Slashdot Mirror


Gates Foundation Makes Progress On Reinvented Toilets

Julie188 writes "Last summer the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to spend millions to reinvent the toilet. That investment has born fruit with teams from around the world coming up with many different ways to turn human waste into energy."

112 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Upgraded toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... now come with a Start button. Blue loo of death, anyone?

    1. Re:Upgraded toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Classy, Coward, real classy. "We had it just as bad", "It's their fault obviously". So you're saying slavery did nothing to get your precious USA ahead, nor did it do anything to keep Africa back? You're saying that endless western meddling has been nothing but positive and helpful to these "foreign countries on the other side of the world"? Just a coincidence that the countries with the most natural resources are the poorest, while folks in NY and London get filthy rich from stealing same?

      I know, I know, don't feed the trolls.. Couldn't resist though, had to take the bait. What utter and unapologetic stupidity. You don't even deserve the TP, fool.

    2. Re:Upgraded toilets by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if the wall-paper for the new toilet is three seashells, I'll take my chances with being cryogenically frozen until December 31, 2999!

    3. Re:Upgraded toilets by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

      "First World Problems", indeed.

      Maybe you could employ an immigrant to wipe your ass for you. Do your bit to help the poor people.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Upgraded toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bill Gates should work on toilets that are more sanitary to use. First if we could avoid wiping with paper this would be awesome.

      1. Visit Japan
      2. Find a supplier
      3. Import modern toilets
      4. Profit!

      Seriously. The Japanese have toilets that automatically wash and blow-dry your ass, and sing to you while they do it.
      Meanwhile, we here in the "civilized West" still shit in porcelain buckets.

    5. Re:Upgraded toilets by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it gets infected if it operates slower. "Your request caused an invalid page fault in kernel32.flsh, Click here to report this problem"

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    6. Re:Upgraded toilets by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, you've never heard of a bidet? Look, I appreciate that you're trying to be a troll, but that's just lame.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    7. Re:Upgraded toilets by jbengt · · Score: 2

      Have to comment, since I design plumbing for a living:
      It's true that "water saving" 3.5 gal per flush water closets are no longer sold, but the current standard is 1.6 gallons per flush (not 1 gallon as stated by the parent post). There are some ultra-low flow units being sold that are 1.28 gallons per flush, but almost none less than that.
      A few years after 1.6 gpf was mandated in most codes, testing was done which found that many 3.5 gallon-per-flush water closets performed worse than most of the new 1.6 gpf fixtures, and on average there was no real reduction in performance going with the lower flow fixtures. (Of course, if similar research and development had been put into the 3.5 gpf fixtures, they could have been improved)
      While I do double flush, I have a 3.5 gpf toilet at my house that I regularly block up, and I'm pretty sure that I could stop up one of the old 5 gallons per flush toilets, too.

    8. Re:Upgraded toilets by Inconexo · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should get used, but the sensation of being spitted on this zone wasn't confortable to me.

    9. Re:Upgraded toilets by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Seems like newer toilets aren't as deep from seat to water level either. For me that's been a problem as well.

      Plumbers in my city also install one of those water displacing bucket looking things in the tank. Probably a local thing but what a pain in the ass to have to uninstall some bureaucratic bucket. So I have even less water, but it feels good and right to pass the blame on to Al 'FAIL' Gore, so I guess I'll live.

      Still kinda sucks to sit down and send willy for a dip in the cold on a strange toilet.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has to be said.

    1. Re:MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by Myria · · Score: 4, Funny

      the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to spend millions to reinvent the toilet. That investment has born fruit

      I'm not sure I want to know what kind of fruit a toilet has to bear.

      --
      "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    2. Re:MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dingleberries?

    3. Re:MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Mushrooms?

    4. Re:MS Windows: Human energy into waste. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Is maize a fruit?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't want to say anything bad about Bill, but this sounds like a pretty shitty idea.

    1. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Intelligenta · · Score: 5, Informative

      To be honest, the amount of good Bill Gates has done for the world is quite remarkable. Since 2007 he has given away $28 billion, saving 6 million lives. That's $2 billion more than US budget for foreign aid. Say what you want about Gates or Microsoft, but he really has helped the world with the money he made.

    2. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by DSS11Q13 · · Score: 1

      sure, but how many bombs has he dropped?

    3. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      --
      Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
    4. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by maroberts · · Score: 1

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      ..plus Vista

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    5. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      Bob will get you for that.

    6. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      He is a wolf in sheepclothes and in bed with one of the most dangerous companies in the world, Monsanto.

      No amount of good can make up for the criminal acts of that company.

    7. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      ..plus Vista

      Come on guys, don't mock the guy just because his earlier public toilet initiatives were less effective.

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    8. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by KiloByte · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A good part of that money goes into ensuring that developing countries will never be able to produce drugs they need on their own. They get pre-made drugs, counting their worth at a few orders of magnitude above the manufacture cost, with a string attached: in order to receive free drugs, they need to pass laws forbidding domestic manufacture of said drugs, aka "respecting intellectual property".

      Also, promoting Monsanto. Or, putting $50M into promoting male genital mutilation in Kenya while civilised people try to stop that barbaric practice.

      So Bill Gates' charity is double-edged at best.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    9. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      Bob will get you for that

      Melinda Gates.

      She was the one in charged of "Bob"

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    10. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by queBurro · · Score: 1

      sort of like Robin Hood? stealing from the poor, and then giving some of that back... to the poor?

      --
      sag
    11. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Tarlus · · Score: 2

      I would hate to think about all that money going down the crapper.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    12. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      You mean, other than Windows Me?

      ..plus Vista

      Don't forget the ribbon.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    13. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by DigiTechGuy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the US government.

    14. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Or, putting $50M into promoting male genital mutilation in Kenya

      You do realise that this "mutilation" greatly reduces the risk of STDs and that over half the men who are "mutilated" as adults report a greater satisfaction of sex after the surgery heals?

      When I was stationed in Thailand in the USAF, one of my buddies got jungle rot on his foreskin, and the treatment was "mutilation". Poor guy had to carry around amyl nitrate "poppers" for six weeks until it healed in case he got an erection.

      I was glad I'd been "mutilated" at birth when there's no pain and no stitches and little blood so there was no risk of jungle rot on my dick.

      Admit it, you hate circumcision because the Jewish and Muslim religions demand it (I am neither), and you hate religion. You probably consider religion itself to be barbaric and uncivilized. I'll tell you what, you make the choices you want for your own children and keep your nose out of everyone else's business.

    15. Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Windows ME...was not a TOILET effort.
      Windows ME...was SHIT

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  4. KISS Principle by EnempE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of these things seem rather complicated and use materials that aren't easy to obtain.

    To provide greater benefit the machine should be able to be manufactured without specialized tools and be able to be built with universally available, preferably recyclable or re-purposed materials. If people can make a living out of making and servicing these toilets then the sanitary and economic (from the created industry) benefit will spread quickly and independently without requiring the oversight of a foreign NGO.

    1. Re:KISS Principle by davester666 · · Score: 2

      They just use a small amount of enriched uranium to aid in tracking where each unit is at all times. Geiger counters are cheaper than RFID readers and more reliable.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:KISS Principle by XrayJunkie · · Score: 1

      Thats right, but if you want more "advanced" products, you need advanced production systems.
      There are some products that realize a good idea, but look around: new, better products come along with high-tech and feature rich functionality often realized by new materials, more software, state-of-the-art electronics and so on. And that is what brings an economy forward. Examples: Direct Manufactoring (http://dmrc.uni-paderborn.de/en/about-dmrc/?cHash=3be59309b4fe2e5a416267b052bcf74f), Molded interconnect devices (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molded_interconnect_device).

      There are so many research initiatives (at least in germany) to push intelligent systems (buzzword: cyber physical systems) forward.

    3. Re:KISS Principle by westlake · · Score: 1

      If people can make a living out of making and servicing these toilets then the sanitary and economic (from the created industry) benefit will spread quickly and independently without requiring the oversight of a foreign NGO.

      This is the same argument Negroponte made for the OLPC laptop.

      1.84 million distributed.

      24,000 to Asia.

      360,000 to Uruguay

      870,000 to Peru.

      One Laptop per Child

    4. Re:KISS Principle by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later, more and more "advanced" products that depend on advanced production systems will eventually lead to a "technology crash." Consider that up until the semiconductor era, most manufactured devices could be replicated, customized, modified, and even produced in small quantities by an experienced, knowledgeable, and determined hobbyist working out of his garage. Even more complicated manufactured goods could still be completely fabricated by a relatively small group of workers operating from a single location. Granted, a majority of raw materials has never been universally available in any particular location in the world, but ever since the industrial revolution the availability of scrap material made it possible for an individual hobbyist or small group of workers to build just about anything imaginable, with only the scale of the product being a limiting factor (for instance, heavy-cargo ship building requires more workers and materials than what might be available in a small town, and same can be said for mass-production of any product).

      But most of the "high tech" products of our modern time depend on semiconductor materials and the massive infrastructure, logistics, and manpower to produce these materials and configure them for their final application. Once in the hands of a hobbyist or developer, there is no limit to what products can be produced from semiconductor devices such as transistors, integrated circuits, microprocessors, FPGAs, and so on. But the hobbyist cannot produce these components "from scratch". If necessary it is possible to build your own resistors, inductors, capacitors, transformers, etc. There are hobbyists today who continue to practice the ancient arts of blacksmithing and glassblowing, but the exotic and dangerous chemicals, as well as the very precise and high-energy equipment required to produce even a basic integrated circuit is way beyond what is doable on the local level. And unlike metal or glass, semiconductors do not tend to hold up well in a scrapyard environment, and most semiconductor products are too specific to be easily adapted for alternative purposes.

      So a horrendous global economic event, wide-scale natural disaster, severe energy shortages, or world war that leads to the closure of semiconductor foundries could make much of the products we use on daily basis virtually unrepairable and replaceable. As for the developing world, especially in Africa, which still lacks much of the heavy infrastructure available in Asia, Europe, and the Americas, the focus should be on developing "appropriate technology" that allows the local population to grow economically without being entirely dependent on a constant flow of high-tech imports. Because of the lack of wealth in many parts of African nations, relying on imported products that must be maintained with imported parts and often imported expertise, this approach is simply not sustainable and leads to increasing debt, which is already a major obstacle for most of the developing countries in Africa. Bringing tools and technology to the local populations that allow them to develop their own internal local expertise, and their own systems for distribution and service, and the independence to locally produce and maintain their own tools, up to and including developing their own improvements to these tools and technologies may be the best way for these areas to develop. I'm not saying deprive them of computing power or specialized tools, but the "gizmos" they need to use on an everyday basis should be easily user-serviceable with locally available materials. The complexity of the devices may be able to increase as the infrastructure, technological savvy, and wealth of the local population improves over time.

      I believe that people in developed nations would also do well to possess and be familiar with tools and technology that are not entirely dependent on semiconductors and other advanced technology for some of the same reasons I have already mentioned. The dependence on semiconductors is p

  5. Crucial by BoydWaters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who thinks this is a silly idea needs to spend two weeks in a city without modern plumbing.

    1. Re:Crucial by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

      Yep.. they go out on Friday and are collected on Sunday, dead handy for the Friday night party crowd and much better than having desperate and partied-out people pissing in doorways.

      Behind those doorways is a city with sufficient toilets backed by a infrastructure that, although aging, still works and is being improved.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  6. Must be missing something... by GumphMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why reinvent the toilet when we already have perfectly functional, no-energy (or very low energy) composting toilet and urine diversion options? What is it about these options that does not meet the criteria?

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    1. Re:Must be missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why reinvent the toilet when we already have perfectly functional, no-energy (or very low energy) composting toilet and urine diversion options? What is it about these options that does not meet the criteria?

      Somebody influential won't make a profit.

    2. Re:Must be missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean somebody effluential won't make a profit

    3. Re:Must be missing something... by CoopersPale · · Score: 1

      Was going to say the same thing - these don't sound like viable options for low tech third world situations.

    4. Re:Must be missing something... by dmomo · · Score: 1

      Who influential stands to make a profit from this? Not Bill Gates. So who are you talking about?

    5. Re:Must be missing something... by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      High population density. I doubt that standard composting toilets continue to be sufficient when your population moves into 4-story, close together apartment buildings.

    6. Re:Must be missing something... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      Come up with a toilet alternative that doesn't need plumbed water, a sewer system, electricity and will cost 5 cents or less per user daily to build and maintain.

      This are the requirements, and the toilet you mention seems to fulfill them easily. The main objection may be capacity, as composting is a fairly slow process so you need a relatively large volume, especially when there are many users using it for their daily needs, and not a remote-highway-stop type of service.

      Actually solutions mentioned in the article include microwaves, mechanical rollers and other powered parts. This needs electricity. The cost is also going to be an issue, though the microwaves produce CO and H2 and the system may be able to produce its own energy that way.

      The proposed solutions also sound really high-tech at first glance. Not suitable for the application, imho. It should be easy to maintain, and low-maintenance, with easy to obtain parts.

    7. Re:Must be missing something... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The same way they do this now. With the difference that then they have something like a toilet to begin with.

    8. Re:Must be missing something... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      5cents or less is easy - if you don't count any cost for work hours for maintaining. if you do then moving the shit around becomes pretty expensive.

      actually the real problems rise probably from it having to be practical in a high density african ghetto.

      I for one hate wood wc's.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Must be missing something... by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      Who influential stands to make a profit from this? Not Bill Gates. So who are you talking about?

      Err.. well, definately "Not Bill Gates".. He made his money through software monopolies not sewage monopolies, so I guess they are talking about, you know, other people.. ie the ones who want to maintain their monopoly on the provision of sewage infrastructure. In this case Bill is behaving as a good guy and deserves credit.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    10. Re:Must be missing something... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It specifically states "to build and maintain" so maintenance is included. Disposal of the waste presumably not, though.

    11. Re:Must be missing something... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I notice that "doesn't smell horrible and attract flies" is not one of the requirements. One of the reasons we use water in our toilets is to use it to block the trap so that smells don't come up. The waterless urinals (which I think are great) work because they replace the water with a fluid that floats on top of the urine. You still need the sewer system... you just don't need the water supply.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:Must be missing something... by jakedata · · Score: 2

      I own several composting toilets. I am looking forward to something far better.

      If you want to "flush" to the composting location then you need an ultra-low water head. This is problematic for many reasons. If you don't want a flush then you need to rely on gravity and need a vent fan to keep the bad air out of the house. This is problematic too.

      If the compost gets too dry, the process slows, and you end up with fungus that attracts fungus flies. If the compost gets too wet, well ewww.... you have to clean out the system before it overflows.

      In winter the compost may not generate enough heat to keep the system from freezing. More ewww...

      It is especially difficult to run a system with guests. Imagine spending 10 minutes explaining how to use the toilet. What can go in, what can't, how to flush, what is that stuff down there...

    13. Re:Must be missing something... by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      It is especially difficult to run a system with guests. Imagine spending 10 minutes explaining how to use the toilet. What can go in, what can't, how to flush, what is that stuff down there...

      You still get guests? Wow :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    14. Re:Must be missing something... by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      Thanks for answering the question from a point of knowledge. Some of these are less likely to be an issue in tropical Kenya where 'winter' low temperatures are above 13 Celsius (55F). Any toilet system is going to require some maintenance though, just as western flush toilets do (it is just removed from sight). When your options are no sanitation, and some sanitation that requires a bit of effort, perhaps the impediments are not so great.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    15. Re:Must be missing something... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I think the smell issue may be implied as has to be solved too.

      And those existing waterless urinals then still need some kind of liquid (I guess an oil), so won't be suitable for this use. It all indicates how hard the problem really is, and why no-one yet has found a good solution.

  7. This is too obvious surely... by Kained · · Score: 1

    Another way to make money out of a piece of crap! ;)

  8. Well... by Literaphile · · Score: 1

    His career is sure going into the crapper.

  9. The hate by santax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Long time linux lover here. Long time hater of MS policy and business practice. However, this man, who was once the richest man in the world has in the latest 15 years of his life great things for humanity. Things that actually make a different for people. I don't care how much you hate windows or Gates as the former president of that company, but surely you can't be against him spending so much of his fortune (and sure, he has enough money to have a comfortable life even with doing this) to make lifes better... Give the guy a break on this part. He has spend a fortune on his foundation and did so with many great projects that actually got shit done. (no phun intended)

    1. Re:The hate by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, Ellison builds boats.

    2. Re:The hate by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I'm reading you correctly, you'd rather see him widen the wealth gap between the U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world ? The funny thing about wealth gaps is they tend to trigger acts of extreme violence to rebalance the equation. It is FAR more beneficial to humankind, to help the 3rd world deal with some of their most basic problems. Who's to say, maybe in 30 years from now, an African that was given access to education, sanitation and employment might discover a (realistic) cure for AIDS.

      I'd go as far as saying that there is not much hope left for the U.S., because its control structures are far beyond repair, its human capital bottlenecked by the very pursuit of wealth. Throwing more money into a broken hyperpower only makes the rich richer. Throwing money into a 3rd world nation has the potential to bring sweeping changes.

      Ultimately, it's about inching toward a unified world view. To think or act otherwise is notihng more than racism and elitism.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    3. Re:The hate by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Multiple issues with this:
      1) motivation: his wife is doing this to improve his image. So, he is simply following what other industrial criminals did. So, no, I am not that impressed.
      2) a number of his attempts are insane. For starters, he wants to wipe out a species of mosquitoes. Yet, it is finally becoming apparent in science that virus give us our leaps in evolution. As such, mosquitoes transmit these virus.; wanting to stop hurricanes in the atlantic due to economic issues. All the while he ignores that the hurricanes serves as a pump to bring up nutrients from much lower in the oceans to the surface.
      3) for all his spending of money, it has been tied back to MS.
      4) he is a huge drain on the western economy and IP. even now he is looking to take american nuke tech and transfer to china.
      5) the man misses doing any real things: building up space infrastructure; building up maglev or other high-speed rail in America.
      Sorry, but not impressed by him.

      I'm not Bills biggest fan, but I am impressed by his projects. With respect to
      1) Even Scrooge was only converted late in life
      2) mosquitoes are the worlds biggest people killer. Obviously some approaches to solving the problem have issues. Malaria has been around for ages and all it seems to have given some people is sickle cells
      3) his money has to come from somewhere
      4) Bill was not really the patent troll that Microsoft seems to becoming. I don't think that Microsoft was really active in the patents field whilst he was in charge.
      5) is more Paul Allens field, so maybe he's ensuring that between the two of them they give wide coverage. All the high tech projects do not really benefit the worlds poor, and can be funded in other ways, so why should he do it.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    4. Re:The hate by operagost · · Score: 2

      U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world

      Why are we focusing on the USA?

      I'd go as far as saying that there is not much hope left for the U.S., because its control structures are far beyond repair, its human capital bottlenecked by the very pursuit of wealth.

      Oh, I see. Maybe it's because there is no free market, just crony capitalism?

      Ultimately, it's about inching toward a unified world view. To think or act otherwise is notihng more than racism and elitism.

      Ad hominems are no substitute for hard data.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:The hate by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So you don't have a point, you're just upset with who you assume Bill Gates to be, regardless of how accurately your idea resembles the real-life Bill Gates. Muppet.

    6. Re:The hate by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If I'm reading you correctly, you'd rather see him widen the wealth gap between the U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world ? The funny thing about wealth gaps is they tend to trigger acts of extreme violence to rebalance the equation.

      Not necessarily. Many of the modern acts of terrorism are by people relatively well off with time on their hands. When was the last time a poor, African country threatened the security of the United States?

    7. Re:The hate by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      So some does what is determined to be illegal and predatory business; to effective levy an economic rent on you and me. He then pretty well buys off the justice system so the prosecution settles for him paying his debt to society largely with more copies of his own shovelware given to schools and government, that costs him next to nothing to produce and actually if anything further secure his companies dominant position.

      He becomes amazingly rich at least partly at the expense of everyone who has ever gone near PC here in the states, but its okay because he is now giving it away?

      If I stole your car but gave it to charity later would you be alright with it? Is it the fact that he spread it out more that makes it okay? Lift a few hundred from one and its serious crime but nick a penny from 300,000 and that's cool?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:The hate by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Gates was talked into being a philanthropist by his father -- an IBM lawyer. My thought is it's just PR. It isn't like he can't afford it or something.

      Me, I have far more respect for the waitress who throws a ten dollar bill in the Salvation Army bucket. That ten bucks actually means something to her, what Gates spends doesn't affect his life or lifestyle at all.

    9. Re:The hate by doesnothingwell · · Score: 1
      Computer industry in the crapper and all I got was a new itoilet. The man was, is, and always will be a greedy turd. Bill Gates 2.0 didn't build the american computer industry he raped it for a profit and then sold it for his new life. I want the hours of my life back for all those install codes and failed WGA checks.

      I earned this hate, I'd like to punch him in the nose.

      --
      They can have my command prompt when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    10. Re:The hate by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Sooo.... can I invoke Godwin's law here ?

      What I'm saying is that refusing to help those in need and abroad, in favour of concentrating wealth and power locally, is akin to racism. It's not an attack, it's a statement. I really don't see how that has anything to do with Bu$hitler. They planted racist ideologies to further their grossly tyrannical agendas. That's the opposite of what I'm saying.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  10. Re:The shills Re:The hate by santax · · Score: 2

    I don't think you understand me. Not trying to speak up for MS at all. Speaking up for a guy who changed lives. On the pc - for the worst. In Afrika - for the better. And next time, show some balls. Use your account.

  11. The frictionless toilet bowl... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    ... please Uncle Bill, hear our desperate plea. Save us from the brown streaks.

  12. Does It Clean Your Asshole? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been pondering this recently. Here in the USA we tend to feel pretty holier-than-though, but for the most part we have pretty dirty assholes. I mean, poo touched that and we just wipe it off with some paper. If poo touched your hand, would you be content to wipe it off with paper? So why do we tolerate it with our assholes?

    I'd love to see some demographics on countries sorted by asshole cleanliness. I'm guessing that just like education and health care, the USA would be solidly in the middle of the pack. I suspect that Japan probably would have the most-clean assholes in the world, just based on their high end toilet technology. I'm not sure I want to speculate on the dirty end of the scale so as not to risk diplomatic incident.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If poo touched your hand, would you be content to wipe it off with paper? So why do we tolerate it with our assholes?

      Perhaps it is because you tend to not pick up food with your asshole and then put it in your mouth, or (and more likely imho) because we can't smell it.

    2. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I recommend the arse cleaning hoses found in Malaysia. They don't have the size or expense of a seperate bidet and they're not resident in the unhygenic toilet pot like Japanese integrated bidets. You just lift it off its hook on the wall, point the spray nozzle at your butthole, twist the tap and bam, no more shit on your o-ring. But either way, the European bidet has existed for a century now, there's always been that option at home, the Malaysian hose is the only option small, cheap and simple enough for institutional toilets.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    3. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see some demographics on countries sorted by asshole cleanliness.

      Google for the magazine "Viz and "The Bottom Inspectors" . . . the Office of Bottom Inspectors are responsible for this in the UK:

      if your bottom is pimpled
      or flabby and dimpled
      if your cleft hair is not winnet free
      if inadequate wiping
      has caused gusset striping
      then your bottom belongs to me
      your bottom belongs to me

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by exa · · Score: 2

      Dude, you have a funny way of putting this hygiene problem so I'll answer :) This happens to be a problem that I've thought about sporadically!

      In our country, Turkey, we use both toilet paper and water to clean our assholes. Because traditionally, in the ala turca toilet they used water. So we ended up adding a small water pipe to the ala franca closet.

      But I have never seen a Japanese toilet. Is it possible that they use a water jet, and then a robotic asshole cleaning wipe with nanotech disinfectants, a laser to kill germs, and then a warm air jet which dries the said area, with complimentary cream on demand?

      --
      --exa--
    5. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by ChinggisK · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bah, you think the RIAA is bad, just you wait until Big Toilet Paper has its business model threatened by modern technology...

    6. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Search for 'Washlet Syndrome'. There is a price to pay for everything, including being extra clean.

    7. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't touch my food with my asshole.

      Nor do I touch door handles and other things that other people will touch with my asshole.

      Nor do I "shake assholes" with people.

    8. Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? by ffflala · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered why a brief post-dump shower isn't as common a part of US cultural bathroom habits as post-dump hand washing is. Residential bathrooms usually have both a toilet and a shower already, so for most situations this would simply involve an adjustment of one's bathroom habits: no additional equipment required. A hand-held shower nozzle can speed things up, but isn't necessary.

  13. I love Bill Gates by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    Hey, Slashdot poster: I love Bill Gates: I just wish people would stop taking the piss out of him.

  14. This is highly overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, we can separate this into 2 different camps: developed vs. undeveloped.
    In the developed world, we have plumbing throughout, so the flush sends it to a central area. Now, how useful is that? 2 words: Joules Biotech. They are using genetically modified cyanobacteria, to kick out ethanol and diesel fuel. So, why is this special? Because this uses our sewage as feedstock. IOW, it turns crap into fuel. OTOH, the ideas being pushed here, require loads of energy to try and get rid of crap.

    Then you have the undeveloped world. Basically, we are talking, no plumbing. So, what matters most to them? Soap and a water bowl. Yes. For the vast majority of the world, they use their left hand to wipe their ass(which is why you do not use your left hand in nearly all parts of the world). We could help the undeveloped world by simply getting them resources such as soap to kill the bacteria that are on their hands, esp. the left one. For those of you that think that this is funny, keep in mind that the single highest killer of babies in 3rd world nations is diarrhea. Much of that is from the parents or siblings having dirty hands.

  15. Tree Bog by pfafrich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Best and simpest idea for a toilet I've seen is the tree bog. Its a raised platform over an enclosure space fenced off with chicken wire. Around the bog you plant willow or other greedy trees which rapidly consume the nutrients, effectively turning the poo into biomass. Aerobic decomposition has advantages over anaerobic decomposition and there is no smell if you use a layer of sawdust. The whole thing requires no maintenance as the poo decomposes very quickly. Not good for urban situations but ideal in rural environments.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    1. Re:Tree Bog by pfafrich · · Score: 1

      Article on tree bogs for anyone interested.

      --
      There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
  16. Re:How about fresh clean water instead?? by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    The reinvented toilet can be part of the solution to that problem.

  17. Re:Bill Gates is way better than Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs is dead. Kind of hard to retire and help people when he's dead.

    Who knows what he would have done if he had lived longer, though. My personal belief is that he wouldn't have done as much as Gates though because Gates is the man at charity.

    Regardless, parent is a troll.

  18. Salt Water? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 2

    The whole idea behind these toilets is that water is scarce and the region is poor -- that's only half-true. If you want to get down to serious, cheap answers, fund plumbing of salt water in from the ocean -- it won't be useful for drinking without some prior preparation, but the toilets, if properly made, need not be an advanced technology to function. Plus if one goes through the trouble of piping in sea water, perhaps it would open up more inland areas to the possibility of desalination plants? The demand would be limited to simply drinking water and bathing, since the toilets would be "first priority" and not need to have a constant source of fresh water like the former two. The only issue I could really see here is a requirement for redundant plumbing, in areas where having too much plumbing must seem like...well, a pipe dream.

    1. Re:Salt Water? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did find this little gem.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_in_Hong_Kong#Seawater_flushing

      "In 1960 legislation was introduced to promote seawater flushing on a larger scale, followed by substantial investments in a separate network although the system was unpopular due to the need to build a separate plumbing network in each house. Seawater initially was sold, but from 1972 on it was provided for free and the costs of the system were recovered through the drinking water tariff. In 1991, about 65% of Hong Kong's households used seawater for flushing. By 1999, this percentage had increased to 79%"

    2. Re:Salt Water? by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

      One advantage here is that, whereas in Hong Kong, an entire new network had to be developed under an older one, in areas with no substantial plumbing, the entire process could be done in one shot.

    3. Re:Salt Water? by dargaud · · Score: 2
      At the coastal antarctic station where I worked we had a complex water pipe system between the dessalination plant and the station built as such: drinking water pipe inside a sea-water pipe going one way inside a sea-water pipe going the other way inside a thick layer of insulation.

      The reason for the two-way seawater was to continuously recirculate it to avoid freezing. And since sea-water is less prone to freezing than clear water, it was also a bonus. It wasn't actually sea-water but the even saltier (and warmer) remains from the dessalination process. And it was used for flushing.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    4. Re:Salt Water? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      having too much plumbing must seem like...well, a pipe dream.

      I see what you did there.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  19. Re:Bill Gates is way better than Steve Jobs by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    I duckduckgo'd the subject a bit and it appears that Tim Cook has set a mini philanthropy program where if an Apple employee donates something to a non-profit organization, Apple pays the bill. :)

  20. Make the plumbing out of sunlight and sand. by An+dochasac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Markus Kayser's solar sintering 3D printer shows what is possible when you use ingenuity, technology and two abundant desert resources, sunlight and sand. Mr. Kayser says he is already working with Kohler on the possibility of using solar powered, sand fed replicators like his to make sanitation products such as toilets and plumbing.

  21. It's actually a secret plan.... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    They are desperate to find some way to recycle the brown Zunes.

    -- Terry

  22. Folks, you gotta think outside the box here... by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    What people really want is a toilet that shits for them! You know, to take all the strain out of the experience and make it a more relaxing affair. First the system would set you at ease and then... assist. For sure, it would make hemorrhoids a thing of the past.

  23. Common Microsoft Fascination? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    Years ago it was the iLoo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILoo) I wonder what Microsoft's fascination is with crap?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  24. don't laugh: toilets are important by przemekklosowski · · Score: 2

    Some of my Scout parent friends are military doctors and they told me that better field latrines were a measurable factor in WWII. All armies had established procedures for setting them up, and the fastidius Germans did a solid job of it, if you pardon the pun---but the Americans added an additional step of covering the latrine box with a burlap sack as a fly barrier. The flies are a major disease vector, and as a result American troops were healthier and more combat ready.

  25. Re:Bill Gates is way better than Steve Jobs by Pope · · Score: 1, Informative

    Stupid fucking troll.

    Bill Gates retired as CEO of Microsoft to go run his charity. Steve Jobs was CEO of Apple almost up to the end.

    Guess you've never bothered to see what countries Microsoft's hardware is made in, huh?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  26. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs; was Re:The hate by przemekklosowski · · Score: 1

    Similar sentiments here---and a sad comparison with Steve Jobs who as far as I can tell didn't do much charitable giving, and apparently was quite good at finding tax loopholes so he didn't pay much in taxes either.

    1. Re:Bill Gates and Steve Jobs; was Re:The hate by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Steve also thought that license plates were for the little people and that all those blue parking spots were the peons paying homage to their God Steve with really good parking.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  27. Does the new toilet involve three seashells? by rtobyr · · Score: 1

    I have always wanted to know how to use the three shells.

  28. ReCycle by scafuz · · Score: 1

    why don't they find a way to turn thrown chair into energy?

  29. What an Unfortunate Choice of Metaphor by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article says Gate's toilet efforts have "born fruit".

    Yeuagh!

    Were these fruit "Dingleberries"?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  30. This is what I came here to say by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Many kinds of composting toilet exist, you have to get slightly fancier for those intended for use in the city, but it's no big deal.

    For those in the country, if you need one with more capacity, you just make the vault taller, so that's easy as can be.

    For those WAY out in the country, you can dig holes and shit in them via an outhouse, then plant trees in the holes when they're about full. Plant a food tree; it won't start producing in less than a year anyway, and your crap will be dirt by then.

    Cities can continue to use their existing toilets and still have waste composting, if we use AIWPS to close the loop. Short form, sewage becomes algae, methane, and clean water. Everybody wins.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. Anyone up for a game of Angry Turds? by jakedata · · Score: 1

    ...it would be like the "iPad of sanitation," he said.

    There's an app for that.

  32. Embrace and Extend by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    I suppose it might be useful for log dumps...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  33. Twitter from the Shitter? by polyp2000 · · Score: 2

    I guess you might be able to "Share" your lavatory adventures too.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  34. Photoshop fail by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

    I pulled up the article, started reading, that picture was NOT originally of Bill Gates.

  35. By the time I read the EULA... by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    .. I won't need to use the toilet.

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  36. time for a change of terms? by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Up till now we've always taken a crap because of Thomas Crapper , the man often mistaken as the inventor of the toilet.


    Does this mean we should now say, "I got to go take a Gates?"

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  37. Already done. by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    We already have sanitary, non-energy consuming, non-water consuming toilets that recycle the human output to good useable soil amendments. Gates is just trying to buy back his soul by claiming advancements to things that are already better than he'll conceive.

  38. Create a reputation, live with it. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    We in Latin America are very familiar with this behaviour.

    People that got the upper hand in business by all kind of dubious means start all kind of charitable work and sponsoring of the arts.

    It is called a PR exercise.

    One can't deny that these exercises can have benefits, sometimes immense ones, but they can't rewrite history or palliate the pain and anger of the people who suffered previous bad behaviour.

    What would impress me is if Bill would use his quite reasonable leverage to undo some of the damage his company did, for example stopping Microsoft patent trolling expeditions, bribing the necessary politicians with the respective campaign donations in order to change the idiotic copyright and patent systems in favour of the general public, or some other gesture saying "mea culpa".

    As it is, to all those who remember the other BIll, it is too much to ask to forgive (which I can) and forget (which I can't).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  39. Windows is craptastic.... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

    ....a sh*t OS, processing sh*t code, running on sh*t hardware....

    yeah, that about sums it up.

    --
    There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.