Slashdot Mirror


Company Designs "Big Brother Chip"

Taco Cowboy writes "Here comes a chip that can pinpoint you in-door and out, it can even tell others on which floor of a building you are located. It's the Broadcom 4752 chip. It takes signals from global navigation satellites, cell phone towers, and Wi-Fi hot spots, coupled with input from gyroscopes, accelerometers, step counters, and altimeters The company calls abilities like this 'ubiquitous navigation,' and the idea is that it will enable a new kind of e-commerce predicated on the fact that shopkeepers will know the moment you walk by their front door, or when you are looking at a particular product, and can offer you coupons at that instant."

30 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Potato, potato by samazon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you say "coupons" I hear "pushy advertisements."

    --
    I have the hiccups.
    1. Re:Potato, potato by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      The money is being spent because it is profitable to spend it.
      These companies are not out there trowing their money away. They are investing.
      Just because you would hate it and see through the shiny coupon to the advertisement and rebel does not mean that most people will.
      Most people are fucking cattle. Cattle are profitable.Coupon! Must spend money.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:Potato, potato by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 2

      My favorite phrase to hear after a co-worker, family member (or even once my wife) goes shopping, "I had to buy it, I saved sooooo much money on it," or, "I had to spend $x to save $x. But who can pass that up? Look at how much I saved!!!"

      You do realize that a better way to save money is to not spend it in the first place, right? People that purchase an item only because of the 'deal' they get on it are cattle. People that shop smart and look for coupons/deals/discounts on something they need anyway are smart. The breakdown comes because we've been trained to believe that wants are now needs.

    3. Re:Potato, potato by s0nicfreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many reasons, including but not limited to: If you like the product, you may buy another when you don't have a coupon. You may recommend it to friends, who may buy it without the coupon. Many people think they are too cool to use coupons, and will purposely forgo the coupons.

    4. Re:Potato, potato by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      You do realize that a better way to save money is to not spend it in the first place, right?

      Do you realize that every Keynesian economist that read that is having a heart-attack now? Shame on you!

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Potato, potato by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      When I try to bargain a price down and receive the 'Oh you're one of those hagglers' attitudes

      Well, aside from car and home purchases....what else is out there that you can negotiate price on?

      I can think of some services, but actual things to purchase, I can't really think of anything out there....?

      What all purchases do you haggle over price on (services not included)?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by burne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time for tinfoil overalls.

    At least it will be a shiny future.

  3. but only if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    you have the chip on you - otherwise, piss off

    1. Re:but only if by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2

      If we can make these chips mandatory to Jeovah Witnesses so we can predict when they are about to knock at our door, it would be a great life improvement.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
  4. Not exactly a new threat, but... by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "one-stop-shopping" nature of the chip is chilling. Consider, Broadcom has seen enough of a market to warrant developing a sophisticated device, the stated purpose of which is to determine it's position and "phone home" with that information. Worse yet, it will also phone in all the personal details about you that it has access to, so that those "coupons" can be quickly crafted. If that's not scary enough, consider that also available to any given "shop keeper", is a list of all the other shops you've visited, and when. Still not bugged enough? Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

    1. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by daktari · · Score: 2

      Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      More dangerous than merchants? Is that even possible?

      Looks like another example of technology catching up with our greed.

      --
      A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees. -- Willam Blake
    2. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      The "one-stop-shopping" nature of the chip is chilling. Consider, Broadcom has seen enough of a market to warrant developing a sophisticated device, the stated purpose of which is to determine it's position and "phone home" with that information. Worse yet, it will also phone in all the personal details about you that it has access to, so that those "coupons" can be quickly crafted. If that's not scary enough, consider that also available to any given "shop keeper", is a list of all the other shops you've visited, and when. Still not bugged enough? Think about this technology in the hands of entities far more dangerous than merchants; law enforcement, for example.

      And you'll even be stuck with the bills for calls/SMS/data as the phone reports your whereabouts which are then passed on to nearby merchants or watchful agencies. And perhaps also for the calls/SMS/data returned as so-called coupons or comforting security notifications ("wait there, an officer has been dispatched" or "you're not allowed to enter that movie theater").

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    3. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFS is highly misleading. The chip doesn't "phone home" or give data to marketers. It is just an integration of existing phone tech to reduce cost and power consumption. Just like current phones any snooping will be software controlled by the vendor.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Not exactly a new threat, but... by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      Your statement isn't even misleading. It's intentionally obtuse. Of course the chip doesn't phone home. It passes the tracking info to the phone itself, which of course can both log and transmit your trail to whomever has the power to ask for it. It's like saying a gun doesn't kill. Well, technically, a human has to pull the trigger (+4 Informative).
      I don't know why so many people try to obfuscate the obvious. They, and that's a broad freaking THEY, want to track everyone. Except business owners (that'd be communistic), the very wealthy, law enforcement, Homeland Security, and those who make the laws, of course.

  5. !new by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Japanese mobile phones have had this for a while. Personal navigation apps that can guide you through underground stations and inside buildings using wifi and accelerometers when GPS is unavailable.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Engineering oppression by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Growing up in the 80s, living through the boom times of the 90s, and looking back today. What I used to think was was a path to freedom and salvation of the intellectual variety, I now see as our oppression. Slavery of a new type. Step by step we are sealing our own doom while at the same time handing over the keys to a new elite. The social consolidation is giving rise to the new aristocrats.

    I really hope I'm wrong.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Engineering oppression by gottspeed · · Score: 2

      No, you're right, but don't worry; Its the way of things. This situation can't be avoided. There are more smart people than dumb people, its why elite do their best to rise to the top, they know what happens when you don't.

    2. Re:Engineering oppression by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, from my history book I learned what happens after they piss off the peasants too much.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. circumvention by mug+funky · · Score: 5, Funny

    wet a towel and wrap it round your head.

    then get your ass to Mars.

  8. Hack / Jailbreak This by retroworks · · Score: 2

    My wife accidentally ran my new passport with its RFID tag through the washing machine. I still get through customs. The existence of the chips does not make them infallible.

    --
    Gently reply
  9. The submitter is a moron by klingens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is an improved GPS chip, allowing a phone to pinpoint its location even when GPS is spotty.
    Shopkeepers won't get the data, even if the phone companies would be allowed to sell location data cause there is no ROI: not enough people will have such a chip to even make it worthwhile. Neither do they need data that detailed. As some other poster already wrote: they'd rather know how much money the customer has, not where he is right now. Both, the have not and the billionaire can watch the same Mercedes 600SL or Smart car with their phone in their pocket. Doesn't tell the shopowner who can actually afford the luxury car.

    What can happen is that the government subpoenas the telco location data for a subscribe just like they do now and that the better accuracy helps them to pinpoint the location of the subscribe better. This can be used for "OMG evil gubmint!" or it can be used, probably a lot less of course, for finding a missing person e.g. inside an avalanche.

    Of course without deliberately wrong sensationalism like this, the pagehits aren't coming.

    1. Re:The submitter is a moron by kenh · · Score: 2

      And if every shop participates, your "device" will never stop vibrating, and you will soon turn it off - information overload. I pass by many more stores than I stop in, and no discount imaginable would suffice to get me into Yankee Candles or Talbots...

      --
      Ken
  10. The pitch for his product is wrong. by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're saying it would be great for merchants to know where you are but I'd actually have to carry it and keep it charged for it to work. So it has to offer me a benefit and instant coupons or getting bombarded by ads isn't a good selling point.

    A better application for this would be urban GPS. A big problem with current GPS is that it doesn't work in dense urban cities. Try to use GPS in New York... it's almost useless. First off, you're underground half the time. Second, even when you're above ground you tend to be amongst big buildings that obscure the sky. However, I get great cellphone reception pretty much anywhere in New York and wifi hotspots are pretty ubiquitous even if they're mostly locked. If your mobile navigation could make use of other static radio signals for navigation then GPS would work deep within the urban jungle. And THAT is valuable.

    The pitch of "oh merchants can predict your location" is asinine. if you wanted to sell the tracking feature then I suppose this would work for tracking boxes. After all, existing tracking technology that relies on GPS won't work in warehouses, underground, or even inside of industrial shipping containers. But something that could triangulate cell towers should work just about damn near anywhere there is "civilization"...

    All and all, a neat little chip and I wish it well. Whoever is coming up with the applications for it needs to be smacked around a little with a frozen trout.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  11. This is public data anyway by concealment · · Score: 2

    I don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy walking down the street. I have it in my home, or another person's home if I trust that person. Expecting that stores and service providers will give me this same courtesy is foolishness. It also seems that if I turn off my cell phone and laptop, I'll be invisible to this magic chip as well. Only the shadow knows.

  12. Let's think this through by kenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, so I've got a device in my pocket - a cellphone, call it a tablet, whatever - and as I walk through the mall it vibrates with special offers from each retailer I pass in front of - how long do I leave this "feature" enabled? Two, three stores? The fact that the device is "smart" and will deduce from my facebook status of "single" and that I'm male that I'm not interested in offers from Yankee Candle, Bed, Bath and Beyond or Victoria's Secret doesn't really help much...

    It will be the most disabled "feature" on personal devices, and will sink any product where the device is subsidised by the alerts.

    I see a great market in the "I've fallen and I can't get up" device market - concerned children will buy them for their elderly parents who are still living independently, and let's not forget the "where's my kid" market segment, but this location-based direct marketing is a dumb idea. period.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Let's think this through by dargaud · · Score: 2

      You think there will be a "disable" button?

      There better be. Or the guy who sold it to me will enjoy the same hardware through his anus.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  13. No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your 6150 can't provide the FCC-mandated support for 911 geolocation so any US carrier detecting it in their network will ban its IMEI to avoid being fined by the FCC.

    Funny how they "can't" ban stolen phones to protect their customers but they can do it to protect their own pocketbook...

  14. Re:Get ready for it, Slashtards. by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2

    So... THAT explains why folks are always depicted wearing shiny jumpsuits in those old sci-fi shows!!! Downright prophetic.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  15. Turning off GPS tracking will be meaningless by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    As I posted only weeks ago, this means that even if you turn off your phone, or the GPS tracking, or even walk under a radio shield of some kind, the phone will extrapolate where you are based on your last verified map-pin by using solid state gyroscope, clock, and 3-axis accelerometer. The only need for radio will be to correct inevitable errors.
    Turning off the bloody phone, or "turning off the GPS", or putting it in a steel box, or perhaps even removing the user-accessible battery (there'll be a backup, guaranteed) won't stop it from tracking you. Sales my tired soul, this is DHS tracking.

  16. Re:No 911 gps support = carriers will disconnect y by locopuyo · · Score: 2

    Wrong! It takes several minutes for super computers to do the super advanced triangulation math and sound affects associated with it. And if they hang up before the calculations are done the data is lost forever!