Slashdot Mirror


New Samsung TV Watches You Watching It

CanHasDIY writes "Straight out of 1984, Samsung has unveiled a new series of televisions with integrated cameras and microphones, complete with facial and voice recognition software. Best of all, there appears to be no physical indication of the mic and camera's status, so consumers have no way of knowing when they're being monitored, or by whom... and if you don't find the idea of a TV that watches you creepy enough, apparently Samsung's Terms of Service include a clause allowing third-party apps to make use of the monitoring system, and use the data gathered for their own purposes. Nothing Orwellian about that..."

233 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Soviet Russia jokes overload by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look guys, it's just too easy.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet America, TV watches you.

    2. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Nugoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not only too easy, it's one of Yakov Smirnoff's actual jokes.

      --
      I explicitly release the above into the public domain.
    3. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Look guys, it's just too easy.

      'Biker!' screamed the shrewish voice from the telescreen. '1066130 Blind Biker! Yes, you! Post faster, please!'

      A sudden hot sweat had broken out all over Biker's body. His face remained completely inscrutable. Never show dismay! Never show resentment! A single click of the mouse could give you away. He stood watching while the moderator raised her cursor above his post and -- one could not say gracefully, but with remarkable neatness and efficiency -- clicked the +1, Funny button.

      'There, citizens! That's how I want to see you doing it. Watch me again. I've got thirty-nine tabs open and I've got four alts. Now look.' She made another post. 'You see my keyboard isn't crufty. You can all do it if you want to," she added as she clicked on another post. 'Anyone with under forty-five tabs open is perfectly capable of getting a solid first post. We don't all have the privilege of fighting in the front line, but at least we can all keep fit. Remember our boys in the Chans! And the screening bots in the NSA datacenters! Just think what they have to put up with. Now try again. That's better, comrade, that's much better,' she added encouragingly as Biker, with a violent lunge, succeeded in achieving a (+5, Funny) on a first post, for the first time in several years.

      - Anonymous Coward, 2012

    4. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our Soviet Russia jokes overload...

      Wait, what?

    5. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by ratnerstar · · Score: 1

      The hard part is making the Nietzsche jokes.

      --
      Just because you sold your soul to the devil that needn't make you a teetotaler. --The Devil and Daniel Webster
    6. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy; but actually deeply misleading...

      If there is a lesson of the various socialist surveillance dystopias, it is that unaided state surveillance is too expensive to survive(y hello thar, East Germany) and tends to stifle out of fear the new technologies that would ultimately help it prosper(rather like the MPAA...)

      In good old free world, on the other hand, technological development and the enthusiastic forces of private enterprise produce all the groundwork needed for surveillance and control of the sort that the Evil Empire could only dream of, just waiting to be subpeonaed when needed...

    7. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by tqk · · Score: 1

      The hard part is making the Nietzsche jokes.

      There was nothing about Nietzche that was funny. Well, okay, "The Anti-Christ" is pretty much the best send up of Xtianity that I've read so far.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by flyneye · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia we watch T.V. but is not on. Electricity ration for party members only.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    9. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by flyneye · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia we laugh at Nietzsche and co-op his thread.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      In capitalist Russia, Yakov Smirnoff sues you for copyright infringement!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but there's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya 'bout the raisin' of the wrist.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, damned if you do, damned if you don't... but with one of them you get 60" HD TV's and free wifi?

    13. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Roachie · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia I Yack ON Smirnoff!

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    14. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it is that unaided state surveillance is too expensive to survive(y hello thar, East Germany) and tends to stifle out of fear the new technologies that would ultimately help it prosper(rather like the MPAA...)

      Couple of things.

      1) Cameras are a lot cheaper now.

      2) East Germans weren't primarily afraid of the Stasi. They were afraid of their own neighbors. The surveillance state successfully co-opted the populace into doing its grunt work for free. That part hasn't changed, and won't, because at the end of the day, people are finks.

      So, yes, unaided state surveillance may be too expensive to be feasible... but it wasn't, and won't, be unaided.

    15. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is (extrapolated of course) is that communism is doomed to fail, and that fascism/corporatocracy is the inevitable result of unbridled capitalism?

      You don't say! :D Though I think you just managed to eloquently summarize why historically and presently this idea seems true.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    16. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by morphotomy · · Score: 1

      The hard part is making Nietzsche jokes that don't have terrifying implications in the real world. Like the Daily Show.

    17. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. Wasn't it Nietzsche who said "that which doesn't kill me makes me stronger"? Tell that to someone with brain damage and two missing arms from an auto wreck.

      Nietzsche is way over rated IMO.

    18. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by readin · · Score: 1

      Fascism/corporatocracy is the inevitable result of people demanding that bridles be created for the good of the people. The corporations/government recognize the power of the bridles to control their competitors and then seize the bridles for their own use.

      Without bridles, corporations compete for your favor so you'll purchase their products. With the introduction of bridles, the corporations compete for the favor of the senators/congressmen/presidents who control the bridles so that you'll have to purchase their products.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    19. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I think we agree much in the same way wild horses are tamed: How does one control the uncontrolled? Build a better bridle. Salt licks for everyone is unscalable.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    20. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of the piece from the UK show Black Mirror, when the ads on TV are mandatory for people to watch, and you are financialy penalised if you cover your eyes or look away.
      Life imitates art?

    21. Re:Soviet Russia jokes overload by davydagger · · Score: 1

      yes and no. the stasi was numerically the largest secret police with well over 300,000 members. There was a very real cost, and a very large amount of them(they cost money). Without such numbers control might have been impossible. Compare that with 30,000 (1/10 that) of Nazi Gestapo who did an equally effectively frightening job with the same results. Then we have today. state survialliance is cheaper, especially when the cameras are being installed anyway by private companies marketing them as a postive good. Various other institutions install cameras its just a matter of the government co-opting them when they need them, very little actual cost.

  2. Samsung, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't be. I don't recall reading about Apple releasing a television set that watches you while you watch it.

    1. Re:Samsung, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      i just laughed so hard milk came out of my nose... and I wasn't even drinking milk.

    2. Re:Samsung, huh? by ichthus · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! You have to go to the doctor..

      --
      sig: sauer
    3. Re:Samsung, huh? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Your sentence is somewhat unclear.
      Did you mean "i just laughed, so hard milk came out of my nose... "?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    4. Re:Samsung, huh? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Union, apple watches you, has worm.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:Samsung, huh? by user+flynn · · Score: 1

      I suppose it's time to get out of the pr0n business.

          and I think they did mean "so hard milk came out of my nose...".

      --
      In the distance you hear an ominous moo.
    6. Re:Samsung, huh? by Tastecicles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      that's the point - if you're not in front of the zombie box, soaking up TOWIE/BGT/Eastenders/whateverothershiteisonthesedays, then it is assumed that you're up to no good. Ergo, you be fucked.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    7. Re:Samsung, huh? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I would have expected this from Sony. Only Sony customers would put up with something like that. Before you mod me down, remember XCP, OtherOS, and customer CC info in plain text on insecure, internet-facing computers.

      But Samsung? Guess they'll go in my "never buy from them" list, too. Never give money to someone who refuses to show respect and gratitude.

    8. Re:Samsung, huh? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      > No, but maybe they're copying Apple TV and "improving" on it.

      It's worse than that. They're copying Apple before Apple patents it.

      That's pre-patent infringement. A form of pre-crime.

      The punishment for pre-patent infringement should be much worse than ordinary patent infringement.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. Omnipresent Surveillance by mhajicek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Omnipresent surveillance is inevitable, and will change society dramatically. The question what we choose to do with it.

    1. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I choose to reject it. Not easy, but it can be done.

    2. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Omnipresent surveillance is inevitable, and will change society dramatically. The question what we choose to do with it.

      I for one welcome our new blurred, jizz covered lens reverse TV watching overlords!

    3. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Omnipresent surveillance is inevitable...

      Says who? This might be true in public (but only if its uses don't upset the masses). It will never be true in my house.

      2. ...will change society dramatically.

      Vague. Meaningless. Probably untrue.

      3. The question what we choose to do with it.

      We already know what we will do with it. What we've done with "it" throughout history. Use it crush human nature until humans get sick of it and start slaughtering each other. Then we'll use it for decent uses and people will look back and be shocked by our ignorance and brutality.

    4. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This isn't surveillance it's just a fucking feature. Just don't plug your TV to the internet it's not hard.

    5. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Common response: "If you're not breaking the law, why wouldn't you let the cops search your car? (Or track you with cameras?) (Or record all your internet actions?)" -- It's amazing how easily americans are to give up their freedom to the government tyrants.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Crikey, is that what happened with regular TV?

    7. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the best answer is always "to protect others whose freedom of political and spiritual expression is threatened by your actions". Always.

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    8. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      This, or disable them. Snip a wire or two, cut a solder trace, it's probably not tough. In fact, covering the ports with electrical tape would disable the camera completely, and most likely impair the microphone to a great degree.

    9. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh hush. It's very easy.

      50 cent roll of electrical tape. Cut a 3x3cm square using scissors. Place it over the camera aperature.

      1$ bottle of superglue. The watery runny kind that whicks up into paper, and has a long neck applicator. Lay the television temporarily on a soft, cushioned surface face up, say, on the sofa. Into the microphone grill, gently dribble the runny superglue. Leave in this position for 2 to 3 hours for maximal cone set. Return television to the entertainment center, and feel marginally safer.

      The first one is obvious how it works, but the second helps prevent the vibrational movement of the microphone pickup, greatly reducing its sensitivity. Sufficiently glued so that the cone can't move the coil, or the piezo crystal can't be flexed, and you have basically neutered it without opening the system unit.

      These little steps are not hard at all. The hard part is staunchly refusing to buy such an intrusive Little whore of a gadget in the first place, as the powers that be all try like mad to get you to swallow that shit pill, and telescreen sensors become standard features.

      Shit like this is why I refuse to buy stuff like the kinect. While you can unplug the ethernet cable on your console to ensure the thought police and social services don't see you spanking junior on candid camera, (with audio and motion tracking!), the act of buying an obvious spying device and installing it in your home tells fucked up marketing assholes that you want MOAR spying. I don't want to send that message.

    10. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Master+Moose · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is, by bypassing the "feature" you are still paying for it, which will encourage Samgsung and other TV makers to continue to inculde it.

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    11. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by tqk · · Score: 1

      I choose to reject it. Not easy, but it can be done.

      I just had a vision of Elvis Presley pulling out a gun and shooting his TV. I assume it was a scene from a movie I once saw.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    12. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      A couple back room deals, and this becomes very difficult.

      Your standard coaxial cable hookup doubles as a physical layer support for ethernet. Just takes a clandestine cable modem being integrated into the box to report back for "quality assurance", and you have a connection that cannot be "unplugged" unless you want to ditch your cable provider, or attach a frequency scrubber in-line before the TV. (Potentially eliminating your ability to use PPV, remote DVR, etc.)

      Trust me, if this kind of shit gets pushed, "unplug the internet!" Won't be so easy to do while using the TV as intended.

    13. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Oooh. Gooooood answer. 10/10.

    14. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Re: It will never be true in my house.
      Depends who is giving you your computer, device or job?
      A school can network to your home with little public comment about camera use
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District
      The background paperwork once needed for high risk, cleared work is now becoming normal
      http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/job-applicants-asked-turn-facebook-passwords-article-1.1047427
      Then you have the CIA hinting at the joy of a fully networked US home
      http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/03/petraeus-tv-remote/

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rejecting bullshit like that is about as easy as rejecting 3D televisions and cable TV. Practically no effort at all....

    16. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      actually, it's even easier. Leave the entire TV in its box. In the shop.

    17. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by CaptainLugnuts · · Score: 1

      You do realize this TV is advertised as being Skype enabled? Why would spend the money to get those features then disable it?

    18. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The will just iPad it, you want a fun tv, you will sign in once- they get your face, modem details (mac), sync it with your bookmarks, browser, cookies.
      After you have set up the language, network, colour, sent data back you might get the option to unplug your TV from the network.
      Until then your stuck in setup ;)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    19. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Possibly you saw this movie:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYJ5vbSt9K0
      Or the itchy and scratchy episode that made a mockery of it.

      It has probably occured numerous times, due to the fact that it was one of Elvis' hobbies:
      http://www.elvisinfonet.com/elvisgoulet.html

      My favourite quote on the topic:

      “There was nothing Elvis had against Robert Goulet. They were friends,” Kern said. “But Elvis just shot out things on a random basis.”
      There were no reports Presley hurt anybody with his gun slinging, but he was known to have a fascination with firearms. He converted part of a rear building at the estate into a firing range.

    20. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      That costs more than 1.50$

    21. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because you don't want those "features", but all the other HDTV makers jumped on the bandwagon too, and you simply can't find a non-bugged set?

      That's how this kind of thing becomes ubiquitous you know.

    22. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Trivially hack into the data stream and stick it on the web ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    23. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      In my case, no cable TV would mean moving to a different place. Hardly no effort at all.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    24. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      but doesn't this make you a larger target, because they presume you have something to hide, why else would you go to that extent. What you could do is to mount a lcd video of a retirement home survailence camera in front of it, and have a pizeo speaker that plays some classical music station .

      And then the RIAA gets you for re-broadcasting the classical music.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    25. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Even better, have it work over the cellular network. It's feasible to have a TV that doesn't hook up to the cable system (satellite TV, Free OTA, etc), but most people live in an area that is accessible by some form of cellular service. As long as the thought police could log into you TV and watch and listen to you (even at low quality) they can do their job. Unless you don't buy a TV (another reason for you to be a suspect) or make your house a faraday cage, then they basically have access to your house.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    26. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by godel_56 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh hush. It's very easy.

      50 cent roll of electrical tape. Cut a 3x3cm square using scissors. Place it over the camera aperature.

      1$ bottle of superglue. The watery runny kind that whicks up into paper, and has a long neck applicator. Lay the television temporarily on a soft, cushioned surface face up, say, on the sofa. Into the microphone grill, gently dribble the runny superglue. Leave in this position for 2 to 3 hours for maximal cone set. Return television to the entertainment center, and feel marginally safer.

      >

      Ooops. yo've just invalidated your warranty

      From TFA Samsung says:

      Samsung assumes no responsibility, and shall not be liable, in connection with whether any such products or services will be appropriate, functional or supported for the Samsung products or services available in your country.

      and

      Want to read the owner’s manual for your new Samsung TV? This is accomplished by download, as Samsung stopped including printed owner’s manuals at least two years ago. However, before you may download the manual, you must first agree to the following online statement: Samsung assumes no responsibility, and shall not be liable, in connection with whether any such products or services will be appropriate, functional or supported for the Samsung products or services available in your country.

      In Australia, not only would these statements not have any legal standing, I suspect one or both may actually be in violation of consumer protection laws.

    27. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by EdIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure it is no effort at all.

      Just don't have any form of traditional television that is ridiculously super expensive and run by assholes that *think* they can control the distribution.

      I have Netflix and torrents. Recently, I started doing the torrents again for some TV instead of waiting for the DVD releases which have no overlay advertisements of any kind. The new webrip torrents are awesome. No commercials, and all those annoying overlays are history.

      Before you say it is pirating, that is merely a point of view, not a fact. Anything they broadcast into my home is something I can store or obtain in any means I want. They made it free when they put it in my home without my consent, and without my ability to block it. They don't want me to have it? Stop broadcasting it into my house.

      Issues of piracy aside, with RSS feeds, seedboxes, and automated processes I have something much better than cable television. So much better. At worst, it is about a 3-6 hour delay from broadcast television.

    28. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by geekoid · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, torrent aren't run by assholes that think they can control the distribution~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by EdIII · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, torrent aren't run by assholes that think they can control the distribution~

      Not sure what you mean, but no they are not run by assholes who think they can control the distribution.

      It's about the most free market you can get. Nobody controls distribution and the moment you don't deliver what people want you become irrelevant and the next person comes along and provides what people want.

    30. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      If the AU govt keeps on the track they are at emulating the US, its only a matter of time before you get stuffed with "binding arbitration", and abusive EULAs like we are, and which consumer protection laws prohibiting such shennanigans only apply to SMALL business.

      As for voiding the warantee.... who said my desire to avoid opening the case was to avoid voiding the warantee? I just wanted to avoid damaging the set on accident, and to minimize aesthetic marring.

      This kind of FUCK YOU mod is on par with a custom firmware flash, which you might as well do to this invasive little whore of a set as well, just to be sure.

    31. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Just don't have any form of traditional television that is ridiculously super expensive and run by assholes that *think* they can control the distribution.

      The point is, I would have to pay the cable fee even if I would not have a TV at all. The only way to not pay it is to move out.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    32. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by tqk · · Score: 1

      We already know what we will do with it. What we've done with "it" throughout history. Use it [to] crush human nature until humans get sick of it and start slaughtering each other. Then we'll use it for decent uses and people will look back and be shocked by our ignorance and brutality.

      Now that's a depressing thought, not that I disagree. V-1s and V-2s lead to the Apollo program and got Neill on the Moon.

      Just remember, just because you have a bomb, doesn't mean you have to use it. "Withdrawal is the better part of valour" I think is the way the saying goes.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    33. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Ohh. You are in one of those places.

      Yeah, I understand. I pay a cable fee right now whether I like it or not. While I just consider it a living expense, it does annoy the living shit out me that those bastards are getting the money. They even tried to double charge me until I had a conniption fit and told them the property management was picking up the tab and I was not paying for shit.

      I don't really have a place to move either. Where I live now is the best place within 10 miles of where I work. My only option is saving enough money to move out into a house *again*. Already lost several houses with the economy, so I am still dealing with that.

      So while I pay for cable TV, I don't use it at all. Can't stand it.

    34. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      The question what we choose to do with bit.

      I'm thinking corporate espionage. If I were a company competing on a global scale, I'd pay to view every feed from every television they had. One of them is bound to be in a board room somewhere. Oh the information that could be had.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    35. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      Taping over the camera will work until they introduce an energy saving "feature" that turns off the screen when it doesn't detect anyone watching it.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    36. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      Oh hush. It's very easy.

      50 cent roll of electrical tape. Cut a 3x3cm square using scissors. Place it over the camera aperature.

      1$ bottle of superglue. The watery runny kind that whicks up into paper, and has a long neck applicator. Lay the television temporarily on a soft, cushioned surface face up, say, on the sofa. Into the microphone grill, gently dribble the runny superglue. Leave in this position for 2 to 3 hours for maximal cone set. Return television to the entertainment center, and feel marginally safer.

      The first one is obvious how it works, but the second helps prevent the vibrational movement of the microphone pickup, greatly reducing its sensitivity. Sufficiently glued so that the cone can't move the coil, or the piezo crystal can't be flexed, and you have basically neutered it without opening the system unit.

      These little steps are not hard at all. The hard part is staunchly refusing to buy such an intrusive Little whore of a gadget in the first place, as the powers that be all try like mad to get you to swallow that shit pill, and telescreen sensors become standard features.

      Shit like this is why I refuse to buy stuff like the kinect. While you can unplug the ethernet cable on your console to ensure the thought police and social services don't see you spanking junior on candid camera, (with audio and motion tracking!), the act of buying an obvious spying device and installing it in your home tells fucked up marketing assholes that you want MOAR spying. I don't want to send that message.

      Or... just don't by a Samsung tv maybe? I'm thinking this might be the simpler option.

    37. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      At which time, its time to reflash the firmware, use nail polish remover on a qtip/sandpaper to mar up the receptical/lens of the camera, or some other "gotcha!" Technique.

      A marred up lens will still detect light levels, and avoiding shutting off the screen. It will also make whoever is trying to spy see a shapeless blur, which no amount of digital filtering will fix.

    38. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by thereitis · · Score: 1

      It's only a big deal now because only a minority are caught doing stupid things on camera. Once everyone is caught doing stupid things regularly, say a few generations from now, my guess is people will stop caring. "Senator Crenshaw dances around his house naked wearing bunny slippers? Meh."

    39. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      Instead of electrical tape, just use a frosted magic mending tape. Light can still get through, but no image.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    40. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      You already sort of responded to yourself there. Don't need to go to all the trouble of supergluing microphones, just don't buy the damn TV.

      Samsung make nice TVs though, I'm sure there's still a model without big brother built in.

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    41. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by anomaly256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then start up a new bug-less brand and make a LOT of noise about the fact that /your/ TVs aren't watching your children watch saturday morning cartoons in their underwear and streaming it over the internet. You will rake it in hand over fist

    42. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      fix: play some KLF. RIAA can't fuckin' touch you for that one!

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    43. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      fix: menu->power settings->disable motion detection.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    44. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      don't Samsung make most LCD panels in existence these days?

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    45. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Without probable cause they have no right to search your car.

      Period.

      So ask them what cause they have to search. Record their answer.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    46. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      And yet, totally ineffective against the mind control waves the TV emits on the frequencies that Google just bought from the *government*. Here's what I would do:

      * Iron a 16x23" sheet of aluminum foil. The wrinkles aren't as effective against Google mind control.
      * Fold like a paper boat and place on head.
      * Unplug internet connections and fish my VCR out of the basement. The VCR standard is too old to have mind control technology embedded.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    47. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Tom · · Score: 1

      If you're not breaking the law, why wouldn't you let the cops search your car?

      Because it's none of their business. This concept is called "privacy". I don't care if you're a cop, the neighbour or some random stranger - if you want to enter my space then it is me who decides if you may or may not.

      I don't refuse searches out of principle. But I don't agree automatically, either. If the cop can explain to me why he either has a right or a convincing interest, I will probably go along. I don't see the police as the enemy. But I think it is important that I keep control of the situation and make a conscious decision.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    48. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      V-1s and V-2s lead to the Apollo program and got Neill on the Moon.

      They also led to ICBM's and hellfire missiles.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    49. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      There were no reports Presley hurt anybody with his gun slinging, but he was known to have a fascination with firearms. He converted part of a rear building at the estate into a firing range.

      You all know Elvis was American, right?

    50. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not my TV I'm worried about here; I can tear it open and disable that shit.

      I'm worried about the TVs in the bars and in my hotel rooms which I'll get thrown out of/fined/arrested/jailed if I try to tamper with them.

      Black tape over the camera? A camera could be behind any one of fifty-million holes TV cases seem to have these days.

      Glue in the microphone? This attack is bypassed by companies attaching the microphone to the flat panel (which makes a wonderful resonator).

      A sledgehammer will defeat it, but you're back to being thrown out/fined/arrested/jailed.

      There'll probably be a new crime put on the books: "tampering with a surveillance device".

    51. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wer32r · · Score: 1

      Because you don't want those "features", but all the other HDTV makers jumped on the bandwagon too, and you simply can't find a non-bugged set?

      This is already (mostly) true for laptops. It's nearly impossible to find one in the shop that doesn't have a camera and a microphone. The same can be said about cell phones and tablets.

    52. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by wer32r · · Score: 1

      Eventually, the equipment will be mandatory (like safety belts in cars), and it will be illegal to bypass (like copy protection).

    53. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Eventually, the equipment will be mandatory (like safety belts in cars), and it will be illegal to bypass (like copy protection).

      No, this won't happen. Political opponents: "The government is forcing you and your children to be spied on while naked in your bedroom (*lots* of people have TVs in their bedroom).

      Not even the most brain washed sheep-like voters will accept this; and not even the stupidest government will try it.

      In fact, any TV manufacturer who enables such a feature by default, and in particular does not make it clear when it is enabled etc. will soon be on the receiving end of a damaging (at least publicity wise) lawsuit for privacy invasion if any pictures from such a TV leak out, particularly if they are intimate pictures which end up online.

    54. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Cellophane tape might work as well without being permanent.

    55. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by webheaded · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it appears on Usenet before the show airs. That always made me giggle when I used to watch Lost and they aired it super early in Canada.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    56. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      It's hard to block UAVs and vans with x-ray backscatter and other scanning devices that can see through your walls and roof. If you take the effort you'll make yourself a target.

    57. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      That's more along the lines I was thinking. When EVERYONE is observable all the time, social standards will change. You will no longer have the dual standards of what's acceptable in public verses what's acceptable in private, because everything everywhere will be public. That's short term, like in the next generation. Long term, as communication becomes ever faster and easier and with neural interface devices there will be an effective merging of consciousness between people.

    58. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Lol

    59. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by tqk · · Score: 2

      There were no reports Presley hurt anybody with his gun slinging, but he was known to have a fascination with firearms.

      You all know Elvis was American, right?

      MiB said he was an alien and went home. And as far as I'm concerned, Tommy Lee generally makes one hell of a lot more sense than pretty much everything else I've seen recently. For instance, go to Wikipedia and plug in "MiB". It takes you to Mebibyte, which just sucks horribly.

      <moan> ...

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    60. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by tqk · · Score: 1

      V-1s and V-2s lead to the Apollo program and got Neill on the Moon.

      They also led to ICBM's and hellfire missiles.

      You say that like it's a bad thing. Imagine being the guy who came up with this.

      I'm feeling especially moody this morning for some reason. :-P Nietzche seems to bring out the worst in me.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    61. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Or just don't buy the god damn tv. Simple.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    62. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      And suddenly you are denied a license to the various patents required to decrypt the over-the-air television signals. They also won't give you a decryption key for HDCP unless you agree to include the cameras. You can't release a TV that has no inputs!

      That's how they play the game. Best of all: it's not considered a cartel under U.S. law!

    63. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone lives in the USA. Not every country is as screwed up either. You're free to move elsewhere. Just do it by boat though to avoid the xray scanner cancer.

    64. Re:Omnipresent Surveillance by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Yup, I didnt buy one either.
      8)

  4. In Soviet Russia by Roachie · · Score: 1

    There is NO TV!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by davester666 · · Score: 1

      There are just camera's and mic's.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  5. In Soviet Russia by Roachie · · Score: 1

    Its too HARD!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  6. Careful... by FreedomOfThought · · Score: 1

    Try not to show fear while watching... That is dangerous. "Your worst enemy, he reflected, was your nervous system. At any moment the tension inside you was liable to translate itself into some visible symptom."

  7. Reality TV ... by donstenk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    .. the wrong way round! And possibly even more boring.

    In what way is this different from your typical smartphone, tablet, most laptops, and soon I imagine, a Samsung fridge?

    This is

    --
    Dennis Onstenk
    1. Re:Reality TV ... by xstonedogx · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I have a TV on my dresser and it gives me a great view from my bed. I know from experience (and from mirrored closet doors) that the view back is pretty god damn fantastic too. Not sure I want most strangers to see all that, though. Just the special ones.

    2. Re:Reality TV ... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Rest assured that we don't want to see it either.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  8. Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd just put duct tape over the lens, or better yet, open the thing up and snip the wires going to the mic and camera(s)
    The warranty would go bye-bye but my privacy doesn't.

    1. Re:Good luck with that by multiben · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe you could buy a different brand? Or is that too easy?

    2. Re:Good luck with that by Idaho · · Score: 2

      So obviously you have something to hide. Doubleplusungood.

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    3. Re:Good luck with that by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1
      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Good luck with that by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      As with my cars I would obey the rules of the warranty (i.e. change the oil every 7500 miles even though synthetic oil is good for 10,000+), and when it runs-out THEN I would make permanent modifications. So I wouldn't be cracking-open the TV immediately; I'd just be taping over the lens that first year.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Good luck with that by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Hulu + Computer is the TV of a new generation. Cable is so old school.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:Good luck with that by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Hey! My sig is finally relevant to a discussion!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    7. Re:Good luck with that by Confusedent · · Score: 1

      Boggles my mind that not everyone is using flat screens w/ HDMI + computer, yet.

    8. Re:Good luck with that by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Today you can. Tomorrow, not so much as it will be 'standard', or even 'required'.

      And once its required, tampering will become a crime.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    9. Re:Good luck with that by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Hulu + a computer? Even that is too old school. Try a $50 Roku box, along with Hulu, Amazon, Netflix, tons of sports and specialty/international channels.

    10. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Put a mirror in front of the TV and report Samsung to the copyright cops.

    11. Re:Good luck with that by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Probably because some of us don't want to pay the still ridiculous prices of a flat screen when there are much better things to spend our money on. Also, HDMI is a deal-breaker.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    12. Re:Good luck with that by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      Except that if you don't watch those mandatory commercials (which will eventually be integrated with this technology somehow), you won't be able to watch TV.

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  9. Max Headroom? by hackwrench · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about Max Headroom?

    1. Re:Max Headroom? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      You mean M-M-M-Max Headroom.
      FTFY.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  10. CIA: we'll spy on you through your appliances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More and more personal and household devices are connecting to the internet, from your television to your car navigation systems to your light switches. CIA Director David Petraeus cannot wait to spy on you through them.

    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/03/petraeus-tv-remote/

  11. Reminds me of those School Laptops by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

    .....which were provided to Pennsylvanian teens, and had integrated cameras, but there was no indication to the users that they were being recorded in their bedrooms (by the government).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Reminds me of those School Laptops by supersloshy · · Score: 1

      The difference between this and that is that these TVs and the laptops are physically capable of spying but not made to do that. The schools themselves installed software which spied on the kids. These TVs are perfectly fine. However... That doesn't mean they can't be made to be otherwise.

      --
      "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
    2. Re:Reminds me of those School Laptops by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative

      They were Macs, they had indications. When they were recording, the little green light next to the camera was on.

      The students noticed it. Some of them had reported it, but were told it was nothing and to not worry about it.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Reminds me of those School Laptops by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was a light that came on those laptops. That is what raised suspicion, but the school lied about it with some cover story. As you know, they were later caught.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    4. Re:Reminds me of those School Laptops by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      State-provided computer equipment for students comes preloaded with keylogging and stealth cam software that calls home whenever the computer finds an active internet connection. I can certainly vouch for this, as I have remotely disabled such software many, many times. The last one I did was so loaded it barely did anything useful, and certainly not at the speed expected from a dual core machine - I ended up giving instructions over the phone for wiping the thing and installing OpenSuSE 11.4 (12.1 failed miserably, fuck all worked).

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    5. Re:Reminds me of those School Laptops by jc79 · · Score: 1

      Not the government. The school. I doubt the teachers illegally spying on their students were sending the video stream to the department for education (or whatever the local equivalent is).

    6. Re:Reminds me of those School Laptops by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      The difference between this and that is that these TVs and the laptops are physically capable of spying but not made to do that.

      So what you're saying is... there is no difference at all.

  12. Why? by multiben · · Score: 1

    So many questions, but the first of them all is "why would I now buy a Samsung TV"? I mean, I think they make a pretty decent TV, but they're not good enough to invite all of Samsung and its affiliates into my living room. What am I getting out the exchange here?

  13. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The webcam on my laptop has an LED light up when powered on. This TV lacks such an indicator.

  14. It begs the question: by decipher_saint · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Who watches the watcher watchers?

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:It begs the question: by kat_skan · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's like this:

      You watch the TV.
      The TV watches you watching the TV.
      Some ad agency flunky watches the TV watching you watch the TV.
      His monitor watches him watch the TV watching you watch the TV.
      His supervisor watches the monitor watching him watch the TV watching you watch the TV.

      Turtles all the way down.

    2. Re:It begs the question: by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Thank you for watching us watch you watch us all!

  15. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by philip.paradis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Best of all, there appears to be no physical indication of the mic and camera's status, so consumers have no way of knowing when they're being monitored, or by whom... and if you don't find the idea of a TV that watches you creepy enough, apparently Samsung's Terms of Service include a clause allowing third-party apps to make use of the monitoring system, and use the data gathered for their own purposes.

    Did you somehow manage to miss that part of the summary? It's only most of the summary, after all. In short, there's plenty to see here, only it's third parties doing the seeing, and you apparently don't get any say in when they do the seeing, or what they use the footage for.

    --
    Write failed: Broken pipe
  16. 5 steps to recall by Voyager529 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1.) rig a secondary/tertiary monitor output on a nearby desktop and wire it to the TV's camera/audio input.
    2.) set the computer output to a nonstop 24/7 loop of "Friday" by Rebecca Black, along with a slide show that alternates between Goatse, 2 girls 1 cup, and horse porn.
    3.) bask in the fact that somwhere, someone is regretting the release of this technology.
    4.) Don't EVER cross the wires from step 1.
    5.) Profit.

    1. Re:5 steps to recall by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      For bonus points, synchronize the actions in the video with the music.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:5 steps to recall by GNious · · Score: 1

      3.) bask in the fact that somwhere, someone is regretting the release of this technology.

      You don't think think that having to sift through hours of recordings of owners masturbating is going to do that on its own?

    3. Re:5 steps to recall by trongey · · Score: 1

      3 Steps:
      1) buy 2 Samsung TVs
      2) set them face to face
      3) tune them to the same channel at full volume and let the feedback fun begin.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  17. Porn. by khasim · · Score: 1

    Duh!

    Think of it more like "chat roulette".

    1. Re:Porn. by GioMac · · Score: 1

      pr0n is available for others while you're watching others pr0n

      --
      "It feels like I'm at the Zoo when reading this thread - I'm frightened, but it's interesting" (c)
  18. Bye, Samsung! by _pi-away · · Score: 1

    I have a Samsung TV, and overall I really like it. But with shit like this going on I won't be buying one again.

    Bye, Samsung!

    --

    "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
  19. finally, actual reality TV by alienzed · · Score: 1

    I hope it takes a page from the Wii and reminds people to stop watching for a while. They could couple it with shots of the consumer looking like a total zombie to convince them to get the heck up and move around for a while.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  20. free security cctv? by moneybabylon · · Score: 1

    Does it mean if it sees a break-in, it will call the cops for me?

    1. Re:free security cctv? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      If I'm not home, will it call the burglars for me?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  21. Footage by rampant+mac · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll go out on a limb here and say:

    This TV is going to end up capturing so much footage of bored men fapping to porn.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    1. Re:Footage by acoustix · · Score: 1

      This allows us to fill in the hole

      That's what she said.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  22. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by Dantoo · · Score: 2

    It's simply convergence. Think of the television as a large smartphone. In the near future when you sit down at the Christmas feast you will be able to share with friends and family in far flung places. You'll be able to attend meetings and interact at lectures. You can already do this at your pc? Then you already understand, just think of interacting in the lounge-room rather than the basement. The television is just an oversized monitor now, it's just getting incrementally smarter (and bigger).

    Need to see a doctor or receive post-hospital care at home? Your internet connect television/ip phone allows this to happen in your home. You will be able to plug your auxiliary medical kit into the usb slot and your practitioner will see your vital signs directly.
    It's Jetsons but sadly without the flying car.

    The television has become the focal point of media in the home. Making it the communication device as well is a very simple step in the digital age.

  23. so what by nimbius · · Score: 1

    that netflix-streaming laptop has a camera and mic too. throw in a coupon, offer a free "app" or "show" or something to get their attention. if all else fails just do it anyway. we all know the repercussions for a major multinational conglomerate violating your personal privacy basically amount to a dog and pony show anyhow.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  24. Re:And? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Besides it's not like these companies have all of the staff and resources necessary to watch and monitor the thousands to millions of TV users all at once.

    You're probably right. I mean, it's not as if clandestine government agencies are building huge data warehouses or anything, right?

    OK, so maybe they are; but hey, the top clandestine government agent promises he's not spying on you, and what possible reason is there to not believe every word the country's top spy-master says?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  25. Re:Possible legitimate uses are... by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

    I mean really, who actually needs an Internet-connected TV?

    Me. I have a Sony IP TV with Netflix, Hulu, Vudu, Crackle and a host of other apps. I pretty much only use the Netflix app, but I use it a lot. It saves me the time and heat/expense/hassle of having to turn on my PS3. I just wish I could get HBO Go on it.... hmm.. maybe that's available on the PS3.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  26. Celine DIon CD, Electrical tape and an air gap by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    problem solved. A John Tesh or Yonni CD is an acceptable substitutes.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  27. regulations are stupid by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    Yeah, who needs oversight committees for corporations. They never do anything wrong, trust the free market, because you can always buy a TV from a manufacturer who DOESN'T do this, until they all do it because there's so much profit to be made by selling the data. Of course I suppose the free market is still at work here, because people could decide between NOT watching spy-TV or watching it and giving up their privacy, TV isn't a constitutional RIGHT. Hmm... I appear to have confused myself.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  28. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

    except that i can watch tv without xbox or a web cam, and i can play video games without a kinect. if i have a kinect, i can unplug just it from the xbox and still use the xbox to watch tv. xbox is also more forthcoming about how kinect data is used.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  29. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Besides it's not like these companies have all of the staff and resources necessary to watch and monitor the thousands to millions of TV users all at once.

    Erm... why do people always assume that I only care about myself? I care if anyone is being watched or spied on, no matter they're being spied on by.

  30. Re:Oh QUIT this bullshit already. by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Boy, you are retarded. How about getting a life?

  31. the inidications by Skapare · · Score: 1

    At least HAL showed a red light.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  32. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agree, but disagree.

    I think it's another attempt to return Televisions to the actual focal point of the living room, not just an accessory to something else. (e.g., Means of displaying a game system, bluray, media player) The TV isn't going to be the wall screen appliance, it's just going to take on a lot of the social features that companies wish TVs could do in the past.

    I wonder if they're thinking of facial recognition as a new means of check ins for things. Who needs Nielsen when Samsung can not only see who's watching what, but determine if they are actively watching it? Think about the fine tuning you can do with TV advertisements if you know who is watching and when. Or a Facebook integration that checks in when you start watching a show.

    I'm not saying these are things I desire, but I'm sure it's what they're imagining.

  33. Re:And? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    Interesting, I use a low end cell phone with no "smart" features, or a camera. Naturally it has a mic, it is a phone.
    My computer has no webcam installed, my notebook has a yellow stickie label over the camera.
    To deal with snooping on my web search history I have a perl script that does an lpw get on random words from the dictionary and clicks a random number of links randomly spaced apart. This generates search noise.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  34. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Again, is that somehow different than the XBOX?

  35. Re:Be thankful... by Vectronic · · Score: 2

    I think it would be preferable if they were competing with NSA/CIA/DHS/etc... at least then whatever methods they (Samsung, et al) used to spy on you wouldn't be as useful to the former groups.

    Given most "Smart" TV's have WiFi and/or Bluetooth, it's like Google LivingRoomView, BedroomView, ShitterView... just drive around with the right transceivers, SWAT will probably have access too.

  36. Child porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this thing videos some teenagers screwing, will employees of the company be prosecuted under child porn laws? Will the teenagers be arrested for making child porn?

    1. Re:Child porn? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      The answers to your questions, in reverse order, are "Yes" and "Only if they're low-level employees; no one above middle management has anything to worry about."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Child porn? by black3d · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen. The footage isn't being "sent" anywhere. It's being used by the onboard software to provide personalized favourites channels, etc. The cameras also serve to make use of the onboard Skype and onboard Youtube recording. The article is largely FUD. The only concern is the security of preventing third party "hacks", although this would likely require physical access. Everything that isn't data storage should be write-protected, leaving only possible memory hacks and there's no indication that the video can be "requested" remotely anyway, but rather it has to be specifically pushed by the software. Samsung hasn't directly answered their questions to confirm if this is the case, but it *should* be expected. If they actually started spying on people, that'd be it for Samsung in the marketplace. As for serving targeted ads, this is more likely - consumers repeatedly sign away permission to be bombarded by targetted ads everywhere. TV will be no different.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
  37. once they invent some kind of wave that transmits by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Hey Anonymous Coward - once they invent some kind of "wave" that travels "wirelessly" through the air and transmits information... Then I bet you'll really be embarrassed! Think about it - we could possibly receive information WITHOUT A WIRE. I'm going to call it.. the radio.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  38. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    yep, nothing to see at all

    Just figure out what the gestures and sounds to avoid are when you first plug it in.

  39. Re:And? by vux984 · · Score: 2

    It's nothing that hasn't been done before.

    An always on camera in your living room that records everything send the stream to samsung has been done before?

    When? Where?

    If you're so afraid about TVs becoming more advanced, then why not be so scared about cell phones,

    I vaguely recall NSA wiretapping our phone calls was something of an issue for a lot of people...

    game consoles, iPods and the like?

    Because the game consoles and ipods:
    a) have indicators when they are recording
    b) don't stream that data back to the mothership

    Sure they have the -potential- too, but the difference here is that samsung actually -is- streaming the data out.

    Besides it's not like these companies have all of the staff and resources necessary to watch and monitor the thousands to millions of TV users all at once.

    All it takes is one creep set-hopping from living room to living room...

    They don't need to be everywhere at once to be beyond creepy.

  40. Re:And? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    then why not be so scared about cell phones

    Don't own one.

    game consoles

    Mine are modded and firewalled.

    iPods

    Rockbox on a Sansa.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  41. Re:Oh QUIT this bullshit already. by doston · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a little ironic posting as an AC, but asserting privacy has no value and that it should be given up for better lousy TV? That is truly redonk.

  42. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

    Normal webcams have an LED or something similar that turns on when the camera is active. This does not.

  43. Can I by geoffaus · · Score: 1

    Link it to chat roulette?

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  44. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by wreakyhavoc · · Score: 2

    Or somehow different than your microphone and webcam featured laptop? iPad anyone? Oh that's right, whenever an App has access to your cam a little light blinks to let you know.

    Whew. Glad that's settled.

  45. Re:Oh QUIT this bullshit already. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Chances are, this lengthy, nonsensical rant was written by one of the following:

    1) Someone who works in an industry which would benefit greatly from being able to spy on people in their homes, or

    2) Some troll who obviously watches entirely too much television.

    One has to wonder how well the leash fits, and whether or not this mongrel is aware they're wearing one.

    Now, sit, Ubu, sit... Good boy.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  46. Re:Be thankful... by freman · · Score: 2

    Nothing a roll of duct tape couldn't fix.... or a soldering iron.

    Duct tape over the camera and solder the output lines for a cassette deck... err mp3 player... to the mice in on the tv... play porn music on a loop...

  47. The Light of Other Days by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 4, Informative

    A related sci-fi book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Light_of_Other_Days "The Light of Other Days is a 2000 science fiction novel written by Stephen Baxter based on a synopsis by Arthur C. Clarke, which explores the development of wormhole technology to the point where information can be passed instantaneously between points in the space-time continuum. ... The novel examines the philosophical issues that arise from the world's population (increasingly suffering from ecological and political disturbances) being aware that they could be under constant observation by anyone, or that they could observe anyone without their knowledge. ..."

    There are a couple other similar sci-fi stories as well, including one about "Slow Glass" by Bob Shaw with the same name as that novel.
    http://strick.net/blog/041103.html

    And one about a similar time viewer (I forget the name).

    A good thing to keep in mind is, just because we can do something, does not mean we should.
    http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2009/02/11/solid-development-principles-in-motivational-pictures/
    http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/files/2011/03/SingleResponsibilityPrinciple2_71060858.jpg

    What kind of word do we want to live in, and what kind of world do we want for our children, and children's children, and so on, for seven or more generations?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_generation_sustainability

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:The Light of Other Days by hoeferbe · · Score: 1
      Paul Fernhout (109597) wrote:

      And one about a similar time viewer (I forget the name).

      Perhaps you are thinking of The Dead Past by Isaac Asimov. That story features a researcher-for-hire's attempt to build a chronoscope in a society where all academic research is highly regulated and research into time-viewing is very restricted. It has a thought-provoking ending.

    2. Re:The Light of Other Days by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      Yes, "The Dead Past" is probably the one I was thinking of, thanks. I just looked at it again in Asimov's "Earth is Room Enough" just now.

      I can still wonder if there is still one more old story about a single inventor of such a cheap device (one where the inventor uses false labels on envelopes that fall off due to weak glue when they send out the plans to everyone). But I may be getting some stories mixed up with another sci-fi one where there was universal surveillance. And I don't remember all the details from "The Light of Other Days" so I may be mixing in some plot points from there?

      That Wikipedia link on "The Dead Past" also points to two other stories, "E for Effort" and "Paycheck", but I'm pretty sure I have not read either one of those.

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  48. Ahem... by Saint+Dharma · · Score: 1

    Doubleplus Ungood.

  49. Re:And? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    just so you know: know one gives a damn about you.

    Also, a perl script like that would be trivial to filter.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. Re:Problem solved by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    But you only can decide to not buy it because of the problem if you are aware of the problem.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  51. I wonder how much they pay? by RKBA · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much they pay people to install these things? I would be willing to put one in a closet or some empty, unused room if they paid me well enough for it. :-|

  52. "Terms of Service"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    I thought you were buying this thing.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  53. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But are you sure that LED is not controlled by software (drivers)? Because otherwise, someone with control over the OS could disable that feature and record unannounced, while giving you a false sense of security.

    Paranoia ftw.

  54. Duct tape by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  55. DRM by jquirke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The television has detected more persons in the room than this content is licensed for.

    Please reduce the number of persons in the room, or press the RED button to authorise a payment of a $X per additional person in the room.

    1. Re:DRM by black3d · · Score: 1

      This is coming.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
  56. Re:Be thankful... by formfeed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing a roll of duct tape couldn't fix.....

    Isn't that true for most things in life?

  57. Re:And? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    " we are going to use this device to watch you, too bad " compared to "you can use this device for video and audio sharing with your friends" is far different.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  58. And when you gaze long into a TV, the TV also gazes into you.

    1. Re:And by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      at last! The long-awaited Nietsche reference! :D

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  59. 1984? by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

    I guess the terms of use can insight feelings of 1984 if you're pessimistic about it, and the lack of an indicator light is careless design, but the 1984 fears seem a bit hyperbolic to me. In 1984 the TVs were mandated and the government was plugged into each camera. There doesn't seem to be any malice here - I doubt Samsung has an interest in shaping the world in the form of an Orwellian nightmare. Rather, this just seems to be a cultural oversight - doing business in foreign lands leads to those and those in business love to tell anecdotes about them - Mexican Novas, Nothing Sucks Like Electrolux, etc. Whereas American engineers and marketing people would be quick to concern themselves about any parallels to Oceania because almost everyone reads 1984 in American schools and top-hat capitalists naively use it to defend their views, Korean engineers and marketing people probably didn't think about such concerns. This seems to be the way all TVs are going, and when Samsung realizes that models with indicator lights for the camera sell better they'll probably implement it (I'm sure there's no indicator light because that would have added a couple of pennies onto the cost of production or it never even crossed anyones mind as necessary, not because the evil people at Samsung want to spy on unsuspecting couch potatoes).

    A much better literary analogy would be the TVs in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit-451. That's the goal of all TV and game console companies, and that's what this thing sounds like to me. Samsung doesn't want to spy on you. They just want you to sit your fat ass in front of their TV all day and buy services from them with it. Unless they have some secret contract with the NSA . . . *puts on tinfoil hat*

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    1. Re:1984? by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      People keep forgetting this: only the members of the upper class were bugged and monitored. The plebes were left alone with their pointless little existences. Quote 1984 only if you have actually read and comprehend it.

      So the fact that I know the plot details and such doesn't indicate that I've read and comprehended 1984, but if I copy and paste a quote from the book you'll believe me? What I'm not comprehending is your point.

      Personally, I think everyone takes 1984 way too seriously. Do you distrust everyone named O'Brien?

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    2. Re:1984? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Do you distrust everyone named O'Brien?

      Well, he did help a Tosk escape from his hunters.

  60. Re:And? by Gryle · · Score: 1

    know one gives a damn about you

    He does know that one gives a damn about him. Hence the security measures.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  61. Re:Be thankful... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Works for: 1) Nagging wife 2) Hyper Kids 3) Neighbor who won't stop telling you how great Jesus is 4) Guy who keeps stealing your morning newspaper 5) Business rivals so many uses

  62. Re:Be thankful... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

    Not to mention the contemplative souls who think it's their god given right to stop*right* at the top of the escalator, suddenly struck by a compulsive need to understand their role in the universe. Ditto for those thoughtful folks who park their carts in the middle of grocery aisle while they weigh the relative merits of "chunky soup" vs. "minestrone"

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  63. Re:Be thankful... by grantspassalan · · Score: 2

    That won't work, because they will make possession of duct tape a felony.

    --
    A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
  64. XKCD for ya by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Speaking of stopping at the top of escalator: http://xkcd.com/954/

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  65. Four years ago by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I had a neighbor who told me he didn't want an HD TV because 'they can listen to and watch you'. Now I have to go apologize for not believing him. Perhaps I'll bring an offering of tinfoil.

  66. Status light? by hantms · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please explain to me why not having an indicator light is significant. The manufacturer controls how the entire thing is built, so it could also easily build in a function to use the camera but without making any status light come on. As I type this the status light of the camera in my Lenovo laptop is off.. But is the camera off, really?

    Bit of a silly article. If you don't like web cams (or any camera) then just say so. Makes no sense to fully trust Logitech but not Samsung or anyone else.

    Encore for the tinfoilers: every iPhone comes with one or two cameras. And you really don't know about the software that runs it.

    Next.

    1. Re:Status light? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      There are websites that, when reviewing a new product, take it apart to see its innards. If your Lenovo laptop had a placebo recording indicator light built into it by the manufacturer, then do you think we would not have heard about it on /. by now?

      This is the big deal behind Open Source software, not that it's free (that's FOSS for those who don't know) but that it's completely transparent, and that by the community having access to the source code, they can spot bugs and security flaws easily and have them corrected.

      Voiding a warranty is what prevents the average user from tearing open their device to see any potential security issues, but any good review site, or security awareness group will gladly do this with the device while testing it.

      You could of course start down the road saying that the version they give to reviewers might function normally, but later on they can produce 'faulty' models that don't do this. I guess it's just a question on how paranoid you want to get.

    2. Re:Status light? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      There are websites that, when reviewing a new product, take it apart to see its innards. If your Lenovo laptop had a placebo recording indicator light built into it by the manufacturer, then do you think we would not have heard about it on /. by now?

      How does opening the machine up to see the circuitry prove that the software cannot turn on the camera without turning on the indicator LED? How does reverse-engineering a FOSS driver prove that the firmware doesn't have an undocumented API call to enable that mode of operation?

    3. Re:Status light? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Because in most webcam devices, built into the laptop, the light is a diode wired in series with the power supply to the camera. If the camera is getting juice, the light is on. This method is taken by most manufactures (it's probably a directive passed down by some government authority) that the light be there to notify user of camera function. This prevents a malevolent hacker spying by overriding any software that provides this safeguard.

    4. Re:Status light? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Makes no sense to fully trust Logitech but not Samsung or anyone else.

      Innocent until proven guilty? I have not been repeatedly screwed over by Logitech. But otherwise, yeah, you raise a good point.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  67. Yakov says... by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, joke tells you!

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  68. What was science fiction is now reality... by srix · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this device was at all inspired by this story?

  69. Re:Be thankful... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    This was the subject of (possibly local) urban mythology several years ago, when desktop flat panels hit mainstream. It went a little like this: that the cameras were actually integrated, pixel for pixel, into the screen itself, rather like an insect compound eye. It's not too much of a stretch. <anecdote>one time I was scanning documents and forgot to load a sheet - I also forgot to close the lid. What I ended up with was a very high resolution, perfect image of the area of the textured ceiling and striplight directly above the scanner bed.</anecdote>

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  70. Re:Be thankful... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    they already did. Going tooled up for a kidnapping, are you?

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  71. Pay per viewer by Animats · · Score: 1

    Pay per viewer is a real issue. Sports bars are supposed to purchase public performance licenses. Now the NFL can enforce that.

  72. Re:And? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    there's one of those warehouses being built in Nottingham. The foundations are about as far as it's got so far, but the ad board claims it will be one of the largest and most secure data centres in the Midlands.

    Oh, you bet your arse it won't be a privately-run centre. You bet your arse "secure" will mean "armed".

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  73. Re:too bad by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    I think more people ought to don IRLED hats when they go out - these handy gadgets overwhelm the sensors on CCTV cameras, rendering you electronically anonymous. Leave your cellphone home and the worst you'll get is some rentacop telling you to take your hat off - to which the reply "fuck off" is usually sufficient to stop him bugging you further.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  74. Re:hmmm.... porn by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    um... section 71 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005:

    Assistance by offender: immunity from prosecution

    (1)If a specified prosecutor thinks that for the purposes of the investigation or prosecution of any offence it is appropriate to offer any person immunity from prosecution he may give the person a written notice under this subsection (an “immunity notice”).

    (2)If a person is given an immunity notice, no proceedings for an offence of a description specified in the notice may be brought against that person in England and Wales or Northern Ireland except in circumstances specified in the notice.

    (3)An immunity notice ceases to have effect in relation to the person to whom it is given if the person fails to comply with any conditions specified in the notice.
    (4)Each of the following is a specified prosecutor—
    (a)the Director of Public Prosecutions;
    (b)the Director of Revenue and Customs Prosecutions;
    (c)the Director of the Serious Fraud Office;
    (d)the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland;
    (e)a prosecutor designated for the purposes of this section by a prosecutor mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (d).
    (5)The Director of Public Prosecutions or a person designated by him under subsection (4)(e) may not give an immunity notice in relation to proceedings in Northern Ireland.
    (6)The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland or a person designated by him under subsection (4)(e) may not give an immunity notice in relation to proceedings in England and Wales.
    (7)An immunity notice must not be given in relation to an offence under section 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (c. 40) (cartel offences).
    --

    So what that basically does is gives anyone who is carrying out work for a public authority, immunity from prosecution for ANYTHING except racketeering (including murder!) if they turn evidence in ANY OTHER CASE.

    So, yeah, I think they covered that there, buddy. "1984" is immune from prosecution if they turn over the video intercept for the child porn offence/s, regardless of whether or not they saved a copy for the messroom or their private collection.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  75. Re:Be thankful... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    Last step: be happy.

    Instructions should always end in an instruction to be happy.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  76. Re:Be thankful... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    My house is getting more and more illegal by the week.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. That's not the hard part ... by ancienthart · · Score: 1

    I'm a pretty hairy guy, I'm getting a bit of a tummy and I watch the TV 1-2 hours each night shirtless. Poor, poor surveilance guys. :D

  79. Experiment by sdk4777 · · Score: 1

    Buy two TV's, make them watch each other.

  80. But it would have to be online, wouldn't it? by master_p · · Score: 1

    So why connect the TV to the internet, when we know that it can open the door to Orwellian surveillance?

  81. Re:Be thankful... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Be thankful he isn't trying to compete with the NSA and CIA. If he was, the TV would listen and watch while it killed your neighbor.

    Fixed that for you...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  82. I already know a patch for the camera function... by Anonymousslashdot · · Score: 1

    Duct tape !

  83. TV set and functions by havana9 · · Score: 1

    I still have a TV set made in 1985, and it works flawlessly, connected to a dvb-s and dvb-t receiver. It's big, with woodgrain and has a funky 20 W audio amplifier. It's the right TV set to watch reruns of the A Team, George & Mildred and Derrick. Why I have to buy a more complex TV set that tries to mimic a computer, with buggy software, complex menus and so on, but with puny little speakers ripped from a speakerphone?

  84. For all the tape comments by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Yes, that was my first thought too: "Can it see through tape?"

    But of course the TV will be designed to not operate if the camera is obstructed. Better to just not have a TV at all.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  85. Thought police by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    Ernst & Young has developed software which identifies potential corporate criminals by inferring their mental state from their electronic communications. They are literally policing employees' thoughts: using their mental states to flag them as criminal suspects. Here's an article about it from the Economist: http://www.economist.com/node/21547833

  86. Old tinfoil hat story by wye43 · · Score: 1

    First of all, this TV was presented in January, so this is 2 months old.

    Secondly, the camera is for gesture and facial recognition, used to interact with the UI of anything that runs on the TV platform, of course including any 3rd party application(app store, hello?). Its the exact same thing as Kinect. So this is just pure tinfoilhattism.

  87. Re:And? by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    ...

    Besides it's not like these companies have all of the staff and resources necessary to watch and monitor the thousands to millions of TV users all at once.

    Not all at once? This is why it is no big deal?

    I would think being able to monitor any of millions of people any time they liked, to whatever degree they felt the interest for, without restriction, would be sufficient to make it a big deal.

    This is mostly meant for facial recognition technology, Skype, and the like.

    Facial recognition = the ability of software to recognize who is in a room, and continuously report the occupants to a third party data marketer. Think all of the TVs of a major vendor doing this, everywhere.

    Chill, people.

    Right. Move along folks, there's nothing to see.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  88. Mandatory message viewing / commercials by Beerdood · · Score: 1

    "I'm sorry, you cannot continue watching your regularly scheduled programming until you view the following message from our sponsors / message from our government"

    How long before this is implemented? With PVR now, you can skip through ads, much to the disdain of advertisers. If you don't have that right now, at least you can change the channel or leave the room or something during a commercial. With this technology, maybe you'll be forced to actually watch the commercials now...

    --
    Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  89. My next TV purchase by readin · · Score: 1

    I should have been doing this all along with laptop purchases, but I know that next time I buy a TV or laptop I will ask if it has a built in camera and if so, how do I work the lens cover.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  90. Re:What is the difference between this and xbox? by pscottdv · · Score: 1

    I've been saying since the mid-90s that eventually our phones, computers and televisions would merge into a single appliance. What I didn't know was what that device would be called. 16 years later, I know a little more. I know that the name will start with an "i".

    --

    this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

  91. "Television is something that watches you." by Darth+Technoid · · Score: 1

    i wrote this in 1998 (14 years ago), on the first page of my book, Playing for Profit (published by John Wiley & Sons).

  92. Your TV by Reeznarch · · Score: 1

    Is the new ceiling cat.

  93. Re:Possible legitimate uses are... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    Possible legitimate uses?

    The MPAA can count the number of viewers and make sure they are all properly licensed.

    The advertisers can pause the ads if you are not paying attention.

    The government can check to see that there are no known bad people in the room.

    The secret government program of identifying bad people can watch your facial expressions to be sure that you are not likely to be now or to become a bad person.


    In short:
    * It protects the economy by preventing piracy and ensuring advertisers get what they pay for.
    * It protects us from bad people.
    What's not to like?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  94. Re:Gratitude and joy by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

    5, AC, 5!

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  95. Obligatory Step - Cash Back Program by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Extra Cash Back:

    6.) Return TV set to shop with the message "This television seems to be broken, it only plays crap!"
    7.) More Profit!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  96. This doesn't sound legal in Washington State by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 1

    It's illegal to record someone's voice in Washington state without their previous consent. Anyone who unwillingly come into contact could bring damages and civil lawsuits against the person who owns the TV as well as any companies involved in the transfer of this data.

  97. Limited Usefulness of Duct Tape by hicksw · · Score: 1

    And what if the only way to change channels is Kinect-style hand-waving?
    Or voice controlled -- "Let me watch the game, please"
    --
    Law of truly large numbers - almost all numbers are larger than you can imagine.