Slashdot Mirror


Cell Phone Jamming Devices Enjoy an Increase In Popularity

rullywowr writes "A story run by local new NBC10 of Philadelphia last Friday illuminated the fact that this particular rider of the pubilc bus system is packing a cell phone jammer and is not afraid to use it. Going by the name of 'Eric,' whenever he sees someone being 'rude' on the bus and talking loudly on their cell phone, he screws the antenna on and flips the power switch. Regardless of the steep civil penalites levied by the FCC (up to $16,000 USD), many (such as 'Eric') are still interested by these devices which can be bought on the internet for $40 to over $1000. Opponents of these devices say that not only do they interfere with mobile phones, they often can interfere with 'behind the scenes' communication, Wi-Fi, etc. Despite being illegal, TFA points out that they are readily available on the internet (what else is new?). Do you have an instance where you experienced the positive (or negative) effects of a cell phone jammer?"

41 of 805 comments (clear)

  1. I approve by WillyWanker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This guy is my new hero, even though he later backed down and said he wasn't going to use it anymore. I for one am fed up with the constant assault of cell phone conversations from people who have no idea how to be considerate to those around them.

    1. Re:I approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because your good at judging who should be on the phone and who shouldn't.

    2. Re:I approve by zrbyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think I need a jammar for you're bad grammar!

    3. Re:I approve by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My proposal for movie theaters and restaurants. By default, these facilities should have cell phone jamming technology enabled with a clear sign stating as such. Also, the sign will point to a red painted receiver designated for 911 use only. Think of the emergency concept of a fire extinguisher and apply that to wired phones and you get the idea.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:I approve by pedrop357 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The other problem is that many times the person claims the jamming signal is confined solely within their property/building/domain, yet the jamming signal affects those outside of the jammer's property. That becomes a huge problem.

      Those who wish to stop cell phone use should first STOP installing indoor repeaters, then use some form of radio wave blocking paint/building materials. Whatever method they use should be passive and not directly interfere with other property's cell phone signals.

    5. Re:I approve by duguk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah and the side effect of it blocking the person trying to make a wireless 911 call. Who cares about the innocents caught in this, right?

      Why would anyone be making a private 911 call on a bus? Especially without any of the other passengers knowing?

      I mean, I'm not agreeing with this; but that's a ridiculous claim under this scenario.

    6. Re:I approve by tom17 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think someone has a 'whoosh' jammer switched on near you.

    7. Re:I approve by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I generally don't use my cell phone where I think you shouldn't. This includes restaurants, theatres, public transit, etc.

      If it rings, I may look at it to see who is calling. I won't answer it and sometimes just leave the phone on vibrate.

      I don't understand why people think they must be able to talk on the phone everywhere. I find it more annoying now with a cell phone, as people pretty much expect you to answer it as they're calling you directly and not your house.

      I do it in degrees. If it's a casual group of my friends, I will excuse myself and leave the group to take the call outside, so I don't subject them to my conversation, then return back when I'm done.

      If it's a more formal event, phone's on vibrate and only in dire emergencies would I answer. And even then I'd politely excuse myself from the group.

      And texting/emailing is a no-no unless there's a very good reason - all live conversations have priority over a texted one except in emergencies. Surfing the web is limited to only if it's something the group requires (e.g., resolving an argument or looking something up).

      And no, I don't have voicemail.

      Anyhow, yes it's illegal, but if you do it right, it can be hard to detect (the only way to track a jammer is to triangulate its position - there's no magic CSI GPS beacon). Perhaps when the bus reaches a certain intersection implying a dead spot for signals, and never more than neessary to break the connection (should just be a few seconds).

      I suppose the bigger question is - why have manners deteriorated to the point that the general public feels it's necessary to take technological measures to fix social problems? The purchase and use of jammers is just a symptom of an underlying societal problem

    8. Re:I approve by Almandine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The peeple making the emergency calls may not necessarily be on the bus, just within range of the jammer. For example, maybe the bus is stuck in traffic due to an accident and people outside are trying to make emergency cals.

    9. Re:I approve by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There may be other urgent calls a person would like to be able to receive. Business calls, family emergency, but who knows now right? Because this selfish asshole has decided that nobody on the bus should be able to make any calls because he can't deal with the reality of living around other people in the 21st century.

      I hope all these morons get caught and have the book thrown at them.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    10. Re:I approve by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, in Chicago it's against the law to sleep on public transportation, but not illegal to talk on a cell phone (at a resonable volume).

      Best quote I ever heard on the train: "Honey, I've got to hang up - everyone's looking at me like I'm 'That Guy' ". Got quite a laugh out of the other riders.

    11. Re:I approve by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because that person couldn't hear the call anyway because Aunt Bessie's corgi has asthma and she had to take it to the vet and it cut into her bridge game and she was about to win against that impossible skank Dolores the Applebee's manager who refused a refund on some disgustingly awful soup I think it was minestrone but maybe it was chicken noodle, but anyway, we're not going back to that Applebee's and we also called the regional office to tell them how awful Dolores is not that they'll do anything, I bet she sleeps with her boss, the skank, anyway the corgi is...hold on, will you shut up about your chest pains and difficulty breathing?! Can't you see I'm on a VERY IMPORTANT call?! The world doesn't revolve around you!!...so the corgi is fine now, but they have to take her in next month as a check up and I'm worried, damnit...No, I will not be quiet so you can talk to some "dispatcher!" This is a free country and I can talk as loud as I want!... God, some people are so RUDE!

    12. Re:I approve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      God YES!!

    13. Re:I approve by Rufus+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You only need to turn the jammer on long enough for the douche to drop carrier.

    14. Re:I approve by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      30 years ago no one had cell phones... things havent gotten THAT much more important in 30 years

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    15. Re:I approve by demonbug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah and the side effect of it blocking the person trying to make a wireless 911 call. Who cares about the innocents caught in this, right?

      Not to mention the five people quietly texting away, or browsing the web, emailing, etc. Basically, the idiot vigilante is screwing everyone over because of one loudmouth. And lets not forget the cell-based position reporting of the bus/train/whatever, or the GPS that his $40 jammer is also screwing with, and so on. Yes, the guy talking loudly on his phone is an asshat; the guy jamming everybody is even worse.

    16. Re:I approve by mswope · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or, install an indoor repeater with a dummy load on the outdoor antenna port. The signal from the cell phone will be "captured" by the repeater, but the user won't be able to get a channel to place a call.

    17. Re:I approve by asliarun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An who the hell are you to determine when someone can use their phone? Buses/trains are not bedrooms, sleep in your bed, not on the bus. Don't like someone talking, wear earplugs. If you haven't noticed buses/trains are not the quietest places and phone feedback makes it easy to think your not speaking loud enough. Buses and trains are public congregation points like any other and people have the freedom to speak/entertain themselves as they please. Don't like it, drive your own car. Personally, I hope these jamming pricks run into people with detectors, and forget jail just a good ass whipping should do and then a technology ban.

      Aggressive in-your-face "i do what i want" behavior only works if you manage to pull it off without being a jerk to others. What if a guy sitting next to you was coming back from a soccer game and blew a compressed air 120db horn next to your ear? What if someone on the train spat in your face when talking to their neighbor or dropped mustard in your lap while eating a sandwitch and didn't even apologize?

      Don't like it? Drive your own damn car. It's easy to have a tough attitude about personal liberty. Difficult when you are facing the brunt of it.

      And yes, someone talking for a few minutes on the phone and trying to keep their voice low in a crowded train is one thing. Someone talking very loudly for a couple of hours in a crowded train is completely another thing. There's no rule book for this - the assumption is that as a citizen of society, you would be considerate to others and learn how to co-exist without getting into a fistfight every day. Unfortunately, so many people nowadays are so self-absorbed and grow up with a sense of entitlement, they're forgotten how to be a gentle human being (without necessarily being a pushover). Or they turn their nose at the concept.

    18. Re:I approve by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      30 years ago no one had cell phones... things havent gotten THAT much more important in 30 years

      Are you kidding! We have terrorists now! And child molesters! And child molesting terrorists! Think of the children! If you're against everyone calling 911 you must be a communist! I bet they don't have 911 in Communistic countries! USA! USA!

      I'd even bet that thirty years ago they didn't even have italics!

      You must be a pervert.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    19. Re:I approve by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't use Facebook. I barely use my phone actually, so you'd think I'd be in the bitter neckbeard camp, but I'm not a horrible selfish sociopath.

      Also I guess your dad is rich so you've never had to hunt for a job. One missed call CAN fuck you up.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    20. Re:I approve by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I take it that was your fist time on a bus~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:I approve by meerling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More than enough to mess with the cars on the road beside you, people on the sidewalks, and in some places it can interfere with the homes. Even if it has a 'range' of about 10m, that's it's effective range of jamming, there is no magical sudden stop for radio waves, it just gets weaker but can still interfere.
      Here's a bizarre bit of info, the centrifuge devices they use at my local bloodbank get messed up by cell signals. They don't know why, and I haven't found an explanation for it, but it does happen, that's why they ban cell phones there. And remember, that jammer is stronger than a cell phone signal, if one was used on the road just outside, it could really screw things up.

      I'd love to use an emp generator on that douchebag music hater that drives by at 3am with his car vibrating so loudly you can't even guess what the beat is much less the 'music' he's blasting. I can get the parts for a one-shot device, and place it in range of where his car will be. But I don't because there will be a lot of collateral damage, much of which I can't predict before hand.

      Shutting down the scum and douches, great. Getting anyone else in your blanket attack, you're worse than they are.
      So tell you what, next time someone is too loud on their phone, find where you left your dick, show a slight amount of courage, and tell them "Hey loudmouth, show a little consideration to the other people here and keep it down!". If you can do that instead of being a weaselly coward, make sure you do it loud enough so that not only can he hear ot, but whomever he is talking to can as well. (It's a much bigger deterrent if the person on the other end knows he's being a jerk than if he does himself.)

    22. Re:I approve by Windwraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt the jammer device would be considerate enough to restrict its area of effect to the bus. There might be people you don't see being affected by the jammer, people using their phones silently, people using their phones for actual important stuff.

      Someone with a jammer is just a little delinquent with too much self-entitlement. Pretty much the radio equivalent of a script kid.

    23. Re:I approve by yurtinus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares? One person is being loud and because you're too passive-aggressive to politely ask them to quiet down, you're going to block *everybody* from using the service - including those quietly streaming music, surfing, or messaging? Why is it suddenly your place to enforce your will upon everybody on the bus?

      --
      +1 Disagree
    24. Re:I approve by Imrik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He may know about it, but if he's the one that needs help he may not be able to turn it off.

  2. Re:I use my iPad on the train by Hnice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah -- I mean, this is the problem. Like, frequently -- most of the time -- I sort of wish that talkers would, you know, die, but there's lots of unobtrusive usage that's nobody's business.

    I'll tell you what I really think is going to happen: I think in 10 or 15 years, we're going to look back on this time period, and be sort of aghast at how people behaved with regards to their phones. I don't accept that things are moving in a more-talk-is-OK direction, I think that there's the possibility that this is a manners-haven't-caught-up-to-tech blip. There's going to be a certain amount of soul-searching as we deal with the driving issue, and I'm hoping that what will come out of that will be, 'Wait -- is what I have to say really important enough to need saying, now, in these circumstances?'

    And I'm not generally optimistic about human nature. But cell phone usage, I just don't see how this can go on very much longer as it is -- I mean, it's raw uncut assholishness, all the time, and everyone KNOWS it, but for now, they all DO IT anyway.

    My fingers are crossed for what alcoholics refer to as a 'moment of clarity'.

    --

    god is just pretend.

  3. Re:As a Philadelphian who rides SEPTA Daily... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you've got an issue with a particular person talking on her phone, sit down beside her and make snarky remarks until she shuts up or hits you. Don't interfere with everyone else in the area just for your personal convenience. Hey... that's what you're mad at baby mamma for doing isn't it?

  4. negative effect by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you have an instance where you experienced the positive (or negative) effects of a cell phone jammer?"

    Yeah. I was having a stroke and nobody could understand why I was flopping about with half my face looking like it was ready to melt off. I reached for my phone, dialed 911... and nothing happened. Then I died. I had to submit this as a ghost because nobody thinks about what blocking a communications medium does to innocent people, they just want to get at the one asshole amongst the dozens or so in the area abusing it.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:negative effect by janeuner · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fictional settings, people retain enough dexterity to dial a phone while having a stroke.

  5. Right to not be annoyed? by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Audio pollution isn't something you get to have control over. Feel free to tell someone they're being annoying, but sometimes you're just going to have to deal with someone talking on their phone in a way that annoys you. If it's not that, it will be someone talking loudly to the person standing next to them. Or a person honking their horn to much or for no reason. Or someone with their cell phone's speaker turned on as they listen to MP3s. Or jackhammers or machinery or the buzz of a refrigerator. How are you going to jam that?

    --

    Long signatures suck.
    1. Re:Right to not be annoyed? by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, we do not have the right to not be annoyed, in public places. The bus/train arguably qualifies as "public", but I will never understand why, for example, restaurants and movie theaters (most of them) tolerate behavior this is, to say the least, boorish and disruptive to the experience of the other customers. Just once, I'd love to see the dumb-ass at the next table have her meal removed and shown the door, with the explanation that manners count and those without them are unwelcome.

  6. Re:As a Philadelphian who rides SEPTA Daily... by SJester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I ride the infamous A train in NYC and my jammer is a relief. I experience much the same - hellfire preachers, drunks pissing on the floor, and stoned thugs arguing about which court they're supposed to be in today. The train is held at the station about once a month for police to search it. My ride is nearly two hours and a jammer makes it a bit quieter. I don't even turn it on for most of the ride; why would I interfere with Words with Friends or a quiet phone call? But when someone starts screaming into their phone they discover there's no service anymore.

  7. Re:I use my iPad on the train by foo1752 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, it's raw uncut assholishness, all the time, and everyone KNOWS it, but for now, they all DO IT anyway.

    Actually, the point is that the assholes don't think what they're doing is assholish at all. This will never change.

  8. Re:As a Philadelphian who rides SEPTA Daily... by QuasiSteve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can tell you with what joy it is to live in a city where listening to B-grade hip hop music on tinny cell phone speakers is the norm. That you can't stop

    You can't, or you won't?

    but when I have to be subjected to a very lengthy screaming match between baby-momma and her baby-daddy, with a push of a button I can cut that nonsense out.

    I see...

    I can't do much about the panhandlers that pass through the trains hocking bootleg DVDs, scented oils or begging for quarters,

    really? you can't? hmm

    but I CAN do something about the chaff of society who can't keep their Jerry Springer drama to themselves, and so I shut them down with a jammer

    Oh okay, I see what you're saying now.

    If you could turn off all the B-grade hip hop music with the push of a button, you would.
    If you could shut the panhandlers down with a jammer, you would.

    In essence, if you could do something about X in practical anonymity with an easily concealed device with little to no chance of getting caught, you would.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not calling you chickenshit. Certainly it's much better to avoid conflict with the baby-momma and her posse by just letting her call drop instead of confronting her in person.

    Unfortunately, however, it also means you're affecting the person just quietly talking, the person just doing some texting, the person just browsing the web, and - provided that the bus isn't a magic faraday cage for your outgoing jammer signal - anybody in the vicinity of the bus.

    Not to mention that...

    If an emergency crops up, I turn the device off.

    ...it's impossible for you to determine that. For one thing, you can't magically know about remote emergencies that require a person to be called.

    For another, what if you are the emergency? You're on the highway, you get a heart attack, you fall down, your jammer's still on - nobody can call it in.. they flag down another driver, their phone doesn't work either, they figure it must just be reception there, so (rather than asking another drive to call from somewhere where they can get a signal) they drive the bus further to get a signal again, but still nothing.

    I know, society survived without cellphones, I'm sure it will when somebody misses, or can't place, an important call just as well.

    But please do choose your jamming moments wisely, and consider the unintended consequences - be that your own untimely demise (I <3 my contrived example!) or somebody's casual game of Wordfeud being cut short.

  9. Re:Illegal Toys for Passive-Aggressive Cowards by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    You must take classier buses than some of us...

  10. Censorship? by Veggiesama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Folks, this is Slashdot, so I expect some more consistency in in your positions. Here we are supposed to be proponents of network neutrality, ardent supporters of anti-censorship methods, and unrepetent voices in support of freedom of information all over the world. We don't like governments mucking with DNS servers, and we hate the publishing companies trying to tell us how we should and shouldn't use our media.

    Yet, here is a guy who passes swift judgment on others and renders their expensive cell phones inoperable for the sole reason that a single individual personally annoys him. He does this anonymously in public spaces, and the victims of his jammer have no recourse to repair their device. The loud, obnoxious caller suffers the same fate that the quiet girl chatting to her mother from three seats back does: everyone is silenced indiscriminately.

    For some bizarre reason, the hivemind of Slashdot holds this one-man censorship czar in high esteem, but they would probably object to a public school, library, or hospital prohibiting cell phone use via means of a jammer for the same reasons he uses.

  11. You are not more important than others. by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I for one am fed up with the constant assault of cell phone conversations from people who have no idea how to be considerate to those around them.

    While you're sitting there like a fat little smug antisocial nerd who thinks the world revolves around him and reading his Ayn Rand in peace and quiet, the psychologist three seats in front of you is desperately hoping that none of his patients are feeling suicidal at that particular moment.

    I have friends who are doctors, some of them psychologists. They're on call a great deal of the time, and people don't call their psychologist to talk about the weather. They call with things like "I'm having suicidal thoughts."

    I have a friend who is an eye surgeon. When she's on-call, she sometimes gets patients who have hours or less before they could permanently lose their eyesight from an injury or complications from an earlier surgery.

    I'm not saying THEY are more important. I'm saying their PATIENTS are. You have not seen panic until you've seen a psychologist who has a private practice and discovers her cell phone ran out of battery at some point, and she's an hour from a charger...

    I've actually seen a psych emergency unfold, too - the psychologist-friend working with 911 operators and the police and EMS to find the patient and get them to a hospital. That can't happen unless they can reach their doctor to ask for help. Too bad for them some fat asshole nerd is sitting there giggling with his cell phone jammer.

  12. Re:Difference between smoke and conversation by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now if only they could invent a jammer for people who have their headphones cranked up to 11 until I swear their ears must be bleeding. If it is loud for me sitting next to you I can only imagine what must be left of your hearing.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  13. Obligatory: Why Cell Conversations Are Distracting by JoeDuncan · · Score: 4, Interesting
  14. passive aggressive much? by Ameryll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're also jamming the receipt of said important calls, which the jammer has no knowledge of. For instance, what if there's a doctor on the bus who doesn't get the call saying he's needed in emergency surgery, or there's an undercover cop on the bus watching for trouble (we have undercover cops in Boston for instance) who doesn't get a call saying that he's needed for something.

    Why is the right answer to jam them and everyone around them? Why not walk up to them and ask them to bring the volume down? Why must we resort to under-handed/passive aggressive techniques that affect others that aren't violating the social rules?

  15. Re:As a Philadelphian who rides SEPTA Daily... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And I'm sure that annoying cell phone user would tell you that if you want peace and quiet, stay home.

    You're acting illegally, without regard to others because you're somewhat annoyed by the behaviour of a few people and going over and you don't "feel like" going over and telling them so. I take it back. You're WAY more selfish and inconsiderate than baby momma.

    Someone else used the phrase "passive-agressive nerd rage." It fits you pretty well.