Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: The Very Best Paper Airplane?

An anonymous reader writes "'The Harrier' (or 'Eastern star,' as it is also called), is very well known, and is considered to be one of the best paper airplane designs. After much searching and trying, I have not found a better plane. So, I am asking Slashdot: is there anything that beats 'The Harrier' in a competition (indoors or outdoors)? This would be a really nice geek skill!"

183 comments

  1. Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The harrier is 1980s technology. Try a F35-B joint strike fighter STOVL variant. Folding instructions are a bit behind schedule and over budget still.

    1. Re:Outdated by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Funny

      The F35-B only uses one sheet of paper, and we have to have two sheets to fly properly in Canada's arctic weather.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Apparently our Defense Minister can make the single sheet solution work reliably by sheer force of will.

    3. Re:Outdated by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1
      It's from the 1960s.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawker_Siddeley_Harrier

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    4. Re:Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I thought our government was three sheets to the wind when they decided to buy the damn things.

    5. Re:Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only that, the up to the date web technology is way behind the simple line drawings used in the dead tree instruction books on folding paper
      This guy doesn't understand that a photograph is NOT good for conveying info; unlike a drawing , it is hard to highlight the impt things

    6. Re:Outdated by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Where would they get three sheets? They're at least one mast short of a full ship.

    7. Re:Outdated by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      Then it would be Three Sheets To The Wind

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    8. Re:Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "one-off", and you really didn't need that semicolon. A comma would have served better. I wouldn't have mentioned these, but you called someone a retard and so I thought that you might appreciate some criticism yourself.

    9. Re:Outdated by Swampash · · Score: 1

      A misnomer then, because I was making paper planes using the "Harrier" design in 1977.

    10. Re:Outdated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for $19,000, you could own a trainer. At $3000 per fuel load, I don't think it'll get much air time, but oh how heads would roll if you overflew Cuba at Mach 1.2.

    11. Re:Outdated by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1
      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    12. Re:Outdated by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Only if he takes a break from misusing military aircraft for personal transportation needs.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    13. Re:Outdated by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      ...if you overflew Cuba at Mach 1.2.

      Good luck on that - the Hunter is a subsonic airplane (max. speed ~Mach 0.94).

    14. Re:Outdated by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      Despite you disregarding what I said about one-off, I do appreciate your criticism.

    15. Re:Outdated by tmh+-+The+Mad+Hacker · · Score: 1

      Only two? I heard you had to be three sheets to the wind in order to survive a Canadian winter.

  2. I made a Saturn V once by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    But it kept deflagrating on the pad.

    1. Re:I made a Saturn V once by Genda · · Score: 3, Funny

      She initiated deflagration to which he exploded in premature ignition!!!

  3. Ask the mythbusters by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They can test out ideas in a cool way.

    1. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be the myth?

    2. Re:Ask the mythbusters by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. They will test out which paper plane travels the furthest by considering a number of different launch techniques, one of which will inevitable be being propelled by the force of an explosion.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:Ask the mythbusters by TexVex · · Score: 2

      One of my top three episodes is the one with the water heater rockets. Another is the one where the moribund cement truck gets vaporized.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    4. Re:Ask the mythbusters by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think you missed the obvious anagram "HALT! SODS".

      (This is the real trial for the slashdot moderation system. Is there any way I can be modded both Off Topic and Informative?)

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    5. Re:Ask the mythbusters by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it is hard to define what a 'plane' is

      If we are talking about something that is made of paper and can travel as far as possible when thrown, then piece of paper compressed into a ball will win hands down

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    6. Re:Ask the mythbusters by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      That makes about as much sense as saying that a cannon ball can stay in flight longer than a hang glider.

    7. Re:Ask the mythbusters by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I love MB but it has hosted some of the absolute worst science I have ever seen.

    8. Re:Ask the mythbusters by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      posting to undo comment mod - sorry 'bout that.

    9. Re:Ask the mythbusters by MiG82au · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit. The paper plane throw record is 69 m. Try match that with your paper ball. You can definitely exclude a ball from the definition of "plane". It follows a ballistic trajectory because it doesn't generate lift.

    10. Re:Ask the mythbusters by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      That was sort of what I was talking about. They'll take any activity, and find some way to work an explosion into it, regardless of the scientific necessity.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    11. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They test idioms and poorly CGI'd viral videos these days. I don't think it strictly has be a "myth" any longer.

    12. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean.

      I am an avid reader of historical fiction - especially nautical historical fiction. I also love to read original texts [well, reproductions], autobiographies, and journals of sailors and captains from the golden age of sail - around the very early 1800's.

      MB did an episode where they tested oak splinters as deadly projectiles from a cannon blast. I was so upset at their methodology and testing, and how they used it to draw conclusions.

      I could (and did) send numerous primary document cites of actual sailors writing about actual people who died from battle generated splinters. It was a real threat. I thought of so many possible scenarios that they didn't test, for example:

      a. I think they tested a few handfuls of shots. A real naval battle easily lasted an entire day, or more. The Battle of Trafalgar (which they used to teach about in schools all over the Western world) had 50 ships of the line not including 5th or 6th rate frigates. Each of those with 2 or 3 decks, with guns on both sides. The British flagship was a 100-gun monster, 50 on each side.

      b. In an actual naval battle, a 'rolling broadside" is a rippling cascade of gun fire. A well practiced gun crew around 1805 could fire and load every 3 or 4 minutes. That's 25 shots a minute, or a shot every 2 or 3 seconds.

      c. It's entirely probable that an enemy ship could take broadsides from multiple ships. In the same battle, the flagship HMS Victory was under fire from 5 ships - over 400 canons being brought to bear for 40 minutes. The French ship Redoutable was virtually destroyed from fire of two different British battleships - estimated to have taken 2,000 shots.

      d. Finally, whatever size canon they used, it was comically small. On top of that, the assumption that closer is better is not the case. A great long canon fires a ballistic trajectory, with it's impact speed higher than it's initial muzzle velocity. It looked like perhaps they used a 12 pound shot. Maybe an 18 pounder tops. The HMS Victory, for example, had 30 x 32 pounders, and even some 68 pounders.

    13. Re:Ask the mythbusters by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Hey! After all, their mantra is: "When in doubt - C4!" - How can that not involve explosions?

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    14. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On top of that, the assumption that closer is better is not the case. A great long canon fires a ballistic trajectory, with it's impact speed higher than it's initial muzzle velocity.

      Bullcrap. You did get more effect if shots are vertical not horizontal because the deck timbers are much thinner than the hull timbers, but the impact velocity will be less than the muzzle velocity. The effect was even more obvious in the age of the dreadnought, see the loss of HMS Hood in a long range battle against Bismarck.

      In the words of Lord Nelson "In this navy we obey Mr Newton's laws of motion".

      Oh, yes: its = belonging to it; it's = it is.

    15. Re:Ask the mythbusters by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      No problem, thanks. It's been interesting to watch the mod score on this one it has been bouncing all over the place.

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    16. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      The first episode of Mythbusters was the JATO rocket Chevy so viral videos aren't too far from their roots.

      --
      No sig today...
    17. Re:Ask the mythbusters by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "A great long canon fires a ballistic trajectory, with it's impact speed higher than it's initial muzzle velocity."
      Orly? the only way the cannon shell would gain speed from such a trajectory is if it dropped farther than it rose and I believe that both ships would be sitting on a medium that tends towards a certain amount of flatness. I'm willing to bet that any miniscule gain from this would be greatly outweighed by velocity lost due to air resistance.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    18. Re:Ask the mythbusters by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What would be the myth?

      That anyone over the age of eight actually gives a flying fuck about paper aeroplanes?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Ask the mythbusters by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Well, there was that one time they just BURNED the C4 to cook stuff over it, that didn't involve explosions...

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    20. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

      you know, that would be a very cool thing to see (or do!)

      --
      If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    21. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Comparing plunging fire into WWI battlecruisers vs. a 24 or 36 pounder is patently absurd. Your argument utterly fails.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    22. Re:Ask the mythbusters by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      If your definition of better paper plane is something that can stay in flight longer, than helium filled paper baloon will win hands down.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    23. Re:Ask the mythbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a paper plane that got caught in a gust of wind and went at least 100m

  4. Childs toys by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

    At least if going by the quality of this guide's description.

    'no fold the wings so that the wings come to the bottom and the bottom of the plane is quite slanted'
    'now you have you're finished plane'

  5. the bat by electrosoccertux · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.instructables.com/id/Awesome-paper-plane!!/

    due to its erratic flight, it let you use the full gymnasium, much more exciting than anything that flew in a straight line....

    1. Re:the bat by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is by far my favorite design. Great for letting loose in the office, and it's easily customizable. You can easily add ailerons with just a couple of scissor snips.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:the bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *love* this book.

      http://www.amazon.com/Worlds-Greatest-Paper-Airplane-Book/dp/0830628460/ref=sr_1_1

      There are at least 3 in there I like out of the 15 or so. One of them with a slight modification I got to go at least 200 ft (I and my friend were quite surprised at the result).

    3. Re:the bat by ChenLiWay · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In my life, I've thrown two of these that I tracked with my eyes for 5+ minutes that never came down.

      First was from ground level but in a downtown area. It caught the currents between the tall buildings and just kept going and I lost it after it crossed a street and I couldn't cross fast enough to follow.

      Second was from a 19th floor balcony. The two other paper plane designs my friends used fell to the ground in less than a minute. Mine reached about the 4th floor, caught an updraft from the hot asphalt streets, and never came down. It flew so high that it became a dot and eventually wasn't visible.

      Cliffs: this design is great for gliding and catching air currents, and will fly forever if it catches the right one. Throw outdoors for great fun.

    4. Re:the bat by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      hm throwing from a building, that's a great idea.

    5. Re:the bat by Rei · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that's kind of like what I made back in middle school. I had a design, which I've totally forgotten, which would every time you threw it go forward, rise up, stall, turn around, fly back just over your head and hit the person behind you. ;)

      --
      Virgin birth, water into wine; it's like Harry Potter, but it causes genocide and bad folk music.
    6. Re:the bat by sunderland56 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I prefer "The Great International Paper Airplane Book", by Mander/Dippel/Gossage (from 1968!):

      http://www.amazon.com/Great-International-Paper-Airplane-Book/dp/1578660289/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1334112956&sr=1-1

      Probably the first serious book on the subject, and a must-read if you're into paper airplanes.

    7. Re:the bat by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      we used to do those as kids. that's the best design. the harrier linked by the op might be better in straight line outdoors, but it looks horribly bad at lift per paper weight and horrible for stunts. also the bat(first time I've read the name though) can do stunts, loops etc. also the bat isn't ruined if it hits the wall.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:the bat by gknoy · · Score: 2

      I bet someone has thrown one while skydiving. ;)

    9. Re:the bat by JosKarith · · Score: 2

      When I was a kid we went to the Eiffel Tower. I might have had pockets full of paper planes for the event...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    10. Re:the bat by Turken · · Score: 1

      Nice to finally see an on-topic comment in this article.

      anyway, back to the paper airplanes... I've been folding the "harrier" design (linked in the original post) for years now. Only two modifications I'd suggest:

      1) For more of a glider, the final fold to form the wings should bring the edge of the paper well BELOW the bottom of the fuselage, so you have nice big wings and a smaller vertical portion. Just remember that as a glider, it needs a softer launch. experiment a bit to find the right balance between wing size and launch speed for the room you're in.

      2) for increased stability, put a good curve (or a light crease) in the wings, parallel to the fuselage.

    11. Re:the bat by onosson · · Score: 1

      Awesome book! Haven't seen it since I was a kid ... now I need to track down a copy.

      --
      ? syntax error
    12. Re:the bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just yep, this is the original, AND I bet I know which is his favorite, on the fly, best one, it's by anonymous source! hahaha
      You can tell I had that book. Had yes had, I don't know where it is anymore. boo whoo so sad, I'll just have to buy another.
      That book is the shit.

      Fuck $92 holy crap, where is mine?!

  6. The Ring by khendron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Might not win a competition, but I've always liked this design. Looks way cool when flying.

    The Ring.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:The Ring by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      http://www.instructables.com/id/Annular-Ring-Paper-Plane.

      The key is to throw at just the right speed. Too fast and it cuts corners. Too slow and it will nose dive. Of all the paper airplanes I've thrown, the reward is the best when you get it just right. With a little luck of course.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:The Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also a variation of the ring that has a pointy tail, and flies really far.

    3. Re:The Ring by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Oh man I used to make these all the time in high school.

      Even better is putting about 20-30 staples through the leading edge part to make it fly faster... throw it kind of like a football and you could LAUNCH that sucker.

      Sam

    4. Re:The Ring by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      For many years I made this plane during lectures. The stability of the flight down the lecture theatre was unmatched by any other designs I tried.

    5. Re:The Ring by Polo · · Score: 1

      That's the one I made. No tape and pretty stable.

      I also made this one a lot:
      http://www.paperairplanes.co.uk/trapplan.php

    6. Re:The Ring by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Just built one.... works really really well. Thanks.
      My kids are going to die when they see this thing go.
      Got mine to fly nicely for over 15' until it hit a lamp.

    7. Re:The Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to make one similar to that, but it looked cooler and gave you control surfaces.

      1. Fold along the long diagonal of the paper.
      2. Fold that long edge back maybe 3/4" a couple times
      3. Loop into an oval, with the "wings" at the bottom and jam the one end into the other. Tape if it keeps coming apart

    8. Re:The Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite indeed; another version, perhaps the original that this was copied from, can be made very simply from a beverage can; remove the interior of the top leaving the rim, to move the center of gravity forward as the doubled over portion of the paper version does, then cut the can in half about halfway down, so that it has about the same dimensions as the paper version. Very impressive.

  7. What are you aiming for? by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speed? Distance? Height? The optimal design depends on what you want to achieve.

    1. Re:What are you aiming for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm aiming for some USDA Grade-A va-jay-jay.

  8. Barnaby by pcjunky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember this from an old over 30 years ago.

    http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-the-Barnaby-Paper-Aeroplane/

    1. Re:Barnaby by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      This was always my favourite for time aloft. In a contest in high school I got about 1:9 glide ratio out of this one (if I remember correctly). This is 9 feet forward for one foot of drop, with a very slight push forward. It was either the Barnaby model, or a basic flying wing, which is the Barnaby without the cut-outs ... less stable but more wing surface. These are both amazing outside if you can find a *very* calm hot day.

      I also remember something about Barnaby having the first U.S. pilots licence.

    2. Re:Barnaby by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Thank-you. I had forgotten the name. I used to fold these all the time when I was in jr. high. Mine looked a bit different from the one in the link. The wings had just half an inch folded *up*, not down.

      I would also cut out neat control surfaces or use my nails to warp the paper which I think might have made for less drag.

      When properly adjusted these were amazing. The stiff leading edge also made them robust outdoors. I had a gust of wind catch one and take it half a block into a tree one time, which it managed to fall out of. No telling how far it would have gone without the trees, although to be fair it was down hill. What's more impressive is that this wasn't just a piece of paper blowing in the wind. It maintained a "plane like bearing" in the gust, and glided normally after that. Beautiful moment from childhood you just don't forget.

      Not everybody liked this design. That was probably because you couldn't launch it as fast as dart-based models. It's also harder to make. Precise folding is critical or you'll get something that's permanently warped and can't be tuned. It was better for the "drop from a height and see how far it glides" flight. The throw is also tricky. You need to grab the leading edge in the center and flick your wrist as you release it. Not everybody could get the hang of that.

      Some of the contest winners I've seen have made parabolic arcs. Technicly they win, but it's still just a dart. The Barnaby doesn't take a parabolic trajectory. It glides. It's like a real plane.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Barnaby by arth1 · · Score: 1

      There are many schools of paper airplane making.

      Personally, I would disqualify any plane that needs extra implements to make, whether it be scissors, tape, paper clips, spittle, or otherwise. I'm not a purist, though, and won't scoff at bending wings instead of folding flaps, nor tearing the paper unless it's explicitly stated that the paper must survive intact.

      That said, Europeans have a distinct advantage over Americans in folding paper airplanes, in that the ratio of the paper allows it to maintain the exact same proportion when folded in half.

  9. flying squarish thing by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 2

    I've always liked Ken Blackburn's that set the world record, it's easy to make and the wing actually makes a nice airfoil.

    --
    horror vacui
    1. Re:flying squarish thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this one. It's really easy to make, pretty much always flies, and you can tweak it to make it do whatever you want. If you want air time, it'll get it. If you want it to come back like a boomerang, it'll do that too. I'ts a very fun design that got me through middle school quite nicely :)

    2. Re:flying squarish thing by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Thirding it. The square plane is very tweakable.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  10. Take environment conditions into account by ninjackn · · Score: 5, Funny

    One time at my university the engineering department had this paper airplane competition, everyone was given a sheet of 8.5x11" paper and a paper clip. It was particularly windy that day and the event had been organized for better weather so we ended up having to throw the planes directly into the wind from ground level. The distance of the various planes people built ranged from -10 feet to 20 feet from launch point. Taking this into account I decided to modify my design at the last second. I stepped up to the launch area with my plane, aimed it at a 45 degree angle, crumbled it up into a ball and threw it as hard as I could. I got something like 40 feet and had the furthest distance. I kept saying that it was designed to minimize air resistance but In the end I was disqualified for being a smart ass.

    --
    [FUCK BETA 2.6.2014]
    1. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My school did the same thing at a physics competition. They gave us paperclips duct tape and paper to make a device that would travel the furthest through the air after being launched by hand. They never said "paper airplane" but that's what they had in mind. We put a bunch of paperclips in a paperball and taped it together, and one of the kids on our team was a pitcher for the school's baseball team so he just chucked it down the hallway. It hit the backwall and we won our school an award for it.

    2. Re:Take environment conditions into account by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      Awesome. The award was well deserved.

    3. Re:Take environment conditions into account by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would have appealed their decision. If that's the whole story you were smart, not an ass. I've always judged my planes against the baseline of a crumpled paper ball, and when I've run competitions, we always had an event specifically for crumpled balls. If your event organizers didn't want that design, they should have prohibited it before the event. If that design never occurred to them, then you taught them a valuable engineering lesson.

    4. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Yakasha · · Score: 2

      I would have appealed their decision. If that's the whole story you were smart, not an ass. I've always judged my planes against the baseline of a crumpled paper ball, and when I've run competitions, we always had an event specifically for crumpled balls. If your event organizers didn't want that design, they should have prohibited it before the event. If that design never occurred to them, then you taught them a valuable engineering lesson.

      I'm slowly learning that is why us nerds don't get promoted.

      In the corporate world: The best idea is not always the best idea. Sometimes you have to just shut up and play ball.

    5. Re:Take environment conditions into account by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 2

      I think the most amazing thing about this story is that you were able to throw a crumpled ball of paper 40 feet into a stiff wind. I just went into my front yard with a crumpled ball of paper and could not get more than 33 feet, and that's with no wind at all.

    6. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh man, this was never more true than in my freshman engineering class.

      The challenge was to program a hovercraft to follow a line. Simple problem, but made more difficult by the fact that hovercrafts drift.
      As an easy out, there was a rule that allowed you to drag a weight in order to minimize drift. You still had to have a good line-following algorithm and a fully functioning hovercraft, and the weights could not propel the hovercraft in any way.

      One team chose to drag the front end from a radio controlled car, and wired it to be the steering.

      It was accepted as being within the rules, but not in the "spirit of the competition". I personally thought it was genius and a simple solution to a tough problem within the given constraints, kinda disappointed that I didn't think of it myself. Needless to say, that loophole was corrected the next year. I thought they should have given that team a scholarship.

    7. Re:Take environment conditions into account by nameer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The intent of the organizers is to generate designs with "nice" glide ratios. But to encourage that, the right metric is not distance of flight, but time aloft. A paper airplane that slowly covers 15' is a much "nicer" design then a wadded paper ball that covers 40' in two seconds.

      --
      "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
    8. Re:Take environment conditions into account by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Heh. Reminds me of a early C programming assignment in college (back in the mid 1980s) to read in several variable rows/cols of numbers, sort them, and write out several fixed rows/cols. I wrote a small C program to read and write the numbers and a shell script to pipe the I/O through "sort". Got full credit. (Not thinking like everyone else has helped immensely over the years as a Unix system programmer/admin.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Take environment conditions into account by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      The simple explanation is that you throw like girl. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    10. Re:Take environment conditions into account by traveyes · · Score: 1

      Did the same thing at a company picnic years ago.... My wad of paper went further than any plane and people cried foul. I didn't fight the semantics, didn't really care that I was DQ'd, I knew my "airplane" went further than anyone's and that was good enough.

    11. Re:Take environment conditions into account by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      "Sometimes you have to just shut up and play ball" - I believe that "play ball" is _exactly_ what he did...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    12. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      One time at my university the engineering department had this paper airplane competition, everyone was given a sheet of 8.5x11" paper and a paper clip. It was particularly windy that day and the event had been organized for better weather so we ended up having to throw the planes directly into the wind from ground level. The distance of the various planes people built ranged from -10 feet to 20 feet from launch point. Taking this into account I decided to modify my design at the last second. I stepped up to the launch area with my plane, aimed it at a 45 degree angle, crumbled it up into a ball and threw it as hard as I could. I got something like 40 feet and had the furthest distance. I kept saying that it was designed to minimize air resistance but In the end I was disqualified for being a smart ass.

      You should have pointed out that the ball's rotation produced lift, and thus was a wing by definition; and an airplane since it was flying. My prof once entered a duration contest with a plane made like a helicopter blade - it rotated and slowly feel to the ground. they tried to DQ him when he beat everyone else by several minutes but he correctly pointed out that it was producing lift and thus as much of a plane as any of the other variants.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    13. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I would have appealed their decision. If that's the whole story you were smart, not an ass. I've always judged my planes against the baseline of a crumpled paper ball, and when I've run competitions, we always had an event specifically for crumpled balls. If your event organizers didn't want that design, they should have prohibited it before the event. If that design never occurred to them, then you taught them a valuable engineering lesson.

      I'm slowly learning that is why us nerds don't get promoted.

      In the corporate world: The best idea is not always the best idea. Sometimes you have to just shut up and play ball.

      He did. he lost.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    14. Re:Take environment conditions into account by lipi · · Score: 1

      Back in uni we had an ad-hoc competition, throwing paper airplanes out of a 15th storey window, in calm weather. All sorts of designs were tried, flying time measured. Towards the end it occured to me to compare the times against an etalon: an unfolded A4 sheet. Dropped the sheet from the window, and it started the typical erratic descent of a falling leaf, swinging back-and-forth, pulling straight up at the end of the swings. It took twice as long to touch down than the next best airplane, so it pretty much instantly killed the competition.

    15. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey don't feel bad, a few of my friends and I got suspended from school for a day because we made paper "darts" and stuck them into the ceiling tiles of every class we went to. Eventually, they figured out who had all those classes in common and suspended us for damaging school property. I heard the janitor had quite a time knocking them all out of the ceiling. Disclaimer: these are more ballistic than airplane, but they do hurt quite a bit if you get hit with them. Hence why we called them paper darts.

      1. 8.5 x 11 standard sheet of paper, fold top right corner to the opposite side of the page, 3/4 of the way down the page. Folded part should make a right triangle.

      2. Fold the bottom right edge of the page directly to match the left edge, making a vertical crease down the center of the paper.

      3. Take the new bottom right corner and fold at an angle to match the angle of the crease made in step 1. Should form a smaller right triangle with a small tail out the back.

      4. Take this new triangle, and fold the rest of the page around it tightly, should take 4 folds to completely wrap it up. Crease tightly.

      5. Tuck the small flap of loose paper left into the pocket created by wrapping the paper around itself. Should be left with what looks sort of like a torch.

      6. Tighten all creases as much as possible, (to extend longevity after crashing into things full speed) fold entire assembly lengthwise down the center to form a 90 degree angle.

      7. Throw like a dart, but holding one "wing" instead of both. Don't throw at anything you don't want to pierce.

      Wish I had pictures, but the last time I made one of these, digital cameras hadn't been invented yet, and I would not have any idea where to post one if I did. Like I said though, these are purely ballistic, with no lift and minimal glide, since there is only one wing, really. With enough practice on the release point, and enough arm speed, I've gotten these to "fly" (more like falling in a long parabolic arc) over 30 feet. But at that kind of speed, the tip gets destroyed on impact and it will never fly right again. They're kind of disposable. Much more fun to stick into ceiling tiles. Enjoy.

    16. Re:Take environment conditions into account by Fned · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Take environment conditions into account by sjames · · Score: 2

      Then they should have used glide time as the metric.

      That's the danger of any metric, if it doesn't actually measure what you want, you'll get 'odd' results.

  11. Always liked this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://paplet.blog.cz/0905/dvoumotorak

  12. The definition of 'best'. by apparently · · Score: 0, Troll
    FTFA:

    in this Instructable I will show you how to make a really good paper airplane i have pondered and wondered if this is really the best but i have recently done some tests and my conclusion was that yes this was the best paper airplane. the farthest i have gotten this plane to go is 112 feet!!!

    The farthest point on Earth from me is in the middle of the fucking ocean, and I don't feel the need to exclaim to my wife "Honey! I've discovered the best place on Earth where we can fuck like animals while I teach you the superiority of a properly-configured HOSTS file vs. antimalware software!"

  13. Hypersonic shaped Paper Airplane by Banichi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The very best distance paper airplane I have ever encountered was shown to me by a fellow church-going Virginian when I was about 5 years old.
    You fold the paper into a very narrow dart looking shape, a wingspan of maybe an inch or so at most, a length of almost the entire sheet. Throwing this paper airplane, you can get incredible distances.
    I've never seen anyone else use that design, not that I've looked especially hard.

    1. Re:Hypersonic shaped Paper Airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That design was very popular at sporting events when I was younger. I haven't seen too many paper airplanes these days, because there aren't as many papers/programs being handed out now. The other popular design was the short nose, and max wing surface area(usually built from the center page of a program, so they were often a single sheet approx 17X11). Those, given the right conditions, could be carried aloft and travel for quite some time in the swirling air of some stadiums.

    2. Re:Hypersonic shaped Paper Airplane by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      I invented a design that sounds like yours. Basically I do this design: http://www.10paperairplanes.com/how-to-make-paper-airplanes/03-the-arrow.html and do a third fold before folding the wings. It makes an extremely fast plane with a deadly sharp point. It won't hold up in a pure distance competition unless you can throw it very fast, but it is accurate and has very low drag.

    3. Re:Hypersonic shaped Paper Airplane by Alioth · · Score: 1

      We used to make those all the time at school, except we called them "darts" rather than "planes". The word plane was reserved for something with a bit more reasonable of a wingspan.

  14. Scientific American Published a book on it. by Earl+The+Squirrel · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Great International Paper Airplane Book by Scientific America : http://www.amazon.com/Great-International-Paper-Airplane-Book/dp/0671211293
    had, at least at the time, the "best performing" for time aloft, distance, etc. The designs were very solid.

    1. Re:Scientific American Published a book on it. by rezac · · Score: 1

      The Great International Paper Airplane Book by Scientific America : http://www.amazon.com/Great-International-Paper-Airplane-Book/dp/0671211293
      had, at least at the time, the "best performing" for time aloft, distance, etc. The designs were very solid.

      I had that book as a kid!

      The "Pocket Rocket" (while not a paper airplane) was seriously the most fun a 10 year old could have with a pack of matches, some tin foil and a paper clip. From there I graduated to some seriously large and quite dangerous solid fuel and liquid fuel rockets. None of that Estes rocket stuff, these were home brews, including a full LED indicated launch control board that was capable of 4 separate launches with fail safe and low power ignition check to the filament "fuses."

      Times have changed, I'm sure some of my "creations" would be heavily regulated today.

      --
      -- my sig got /.'d
    2. Re:Scientific American Published a book on it. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I still have my copy, somewhere around here.

    3. Re:Scientific American Published a book on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this book. I got it for Xmas when I was 8, in 1977. For an 8 year old it was the greatest present ever, I have made all the planes in it many many times over. I'm pretty sure I still have it in a box somewhere.

  15. world record... by mortonda · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:world record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Video of the John Collins, the inventor/creator of that design folding the plane: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VG-4BSZcwI
      Unlisted video, don't know why.

      I've just tried it, and even without the tape, it flies much better than the Harrier

    2. Re:world record... by curunir · · Score: 2

      This article has a brief discussion of the overall design of the plane. Not really a step-by-step how-to, but there's enough in there for someone with some physics knowledge and Googling skills to create something similar.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    3. Re:world record... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlisted video, don't know why.

      The "origamikids" who put up the video don't have rights to the video. See the comments.

  16. Super-basic square by mcrbids · · Score: 2

    I grew up having to go to church. And every week, I would wait so impatiently for the 20 minutes or so at the end of service when all of us kids would get the run of the main hall and run around in circles and burn off all the energy we'd saved up sitting still!

    We had a perpetual paper airplane contest, because every week there were program sheets passed out that nobody cared about after the service. So I spent years competing for the best flying airplane, at least among other children under 12 or so.

    The very best design I ever concocted was a "square plane" design, something like this one, except that instead of folding it down the middle, I bent it up about 1" along either side, making it into a low, squared off "U" shape when viewed from the front. Experiment with different sizes of roll, different lengths of roll until you get it right. (I didn't get much result making the fins down either side much smaller or bigger, 1" is about perfect) I usually got best results with the plane being 6" wide and 6" long - nearly perfect square, with about 5 inches of paper rolled up at the front.

    Launch by pulling it into the air straight up, over your head, with your fingers under the front rolled-over part, it will gently fly with the fins up ("upside down") and glide a long way, dancing along the edge of stall. If you are looking for excellent hang times (not speed) this is the plane you want. 30 seconds or more of airtime are commonplace.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  17. Magic trick by eulernet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just use a sheet, draw a treasure map on it, and let it fly.

    In a lot of movies, a simple sheet of paper is able to fly long distances, even when there is no wind, as long as it contains something important for the hero.

  18. Criteria? by Killer+Panda · · Score: 1

    As always, it depends on your goals. The Harrier (or Nakamura) is indeed an excellent plane if you're looking for aerobatic performance. A slight adjustment of the ailerons (and much practice) can have it doing barrel rolls, loops, or any combination of tricks. It is one of my favorite. For flight duration and gliding, I prefer a flying wing design similar to the Surfer with different winglet folds based on flight conditions. And for distance, the old missile or dart style airplane (probably the first paper airplane you ever learned how to fold) generally performs best. Get those folds nice and tight and throw as hard as you can at 45 degrees and then go chase it down.

  19. Personal experience by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    My fav came from the Great International Paper Airplane Book. Sort of square design with upturned wing tips. The initial shape reminded me of a diaper. But here's the kicker: I tossed one of these off the Eiffel Tower and filmed it. It flew for 7.5 minutes and landed on the other side of the Seine. Good times.

    1. Re:Personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tossed one of these off the Eiffel Tower and filmed it. It flew for 7.5 minutes and landed on the other side of the Seine.

      Link or it didn't happen.

      PS: Haha, captcha is "unproven". Are they somehow not picked randomly?

    2. Re:Personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope so :( (captcha: "coskcuscker")

  20. I concur with the article's writer. by mark-t · · Score: 2

    For aiming, it's only slightly worse than the dart style of paper plane, but this one has *WAY* more lift....when made correctly, a gentle toss can send it gliding almost perfectly straight for dozens of yards.

  21. "The Harrier"? by LanceUppercut · · Score: 2

    "The Harrier"? Where did that come from? This plane is known as Nakamura lock, although this design is normally recognized as the "defualt" paper airplane design. It doesn't really need a name. When someone simply says "a paper airplane" without providing any specifics, it is universally assumed that Nakamura lock is implied.

    1. Re:"The Harrier"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not in the UK. I was first shown this design by an American kid at my school and I've always wondered what it was called and where it came from.

  22. ball by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    Best is very subjective. I'd wager that if you could compress the sheet of paper down into an ultra-dense ball maybe the size of a slingshot ball, it could be launched much farther than any airplane-shaped piece of paper. Is a ball still an airplane? Is "best" defined by the maximum distance it can travel? Obviously the ball is not best if "best" requires it to look like our primitive airplanes...

    1. Re:ball by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      Are you really puzzled by the question of whether a ball is an airplane? The terms "lift" and "ballistic trajectory" haven't crossed your mind?

  23. All my best ones.... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    ....start off quite elaborate then end up as a scrunched ball of paper.

    Another case where NOTHING beats rock.

  24. The Box. by Balinares · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back when I was still at school, one year, my classroom was one overlooking a deep vale. One of our primary pastimes that year was chucking assorted stuff out the window and see how it'd fly. Mostly (but not limited to) paper planes.

    The record winner for that year in terms of distance covered, and by far, was also the simplest model we ever came up with.

    It was much like the Ring mentioned above, except even simpler. Where the Ring's profile makes an O, the Box's makes a square U. So you don't even need tape.

    Just take a rectangular piece of paper, fold the front over several times to make a thicker leading edge, and fold two vertical wings so the thing will look somewhat like an elongated cube with three missing sides. That's it. Not only it flies, but it flies pretty well, so long as you balanced the 'wings' well enough.

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
  25. Glider with a waterbomb fold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We used to hold paper airplane competitions back in grade school, I won a few using this plane, which I got from some 'paper airplane creator' software. Works really good outside & the flaps can make it do decent rolls and stuff.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8KahWm-jSM&feature=related

    It's always been my favorite.

  26. Re:FIRST by GeorgeMonroy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recommend the learn the grammar.

    --
    You got the touch!
  27. The Ultimate Paper Airplane by TexVex · · Score: 1

    I once owned a copy of a large paperback titled "The Ultimate Paper Airplane". It was actually a very interesting read. Between templates for paper airplanes, it told the tale of the Kline-Fogleman Airfoil. Basically, if you cut out a wedge from a wing or propeller, the airfoil becomes significantly more efficient. The book went into the physics of it.

    Anyway, I don't know if that paper airplane is what you're looking for. But, wouldn't you know it, YouTube has a video of one being made and flown.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    1. Re:The Ultimate Paper Airplane by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? KF airfoils are not efficient.

    2. Re:The Ultimate Paper Airplane by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      I've been making a paper airplane with the flap lock such as in that video and the article since about the mid-1970s, although I generally do the wings differently. Most of the time, I'll fold the wings first as the article describes -- the outer edge of the wings folded down to line up with the bottom of the spine -- and then similarly to how the video shows -- from the point on the nose where the first fold starts down just above where the triangle of the folded tip ends -- which, when unfolded, gives me a gull-wing effect deepening toward the rear of the plane. Less often, I will do the first fold in the reverse direction, so that what I get is an inverted gull-wing. Because the keel doesn't stick down as far, the inverted gull-wing version has a little less drag and flies slightly faster, but it's more readily diverted by gusts of wind when flown outside. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing; when I was in high school I lost one of them when it disappeared from sight over an auditorium after some 35 seconds of flight.

  28. It is a great design by javascriptjunkie · · Score: 1

    Most of mine are usually all variations on that one, give or take the angle and number of folds in the wings. The conventional paper airplane, the classic is pretty good too, if you fold larger section of the tip down, which gives it a little more weight on the front end. It'll make it fly longer, if you adjust the angle of the wings from quarter to half. That's my two cents. Hope that helps.

  29. A nod to El Reg by seandiggity · · Score: 1
    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  30. Paperpang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may want to try this : http://www.paperang.com/aero.htm
    Unfortunately, it looks like the whole building instructions are not free.

  31. Two rings by sleepypsycho · · Score: 1

    I found the two ring model works great. http://www.kids-fun-science.com/cool-science-experiments.html Instead of a straw you can just roll up the remainder of the peice of paper. It glides amazingly flat and even. I remember reading that it had one some distance contests when launched from a platform but I could not find a reference on line.

  32. '72 Tonybony Special by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    I was shown how to fold the "Harrier" in 1972 by a kid at my school called Tony. he called it the "Tonybony Special" and so I do to this day. It's my standard 'plane. Once I flew one from a third storey window on a hot summer's day and it caught a thermal and was still in the air over half an hour later, just lazily circling. I have no idea how long it stayed up altogether.

    The only bad thing about the design is that, like most paper planes, it doesn't scale up all that well. Folding an A1 sheet to the same design doesn't work, sadly.

  33. Re:Erratic Flight by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    I'll reply to you because you're high up enough to be noticed.

    Absolutely no one in the thread has noted my favorite design. Sorry, no pics. This is a stunt design, not about distance.

    1. Typical 8x11, vertical/portrait
    2. Bottom left corner to 3/4 right side.
    3. Bottom right corner to match = "Inverted house". Crease hard. (I flip 180 degrees here for ease on next step.)
    4. Buckle the two sides in so that you get another "house" but this time with two extra flaps.
            Protip: Slight variations in this step lead to different tricks.
    5. Fold Nose Half to 2/3 of the way to the base of the "triangle". (Created by the cross folds.)
    6. Fold directly in half along the base to connect both wings.
    7. Fold each wing down making a fuselage
    8. Fold wingtips up or down as desired.

    It's a slow heavy design but it can do about 4 tricks depending on mods:
    Yoyo Loops (Right back to your feet), Circle Patrols, Short-Direct flights 15 feet away, or "Ditzy" where it completely loses its balance and goes haywire.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  34. Re:FIRST by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    please, stop. As a real an interested reader of slashdot, I am ungodly sick of fools like you presuming the reason errors exist in posts is lack of education; it's really lack of interest in making you happy that let's me be happy sayin' its, it's, it is, or freakin' "itis" for crap sake, whenever I want to. If you are really so retentive you can't deal with interpreting what people type into your own chosen dialect, then it's YOUR problem, not ours.

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  35. It's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Engineers can suck the fun out of anything. I say this as an engineer, of course...

  36. Nakamura Lock by Lucidus · · Score: 2

    This design appears to be identical to one I learned to make from a Klutz Press book. It is called the Nakamura Lock, after its designer, and it is definitely the best paper airplane I have flown indoors. It seems kind of tacky to rename it - the designer should get some credit for his work.

  37. Distance! by jefurii · · Score: 1

    I almost won a distance competition in Boy's Brigade in elementary school with this design. It was just a piece of paper crumpled up as tight as I could squeeze it (I think I stepped on it a couple times too) and thrown as hard as possible. The guy who came in second of course argued that it wasn't an airplane. I got some kind of award, though it might have been some kind of "outside the box" award.

    1. Re:Distance! by cynyr · · Score: 1

      I had to do one like that as well, 2 sheets of paper, a straw, all the tape you wanted, but it had to use the straw, and had to have two "1 inch wide rings" connected by the straw.

      I made an arrow cut two rings out of the long side of the second sheet, and then folded the rest up into a tight ball. Wrapped the ball in most of a roll of tape. Tapped the straw down the center of the plane, taped the ball to the front, and threw it like a nerf foot ball. went far and straight. same as you, got "the outside the box" award, despite winning.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    2. Re:Distance! by Intropy · · Score: 1

      I like a variant of the arrow wit a flat front. In the steps from your link, between steps 2 and 3 fold the front point back to the point where the two triangular flaps meet the proceed as normal. It's really straightforward to make, but works much better than the normal dart for me.

  38. Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... on what you are looking for your plane to do. Distance? Speed? Accuracy? Stunts?

    I don't know of a single plane that does all of the above. The Harrier design has pretty good distance and accuracy, but isn't very fast and doesn't do a whole lot of stunts.

    Dart designs have high speed and the best accuracy, but don't often to go nearly as far as a plane that has better glide/lift.

    Broad-winged planes like several mentioned here usually have crap for distance, speed, and accuracy, but can be made to do some interesting stunts depending on how you shape flaps into their trailing wing edges.

     

  39. Longest flying plane by Stargoat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was a kid, we had a longest flying plane contest. The rules were the plane had to be moving, and out of your hands. I attached a piece of string to it, and whipped it around for four minutes. The buggers DQed me, stating that I should follow the spirit of the rules.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  40. Ask the 2012 World Record Holder by YellowTop · · Score: 1

    This guy set the world distance record recently. He has a lot of paper airplane designs on his web site.
    http://thepaperairplaneguy.com/

    A video of some of his different designs.
    http://www.dump.com/paperairplane/

    - YT

  41. The stingray glider by azbot · · Score: 1

    I have had pretty good success (and some random failures) with this design. Alas I can not find a reference to it online, and more than likely the name I have for it is incorrect. I found the design when I was a younger child, the design was in a book of paper plane designs.

    The design is fairly simple though:

    1. Start folding a traditional paper plane: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_plane using the example image on the wikipedia page, before performing the middle/centre step in the image, insert an additional step.
    2. The additional step is:Fold the tip down so that it touches the tail of the plane at the centre line, then fold it back up again so that an additional crease is made about 2cm from the one made just before.
    3. Continue with the instructions on the wikipedia page.

    The result will be a traditional dart with a tiered nose, which will fly a bit more stabler than a traditional dart. You may need to gently tweak the trailing edge of the wings to create a bit more upward direction (lift is probably the wrong word). You can also play with the positioning of the creases made in the additional step to adjust the balance, which will probably achieve the same results as the wing tweaking.

    The following SVG should give you a hint: http://pastebin.com/PnsaGPzK

  42. Re:FIRST by mug+funky · · Score: 1

    I recommend the read the GP post.

  43. My favorite design (with complete instructions) by DaneM · · Score: 1

    I went looking on the 'Net for a link to my favorite paper airplane design, so that I could post it here. To my mild surprise, I couldn't find one. Since this is a rather unusual paper airplane that I learned to make at my local elementary school (about 20 years ago--does that make me old?), I decided that I should preserve it in a blog post for posterity.

    Below is a link to the post, with pictures of the various steps, as well as the finished product. It should be noted that this planes is not good for distance, but rather for really neat flying patterns. I hope you enjoy it.

    http://danemutters.wordpress.com/2012/04/11/cool-paper-airplane-design/

    1. Re:My favorite design (with complete instructions) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a good plane. The folds were just tricky enough to bamboozle anyone trying to copy it. I was making that exact plane during the late 80s/early 90s in an Australian high school, so it's not localised. No idea what it was called though.

    2. Re:My favorite design (with complete instructions) by Shag · · Score: 1

      I made a lot of ones using this overall design as a kid, with different wing-edge treatments. Did all kinds of variations on it, too.

      I wasn't going for distance or flight-time records - just wanted something that flew decently, had some control surfaces I could tweak, and looked neat.

      Twenty-odd years ago I wound up with a design that met those criteria to my satisfaction. I've rarely made anything else since then - and I've never seen anyone else make my design. I'll have to put together instructions sometime.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  44. The double ring by Thomasje · · Score: 1

    This (second from right) is my favorite. You do need glue or tape to make it, which may disqualify it from the record books, depending on how purist your rules are.
    The one in the photo has a straw for a fuselage, but you can make it from paper by folding a long strip of paper into a three-sided prism and taping or gluing it shut. The two ring-shaped wings should be slightly different diameters, and the plane should be launched small ring forward. It is amazingly stable and I could throw it farther than any competing plane in my class. I'm not sure if it would travel the full length of my elementary-school gym, but it wouldn't surprise me if it did.

  45. The Reefer Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in HS, my math teacher held a day long paper airplace event. During the period my class was there some guy came up with a bit of reefer paper ( about 1/8"x1/8" ) on his finger tip. Guy called it "The Reefer Express". He blew on it and it floated up into the air got caught in the wind. We were using the football stadium , it floated across the stadium and we never did see it come down. Won the competition hands down.

  46. Best Paper Airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Paper Airplane usually flies some variant of the Klein-Fogelman Airfoil. Lookup the "Ultimate Paper Airplane" in amazon. They teach an interesting design, but your Harrier will usually perform better than their designs if you're having kids fold it. Try folding a flatter, wider version, with the wing folds being just across the top of the hold-down fold that your harrier instructions call the "cockpit" - the part shaded red. If you want slower flight, you can cut a "tail" across the keel fold and up to the wing folds. It will act as an elevator.

    If you're playing as an adult...

    Buy the Ultimate Paper Airplane which discusses KF airfoils and plan on buying the special paper. Heavier paper and crisp folds will easily break the 175 foot mark.

    If you want more speed and sharper wind performance, try making planes out of business card stock or card stock. Many times a soda straw can substitute for a keel fold. Hold the control surfaces onto the straw using scotch tape. Adjust CG using a paper clip or fifteen - you will end up with what looks like a ghetto "White Wings", that doesn't take five hours of gluing.

    For good times with fast construction - try cutting airplanes out of McDonald's Big Breakfast containers and use pennies and for CG. The lightweight foam is reasonably crash proof, and flies very straight. Control surfaces and rudders can be made by just cutting a slit and inserting a leftover piece.

    FYI, one of the longest paper airplane flights from the 80's - time wise - was made by a "plane" that spun over and over again along its axis. The plane only had to fall for 5 feet to make over a minute in the air.

    Hope you find your inner child.

  47. These paper planes can stay up indefinately! by danceswithtrees · · Score: 1

    In a slightly different vein, but still made of paper, these "walkalong" gliders can stay up a long time. Longer than any conventional paper airplane thrown from the ground. See the video:
    http://www.instructables.com/id/Indoor-Paper-Airplane-Walkalong-Glider/

  48. Pope hat/"tube" paper airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found this same plane in a paper airplane book when I was a kid back in the 80s. This will compete with anything as far as gliding distance when dropped from a decent height: http://thesassyhomemaker.com/2010/02/17/how-to-make-a-paper-airplane-that-actually-flies

    It also has the advantage of being incredibly easy to make and remember how to make after one time. And makes a great Cat in the Pope Hat costume for your feline.

  49. Sky King by spandex_panda · · Score: 1

    I spent a few years of my youth testing planes and came up with two which are the best.

    First, you have a dart, a more basic variation of that one you pointed out. It is the one where you make two folds and then fold over. Very simple and quick to make, and very fast and stable. (this design, but I fold right to the point: http://www.amazingpaperairplanes.com/Basic_Dart.html).

    Then there was the stunt plane, which I found was recently the world record plane. This guys plane is a better version of the one I made. Mine was the same shape and weighting, but with different folds so the front wasn't held together. Anyhow, the following plane is IMHO the best in the world: http://howto.wired.com/wiki/Fold_Your_Own_Sky_King_Paper_Airplane

    --
    like phosphorescent desert buttons singing one familiar song
  50. Sharp-nosed Harrier :-) by Inyu · · Score: 1

    I didn't like the blunt nose of the original "Harrier", so I designed "Sharp-nosed paper airplane", here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_8EbzUyBqY -- try it out.

  51. Not folding arms on floor by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Not folding arms on floor.

    http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%85%92%E7%B2%BE%E4%B8%AD%E6%AF%92

    Big white F35-phone over.

    Rice paper higher fly.

  52. The one my dad built for me in the 1970's by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    Plans for this acrobatic plane were published in a 4-volume 1940's British encyclopedia called 'World of the Children'. (I have a copy on my shelf.) The instructions call it a glider, and explain how to gently release it by the tail so it proceeds across the room in a leisurely fashion. At six, I discovered I could hold the thing nose-first with my three middle fingers and whip it high into the sky.

    It might not be a world-beater, but it's fun to fly.

  53. accordion glider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best paper plane I ever made was a modification of a simple glider with a heavy nose. I can't easily post instructions here, but I folded the wings back and forth such that the plane took an appearance of wvw from the front. It does not glide, but instead it throws like a bullet and goes perfectly straight. With a strong enough throw, it can out distance many other planes.

  54. Define "best* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If best = flies the furthest in a straight line from the person throwing it then no, the harrier is not the best.
    If best = most fun to tweak then no, the harrier is not the best.

  55. I'll just leave this here... by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    http://hairball.mine.nu/~rwa2/aircraft/

    "The arrow" for straight-line distance.

    "The flying wing" for glide slope.

    "The super guppy" for cargo capacity (usually water).

    "The basic glider" is good for loops and stunts.

    "The slant-nose glider" for wet terrain (it has landing gear that help keep the wings dry).

  56. Re:FIRST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoosh.

  57. A complicated but impressive one by Waldeinburg · · Score: 1

    This one (from the Danish television show So Ein Ding) looks a bit complicated to build, but the flying is quite impressive: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPtXaSlEYgw

  58. geek approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geek approach to the problem would be to work out the center of gravity and pressure for different designs, take some areodynamics into account and select the best possible design like that

  59. MTA Boomerang? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If time aloft if the metric, then I think the an MTA origami boomerang might fit the bill. The competition record for an MTA is something like 6-7 minutes, and can achieve 15 minutes in casual throwing. That's wood, much heavier then a paper one would be. The trick would be to make one side 2-3 times longer then the other
    side. The principle is the same as a maple seed which comes helicoptering through the air, except it's also a boomerang.

  60. Re:FIRST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "then it's YOUR problem, not ours."

    Idiots like you drag the world down by your very existence.

    Do the world a favor and commit suicide.

    Yes, it is OUR problem. You, and your ilk are giving the rest of us a bad name, ruining our reputation as mammals.

  61. Re:FIRST by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    What an inept piece of trolling that was.

    "i recommend the grow the fuck up"?

    Well I recommend the learn the spell!

    The sort of retard who trolls for frosty piss is lucky to be readable, never mind grammatically correct.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  62. Long distance by Ziraku · · Score: 1

    I've always had luck with this one.

  63. klinefogleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    klinefogleman imo is the best since it's design prevents stalling

  64. modified eastern star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you rub a spoon round side up under the wings you create static air pockets which kill friction and a paer clip at fron and you can get great distances

  65. Re:Erratic Flight by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

    Not getting what you mean by Step 4. I am stuck without brain visualization.

  66. Improve The Harrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found it usually has a tendancy to go up, down or veer since folding is never exact so I cut ailerons into the back of the wings and bend them to correct.

  67. Not really a dupe... by jbwolfe · · Score: 1
    --
    Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
  68. They ignore the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHAT SIZE PAPER DO YOU USE?

    By that I don't mean overall square footage, but length/width ratio.

    There is a big difference between using a legal sized piece of paper and a normal sized sized and a square piece of paper.

    Most likely a longer one does better - but I have never seen any real info on which ratio of length to width is the best.

  69. YMMV by way2slo · · Score: 1

    The "Best" is going to greatly depend on lots of things including, but not limited to, how well you folded it, throw it, paper type, relative humidity, altitude, etc.

    That said, I ran across this a few years ago:
    http://www.instructables.com/id/KlineFogleman-Airfoil-1-Paper-Airplane/
    It requires very accurate folding, but if done right with the right kind of paper and flown in good conditions it can be impressive. The airfoil turns some of the drag into lift and stability. The two guys that patented the airfoil wrote a book about it some years ago.

    Also, there is a difference between making a plane for record distance and making a plane for record time aloft. The former needs minimal drag while the latter needs maximum lift.

  70. wing-with-grip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite is the wing-with-grip: http://burtleburtle.net/bob/other/airplane.html

    It has a tendency to spiral, but when it goes straight it goes a long ways, and it does great acrobatics in a large room or outdoors after a hard toss.

  71. The classic Dart.... by jzarling · · Score: 1

    The classic Dart has always my mainstay when making planes for my son and his friends.

    I am also partial to the designs in this book : http://www.amazon.com/The-Ultimate-Paper-Airplane-Step/dp/0671555510
    ISBN-10: 0671555510
    ISBN-13: 978-0671555511

    I have a variation of the general "Ultimate" designs, and the "Harrier" that resembles a Shuttle - These used to be mandatory for my then 3yro (now 6) when we watched shuttle liftoffs, and landings.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  72. Walkalong glider! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised no one has posted this yet:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walkalong_glider

  73. Re:Step 4 by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Hi there!

    After the first steps that bring the corners to the opposite sides, and crease, and flip, when you uncrease the paper you have two diagonal creases suggesting a square bounded on 3 sides by the paper and the 4th by an un-drawn line where the diagonal creases hits the paper edges. (There's a little bit of paper "unassigned" because those diagonal folds essentially mark off a square, and of course 8x11 paper is rectangular.)

    So with your paper at portrait orientation with a big X crease in it, fold the top edge horozontally down *behind and away* from you to form a horozontal crese in the middle of the X crease, and try not to physically re-orient the paper. (Then unfold- it was just a crease)

    Then when you unfold it, if I explained this right, the concept will explode into your mind with one more sentence. Very slowly, for didactic effect,

    push the sides of the horozontal crease *inward to touch each other and down along the diagonals so both lay flat on the base of the paper*.

    That's the reason I had you do the horozontal crease back and away, because it makes the paper almost want to go right where you need it. Then jut flatten the top down which (hopefully) should be obvious by now because there's nowhere else for it to go.

    Does that help?

    Later on if you get bored and want to kill an hour, that "flap creator" is a lynchpin of oragami, so you can make yourself 10 big square sheets of paper and fiddle with it.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  74. Re:Erratic Flight by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

    Pretty much this. http://www.instructables.com/id/Awesome-paper-plane!!/

    5th picture in step 1.

  75. Paper Planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the world record holders was made by Ken Blackburn. Here is the design:
    http://www.10paperairplanes.com/how-to-make-paper-airplanes/08-the-champ.html

    For those that remember Glider (video), the old paper airplane game for Mac, the author offers the OS X version for free here:
    http://homepage.mac.com/calhoun/Glider%20PRO.html

  76. Paperang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one that should definitely be in the running: http://www.paperang.com/download.htm

    Fairly simple, but VERY affective

  77. most useless contest ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lunar Surface Paper Airplane Time and Distance Contest