Slashdot Mirror


Submitting "Nuking the Fridge" To Scientific Peer Review

An anonymous reader writes "George Lucas claims there was 'a 50/50 chance' Indiana Jones could survive the atomic blast in Legend of the Crystal Skull by hiding inside a refrigerator. Dr. David Shechner subjects this claim to rigorous peer review, and his findings are not good news for people looking to hide from nukes in appliances."

78 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. "Rigorous peer review" by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Glad I'm not one of Dr. David Shechner's peers, then. Although from the sound of things he must not have many left!

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Starteck81 · · Score: 2

      Glad I'm not one of Dr. David Shechner's peers, then. Although from the sound of things he must not have many left!

      At least not any smart ones!

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    2. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Imrik · · Score: 2

      His peers have interns/grad students.... err had anyway.

    3. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by jackbird · · Score: 4, Informative

      You forgot to include the actual paper, although your comment also appears to state that you haven't actually read it. It's chock-full of bad puns.

    4. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by silverspell · · Score: 5, Funny

      The paper ignores other sci-fi contructs like wormholes and hyperspace, which are considered Bantha poodoo.

      By whom? Many of the top minds in astrophysics consider those areas of research to be entirely valid.

      "We have top minds working on it now."

      "Who?"

      "Top. Minds."

    5. Re:"Rigorous peer review" by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      <pedant>The quote was with "top men", not "top minds"</pedant>

  2. What this really means by Manuka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that he denied the Mythbusters a chance to go nuclear.

    1. Re:What this really means by Manuka · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure they can find some small pacific atoll that nobody wants anymore. Maybe do it in conjunction with Shark Week. Maybe you can jump sharks AND hide in fridges all at once.

    2. Re:What this really means by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tonight on Mythbusters... Can you survive while swimming with a shark in a fridge full of water, during a nuclear blast?

      Depends...does the shark have laser beams attached to its head?

  3. Trauma by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forget the radiation and heat. The trauma from the g-forces of that flight and landing would have killed anyone easily.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Trauma by thereitis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And let's not forget we're talking about "surviving" afterward - that could mean living the rest of your life in an ICU. Indiana Jones not only survived but kicked some serious ass the same day.

    2. Re:Trauma by mrmeval · · Score: 2

      Indiana Jones is immortal

      Harrison Ford is just OLD

      Dammit, I was hoping to see a few dozen more movies by him.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    3. Re:Trauma by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Indiana Jones was only immortal while he was in that temple. In the Young Indiana Jones serial in the '80s, he was depicted with...OMG I'm such a dork.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:Trauma by snowgirl · · Score: 2

      I think Indiana Jones was only immortal while he was in that temple.

      Indeed, as the Grail Knight specifically says that the immortality the cup grants lasts only within the temple. And further if you examine the... OMG, I'm such a dork, too.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    5. Re:Trauma by mrmeval · · Score: 2

      I actually meant immortal on our side of the 4th wall. If they ever kill him in a story there will be a lingering doubt that he will stay dead. If the IP holders were to in some way convince people they kill him off in a story the IP holders won't be able to wallow in the Indiana Jones Money Tub anymore. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  4. George Lucas. by Chas · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only thing George is an expert on is MOICHANDISING!

    But, if you're about to suffer the effects of a close range nuclear detonation, you could do worse... At least this way you'll feel proactive about avoid death as you die horribly.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:George Lucas. by bronney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't run from a nuclelar detonation, you'll die tired.

    2. Re:George Lucas. by BeefMcHuge · · Score: 2

      Actually he was referring to Spaceballs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvmZ9SPcTzU

  5. Then let's test these next by davidbrit2 · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Ripping out a man's heart without killing him.
    2. Jumping from a plane using an air raft.
    3. Keeping an immortal knight in a subterranean cavern for thousands of years.

    Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

    1. Re:Then let's test these next by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Ripping out a man's heart without killing him.
      2. Jumping from a plane using an air raft.
      3. Keeping an immortal knight in a subterranean cavern for thousands of years.

      Or, how about just shut up and watch the movie.

      Mythbusters already busted that middle one. I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

    2. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could do it in China... I'm sure they could come up with someone waiting to be executed whom they need to make a serious public spectacle out of (bonus points to the condemned if, when his heart is being pulled out of his chest, yells the Mandarin equivalent of "Freeeedommmmmm!!!gaaakkkgakkk")

    3. Re:Then let's test these next by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one,

      Not something you do successfully in your average weird cultist temple, but this is done in heart transplants all the time...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Then let's test these next by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disbelief can only be suspended so far. The first and third items on your list were attributed to supernatural events, and the second, while implausible, was nowhere near as insane as the nuked fridge stunt. Granted, suspension of disbelief is an entirely personal thing, but for me, the other three movies only pushed the boundaries of reality enough to be entertaining, whereas the fourth movie completely obliterated it.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    5. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ^This.

      I'm willing to suspend disbelief and pretend that magic is real... but there's no way that "physics as normal" allows the fridge stunt to work.

    6. Re:Then let's test these next by Alotau · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like to see them test the ripping out a man's heart one, though I'm not sure PETA will appreciate them testing on live animals.

      Simple, use politicians and lawyers. I think to be certain we need to try it on at least 10 thousand.

      Your subjects are flawed... one needs a heart in the first place to have it ripped out.

    7. Re:Then let's test these next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There, there.

    8. Re:Then let's test these next by icebraining · · Score: 2

      Well, a man is a living animal...

    9. Re:Then let's test these next by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "JAT stewardess Vesna Vulovi survived a fall of 33,000 feet (10,000 m)[7] on January 26, 1972 when she was aboard JAT Flight 367. The plane was brought down by explosives over Srbská Kamenice in the former Czechoslovakia (now Czech Republic)." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_fall

      Yes, not a rubber life raft, but it's not impossible to survive dropping out of the sky, just really freaking unlikely. Of course, that woman actually landed in part of the plane, broke her skull and was in a coma for 27 days. Probably not in a mood for serious ass kicking at that point, but she's no Indiana Jones either.

    10. Re:Then let's test these next by izomiac · · Score: 2

      Suspension of disbelief has limits. Movie writers seem to rely on mass ignorance to stretch these limits. Nobody would accept a car chase that suddenly goes airborne because everybody knows that cars can't fly under their own power. That said, some things can be accepted as a visually appealing metaphor, such as banging at the keyboard to hack a computer.

      Others, like being knocked out for half a day and actually waking up (and without brain damage no less), simply shows the writer knows nothing about the subject he's writing on. Once you realize the world doesn't follow the same laws as your own, and there is no predictable set of laws that it does follow, then most people lose interest. The semi-predictability is crucial. It's akin to the difference between a conversation and a random series of words. Or a protagonist which has 30 superpowers and solves every conflict by revealing a new one (deus ex machina).

    11. Re:Then let's test these next by Kozz · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... whereas the fourth movie completely obliterated it.

      Wait... there was a fourth movie?!

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    12. Re:Then let's test these next by similar_name · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using a life raft to survive a fall from an airplane: mythbusted

    13. Re:Then let's test these next by Xocet_00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, there wasn't.

    14. Re:Then let's test these next by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just go with "Yarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..."

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    15. Re:Then let's test these next by grahamd0 · · Score: 2

      Even at 25 mph, a head on collision is not something that you just jump up and say "I'm fine", especially when you're not wearing your seat belt.

      As a corroborating anecdote, I was once knocked unconscious riding in the back seat of car when it hit a telephone pole traveling ~30 mph, while wearing a seat belt.

      I have never been involved in a head-on collision at any speed, nor would I like to be.

    16. Re:Then let's test these next by Zibodiz · · Score: 2

      In order for it to be a plausible experiment, doesn't the subject need to have a heart to begin with?

    17. Re:Then let's test these next by Evtim · · Score: 4, Informative

      The second in the world-record list of "people falling from the sky" is more bizzare. I read it in the "book of general ignorance". The name was Alkemade and he served on a British bomber during WW2 (the name is Dutch though). He fell 6km if I remember correctly by himself (not sitting on the plain chair or something), landed hitting trees and finally snow, had a cigarette and walked away...

    18. Re:Then let's test these next by Dogbertius · · Score: 4, Funny

      http://xkcd.com/566/

      It was enjoyable at best, but I was still happy to see another movie in the series. Kind of like the joke in Big Bang Theory on an episode about seeing all 6 Star Wars movies in a movie marathon.

      "So, 1-3, then 4-6, or 4-6, 1-3, classic style?"

      "Isn't it obvious? 4-6 first. I prefer to be disappointed in the order in which George intended us to be."

    19. Re:Then let's test these next by snowgirl · · Score: 2
      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    20. Re:Then let's test these next by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      If you're willing to suspend disbelief on the basic premise of the movie (professor who kicks ass and finds magical artifacts, survives all sorts of danger and gets the girl... most of the time) the rest of it is just fun.

      Suspension of disbelief is a tricky thing, and I find that I (and I am certainly not unique in this regard) seem to be very picky and will happily accept some things while rejecting others.

      Anything to do with characters is bad: if a carachter acts in an inexplicable way all of a sudden, that tends to break the suspension.

      Magic, ark of the covenant, aliens, gods, comic-book stykle superheroes and supertech etc I can all accept. However, they have to be used in a way that we feel is consistent with the real world while we are watching the film.

      I am entirely happy to accept the Nazi-melting ark, and the holy grail with tricky caveats. The thing is that the characters are human and can only do things within their ability, or make use of some supernatural thing. The trouble with nuking the fridge scene is that the character is no longer bound by a set of self consistent rules. It's similar to (but less bad) to if the protagonist suddenly got the ability to fly to get out of a tricky situation.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    21. Re:Then let's test these next by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      He had a sprained ankle and got arrested, so no walking away. Still, falling 18000 feet and having no more than a sprained ankle so impressed the Germans that they gave him a certificate attesting to the fact and he was something of a celebrity in the POW camp.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Alkemade

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    22. Re:Then let's test these next by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Call it a cucumber :D

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    23. Re:Then let's test these next by TheLink · · Score: 2

      A few more here:
      http://www.greenharbor.com/fffolder/unlucky.html
      e.g.

      Tang Lee Ping Kuala Lumpur: In February of 2001 Tang Lee Ping of Malaysia fell 1,500 meters after her main and back-up parachutes failed to open. She woke up three hours later in a nearby hospital. Her injuries were minor (only bruises). She attributed her survival to God and a soft landing area.

      Bruises only! I think 1500 metres is enough distance to get to "normal" terminal velocity.
      And: http://www.greenharbor.com/fffolder/leeds.html

      I walked away without so much as a scratch. Following this incident I must have made over a hundred free falls and static line jumps without incident.

      --
    24. Re:Then let's test these next by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 2

      Feynman also demonstrated that the Challenger disaster might have been caused by faulty O-rings by dipping one into his ice-water, using a C-Clamp to test it.

      That, and it's "Zombie-Feynman" in the comic. Let's zombify you, and see if you don't lose some rigor. (mortis that is)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  6. This sounds like something made for TV.. by rykin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peer review? This is a job for the Mythbusters!
    Let's see, we have a fridge, now we just need a nuclear testing facility!

  7. Indie survived... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but the franchise didn't.

    Does that make him "Schrodinger's Archaeologist?"

    1. Re:Indie survived... by mykepredko · · Score: 2

      Uhhmmm... Apparently Lucas is working on the screenplay to #5.

      Indiana's death has been somewhat exaggerated...

      myke

  8. jamie want big boom by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't do this at home.

    1. Re:jamie want big boom by billcopc · · Score: 2

      Ever!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  9. Refrigerator is just a disguise by rush,overlord,rush! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually it's the TARDIS, and Indiana Jones is just another alias of Dr. Who. Of course he will survive.

    1. Re:Refrigerator is just a disguise by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2

      This is by far the most plausible explanation I've seen presented.

  10. Wrong subject by billcopc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, for one, wish they had peer reviewed THE SCREENPLAY.

    What a shit movie that was.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Wrong subject by Greystripe · · Score: 2

      All the movies except the last had a supernatural feel to them. Making it aliens and not something unexplainable prevents the imagination from attempting to fill in the explanation which leaves the viewer no sense of wonder. It would be like if someone made a Star Wars movie in which they explained what the Force was made from...

  11. Survival not so good for TFA website: by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ( ! ) Fatal error: Out of memory (allocated 15728640) (tried to allocate 19456 bytes) in /var/www/overthinkingit.com/wp-includes/class-http.php on line 1358

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  12. Google Cache by Chas · · Score: 3, Informative
    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  13. Back to basics by RandomAvatar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess it is back to hiding under a desk if we ever see a nuke coming.

  14. spoiler alert?!? by phaserbanks · · Score: 2

    Thanks for the spoiler, Slashdot.

    Am I the only one who hasn't watched this supposed piece of crap movie?

    1. Re:spoiler alert?!? by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spoiler alert? Really? The movie is 4 years old.

      While we're at it:
      They were the same guy.
      He was a ghost the whole time.
      The girl was a man
      Vader is Luke's father, and Leia is his sister.
      Rosebud is a sled.

    2. Re:spoiler alert?!? by retchdog · · Score: 2

      i thought rosebud was a brand of frozen peas.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    3. Re:spoiler alert?!? by Bieeanda · · Score: 2

      Filled with green peaness and country goodness, yeah.

  15. No Problem by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would be almost certain that Ford would survive a movie nuke in a prop refrigerator. Union rules specify that prop 1940s refrigerators weigh enough to require an entire crew to move. It was probably made of depleted uranium. As for the nuke, it was no more than 450 teraflops due to FX budget constraints. It takes at least an petaflop to kill an A-list movie star, and that is contractually stipulated.

  16. Fallout: New Vegas Peer Reviewed This Storyline by amanicdroid · · Score: 2

    Scientists aren't the only peer-reviewing group. Bethesda looked at the evidence presented and showed their judgement here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-iPC-IyZCY

  17. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    that's not unique. There were enough cases of that exact thing happening that they made a federal law requiring that any non-functioning fridge with a latching door must have the door REMOVED. Deep freezes included.

    Not only are they mostly airtight, they're also fairly soundproof. Makes them an effective deathtrap.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  18. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most home refrigerators do not have latches anymore.

  19. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Stewie241 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. And that was directly the result of a child watching an Indiana Jones movie. The idea of hiding in a fridge while playing hide and seek would never cross a child's mind had they not watched the movie.

  20. Re:Place your bets by Jeremi · · Score: 2

    Completely incorrect - but when did that ever get in the way of making a buck?

    I submit that there is a distance from ground zero at which chances of in-fridge survival are in fact 50/50. Computing the distance is left as an exercise for the fanboy.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  21. homage to the original back to the future script by retchdog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    in the original back to the future script, marty mcfly was sent "back to the future" in a refrigerator in one of the model houses at a nuclear test site. doc brown modded the fridge somehow so that the radiation would trigger the time circuits.

    the original script was very surreal, and a blatant social commentary on the failure/decay of the space age. for example, iirc, the time machine was powered by diet cola and marty is stranded because aspartame isn't invented until 1965.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  22. Re:Not peer review by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    One guy writing a "funny" article in which he is the third guy on a website to criticize some ideas and writes it sort-of in the style of a scientific peer review is not actually sending an idea around for scientific peer review. Headline and summary failure.

    You're new here, aren't you.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  23. Nuking the fridge= cool idea, badly executed by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 2

    Let me start by arguing that "realism" does in fact matter and that it is a key problem with this scene. Yes, a movie can ask you to suspend disbelief and watch improbable things-- but the degree of improbability needs to be established early on and it needs to be consistent. You can't suddenly up the ante and insert a sequence which belongs in a Road Runner cartoon.

    The scene could have been fixed, or at least improved. Instead of showing the fridge hurtling a hundred yards through the air (which of course would have reduced Indy to a pulp), they could have thrown it twenty feet and shown the walls of the house buckling (but not vaporizing) from the overpressure. And maybe had the mannequins catch fire, just to further establish the lethality of the blast. And they should have gotten rid of the cute little fucking CGI gopher.

  24. JFC by malelder · · Score: 2

    He had as much chance of surviving a nuke in a fridge as he did flying off a cliff in a heavily laden life raft into a river far below...its FUN you dummies, anyone remember laughter?

    --


    Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
  25. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Bogtha · · Score: 2

    The first drafts for Back to the Future had a fridge for a time machine, but it was changed to a car because they were worried about kids climbing into fridges.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  26. You forgot... by itsdapead · · Score: 2

    Clinging to the outside of a submarine while it travels halfway around the world...

    The fridge stunt was completely in keeping with the tongue-in-cheek tone of the Indy films - the film sucked because it was the much-delayed fourth film in a trilogy. When has that ever worked?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  27. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by u38cg · · Score: 2

    It happened often enough in the UK that safety videos were made about it. No links as I am at work, but it's easy enough to find on Youtube.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  28. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And this is not a fake news
    It happened, about 4 decades ago


    And do you know what has changed in the past four decades?

    Residential refrigerators don't latch. Haven't for 20-30 years, at least. They use a passive magnetic seal that even a kid could push open. Even standalone (residential) freezer units don't self-latch - They require a removable key-like knob to engage the lock, manually, from the outside (and even then, always have a safety release inside).


    Children watching the movie might just do what the hero does - hide inside a fridge, - and suffocate, just like that poor child who died 4 decades ago

    So really, you just want to advocate for Time Machine safety, rather than ranting against how many cases of the plague we could avoid by simply getting rid of the rats?

  29. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by Kincaidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, bullshit on that. Growing up, we hid in cupboards, under the kitchen sink, in the fridge, everywhere when playing hide and seek. My dad actually went through several plate glass windows in one game. You're severely underestimating the imagination of children, or you had a crappy childhood.

  30. Dunno by ledow · · Score: 2

    Dunno, but I heard of one poor sod that was caught within the Hiroshima bombings and, after being exposed, evacuated to Nagasaki just in time for...
    And that was a genuine, documented case from what I remember.

    Maybe people should watch "When The Wind Blows" more often and less Terminator. Nuke != instantaneous death. Really. It's a whole lot worse than that. In comparison to what happens to you after, it's probably better to go out in an instant flash of hot, burning death.

  31. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by mhajicek · · Score: 3, Funny

    More importantly, most home refrigerators do not have nukes anymore.

  32. Re:A child died, playing hide and seek by ae1294 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not only are they mostly airtight, they're also fairly soundproof. Makes them an effective deathtrap.

    I've added that to my list of ways to dispose of my enemies.. Your Secret Overlord thanks you. You will receive a box of chocolates at your work station soon. They most certainly do not contain Thallium and most certainly nothing radioactive... and completely 100% do not contain a combination of the two.

    Yours in Russia,
    P.

  33. I am the spirit of dark and lonely water by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    I remember those. Something along the lines of "...but to a small child it's a submarine, a castle, or a gipsy caravan".

    Unless it was nothing like that, in which case I clearly don't remember.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."