New Samsung TV Watches You Watching It
CanHasDIY writes "Straight out of 1984, Samsung has unveiled a new series of televisions with integrated cameras and microphones, complete with facial and voice recognition software. Best of all, there appears to be no physical indication of the mic and camera's status, so consumers have no way of knowing when they're being monitored, or by whom... and if you don't find the idea of a TV that watches you creepy enough, apparently Samsung's Terms of Service include a clause allowing third-party apps to make use of the monitoring system, and use the data gathered for their own purposes. Nothing Orwellian about that..."
Look guys, it's just too easy.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
Can't be. I don't recall reading about Apple releasing a television set that watches you while you watch it.
Omnipresent surveillance is inevitable, and will change society dramatically. The question what we choose to do with it.
I'd just put duct tape over the lens, or better yet, open the thing up and snip the wires going to the mic and camera(s)
The warranty would go bye-bye but my privacy doesn't.
What about Max Headroom?
.....which were provided to Pennsylvanian teens, and had integrated cameras, but there was no indication to the users that they were being recorded in their bedrooms (by the government).
My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
The webcam on my laptop has an LED light up when powered on. This TV lacks such an indicator.
Best of all, there appears to be no physical indication of the mic and camera's status, so consumers have no way of knowing when they're being monitored, or by whom... and if you don't find the idea of a TV that watches you creepy enough, apparently Samsung's Terms of Service include a clause allowing third-party apps to make use of the monitoring system, and use the data gathered for their own purposes.
Did you somehow manage to miss that part of the summary? It's only most of the summary, after all. In short, there's plenty to see here, only it's third parties doing the seeing, and you apparently don't get any say in when they do the seeing, or what they use the footage for.
Write failed: Broken pipe
1.) rig a secondary/tertiary monitor output on a nearby desktop and wire it to the TV's camera/audio input.
2.) set the computer output to a nonstop 24/7 loop of "Friday" by Rebecca Black, along with a slide show that alternates between Goatse, 2 girls 1 cup, and horse porn.
3.) bask in the fact that somwhere, someone is regretting the release of this technology.
4.) Don't EVER cross the wires from step 1.
5.) Profit.
I'll go out on a limb here and say:
This TV is going to end up capturing so much footage of bored men fapping to porn.
I like big butts and I cannot lie.
It's simply convergence. Think of the television as a large smartphone. In the near future when you sit down at the Christmas feast you will be able to share with friends and family in far flung places. You'll be able to attend meetings and interact at lectures. You can already do this at your pc? Then you already understand, just think of interacting in the lounge-room rather than the basement. The television is just an oversized monitor now, it's just getting incrementally smarter (and bigger).
Need to see a doctor or receive post-hospital care at home? Your internet connect television/ip phone allows this to happen in your home. You will be able to plug your auxiliary medical kit into the usb slot and your practitioner will see your vital signs directly.
It's Jetsons but sadly without the flying car.
The television has become the focal point of media in the home. Making it the communication device as well is a very simple step in the digital age.
I don't know about you, but I have a TV on my dresser and it gives me a great view from my bed. I know from experience (and from mirrored closet doors) that the view back is pretty god damn fantastic too. Not sure I want most strangers to see all that, though. Just the special ones.
Rest assured that we don't want to see it either.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
I think it would be preferable if they were competing with NSA/CIA/DHS/etc... at least then whatever methods they (Samsung, et al) used to spy on you wouldn't be as useful to the former groups.
Given most "Smart" TV's have WiFi and/or Bluetooth, it's like Google LivingRoomView, BedroomView, ShitterView... just drive around with the right transceivers, SWAT will probably have access too.
If this thing videos some teenagers screwing, will employees of the company be prosecuted under child porn laws? Will the teenagers be arrested for making child porn?
It's nothing that hasn't been done before.
An always on camera in your living room that records everything send the stream to samsung has been done before?
When? Where?
If you're so afraid about TVs becoming more advanced, then why not be so scared about cell phones,
I vaguely recall NSA wiretapping our phone calls was something of an issue for a lot of people...
game consoles, iPods and the like?
Because the game consoles and ipods:
a) have indicators when they are recording
b) don't stream that data back to the mothership
Sure they have the -potential- too, but the difference here is that samsung actually -is- streaming the data out.
Besides it's not like these companies have all of the staff and resources necessary to watch and monitor the thousands to millions of TV users all at once.
All it takes is one creep set-hopping from living room to living room...
They don't need to be everywhere at once to be beyond creepy.
Or somehow different than your microphone and webcam featured laptop? iPad anyone? Oh that's right, whenever an App has access to your cam a little light blinks to let you know.
Whew. Glad that's settled.
Nothing a roll of duct tape couldn't fix.... or a soldering iron.
Duct tape over the camera and solder the output lines for a cassette deck... err mp3 player... to the mice in on the tv... play porn music on a loop...
A related sci-fi book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Light_of_Other_Days "The Light of Other Days is a 2000 science fiction novel written by Stephen Baxter based on a synopsis by Arthur C. Clarke, which explores the development of wormhole technology to the point where information can be passed instantaneously between points in the space-time continuum. ... The novel examines the philosophical issues that arise from the world's population (increasingly suffering from ecological and political disturbances) being aware that they could be under constant observation by anyone, or that they could observe anyone without their knowledge. ..."
There are a couple other similar sci-fi stories as well, including one about "Slow Glass" by Bob Shaw with the same name as that novel.
http://strick.net/blog/041103.html
And one about a similar time viewer (I forget the name).
A good thing to keep in mind is, just because we can do something, does not mean we should.
http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2009/02/11/solid-development-principles-in-motivational-pictures/
http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/files/2011/03/SingleResponsibilityPrinciple2_71060858.jpg
What kind of word do we want to live in, and what kind of world do we want for our children, and children's children, and so on, for seven or more generations?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_generation_sustainability
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
It's like this:
You watch the TV.
The TV watches you watching the TV.
Some ad agency flunky watches the TV watching you watch the TV.
His monitor watches him watch the TV watching you watch the TV.
His supervisor watches the monitor watching him watch the TV watching you watch the TV.
Turtles all the way down.
But are you sure that LED is not controlled by software (drivers)? Because otherwise, someone with control over the OS could disable that feature and record unannounced, while giving you a false sense of security.
Paranoia ftw.
Dilbert RSS feed
The television has detected more persons in the room than this content is licensed for.
Please reduce the number of persons in the room, or press the RED button to authorise a payment of a $X per additional person in the room.
Nothing a roll of duct tape couldn't fix.....
Isn't that true for most things in life?
Not to mention the contemplative souls who think it's their god given right to stop*right* at the top of the escalator, suddenly struck by a compulsive need to understand their role in the universe. Ditto for those thoughtful folks who park their carts in the middle of grocery aisle while they weigh the relative merits of "chunky soup" vs. "minestrone"
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
That won't work, because they will make possession of duct tape a felony.
A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
Please explain to me why not having an indicator light is significant. The manufacturer controls how the entire thing is built, so it could also easily build in a function to use the camera but without making any status light come on. As I type this the status light of the camera in my Lenovo laptop is off.. But is the camera off, really?
Bit of a silly article. If you don't like web cams (or any camera) then just say so. Makes no sense to fully trust Logitech but not Samsung or anyone else.
Encore for the tinfoilers: every iPhone comes with one or two cameras. And you really don't know about the software that runs it.
Next.