Slashdot Mirror


Coca-Cola and Pepsi Change Recipe To Avoid Cancer Warning

jones_supa writes "California has added 4-methylimidazole (a caramel coloring) to the list of carcinogenic compounds that require an explicit warning when added to foodstuffs. Incidentally, this has entailed the big two cola producers to modify their recipe to decrease the amount of the substance — just enough to avoid the warning. The change to the recipe has already been introduced in California but will be rolled out across the U.S. to streamline manufacturing. The American Beverage Association noted that there is not enough evidence to show the coloring to cause cancer in humans."

16 of 398 comments (clear)

  1. Re:California by A10Mechanic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do we know that California doesn't cause cancer? How can we be sure? Is there a proximity? Do people in Nevada get some sort of horrible sickness?

  2. Re:California by oracleguy01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except the TSA body scanners... those are very safe. Unlike the food coloring in cola that is cancer in a bottle.

  3. Re:Might as well go all the way by nman64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In California, correlation is sufficient to claim causation.

  4. All risk is relative by VernorVinge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The same 1000 cans argument can be made for aspartame as a sweetner, tail pipe exhaust, and smoking crack. What if you're that one person with a a genetic predisposition to get cancer from this substance? We should be doing what the EU has done for years- make manufacturers prove substances are safe for consumption before including them as ingredients.

    --
    Stay skeptical, my friends.
  5. Re:Might as well go all the way by blacklint · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I ever become a billionaire, I'm going to hire a blimp with "PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: THE SUN IS KNOWN TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO CAUSE CANCER" to float up and down the state. Stupid proposition system.

  6. Re:California by nman64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It can be shown that 100% of cancer incidents reported in California affected patients in California. We must therefore warn you that California may cause cancer.

  7. Re:Becareful coke addicts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    stochastic just means random. it doesn't imply any particular type of distribution.

  8. Re:California by nman64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Careful, there. Being pedantic is known to the State of California to cause cancer.

  9. Re:Becareful coke addicts.. by VAElynx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um, what? Stochastic means random, with calculable probability. An example would be metal fatigue, given a probability density function for load stress - it's definitely stochastic, but it isn't proportional to the load to the first power, rather, something like to the power of four, never mind that below certain values, you don't get fatigue in steels at all.

  10. 4-methylimidazole by JazzHarper · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...is also present in dark beers and roasted foods. It is one of many substances, like acrylamide, formed during browning. So, even if they avoid it in cola drinks, we can expect California warning labels on more foods and beverages. (California OEHHA proposed slapping a warning label on everything containing acrylamide about five years ago, but they got a lot of pushback on that one).

  11. Re:California by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I moved to California 2 weeks ago for a temp job, and yes it's a strange place. My first indication: It was pouring-down rain, with almost no visiblity, and not a single Californian on the I-15 had their headlights turned on. I was literally driving blind (cause I couldn't see the other cars). I just slowed down & hoped I didn't hit anyone.

    Back home on the east coast everybody turns on their headlights when it rains so (1) they can see where they're going and (2) other drivers can see them. I guess Californians lack that basic common sense? So maybe Californians really DO need those labels on their cars to inform them of the obvious (cars pollute). LOL

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  12. Re:California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its California.. if the government doesn't turn on your headlights, clearly its because headlights consume power and thus are not green. Also, if safety was an issue, the government would've turned them on for you.

    Or.. they're broke and forgot to turn on the headlight management system.

  13. fuck the ABA, for the record... by nimbius · · Score: 5, Informative

    the American Beverage Association is a trade organization that represents the beverage industry in the United States. Its members include producers and bottlers of soft drinks, bottled water, and other non-alcoholic beverages.

    the American Beverage Association frankly has no idea at all if this chemical is hazardous, at what levels and under what conditions. they have published no known study. they have 25 lobbyists across seven firms and their purpose is to limit warning labels on their products regardless of the actual science.

    to clarify, The Center For Science in the Public Interest (we like them. theyre good guys) concluded 4-methylimidazole is added as a caramel coloring in some dark beers and soy sauces. its bad. to further cut past the knee jerk spinjob article from OP, heres the release from CSPI:
    http://www.cspinet.org/new/201102161.html
    and a quote out of the article as to what precisely theyre targeting...
    "Federal regulations distinguish among four types of caramel coloring, two of which are produced with ammonia and two without it. CSPI wants the Food and Drug Administration to prohibit the two made with ammonia. The type used in colas and other dark soft drinks is known as Caramel IV, or ammonia sulfite process caramel. Caramel III, which is produced with ammonia but not sulfites, is sometimes used in beer, soy sauce, and other foods. "

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  14. Re:California by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Virii" and "Priii" is what people like to type when they want to appear smart (using the Latin plural). The rest of us just type viruses and Priuses.

    Bah, the -us/-i variation is used in plain ol' English, too:

    asparagus, asparagi
    broccolus, broccoli
    spaghettus, spaghetti
    us, I

    Whoops, that last one is backwards...

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. Re:Might as well go all the way by magarity · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be funny until you got tired of it and landed. Then they'd sue you for taking down a warning sign.

  16. Re:California by xevioso · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't understand this. I can pick up a piece of asparagus.

    However, when I buy broccoli, at no point is my broccoli a broccolus. When I remove the rubber band, slice it up to steam it, any piece I pick up is still broccoli. So what constitutes a broccolus? The little polypy things on the end? If i hold up one of those, is that a broccolus or just a small piece of broccoli?

    I just don't understand.