Slashdot Mirror


Warp Drives May Come With a Killer Downside

An anonymous reader writes "Alcubierre warp-drives (theoretically) allow rocket ships to travel faster than the speed of light, while staying within the rules of Einstein's general theory of relativity. New research (PDF) has shown that as such warp-drives zip through the universe, they gather up particles and radiation, releasing them in a burst as the warp-drive slows down. This is bad news for family and friends waiting for the ship to arrive, as this intense burst will fry them."

82 of 458 comments (clear)

  1. This is why you drop to impulse in a solar system by Y-Crate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Duh

  2. duh by Moheeheeko · · Score: 4, Funny
    Because we all know you drop to sublight IN the docking station.

    >thisfuckingguy.jpg

  3. Not even real and already weaponized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yup.

    1. Re:Not even real and already weaponized. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You mean, just like the A-bomb?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Not even real and already weaponized. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      Everything that uses and harnesses energy inherently is a weapon.

      Fire can cook and protect. It can also kill.

      Nuclear energy can provide energy for thousands of people. Nuclear materials can also be constructed in a way to kill those thousands of people too.

      Any future technology that could create an artificial star may in fact be used to blow one up. Or at the very least snuff one out.

      Dynamics change, but the proportions of nurture to kill do not.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  4. "We'll be there in a sec... by Openstandards.net · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... May the force be... uh... ummmm... so, sorry!"

    1. Re:"We'll be there in a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I sense a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices all cried out in terror, and then were suddenly silenced. So ease up on the damn brakes next time, Solo."

  5. Seriously? by AmigaMMC · · Score: 4, Funny

    They came to that conclusion now? Every newly certified spaceship pilot knows that you must drop out of warp no less than an AU from destination.

    1. Re:Seriously? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      In the Star Wars novels, planets even have field generators which stop you from entering the solar system in warp.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Star Wars uses hyperspace, not warp. Get off my lawn!

  6. Northern Lights and Killer Asteroids by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So you drop out of warp outside the Van Allen belts and everybody gets a nice light show.

    Worst case you only use Warp Drive as far in system as Mars and use more conventional means from there to Earth.

    Hell using Warp drive through the Oort cloud or Asteroid Belt might be troublesome if you just start picking up crap when passing through dense matter. You slow down and all of the asteroids and comets you picked up are on a colission course for Earth. I suggest some different approach vectors might be the first precaution.

    1. Re:Northern Lights and Killer Asteroids by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      So you drop out of warp outside the Van Allen belts and everybody gets a nice light show.

      Worst case you only use Warp Drive as far in system as Mars and use more conventional means from there to Earth.

      Hell using Warp drive through the Oort cloud or Asteroid Belt might be troublesome if you just start picking up crap when passing through dense matter. You slow down and all of the asteroids and comets you picked up are on a colission course for Earth. I suggest some different approach vectors might be the first precaution.

      An Aggie with warp drive is what caused the Oort cloud.

  7. Apparently these guys never watched any Star Trek by guspasho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is what the deflector array is for. Like, the original purpose, not the solution-of-the-week it usually gets jury-rigged for.

  8. Visit The In-laws! by RapidEye · · Score: 3, Funny

    Makes a visit to the Mother-In-Law worth while now!

    --
    "Murderer? Well, that's a harsh word. I prefer to think of myself as a Mortality Technician."
  9. Re:Apparently these guys never watched any Star Tr by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean, as in:

    Data: Geordi, in my experiments to become more like a human, I seem to have lodged Captain Picard up my positronic rectum

    Geordi: Wow, Data, I mean, um.... Maybe I don't want to know. But I tell you what, we'll set up a tachyon burst through the deflector array and that should cause your mechanical sphincter to open. If we're lucky, it will also fry his brain so he won't remember you stuffing him in there.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  10. Re:bussard collector by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More like needing the radiation equivalent of a Catalytic Converter...

    If one knows that some undesirable trait will manifest, look at ways to mitigate that undesirable trait.

    Or, use that trait beneficially. If the act of dropping out of warp releases a fuckton of energy, find a way to harness that energy.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  11. Helluva weapon by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sent from a long distance, nearly undetectable, essentially unstoppable. When it arrives, its arrival is itself a weapon, plus whatever payload it is carrying.

    --
    What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
    1. Re:Helluva weapon by Bentov · · Score: 2

      No doubt, instant destruction, and occupation force in one nice and tidy package :) Galactic conquest can be in your hands now!

  12. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    If this is our biggest barrier to developing one tomorrow, then why don't we have these already?

    Because nobody has figured out exactly how one would warp space, only that it's theoretically possible.

  13. Queller Drive by kharbour · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Space:1999, the Alcubierre warp-drive was known as the Queller Drive. There was an episode about this exact subject (the drive killing everyone) in the first season episode, Voyager's Return: http://www.fanderson.org.uk/epguides/spaceyr1eg3.html#Episode%20Twelve. In an almost unbelieveable coincidence, I happened to be watching it at the exact moment this Slashdot story came in. Spooky.

    1. Re:Queller Drive by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you're the other Space 1999 fan.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Awesome!!! by busyqth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a great thing! Now we know how to wipe out all our alien competition!

    1. Re:Awesome!!! by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Maybe we could practice on asteroids.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Awesome!!! by Kjella · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh, if we had this technology then the easiest way of wiping out the competition would be to not stop. You get all the mentioned effects plus the ship itself as an RKV and any destruction the warp field can do to their planet. It's like the difference between an asteroid and a space capsule - it's easy to hit Earth, it's harder not to leave a crater on impact...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Awesome!!! by DinDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now we know why no one answers our calls. They've seen Star Trek.

      "It's that little planet out near the rim calling again."
      "Sssshh. Just pretend we're not home, or they might come over."

    4. Re:Awesome!!! by EdIII · · Score: 2

      I don't think we need to worry about competition. We are already beaming out our TV broadcasts into space.

      If you think about that.... it progresses from Hitler, to variety shows, to I Love Jeannie, some really weird shit in the 70s, stuff we want to forget about in the 80's, the beginnings of Idiocracy in the 90's... to Ghost Hunters, The Search for Bigfoot, and Snooki.

      Any alien species that picks up those broadcasts is probably smart enough to stay away at all costs.

  15. No brakes!!! by gregarican · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not sure about the theoretical effect of stopping, since the original theory postulates that once riding that warp bubble there's no way to stop...

    1. Re:No brakes!!! by Yo_mama · · Score: 2

      Before we broke the sound barrier there were some calculations that showed that air loads would approach infinite as the aircraft approached the speed of sound. Obviously that proved to not be true, demonstrating that some models ought to be taken with a grain of salt.

      --
      Never understimate the power of human stupidity -Lazarus Long
  16. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

    Urban renewal?

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  17. Re:To be clear, this isn't "bad" news... by gregarican · · Score: 2

    Did you post this from your quantum computer???

  18. Fermi Paradox by medv4380 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless the resulting burst is a Gamma Ray Burst we should already have seen other aliens using this kind of tech.

    1. Re:Fermi Paradox by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unless those aliens that have space-warping technology have already also solved the problem of particle/radiation collection and burst release. If they can travel faster than light, is it really much of a stretch to imagine they might have figured this out too?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    2. Re:Fermi Paradox by Oligonicella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not just that, but probably determine how to collect it as usable energy. Many articles like this don't bother thinking any deeper than one.

    3. Re:Fermi Paradox by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 3, Informative
      Also, this from tfa:

      “Any people at the destination,” the team’s paper concludes, “would be gamma ray and high energy particle blasted into oblivion due to the extreme blueshifts for [forward] region particles.”

      So maybe that's exactly what we have been seeing! :D

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    4. Re:Fermi Paradox by medv4380 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then we just end up in the other areas of the Paradox like why if they have FTL travel they should have already come here, and there should be clear evidence of it. I'd rather think that this kind of tech gets developed tested and the entire civilization that made it is wiped out by the test flight.

    5. Re:Fermi Paradox by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 2

      There are any number of reasons why they might not want to come here or why we might not notice them. For sure the Fermi Paradox has some interesting arguments, but I don't believe that just because we haven't seen them coming here (or recognized them, maybe they're already here and we just don't see it!) doesn't mean they aren't out there.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    6. Re:Fermi Paradox by Belial6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are many patches of earth in my back yard that I have not set foot on. There are no doubt many living things in those patches of dirt. The fact that I have not interacted with he insignificant life forms in the out of the way places of my back yard in no way implies that I don't exist.

    7. Re:Fermi Paradox by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Funny

      From their perspective, you might as well not.....

      Plus, I'm sure your HOA wishes you would mow more.

    8. Re:Fermi Paradox by ModernGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just like a sonic boom when breaking the sound barrier, traveling faster than light may create a burst of light and radiation.

      l33t

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    9. Re:Fermi Paradox by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gene Roddenberry was right again!

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    10. Re:Fermi Paradox by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      That doesn't mean what you think it does.

      That means that both Gods and aliens are largely if not completely irrelevant and belief in either is nothing to get terribly excited about. Never mind starting wars and such.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:Fermi Paradox by Randseed · · Score: 2

      Unless the resulting burst is a Gamma Ray Burst we should already have seen other aliens using this kind of tech.

      But we do see unexplained, massive gamma ray bursts all over the place. For all we know, we're seeing what happened when someone dropped out of warp 5 million years ago or something in another galaxy.

    12. Re:Fermi Paradox by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you use the same logic, not observing God interacting with the world does not imply that God does not exist.

      So many of the same arguments apply to both proving the existence/nonexistence of God and proving the existence/nonexistence of extraterrestrials.

      The difference is that "God," as generally defined by believers, is a being who specifically does interact with His creation. There is not (and probably will never be) any evidence either way on the hypothesis of a "watchmaker" who set the universe in motion and then left it alone, but that's not the God people pray to, either. If you believe in the power of prayer, or in the Bible as a moral rulebook, or any of the million and one other things which believers are constantly pushing, you have to believe in a God who should have left evidence of His active involvement all over the place, and yet has mysteriously failed to do so. There are people who believe in active involvement in human affairs by aliens too, of course, but they're a fringe minority rather than being in the mainstream of those who speculate on the possibility of extraterrestrial life.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    13. Re:Fermi Paradox by Surt · · Score: 2

      Because Texas is a well known communist paradise? Texas tried to move so far to the right they accidentally wrapped around and became virulent leftists.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    14. Re:Fermi Paradox by quacking+duck · · Score: 5, Informative

      After reading the "bad news" I immediately thought of how even Star Trek had already addressed this: the Bussard collectors at the front of all warp drives are designed to scoop up interstellar particles and radiation for fuel replenishment.

      Obviously Trek is a work of fiction, but the collectors are based on actual theoretical Bussard ramjets/ramscoops proposed in 1960.

      And yet 52 years later, with Star Trek providing at least speculative options and real-life regenerative braking on electric and hybrid cars around us, the write-up didn't even think to speculate about somehow collecting and using that energy.

    15. Re:Fermi Paradox by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you believe in the power of prayer, or in the Bible as a moral rulebook, or any of the million and one other things which believers are constantly pushing, you have to believe in a God who should have left evidence of His active involvement all over the place, and yet has mysteriously failed to do so.

      That which ye seek, so shall ye find.

      If a person believes in a meddling deity, and looks for evidence of such, they will find it.

      If a person believes in a deity who has a firm stance of non-interference, and looks for evidence of such, they will find it.

      If a person believes in no deity at all, and looks for evidence of such, they will find it.


      That's the real problem of theology/anti-theology as an argument: It's a purely subjective realm of thought, and thus every person looking through the same window will, depending on their theological beliefs, see the world differently.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re:Fermi Paradox by DinDaddy · · Score: 2

      Yes it is. They are just dark matter cats. I saw one in the basement once.

    17. Re:Fermi Paradox by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your scale is a bit off.

          I'll make some assumptions for you. :)

          You are an average male, with a size 10.5 shoe, and you have two feet.

          Your yard is 1 acre, with no other objects obstructing it.

          We are only considering a single plane for both your yard, and our solar system.

          The size of your foot equals the size of the earth (cross section at the equator).

          Then....

          If your foot were the size of the earth, the soles of your shoes would have had contact with 0.205381533% of the area of the Earth's orbit around the sun.

          I guess you're just about right then. We like to think we know what's in space around us. As has been proven by recent near misses with asteroids, we are not necessarily aware of rocks the size of a city before they are *very* close to us, or in some instances have just missed us.

          There could be a small intelligent alien species in a small object say a spacecraft or natural body that we have passed off as "just a rock", somewhere between us and our sun, who do not meet the criteria for living on earth, and we wouldn't have ever known it existed.

          We like to standardize "life" on the terms we know. Any advanced life will be roughly 1.5 meters tall, weighing roughly 72.5 kilograms, biped form, which breaths a nitrogen/oxygen mixture. That makes a lot of assumptions, including the idea that it would breathe.

          It could be plausible that an alien species travels in a FTL space craft which is no larger than a mosquito. If it used Star Trek based warp technology, the resulting emissions if it slowed to "impulse" several planets away wouldn't even register as a change in background radiation.

          But, we are humans, and we know everything.

          I just hope that when we are visited, they do breathe oxygen, eat compatible foods, are tall enough so I can stand up in their ship, and they understand when I say "Thank goodness you've arrived, I've been waiting for years to get off this rock. Lets get out of here before the others try to kill you."

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    18. Re:Fermi Paradox by Junta · · Score: 2

      If you use the same logic, not observing God interacting with the world does not imply that God does not exist.

      It is pretty much the same and no less valid in either case. Science hasn't *disproved* either option nor has it provided evidence in support of either as well. The concept of God is not something that lends itself to being disproved since a believer can always say God does not want to be observed and so will not exist.

      'Aggresive' athiesm that declares there is no God is technically a faith kind of like how religion is also faith. Really the only scientificly sound postiion is agnosticism. Normally just science wouldn't lead someone to insist something doesn't exist that we have no evidence for or against, though I can see someone generally driven by science frustrated at a phenomenon with no supporting scientific evidence and adopting the contrary view out of sheer frustration.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    19. Re:Fermi Paradox by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      The problem is with the way this particular warp drive operates.

      It isn't the intersellar medium that produces the energy wave. It is the collateral effect of the warp field itself.

      More specifically, the edge of the warp bubble acts like an event horizon, and the radiation is hawking radiation that forms from virtual particles getting caught in it, and being made real.

      While the drive is "on", these particles are stuck to the event horizon of the warp bubble. They never get anywhere close to the ship, and as such never get funneled into any collector orifice.

      The longer the warp bubble is on, the more virtual particles will get caught, the bigger the blast wave when the bubble pops.

      One potential solution is a specially made "harbor" fascility that is designed for this very thing, so that ships arriving drop out of warp (and immediately stop. That's the beauty of this hypothetical warp drive), puke out the event shock, which is collected by the harbor commission's harbor ship, and then the ship takes off using conventional drive to its habitated destination.

    20. Re:Fermi Paradox by Surt · · Score: 2

      Yes, we've already been able to definitively sample one planet with life, and there is some pretty good evidence for life having made a go of it on at least 2 other bodies.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  19. How far? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2
    From tfa:

    In the case of forward-facing particles the outburst can be very energetic — enough to destroy anyone at the destination directly in front of the ship. “Any people at the destination,” the team’s paper concludes, “would be gamma ray and high energy particle blasted into oblivion due to the extreme blueshifts for [forward] region particles.”

    I do not see anywhere where it is mentioned how far in front of the ship the blasted into oblivion effects will occur. How close is directly in front of the ship?

  20. Re:Already handled by jamstar7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Except in Star Trek: 90210 they went to warp only a couple hundred meters from space dock and dropped out in Vulcan orbit. Don't get me started on what else was wrong with it.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  21. Re:It's simple, really. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2

    What happens when someone comes in behind you in the arrival lane? Since any FTL communication would by necessity be based on this unless yet another way to break the speed of light was discovered, you can't even send a "get the fuck out of the way, I'm coming in!" message without killing everyone in the arrival lane.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  22. Conservation of energy by rrohbeck · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate to be the party pooper, but:
    All the energy for those high energy particles has to come from somewhere, which means that it'll take ridiculous amounts of energy to create an Alcubierre drive, it it's possible at all.

    1. Re:Conservation of energy by Gotung · · Score: 2

      Not just ridiculous amounts of energy, but ridiculous amounts of negative energy. Which as far as I know only exists in theory.

    2. Re:Conservation of energy by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thats why we have politics, to generate ridiculous amounts of negative energy.

  23. Re:faster than the speed of light by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought that it was impossible (theoretically) to go faster than the speed of light.

    It is easy to theoretically go faster than the speed of light. It's darn near impossible to actually do it.

  24. Star Trek The Motion Picture by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Except that in the 23rd Century way back then, Pluto was a PLANET!!!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Star Trek The Motion Picture by mdmkolbe · · Score: 2

      Except that in the 23rd Century way back then, Pluto was a PLANET!!!

      It cost the tax payers a pretty penny to make it big enough to be a planet, but it was worth it.

  25. Re:okay! by leonardluen · · Score: 2

    sure exactly the thing we want for first contact with an alien race

    alien: i like these humans! they keep sending us these tasty frozen dinners and microwaving them upon arrival so they are nice and toasty warm upon delivery!

  26. Helicopters by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can injure boarding/deboarding passengers with the intense amount of static electricity that builds up on the rotors. Getting fried by discharge of built-up charged particles is not a new downside to travel methods.

  27. Re:Already handled by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was essentially one thing wrong: it was written by the same retards who did Transformers.

  28. Jet aircraft... by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jet engines (theoretically) allow large metal objects formed into a lifting body to fly though the air at great velocities. This causes them to accumulate great momentum. This is bad news for family and friends waiting on the runway for the aircraft to arrive, as this momentum will cause the aircraft to run into them and kill them.

  29. Dump it all on Mars by Tekfactory · · Score: 2

    Actually using Mars as a dumping ground to add more Mass and Heat, that was in Red Mars right?

  30. Re:Car Analogy by treeves · · Score: 2

    More like, every time you park your car, everyone within a half mile of the car gets hits by tires flying off the car at 50 mph.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  31. Re:To be clear, this isn't "bad" news... by SoTerrified · · Score: 2

    ...every single thing discussed here is based on theory, which tends to make me scratch my head as to how much we're spending funding research like this. Kind of hard to put the cart before the horse when you haven't even invented the wheel yet.

    I've heard about this kind of ignorance, but I'm a bit astounded to find it on Slashdot.

    Basically, we still haven't found the Higgs boson. Yet physics has advanced far beyond that point, leading to several breakthroughs that we are enjoying the benefits of. And with time, we're eventually going back to prove the Higgs boson. I could name similar "theory points" in almost every science where something has not been proven, but the evidence is enough that we can move forward making assumptions and make other breakthroughs. And we can enjoy the benefit of those breakthroughs long before we verify the 'unproven'.

    I weep for the mindset that you have where, if something is not yet proven, you believe that we shouldn't be funding anything beyond that point. That strikes me as very penny wise, pound foolish.

  32. Asimov by Kohenkatz · · Score: 2

    So basically, Asimov was right when he predicted that any interstellar travel would require death. See I, Robot chapter "Escape!" (or short story "Paradoxical Escape") http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape! He was just wrong about whose death it would be.

  33. Re:Easy Fix by bytestorm · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think the problem is the particles and energy are collimated, travelling in the same direction the Alcubierre wave front, kind of like a laser. It's probably going to hit something, someday. This Mass Effect 2 quote comes to mind.

    Gunnery Chief: This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight. Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kilotomb bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space. Now! Serviceman Burnside! What is Newton's First Law?
    First Recruit: Sir! A object in motion stays in motion, sir!
    Gunnery Chief: No credit for partial answers, maggot!
    First Recruit: Sir! Unless acted on by an outside force, sir!
    Gunnery Chief: Damn straight! I dare to assume you ignorant jackasses know that space is empty. Once you fire this husk of metal, it keeps going till it hits something. That can be a ship, or the planet behind that ship. It might go off into deep space and hit somebody else in ten thousand years. If you pull the trigger on this, you're ruining someone's day, somewhere and sometime. That is why you check your damn targets! That is why you wait for the computer to give you a damn firing solution! That is why, Serviceman Chung, we do not "eyeball it!" This is a weapon of mass destruction. You are not a cowboy shooting from the hip!
    Second Recruit: Sir, yes sir!

  34. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by v1 · · Score: 2

    Because nobody has figured out exactly how one would warp space, only that it's theoretically possible.

    More specifically, they've figured out all the neat things they can do with warped space, but just not how to accomplish it in the first place. Gravity, energy, magnetism, and mass all can warp space, but not in useful ways yet. I'd bet magnetism is going to be the way we do it, if ever.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  35. Rebel propaganda exposed! by telso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Remember when the Millennium Falcon jumped out of hyperspace and Alderaan was gone? What we now know is that the dust on the leading edge of the ship is what actually destroyed the planet, arriving just before the ship, leaving it in the middle of an "asteroid field". However, this would have been mighty embarrassing for the Rebellion, so they made up this myth of destruction by the "Death Star" (which wasn't even operational yet!) as the killer. Who do we have to prove otherwise, Leia? She's from the planet that got destroyed and head of the Rebellion; of course she'd lie to protect it (remember, she'd never consciously give it up)! Let's stop the propaganda in its tracks!

    Oh, and when Kenobi felt that disturbance in the force: it was a premonition of what they were about to do, but Mr. "I've seen a lot of crazy things" didn't believe in some "force"

  36. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by NEDHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, my ex wife can create an enormous bubble of negative energy with only a moment's notice...

  37. Re:Already handled by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    You know. There has to be something in DSM IV to describe the sort of neurological malfunction that can lead someone to watch, let alone like those fucking awful movies.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  38. Re:Already handled by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    But you see, the Transformers universe is occupied by humans with Shia LaBeouf's intellect. People like that would have a hard time not picking up a stick and doing themselves real harm long before they could ever stick it in an exposed cog.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  39. We knew this... by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 2

    Why do you think all warp capable vessels in Star Fleet have deflector arrays? Gosh, kids today not paying attention in interstellar physics...

  40. Re:bussard collector by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 2

    Actually, they never really said exactly everything that the Bussard collectors did. They very well could have also been used to suck up said particles just before exiting warp. I'll be in my parent's basement if anyone would like to discuss this further.

  41. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by owlstead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Proposing to use your ex as fuel is taking it a bit far...

  42. Re:To be clear, this isn't "bad" news... by GmExtremacy · · Score: 2

    I'd rather get rid of useless wars and defense funds, to be honest.

  43. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by v1 · · Score: 2

    yep, I'd agree, gravity certainly is an attractive Earth feature

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  44. Re:bussard collector by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    The big difference between this and KERS / a catalytic converter is that the energy you're trying to collect cannot be collected from inside the vehicle at all. A better analogy is an aircraft trying to collect the energy from its own sonic boom.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  45. Re:Already handled by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 2

    Actually, oddly enough it seems to me that much of science fiction is actually limited to a one-dimensional view of the solar system, much less a 2D view. The reference to Pluto is a good case and point.

    Everyone seems to think of the planets in such a fashion that they're strung together along a (long) straight road such that to travel "out" of the solar system from Earth you would have to pass along each planet in turn. Who's to say for any given year which planet (if any) you'll pass heading outward (opposite the sun) from Earth even while staying within the ecliptic plane.

    One may retort that this usage is just shorthand for each planet's orbit. But the problem is deeper than that. For one example, consider Tony Daniel's Superluminal. The entire series is about an inter-planetary war. The "geography" of the solar system is intrinsic to the plot - which planet can attack which, etc. And it's all wrong for the year of 3017. The book describes a group heading towards Triton for an attack with half the group "continuing on" to Pluto. Trouble is, from the starting planet during that year Pluto and Neptune are in very different directions (almost opposite).

    With regards to the warp drive, the ecliptic plane seems hugely relevant. For any inter-stellar travel, just plan things for one (or more) midpoint stop(s) such that your final leg has you heading relatively perpendicular to the ecliptic plane of the destination star system. Then pop out of warp slightly beyond the ecliptic plane (presumably near your destination planet) to dump the energy.

  46. Re:This is why you drop to impulse in a solar syst by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    This drive gives the old saying "you never really can go home" a whole new meaning.