Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Tests 'Safe' User Tag For Disasters

aesoteric writes "Facebook has embarked on a nationwide test of a new disaster message board for users across Japan. The feature allows users to mark themselves as being 'safe' in the event of a disaster. Doing so introduces a 'safe' insignia next to their name on their profile. The Facebook announcement appeared to be geoblocked."

8 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Like in the middle of a disaster people are going to start posting to facebook. Oh wait..

    1. Re:Lame by psnyder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Following the Fukushima quake, all phone networks were down to allow for emergency traffic only (I live in Tokyo). Internet was the only way to get a message out for a while. I sent a quick email to family who hadn't woken up in the states yet, because I was sure it would be on the news networks when they woke up.

      However, the following few days, people I barely knew or hadn't spoken to in ages, started coming out the woodwork, asking if I was okay. This feature is not a bad idea. It sure beats my mother plastering messages all over my wall, trying to tell people I'm okay.

    2. Re:Lame by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Funny

      except this is a problem - the people actually in the disaster often won't have access to FB, whereas the people nowhere near can happily say they are safe.

      Hey mom, I'm ok, I'm not under attack in Syria.

      (because I'm at home in the UK, with nothing more dangerous than thinking whether to have cheese or ham on my sandwich).

      There again, there's the after-effect problem... actually in a disaster, post "I'm safe" to FB, then look up to see the chunk of falling masonry .... somebody's going to sue FB for sure when that happens!

    3. Re:Lame by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here here! Very frequently, after a disaster, all the phone lines to the affected area are tied up with people either calling to announce they're safe, or calling people that might be in the area to see if they're safe. The official that shut down the phone network did exactly the right thing, because this is precisely at the same time as you really want the lines to be focused solely on 911 and other emergency traffic. It's absolutely human instinct to do anything in your power to ensure that your loved ones are safe, but it's counterproductive when there are huge numbers of people affected.

      So having something that would use far less bandwidth for "I'm OK" would solve a real problem. I'd actually recommend they make a little app that sends off something like a 100-byte message that would mark this on the website, so that users wouldn't have to browse to it. Even a false "I'm safe" followed by the person getting killed is actually an improvement, because the point of a tool like that is to prevent panic outside of the disaster area. The simple fact is that in a disaster, you or your loved one could well die very quickly, and there's absolutely nothing you can really do to prevent it. The best thing you can do inside the disaster zone is to aid the injured if you have the training, get out of Dodge, and/or help others get out of Dodge. The best thing you can do outside the disaster zone is stay as calm as possible, provide aid to any of the victims or rescuers that happen to show up, and otherwise get the heck out of the way and let the rescuers do their job.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  2. New Orleans by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets try to file a bug report using New Orleans as an example in haiku format in honor of this being rolled out first in Japan...

    Hurricane passes overhead
    District Nine clicks Safe
    Levees collapse; all drown; Whoops;

    haiku formatted bug reports are superior to free text, although I'm guessing I shouldn't quit my day job and become a professional poet...

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:New Orleans by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your command of words
      Is much like your sex appeal
      Lacking and awkward.

  3. Expiry time? by FunPika · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay so what if someone marks themselves as safe...then a few minutes later another earthquake hits and a roof falls on their head or something similar. Will the tag expire after a certain amount of time?

    --
    After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
  4. What happens when the disaster is over? by Dark$ide · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Facebook statuses (like married, in a relationship, etc) are sticky.

    What happens when the earthquake is done, the tsunami hasn't arrived yet and your status says "I'm safe".

    Next thing the tidal wave hits, wiping out your house, your phone line, your computer and the local cell phone mast, your status is still showing "I'm safe" when you're anything but safe.

    When will Facebook automagically reset your status to something neutral? Is that going to happen at midnight UTC, midnight PST or midnight local (JST if you're in Japan)? How is braindead Facebook going to handle that? (BTW my answer to that is badly.) How is Facebook going to work with daylight saving time (which may or may not be in effect)?

    I cancelled my Facebook membership on 9th Dec 2011 (because I got bored with all the changes they kept making and all the over commercialisation), I have to say I've not missed getting 20 new photos of my brother's cats posted everyday.

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.