Slashdot Mirror


Company Designs "Big Brother Chip"

Taco Cowboy writes "Here comes a chip that can pinpoint you in-door and out, it can even tell others on which floor of a building you are located. It's the Broadcom 4752 chip. It takes signals from global navigation satellites, cell phone towers, and Wi-Fi hot spots, coupled with input from gyroscopes, accelerometers, step counters, and altimeters The company calls abilities like this 'ubiquitous navigation,' and the idea is that it will enable a new kind of e-commerce predicated on the fact that shopkeepers will know the moment you walk by their front door, or when you are looking at a particular product, and can offer you coupons at that instant."

166 comments

  1. Potato, potato by samazon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you say "coupons" I hear "pushy advertisements."

    --
    I have the hiccups.
    1. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's this double potato thing?

      Anyway if you're having trouble with your hearing, best to see an otologist.

    2. Re:Potato, potato by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They are going to spend a fortune to give everyone a percentage point or two off an item. Why not save the money and JUST LOWER THE PRICE OF THE ITEM.

      This screams, "let's drive our last remaining customers to Amazon.com."

      Who comes up with this crap?

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    3. Re:Potato, potato by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      I don't need anything, anyway, and if I did I don't have money. They can stuff their coupons up their asses.

      Why is so much money spent in shit like this? I can think of many uses for these chips that would make people's life better. How come the first thing that comes up is targeted advertising?

    4. Re:Potato, potato by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      The money is being spent because it is profitable to spend it.
      These companies are not out there trowing their money away. They are investing.
      Just because you would hate it and see through the shiny coupon to the advertisement and rebel does not mean that most people will.
      Most people are fucking cattle. Cattle are profitable.Coupon! Must spend money.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    5. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My oto is in full working order, you inconsiderate clod!

    6. Re:Potato, potato by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 2

      My favorite phrase to hear after a co-worker, family member (or even once my wife) goes shopping, "I had to buy it, I saved sooooo much money on it," or, "I had to spend $x to save $x. But who can pass that up? Look at how much I saved!!!"

      You do realize that a better way to save money is to not spend it in the first place, right? People that purchase an item only because of the 'deal' they get on it are cattle. People that shop smart and look for coupons/deals/discounts on something they need anyway are smart. The breakdown comes because we've been trained to believe that wants are now needs.

    7. Re:Potato, potato by s0nicfreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many reasons, including but not limited to: If you like the product, you may buy another when you don't have a coupon. You may recommend it to friends, who may buy it without the coupon. Many people think they are too cool to use coupons, and will purposely forgo the coupons.

    8. Re:Potato, potato by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      If you don't have money but have coupons, and do things right, you can get stuff for free.

    9. Re:Potato, potato by Scoth · · Score: 1

      My wife's gotten into some couponing stuff, but fortunately she's pretty practical about it. In our travels, we've run into people who don't seem to understand that just because you have a coupon for something doesn't make it the best deal. They'd rather use the $1 off coupon than buy another brand that's $3 cheaper than the one they have a coupon for. The "coupon savings" number on their receipt is their high score and all they care about, even if the total cost is a little more.

      Coupons are probably the most effective form of advertising - give people an appearance of great savings and they're more likely to buy your brand and not a cheaper one. Give some of these people the ability to get instant coupons on things they're specifically looking at, and they'll eat it up. At least at first.

    10. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But guys! guys! OMG u leik groupon, right? This is just like groupon! you know groups of coupons for groups? Groupon is cool, right? So if we call 'em coupons, everyone will like it! Who doesn't like coupons? You'd have to be some kind of a fascist to not like coupons. Especially groups of coupons!

    11. Re:Potato, potato by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      Please, please - When I try to bargain a price down and receive the 'Oh you're one of those hagglers' attitudes, I just want to say "put the real fsck price on the product and I won't need to even talk to you' but that will never get me a good price - retail, makes you feel dirtier than sleeping with a $2 hooker.

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    12. Re:Potato, potato by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      You oto do it, just to be on the safe side.

    13. Re:Potato, potato by gtall · · Score: 1

      Business School Product come up with this crap. Think about it, they have nothing to do all day except dream up new ways to impress their bosses, so they try to outdo each other with "new and innovative" ways of driving catt...customers to spend.

      And Ron Paul isn't the hope of anyone unless you wish to send the U.S. back to the 1930s.

    14. Re:Potato, potato by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Coupons are probably the most effective form of advertising - give people an appearance of great savings and they're more likely to buy your brand and not a cheaper one. Give some of these people the ability to get instant coupons on things they're specifically looking at, and they'll eat it up. At least at first.

      Given the popularity of stuff like groupon and other paid-"coupon" (they're really more like short-lived gift cards) sites, they apparently work.

      And yes, they are advertising. Just like people like to praise Steam for their sales, or when Amazon discounts something, it's all advertising in the end.

    15. Re:Potato, potato by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      You do realize that a better way to save money is to not spend it in the first place, right?

      Do you realize that every Keynesian economist that read that is having a heart-attack now? Shame on you!

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    16. Re:Potato, potato by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      You're a troll.

      Spending money in useless shit won't do anything for the economy. Actually, it does worse since it increases debt and also feeds parasites, making them stronger.

      Broken Window Fallacy

    17. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to
      To-may-to, To-mah-to
      Let's call the whole thing off

      It's from a popular song by Geo. and Ira Gershwin.

    18. Re:Potato, potato by doston · · Score: 1

      You do realize that a better way to save money is to not spend it in the first place, right? People that purchase an item only because of the 'deal' they get on it are cattle. People that shop smart and look for coupons/deals/discounts on something they need anyway are smart. The breakdown comes because we've been trained to believe that wants are now needs.

      West Indian Workers and the United Fruit Company in Costa Rica, 1870-1940, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1996. An excerpt (pp. 56-59): [The United Fruit] company claimed in its propaganda that its role was to instill consumer values among its workers. . . . In 1929, Crowther, another United Fruit biographer, explicitly explained the importance of the spread of a consumer mentality as he waxed eloquent on the virtues of capitalism and bemoaned the immoral effects of a subsistence economy: "The mozos or working people [in Central America] have laboured only when forced to and that was not often, for the land would give them what little they needed." But this could be changed, he explained, by infusing these laborers with the desire for upward mobility. "The desire for goods, it may be remarked, is something that has to be cultivated. In the United States this desire has been cultivated. . . . American movies, radio, and especially magazines were everywhere, and "our advertising is slowly having the same effect as in the United States -- and it is reaching the mozos. For when a periodical is discarded, it is grabbed up, and its advertising pages turn up as wall paper in the thatched huts. I have seen the insides of huts completely covered with American magazine pages. . . . All of this is having its effect in awakening desires."

    19. Re:Potato, potato by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      When I try to bargain a price down and receive the 'Oh you're one of those hagglers' attitudes

      Well, aside from car and home purchases....what else is out there that you can negotiate price on?

      I can think of some services, but actual things to purchase, I can't really think of anything out there....?

      What all purchases do you haggle over price on (services not included)?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Potato, potato by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who haggles on just about every big ticket item he buys (furniture, power tools, appliances, etc).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    21. Re:Potato, potato by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      In Australia, retailers mark up the prices how ever they like (pretty much), something like a big screen TV that has a sticker price of say $4K can usually be had for around $3K-$3.5K. The same goes for just about all electronics, gadgets and appliances.

      Our retail market is a sham.

      Note also that our goods cost significantly more (often 2 times) here in Australia than in the US - it's often to buy the same item in the US and have it shipped to Australia and it still turns out significantly more expensive... This is regardless of where they are manufactured.

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    22. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the 1930's are looking pretty damned good these days -- not just economically, but also personal freedom & rights.

      The real (U6) unemployment numbers are at least 5% greater today than in the 1930's, and without the massive consumer debt load we have today. Who can save money, when even CDs only pay 1.5 to 2 percent, a quarter of the real inflation rate? The commodity futures market AND the stock markets have been artificially inflated with 0% and (negative)% digital money from the Federal Reserve going to the Wall Street Mobsters. Investors will find better odds, and less monkey-business, in almost any actual gambling casino.

    23. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLZ.

      A $2 hooker won't spend enough time with you to squeeze in a cat-nap. Time is money, dontchaknow.

    24. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope these people can avoid property tax.

      One can "live off the land", but if one finds oneself owing some government something, one must submit oneself to slavery ( aka "capitalism" ) in order to meet the demand extorted from him.

    25. Re:Potato, potato by manwargi · · Score: 1

      To be fair, sometimes quality matters. For example, a generic resealable bag is more likely to leak than certain brand name ones that cost more like Ziplock or whatever. If leaks are going to be an issue, one will want to get the more valuable bag.

      For other, less important things however, the cheap and generic will suffice, and the couponing can bring one into the habit of losing sight of that.

    26. Re:Potato, potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a wonderful opportunity arises right here to mint a new word into English. Here we go, word #1,230,719 is "screwpon".

      scewpon, n. an invasive advertisement that is foisted on the victim in the form of a special offer. Derived from "coupon" a form of discount offer and "screw" as in reference to the completion of unsavoury business.

  2. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by burne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time for tinfoil overalls.

    At least it will be a shiny future.

  3. Perfect Match by foobsr · · Score: 1
    ... with cellphones and NSA databases.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  4. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by JavaBear · · Score: 1

    My trusty OLD Nokia 6150 from 1998 to the rescue :P

  5. but only if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    you have the chip on you - otherwise, piss off

    1. Re:but only if by ickleberry · · Score: 1

      It's only big brother if it's transmitting its location to the power that be or some company. Else it's just a very accurate GPS receiver

    2. Re:but only if by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

      If we can make these chips mandatory to Jeovah Witnesses so we can predict when they are about to knock at our door, it would be a great life improvement.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    3. Re:but only if by Squidlips · · Score: 1

      Have no fear; these chips will mandatory for ALL of us soon. To protect us you see. I plan to enjoy my last few years before that....

  6. How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until these chips are mandatory for "our own safety"?

    1. Re:How long? by Squidlips · · Score: 1

      5 years. Already police states such as Massachusetts are considering GPS transponders in all cars, supposedly to levy a miles-traveled tax which is bad enough...

  7. too late, I have them beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have walk thru scanners that can be installed at the doorway to your retail establishment that, upon walking through, will determine how much money you have on you in cash and credit, and then will place a gold necklace with a dollar sign around your neck, with the thickest chains and largest jewelry placed upon visitors with the most money. What I DON'T do is track you around the store. That would be a violation of privacy.

  8. Not exactly a new threat, but... by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "one-stop-shopping" nature of the chip is chilling. Consider, Broadcom has seen enough of a market to warrant developing a sophisticated device, the stated purpose of which is to determine it's position and "phone home" with that information. Worse yet, it will also phone in all the personal details about you that it has access to, so that those "coupons" can be quickly crafted. If that's not scary enough, consider that also available to any given "shop keeper", is a list of all the other shops you've visited, and when. Still not bugged enough? Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

    1. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by daktari · · Score: 2

      Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      More dangerous than merchants? Is that even possible?

      Looks like another example of technology catching up with our greed.

      --
      A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees. -- Willam Blake
    2. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still not bugged enough? Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      This technology in the hands of the government is the highest concern. Imagine, this chip being implanted in every prisoner; nay, in every citizen. samzenpus' use of "Big Brother Chip" in the title is definitely fear-inducing.

    3. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      The "one-stop-shopping" nature of the chip is chilling. Consider, Broadcom has seen enough of a market to warrant developing a sophisticated device, the stated purpose of which is to determine it's position and "phone home" with that information. Worse yet, it will also phone in all the personal details about you that it has access to, so that those "coupons" can be quickly crafted. If that's not scary enough, consider that also available to any given "shop keeper", is a list of all the other shops you've visited, and when. Still not bugged enough? Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      And you'll even be stuck with the bills for calls/SMS/data as the phone reports your whereabouts which are then passed on to nearby merchants or watchful agencies. And perhaps also for the calls/SMS/data returned as so-called coupons or comforting security notifications ("wait there, an officer has been dispatched" or "you're not allowed to enter that movie theater").

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      So which other entities where you talking about, because as far as I know merchants and law enforcement are the same side of a coin.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1

      Still not bugged enough? Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      Honestly, at this point government is so inefficient that I'm not concerned about them having my personal information (except maybe when they don't secure said information.

      So my name, blood type and address sit in a government storehouse for a hundred years? It'll be at least that long before someone is hired that can properly design, then complete form F-AA11b.1.1.X2 'request for acquisition of Loughla's account information'.

      In all seriousness, though, government agencies don't scare me as much as private entities.

    6. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFS is highly misleading. The chip doesn't "phone home" or give data to marketers. It is just an integration of existing phone tech to reduce cost and power consumption. Just like current phones any snooping will be software controlled by the vendor.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by skids · · Score: 1

      Think about in less dangerous hands. Like the guy who currently has to walk around buildings painstakingly clicking his location on a map in order to complete a WiFi quality survey (no, the major vendors haven't couple a high quality GPS/DR system in yet.)

    8. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. Law enforcement gives out prizes to their officers knowing precisely where you've been for the last several years. It isn't like they don't have anything else to do. I have my own special policeguy who watches where I am on a monitor because he's just so interested in me. However, I think he periodically switches with the policeguy watching my neighbor just for a little variety.

    9. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      Your statement isn't even misleading. It's intentionally obtuse. Of course the chip doesn't phone home. It passes the tracking info to the phone itself, which of course can both log and transmit your trail to whomever has the power to ask for it. It's like saying a gun doesn't kill. Well, technically, a human has to pull the trigger (+4 Informative).
      I don't know why so many people try to obfuscate the obvious. They, and that's a broad freaking THEY, want to track everyone. Except business owners (that'd be communistic), the very wealthy, law enforcement, Homeland Security, and those who make the laws, of course.

    10. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Chip is not necessary. Put it into cars and phones and you've got almost everyone covered. No need to bond the tracker to the body. They could use bracelets or anklets for that, as they do now for all the tens of thousands they can't fit into jails and prisons. Not everyone - just the lawbreakers. And with full time internet, phone, and personal location tracking, it'll be damned hard not to be caught breaking any number of thousands of laws. A hell of a lot of people are going to be sporting locked trackers in the future. Maybe even a majority. Wouldn't be too hard to make the anklet/bracelet check for drugs, either, as it's touching the skin.

    11. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      What part of "...not exactly a new threat..." and "..the stated purpose of which..." did you miss? Obviously the chip isn't the entire solution, but it was crafted specifically to be core component in that "solution".

  9. seems like a power hog with all the radios in it by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    seems like a power hog with all the radios in it also there are building where the cell phone signal is poor and GPS may not work in them as well.

  10. !new by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Japanese mobile phones have had this for a while. Personal navigation apps that can guide you through underground stations and inside buildings using wifi and accelerometers when GPS is unavailable.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:!new by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Software or Hardware? This is about taking the multiple chips and software tying them together, and putting it, and logic, on one hardware device. Nothing new. Just consolidation and less energy consumption.

  11. Honest it really is for e-commerce by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 0

    Was this funded by retailers or just another piss poor attempt to implement another good big brother idea. It never ceases to amaze me how many people get conned into this type of technology. Mind you if you are female and blonde; you will accept this with open arms and cannot resist a discount on those pair of new shoes.

    It also reminds me of the old joke " Two Blondes walked in to a shop. You would have thought one of them would have seen it"

    --
    All cows eat grass!
    1. Re:Honest it really is for e-commerce by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Mind you if you are female and blonde; you will accept this with open arms

      just like the sex pest stalker who's following her.

    2. Re:Honest it really is for e-commerce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Social acceptable racism known as a blonde joke. Let's try putting any other racial term in there and see how fast you'd be modded as troll.

    3. Re:Honest it really is for e-commerce by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Social acceptable racism known as a blonde joke. Let's try putting any other racial term in there and see how fast you'd be modded as troll.

      I fear you had a sense of humour bypass; then by your own example decided to pull a racism card and attempted to draw me into a flame war. I would not like to disappoint you by not disappointing you.

      --
      All cows eat grass!
    4. Re:Honest it really is for e-commerce by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

      Mind you if you are female and blonde; you will accept this with open arms

      just like the sex pest stalker who's following her.

      Very well put indeed!

      --
      All cows eat grass!
  12. Engineering oppression by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Growing up in the 80s, living through the boom times of the 90s, and looking back today. What I used to think was was a path to freedom and salvation of the intellectual variety, I now see as our oppression. Slavery of a new type. Step by step we are sealing our own doom while at the same time handing over the keys to a new elite. The social consolidation is giving rise to the new aristocrats.

    I really hope I'm wrong.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Engineering oppression by gottspeed · · Score: 2

      No, you're right, but don't worry; Its the way of things. This situation can't be avoided. There are more smart people than dumb people, its why elite do their best to rise to the top, they know what happens when you don't.

    2. Re:Engineering oppression by gottspeed · · Score: 1

      *More dumb people than smart people. I haven't had my coffee yet.

    3. Re:Engineering oppression by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Growing up in the 80s, living through the boom times of the 90s, and looking back today. What I used to think was was a path to freedom and salvation of the intellectual variety, I now see as our oppression. Slavery of a new type. Step by step we are sealing our own doom while at the same time handing over the keys to a new elite. The social consolidation is giving rise to the new aristocrats.

      I really hope I'm wrong.

      Technology has always been a gift to humanity from humanity. It can be used to free us or enslave us, it all depends on who is in control of the technology.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:Engineering oppression by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Its a new location chip that is optional and doesnt exactly tell everyone else where you are. Did GPS phone home? Was it "sealing our doom and handing the keys over to a new elite"?

      Seriously, what does this chip have to do with what youre talking about?

    5. Re:Engineering oppression by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Technology has always been a gift to humanity from humanity. It can be used to free us or enslave us, it all depends on who is in control of the technology.

      When is humanity in charge of the technology, as opposed to the elite and their bourgeois followers?

    6. Re:Engineering oppression by pla · · Score: 1

      Did GPS phone home? Was it "sealing our doom and handing the keys over to a new elite"?

      Um, yes, actually - Subpoenaing cell phone records (for the few providers that don't just hand them over to any moron that asks) has become standard practice for legal cases ranging from murder to plain ol' divorce, and Zeus help you if you just happen to have taken a scenic route on the "wrong" day.


      Seriously, what does this chip have to do with what youre talking about?

      GPS can only reliably track you in the open - As soon as you go into a building, if you have any signal, you can count on it having an error larger than the building itself.

      Now "they" can not only tell where you went in terms of address, but a play-by-play of every step you take. Every move you make. Someone will be watching you.

    7. Re:Engineering oppression by mikael · · Score: 1

      You don't need GPS in a mobile phone to determine location. Cellphone towers are arranged in a hexagonal pattefn. That way, the signal strength from the nearest tower can determine location to a few dozen meters.

      Since cell-phone towers dont move around, this gves the cell phone company the ability to track your location.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Engineering oppression by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, from my history book I learned what happens after they piss off the peasants too much.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Engineering oppression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Zeus help you if you just happen to have taken a scenic route on the "wrong" day.

      Citations, or simple conspiracy?

    10. Re:Engineering oppression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MY cellphone company can track you, but not me as I have no cellphone...

    11. Re:Engineering oppression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're right, but don't worry; Its the way of things. This situation can't be avoided. There are more smart people than dumb people, its why elite do their best to rise to the top, they know what happens when you don't.

      Huh? Half the population has an IQ of under 100. And of those who fall into the other half, "dumb" thinking is hardly uncommon. Consider Shockley's ideas on race, for example.

      I don't know how you define "elite", but I know more than one Mensa member who has strenuously avoided rising to any sort of top.

    12. Re:Engineering oppression by pla · · Score: 1

      Citations, or simple conspiracy?

      More common than you might think.

    13. Re:Engineering oppression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slavery. Riiiight.

      Settle down, Francis.

    14. Re:Engineering oppression by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      We've seen the elite in charge recently.

      They are not as you describe.

    15. Re:Engineering oppression by preaction · · Score: 1

      If and only if those peasants aren't fooled into believing it's better that way. Take the poor people who vote for Republican candidates that want to end entitlement programs that poor people rely on to help them in this economy. No, please, take them.

    16. Re:Engineering oppression by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      If and only if those peasants aren't fooled into believing it's better that way. Take the poor people who vote for Republican candidates that want to end entitlement programs that poor people rely on to help them in this economy. No, please, take them.

      That even many poor people hold such views isn't surprising. To quote Karl Marx on the subject:

      The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production, so that thereby, generally speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are subject to it. The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas.

      Before a revolution begins, revolutionaries are always a minority, for the reason Marx laid out. That hasn't stopped revolutions from happening in the past, and it won't stop them in the future. Revolutionaries just need to keep in mind that they have to adapt their strategy and expectations to the conditions surrounding them.

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
    17. Re:Engineering oppression by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Technology has always been a gift to humanity from humanity. It can be used to free us or enslave us, it all depends on who is in control of the technology.

      When is humanity in charge of the technology, as opposed to the elite and their bourgeois followers?

      At the inception of the technology and the laws created to govern it. Once seized it has to be held onto, which takes repeated effort by the populace. A recent example is cybercrime laws governing the use of security tools in Australia. The first wave of government laws were rejected, some ten years later they passed.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  13. circumvention by mug+funky · · Score: 5, Funny

    wet a towel and wrap it round your head.

    then get your ass to Mars.

  14. Hack / Jailbreak This by retroworks · · Score: 2

    My wife accidentally ran my new passport with its RFID tag through the washing machine. I still get through customs. The existence of the chips does not make them infallible.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Hack / Jailbreak This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was an idiot, and didn't pull my new passport with its RFID tag out of my pockets, before my wife did the laundry.

      FTFY

    2. Re:Hack / Jailbreak This by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      My wife accidentally ran my new passport with its RFID tag through the washing machine. I still get through customs. The existence of the chips does not make them infallible.

      Have her accidentally run it through the microwave for a few seconds. I believe you'll find more satisfactory results. Or not..., depends on what "satisfies" you.

    3. Re:Hack / Jailbreak This by bytesex · · Score: 1

      She'd get hot ?

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    4. Re:Hack / Jailbreak This by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Uhh, no. Nine times out of ten you'd be correct, I am generally the idiot, but in this particular case I told her, "don't wash those, my passport is still in there", which she agrees she forgot. But I agree with the "FTFY" - - she FTFY'd the RFID tag in the process.

      --
      Gently reply
  15. Stop the Coupons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just lower your damn price!

    1. Re:Stop the Coupons! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      But then there'd be no excuse to push tracker technology and sell newspapers! Think of the lost sales, friend, the lost sales!

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Stop the Coupons! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this.

      The only thing a coupon tells me is simply that your prices are too high. If it wasn't, you could not afford giving me a lower price. If that's not a good enough reason NOT to go to your store, I don't know what is.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Who do i invoice ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    for using my data communications processing service ?
    ii have costs, electricity, device wear and tear, commercial reading services ?

    you thought i was just giving you that data for free ? think again chump

    1. Re:Who do i invoice ? by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1

      How many 'free aps' do you have on your smartphone? How much did you pay for your internet browser?

  17. The submitter is a moron by klingens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is an improved GPS chip, allowing a phone to pinpoint its location even when GPS is spotty.
    Shopkeepers won't get the data, even if the phone companies would be allowed to sell location data cause there is no ROI: not enough people will have such a chip to even make it worthwhile. Neither do they need data that detailed. As some other poster already wrote: they'd rather know how much money the customer has, not where he is right now. Both, the have not and the billionaire can watch the same Mercedes 600SL or Smart car with their phone in their pocket. Doesn't tell the shopowner who can actually afford the luxury car.

    What can happen is that the government subpoenas the telco location data for a subscribe just like they do now and that the better accuracy helps them to pinpoint the location of the subscribe better. This can be used for "OMG evil gubmint!" or it can be used, probably a lot less of course, for finding a missing person e.g. inside an avalanche.

    Of course without deliberately wrong sensationalism like this, the pagehits aren't coming.

    1. Re:The submitter is a moron by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Skimming TFA, I see nothing about surveillance, or reporting someone's location back to any Big Brother entity. It talks about a nice new chip that can use many different resources including GPS, WiFi SSIDs, Bluetooth beacons, and dead reckoning to accurately determine location in adverse circumstances. The only reference to the retail industry at all is this:

      "The use case [for Bluetooth beacons] might be malls," says Pomerantz. "It would be a good investment for a mall to put up a deployment—perhaps put them up every 100 yards, and then unlock the ability for people walking around mall to get very precise couponing information."

      So I can walk around a mall, and my phone will tell me that the restaurant I just passed is having a special. Wow. I'm terrified by the implications here. I might actually have to exercise some willpower!

      The summary is utter sensationalist crap.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:The submitter is a moron by kenh · · Score: 2

      And if every shop participates, your "device" will never stop vibrating, and you will soon turn it off - information overload. I pass by many more stores than I stop in, and no discount imaginable would suffice to get me into Yankee Candles or Talbots...

      --
      Ken
  18. Why? by linuxdude96 · · Score: 0

    Why would i want this chip? And who would put in their products? Will it not make the products less appealing?

    1. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You haven't been on this planet too long, have you?

      Who will want this? People who prefer paying a few bucks less on an overpriced product to having a privacy. In other words, pretty much every idiot out there.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. The pitch for his product is wrong. by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're saying it would be great for merchants to know where you are but I'd actually have to carry it and keep it charged for it to work. So it has to offer me a benefit and instant coupons or getting bombarded by ads isn't a good selling point.

    A better application for this would be urban GPS. A big problem with current GPS is that it doesn't work in dense urban cities. Try to use GPS in New York... it's almost useless. First off, you're underground half the time. Second, even when you're above ground you tend to be amongst big buildings that obscure the sky. However, I get great cellphone reception pretty much anywhere in New York and wifi hotspots are pretty ubiquitous even if they're mostly locked. If your mobile navigation could make use of other static radio signals for navigation then GPS would work deep within the urban jungle. And THAT is valuable.

    The pitch of "oh merchants can predict your location" is asinine. if you wanted to sell the tracking feature then I suppose this would work for tracking boxes. After all, existing tracking technology that relies on GPS won't work in warehouses, underground, or even inside of industrial shipping containers. But something that could triangulate cell towers should work just about damn near anywhere there is "civilization"...

    All and all, a neat little chip and I wish it well. Whoever is coming up with the applications for it needs to be smacked around a little with a frozen trout.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      They're saying it would be great for merchants to know where you are but I'd actually have to carry it and keep it charged for it to work.

      Just like your mobile phone... Right?

    2. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by Karmashock · · Score: 0

      Why would I willingly let my cellphone tell them that?

      Think about it.

      The pitch is stupid. that doesn't offer the consumer an incentive to give away that sort of information. If we were getting something for it, fine. But we're not giving it away for free.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usable for targeting in general. Guided missiles, computer assisted rifle targeting, setting off bombs when two or more specific signals in appropriate range of each other,,,,

      Investigative uses abound as well,,,

      Model 666 on its way to everyone's bodies soon! You can locate your child with this! Think of your children!

    4. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      If the merchants were on the ball they would have real people wandering around their stores helping customers. Then they wouldn't need technology to bombard us with ads. If a sales person points out a special to me, or brings another product to my attention, I won't mind.

      I did a lot of work a few years ago with assisted GPS, that used both GPS and the cellphone network to determine location. I did one test where I was driving around a parkade in downtown Seattle. The assisted cellphone fixes were spot on. The GPS fixes were - literally - all over the map. The I drove along the nastiest urban canyon I could find (under the monorail), and out the I-90 bridge/tunnel, with all the big underpasses and things that confused every other GPS.

      Our stuff basically worked, but our marketing person still managed to bankrupt the company. That was another matter. It was fun while it lasted.

      ...laura

    5. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking it would be a hobbyists dream - it's got virtually everything you need in the way of sensors built in. DIY autopilots will love it!

    6. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incentives eh? Oh, I got some good ones! How about .. a one buck chocolate bar in exchange for unlimited, perpetual 24/7 tracking of your location. Most of 'em will go for that. If there are too many refuseniks we can always make the tracking mandatory as part of the 'Protecting Children And Kittens From Pedo Terrist Pirate Act' or something. Your privacy in exchange for not being incarcerated! Sounds like a good deal to me!

    7. Re:The pitch for his product is wrong. by toxonix · · Score: 1

      Well, the marketing and product people are either way behind the engineering dept, out for drinks, incompetent, or completely out of ideas. It's likely that all 4 are in effect, possibly more. Most advances in technology now are weakly pushed by either an advertising or social media based application.

  20. Yay coupons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that jazz just to give you coupons? Rube Goldberg lives on.

    1. Re:Yay coupons! by kenh · · Score: 1

      Because big banners in the shop windows are useless at communicating with shoppers, right?

      --
      Ken
  21. Living in the past much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    We have 2012. Only retards leave their house to do shopping.

    The whole idea of
    1) taking a shower
    2) getting dressed
    3) putting shoes on
    4) driving a bike, car, tram
    5) get into a shop
    6) chose from the little they have to offer
    7) standing in line
    8) paying for the products you chose
    9) leaving shop
    10) getting home
    11) shit doesn't work
    12) back to 4).. ...is like.. the past, dude..

    education is expensive... so we better tag stupid people with chips.. because we want to know where they are and what they are doing...

  22. Or you can make your own, this came out in 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://obex.parallax.com/objects/713/ Here it is, open source and open design, to boot.

  23. This is public data anyway by concealment · · Score: 2

    I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy walking down the street. I have it in my home, or another person's home if I trust that person. Expecting that stores and service providers will give me this same courtesy is foolishness. It also seems that if I turn off my cell phone and laptop, I'll be invisible to this magic chip as well. Only the shadow knows.

    1. Re:This is public data anyway by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy walking down the street.

      You do, however, have the reasonable expectation that strangers are not going to reach into your pockets and rifle through your personal effects.

      You also have a reasonable expectation that strangers are not going to follow you around and keep track of your every move. If they do, you can reasonably expect a LEO to at least question their behavior (especially if you are a minor and they are not).

      Sometimes I'm amazed at people's perception of privacy, and how they honestly believe it no longer exists the moment you step outside your residence.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:This is public data anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do wish people wouldn't make blanket statements like yours - PRIVACY IS NOT limited to PHYSICAL privacy, but also privacy of state of mind, privacy of thoughts, and privacy of belongings.

  24. More BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Comercial world already invades our privacy and lives enough as it is. insurance companies track your driving, and lets not forget the government stormtroopers that will track you down anytime they don't like you talking about a specific subject.

    And for all of those that think "You have nothing to hide if your not doing anything wrong", remember the Jews said the same thing in Nazi Germany and look where they ended up.

    Time to take extreme measures and block all unauthorized communications such as your cell phone (and its hidden apps), and your credit cards, and ID, your car, and anything else you can think of. You will need to test your shielding also.

  25. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems like a power hog with all the radios in it also there are building where the cell phone signal is poor and GPS may not work in them as well.

    Yes, but it's also got gyroscopes, accelerometers, step counters, and altimeters -- though I suppose you could be dancing a jig in a hyperbaric chamber with high vibration somewhere in that building with poor mobile and GPS signals?

  26. Other use cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why malls? The hardware seems to be great! The chip might provide better navigation, it has more input sources which any sane implementation can turn into higher accuracy, with better availability & faster response times.
    It just needs an on/off switch for the beacon or a broadcast-nothing mode to address privacy concerns.

  27. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

    Radio receivers? I thought they in themselves were cheap (power wise). I thought it was the transmitters that were power hungry, I think receivers will be fine.

    --
    Never happened. True story.
  28. Alarmist much? by gmarsh · · Score: 1

    Unless they're implanting this fucking chip in you, the big brother implication of this chip is pretty much bullshit.

    It has one damn good application - reliable navigation, indoors and out. Suppose you've just arrived in Montreal and don't know a thing about the place, but you want to hit up Schwartz's for the sandwich and a pickle that everyone's told you to try. Now your phone can direct you to the nearest subway station, direct you to the correct platform so you don't take the train in the wrong direction, tell you when to get off the train, transfer you to a bus, and drop you off for some kosher deliciousness without having to ask anyone for directions. (Which in Montreal, will either get you told off in French, or you'll end up getting directed to the "club with the best girls" instead of where you want to go..)

  29. As advertising, works until... by jitterman · · Score: 1

    I could see this working as it does in some films, but eventually, just like with anything else, the "Ooh shiny!" factor wears off, and people will tune them (ads, discount offers, etc) out the same way we do regular ads, rough language on TV (compared to what was allowed a few decades ago in the US), and so on. Not that it won't have an effect at all, but our passive filters will adapt.

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  30. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. Receiving costs about as much as transmitting (power wise).

  31. Let's think this through by kenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, so I've got a device in my pocket - a cellphone, call it a tablet, whatever - and as I walk through the mall it vibrates with special offers from each retailer I pass in front of - how long do I leave this "feature" enabled? Two, three stores? The fact that the device is "smart" and will deduce from my facebook status of "single" and that I'm male that I'm not interested in offers from Yankee Candle, Bed, Bath and Beyond or Victoria's Secret doesn't really help much...

    It will be the most disabled "feature" on personal devices, and will sink any product where the device is subsidised by the alerts.

    I see a great market in the "I've fallen and I can't get up" device market - concerned children will buy them for their elderly parents who are still living independently, and let's not forget the "where's my kid" market segment, but this location-based direct marketing is a dumb idea. period.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Let's think this through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so I've got a device in my pocket - a cellphone, call it a tablet, whatever - and as I walk through the mall it vibrates with special offers from each retailer I pass in front of - how long do I leave this "feature" enabled? Two, three stores?

      You think there will be a "disable" button? I envy the alternative universe you live in - beam me up!

    2. Re:Let's think this through by dargaud · · Score: 2

      You think there will be a "disable" button?

      There better be. Or the guy who sold it to me will enjoy the same hardware through his anus.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    3. Re:Let's think this through by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      OK, so I've got a device in my pocket - a cellphone, call it a tablet, whatever - and as I walk through the mall it vibrates with special offers from each retailer I pass in front of - how long do I leave this "feature" enabled? Two, three stores? The fact that the device is "smart" and will deduce from my facebook status of "single" and that I'm male that I'm not interested in offers from Yankee Candle, Bed, Bath and Beyond or Victoria's Secret doesn't really help much...

      It will be the most disabled "feature" on personal devices, and will sink any product where the device is subsidised by the alerts.

      I see a great market in the "I've fallen and I can't get up" device market - concerned children will buy them for their elderly parents who are still living independently, and let's not forget the "where's my kid" market segment, but this location-based direct marketing is a dumb idea. period.

      how long? about a day.

      Bluetooth - bluetooth was the perfect technology for localized alarms and buzzes and .. well, SPAM. it was tried already.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Let's think this through by Bigby · · Score: 1

      I think they would be wiser and only beep you when you walk into a store, stay in one general place for a while, and then leave without going to the register. You are then an engaged customer, seriously considering a purchase.

  32. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by mikael · · Score: 1

    Samsung Galaxy II does the GPS / Wi-Fi geolocation bit. Google put together a list of all the WiFi hotspots in the world and uses that to augment GPS. Makes me wonder whether these phones are calling home with all the WiFi zones they have detected.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  33. Article is overblown / Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this all sounds good and true. The article takes BC's statement of WiFi integration allowed as WiFi integration provided. This is just a multi-constellation GNSS chip. It MAY have an engine to make use of WiFi / Cell tower integrated to the chip, but it doesn't have the DB, so, in short, already been done elsewhere (can anyone say iPhone?).

    What this does do is make it less power consuming than most other chips, so that is nice... but aside from that... PR speak.

  34. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by daktari · · Score: 1

    Sweet! I am so getting into the tinfoil overall business. Just think of all the people who would care about this very issue! Oh wait...

    If I could mod you up past 5/funny, I would. Thanks for making us laugh.

    --
    A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees. -- Willam Blake
  35. No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your 6150 can't provide the FCC-mandated support for 911 geolocation so any US carrier detecting it in their network will ban its IMEI to avoid being fined by the FCC.

    Funny how they "can't" ban stolen phones to protect their customers but they can do it to protect their own pocketbook...

  36. arth1 "wanted 4 murder" (of the English language) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. Just What I Never Wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this benefit the end user?

  38. Not for free; for google navigation app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you won't give your geolocation information away for free. You will continue to trade it for the services provided by your phone's Google Navigation app like you do today.

    You *did* read the google nav app's current terms of service that say you agree to give your geolocation data to Google even when your phobe's GPS is disabled, right??

  39. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by Mysticeti · · Score: 1

    Get ready for the "bite my shiny tinfoil ass" Futurama jokes.

  40. The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

  41. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

    I thought, I thought, I think I'm wrong :).

    I promise to never make this mistake again.

    Hmmm, seems my thoughts and reality are, well, different :)... I've always believed (I don't know why) that transmitting cost orders of magnitude more energy than receiving radio waves.. I'm sure this is a common misconception, anyone care to explain why it's not true?

    --
    Never happened. True story.
  42. Sounds like the movie minority report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, there's no way this can be used for ill.

    1. Re:Sounds like the movie minority report by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's no way this can be used for ill.

      Congratulations, you have been walking the required daily distance in the hospital. You'll get extra Jell-O with supper tonight.

  43. Go - Away - Advertisements by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

    I'd rather them give me an app that scans barcodes and gives me the best deal / price. That way I can also receive their competitors coupons.
    Oh wait, that exists.

    No, I do NOT want EXTRA ways to be BOMBARDED EVERYWHERE I GO WITH UR CHITTY OVERPRICED MERCHANDISE.

    It has nothing to do with coupons to save you money, either. If they could be promised a way to advertise fake low prices to you instantly then they would raise the prices and the 'coupon' price would be regular price. They just want a new excuse to throw ads in your face nonstop about their products.

    I've worked in stores that put things 'on sale' and their price actually goes up. It also has a false original price too. Maybe when it was brand new it was that prices months ago but it certainly wasn't before the sale.

  44. Pitched for advertising by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Why is it that everything has to be pitched as a new and better way to do advertising? Is it just because marketers have no imagination and all want to be the next Google, or is it that marketing has gotten so out of control that it wags the dog now? Maybe all the ad supported stuff on the Internet has allowed salesmen to finally take over the world.

    1. Re:Pitched for advertising by biodata · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes and yes

      --
      Korma: Good
  45. What kind of accuracy? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Nifty but are we talking 10 meter accuracy? 10 meters could mean the difference between Hot Dog on a Stick and Sbarro.

  46. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds wrong...so take AM/FM radio...let's say I have some multi-megawatt station. All my listeners need multi-megawatt pocket radios to listen?
    Or are you high?

  47. Be afraid, I am an employer by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    and I really want one of these to mount to a name tag....

    and I am not the only one with these desires.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  48. Umm... which half are you in? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    IQ is an average, not a median.

    therefore half the population is not necessarily under 100,

    their aggregate score on the other hand........

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  49. coupons, capitalist games and santorum redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. They are going to spend a fortune to give everyone a percentage point or two off an item.

    Wrong. They are going to continue to spend piss-pots full of your money (and give you back 3% of the 100% of your money that they took, in order to fool you into thinking you got a deal (people are easily fooled), when in fact your were reamed by them.

    Then they will take the 90% of the balance of your excess money to profits, to give the owners/shareholders (you know, the real customers) more profit and the other 10% of your money (remember, it is you who pays the extra costs - they take profit) and use it to lure other like-minded suckers with alleged "deals" (as in: "hey kid, have some free crack").

    It's just one of hundreds of tricks up their devious sleeves.

    Why not save the money and JUST LOWER THE PRICE OF THE ITEM.

    Because its a mind-game that has fuck-all to do with giving the money supplier (remember: that's YOU) a break.

    Game-playing is such a superior way to fool people into letting them be screwed. Businesses give it to you. And they always get their rewards out of you, their "sugar-daddy"(/ies).

    But they always give it to you "up the ass" and leave you broke, busted and feeling like you've been reamed in the end (LOL - an inadvertent "double-entendre").

    It's called "capitalism".

    Like the dimwit said "keep shoppin', folks".

    And pick up some Prep-H while you're out spendin' up a storm.

  50. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2

    So... THAT explains why folks are always depicted wearing shiny jumpsuits in those old sci-fi shows!!! Downright prophetic.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  51. Re:Be afraid, I am an employer by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

    Serious question: Why?

    Is it some sort of Machiavellian thing? Is there an actual reason for it?

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  52. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by skids · · Score: 1

    If it were just AM it would be different. Today's radio protocols require keeping a lot of oscillations going and a lot of math/analog processing to properly discard noise. (Both sides need crypto math, but the receiver side has to deal with actually filtering the coherent signal out of the babble, while the transmitter at worst just needs to find the right MIMO beamforming, do a simple encode, and pump it through the air.)

    The majority of access points use far more of the power budget for the software/OS than they do driving the antenna.

  53. Re:Be afraid, I am an employer by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    and I really want one of these to mount to a name tag....

    and I am not the only one with these desires.

    Starfleet badge.

  54. Problem is.... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    ..... spam works! I know, I know, but it always has and it always will.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  55. Well, technically... by javascriptjunkie · · Score: 1

    It's not actually a big brother chip unless it reads your thoughts too.

  56. this will be useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since there won't be any brick and mortar stores left by the time they get it working.

  57. One step closer by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    to the type of personally directed public advertising seen in Minority Report, but at least they aren't using eye scans to do it. Privacy is gone. Embrace the technology and use it to your advantage. No one is forcing you to buy anything at gunpoint. You still have the last word over your wallet when it comes to consumer product purchases.

  58. Your reasoning is like a collander by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "The only thing a coupon tells me is simply that your prices are too high. If it wasn't, you could not afford giving me a lower price. If that's not a good enough reason NOT to go to your store, I don't know what is."

    ... which tells me that you don't understand how a loss leader works. The idea is that coupons identify products that will be sold with little or no profit, and often even at a loss but are used to get customers in the store where they will inevitably purchase other items, as well as making impulse purchases. If store A has a product for $10.00 and store B has a coupon for the same product at $9.00 you would hopefully buy the item from store B rather than concluding that $10.00 is the better deal because no coupon is involved. Of course, YMMV ;-)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  59. Turning off GPS tracking will be meaningless by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    As I posted only weeks ago, this means that even if you turn off your phone, or the GPS tracking, or even walk under a radio shield of some kind, the phone will extrapolate where you are based on your last verified map-pin by using solid state gyroscope, clock, and 3-axis accelerometer. The only need for radio will be to correct inevitable errors.
    Turning off the bloody phone, or "turning off the GPS", or putting it in a steel box, or perhaps even removing the user-accessible battery (there'll be a backup, guaranteed) won't stop it from tracking you. Sales my tired soul, this is DHS tracking.

    1. Re:Turning off GPS tracking will be meaningless by DamageLabs · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for us, and very fortunately for our tracking overlords, the user accessible battery is dangerously close to becoming a sabre toothed tiger.
      I am almost certain that they will be completely extinct in phones with this chip.

      Welcome to the future, where more tech that you own is used against you than is working for you.

  60. Re:No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have the carriers actually implemented e911? Last I heard anything they had obtained an indefinite waiver for it, since they all claimed it was too expensive to implement and wouldn't work anyway.

  61. Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This chip is a terrorist wet dream. Imagine blowing a package up exactly were you want it inside the building without any remote control or a line of sight. Priceless!

  62. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by miknix · · Score: 1

    Time for tinfoil overalls.

    At least it will be a shiny future.

    Great!!! I can finally dress my astronaut suit without looking awkward in the streets. I'm looking forward for that future.

  63. Re:shop keeper by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Minority Report, here we come!

    But congrats to you for finding a fourth engine of tracking that I hadn't yet fully realized - sales. So then all that info is around "to make your shopping experience better". Yet you insightfully put the quotes around "shop keeper" because besides the actual shop keepers, there's tons of room for any two bit mall kiosk operator (I'm not even counting the total fakers) to apply for that info, then they have less obligation to keep up a good name than the big name shops. Then of course are the really sleazy operators, who fake the shop part entirely and social-engineer their way into the data for black hat reasons.

    And yes, then that info will be cross sold to the .gov crowd to "help keep us safer from terrorists".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  64. Better, non-marketing uses by AlexB892 · · Score: 1

    As much as I dislike the marketing application being discussed for this chip, there are other things it would be great for. As a firefighter, I'd love to have one of these integrated into my gear. Currently if a firefighter goes down and isn't moving, their PASS alarm will sound, so that other firefighters within hearing distance can find them. But what if you fall through a floor in a burning building and get separated from your crew? Wouldn't it be great to automatically transmit to the crews outside not only the fact that you need help, but precisely where that help should be sent? The same could be said for police officers, soldiers, or any other high-risk workers who might suddenly find themselves in need of backup.

  65. Re:seems like a power hog with all the radios in i by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Not a problem. They "watched" you walk up to the hyperbaric chamber, so that's not going to help you. "They" aren't stupid, and will have a lot of AI and their own personal experience to figure out why the readings went off into Narnia for a few minutes. In a decade or two, trying to mess with the tracker will be a felony, anyway, if people become too annoyingly successful at beating it. (plasma separator centrifuge would be funny, or a model rocket, or a quad copter, or tying it to a wild wolf... so many options).

  66. Politicians Phone by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    So if you ever find the phone of a politician (or another worker for the state security organs) that is equipped with this chip, be sure to leave it in the nearest adult book store.

  67. Re:No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who has recently implemented a 911 center I can tell you that you're close but mistaken. The carriers have most definitely implemented e911 ... It is most 911 centers that have yet to implement support for e911.

    There wasnt a mandate so there just wasn't funding to stand up e911 support at the 911 centers. Not even new ones in major metropolitan areas

  68. Frankly, who brought the "Privacy" angle in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article, as well as from the preliminary data sheets, this is effectively a better GPS chip, including "sideband" data like GSM towers, known Wifi locations, acceleration data and all that stuff. That's all.
    So why do some low-level eggheads immediately cry "wolf" and imagine the worst possible abuse for it?
    If you're looking from the ad pov, they'll push ads for anything in 2 miles reach, so it's useless anyway...

    OTOH, i should start selling gyroscopic, oil-damped tin foil phone covers... Get them while they're still legal!!!!1!!
    Or, tin-foil-covered rubber ball covers - if you want to mislead THEM, just throw it down a stair and watch it bounce... ;-)
    Seriously - what's the point?

  69. Re:No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect y by JavaBear · · Score: 1

    It is funny though. as they can already pinpoint any cellphone to an accuracy of less than 100m with the technology available from the beginning of cellphones.
    And they can do so as soon as it is switched on, they can/and do get the information as soon as you hit dial..

  70. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by arisvega · · Score: 1

    Your tin foil hats will protect you no more! Mwahahahaha!

    Tin foil is irrelevant. What is relevant, is:

    predicated on the fact that shopkeepers will know the moment you walk by their front door, or when you are looking at a particular product,

    Maybe shopkeepers have a higher chance of me buying something if they leave me the fuck alone, and not swarm me like flies in shit "the moment I walk by their front door".

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  71. Re:Be afraid, I am an employer by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    staff tracking? like around an amusement park, cruise ship, movie theater or a motel?

    if I can see staff members aren't sweeping out theater 5 each night after the middle show but hanging out tiwht the cute blonde in the office? yea.. that's valuable with this kind of tracking...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  72. Re:Be afraid, I am an employer by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

    I guess that makes sense, though I would think video cameras (which are already ubitquitous) would perform the same function, and already be in place.

    Also, for some reason, I initially pictured you working at EA or Sony.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  73. Targted ads for products by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    That i will do my best to avoid. Anytime i get unwelcome ads, i refuse to do business with those companies again and take my money to their competition.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  74. Re:No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect y by locopuyo · · Score: 2

    Wrong! It takes several minutes for super computers to do the super advanced triangulation math and sound affects associated with it. And if they hang up before the calculations are done the data is lost forever!

  75. Electronic Meat Slabs on Pegs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We need a program of psychosurgery and political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.
    The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective.
    Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain."

    Dr. Jose Delgado
    Director of Neuropsychiatry
    Yale University Medical School
    Congressional Record No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974