Slashdot Mirror


The webOS Features Other OSes Should Steal

New submitter egparedes points out a post dissecting webOS and highlighting the things it did right, in the hopes that developers for other mobile operating systems will use them as inspiration. Quoting: "webOS isn't quite dead yet. It's just being open-sourced, which, when it happens to commercial software, often turns out to be the digital equivalent of being reanimated as a walking corpse in a George Romero movie. ... Of course, it's not assured that this is the end of webOS. Maybe open-sourcing it will be the best thing that ever happened to webOS. But maybe it just means that HP doesn't care anymore, and that webOS won't receive much attention anymore. This would be unfortunate, because webOS is one of the few current mobile operating systems that are actually a joy to use. It's been hurt by HP's incompetent management, rather than any egregious faults of its own. The least we can do now is to keep its best ideas alive, even if webOS itself won't make it."

142 comments

  1. Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't fucking steal an idea. Stop purporting this nonsensical line that the intangible can be stolen. Fuck.

    1. Re:Steal. by ryanov · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because that was the most important point in this article.

    2. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can't fucking steal an idea. Stop purporting this nonsensical line that the intangible can be stolen. Fuck.

      Steve Jobs made a career of it.

      (BTW, my CAPTCHA is leopard. What a coincidence)

    3. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the point was that open source used to be cancer, and now it's zombies.

      On further thought, it's probably more like Frankenstein. Taking pieces from dead projects and stitching them together before attempting to reanimate.

    4. Re:Steal. by GmExtremacy · · Score: 0

      I don't know about that, man. How do you know the government hasn't secretly developed technology to rip ideas out of someone's head and give it to themselves?

      That said, the use of that word isn't quite as confusing when you're not using it to reference some sort of crime (like copyright infringement is in certain places).

    5. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Steve Jobs made a career of it.

      And Samsung read his book!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You can't fucking steal an idea. Stop purporting this nonsensical line that the intangible can be stolen. Fuck.

      Ideas can be stolen as evolution is a religion.

      If you can't attack something you just attach something unrelated to it to make it easier to hit.

    7. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "You can't fucking steal an idea. Stop purporting this nonsensical line that the intangible can be stolen. Fuck." - MobileTatsu-NJG

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Steal. by dan828 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sadly, the "they did it too!" defense was struck down by moms everywhere when their children reached the age of 3.

    9. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't fucking steal an idea. Stop purporting this nonsensical line that the intangible can be stolen. Fuck.

      Hey, I was going to post that! You stole my mind-fruit! Give it back! GIVE IT BACK!

    10. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually the point is that if what they did really is truly bad, then everybody else has to be held to the same standard. Failure to do that is a symptom of being a Haterade addict.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:Steal. by mjwx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Steve Jobs made a career of it.

      And Samsung read his book!

      Except that they didn't.

      Most of Samsung's ideas were built upon the ideas of Google (which is the point of Android).

      The notion that Samsung copied Apple only exists in the minds of fanboys who've never touched a Samsung Galaxy phone or tablet.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0, Troll

      The notion that Samsung copied Apple only exists in the minds of fanboys who've never touched a Samsung Galaxy phone or tablet.

      Actually I own a Galaxy Tab 10.1, and yes they copy-catted the iPad to a stupidly obvious level.

      Amusingly the people who try to argue with me on that are people who haven't held one and then the other. I wouldn't mind but Samsung's own lawyer couldn't distinguish between the two in front of a judge.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:Steal. by mjwx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Really?

      Seen that photoshop before. The saddest thing about it is that it's a fake

      Heres the real photo of the two. You may notice the Galaxy II is larger, has the big words "samsung" written on it and a widget displaying the time and date. If you didn't notice them, you need your eyes examined.

      Here is Samsung's official marketing on the S2 Here's the comparison chart between the two

      Try linking to something other then CultOfMac. So nice troll, but it's nothing but a troll.

      Sorry if reality doesn't fit in with your warped world view, but that's reality for you.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:Steal. by mjwx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I own a Galaxy Tab 10.1, and yes they copy-catted the iPad to a stupidly obvious level.

      You've never touched a Tab 10.1, that much is obvious by your complete lack of corroborating evidence.

      How do I know, I actually own a Galaxy Tab 10.1, the application draw acts differently, it needs to be opened manually rather then being open all the time. IOS doesn't have widgets that can be moved on the home screen. Ipads dont have rotation lock like the Galaxy Tab. The Tab can actually multi-task. You can move directly back to an application you were previously using, that's what the little up arrow in the bottom bar is there for. If you've actually used one, you might have known that.

      Well, it seems like there's a lot of copying going on there. The difference is certainly astounding.

      Amusingly the people who try to argue with me on that are people who haven't held one and then the other.

      It certainly is amusing isn't it.

      Especially when I can call your extremely transparent lies out so easily.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Informative

      You've never touched a Tab 10.1, that much is obvious by your complete lack of corroborating evidence.

      Wrong. I'm looking at it right now, actually. Here's a fun little bit of trivia about the Tab: MAME will run on it, and it'll properly support the iCade! It'll ALMOST fit in it, although you've got to leave the flap on the top open since it's a little too big.

      How do I know, I actually own a Galaxy Tab 10.1, the application draw acts differently...

      Actually I was referring to the physical casing of it, i.e. the very thing the 'rounded-rectangle patent' case is all about. Coincidentally that's the bit Samsung's Lawyers couldn't discern, either, which I brought up in my last post. I find it unlikely that you're unaware of this case as it's been plastered around here for ages.

      It certainly is amusing isn't it.

      You made it even more so...

      Ipads dont have rotation lock like the Galaxy Tab....

      ... see? Yes, they do, and the vanilla apps on the iPad support it better than the same apps on the Tab. I wouldn't mind much, but if you hold the Tab vertically it's a little too easy to hit the stupid sleep button by accident. Oh.. gee, I guess I wasn't lying about touching a Galaxy Tab. Now if we could just get you to touch and iPad... actually maybe you have and you just thought it was a Tab.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    16. Re:Steal. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      You can't fucking steal an idea.

      No, you can't steal an idea, because after I stole that idea from you, you no longer had the ability to steal ideas. I, on the other hand, protect my idea to steal ideas, so no one will never steal it from me.

      I'll sell it back to you for $595, though. (But can you be sure you're really getting my idea, and not an unauthorized copy?)

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    17. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Ipads dont have rotation lock like the Galaxy Tab.

      So funny when you're being a condescending ass and then can't even get your facts straight. Dumbass.

      >> The Tab can actually multi-task

      Hurrrr.. Again you have no idea what you're talking about. You can argue semantics, but the iPad can and does multitask.

      >> You can move directly back to an application you were previously using

      Keep digging that hole. Multitasking gestures on the iPad does exactly that.

    18. Re:Steal. by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The phone icons are quite similar. I'll grant you that.

      The notebooks are quite similar, but inconclusive.

      The photos apps both use yellow-leafed flowers. I'm undecided on that. I'd call it coincidence unless there's significant other evidence.

      Post-its vs. paper pads aren't that similar.

      The gears are clearly different. Gears are a standard icon and these look nothing alike.

      The messaging apps are also completely different. I cannot imagine two recognizable "voice box" symbols that look less alike. Are you arguing that a voice box is not an obvious sigil for text messaging?

      All in all, I don't see that comparison as being substantially different from this comparison: http://www.designbyinfinity.com/internet/680649f7.png. In both cases, there might be a few superficial resemblances, but they really aren't that similar.

    19. Re:Steal. by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Heres the real photo of the two

      OMG OMG OMG!!!!
      Both phones have a call button? On their front screen?!?!?!?

      --
      -- no sig today
    20. Re:Steal. by slack_justyb · · Score: 2
      Okay I'll bite.

      the very thing the 'rounded-rectangle patent' case is all about.

      First off it's a design patent big difference from patent in the standard sense. Secondly, there so much prior art to rounded rectangle this patent has no choice but to be nuked. I have in my hands right now a cell phone circa 2003 that is rounded rectangular with just a screen and a slide out keyboard. Oh look, I also have here in my collection an LG Chocolate circa 2006. It's quite rounded rectangular. Oh look here is a credit card, it too is round rectangular. Oh look the formula for the area of a rounded rectangle is A = a * b + 2 * r *(a + b) + pi * r^2; I know this because here in this math book copyright 1976 is a rounded rectangle.

      Apple wouldn't be the first to have a patent tossed out of court, because the notion of patenting a shape is ridiculous. Can we please move past the rounded rectangle? Apple wasn't the first to use the shape. Hell they weren't even the first to use the shape for a phone Hell phones weren't even the first ones to use it in electronic devices.

      actually maybe you have and you just thought it was a Tab.

      All you fancy whipper snappers and your phablets. You know how much I love plopping down $500 - $600 on a device and can't even compile a C program in a reasonable amount of time, on it. No you both have it wrong. Both iPhone and Samsung Galaxy Tab suck. I can buy a $500 laptop that smokes anything your phablets can do, hell smokes anything they can do and brews tea for me while playing a soothing classical waltz, tells me the weather in three different locations while typing a document, and compiling a kernel whist I sip said tea. Hell, can you even do SVG artwork on one of these damn things? Oh look I can for only $8.99 Oh look, I can do it on my $500 laptop for free.

      Stupid phablets, stupid fanbois, mumble mumble, get off my damn lawn!

    21. Re:Steal. by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      RTFA, no OS does multitasking better than webOS.
      Actually with the way apple dealt with it I am inclined to call it NULLtitaskink

      --
      -- no sig today
    22. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Secondly, there so much prior art to rounded rectangle this patent has no choice but to be nuked. I have in my hands right now a cell phone circa 2003 that is rounded rectangular with just a screen and a slide out keyboard.

      Oh goodie, one more person educated solely on sensationalist headlines.

      Thanks Slashdot, good to know you're getting your money's worth from your ad revenue.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    23. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show us the Google tablet that looks like an iPad and predates it. My fanboy memory blocked it out.

    24. Re:Steal. by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Oh goodie, one more person educated solely on sensationalist headlines.

      So wait a second aren't you the guy that just said:

      Actually I was referring to the physical casing of it, i.e. the very thing the 'rounded-rectangle patent' case is all about.

      Care to do any backpedaling? <flamebait>Or are you just like most other Apple users, too stupid to have anything that actually works.</flamebait> I'll tell you what, I would love Apple to win or whatever and for 98% of the world to be stuck on an iPad or whatever they've come up with by then. I'm tired of retarded end-users who think they know a thing or two but in the end have about as much knowledge as this trashcan at the side of my desk. The more of them that move into the walled-in world of Apple, the less I have to deal with them.

      By the way if you want to make assumptions on my education that's fine, Slashdot has been going down the tubes for quite some time now, however your assumption that Apple's iPad design is unique is laughable at the very least and definitely puts your knowledge of technology into question. For to say,

      Actually I own a Galaxy Tab 10.1, and yes they copy-catted the iPad to a stupidly obvious level.

      implies a belief in iPad being the original and the Galaxy Tab being the copy-cat, when neither made it to the mark first by a long shot.

      However, it does not matter to me one bit. I wish for all the world to waste their money on these idiotic devices, I think what the world needs is fewer people with real computers in their hands, it seems to not have worked out well thus far to give every single man, woman, and child something that is actually useable as an intelligent device. Hell, I can tell you for sure that basically every CEO, CFO, and HR rep on this planet have absolutely no "good" reason to own any computing device, the fact they they carry around anywhere in the area of five to seven on their person, simply states that we are all doing ourselves a disservice on scales that are impossible to comprehend.

      Of course that last part was most likely a waste of time on someone named MobileTatsu-NJG. Oh well, just chalk it up to more intellectual entropy.

    25. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Without looking it up, tell me how many points Apple raised against Samsung in that case.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    26. Re:Steal. by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Without looking it up, tell me how many points Apple raised against Samsung in that case.

      See there is your problem. What does it matter? You wouldn't be able to tell the difference between if I did look it up or not. You believe that there is some sort of real interaction to be had in computers. Please do us few that are left on this planet a favor and bury yourself in your gadgets and toys. Because, ultimately that is what they are to you, toys.

    27. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Heh. What does it matter. Well, if you had read anything about it, you'd know why it matters and you would have saved yourself all that typing. I guess fanboi is french for 'read the article'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    28. Re:Steal. by slack_justyb · · Score: 0

      you'd know why it matters and you would have saved yourself all that typing.

      Woosh! Point was totally missed and I am totally not surprised by that outcome. It must be a chore to talk to you in person, what with the inability to discern an idea when it is blatantly presented to you. Are you sure you speak English or are you processing this all through an online translator? At least then you may have had a reason for totally missing what I was saying. No I take that back, there isn't a reason. You simply confound all that is logic and bring new depths to what being oblivious to patently obvious cues to, hopefully and uselessly, stoke whatever intellect that you may have had, which granted at this point seems to be on a scale the rivals the lightest particles in the universe.

      I think I shall return to the comfort of my coffee here and simply regard this as yet another attempt to foray into the ever decaying world of intelligent thought. Thank you for providing me with evidence that we still haven't slowed down on the production of ignorance.

    29. Re:Steal. by thereitis · · Score: 2
      The AC didn't read the article very carefully, since the footnote in this paragraph explains how they are using the word "steal": "Now that it is becoming increasingly obvious that HP won’t do anything useful with webOS, it’s time to start stealing1 the things it does well. Here are some of these things." The [1] reference says

      Im using the word the way Brian Ford defined it: take the idea, but make it your own. Dont just copy it; be inspired by it, and improve upon it.

    30. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck trying to use that defense in court, or any place that isn't politics.

    31. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so, for various definitions of "home screen" the icons are not the same? Because the first picture you provided is obviously somebody's customized "home screen" due to the presence of DoubleTwist and folders. The phone and contacts button line up with the "fake."

      The cult of mac link was about the icons being similar, which they are. I guess you just assumed it was about the phones looking confusingly similar.

    32. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That is a very long way to go to save face. I'm impressed. So.... have you read up on that case, yet?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    33. Re:Steal. by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      GP must be some sort of sneaky troll account used by slashdot to make people RTFA. There was certainly nothing in the summary that mentioned stealing ideas, but I bet that made a lot of people go and have a look so they could join in with the group outrage of confusing the appropriation of intellectual property with vile physical theft.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind but Samsung's own lawyer couldn't distinguish between the two in front of a judge.

      I believe a test like this should be conducted by a person of at least average intelligence.

      CAPTCHA: 'travesty'

    35. Re:Steal. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Do you actually collect old mobile phones, or can you just not be bothered to throw your old ones away?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    36. Re:Steal. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I just got done saying it's not a defense. Failure of reading comprehension is also a sign of being a Haterade Addict.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    37. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably shouldn't yak about production of ignorance when you have such a ... detailed opinion on a topic you yourself said you don't know anything about.

      Captcha: Degrade.

    38. Re:Steal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captchas here as late seem to be psychic

      "notary"

    39. Re:Steal. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      There was certainly nothing in the summary that mentioned stealing ideas

      It's in the title of the submission.

    40. Re:Steal. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I realize I'm late to the party in responding, but what's been photoshopped in the link I posted? The link I posted has 7 sets of icons to compare. The links you provided either are a specs sheet (which I'm not sure why that's relevant), someone's modified custom iPhone and S2 home screens (again, why relevant--though a few of the relevant icons are pictured), and a generic Samsung marketing image which does indeed show three of the icons in question.

      So, what's the fake? Are you claiming some of those icons are not present on the stock iPhone or the stock S2?

      Try linking to something other then CultOfMac. So nice troll, but it's nothing but a troll.

      How is it a troll?

      Sorry if reality doesn't fit in with your warped world view, but that's reality for you.

      Wow, just like...wow. It's a phone, nothing to get so worked up about. I had a one word post that was posed as a question and a link, and you really feel it necessary to post such a vitriolic reply? Please explain, from my posting one link and the word "Really?" what kind of "warped world view" I have. Your post is honestly one of the craziest over reactions I have ever seen on slashdot.

  2. Long Live the Zombie Slave! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All OSes must perish by its deadly touch and decayed teeth!

  3. Best idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The $99 pricetag.

    1. Re:Best idea? by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Archos sells Android tablets for $140*. You can get Chinese ones as cheap as $85, but Archos is the cheapest I know of that's actually GPL compliant.
      (If anyone knows of a cheaper, GPL-compliant one, I'm all ears.)

      * Yes, the hardware is nowhere near that of the TouchPad. But we're looking at sustainable pricing here, not clearances.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  4. Must be honest by jaymzter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've used iOS for years, and have dabbled with Android. webOS beats them both hands down (for me!). iOS isn't so bad to run, but only if I want to run the way Apple decided was best, so it's a pain to get it the way *I* want it, in typical Linux user fashion. Android is just a confusing mess of non-intuitive menus and settings.

    webOS just _gets out of the way_! It's a doggone shame it doesn't seem to be going anywhere, because there's no way I'd trade my Touchpad for an iOS or Android tablet.

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    1. Re:Must be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as usability, I've had no issues with ICS on the Touchpad. If anything, Apps are more usable, despite being less similar to one another. Touchpad apps are noticeably slower, and use that funky draggable panel thing that makes no sense whatsoever. I also appreciate the launcher, which seems a lot easier to use than webOS' app drawer.

    2. Re:Must be honest by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      What I love about Android and OSS in general is that we are free to change it as we see fit. If somebody comes up with a fresh new idea of how to make something as complex as a smartphone OS easy and intuitive to use, then there is nothing stopping them making it. Just keep well away from other companies patents.

      Modify iOS? Hell no, Apple Legal would utterly destroy you.

    3. Re:Must be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modify iOS? Hell no, Apple Legal would utterly destroy you.

      Except, of course, that modifications happen all the time in the jailbreak/Cydia community:

      http://www.jailbreaknation.com/top-ios-5-winterboard-themes-inpulse-legacy-absolution
      http://www.iphoneheat.com/category/iphone-themes/
      http://gizmodo.com/5817192/the-must-have-jailbreak-apps

      But I'm sure you're right and Apple's lawyers are going to get right on top of this.

    4. Re:Must be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh, themes? Yay? You Android lets you do a whole hell of a lot more than just changing a few resource files around, right?

    5. Re:Must be honest by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Cute. How's this for a modification?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    6. Re:Must be honest by uradu · · Score: 1

      You're implying that you're a Linux user but find Android "a confusing mess"? LOL!!! Never mind that in a way you can think of Android as a window manager on top of Linux, but its GUI and settings system are more consistent than most WMs I've seen on Linux. For someone who supposedly likes Linux-like flexibility to prefer anything but Android out of those three is sheer nonsense.

    7. Re:Must be honest by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I've heard about it before.

      May be interesting to play with.

      But how can I play with it? It's a mobile OS, so can't install it on a normal PC (or at least: it won't be able to shine - no touch screen for starters). Can it be installed on an Android-based phone, maybe? I'm at the moment considering to replace my phone (the "back" button is broken - will have to root it to reassign the "search" button as "back" button at least). But maybe can try to install WebOS on it.

    8. Re:Must be honest by justforgetme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Running android on the touchpad is not the point. the point is running webOS on other HW.

      --
      -- no sig today
    9. Re:Must be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear. The word "intuitive" raises its ugly head again. What exactly does this word mean? I hear people use it when they can't work out how to use a piece of software within 0.1 nanoseconds. I think it is a synonym for "I can't be bothered to learn".

      Settings on Android aren't that confusing - they're in the Settings area. Shock horror!

      Also, menus appear when you press the menu button. Outrageous!

      However, I do grant that many Android apps have shoddy UI designs for some reason. This is the same as the army of users who wrote apps in VB on Windows who didn't know how to align controls, set a minimum size for windows or any of these other things. Some people just appear to be blind to these sorts of things, hence the app looks RUBBISH.

      Even worse, on Android 3, half the apps haven't bothered adding a new UI XML file to actually work for the Android 3 platform, nor do they bother using the new Fragments UI so the apps scale BADLY.

      But as for your argument that Android is a confusing mess, I disagree.

    10. Re:Must be honest by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      As far as usability, I've had no issues with ICS on the Touchpad. If anything, Apps are more usable, despite being less similar to one another. Touchpad apps are noticeably slower, and use that funky draggable panel thing that makes no sense whatsoever. I also appreciate the launcher, which seems a lot easier to use than webOS' app drawer.

      Well, that's more ICS than anything - ICS fixes a LOT of Android flaws. As an iOS user, I like ICS. All other Android versions are garbage, but ICS is very usable. ICS is so nice that yes, switching is an option now.

      Of course, the fact that there's only one phone running ICS out there, and everyone else is now selling outdated 2.3 or even 2.2 phones makes the whole Android device ecosystem a bit of a mess. Yes, I know people are promising updates, but with Android, if it doesn't run it now, there's a good chance it may never without rooting and installing a community ROM. Well that and the crap that is Sense, TouchWiz and Motoblur.

      Only real issue about the only good Android phone out there is it's only 16GB (the 32GB is the LTE/CDMA version, which isn't available outside the US, not that I want that). and no card slot. The 32GB GSM/UMTS one is cancelled.

  5. All HPs fault? Really? by rgbrenner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been hurt by HP's incompetent management, rather than any egregious faults of its own.

    Palm had it for a whole year and a half before HP.. they released Palm Pre and Palm Pixi using it -- both phones DOA. The Palm Pre had 0.2% market share after nearly a year on the market (source).

    HP didn't do it any favors.. but it's hard to say everyone would have loved WebOS if it wasn't for HP. No one wanted it from the very beginning.

    1. Re:All HPs fault? Really? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say DOA ...

      But WTF was up with the girl in that commercial?

      They could've just shown multi tasking ... (while you were making a call, even!), and they'd have been ahead of the iPhone at the time.

      Instead, we got a horrible ad campaign, a pretty lack-luster push from Sprint (which might've been from Palm giving the 'Pre+' to Verizon, I think it was, with 2x the RAM).

      I was *really* hoping for the Pre 3, as I've been on an original Pre for 2+ years, and I almost bought a UK phone and was considering switching providers (mind you, I've been a Sprint user for ~14 years ... back in the 'Sprint PCS' days) ... but then the Google Maps incident happened, and I'm not so sure if I want to stick with an HP phone.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    2. Re:All HPs fault? Really? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      The Pre had a huge (well, fairly huge) press thing when it came out, and most everyone in the media who had reviewed that I had read/heard said it was a pretty great OS. I still remember the tv ads with that beautiful ginger model caressing the phone. So I d/l'd the sdk and took a quick look, and I liked what I saw. But pretty shortly after HP bought Palm and then went into schizo mode. I think the only real problem was a lot of people complained the Pre seemed slow. Run WebOS on a faster proc and I think you'd have something there. The API and internals really did make a lot of sense, from what I saw of them.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:All HPs fault? Really? by xeno314 · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the speed, the one I tried out seemed fine. However, the hardware didn't feel durable (and there were lots of reports of issues with the slider), they went with a Sprint exclusive deal that gave them a small initial market, and they had those commercials with the creepy woman speaking in a creepy zen/detached voice. Add that up and they did a pretty nice job of shooting themselves in the foot.

    4. Re:All HPs fault? Really? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      The smart phone and tablet device market has grown from very small to massive in the past five years, and it's only going to keep growing. Android and especially iOS are the established players. But Microsoft is spending money like water to get Windows Phone a serious piece of the market - and it makes sense, because even if it takes ten years of investment before Windows Phone starts to pay off, the payoff can be colossal.

      Now obviously HP doesn't have the financial assets of Google, Microsoft, and especially Apple. So maybe they flat out couldn't afford the necessary investment to make WebOS a major player in the market. But I suspect this is the biggest opportunity for long term profit that HP leadership has screwed up in the history of the company.

    5. Re:All HPs fault? Really? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Creepy huh? Well, we all have our own ideas regarding beauty. But that sprint deal, yeah, that was not a good one for hp.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:All HPs fault? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got an AT&T Pre3 off ebay that an HP employee was selling. It's a good phone. I switched from Sprint to AT&T in order to run it (or my Veer, Pre2 depending on what I want to lug around).

  6. Not entirely true. by brennanw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a waiting list for the original phones when they first came out and they sold out quickly. And WebOS was fantastic. But...

      - the phones themselves had battery problems (if you slid the phone closed too quickly the phone would job the battery out and the phone would cut off)
      - as cool as the phone was, it was too damn small. Slab phones were becoming the preferred interface for smartphones.
      - as cool as the OS was, the user base wanted it built on, with extra features added, and Palm decided for whatever reason that it was going to focus on incremental things instead of sweeping new feature sets.
      - battery life was not good. Seriously. It was freaking horrible. Worse than your standard android phone.

    All these things worked against it, plus Sprint decided it was more in love with HTC, so Palm didn't get the kind of backing it was hoping for. But Palm did fumble a few times before HP took it over, so you're right that HP can't shoulder all the blame.

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
    1. Re:Not entirely true. by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't really know what all the complaints about the webOS Palm phones are about. Paid $30 for an unlocked GSM Palm Pixi Plus and it works swimmingly.

    2. Re:Not entirely true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have my pre and still use it every day, never ever had the battery come loose, and it's the first i've heard of that one!

      Slab phones are horrible :p

      The battery life is, in all honesty, quite variable, it depends what you use, if you have the browser/email going all the time then you can kiss it goodbye, if however you don't you'll get 24+ hours on a charge which isn't bad for a smart phone, also one thing that can help a lot, and actually ties in with your point about the user base, which has supported the webos devices quite activley, is to change the kernel cpu govenor, mine for example runs faster than stock when the screen is on but throttles down to 250mhz when it's off which massivley improves battery life!

  7. WebOS is quite nice actually by ranpel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's right, I said it.

    No complaints apart from hardware and the lack of a tide app.

    Contrary to popular spouting off a smartphone doesn't need the Internet except when you need the Internet. How you choose to draw that line should be your choice, not your phone's.

    There's no such thing as "rooting". Got root.

    Tweaking the thing can bring easy and quick rewards with a tiny bit of css and a tiny bit of html.

    I didn't get the fire sale pad but not for the lack of trying.

    I had an ipad once - it was a gift - it wanted iTunes on my computer - then it wanted the correct version of iTunes - then it wanted an OSX upgrade - then I lost interest - I traded it for a new suspension kit for my ride. Couldn't be happier. iWhat? Nothing.

    What was I ... right, I hope that WebOS finds itself a firm footing somewhere, truly I do.

    --
    \r
    1. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I totally agree with you on WebOS. I really liked it and at first thought it would be a stiff competitor to iOS. Sadly too late did I realize "Stiff" meant dead.

      However on iOS, they have solved the problem you mentioned - you can buy an iOS device now and never have it touch a computer. Even backups are done on iCloud. Far better for all.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      iCloud is the one ring to rule them all.

      Seriously, Apple and privacy are different solar systems. Even if you like Apple, you shouldn't have to trust them, and you shouldn't trust them.

    3. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      However on iOS, they have solved the problem you mentioned - you can buy an iOS device now and never have it touch a computer.

      But then how do you get stuff from your computer to the iOS device? Uploading all my personal suff to the cloud doesn't sound much better than installing iTunes, and it's hardly as easy as just copying the damn files to a USB device like most phones/tablets.

      Android devices can connect via wifi and Samba shares, is that available for iOS?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Apple, Microsoft, Google, Comcast, Verizon... all are far away from privacy. I like Google best of the group because they release the most open source software, but in terms of privacy there is no winner in the bunch. Use the cloud, but don't trust it.

    5. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use some of the phone's functionality without a computer. But what if you do something simple, like put your MP3s you want to put on your phone?

      That's right. You're SOL, unless you put iTunes on a computer and sync that way.

    6. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your ride is an iRoc-Z?

    7. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Your response does not make sense to me. You have "mp3" files. WHere are they then - on a computer? Oh, you already HAVE a computer, well then what's the big deal about running them through iTunes? And really you don't even have to do that, in theory you could put them all in dropbox and use the iOS dropbox client to get to them (I think, have not tried).

      I am talking about the case where someone can use an iPad and have no computer at all. They have no MP3 files, or even files - they just have an iPad. That is possible now.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      iOS can sync over WiFi. There are probably apps that let you mount SMB shares (I know there is source to do so), there is also a Dropbox client.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    9. Re:WebOS is quite nice actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well then what's the big deal about running them through iTunes?

      Nothing, IF YOU ALREADY HAVE A MAC. On Windows, installing iTunes is the surest way I know to make sure that your PC will live down to all the worst Windows stereotypes. *Every* Windows computer on which I've ever installed iTunes has rapidly begun sliding down the steep slippery slope to unusability.

      Why the heck can't I just have my phone show up as a disk on the network, and just drag stuff (including music!) onto and off of it? I made the mistake of buying the 32 GB version of the iPhone 4s, and since I can't put music on it, I guess I'm just going to have to take a lot of pictures (and email off the ones I want anywhere else, since I can't do anything else with those without iTunes, too...)

      Overall, I'm actually extremely disappointed in the iPhone (although I don't think I would be much happier with Android) - the most incredible thing is that from a PDA perspective, neither platform even approaches the usability and functionality of the Palm platform circa 1997!

      We're stuck with some pretty stupid "smart" phones now, and I for one, am just about fed up with it... Viva WebOS!!

  8. I love my HP Touchpad by hemp · · Score: 1

    It even runs flash.

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:I love my HP Touchpad by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Proof that you've been smoking your namesake rather than making clothing out of it.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  9. I'd comment but... by poena.dare · · Score: 1

    ...this webOS browser is like slow burning syphilis. The only, and I mean only, thing that's right here is the $99 price tag.

    YMMV for phones, sure. But for a tablet webOS is like a delicious cake made without leavening.

    1. Re:I'd comment but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a better browser that should be available soon for the Touchpad:
      http://www.webosnation.com/webos-internals-working-hp-getting-isis-browser-and-qtwebkit-current-devices

    2. Re:I'd comment but... by Pitr · · Score: 1

      Really? 'cause mine's just fine, in WebOS or android. Even runs complex flash stuff respectably (as in better than some not-too-old desktops). Maybe it just seems like it's taking forever because of your slow burning syphilis, but I have no basis for comparison.

      --

      --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
    3. Re:I'd comment but... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      What bullshit. How would a slashdot virgin catch syphilis to know what it feels like?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:I'd comment but... by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      from toilet seats of course!

  10. When Palm shot themselves in their foot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a long time Palm user, but one thing that I noticed that no one talks about, is when and how it shot itself in the foot.

    I've narrowed it down to the day that they no longer offered FREE O/S upgrades.

    Previously, Palm had advertised that they would always offer the newest O/S versions for free. Life was good. You knew that if they improved something, you could go online and download. But you knew there would be a time that the newest version wouldn't run on you device. It wasn't an issue, because you knew by then, you would have worn out whatever device you had and it would be time to buy a new one.

    But NOOOOooooooo. Palm screwed themselves when they changed their story, and started charging for every major O/S update. That's when myself, and many people I knew dropped Palm (well, only after their devices finally died. I held out with my Palm V for MANY years, but it finally ran out it's magic smoke one day).

  11. "Other OSes" by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He seem to never heard of Maemo or the N900. If well not successful (for some values of successful, at least) had a lot of ideas other OSes should copy. In front of Android i felt crippled after more than a year with Maemo, mainly because how natural was for me to be really running several applications at once, even with that hardware. Maemo development diverted to Meego, that ended losing ground by the 2 companies backing it, and now could be in the horizon Tizen, Meltemi or whatever ends being the flavor of the semester.

    WebOS is good anyway, even when the environment seemed to be with less community push than Maemo. A lot of its features, joined with maemo/meego/whatever ones, could make an interesting portable device OS. But the handset makers and carriers had already picked their alternatives, and there is little room for others (specially, without big enough backers), what is a shame,

    1. Re:"Other OSes" by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      Maemo will be reincarnated as Kubuntu Mobile - it's being used as the foundation, as I understand it.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  12. Return of the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After I got over the paragraph about how certainly things "constantly happen" to the poor guy who deletes emails right before replying to them, I calmed down and read. And it turns out webOS really did invent something: the uninvented the crippled "it's not a desktop" desktop. It really looks like they got over some of the stupid bullshit that makes phones/tablets suck so much. Look at the features this guy is excited about.

    The uninvented getting rid of windows. That's what the cards and screens and task-switching and (part of) the notifications points are about. When you have windows, all the problems that arise from taking away windows, go away.

    The uninvented not-using-filesystems. (Drastically oversimplifying) This guy mounts whatever network filesystems he wants to, and the apps can save to and load from them.

    They didn't uninvent not-having-a-keyboard or uninvent counter-productive auto-correction, but the webOS team tried the hardest of all, to have a keyboard despite the lack of having a keyboard, and to make autocorrection the least destructive to entering what you want. Of course, it "works best with a hardware keyboard" (that's a verbatim quota from TFA).

    If this sounds mocking, I don't mean it that way (at least not completely -- the TFA's style makes it hard to not mock). This is serious. It sounds like webOS is the least phone/tablet-like phone/tablet OS, which really is why it sucks the least -- it has thrown away the fewest proven ideas replacing them with Jobsian reality distortion.

    1. Re:Return of the Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with you. For the record, I do have an iOS device or two (Touch 2G, nano 5G), an Android phone (LG Op S, rooted with CM7), and the Touchpad ('rooted' and dual booting with CM7). The thing is, when they killed off the development of the Touchpad, I immediately went around looking at the dual boot options to get CM7 on it and succeeded. The truth of the matter is that I haven't booted up CM7 in a very long time because -I JUST DON'T NEED TO-. Surfing, checking stuff out, emailing, streaming videos (via connecting to my HTPC via splashtop), all easily handled via webOS.

      Much like the late Steve Jobs used to tout: it just works.

  13. Cards & Multitasking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hands down BEST WebOS feature which absolutely MUST be ported to all other mobile OS's = Card style app MULTI-TASKING, with wipe to close. After using WebOS for 10 minutes, that's the absolute biggest pain in the ass you recognize that exists with every mobile phone OS. Why is task management such a god damn process (no pun) for the competition? Why do I need to start another app just to kill something?

    Card style app management is just so intuitive, all the way down to the gestures in controlling them.

    Palm sucked at some things for sure... but when that company got something right, they nailed it.

    1. Re:Cards & Multitasking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android ICS has that, at least CM9 does, by default.

    2. Re:Cards & Multitasking by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      Nails on a chalkboard when using iPhone or Android after i was with my Palm Pre for 2 years. I have an Android device now, and the fact that you have to HOLD down a button for any amount of time to switch between apps is insanity. I want to quick-click and flip. I used to be able to flip between apps/screens within half a second. Those days of glorious UI design are done I'm afraid.

      Not to mention that neither Android or iOS were TRUE multi-tasking like webOS, where I could have multiple apps open and running at the same time, and I mean RUNNING, not this "saved session state" crap!

    3. Re:Cards & Multitasking by linhux · · Score: 1

      Check out Nokia N9, it wins this game hands down.

    4. Re:Cards & Multitasking by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      +1 Agree wholeheartedly. Disclaimer: I have never used webOS - flame me if you will.

      From my experience, Android multitasking sucks when it comes to switching tasks, iOS doesn't rate at all, Maemo was good compared to both of those but from what I have seen of how webOS handles it, I would gladly have that on my phone. Shame their promotion wasn't a bit better, I would have bought.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    5. Re:Cards & Multitasking by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I found a video on youtube after searching for webos multitasking. It was the one where some guy named Dieter was demonstrating how he would use or open about a dozen apps so that he wouldn't have to use two fingers later.

      Though I might not get that busy, it was very impressive They are worth getting excited about, as someone above noted. Those guys at Unity better watch it if they want to get a leg up.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    6. Re:Cards & Multitasking by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with Android is that Multitasking seems really hit or miss for me. I like Opera as the web browser on Android. If I go between it and another app, it seems hit or miss when I come back to Opera if it will still have my tabs open - heck, it generally seems to either re-load from scratch (why???) or just lose that I had tabs open at all.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  14. I miss the card metaphor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    webOS has an outstanding UX, especially in the area of multitasking management. The card metaphor is the thing I really miss about my Pre (among many other things that I don't -- poor hardware and unoptimized software).

  15. So Basically turn IOS int ICS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just about all of the features of webOS are available in Icecream sandwich...

    1. Re:So Basically turn IOS int ICS? by phoebus1553 · · Score: 2

      Just about all of the features of webOS are available in Icecream sandwich...

      I have to agree there. Almost every point he made made me say "but my Xoom does exactly that." Granted there are like a total of 3 ICS devices in the wild right now, and the number of old devices that will get it is a mystery, you CAN have those features he desires. It's almost as if he didn't realize that there was another option to iOS, webOS and... Windows Phone 7(and the future 8)? Seriously, how did Windows even make the list??

      --
      ----- - The beatings will continue until morale improves
    2. Re:So Basically turn IOS int ICS? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Yeah , reading his article on my galaxy nexus I must admit his criticisms strike me as a bit...quaint.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    3. Re:So Basically turn IOS int ICS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quaint? He's asking for features that Android is just now wedging into ICS two+ years after WebOS came out. And ICS is barely out yet itself, much less embedded enough that its new features are foregone conclusions.

      "Quaint" indeed. I must admit your criticisms strike me as a bit...pretentious.

  16. WebOS sucked by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 0

    ...CheapCharlie plastic hardware made it feel cheesy in your hands. FAIL

    1. Re:WebOS sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're a real smarty-pants, judging an OS by the hardware it ran on.

  17. Document Management by zbobet2012 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Document management on iOS is a mess. Every application implements its own scheme.

    This is probably one of the best notes he makes. While hiding document management from the user initially may simplify things, the reality is that every single user needs sophisticated document management in the long run. iOS's biggest mistake was here; simpler document management should equate to more elegant, more usable document management, not more naieve management.

    Its saddening to me today that Windows 7 search / OSX's Spotlight still don't meet the level of sophistication that zsh's globbing syntax does. Where are the document systems that automatically cross reference, sort by category etc? The filesystem on my PC is less sophisticated than google search by orders of magnitude, and slower too. Whats worse is that the iOS act of simply removing it from the users view is trying to creep back into the PC world.

  18. All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You Android lets you do a whole hell of a lot more than just changing a few resource files around, right?

    I guess you are not aware of the purpose of Cydia which is hacking any application at any level, including the system, Lots of mods go far beyond mere themes.

    A Jailbroken iOS device is more hackable than Android because it's more practical to make small modifications to any application.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by oakgrove · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Like what for example? Without even jail breaking Android, I can take any apk apart, make changes and put it back together. And the Android system itself is open source so I can root my device, download the source code to the operating system and make any changes I want. I have a jail broken iPad and several rooted Android devices. Yeah I can make a few changes to the iPad here and there like replacing spring board and enabling the installation of unsigned apps. Both capabilities of which android has out of the box btw. But I can't even get a decent python install on it. What's available sucks. With Android, I can chroot an entire GNU/Linux install like Debian on it. I'm sure there are a lot of really cool superficial mods that can be done with iOS but can it be run on a wristwatch?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    2. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      Without even jail breaking Android, I can take any apk apart, make changes and put it back together.

      How would you change a single class?

      Cydia makes code injection trivial for any class in an application - without having to take apart anything. If all you want to do is change an icon why are you blathering on about how jailbreaking is only themes?

      And the Android system itself is open source so I can root my device, download the source code to the operating system and make any changes I want.

      I don't have to do any of that, I can simply modify a system class at one point.

      That's why it's better for hacking, much less effort for the same level of system or application modification (and I am doubtful how easily you can change the code of any arbitrary application).

      can it be run on a wristwatch?

      I don't know but I do know you can use your phone as a workbench or serving platter at a party. How handy.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      How would you change a single class?

      To do what exactly. "Changing a class" is just a means to an an end. What are you trying to accomplish?

      Cydia makes code injection trivial for any class in an application - without having to take apart anything

      You are so blinded by fanaticism that you can't see something so simple as the fact that a) when an app is taken apart on android and changes to it are made then its put back together you aren't relying on something so crude as injecting code at run time. You now have a new application that can be installed on any device in the futere rooted or not and changes persist.

      f all you want to do is change an icon why are you blathering on about how jailbreaking is only themes?

      You're inventing a narrative as I said no such thing.

      I don't have to do any of that, I can simply modify a system class at one point.

      You are talking about 2 completely different things. Also, you are getting subjective and pretending like your opinion carries some special weight. It doesn't. You're just another loudmouth fan boy who thinks his way is best.

      That's why it's better for hacking, much less effort for the same level of system or application modification

      You're delusional if you think changing classes at run time is easier or as exhaustive as a complete recompile of a binary. If what you are saying is right we'd all just do it your way when writing applications. I mean fuck writing anything from scratch I'll just change a class on $EXISTING_APP. Laughable.

      an it be run on a wristwatch?

      I don't know but I do know you can use your phone as a workbench or serving platter at a party. How handy.

      Your attempt at a stupid snark answer doesn't conceal that you've reached a fundamental limit to your "change classes" approach. I have the source code therefore Android runs on my watch if I want it to. And it does. How many classes would you have to change to run iOS on new hardware? That's what I thought.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    4. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      To do what exactly. "Changing a class" is just a means to an an end. What are you trying to accomplish?

      Anything I want.

      You are so blinded by fanaticism that you can't see something so simple as the fact that a) when an app is taken apart on android and changes to it are made then its put back together you aren't relying on something so crude as injecting code at run time.

      I was a Java programmer for well over a decade.

      Please do go on with exact technical details on how you change or add code to that package you tore apart.

      You're delusional if you think changing classes at run time is easier or as exhaustive as a complete recompile of a binary.

      And you are ignorant if you cannot see how much more easy and powerful that technique is. I don't "tear apart" or replace a binary, I just say "here's my code to add to this and that class for this application and replace this method call"

      I mean fuck writing anything from scratch I'll just change a class on $EXISTING_APP

      You laugh but that is mostly better. I can ALSO write any app from scratch, but it's nice a lot of times to take some application that you really like and add enhancements. The fact you cannot see that marks you as a simpleton.

      Your attempt at a stupid snark answer doesn't conceal that you've reached a fundamental limit to your "change classes" approach. I have the source code therefore Android runs on my watch if I want it to.

      Your failed attempt at a reply ignores the fact your powers end at the OS (the only thing for which you have source), whereas in a jalbroken iOS device the options for change are boundless and encompass any third party apps which I can change just as easily as the OS and in a simpler way (since I don't have to figure out how to compile a whole system or application, I just add a class or two of new code).

      I'll let you have the last response since I don't intend to read anymore of your technically ignorant blatherings going forward, keep digging that hole though if you wish.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      [opinion piece editorial snipped]*ed

      I'll let you have the last response since I don't intend to read anymore of your technically ignorant blatherings going forward, keep digging that hole though if you wish.

      Oh yeah, "La la la, I win! I can't hear you! La la la!". Don't run from me. You go on and on about how you can "change classes" blah blah blah but you have yet to give me one specific example. I have my jail broken iPad sitting in front of me. Please just give one really good example of what you are talking about that I can't do with my Xoom. I'm waiting. If you don't have anything I'll take your silence as tacit submission.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    6. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also guessing you don't understand the power and elegance of Objective C.

      Jobs is gone. The RDF is fading fast. Give it up.

    7. Re:All of Cydia is a system modification warehouse by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Look, I can go to the Android Marketplace and download tons of customization software straight from Google.

      Apple specifically forbids you from making changes to the user interface of iOS if you want to distribute anything through their app store, which is the *only* sanctioned way of getting software for iOS.

      If you can't see the difference, there's really no point in arguing with you. But we already knew that, because you can't have an honest discussion about your sacred cow.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
  19. So you've never used an iPad... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ipads dont have rotation lock like the Galaxy Tab.

    If you ever get a chance to use a real tablet, check the sides. That's where the iPad keeps the rotation lock. It'll probably be really easy for you to find as I'm sure Samsung just put it in exactly the same place.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So you've never used an iPad... by metacell · · Score: 1

      The Galaxy Tab 10.1 doesn't have a hardware rotation lock. It's a software option on the bottom right menu.

      Not that it diminishes your point...

    2. Re:So you've never used an iPad... by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the correction, odd they did not choose to copy that aspect as I find it handy.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:So you've never used an iPad... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Ipads dont have rotation lock like the Galaxy Tab.

      If you ever get a chance to use a real tablet, check the sides. That's where the iPad keeps the rotation lock.

      You mean a physical hardware rotation lock? I didn't realize that.

      Another complaint that I've heard from iPad owners was that their rotation lock was only application-specific, not system-wide (on Android, it's system-wide which in hindsight would seem like the only natural way to do it). Were those people also only talking about their first generation iPads, and not the the second generation? Or may be, they were just idiots (since their complaints seemed to contradict your claim). That, I actually don't know.

      It'll probably be really easy for you to find as I'm sure Samsung just put it in exactly the same place.

      Only the Toshiba Android tablet has a physical hardware rotation lock (that I've seen, and no, I haven't been at the last CES, so there should be more by now). The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has its rotation lock in software accessible from the bottom right corner of its screen (like most of the Android tablets), and as I said it's system-wide. Personally, I would prefer having it as a hardware button like the Toshiba Android tablet did it (thought, I didn't care much for the rest of the Toshiba tablet).

    4. Re:So you've never used an iPad... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Were those people also only talking about their first generation iPads, and not the the second generation?

      They've all had hardware rotation locks. Apple kind of fiddled with it at one point though (iOS5) and made it optional to have it be a silence switch instead, (you can toggle which behavior you prefer) which may have led some people to think it was not working.

      iOS also has a software rotation lock (for iPad and iPhone) if you double tap the home button and slide the icon tray over.

      The iPhone treats the switch as silence only, I don't think it has an option to treat it as a rotation lock the way the iPad does.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:So you've never used an iPad... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The Lenovo K1 has a hardware "lock" slider button on one side. Have to admit I find it useless - not because I don't want it to work, I do, but because most apps just ignore it, which means switching it on actually makes the tablet less pleasant and consistant to work with, not more.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:So you've never used an iPad... by metacell · · Score: 1

      They didn't copy the iPad feature by feature. They just used the elements which were most popular and made most sense. For example, making a thin tablet with thin borders around the display is just common sense, once technology allows it and it's been shown that the public likes it and is prepared to pay for it.

      Another feature they didn't copy was the design of the power and volume buttons. On the Galaxy Tab 10.1, both buttons have the same shape and are placed beside each other; the volume button is just a little longer. This makes it easy to press the wrong button and accidentally turn off your tablet.

      Samsung's no Apple, but they provide pretty good value for your money.

  20. all these comments by alienzed · · Score: 2

    and not a single feature described. *sigh*

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  21. As an iPhone 4S user by localman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to admit some of this stuff had me absolutely drooling - particularly the app and multi-window management. Damn - it's much better than what Apple is doing right now.

    They should absolutely use some of these ideas. Unfortunately I'm afraid Apple wouldn't even look at this stuff. They've got the NIH mentality bad.

    1. Re:As an iPhone 4S user by narcc · · Score: 1

      particularly the app and multi-window management

      The BlackBerry PlayBook does this, and does it well.

    2. Re:As an iPhone 4S user by marsu_k · · Score: 2

      Oh they'll get around eventually. Notifications in iOS 5, for example, could be said to be heavily influenced by another mobile OS. But when Apple finally apes those things, you can bet they'll be revolutionary and magical.

  22. You want WebOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut your cakeholes and get a Playbook then.

    If you could stop your self-righteous internal diatribes that spew themselves onto the web for 60 seconds you might actually find what you were looking for.

    Edit: The captcha for this post was 'contempt'

    1. Re:You want WebOS? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the PlayBook already "stole" a ton of the really great ideas from WebOS. The corner of the screen even "glows red" with new notifications.

      It's no secret that those ideas contribute greatly to the fantastic UI that the PlayBook is famous for. Add QNX, solid hardware, and the great new features of OS2, and you'd be hard-pressed to find a better tablet on the market.

      Of course, RIM makes the PlayBook so in Slashdot land that makes it automatically useless. It totally sucks having the best HTML5 support along with WebGL and desktop quality Flash in my lightning-fast browser. It's terrible to have real-time multitasking and an UI that let's the user take advantage of it.

  23. not the same (got CM9 on my touchpad) by Chirs · · Score: 3, Informative

    WebOS has the ability to stack and organize cards. CM9 has the "recently used" apps list that you can swipe away, but as far as I know that's all you can do with them. On WebOS you can get to the task cards by swiping up from the bottom bezel anywhere along the bottom. With CM9 you have to hit a specific button.

    If I could have android apps on WebOS, I'd be a happy man.

    1. Re:not the same (got CM9 on my touchpad) by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's more than a recently used app list. It's an interface to force close running apps or apps with saved states. It is an excellent interface for multitasking once you figure out how to use it.

      I agree that it could do with a "sorting" system of sorts, but for a phone anyway it's not really needed as the little memory most phones have causes Android to flush running apps that haven't been touched in a while.

    2. Re:not the same (got CM9 on my touchpad) by lordbah · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those who moved from a webOs phone to an Android phone to get better hardware. One of the things which gets me about Android is that when I look at the recent apps list, *it doesn't tell me which apps are actually running*. Anything in the list might still be running, or it might not. It might be chewing CPU cycles, or it might not. It might be using data bandwidth, or it might not. Advantage: cards. The set of apps in the recent apps list may include a few apps I am presently switching between to accomplish some set of tasks and may also include other apps I have recently run as a one-off. Having the one-offs there is a slight dilution of my focus. I can swipe them off of the list. But if I've already exited the app from its menu, then also having to swipe it away here is unnecessary extra effort. Advantage: cards.

    3. Re:not the same (got CM9 on my touchpad) by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      On any Android 2.x or above just hold down the home button for a faction of a second and you get the task switcher. Doesn't seem any more effort or any slower than having to swipe.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  24. lots of little issues. (Have ICS on my touchpad) by Chirs · · Score: 1

    ICS has small cards for running apps, but you can't move them around, stack them, etc.

    I have yet to find a decent keyboard layout for ICS. I want the numbers and common punctuation available without having to drop into a second layer.

    Changing brightness on stock CM9 is two taps, a swipe up, and a swipe to adjust the brightness. On WebOS it's a tap and a swipe. There's lot's of room on the screen, CM9 could easily display all the options but they chose not to.

    On stock CM9 there's no quick way to mute it. On WebOS it's two taps.

  25. ...and so is BB 10 since yesterday by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Many of the system concepts of webOS were launched by Blackberry yesterday. I actually keep a Pre2 charged in my bag (and turn it on to sync and update periodically) simply because I like it so much, and if my company BB ever gives up the ghost, I have a backup while it is replaced. But the release of rev. 2 for the Playbook and the tight integration with the phone (which is where HP were going with the Pre3 and the Touchpad) is now impressive. The ability to use the phone as a remote control for the PB removes the need for a laptop for almost all presentations, as is the ability to open remote documents. The reverse process (at a desk, use the tablet as the messaging interface for the phone, providing a bigger keyboard and easier to read screen) shows that BB actually think about people over 30. The "swipe" system is actually slightly better than webOS (the off screen area being on all 4 sides, not just one).

    So: my conclusion is that since yesterday someone is making use of the best concepts of webOS. Perhaps unexpectedly, it's RIM.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  26. Yes... by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    and, as I note above, the tight phone integration that was also a feature of the webOS/Touchpad concept.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  27. Apps in HTML and Javascript = BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked at the API when the Palm Pre came out. Admittedly, I did not look in that much detail.

    But an API that forced me to write in Javascript on a phone seemed a bad idea, or a way to create simple dummy apps. Compared to Android development, this seemed stupid.

  28. Obvious comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there something new in this assertion?
    Every modern OS has something that should be copied and integrated by the other ones.
    This is called "digital evolution".

  29. Alas.. by synapse7 · · Score: 1

    I miss using the palm pre I had.

  30. Apple will sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they don't steal it first

  31. Android Has These by AJH16 · · Score: 1

    Does it bother anyone else that most of the ideas he is asking someone to take from WebOS already exist in Android Honeycomb and ICS?

    Switching apps is a two click process with screens nicely organized from recent and running apps.
    The windows are similarly organized for switching apps.
    System wide accounts have been supported since at least Android 2.1 (Eclair)
    Keyboard is more a preference and not really anything special compared to some of the keyboards available on Android.
    Notifications... hello... this has been in Android for as long as I can remember.
    Settings access in ICS is available directly from the notification pull down and is available directly from the clock in Honeycomb.

    The multiple screens thing is the only thing that WebOS has from the article that Android doesn't currently have, if not has had for a while now. It's still a nice right up on the capabilities of WebOS, but to pretend that the ideas are not already out there in other platforms is silly.

    --
    AJ Henderson
  32. Great software, terrible hardware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Pre. Wonderful software, absolutely dreadful hardware.

    Thing couldn't get a GPS lock to save its life, indoors, outdoors, wherever.

    Battery (with normal use, with GPS turned off, WiFi off, and push off) lasted roughly 12 hours. If it couldn't find a 3G signal, it would cycle between radios constantly, killing the battery even faster. I had to carry a spare battery around.

    The keyboard was an extra tiny portrait style. Why?!!!!!!! Who has fingers small enough to use that thing?

    The edge of the keyboard slider was sharp enough to slice cheese.

    The Touchstone never worked, as the magnets weren't strong enough to keep it from sliding off over time.

    Sometimes, opening the keyboard would make the battery fall out.

    Did no one test these before they went out?

  33. Mod parent up by shiftless · · Score: 1

    Why is this downmodded? He makes a good point. "Do as I say, not as I do" is also a common lesson than the typical mom teaches her kids.

  34. I'm a troll! by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    Sheesh, apparently posting one link that provides a graphical comparison is enough to get me modded down to 0 and marked a troll. Amazing how worked up some people get over phones.

    The reason I was so surprised upon seeing the icon comparison...I do not believe that some of the elements could not have just happened to end up so similar by chance. The graphical composition of the buttons is very similar in many cases!

    For example, the pictures button just happens to have a yellow flower? Why a flower? Why a YELLOW flower with green highlights? Similar arguments could be made for the most of the buttons, IMHO. I'm not one to argue that a green dial button is a dealbreaker, but do other phones have a white phone outline on a green background at the same angle? If anything, I would say that the last link you provides just shows how much room for originality and differences there are amongst the problem domain "design phone icons."

    It's enough to make me believe that Samsung's designers absolutely did copy from Apple. Whether you believe that's a good thing, a bad thing, or an illegal thing is another question. I have an iPhone (old 3gs) and I like it. Whenever it dies, I'll get a new phone. I have not liked the Android phones I have used, though to be fair I have not tried ICS. Not sure why some people get so incredibly emotional over the issue!