Congress' Gulf Oil Spill Response Given a 'D' By Commissioners
ananyo writes "Many of the problems that led to the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill have not been addressed, say the members of a commission set up by U.S. President Barack Obama to study the disaster. The group released a report today (PDF) on progress towards its 2011 recommendations for preventing future disasters and improving spill response. The U.S. Congress fares worst in the new report, earning a 'D' rating for its failure to enact any meaningful legislation in response to the disaster. The Restore Act would allocate 80% of any fines that BP pays for the spill under the Clean Water Act to restoring the environment and economies of the states in the Gulf of Mexico, but the act has stalled in the House of Representatives. The Obama administration did better, with a B, thanks in part to new drilling regulations, while the oil industry's efforts to improve safety saw it awarded a C+."
They scored an "A" on fund-raising from oil companies.
What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
Obama's administration gave itself a 'B' . . . dude needs to learn how "patting yourself on the back" is supposed to work.
The administration ought to get an 'F', given that they've approved Shell to drill in the Arctic Ocean. You think it's tough to clean up a spill in the nice temperate Gulf of Mexico? Wait until we have a midwinter blowout up there, with no idea how to clean it up or even stop it.
You'd think they'd at least learn something. Apparently not.
To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
... for doing nothing. This was, as I understand it, more a problem of lax regulation than lack of regulation.
I don't like the "but we must do SOMEthing" philosophy. Most problems are caused by solutions.
In other news, the commissioners were given an 'A+' on their use of overly simplified letter grades for summarizing complex issues.
what bp did was already illegal.
there's a problem with how the court/justice is implemented when they're not doing time for it..
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
So you mean private individuals whose position comes on them creating some reason to justify their employment?
How exactly is the problem with government as a whole, as opposed to the privatization of government into the hands of those who benefit not by doing their job properly, but who have corrupted the process for their own benefit?
What does that tell you? Which party is the one who continually claims that outside individuals are somehow going to be better? Whose ideology is that?
I dunno... maybe these people:
http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/page/commission-members
are all supporters of Obama... but after reading their bios, I find no reason to believe they're more or less supportive of Obama than your average businessmen or scientists, other than they were selected while Obama was in office. If fact, there's 2 co-chairmen; one's a democrat and the other's a republican. All members seem to be experts in their various fields, specifically marine ecosystems, engineering and oil extraction/spill cleanup (a couple of Exxon Valdez veterans on that list; sounds very useful and logical to me).
Briefly perusing the meeting minutes, it seems they've been up to a lot more than grading Congress and Obama's administration, anyway. If you have a problem with what they're doing, this site's where to go to learn more, and it's surprisingly full of info.