibly elaborate fraud of unprecedented scale. Either way, I'd love to know the truth behind the origin of the boxes.

    9. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1

      correction: the bigger issue is the STARS are staggered

    10. Re:Wow, Zero Hedge is going full on truther there by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      But blind mediocre nuts will just keep calling anything they don't like a "conspiracy theory".

      I don't like watermelons but it's not because of the conspiracy theories they promolgate.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. DEAR KIND SIR by Shoten · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Okay, I originally typed this in all caps...because it's funnier that way...but Slashdot's code doesn't permit it.)

    I am the widow of A.Q. Khan from Pakistan. I am contacting you in good faith because I know you are a good person and will help me. I need your help in moving $6 trillion worth of plutonium out of the country. In exchange, you will receive a ten percent commission...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:DEAR KIND SIR by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I am the widow of A.Q. Khan from Pakistan. I am contacting you in good faith because I know you are a good person and will help me. I need your help in moving $6 trillion worth of plutonium out of the country. In exchange, you will receive a ten percent commission...

      Shouldn't that be "In exchange, you will receive some polonium."?

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:DEAR KIND SIR by crutchy · · Score: 1

      or pultominam

  11. How Now Brown Cow? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Don't they have serial numbers and a look-up verification system or something? How can that much fake mulah not stand out like a sore thumb sooner?

  12. Pretend they are real by tlambert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pretend they are real and pay down the US debt?

    -- Terry

    1. Re:Pretend they are real by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Pretend they are real and pay down the US debt?

      -- Terry

      Works for the US Government.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Pretend they are real by gewalker · · Score: 1

      What would you do if you won a million dollars? Apply it to my debts as far as it would go.

      Sadly, an extra 6 trillion dollars would only reduce the national debt by about 4 years.

    3. Re:Pretend they are real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Hand them to Goldman Sachs
      2. Lend 30x the face value from the Federal Reserve to GS based on them
      3. Federal Reserve keeps quiet about the money, can't warn people into the true amount of money till GS has spent it
      4. GS buys assets that earn real money with this borrowed money.
      5. GS borrows money against these new real assets and pays back money borrowed against fake asset. (i.e. a zero sum).
      6. Federal Reserve announces all the money it created with these fake assets has been paid back, so it made a good decision!

      Nah, that's movie plot dumb, nobody in their right mind would do such a thing. It would be like handing all the wealth in the world to Goldman Sachs. Not plausible.

    4. Re:Pretend they are real by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

      The US federal debt is only 15 trillion dollars. 6 trillion would make a big difference. Of course these are government bonds, so the US government would be obliged to pay them back, er.. something, there's no one to pay if the government has them, but that's beside the point.

      With 6 trillion dollars or even half of that, you could get rid of basically all foreign debt the US has. Then your debt would be borrowed entirely from yourselves (which is mostly is now, but not completely). The reason Japan hasn't imploded, despite having 200+% of GDP in debt (compared to the US ~100%), and they've been like that for a decade, is they owe that money to themselves.

      Government debt is odd. Especially because it's in a currency you control. Mild inflation, with economic growth and a close to balanced budget deficit makes even big debts like the US has go away very quickly. That won't work for japan because their population is shrinking, and aging, but it will for the US because the population is at least flat, if not growing. But 6 trillion dollars could do a lot of interesting things for the US. Including just cover the deficit for the next 8 or 9 years. (900 billion this year, and progressively less after that, theoretically).

    5. Re:Pretend they are real by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Bonds are basically IOUs from the government. So you're suggesting that we pay our debts with IOUs.

      Trust me, Washington is waaay ahead of you.

    6. Re:Pretend they are real by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      If we pretend they are real then they would be PART of the US debt. The US debt IS treasury bonds.

    7. Re:Pretend they are real by janimal · · Score: 1

      Good point. In order for US to redeem these bonds, they would have to use them to pay back some sucker holding the real bonds and convince him/her that he/she doesn't need to redeem the new bona fide 1934 $1B ones, since they're now collector's items and will be worth far more in 30 years.

    8. Re:Pretend they are real by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Agreed completely, it is odd. Now that we recognize this oddness, how could you and I benefit?

    9. Re:Pretend they are real by matunos · · Score: 1

      Pay down the US debt with US debt? That sounds as useful as putting a portable hole inside a bag of holding.

    10. Re:Pretend they are real by Troyusrex · · Score: 2

      The US federal debt is only 15 trillion dollars. 6 trillion would make a big difference.

      Yes, our government would use such a windfall wisely and never just take the money and splurge on $500 hammers, payouts to contributors and pet projects. /sarc

    11. Re:Pretend they are real by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      The government has already issued $2-5 trillion (who's counting) with less than interesting results

    12. Re:Pretend they are real by aevan · · Score: 1

      But you see...the US owes 15 trillion, and the bonds are for 6 trillion...

      ...so I give the US the 6 trillion bond, forgive them the 6 trillion, they apply it to the 15 trillion and voila~ six and six is twelve against fifteen...

      ...now the US only owes 3 trillion!

    13. Re:Pretend they are real by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Just wait a few years. There will be no need to pretend The value of the fake bonds and the real ones will be about equal.

    14. Re:Pretend they are real by urusan · · Score: 1

      Government debt is odd. Especially because it's in a currency you control. Mild inflation, with economic growth and a close to balanced budget deficit makes even big debts like the US has go away very quickly.

      While this would probably be a good recipe for solving the debt problem, it seems like the inflation part would be pretty regressive.

      One can think of (deliberate) mild inflation as a tax, with the money coming from the reduced value of the currency in everyone's pockets/bank accounts and going into whatever is causing the inflation (such as money printed by the treasury). At first glance this might seem to be similar to a flat tax, with everyone paying a percentage of their current money equal to the inflation rate. In fact, it initially looks a little progressive since wealthy people have more money laying around to depreciate in value while poorer people spend it all right away. However, peoples' reactions make all the difference.

      People who work rely on their wages and wages are sticky. Depending on the job, a person's real income might even decay exponentially (especially if they are being paid minimum wage to do a job worth less than minimum wage). This is the worst case, as the worker is paying an increasingly large "inflation tax" until their wages are finally increased by their employer. Even jobs with regular wage increases to counteract inflation will see decay between the increases, leading to a loss of income approximately equal to the inflation rate over each wage increase period. Only a person who gets a wage increase with each paycheck and spends it all immediately would be immune. This also assumes that there are no wage freezes, which have become very common lately. The only good news is that most of an ordinary middle class person's income is tied up in physical things with real value (house, car, etc.) and these things would appreciate in value along with interest (though of course they also lose value over time due to physical dedagration, but the point is that they are not affected by steady inflation).

      As for wealthier individuals, if they hoarded their money then they would be in a similar situation as the person who does not receive wage increases, paying more and more of the same dollar the longer they held onto it (though their situation would be better as they undergo constant increases in income). However, the reality is that no (permenantly) wealthy person would allow that to happen. Instead they put most of their money into physical things with lasting value and investments. Precious metals, property, rare/unique items, and many other expensive and hard to degrade things make good stores of wealth that are unaffected by inflation (though as a disadvantage are not very liquid). Stable or deflating currencies also make good stores of wealth. Productive property like factories, rental properties, and companies make things with value that usually more than pay for any physical dedagration they undergo. Owning an entire productive property is not needed, and in fact most such properties are split up into many smaller shares. The underlying physical stability of productive investments are reflected by the fact that they are valued in such a way to account for steady inflation...if there is a steady 5% inflation rate and real 6% return then the investor will get a nominal 11% return. All this leads to the very wealthy paying relatively little of the "inflation tax", though they likely pay the most in absolute terms simply because they have more money and can't keep it all tied up in these kinds of things all the time.

      It would be more equitable to minimize inflation (perhaps keeping it around 1% to encourage private investment) and instead impose a flat tax to pay for the debt. Of course, since this is more visible it would be very unpopular, so we'll likely end up using inflation as a hidden tax anyway...

    15. Re:Pretend they are real by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Deliberate mild inflation is preferable to deflation, or to pegging a currency to an item which can have wild swings in value based on what other countries do to fuck with its value.

      And yes, when I said mild inflation the usually targets of 1-3% counts. The US economic growth just in general is 2-3% if you're not doing horribly, add to that 1-3% inflation and in not too many years debt becomes less of an issue.

      Inflation is actually good for a lot of people, so long as it is mild. Anyone with a mortgage at a fixed rate (and for a fixed value) benefits from inflation. Before I was born, when inflation spiked up into the 13, 14% range a lot of people my parents age got exceptionally lucky and bought houses etc. at 6% interest fixed rate. With 13% inflation the relative value of their debt was dropping by 7% a year. Now, banking on that to happen in general is dangerous, and 14% inflation just in general can be nasty.

      Not everyones wages decrease with inflation, not even necessarily minimum wage. That's why the minimum wage is revisited regularly. Where I lived it was just recently bumped up to around 10 dollars an hour for adults (Ontario Canada), which puts it back in step with inflation for the last however many years. Anywhere I've ever worked that wasn't on minimum wage you always negotiated your salary increases to be more than inflation or at least equal to it.

      The rich aren't hurt by inflation if they own stuff. Especially property. Because they can always just increase the rent. The poor *can* be hurt by inflation, but aren't necessarily.

      Precious metals make very bad stores of wealth. That's why we don't do it any more. Pegging your currency to a metal that might be mined somewhere else, or that might suddenly have an increase or decrease in demand screws you.

      A flat tax would outright screw the poor, and should be avoided. That's what we did in canada essentially by adding a 7% sales tax to all goods and services (the so called GST). Which helped pad government coffers, and simply served to reduce the standard of living of the poor and increase their debt loads. We suddenly started to look a lot more like the US, and a lot less like a civilized country, and then the price of oil shot up and the whole economy changed.

    16. Re:Pretend they are real by crutchy · · Score: 1

      6 trillion US dollars doesn't seem like much for some reason. pre-hyperinflationary hyperinflation maybe?

    17. Re:Pretend they are real by urusan · · Score: 1

      Inflation is actually good for a lot of people, so long as it is mild. Anyone with a mortgage at a fixed rate (and for a fixed value) benefits from inflation. Before I was born, when inflation spiked up into the 13, 14% range a lot of people my parents age got exceptionally lucky and bought houses etc. at 6% interest fixed rate. With 13% inflation the relative value of their debt was dropping by 7% a year. Now, banking on that to happen in general is dangerous, and 14% inflation just in general can be nasty.

      This is a terrible example because it has nothing to do with steady moderate interest. Those people benefitted from unexpectedly high inflation. If the people selling those houses anticipated a 14% inflation rate then they would have never offered a 6% fixed rate.

      The most important thing isn't whether the inflation rate is low or high in absolute terms, but instead that the inflation rate is stable (and therefore predictable). If we were faced with a constant 14% interest rate, then we'd adapt by having monthly wage and price increases of 14% and setting nominal interest at 14% or more. That's not to say that it would be good to have such a high rate, as some of the side effects would be costly (like constantly changing the prices in stores).

      Not everyones wages decrease with inflation, not even necessarily minimum wage. That's why the minimum wage is revisited regularly. Where I lived it was just recently bumped up to around 10 dollars an hour for adults (Ontario Canada), which puts it back in step with inflation for the last however many years. Anywhere I've ever worked that wasn't on minimum wage you always negotiated your salary increases to be more than inflation or at least equal to it.

      The problem is that between the minimum wage increases there is an exponential decay in the income of minimum wage earners caused by inflation. They are especially hard hit by inflation and there's not much they can do to stop it...unlike higher wage earners who can ensure they get regular salary increases in their contract and wealthy people who can keep most of their money in investments. Plus, regular salary increases are rarely on a paycheck by paycheck basis so income decays between increases even for higher wage earners. The point is that wages are "sticky" and this sluggish response leads to more negative effects on wage earners.

      Precious metals make very bad stores of wealth. That's why we don't do it any more. Pegging your currency to a metal that might be mined somewhere else, or that might suddenly have an increase or decrease in demand screws you.

      While it's true that precious metals are not perfect stores of wealth, you can hardly say that they are "very bad" when there are many worse things to store wealth in. They're certainly better than things that quickly decay in value, like food or consumer electronics. In many ways they are better than fait currency, which can be "mined" at will by the governing body that issues them...whereas precious metal deposits have to actually be found before they can be mined. Probably the only things that are better stores of value are real estate, certain high grade collectables, and a few productive properties...all of which have low liquidity (a Yuan Dynasty vase is worth $1.2 million, but good luck finding a buyer).

      That said, precious metals are currently in a speculative bubble. It would be foolish to buy them as stores of value right now, much like how it was foolish to buy real estate in the recent past. Additionally, in the case of gold, the US government has a ton of gold that it could release onto the market if it ever felt like it.

      By the way, I'm not saying anything about the gold standard. I'm talking about individuals privately storing their wealth in non-monetary sinks. Whether a national currency has any value or not is irrelevant when value is stored this way.

      A flat tax would outright screw the poor, an

  13. Re:It's as the bad proposal similar to evil poker. by Zibodiz · · Score: 1
    I want to reply to this, but the only thing that comes to mind is "....huh?"

    It's as the bad proposal similar to evil poker.

    That, my friend, is the quote of the day.

  14. Dear American by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    I am a Nigerian widow who just inherited $6,000,000,000,000.00 from my late husband, and I need help getting it out of my country.

    etc.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Dear American by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i just inherited 6,000,000,000 bytes of porn from my late torrent software, and i need help getting myself off.

  15. it's only 6 bills Mr. Burns used have one now cuba by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    it's only 6 bills Mr. Burns used have one now it's in cuba

  16. To exchange for Plutonium from Nigeria? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    If true, this is the more interesting fact in the news. Unless one assumes, of course, that it is an exchange of fake plutonium for fake bonds. Ah, Nigeria-- a banana peel Republic economy.

  17. Re:How much would that be in... hamburgers? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    I have here a $1 billion FRN I will be happy to exchange on Monday, for a bitcoin mine today.

  18. Re:It's as the bad proposal similar to evil poker. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    My poor brain. What did I just read?

  19. Re:Photos cast doubt on whether or not they are fa by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

    I'm more interested in why it has 25 stripes.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  20. Probably to try and dupe people by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Remember that's what they are trying to do. However the boxes are fake. How can you tell? Easy: The flag. The stars are staggered, not ordered. From 1912 to 1959 the US flag had 48 stars, which were in 6 rows of 8 stars, all on a nice ordered grid. The staggered flag we see now didn't come until later. Our current 50 star flag was in 1960. There were earlier staggered flags, but not in the same 6-5 configuration.

    Then there's the fact that it has like 25 stripes. The flag has always had 13 stripes.

    This was a half-assed forgery done by someone who didn't do their homework. When the government stamps the flag on shit, they tend to get it right.

    We don't need to try and prove they are fake, there is no way they are real. There weren't bonds issued in that amount, or anywhere near it, in 1934, the boxes feature obvious errors, they are forgeries.

    1. Re:Probably to try and dupe people by durrr · · Score: 1

      Or some subgroup of the US government actually discreetly made those bonds, in a hush-hush but valid manner, traded them for a shitton of various valuables to some foreign instance. But their ridiculous face value and general invisibility means they can easily claim they are forgeries.

      But of course no government would ever do that now would they? Because being government they are per definition on moral highground and would never do something malicious or fraudulent to further the agenda of their own person or special little circle of friends. Sortof how nazi germany totally didn't end up cooking a few million jews due to some whim of their leadership.
      Oh wait...

  21. Not really an interesting story by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because the scale means it was pretty much automatically ineffective. Also the instruments they counterfeited were never real. There are no billion dollar bonds floating around from 1934, and certainly not $6 trillion worth.

    Effective counterfeiting requires that you are cloning an instrument that actually exists and people would accept, and that you pass it off in amounts that doesn't raise suspicion.

    It's amusing, but it isn't as though these were some supergenius criminal masterminds who came close to making $6 trillion. They are some idiot criminals who had a scam pretty much doomed to fail.

  22. Austin Powers by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

    Didn't Dr. Evil demand that kind of money back in 1960 and it didn't exist yet?

  23. Re:Photos cast doubt on whether or not they are fa by artor3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's even weirder than that... Here's the highest res shot of the front of the thing that I could find - link. (Caution -- source website contains industrial grade crazy. Just mousing over the link will get you on at least four watch lists.)

    Zoom in on the flag. It's grainy, but I'll be damned if there aren't eight rows, alternating between 6 and 7 stars each. That's 4 x 13 = 52 stars.

    Personally, I choose to believe that these are boxes sent back from the future year 1934 AA (after apocalypse), by future Americans who live in a 52 state US (50 + Canada + Mexico + Airstrip One - California [it finally sank]). In the future, the six trillion dollars barely buys a sandwich, but if they invest it several thousand years ago, they'll be rich! Unfortunately, the time traveler who was supposed to invest the money got distracted chasing after a bunch of loonies who were just trying to let all the animals out of the zoo, and the money ended up in the hands of the mob.

    Hey, it makes more sense than any theory from those Divine Cosmos people.

  24. Shame by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It's a shame they seized this. It would have been so much more fun to actually have these con guys con other con people with the bonds before arresting them all.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  25. Re:Photos cast doubt on whether or not they are fa by Openstandards.net · · Score: 3, Informative
    I only count 13 stripes: http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2012/01/Chicago_Bonds_4_0.jpg

    But, the staggered stars does not coincide with the common 48 state pattern of that time.

    Based on what I've read, there are either lot of counterfeits of a real thing, or this was one incredibly engineered large scale counterfeit. These boxes have been found from all over the world recently, with highest concentrations in the Philippines, with people digging them up in the 1990s. There are quite a few stories to go with them, some more plausible than others. Yet, I cannot find any solid scientific evidence placing the origin of these boxes in history, other than when they were dug up or acquired and the condition they were in.

    Given how interesting this could be even if it all the boxes are fraudulent due to its large scale and long history, I think this is worth trying to understand better.

  26. And I thought... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    ... that the MAFIAA was against counterfeiting?

  27. Bearer bonds by Compaqt · · Score: 2

    Can anyone comment on the infamous "bearer bonds" which Hollywood and movie bank robbers are so fond of?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Bearer bonds by um...+Lucas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wiki it

      Short story is that bearer bonds pay to the bearer of them. There's no tracking of ownership. If you bought the bond and I stole it from you, you can't call the issuer to have them void that bond and issue a replacement. So literally, the bearer of the bond is the one who gets paid. Contrast that with a stock certificate - you have it, but the company knows who has them as well, or at least the transfer agent does. I steal your certificate, and you report it stolen to the transfer agent, and they void the old one in their records and issue a replacement to me.

      The us government stopped issuing them in the 80s, I believe.

    2. Re:Bearer bonds by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Lucas is right, but there is another twist.

      Bearer bonds would 1. have a face value (Maybe $1000) and 2. coupons ($50 per year ).

      As the coupon and/or bond came due you could take them in the bank, clip the coupons, and hand them over to the bank. The bank would then hand you cash and send in the fraudulent bond for remediation. By the time the bank figured out that they had been had, the fraudster would be long gone.

      The Great Gatsby implies that the fortune is from from fraudulent bearer bonds. (The bonds were of a par value that bearer bonds were never issued in. A fine point if you don't know the history.)

    3. Re:Bearer bonds by superwiz · · Score: 1

      If you look at a personal check, you'll see the words "pay to the order of". A check is an order to your bank to pay to whoever the check is made out to (out of your funds). It can be made out to "bearer", ie., the person bearing (carrying) the check. As soon as the check changes hands, its owner changes and so does the person who has to be paid when the check is presented. A more common way to write such a check is to make it to "cash". In fact, legally a check made out to "bearer" or "cash" should not require a presenter's endorsement. Because whoever is bearing the check is the one to whom the bank was ordered to pay the money (most bank won't honor such an order without an endorsement though). What does that have to do with the bonds? Well, the "bearer" has the same connotation in this context. A bond is a promise to pay at a future date (an IOU). A registered bond is a promise to pay to its rightful owner. A "bearer" bond is a promise to pay to whoever physically holds the bond.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  28. I know this one by spiralx · · Score: 1

    It's that roman_mir guy isn't it? Trying to destabilise the Fed from his secret Swiss base.

  29. Re:It's as the bad proposal similar to evil poker. by rvw · · Score: 2

    $6 trillion of allegedly fake U.S. Treasury bonds in Switzerland.

    LOLOLOLOLOL, how reliable is Switzerland and their swisse banks as to don't accepting fake U.S. Treasury bonds? Didn't they check the validity of the money when accepting them? Then, why did they have them fake inside?. LOLOLOLOL.

    In Quantum Mechanics, $100'000 is an infinitesimal measurement value that is 99.9999% statistically undetectable respecting to the current relative totality of the current U.S. debt of >$13'000'000'000'000.00

    Obama bought much plutonium under his bribery, and at same time, he did forbid to the Iran's president Ahmadinejad to fabricate its own plutonium. Period.

    In the obscurity's underground of Obama, he did prepare many ICBMs with plutonium's warheads for the comming World War III in this Spring 2012 announced precipitatedly by Israel & U.S..

    During this coming spring, instead of breaking out flowers, they will sprout nuclear mushrooms. What why is that?.

    JCPM: my/our arrow is into GRID of Quantum SAT solvers.

    My poor brain. What did I just read?

    I zhink ze lulz are taking over ze zlazzzhhhdod mahn! My dear!

  30. Yah, except for this thing called inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bzzt. The Google GDP numbers are not corrected for inflation, which means the Japanese economy has been either flat or slowly declining depending on the year you compare from. This is commonly known as their lost (two) decade(s). Japan is NOT in shape and hasn't been for a long time now, it's just that in a race to the bottom they don't stand out when the numbers are massaged just right (or enough new debt is taken on to paper things over at least until the next bureaucrat has to deal with them, who more than likely will keep trying to do the same).

    GDP is a useless statistic for a number of other reasons, such as that it does not reflect quality of life indicators like the size of the middle class etc. But mainly because it has become meaningless due to runaway leveraging through derivatives and unfettered rehypothetication. In other words, if your Zynga Dollars or your financial sector grows by 500%, and your GDP grows by 1%, your real economy (such as manufacturing, agriculture, you know, STUFF) just massively deflated.

    1. Re:Yah, except for this thing called inflation by microbox · · Score: 1

      The Japanese economy is doing fine when you consider that they made a self-conscious decision to stop growing the population. While the inflation corrected GDP shows only tiny year-on-year growth, there economy is booming when you measure wealth in other ways: technological penetration, education, life expectancy, ... you know, all the important stuff.

      Japan faulted under a ridiculous property market boom and bust, and now they are going steady.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  31. Because forgers are smarter then the average /.er by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A few years ago two old forgers, father and son, were caught. They did masterful work but their real master stroke was in authenticating the items. How do you proof something is yours and is legit? Well, you shows that you, or rather, someone long death in your family, bought it legit at an auction.

    How? They used an old and real auction catalog, pointed to an item description that was similar to the item they had forged and went with a story like my father bought this item here, what do you think it is worth if we wanted to sell it? It worked wonders. The documents were 100% legit and therefor in no doubt, they just weren't related.

    If you want to sell these bonds, you have to come up with a convincing story of why you have trillions worth of bonds. You don't just dump them in a shopping bag and get payed. A scam is about the details and a period container complete with dust is a nice detail.

    Mind you, you would have to be bloody greedy to believe such a scam but there are plenty of greedy people on the planet.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  32. Who was the Pu for and why? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    First off, does Nigeria have Plutonium? Or just Uranium.
    Secondly, Mafia is not building nukes. So, who were they obtaining Pu/U for? Obviously, they want to sell this on the black market, but who is buying? The only nations that I can think of would be North Korea, Burma, and Iran.
    Of those, Iran is the likely suspect. If Iran is buying Pu on the black market, that says a lot. Basically, it means that they are trying hard to move their timeline up. The reason is that right now, they are breeding it in their reactor, but it will take some time.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Who was the Pu for and why? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      First off, does Nigeria have Plutonium? Or just Uranium.

      AFAIK, neither, but it does have yellow-cake.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Who was the Pu for and why? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      That was my thinking as well. Unless they bought Pu on the black market somewhere. Regardless, that means processing, which few nations have.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Who was the Pu for and why? by crutchy · · Score: 1

      they have plenty of pu from their uranusum mines

  33. This sounds familiar by haggus71 · · Score: 1

    Where have I heard this before? Fraud...Nigeria....Ahhh!

    "Hello, my friend. I am a Nigerian Prince with a great offer for you. I need $1,000 to regain my homeland. In return, I am willing to sell you a million dollars in US Treasury bonds..."

  34. conspiracy nut? interesting... by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

    Not to defend Zero Hedge or "truthers", but if you assume that the wikipedia definition of conspiracy theory is accurate, the official version is just that: a conspiracy theory.

    A conspiracy theory explains an event as being the result of an alleged plot by a covert group or organization

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  35. "That's a lot of lettuce" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Its cabbage, "That's a lot of cabbage"

  36. "In the obscurity's underground of Obama".... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    ...once you get past the title, there are enough quotes of the day in that post to fill a calendar.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  37. not if you can change them into electronic format by decora · · Score: 1

    for example, the pension funds and retirement funds of the entire planet were conned into buying CDOs back in 2000-2008. those were essentially 'garbage securities' but everyone was too lazy to actually give a shit until 2008, when the government simply bailed out the crooks for 2 trillion dollars.

    if you slather over a bunch of electronic securities with mathematics and "well spoken men in armani suits", you can pretty much get away with anything.

    so whats the problem with paper securities? exactly what you say. the trick is to somehow get them infiltrated into the electronic system. id wager there is some way to do that though the same obscure off-shore accounts that corporations and rich people use every day to hide their misdeeds.

  38. Carl Icahn and Tronox maybe? by decora · · Score: 1

    do tell, do tell kind sir.

  39. nazi and soviet counterfeit programs by decora · · Score: 2

    Stalin had a plan to counterfeit dollars. Why not counterfeit bonds too? There was some very strange stuff going on in the KGB + SS back in the day. And lots of insane programs that were of low quality.

    of course now days, we pay people like Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke to counterfeit dollars, but we call it 'increasing money supply'. And our economy is wrecked worse than Stalin ever dreamed of. But whatever.

  40. Back to 1934, then did they trust it? by JCPM · · Score: 1

    packed in sealed tins, some said to be protected by canisters of poisonous gas

    Why the U.S. agents had tried to poison the bankers or their inheritage's families or their redeemers/owners with unauthorized poisonous gas made by U.S.?

    Because all was part of a conspiracy theory from U.S. for killing everyones, poor and rich peoples that manage the U.S. bills or U.S. bonds.

    If they failed the TRUSTABILITY IN GOD then they should assume their own consequences.

    Forensic researchers know that the ink used for printing these seized U.S. bonds contain "carbone atoms", so that they can test the "radioisotope C-14 decayment" evidence for proving the authenticity of these seized U.S. bonds that were dated from 1934. Now the question is the conflict of interests between trustability and fakeness, and if it resulted fake, when was it fake? In year 200x or in year 1934?. It's in the game of the God trustability that claimed the U.S. government during almost than one century.

    In 1934, the Plutonium, or the Uranium, or whatever rare Earth elements were unknown for almost peoples, so that for rare minerals, they were paid in very expensive prices for owning these "rare minerals" that didn't exist in another place of the Earth in 1934!!!.

    Oloro of Oro, the King of Yoruba, the Supreme King of the 9 tribal communities, what did happen there in 1934? The local goverment did raise the taxes them, and then bloody riots did ocurr inmediately, justly when Llorin was arrived, i believe it, i'm not sure. I don't know exactly the history, but "historians" and "witnesses" should investigate deeply their versions of the happened things 78 years ago.

    JCPM: i'm analyzing the meaning of "In God, we trust" & "E PLURIBUS UNUM" written in their U.S. currencies/bills, and the impact implications that can have them on the world since 1934 that the dispute could originate from now in 2012, when the bankers or the redeemers are deceptionated after of >78 years of "banking deposits" for NOTHING after of their commercial exchanges 78 years ago!!!.

    1. Re:Back to 1934, then did they trust it? by crutchy · · Score: 1

      plurbum snotus blowis my nosis.

      on the secret US missile bases on the far side of the moon, they have embedded computers inside the manhole cover that was shot into space mid last century to monitor the aliens on alpha centauri. but the germans sent the jews to pakistan to revive the supreme commander of the ewoks and dig out the ancient solaco spaceship that contained the dreaded mr hanky.

      Amen brother! this is his shoe... which is way more apologetic than the sacred gord.

      but in any case, as long as i.n.t.e.l.i.g.e.n.c.e stays of the shitty wall, the mongorians will be able to restore peace and order to the galaxy, and lieutenant coffee might ease off the button a little.

      on the other hand, microsoft bankruptsy is impractical due to limitations of the T-virus and 30+ suntan lotion, so the only motorvehicle suitable for faster than light travel would be a volkswagon beetle because the nazi party was the major sponsor of mr spocks jaba juice.

      timmah!!!!

  41. CIA and Obama have wiped out all US debt. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    This is a very clever scheme by Obama and CIA. Now Obama can claim ALL outstanding US Govt bond were fakes, forgeries and scams, and he has already paid off all the legitimate US Bonds. That news will hit the market on Oct 22, 2012. After the steadily improving economic picture, falling unemployment rates, killing Osama, the news that USA is debt free would be the final nail in the coffin. Obama will sweep all 50 states, and Democrats will win all the houses and senate of all the states, governorships too. In US Senate Reid will get filibuster proof, but not veto overriding number of senators.

    I tell you, the Chosen One is deep and he is the only one who can pull this off.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:CIA and Obama have wiped out all US debt. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the debt-notes of the banking cartel that we falsely call money are of course all a scam and used by a very small group of elite to drain our wealth. we should be rounding up and arresting the banking cartel thugs for treason and acts of war.

  42. NOT AGAIN !!!???!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  43. 5 years too late... by jayveekay · · Score: 1

    5 years ago they could have labeled these billion dollar financial instruments "Collateralized Debt Obligation" (aka CDO, a bundle of worthless subprime mortages) and sold the crap successfully. Same piece of paper crap whether its a fake TBill or CDO, but the latter is completely legal.

  44. Re:Photos cast doubt on whether or not they are fa by fatphil · · Score: 1

    To my eyes it looks like the bottom row with 6 stars, and the row above that with 7 stars. That doesn't match any US flag of *any* vintage, let alone a 50-state one (having 6 with 5 above). It be used for a 52-state flag, I think. Not that it matters, fake is fake is fake.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  45. More accurately by vuo · · Score: 1

    And more accurately, the U.S. budget deficit was $3.59 billion in 1934. Just four $1 billion bonds could cover it completely. $6 trillion in total means that there were 6000 of these fake bonds.

  46. Italians by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Italians seem to have unique solutions to their economic woes. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14774526

  47. Re:Timecube by crutchy · · Score: 1

    but could he be the new apk?

  48. Re:It's as the bad proposal similar to evil poker. by crutchy · · Score: 1

    dirka dirka dirka... ah dirka dirka jihad.

    he has balls... i like his balls

    just don't get on his shitty wall

  49. How does this happen by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Would no one have noticed 6 trillion extra dollars floating around,
    I thought all the money was accounted for....so even if they were to fake them
    could they really use them, or they cloned other bonds, and were going to cash them in,
    sort of like using a cloned CC, where once the money is gone, its gone...?

    Can anyone help explain please?