T-Mobile Announces LTE Network
MrSeb writes "In a beautiful twist of fate, T-Mobile USA has announced that it will be launching an LTE network in 2013 using the money and AWS spectrum that it obtained from AT&T after its failed acquisition. According to T-Mobile, this upgrade comprises of a three-phase process: free up 2G spectrum, move HSPA+ to formerly 2G spectrum, and deploy LTE on formerly HSPA+ spectrum. The end result will be a much faster network that can compete with AT&T and Verizon, and download speeds of up to 74Mbps in 75% of the top 25 markets in the US. International visitors should enjoy better roaming thanks to the deployment of PCS HSPA+, too — and finally, an AT&T LTE iPhone would also work on T-Mobile's upcoming network."
I will visit the US this summer from Europe. Can anyone point me to a link where I can get some maps/explanations about roaming in the US?
I am horrendously confused about the US market and their current standards.
I will come with a N9 and an iPhone so I should be fine, but I'd like to be sure ahead of the time.
I didn't think iphone offered LTE or 4G. Maybe someday?
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
"75% of the top 25 markets" sounds like they mean there will be almost no coverage. A "market" could just mean a city, say the city centre. Assuming one enabled mast that could work out as about 18 square miles for the entire country.
Presumably their plans are a bit grander than that, but it still sounds like they are saying their network has terrible coverage and won't be getting any better.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
I like T-Mobile CS. But service in my home area is spotty at best and some of the places I go non existant. (One reason I like them is free Wi-Fi calling for home is awesome) But most of those places have good AT&T reception. Was almost hoping in a service way the deal went through but in CS way it didn't. I was hoping the failed deal would allow all T-Mobile access to AT&T in all area's, not just select few area's that AT&T/Tmobile agreements allow. (The one area I know of TMobile recept is fine but a deal exists. But in a few others Tmobile recept is terrible, AT&T is fine but no deal there). Oh well. I'll stick with them for now. See how it is when this stuff starts rolling out in 2013. Thing is since i'm 10 miles from Albany NY, i get 4g 5 miles from my house. Just wish they could add another tower in my area.
What's the point of offering speeds up to 74Mbps for a phone, when service providers give you ridiculously low data plans at an extravagantly high price... So we can rip through that low data plan faster than before?
If you can point to any other country that is even close in size and georgrpahy as the United States, that has a better land-line phone system, I would love for you to tell me about it. Bonus if they had all their rural homes hooked up 60 years ago like the US did.
it could also be that T-Mobile is not big enough to get a compatible God Phone so to do so, they are designing their upgrade path to result in not only a faster network but also one compatible with existing iPhone hardware.
LoB
"Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
Their corporate headquarters in is Factoria, just outside of Bellevue, Washington
It is pretty much impossible to get a signal in it's general area. The surrounding stores & restaurants are a dead zone.
If they build the network so you can actually get a signal, I will gladly leave AT&T for them.
Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yer?
See the løveli lakes
The wonderful telephøne system
And mani interesting furry animals
At least one of the US carriers finally is realizing that they have bandwidth. Dump 2G and use those frequencies for more advanced protocols. Too many of them keep their "largest coverage area" by keeping 2G going, instead of replacing it.
the tightfisted German owner (Deutsche Telekom) who was too cheap invest in 4G infrastructure or put down the money for the iPhone. As a result their market share kept dwindling.
Now that they have some money and that new pink dress wearing spokesperson (C.Zeta-Jones was getting too old) maybe they will do better.
It wasn't that stupid on AT&T's part, compensation for failed mergers are normal. Think of all the business T-Mobile due to FUD during the pending merger. There had to be something in the deal for T-Mobile to not get completely screwed when the merger failed or else they wouldn't have agreed to it.
We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
Yeah, like remember when he decreed that big universal healthcare plan and it was passed without any opposition or compromise? That was so awesome how he totally bypassed the entire legislative process to get exactly what he wanted.
We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
Oh, even Stalin had a health plan for the people (ours happens to be the "No Insurer Left Behind Act"), that didn't make him a nice guy. The real things Obama has accomplished however are much darker:
- Rendered the War Powers Act moot, so future presidents can decide on their own without any congressional interference when and where to go to war.
- Instituted a policy of due process free execution. This is death squad territory.
- Made the once radical policies of GWB, such as due process free detention, the NEW NORMAL.
- Excused torturers.
- Excused AT&T's illegal domestic wiretapping program.
- Attempted to undermine the treaty against cluster bombs even though we are not a signatory.
- Has applied the Espionage Act against whistleblowers of gov't malfeasance six times in three years. Before Obama, it had been applied three times in the entire history of the US.
- Drone bombing at a rate 14x that of GWB.
- Continues the racist drug war (for reference, see: The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness)
That's just off the top of my head ... oh yeah ... Tried to convince Iraq to let our forces stay beyond 12/2012. Funny thing about, I hear so many people give him credit -- they say things like, "he's president right? and the war ended right?" --- do people not understand that when a person puts up a fight for X, but fails to win X, it makes no sense to congratulate him for the end of X?" I guess not.
Anyway, Obama is just awful. Unless you are a neo-con, and then he's your wet dream of a president.
http://nothingchanged.org/
What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
pick up a plan+phone, or prepaid phone, from any provider you please, and use it to make actual calls - keeping your N9/iPhone around for chatting, internetting, etc. on e.g. WiFi networks
It surprises me that more domestic US users don't do the same thing.
Probably because they don't want to carry two devices and keep them both charged. Some men have a fear of carrying a bag on grounds that it might threaten their sense of heterosexuality. That's why they'll, say, hack their DS instead of buying a used Android phone to play homebrew on.
Android phone that I can't even sideload apps onto
To be fair: 1. AT&T issued an update several months ago that unblocked the "Unknown sources" checkbox in response to overwhelming customer demand for Amazon Appstore. 2. You can sideload with Android Debug Bridge on all devices with Android Market, and you could even when AT&T was still blocking "Unknown sources"
LTE is not real 4G either
Yeah, whenever I read "4G LTE" I read it as "4G Lite".
You surely must be kidding. You think bypassing the constitution is awesome???? You're obviously not happy with our great republic of the U.S. of A, so why not just renounce your citizenship and take up residence elsewhere -- like maybe North Korea or Communist China??
It was sarcasm jackass, because he didn't decree anything. Or did you somehow miss the drawn-out debate over the healthcare bill and the numerous concessions he made?
We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
Or did you somehow miss the backroom wheeling and dealing that took place to shove the bill through in direct opposition to the will of 70% of the population? So much for representative government.
Did you somehow miss the fact that backroom wheeling and dealing is exactly how our congress has operated for pretty much all of its existence? However passing a bill opposed by 70% of the population could be considered bad governance, but it is in no way dictatorship. Over 500 people cast a vote on that healthcare bill. They are free to vote against the wishes of their constituents, and their constituents are free to not reelect them. Out system does not work especially well, and I frequently disapprove of the outcome but it is almost entirely unlike a dictatorship.
We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
Tactics such as threats and intimidation sometimes do not allow one to be "free to vote against the wishes of their constituents," most unfortunately, and also unfortunately most constituents are not informed enough to know how to vote. Hence, the broken system of government.