Slashdot Mirror


'The Hobbit' Pub Threatened With Lawsuit

An anonymous reader writes "'The Hobbit,' a small pub in Southampton, England, has been threatened with a lawsuit by lawyers representing the Saul Zaentz Company in California. The pub, which has traded under the name for the last 20 years without incident, now faces closure if it does not change its name. It's yet another example of big business throwing its weight around to get its way. The pub's landlady said simply, 'I can't fight Hollywood.'"

51 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Easy! by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Change name to "The Halfling". Problem solved.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Easy! by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was going to suggest 'Fantasy Midget' but I think it would be erotically misleading.

    2. Re:Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're going to rename the bar "The Hobgoblin" you might as well just rename it to "Moe's".

    3. Re:Easy! by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not if his name is Bilbo. I know people that have been named after characters in the book.

      I think where the "problem" lies is that the name of the establishment is the name of the book which might possibly be putting it under trademark law which forces you to "protect it or lose it".

      It's still bullshit of course. Books are over 60-85 years old and the man has been dead since 73'. Copyrights are rather disgusting when abused like this. His children can go out and get their own fucking jobs and write their own fucking novels.

    4. Re:Easy! by rhook · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are they going to sue the dictionary too?

      hobbit (hbt)

      — n
      1. one of an imaginary race of half-size people living in holes
      2. a nickname used for a very small type of primitive human, Homo floresiensis , following the discovery of remains of eight such people on the Island of Flores, Indonesia, in 2004

    5. Re:Easy! by ShakaUVM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doctrine of Laches. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laches_%28equity%29)

      If this pub has been around for 20 years and they haven't sued them in this time, the pub could assert that the owners have slept on their rights, and that the delay in bringing the suit would cost them a lot of money.

    6. Re:Easy! by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If they had made a case against this pub 20 years ago when they first started using the name, they'd have a much stronger trademark case. Trademarks have always been in the vein of "you snooze, you lose". If you don't defend your trademark religiously, you can end up losing it entirely.

    7. Re:Easy! by justforgetme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AFAIK all the legal stuff broke out once JRR passed away. Pretty much much the classic story of heirs becoming idiots.

      --
      -- no sig today
    8. Re:Easy! by Fjandr · · Score: 4, Informative

      You most certainly can trademark a person's name, and it can be very commercial. If you are named such (and not the person holding the trademark), you can be legally prevented from using your own name in branding if it covers an industry in which another has registered it as a trademark.

    9. Re:Easy! by Fjandr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately, Hollywood has two major advantages:

      1) Lots of money for lawyers.
      2) It's the UK legal system.

    10. Re:Easy! by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not idiots. Not at all. Greedy is what they are.

    11. Re:Easy! by root_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then just rename it 'The Hobbit (book) - For other uses, see Hobbit (disambiguation)'. :^)

      --
      [--- PGP key and more on http://www.root42.de ---]
    12. Re:Easy! by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, isn't it clear that this pub will reduce their income from Tolkien IP? If you have the choice between going to a "hobbit" pub or renting the movie, surely you'll go for the pub? It's only natural that they're defending their interests. Ie everybody starts opening hobbit pubs everywhere, nobody will buy the books or movies anymore. Hell, if you can read the word "hobbit" on the pub for free, why would you pay to read the book? Makes perfect sense to me. In fact, all references to anything Tolkien-related should be banned everywhere. It all just detracts from the value of the IP.

    13. Re:Easy! by julesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, Hollywood has two major advantages:

      1) Lots of money for lawyers.
      2) It's the UK legal system.

      Actually, the UK legal system isn't very friendly to hollywood in this case. They would almost certainly lose if the case came to court (trademarks only work where somebody is likely to think the use of the name implies some kind of actual relationship between the two businesses, which nobody rational would in this case), and that means they would have to pay the Hobbit's legal expenses as well as their own. Because this is a likely outcome, the owners of the Hobbit are likely to be able to find a lawyer who will represent them on a conditional fee arrangement (i.e. they pay nothing, hollywood pays when they win).

      (This is not legal advice.)

    14. Re:Easy! by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pub has clear risk of losing as the whole thing is Tolkien/movie themed. Without approval by the rights holder. It's not just the name.

    15. Re:Easy! by Troyusrex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is more complicated than that. Companies that don't pursue any infringement they find out about vigorously often end up losing their trademark. This leads to these silly types of cases where the company doesn't really care that some small pub somewhere is using its trademark but if they don't come down hard on them the fact that they knew about it and didn't vigorously defend their trademark could cause them to lose a trademark decision against someone they do care about. Don't blame the company, blame the law that forces companies to act this way or risk losing their trademarks.

    16. Re:Easy! by zxsqkty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or they could just extradite the landlady and try her in California. That's how it works, isn't it?

      --
      Caution: May contain nuts.
  2. Ok. What about this?. by bdwoolman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Habit.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  3. Rename it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The "Fuck you Hollywood"

  4. Lend them your support! by el3mentary · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    1. Re:Lend them your support! by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's a student pub- I'd expect no less.

      Nice place too. They do these great cocktails in a pint glass named after LOTR characters- The Frodo, The Gollum, The Legolas, etc. The kind of filth-in-a-glass that only a student would find appealing, but great fun.

      Although that probably doesn't do their trademark infringement case much good, come to think of it...

    2. Re:Lend them your support! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just to nitpick, @savethehobbit is a Twitter account. A hashtag using the pound sign like so: #SaveTheHobbit

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. Re:Simple solution by a_nonamiss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Terminate and Stay Resident? Am I increasing or decreasing my geek cred when I admit that's the only TSR I know?

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  6. Re:Simple solution by Reilaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dungeons and Dragons before it was bought by Wizards of the Coast.

  7. Re:Zieg Heil! by msobkow · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's an American company doing the suing.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  8. Then Hasbro would sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Name it the Ten-Forward Lord Smoked Meat and Fish's Leaky Cauldron Pub and Mos Eisley Cantina of the Vulgar Unicorn.

    With all the lawsuit Publicity, you'll never close. Throw in a walk-down like Cheers and a surly endangered animal smuggling bartender named Moe, and the lawyers will be your best patrons.

  9. The Pub isn't all innocent by Necroman · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at their website, you'll see they use likenesses of the characters from the movies in their advertising. If the pub was just using fan artwork or coming up with their own graphical material (while using the names), they may have been left alone. But they are using the faces from the movie in their own advertising and promotional material (posters, loyalty card). That's just asking for trouble.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
    1. Re:The Pub isn't all innocent by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah it's hard to see them as being innocent victims when they're using images from the movies in their promotional flyers, etc.... That is just inviting trouble.

    2. Re:The Pub isn't all innocent by Pennidren · · Score: 3

      Yes it is difficult to see 'em as embodying blameless unfortunates when they are using pictures from the films in their publicity literature, et al... That is just welcoming trouble.

    3. Re:The Pub isn't all innocent by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Verily 'tis tough to vision the owners as hapless, guiltless martyrs as they use visual reproductions from the features in their marketing materials ans stuff... that is only leaving the door open to conflict.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  10. I'd be ok with the lawyers... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....if nine of them showed up to the pub dressed as Nazgul.

  11. Re:Zieg Heil! by pthisis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interestingly, the original edition of the Lord of the Rings is in the public domain in the US due to an error by his publisher at the time. Tolkien had to go back and make a revised edition and market it with a note on the back pleading with fans not to buy the Ace Books edition that he saw no royalties from. So presumably a similar pub in the US (e.g. Bilbo Baggins, in Alexandria, VA) is on safer ground than this one in the UK.

    --
    rage, rage against the dying of the light
  12. Long history by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mr. Saul Zaentz has a long history of being a dick. Zaentz sued Creedence Clearwater's John Fogerty for plagiarizing himself (!) asking $140 million in damages, and lost.

    Zaentz's perception is that he owns the 'brand' Hobbit, although he only owns screen rights.

  13. Re:Zieg Heil! by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Informative

    If your idea of Nazi style jackbooted fascism is a bar being sued because they use direct images from the LotR movies in their advertising, then you're pretty well off, and really don't understand what the people that were actually exposed to fascist tyranny actually had to put up with.

  14. Re:Zieg Heil! by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd imagine most of their 20 years went by just fine because they weren't using movie stills in their advertising and promotional material on their public website..

    http://www.thehobbitpub.co.uk/

  15. Can't fight Hollywood by brentrad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course they can't fight Hollywood, since they've been using stills from the movies in their advertising. Take a look at their website, that's obviously a photograph of Elijah Wood from the LOTR movies on their "One Card To Bind Them All" loyalty card:

    http://www.hobbitpub.co.uk/drink-offers/

    They're not fighting Hollywood since they don't have a leg to stand on. If they would have used original artwork instead of copyrighted images from a movie, I'd be on their side.

  16. Doesn't this qualify as... by MrKevvy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Shire Art?

    /ducks

    --
    -- Insert witty one-liner here. --
  17. Re:Zieg Heil! by shentino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It holds all the water the lawyers can carry.

    This case is not about the merits.

    It's about a poor defenseless woman being outgunned in the legal arena and losing the case before it even starts because she's too broke to fight back.

  18. Re:Call it the Bobbit by digitig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or they could pick a random name from the Völuspá, which is public domain. "Gandalf's", perhaps.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  19. Re:Zieg Heil! by Genda · · Score: 4, Informative

    A bit of information friend... since we became a nation of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation... the government/corporations (they've effectively become one and the same) and the nations people are no longer on speaking terms. Americans are way more pissed off than you ever will be, because our corporations crap on the world weekly but they defecate on us here in the states every few seconds. Please feel free to club a CEO or two. You'll win friends and garner respect here in the states.

  20. Re:Really? by Nursie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While it does seem that way, think on this -

    The Hobbit was published in 1937. Under life +70 copyright, it doesn't enter the public domain for another 30 years. This is ludicrous. 75 years after publishing, this stuff is part of our culture and should be free for all.

    (Yes, I used to drink at this pub!)

  21. Re:One of my local's by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, your snarky, self-righteous dismissal might come off as marginally less douchy if this guy wasn't some dickhead film producer who had fuck-all to do with the "success and work" of Tolkien.

    It might, but I doubt it.

  22. Pull an H by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And put up an apostrophe, it will be pronounced the same in cockney.
    the `obbit

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Pull an H by Custard+Horse · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is next to Scotland and London isn't it? Stratford, where Shakespeare came from, is in London is it not? The UK is such a small country - who can say where these places are - there is literally no way to clarify...

      I'm from the UK by the way, before anybody mistakes me for my cousins across the pond.

    2. Re:Pull an H by Avoiderman · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I would have expected someone from the UK to get the sarcasm.

  23. Vague by flimflammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I felt sorry for this pub until I actually went to the website. The summary would have you believe the big guys are trying to crush the little guys over a little innocent naming. Not so-- Visiting the website will immediately welcome you with faces and figures from the films, trademark and copyright infringement everywhere.

    I don't feel sorry for a pub that is trying to leech from the popularity of the source material and the films. Maybe it didn't start out that way, but that's what it appears to be now.

    1. Re:Vague by Nursie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It didn't start that way, the pub was there, using that name, long before the movies.

      I agree it's dumb/wrong of them to use film promo stuff on their flyers, however that's not what this suit is about (AFACIT), and the guy suing doesn't own any of that stuff. It is the name.

      I am biased because I used to live near there and drink there, it's a good place, and I think that the name should stay - The Hobbit was released in 1937 and is part of our culture now, it should be free for all to use. OTOH they definitely ought to cut that shit out with the flyers and use of film materials, assuming they don't have permission from whoever does own the copyright on those images, which is a pretty safe assumption to make.

  24. Blame the web designer by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did you see that tiny little text at the bottom of the site? It reads:

    Site designed and built by frozendesigns.co.uk

    Perhaps the pub should be raising some hell with them. Specifically on why they don't seem to understand the concept of building web sites using only original and/or royalty free images.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  25. Re:Simple solution by Snufu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your geek cred remains unadjusted. But your "Get off my lawn" cred shot through the ceiling.

  26. Re:Zieg Heil! by alienzed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thanks for that, all this time I was thinking:"Big bully Hollywood using lawyers for no good." Then I went to the site, that sort of looks like a Lord of the Rings fan club and thought:"Ah, shameless copyright infringement, nevermind."

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  27. Re:Almost a good point by julesh · · Score: 3, Informative

    But "Whosover files first wins", in trademark law.

    Erm, no. Usage prior to registration is a defence against trademark infrinement, at least in the UK. http://www.inbrief.co.uk/intellectual-property/defences-to-trademark-infringement.htm