Slashdot Mirror


Gates Foundation Makes Progress On Reinvented Toilets

Julie188 writes "Last summer the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to spend millions to reinvent the toilet. That investment has born fruit with teams from around the world coming up with many different ways to turn human waste into energy."

40 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Upgraded toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... now come with a Start button. Blue loo of death, anyone?

    1. Re:Upgraded toilets by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

      "First World Problems", indeed.

      Maybe you could employ an immigrant to wipe your ass for you. Do your bit to help the poor people.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Upgraded toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bill Gates should work on toilets that are more sanitary to use. First if we could avoid wiping with paper this would be awesome.

      1. Visit Japan
      2. Find a supplier
      3. Import modern toilets
      4. Profit!

      Seriously. The Japanese have toilets that automatically wash and blow-dry your ass, and sing to you while they do it.
      Meanwhile, we here in the "civilized West" still shit in porcelain buckets.

    3. Re:Upgraded toilets by jbengt · · Score: 2

      Have to comment, since I design plumbing for a living:
      It's true that "water saving" 3.5 gal per flush water closets are no longer sold, but the current standard is 1.6 gallons per flush (not 1 gallon as stated by the parent post). There are some ultra-low flow units being sold that are 1.28 gallons per flush, but almost none less than that.
      A few years after 1.6 gpf was mandated in most codes, testing was done which found that many 3.5 gallon-per-flush water closets performed worse than most of the new 1.6 gpf fixtures, and on average there was no real reduction in performance going with the lower flow fixtures. (Of course, if similar research and development had been put into the 3.5 gpf fixtures, they could have been improved)
      While I do double flush, I have a 3.5 gpf toilet at my house that I regularly block up, and I'm pretty sure that I could stop up one of the old 5 gallons per flush toilets, too.

  2. MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has to be said.

    1. Re:MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by Myria · · Score: 4, Funny

      the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to spend millions to reinvent the toilet. That investment has born fruit

      I'm not sure I want to know what kind of fruit a toilet has to bear.

      --
      "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  3. I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't want to say anything bad about Bill, but this sounds like a pretty shitty idea.

    1. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Intelligenta · · Score: 5, Informative

      To be honest, the amount of good Bill Gates has done for the world is quite remarkable. Since 2007 he has given away $28 billion, saving 6 million lives. That's $2 billion more than US budget for foreign aid. Say what you want about Gates or Microsoft, but he really has helped the world with the money he made.

    2. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      --
      Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    3. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      ..plus Vista

      Come on guys, don't mock the guy just because his earlier public toilet initiatives were less effective.

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    4. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Tarlus · · Score: 2

      I would hate to think about all that money going down the crapper.

      --
      /* No Comment */
  4. KISS Principle by EnempE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of these things seem rather complicated and use materials that aren't easy to obtain.

    To provide greater benefit the machine should be able to be manufactured without specialized tools and be able to be built with universally available, preferably recyclable or re-purposed materials. If people can make a living out of making and servicing these toilets then the sanitary and economic (from the created industry) benefit will spread quickly and independently without requiring the oversight of a foreign NGO.

    1. Re:KISS Principle by davester666 · · Score: 2

      They just use a small amount of enriched uranium to aid in tracking where each unit is at all times. Geiger counters are cheaper than RFID readers and more reliable.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  5. Crucial by BoydWaters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who thinks this is a silly idea needs to spend two weeks in a city without modern plumbing.

    1. Re:Crucial by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

      Yep.. they go out on Friday and are collected on Sunday, dead handy for the Friday night party crowd and much better than having desperate and partied-out people pissing in doorways.

      Behind those doorways is a city with sufficient toilets backed by a infrastructure that, although aging, still works and is being improved.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  6. Must be missing something... by GumphMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why reinvent the toilet when we already have perfectly functional, no-energy (or very low energy) composting toilet and urine diversion options? What is it about these options that does not meet the criteria?

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    1. Re:Must be missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why reinvent the toilet when we already have perfectly functional, no-energy (or very low energy) composting toilet and urine diversion options? What is it about these options that does not meet the criteria?

      Somebody influential won't make a profit.

    2. Re:Must be missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean somebody effluential won't make a profit

    3. Re:Must be missing something... by jakedata · · Score: 2

      I own several composting toilets. I am looking forward to something far better.

      If you want to "flush" to the composting location then you need an ultra-low water head. This is problematic for many reasons. If you don't want a flush then you need to rely on gravity and need a vent fan to keep the bad air out of the house. This is problematic too.

      If the compost gets too dry, the process slows, and you end up with fungus that attracts fungus flies. If the compost gets too wet, well ewww.... you have to clean out the system before it overflows.

      In winter the compost may not generate enough heat to keep the system from freezing. More ewww...

      It is especially difficult to run a system with guests. Imagine spending 10 minutes explaining how to use the toilet. What can go in, what can't, how to flush, what is that stuff down there...

    4. Re:Must be missing something... by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      It is especially difficult to run a system with guests. Imagine spending 10 minutes explaining how to use the toilet. What can go in, what can't, how to flush, what is that stuff down there...

      You still get guests? Wow :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  7. The hate by santax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Long time linux lover here. Long time hater of MS policy and business practice. However, this man, who was once the richest man in the world has in the latest 15 years of his life great things for humanity. Things that actually make a different for people. I don't care how much you hate windows or Gates as the former president of that company, but surely you can't be against him spending so much of his fortune (and sure, he has enough money to have a comfortable life even with doing this) to make lifes better... Give the guy a break on this part. He has spend a fortune on his foundation and did so with many great projects that actually got shit done. (no phun intended)

    1. Re:The hate by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I'm reading you correctly, you'd rather see him widen the wealth gap between the U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world ? The funny thing about wealth gaps is they tend to trigger acts of extreme violence to rebalance the equation. It is FAR more beneficial to humankind, to help the 3rd world deal with some of their most basic problems. Who's to say, maybe in 30 years from now, an African that was given access to education, sanitation and employment might discover a (realistic) cure for AIDS.

      I'd go as far as saying that there is not much hope left for the U.S., because its control structures are far beyond repair, its human capital bottlenecked by the very pursuit of wealth. Throwing more money into a broken hyperpower only makes the rich richer. Throwing money into a 3rd world nation has the potential to bring sweeping changes.

      Ultimately, it's about inching toward a unified world view. To think or act otherwise is notihng more than racism and elitism.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:The hate by operagost · · Score: 2

      U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world

      Why are we focusing on the USA?

      I'd go as far as saying that there is not much hope left for the U.S., because its control structures are far beyond repair, its human capital bottlenecked by the very pursuit of wealth.

      Oh, I see. Maybe it's because there is no free market, just crony capitalism?

      Ultimately, it's about inching toward a unified world view. To think or act otherwise is notihng more than racism and elitism.

      Ad hominems are no substitute for hard data.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  8. Re:The shills Re:The hate by santax · · Score: 2

    I don't think you understand me. Not trying to speak up for MS at all. Speaking up for a guy who changed lives. On the pc - for the worst. In Afrika - for the better. And next time, show some balls. Use your account.

  9. Does It Clean Your Asshole? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been pondering this recently. Here in the USA we tend to feel pretty holier-than-though, but for the most part we have pretty dirty assholes. I mean, poo touched that and we just wipe it off with some paper. If poo touched your hand, would you be content to wipe it off with paper? So why do we tolerate it with our assholes?

    I'd love to see some demographics on countries sorted by asshole cleanliness. I'm guessing that just like education and health care, the USA would be solidly in the middle of the pack. I suspect that Japan probably would have the most-clean assholes in the world, just based on their high end toilet technology. I'm not sure I want to speculate on the dirty end of the scale so as not to risk diplomatic incident.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I recommend the arse cleaning hoses found in Malaysia. They don't have the size or expense of a seperate bidet and they're not resident in the unhygenic toilet pot like Japanese integrated bidets. You just lift it off its hook on the wall, point the spray nozzle at your butthole, twist the tap and bam, no more shit on your o-ring. But either way, the European bidet has existed for a century now, there's always been that option at home, the Malaysian hose is the only option small, cheap and simple enough for institutional toilets.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    2. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by exa · · Score: 2

      Dude, you have a funny way of putting this hygiene problem so I'll answer :) This happens to be a problem that I've thought about sporadically!

      In our country, Turkey, we use both toilet paper and water to clean our assholes. Because traditionally, in the ala turca toilet they used water. So we ended up adding a small water pipe to the ala franca closet.

      But I have never seen a Japanese toilet. Is it possible that they use a water jet, and then a robotic asshole cleaning wipe with nanotech disinfectants, a laser to kill germs, and then a warm air jet which dries the said area, with complimentary cream on demand?

      --
      --exa--
    3. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by ChinggisK · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bah, you think the RIAA is bad, just you wait until Big Toilet Paper has its business model threatened by modern technology...

    4. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't touch my food with my asshole.

      Nor do I touch door handles and other things that other people will touch with my asshole.

      Nor do I "shake assholes" with people.

  10. This is highly overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, we can separate this into 2 different camps: developed vs. undeveloped.
    In the developed world, we have plumbing throughout, so the flush sends it to a central area. Now, how useful is that? 2 words: Joules Biotech. They are using genetically modified cyanobacteria, to kick out ethanol and diesel fuel. So, why is this special? Because this uses our sewage as feedstock. IOW, it turns crap into fuel. OTOH, the ideas being pushed here, require loads of energy to try and get rid of crap.

    Then you have the undeveloped world. Basically, we are talking, no plumbing. So, what matters most to them? Soap and a water bowl. Yes. For the vast majority of the world, they use their left hand to wipe their ass(which is why you do not use your left hand in nearly all parts of the world). We could help the undeveloped world by simply getting them resources such as soap to kill the bacteria that are on their hands, esp. the left one. For those of you that think that this is funny, keep in mind that the single highest killer of babies in 3rd world nations is diarrhea. Much of that is from the parents or siblings having dirty hands.

  11. Tree Bog by pfafrich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Best and simpest idea for a toilet I've seen is the tree bog. Its a raised platform over an enclosure space fenced off with chicken wire. Around the bog you plant willow or other greedy trees which rapidly consume the nutrients, effectively turning the poo into biomass. Aerobic decomposition has advantages over anaerobic decomposition and there is no smell if you use a layer of sawdust. The whole thing requires no maintenance as the poo decomposes very quickly. Not good for urban situations but ideal in rural environments.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
  12. Salt Water? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 2

    The whole idea behind these toilets is that water is scarce and the region is poor -- that's only half-true. If you want to get down to serious, cheap answers, fund plumbing of salt water in from the ocean -- it won't be useful for drinking without some prior preparation, but the toilets, if properly made, need not be an advanced technology to function. Plus if one goes through the trouble of piping in sea water, perhaps it would open up more inland areas to the possibility of desalination plants? The demand would be limited to simply drinking water and bathing, since the toilets would be "first priority" and not need to have a constant source of fresh water like the former two. The only issue I could really see here is a requirement for redundant plumbing, in areas where having too much plumbing must seem like...well, a pipe dream.

    1. Re:Salt Water? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did find this little gem.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_in_Hong_Kong#Seawater_flushing

      "In 1960 legislation was introduced to promote seawater flushing on a larger scale, followed by substantial investments in a separate network although the system was unpopular due to the need to build a separate plumbing network in each house. Seawater initially was sold, but from 1972 on it was provided for free and the costs of the system were recovered through the drinking water tariff. In 1991, about 65% of Hong Kong's households used seawater for flushing. By 1999, this percentage had increased to 79%"

    2. Re:Salt Water? by dargaud · · Score: 2
      At the coastal antarctic station where I worked we had a complex water pipe system between the dessalination plant and the station built as such: drinking water pipe inside a sea-water pipe going one way inside a sea-water pipe going the other way inside a thick layer of insulation.

      The reason for the two-way seawater was to continuously recirculate it to avoid freezing. And since sea-water is less prone to freezing than clear water, it was also a bonus. It wasn't actually sea-water but the even saltier (and warmer) remains from the dessalination process. And it was used for flushing.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  13. Make the plumbing out of sunlight and sand. by An+dochasac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Markus Kayser's solar sintering 3D printer shows what is possible when you use ingenuity, technology and two abundant desert resources, sunlight and sand. Mr. Kayser says he is already working with Kohler on the possibility of using solar powered, sand fed replicators like his to make sanitation products such as toilets and plumbing.

  14. Common Microsoft Fascination? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    Years ago it was the iLoo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILoo) I wonder what Microsoft's fascination is with crap?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  15. don't laugh: toilets are important by przemekklosowski · · Score: 2

    Some of my Scout parent friends are military doctors and they told me that better field latrines were a measurable factor in WWII. All armies had established procedures for setting them up, and the fastidius Germans did a solid job of it, if you pardon the pun---but the Americans added an additional step of covering the latrine box with a burlap sack as a fly barrier. The flies are a major disease vector, and as a result American troops were healthier and more combat ready.

  16. What an Unfortunate Choice of Metaphor by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article says Gate's toilet efforts have "born fruit".

    Yeuagh!

    Were these fruit "Dingleberries"?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  17. Twitter from the Shitter? by polyp2000 · · Score: 2

    I guess you might be able to "Share" your lavatory adventures too.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  18. Create a reputation, live with it. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    We in Latin America are very familiar with this behaviour.

    People that got the upper hand in business by all kind of dubious means start all kind of charitable work and sponsoring of the arts.

    It is called a PR exercise.

    One can't deny that these exercises can have benefits, sometimes immense ones, but they can't rewrite history or palliate the pain and anger of the people who suffered previous bad behaviour.

    What would impress me is if Bill would use his quite reasonable leverage to undo some of the damage his company did, for example stopping Microsoft patent trolling expeditions, bribing the necessary politicians with the respective campaign donations in order to change the idiotic copyright and patent systems in favour of the general public, or some other gesture saying "mea culpa".

    As it is, to all those who remember the other BIll, it is too much to ask to forgive (which I can) and forget (which I can't).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.