Slashdot Mirror


Chevy Volt Meets High Resistance, GM Suspends Sales

Hugh Pickens writes "The Hill reports that GM has announced to employees at one of its facilities that it is suspending production of the Chevy Volt for five weeks and temporarily laying off 1,300 employees. Back when GM launched the beleaguered electric car, it boldly targeted sales of 10,000 in 2011 and 60,000 in 2012 but GM only sold 7,671 Volts in 2011 and just 1,626 so far this year. 'We needed to maintain proper inventory and make sure that we continued to meet market demand,' says GM spokesman Chris Lee. 'We see positive trends, but we needed to make this market adjustment.' Although President Obama promised he would buy a Volt 'five years from now, when I'm not president anymore,' the Volt has come under criticism from Republicans in Congress because of reports of its batteries catching on fire during testing. Ironically, the shutdown comes as gas prices are soaring, exactly the time when an electric car should be an easy sell." If it's still true that GM was taking a loss on every Volt sold, perhaps this is a blessing in disguise.

36 of 599 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot Suspending Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suspending production != Suspending sales. The two mean quite different things.

    1. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Suspending production != Suspending sales. The two mean quite different things.

      Very true. The sales number are low, and that's possible related to the cost of a Chevy Volt. I just did a quick search in my area and they're about $40,000. I'm never going to save $15k - $20k in gas over the life of the car, so buying a comparable car that runs on gasoline is probably a better value. There are some tax credits for buying an electric car, but even with those the price is still going to be far more than a "regular" car.

    2. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Zemran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I had kharma points I would credit you. I am a fanboy of the Volt but it is out of my price range. There are a lot of hurdles to overcome with the car and they are not doing enough to make it attractive. If you live in an apartment or terrace, it is impractical etc.. If you have the ability it is still going to take some modifications like not everyone has power in the garage etc. So the overall cost is a big problem. I realise that this is an early concept and that prices will come down as people switch but I think that most people will agree with you.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    3. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm never going to save $15k - $20k in gas over the life of the car, so buying a comparable car that runs on gasoline is probably a better value.

      Lately I've been finding this argument a little disingenuous. For example, if I were to lease a $38K all-electric vehicle my payments would be roughly $360/mo. At $4/gal the money I'd save on gasoline would make my monthly payments comparable to leasing a vehicle worth $20K under identical terms*. In terms of affordability, these who vehicles would almost the same for the duration of the lease. And yes, I figured the cost of electricity as well as gasoline.

      The cost difference manifests only in the residual cost, but I need not pay that if I decide not to buy out.

      =Smidge=
      *Your mileage may vary, of course.

    4. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by nschubach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not everyone leases vehicles though. I did once, and I'll never do it again. Tracking how many miles you can put on in a year and hoping you don't change jobs to somewhere further away is a PITA.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not the point, the point is that the headline is _FALSE_

      GM is _NOT_ suspending Sales.

      unbelievable sloppy editing here.

    6. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guess that explains why California is the most popular market for all-electric vehicles. Oh wait, no it doesn't...

      To be on cost-per-mile par with $4.50/gal gasoline electricity would have to cost over $0.50 per kWh. (Comparing 30MPG to 3.5mi/kWh economies). Where in California are people paying north of $0.50 per kWh?

      Once you've answered that we can discuss TOU metering schemes that actually make electricity for charging EVs cheaper than the nominal daytime rate.
      =Smidge=

    7. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by fafaforza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Selling close to 8000 vehicles where your projections were 10000 isn't that far off the target, and not enough to call it 'barely any demand'.

    8. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Volt is not really a "38k" vehicle in standard vehicle terms of quality and fit and finish, it's a $20k vehicle with $18k batteries. For comparison, the Chevrolet Cruze, a non-electric car which is built on the same platform as the Volt, is a 20k vehicle.

      You can lease a Cruze under similar terms as the Volt for $200/month less. So, yes, if you're spending $200 on gas and the electricity in your house is free, you pretty much break even. If you choose to buy instead of lease, $200/month over 36 months is comparable to the difference in depreciation between a 38K car and a 20K car. So you break even there too.

      Either way, you have to drive at least 20k miles/year to spend ~$200/month in gas for it to be financially worthwhile to go with the Volt. And you're not driving a car of any better quality or fit and finish than a Cruze.

    9. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are absolutely correct that running the electric heater decreases drivable range. EV manufacturers and owners have employed various tactics to deal with this: Preheating the car while it's still plugged in is the primary one, which significantly decreases the load on the heating system. The Nissan LEAF comes with a heated steering wheel and heated seats to keep the driver and passenger(s) warm without heating the entire cabin. Some owners have tried 12V electric blankets, adding homebrew or aftermarket heating systems, or most often just dressing warmly for the trip.

      But the real issue is not cabin heating, it's keeping the battery warm. A cold battery means lethargic chemistry, which means reduced power and (temporarily) lost capacity. This is the true nature of EVs in extreme climates.

      Fun fact: If the Volt's computer deems it the most efficient method, the gas engine will run just to generate heat. What a waste IMHO...
      =Smidge=

    10. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, my math is correct. Don't forget that if you lease, the dealer claims the $7,500 federal tax incentive (perhaps soon to be $10,000?) so that comes right off the top of the car's price. At that point you are no longer comparing $40K to $20K, you're comparing $32K to $20K. This makes ALL the difference.

      So... assuming MSRP minus incentive for a gross capitalized cost of approx. $32,000. 36 month lease, 45% residual. Bullshit fees and tax paid up front, plus $4,000 down (total money down: ~$8,100). Monthly payment is $370/mo.

      Based on the last 12 months of driving (9557.2 mi) and assuming $4/gallon + 28.88 MPG average over the past 12 months (yes, I keep detailed records), I would be saving about $110/mo. Based on mileage and electricity costs, I would be paying about $35/mo in electricity. Net savings of $75/mo which makes leasing this car comparable to $295/mo. Working backwards, with the same terms and down payment, that's equivalent to a $22,500 vehicle.

      So I rounded off from memory instead of re-opening my spreadsheet and was off by $2,500. Sue me. *shrug*

      You'll probably complain about the large money down sum. Fine, but it cuts both ways... How much I put down is irrelevant to the relative cost. Example: At $1,000 down the payments become $460 and $385 respectively - still a $75 difference.

      I used a 0.00224 money factor and a 15,000 mile/yr lease if you want to try it at home. I'll be happy to compare notes.
      =Smidge=

    11. Re:Slashdot Suspending Editing by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's all about flexibility. Your Cruze's overall energy cost (electricity + gas) will be much higher than the Volt for regular commuting, since the Cruze can't run on electricity, whereas the Volt can do so for 30-40 miles, which is enough for most commuters. A true EV like the Leaf can go farther, but 1) the Leaf is slow as shit, and tiny too, and 2) once you run out of juice in the Leaf, you're dead. In the Volt, you just switch over to gasoline and keep going. Then when you run out of gas after 300 miles (not too far from a regular car's range), you pull into a gas station and refuel and keep going. You can't do that with a true EV; it's limited to local driving only. So the Volt gives you the option of taking long-distance trips once in a while, even though the economy isn't as good as some smaller cars.

      So whether the car is for you depends on your usage pattern. If you mostly commute, but want the ability to take long-distance trips with the same car, it might be a good choice. If you just want to do a lot of long-distance driving, pick another car. If you want something for commuting only, and never plan to exceed 60-80 miles, then a Leaf might be a better choice. The main problem with the Volt as I see it is the price tag, which is $40k (but there's a $7500 federal tax credit too that you should take into account). However, Edmunds says the Leaf costs $35k (minus that same tax credit), so you're not saving that much going full-EV, and you're getting a smaller, slower car with probably a cheaper and more econobox-like interior (Edmunds says the Volt has the nicest and highest-quality interior they've seen in a Chevy). $35k is quite a lot for an economy car really. But the real one to beat is of course the Prius, which is downright reasonable at only $23k, though it doesn't have a plug-in option. There is a different Prius model just now coming out, with limited availability, that's a plug-in, but it costs $32k, a whopping $9k more than the regular version, though again the $7500 tax credit probably applies here; don't know if you can get that credit with the regular Prius but I doubt it.

  2. 7671 by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyway, 7671 volts is more than they used in an electric chair.
    The lawyers saw this number and stopped production: a customer might get hurt and sue...

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  3. Simpler than that by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One of the reviews summarised it as:

    Less economical than a Prius

    Not as good as a Prius

    Costs more than a Prius

    Buy a Prius.

    To use a reverse car analogy, it's Motorola Xoom to iPad2.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Simpler than that by silverhalide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can't compare the Volt to the Prius. Reviewers who do so are technically incompetent and dishonest.

      If you go by just putting gas in the thing, then yes, the Prius comes out favorably. If you compare a Corvette to a minivan by how many passengers you can haul in it, yes, it sucks.

      You're not supposed to regularly put gas in the Volt. If you are, you're using it wrong.

      The Prius is a gasoline-only hybrid (ignoring the new short-range plug-in version this year which only goes 8-11 miles on a charge or half a typical commute). The Volt is an extended-range electric vehicle.

      The Volt is a new class of vehicle. You plug it in regularly, and ideally you almost never put any gas in it. The Prius doesn't do that.

      So if you don't want to plug in your car and you want to keep using gas, yes, buy that Prius.

    2. Re:Simpler than that by bzipitidoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This!

      Hybrids are all the rage. But they really aren't that green. Batteries use metals that can be difficult to obtain and energy intensive to produce. They take far too long to recharge. And then they don't last. Pure electric would be the way to go if we had decent batteries, by which I mean batteries that approach the convenience of the humble gas tank. So we have this hybrid approach which uses both gas and electricity in combination. And it still needs a bit of battery capacity. All the expense, trouble and weight of both kinds of drive in one package!

      As if battery troubles aren't bad enough, a conventional gas powered direct drive vehicle is quite capable of beating the fuel economy of a hybrid. There's lots of low hanging fruit that manufacturers are still ignoring. They are finally improving transmissions, putting in more gears and dumping that huge, huge waste of gas known as the torque converter. Took them long enough, and there's plenty more. Aerodynamics could so easily be much better. Instant on/off for the gas engine would save big time, and erase the one big advantage hybrids do have: the better city fuel economy. Put up with bad batteries, and then not even get better fuel economy?!

      The Yaris is a start, but it is only a start.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  4. Too expensive by dietdew7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Without significant subsidies GM would have sold even fewer cars. The subsidy is a just transfer payment to the well off. High efficiency diesel engines are probably the most cost effective option for the masses and our stupid EPA requirements keep best ones out of the USA.

    1. Re:Too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without significant subsidies GM would have sold even fewer cars. The subsidy is a just transfer payment to the well off. High efficiency diesel engines are probably the most cost effective option for the masses and our stupid EPA requirements keep best ones out of the USA.

      Yes, it is quite stupid of the EPA to worry about nitrogen dioxide. The masses need cost-effective cars, not healthy lungs.

    2. Re:Too expensive by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Probably because in Europe they actually use clean diesel fuel. All those EPA laws that resulted in smog reduction on cars were never applied to diesel, because of lobbying by the trucking industry. If you applied the same standards to diesel fuel as unleaded it would be plenty clean.

  5. No surprise by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can buy TWO Ford Focus 40mpg cars for the same price as a Volt.

    Unlike other districts, there are no subsidies for the Volt in Saskatchewan.

    $20,000 buys a HELL of a lot of gasoline.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  6. A Joke by chill · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Volt costs $40,000 before tax rebates and only gets you 35 miles on an electric charge. Then 35 MPG city/40 hwy (gas) for 375 miles.

    The Toyota Prius starts at $24,000 and goes to $30,000 for their top end. Mileage is 51 MPG city/48 hwy for approximately 600 miles.

    So Chevrolet's market was people who have lots of money, are willing to spend it with abandon, want a car, but don't really need to drive much. In short, semi-rich idiot hipsters.

    I think they probably just saturated their customer base.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:A Joke by recursivedescent · · Score: 5, Informative
      Hmm, looks like none of the other ~7000 Volt owners read /. Had to go and create and create an account to provide at least one pro Volt response here. I bought my Volt in December, the pessimal time to get an electric car unless you live in LA or Florida. Yep, cold weather knocks a good 5 to 10 miles off the range. Even so, I really like this car. Growing up my parents had Pontiac station wagons, and I never thought I'd spend a dime on an American car, so I've owned a Saab, a Subaru, a VW, and a Toyota (Prius).

      I work out of two offices, my primary one which is a 36 mile commute, and another regional office, which is an 84 mile commute. Generally I go to my primary office 4 days a week. In cold weather, I'm on the gas engine maybe 2 to 3 miles, but if it's warm I'm electric all the way. I'm on gas for about 44 miles on the longer commute.

      I'm getting around 109mpg. Since early December, I've bought around $60 in gas. It's hard to tell due to the mild winter, but I think my electric bill has gone up around $25/mo.

      Sure, I could have bought a cheaper car, and I'll never save enough in gas (well, unless Iran destabilizes the middle East and we end up with $10/gal gas) to recover my cost, but I actually like driving the Volt. It's not a sports car, but it's not sluggish either. 0-60 is 9.2 seconds, but the instant torque from the electric engine makes it feel much faster. In "Sport" mode, it does 0-30 in 3.0 seconds.

      And it's made by Americans who seem to have figured out how to make a car that's as fun as any import I've owned. GM has plenty of problems, but maybe some of the cool Volt engineering will seep into their other cars.

    2. Re:A Joke by Rakishi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your numbers are way way way off. You probably missed a decimal point, it's $0.09 less (at best) per mile and not $0.90. Not counting maintenance and so on.

      That changes your examples significantly.

      Now your hypothetical ideal Volt candidate only saves $985.50 per year. And pays $20000 more for the car. In other words even the ideal user would lose money by buying a volt because they'd never make up the cost premium

      So yes, the comparison is very simple. The Volt sucks and no one should buy one.

  7. Who would have guessed? by medcalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you make a product for political reasons, not because there's a market, and then subject it to the market, it tends not to do well. Huh.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  8. Ohm I God! by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Volt meets Resistance. I couldn't resist.

    On a serious note, GM does not have a good record with respect to embracing effective change. Its management is still intellectually corrupt, except it is no longer led by executives who came up through sales/marketing and now has had government surrogates put in their places.

    GM has never had a working grip on the obvious, and I'm old enough to remember when GM-made cars were more than half of the world's output. They no longer have a monopoly, nor the world's biggest dealer network, and only, apparently, one profitable brand of auto -- Cadillac.

    So, as I told a friend who had inherited money in 2001 -- "Sell GM short. They're going down."

    It's true again, How long must GM wait before it can return to the courts for relief?.

  9. Re:EV1 lovers are MIA by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The do, and people do.

    I don't live in the US any more, but I'm hardly unique (ie, there are people like me still there) who would really love to go electric since our driving patterns are ideally suited to having a small, quiet, economical electric car that you recharge at night at home. (DISCLAIMER: yes, I'm aware, you need to tow your boat from LA to NYC every 2 days while simultaneously carrying 8 people and their luggage and there are no charging stations on route... electric cars useless for everyone etc etc, no possible use case etc etc...)

    However, the current economics aren't making them viable - they're just too expensive at the moment but it's a chicken and egg problem since it's early generation tech and in low initial demand.

    Don't mistake slow sales of a very expensive electric vehicle as definitive proof of a lack of interest. When (if?) I can buy one for a similar cost (also factoring in fuel costs) to the 2 litre turbodiesel minivan I drive right now (53 mpg EU / 44.1 mpg US) that can easily haul 5 adults and luggage then I am sure sales will pick right up. Cracking that early adopter and economy of scale problem is not easy though. Bear in mind that I also pay around $8 per gallon for diesel in the UK and it's still cheaper than going all-electric right now (or even to hybrid).

  10. Re:Japan and Europe is where the industry is by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    What does US have?

    Hollywood and Predator drones, so watch your fuckin' mouth.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. Re:Japan and Europe is where the industry is by Golden_Rider · · Score: 4, Informative

    Aren't Fords made in the US ?
    The ford focus is quite a nice and fairly popular car.

    As far as I know, the mk1 Focus was developed/built in Europe in 1998, and then Ford US built it in 2000, too, with some changes. The mk2 Focus was developed independently in Europe/US (US model was very different from Europe model and only a restyled mk1). The mk3 Focus was a joint development between Ford US and Europe, and is built both in US and Europe. So the Focus is not really a good example of a good car developed solely in the US.

  12. Re:Japan and Europe is where the industry is by kelemvor4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just bought an American made car last week, a Honda Odyssey. It tells you on the window sticker these days where stuff was made. Assembled in Lincoln, Alabama USA. Engine constructed in USA, Transmission constructed in USA. 70% of all parts for it come from the USA, 15% from Japan, and the rest from "other".

    That's good enough for me to call it American.

  13. But does it work? [Re:No surprise] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can buy TWO Ford Focus 40mpg cars for the same price as a Volt.

    Wow, I haven't heard anybody else suggest that simple technique for getting 80 mpg.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:But does it work? [Re:No surprise] by j2.718ff · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can buy TWO Ford Focus 40mpg cars for the same price as a Volt.

      Wow, I haven't heard anybody else suggest that simple technique for getting 80 mpg.

      Remember to connect them in series. If you connect them in parallel, you'll just get the 40mpg, but you can drive twice as fast.

  14. Re:EV1 lovers are MIA by pnewhook · · Score: 4, Informative

    While Volts sit in dealer's lots gathering dust,

    I went to the local GM dealer, and while they had one, they said it wasn't for sale. And if I wanted to buy one I'd be put on almost a year long waiting list. He basically said they were near impossible to get so dont bother right now.

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  15. Re:Japan and Europe is where the industry is by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My 2003 Monte Carlo has 220,000 miles on it. I did choose to replace the motor and trans (both used) at 200,000 miles though instead of rebuilding the trans when the pressure control solenoid gave out and repair would have cost as much as the replacement motor and trans together, so those only have around 72K on them. Runs like a dream and by the condition of the interior and exterior you would never know this car had anywhere near 100K miles much less 220,000. Any car from the "big three" built within the past 20 years that is worth buying these days can go 300,000 miles with basic maintenance. Cars were garbage in the 80's and I think a lot of the mentality around longevity in the US these days is still based on experiences with those cars.

  16. Re:Japan and Europe is where the industry is by Siridar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time I went to a auto show, they had the then-new Ferrari 575.

    I waved the sales guy over from beyond the velvet rope (the unwashed crowds not being allowed to mix with the "real" customers) and asked him "how much is a 100,000 kilometer service on one of those things?"

    the reply?

    "none of our vehicles /ever/ do that many kilometers."

    Delivered with just the right amount of "how dare you even THINK about driving your Ferrari that much? For shame, sir. FOR SHAME." sneering.

  17. Re:I know, I know by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Cannot get 4 adults plus dog plus ancillaries in a Yaris."

    Have multiple vehicles. I don't drive my F350 Ford or 366 big block Chevy truck unless I need to, but liability insurance is cheap and they are paid for.

    Multiple vehicles allows selection of the right tool for the job.

    Or rent what you need when you need it. We have a small car which we mainly use for commuting. When we need something bigger or with more cargo space (like a pickup), we rent from the city carshare program or a regular car rental agency which has surprisingly good weekend rates since they have a glut of cars from business travelers). The city carshare program is especially nice when I have to work late unexpectedly, they have cheap overnight rates and there are several locations within easy walking distance from work so I've always been able to get a car when I need it, even last minute. The overnight car rental rate is cheaper than it would cost to take a cab home.

    Our occasional car rental bill is much lower than our car payment would be on a second car.

  18. Two words by cortex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tesla Motors

    Telsa is planning on an ~$30,000 model in the next few years. If they achieve this price point and maintain the quality of their current models, I think that they will have an all electric car that many people will want