Slashdot Mirror


Women More Likely To Unfriend Than Men

Hugh Pickens writes "AFP reports that a study by the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project shows that women are more likely than men to delete friends from their online social networks like Facebook and tend to choose more restrictive privacy settings. Sixty-seven percent of women who maintain a social networking profile said they have deleted friends compared with 58 percent of men. The study also found that men are nearly twice as likely as women to have posted updates, comments, photos or videos that they later regret (PDF). 'Even as social media users become more active curators of their profile, a small group of what might be described as trigger-happy users say they post updates, comments, photos, or videos that they later regret sharing.'"

25 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing to see here by dugjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The study also found that men are nearly twice as likely as women to have posted updates, comments, photos or videos that they later regret " or "Men more impulsive than women" Hmmm. Big surprise there.

    --
    My brain is overly lubricated
    1. Re:Nothing to see here by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does this reflect higher concern re stalking (in the spectrum from the dangerous, life ruining/threatening kind to I don't want an old boyfriend to know about me)?
      Seems likely to me.
      I bet those of us worried about privacy in a big brother, what-can-future-employers-find-out-about-me way are more male than female, since that's probably correlated with higher computer literacy.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like "Women less regretful than men, more likely to blame others."

      That's possibly true. Socially women are seen as victims if people misuse or ogle their pictures, where as men are seen as "fair game". This would certainly encourage women to feel "poor me, I din nothing wrong its all these nasty people", whereas men would think "oh how could I have been so dumb".

  2. Still holding out. by philip.paradis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still don't have a Facebook account, and am no worse the wear for it. I have noted that of my family and friends who do have accounts, the ones who typically talk about their Facebook activity the most are definitely the women, and a lot of that talk seems to swing between gossip and outright vicious assaults. I'll just stay out of that mess, thanks.

    --
    Write failed: Broken pipe
    1. Re:Still holding out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Facebook is like most other technologies. You get out of it what you put into it.

      News at 11.

    2. Re:Still holding out. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Facebook is like most other technologies

      Facebook is a technology now? That is kind of like calling Slashdot a "technology."

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Still holding out. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which communication modalities aren't under the control of a monopolist?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC

      you're lucky if you have more than one ISP to choose from.

      Except that the Internet is not controlled by that one ISP, only your connection to it. No matter how you connect to Facebook, it is a communication system that is controlled entirely by one company. That is the difference here.

      Facebook is different in that the large interconnected user base is what creates the barrier to entry.

      No, the fact that Facebook has made no substantial effort at being interoperable with any other system is what creates a barrier to entry.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Still holding out. by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or a /. editor an editor.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. Nothing to see? Au contraire by retroworks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's gotta be more. E.g., Do the women really have more trouble with privacy settings - or does Facebook assume so because women inquire about the settings, whereas men won't stop and ask for directions (also explaining why more men fail to change settings to private)?

    --
    Gently reply
  4. The flipside of that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Women are more likely to friend people they'll end up unfriending later.

  5. I think it makes men more open and honest. by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're going to say something say it without caring who hears it or don't say anything at all.

    The above described phenomenon is akin to how women and girls whisper in each others ears, filters are like whispering. The unfriending I see as akin to what I watched a group of girls do in high school. There was about a dozen of them but only 11 could be friends at a time, there was always one girl kicked out of the circle, when she came back they chose another one to be mad at and kicked her out of the circle.

    My guess is the regret men have is regret over how a woman reacted to the picture or other content.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I think it makes men more open and honest. by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't this pretty much the only reason why men regret anything they say or do?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  6. Surprise, surprise... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...women are more selective than men regarding who to include in their social circle. I could've predicted this from real-world interactions. Women tend to form close-knit cliques. Men will hang with anyone who will get shitfaced drunk with them and commiserate about their problems with women, work, money, etc.

    1. Re:Surprise, surprise... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or women are less selective, and they add people without thinking about it, and then remove them later when it proves to be a bad idea. You can't tell which it is from the summary, anyway :p

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Social exclusion is a femal strategy by qualityassurancedept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Female's all over the animal kingdom use social exclusion instead of violence in order to punish other females. Exclusion is the primary competitive strategy for all sorts of female animals. Look it up on Wikipedia. Or google it. Its a widely known fact among researchers in the social science. That's how teenage girls bully each other.

    --
    if your life is such a big joke then why should I care?
    1. Re:Social exclusion is a femal strategy by jader3rd · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're that mad about it, just punish him by unfriending him and excluding him from your social circle.

    2. Re:Social exclusion is a femal strategy by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You didn't even notice that the subject line says "femal", huh?

      While I agree that proper grammar and spelling are something we should strive for, in a web discussion forum "it's the thought that counts". Isn't that the purpose of language -- to convey our thoughts?

      Dismissing someone who may have a worthwhile contribution to the discussion just because they misplaced an apostrophe (or misspelled a word) smacks of elitism. If we measure someone's value by the amount of useful information contributed to the discussion, you're more of a "fuckwit"... by at least an order of magnitude.

    3. Re:Social exclusion is a femal strategy by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...and never assume malice where incompetence will suffice. You'll get through life with a lot less conflict that way.

  8. Re:Nothing to see? Au contraire by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Judging from the differences of what gets posted on my wall, I find that men put up random cool things, pics from something they did with their friends etc while most of the really personal stuff I read such as struggles with life, relationships etc tend to be put up by women. I suspect the gender gap on the privacy settings are simply because woman care more about who reads what they put up.

  9. Who didn't know this by Murdoch5 · · Score: 3

    Women will unfriend someone for wearing the wrong shoes with a skirt, I think men have known this for years.

    1. Re:Who didn't know this by Skapare · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks. Glad to know this. I've always wondered why so few men wear skirts. Now I know.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  10. Contradictory observations by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My own experience with Facebook friends isn't nearly so clear-cut. My friends fall into one of four categories: People I know from childhood (school), people I know from work, people I know from church (conservative, evangelical) and people I know from a dialup BBS network in the 80s. Of those four groups, only the BBS nerds are an even mix of men and women; in the other three groups women dominate (heh) by a vast majority.

    And unlike the survey results mentioned in TFS, my female friends tend to be the ones to chatter about personal issues -- daily photos of children and grandchildren doing cute things, updates about their mood or health, etc. The men write about political issues, cars and other "guy toys", restaurants they like, hunting... and some of them only visit Facebook once a month or less.

    So the real news here is... your mileage may vary?

  11. Re:Discretion!! by icebraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember hearing someone say that if the services are free, YOU are the product.

    Yet, you're not paying for using Slashdot. What does that make you?

  12. Groucho by Wildplasser · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't want to be friends with people who have people like me as friends.

  13. That's because women are more emotionally hostile by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look at any social group of young teenage girls today. They're the most vile, wretched, undisciplined, emotionally hostile human beings that walk the face of the Earth today. They think nothing of torturing their peers emotionally to the point of suicide.

    Women want their enemies to suffer socially and emotionally.