Slashdot Mirror


Google Shutting Out Rivals, Claims Russian Search Engine Yandex

suraj.sun writes "Ilya Segalovich, co-founder of Russia's leading search engine, Yandex, has accused Google of abusing its dominance to shut out competitors in cyberspace. Responding to comments made to the Guardian by Sergey Brin, the Google co-founder, about threats to the open internet, Ilya Segalovich described the U.S. search giant's popular smartphone platform, Android, as a 'strange combination of openness and not openness,' and its Chrome web browser as anti-competitive. Segalovich said that Brin should explain Google's 'semi-open' approach to search competitors before accusing others of endangering the unfettered internet, and suggested Google was guilty of foul play with its Chrome browser, which picks the company's own search engine as default for users, rather than offering a choice between rivals including Yahoo, Bing and Yandex."

170 comments

  1. Well yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well yea. People only seem to speak up about this when it threaten their money.
    Doesn't matter when it threaten privacy, freedom, etc.

  2. Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's odd. On my machine I can open Chrome, go to Settings|Basics|Search and select from several search engines including Bing and Chrome will honor my selection. If the one you like isn't listed, you can add it yourself. Sure it starts out set to Google by default, it kind of has to be set to something, but that's hardly "shutting out the competition".

    1. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still looks like the exact same thing as having internet explorer as default installed in windows. just one level deeper. Microsoft had to change it. so why not google?

    2. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Because IE was bundled with MS, thus you effectively had to pay for it whether you used it or not. Google, however, can be used from any other browser without cost.

    3. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because your machine does not come with Google Chrome. You had to go fetch it.
      And when you install it for the first time it ASKS you which search engine you want.

      From then on it shows what ever you selected, and the list of choices is wider than any other browser.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Yea sounds like recent claims by some other smaller browser makers made against IE.

      MS had to add a selection of browser in their EU release of Windows I think, and they included the bigger named ones; IE, Chrome, FF, Safari, Opera, etc... But then a buncha smaller ones got made because they were also not included.

    5. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Sancho · · Score: 2

      The bundling problem always had to do with Microsoft using a monopoly in one market (OS) to gain significant market share in another market (web browsers.) It had nothing to do with having to pay for unwanted bundles (at least in the US.) Otherwise, Microsoft might have needed to unbundle things like Notepad, Wordpad, Paint, etc. I sure know that I never would have wanted those, preferring WinVi and a real painting tool.

    6. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 1

      Yea sounds like recent claims by some other smaller browser makers made against IE.

      Here's where you seem confused. They made claims against Microsoft, not IE. Microsoft has dominance in the desktop OS market and used that to promote IE instead of letting it live or die based upon it's own merits in a competitive marketplace. Google may be guilty of similar leveraging of their dominance in online search and search related advertisement, but not in bundling things into their browser (which has relatively small market share). Google can bundle anything they want with Chrome. It's when they bundle things with Google search (you get them when you get search) that you run afoul antitrust law. When Google starts promoting their other services unfairly in search results (as they've done and been busted for) that's when Google is doing the same antitrust behavior as MS.

    7. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look the problem was not only that IE was included in Windows. One you could not remove IE. Two, IE had access to the underlying OS that was on purpose not allowed to be used in Netscape, thus, slowed it down on purpose. Three, Microsoft used its position with vendors to ensure that Netscape could never strike a deal with hardware vendors to include Netscape. Dell, HP, Gateway, IBM, and so on were all told that including Navigator would increase the license cost per machine. Finally, Microsoft used its partnership with Intel to ensure that Netscape couldn't band with someone else and make enough money to offset any kind of increase in license cost. If Netscape tried to get with IBM to make Netscape on the Cyrix processor. Intel could revoke the right for IBM to use the x86 instruction set.

      It was a systematic and well planned move to ensure that no matter how much money Netscape could pull together, Netscape was never to be put on a PC and any attempt to do so, should make said PC pay dearly. That's why their butts got hauled to court.

    8. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Personally, I could never understand why Microsoft got into trouble with IE. After all, you could always change browsers if you wanted to...like most of us did. To my mind, having something as a default as long as there was an easy way to override it should not be reasons for antitrust.

      Now if Windows had disallowed or otherwise hindered users from installing another browser, THAT would be a different matter altogether!

    9. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The bundling problem always had to do with Microsoft using a monopoly in one market (OS) to gain significant market share in another market (web browsers.) It had nothing to do with having to pay for unwanted bundles (at least in the US.) Otherwise, Microsoft might have needed to unbundle things like Notepad, Wordpad, Paint, etc. I sure know that I never would have wanted those, preferring WinVi and a real painting tool.

      So Google has turned Microsoft's game on it's head, they have gained a significant share in one market (Web Browsers) to sustain what is practically a monopoly in another (Internet Search). When I installed Chrome it did not pop up a window and offer me a choice of which search engine to use. How many people bother to click their way into the settings menu and pick a search engine other than Google whey they set up Chrome? I'd be surprised if they more than a small percentage. Chrome provides Google with a very powerful tool for gathering data on the browsing habits of millions of people that is rivaled only by those omnipresent Facebook buttons.

      Posting anonymously to avoid being modded down by legions of Googlebots furiously lecturing me on how none of this is really anything to worry about because Google isn't evil and would never ever abuse it's position unlike Microsoft which is the spawn of Satan.

    10. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Well I had mod points (until I commented here) and would have voted up because its a sensible statement of a possible anti-trust action.

      Microsoft may be the spawn of Satan, but there is no reason why Google cannot be persuaded to sell its soul and join the Dark Side.... :-)

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    11. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Chrome is getting to a stage where its share of the market could be regarded as significant.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    12. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 1

      Personally, I could never understand why Microsoft got into trouble with IE.

      Read an economics textbook. Antitrust and bundling are pretty common terms. Anything written in the last century should cover it.

    13. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > or otherwise hindered users from installing another browser

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall IE being so deeply "integrated" with Windows that using other browsers would be much slower. Also, don't forget about ActiveX and IE-only webpages. And NTLM-encrypted intranets, and windows-1252, which are still worth mentioning although they aren't issues anymore.

    14. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting.
      I don't own an Android, or use Google OS, but are you saying that they don't come with chrome?

    15. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think it might not in Russia (some AC below posted a link to a bug report that said they disabled the first-run search selector screen for Russian builds). However, it should be noted this is not a monopolistic practice. Yandex has 62% share in Russia, while Google only has a 25% share, so they can't really be "shutting out" Yandex: Yandex is by far the biggest player already. You can argue about what Google should do, but not offering a selection screen is hardly illegal, because Google isn't even close to the majority player.

      Also, Segalovich claims that "If you download an application [on Android] it does not work if it's not Android marketplace." Which is wrong, at face value (I've sideloaded apps all the time), so either a) this is just FUD or b) he isn't conveying his point very well (actually, b is certain, I read what he is claiming and I still don't know what he is trying to say).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    16. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if Windows had disallowed or otherwise hindered users from installing another browser, THAT would be a different matter altogether!

      It did. At one point it was "impossible" to separtate IE from Windows. Certain functionality required IE. Microsoft was pushing to make websites that were IE only. Read some history before commenting again.

    17. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The story he was referring to was not about the ability to change the search engine in general, but rather about the dialog that pops up when you first run Chrome on a given machine and asks you to select the initial default search engine (kinda like that browser ballot box that Microsoft had to add in Windows to satisfy EU).

      Which is a nice thing - though not legally mandated in any way (but I bet it was a pre-emptive move by Google's legal department). Except that they then specifically disabled it if current locale is Russian. Legal, of course, but kinda sleazy to do this kind of market differentiation.

      All that said, the code seems to no longer be present in Chromium trunk.

    18. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      When I installed Chrome it did not pop up a window and offer me a choice of which search engine to use. How many people bother to click their way into the settings menu and pick a search engine other than Google whey they set up Chrome?

      Conversely, how many people install Chrome and reasonably expect some other search engine to be the default? I mean, If you're downloading the Google Chrome web browser, it would seem kinda obvious to me that the default search engine would be Google.

      The real question is; how many people would bother to change it even if it was a big pop-up window when you first ran the browser? I literally do not know anybody that does not solely use Google as their search engine. Of course that's not to say that those people don't exist, obviously, but I'd really doubt it's a sizable percentage based on my own personal observations. I mean, not sure if this is still true, but Bing was using Google's search results. Why fuck around with a middle-man?

      I'm no Googlebot, and I understand the privacy concerns that stem from the fact that they've got their fingers in literally every damn pie out there, but I think that there are some silly scenarios that come out of these complaints. Like the arguments against Google just returning the answer to a query at the top of a search rather than serving up a bunch of websites related to it if it can do so. Most people, when they search a question, are looking for a fucking answer, not 1,000 websites talking about the answer. If I type in "How tall is Tom Cruise?", I'm not wondering how tall IMDB specifically thinks he is, or Wikipedia, I just want to know how freaking tall he is...but there are people arguing that is an abuse of their position and should deliberately obfuscate the information to drive hits to competitor sites? Come on. Not saying this particular AC is saying that (before someone starts screaming Straw Man) just saying I've heard that argument before and it's always seemed weird to me.

      For the record, I never really agreed with the Microsoft anti-trust shit, either. I know it was fashionable to hate on them back then in "You Will Be Assimilated" era, but that was one thing that I felt Microsoft was totally within it's rights to do. If they prevented you from installing a rival browser, fine, or if they deliberately made a rival browser perform worse than their own, fine...but simply including it's own by default was fine with me. Apple includes Safari with OSX, you can't remove it...does Apple need an anti-trust suit?

    19. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      No kidding. This is not the same situation. Any way you look at it, getting Google to be the default search engine on a fresh Windows install takes more steps than Bing. In fact, it's a testament to how badly Microsoft is doing in the browser and search markets that it still can't get past distant second in search and people in increasing numbers are moving to Chrome.

      In other words it's not because of Google's monopoly that its search has been so successful but because Microsoft's monopoly is failing.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    20. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it ASKS you which search engine you want.

      No, it doesn't if you're in Russia. That's what all the fuss is about - https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=81578

    21. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome is bundled with all kinds of third party software now and gets installed as a clickthrough if you blindly hit "next next" like most people do.

    22. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      When has throwing something in a box that a user might not want been illegal? Nobody complains when a pair of cables is thrown in with a DVD player, when the user might have their own set of cables already.

      Microsoft on the other hand got in trouble because they where leveraging their OS monopoly to take over web browsers. This meant that users had to put in extra effort if they wanted to use a competitors product.

    23. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      It's about not understanding antitrust laws. It's about me not accepting the definition of antitrust in this particular case. Every side has more than one way of looking at it after all.

    24. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Wow - angry much? A simple clarification would have been enough!

    25. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by haruchai · · Score: 2

      It's been a long time since the IE-only browser issue but from what I vaguely recall, my issue with M$ stance was their claim that IE was an intrinsic part of the OS that couldn't be removed ( I believe the judge proved them wrong on the spot ). Since there were critical exploits, because of that IE-Windows integration, M$ was essentially and unnecessarily forcing users on a compromised platform when there were already viable ( arguably better ) alternatives that didn't compromise the entire OS.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    26. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am one of those users that would bother to change the search engine and I must say it is a lot easier with Google Chrome to change the search engine to Bing than it is with IE to change the search engine to Google.
      Chrome lists the most popular search engines and changing it is just a matter of two clicks. In IE it's a tedious task, where you have to search for other search providers, where Google (the most popular choice) is not always listed on the first page and a lot of random crap is suggested instead.

      That Google uses Chrome to harvest even more data from users is obvious, but comparing Chrome to IE in respect to the search engine settings goes too far.

    27. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Threni · · Score: 1

      Uh yeah, if by that you mean `it's the most popular browser`, which it apparently is from time to time (ie people are paid to use IE but opt to use Chrome in their spare time because it's shit-loads better).

    28. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Z34107 · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I installed Chrome it did not pop up a window and offer me a choice of which search engine to use.

      You're either lying or blind, Mr. AC. I installed Chrome just now, and I was greeted with a search engine pop-up. If you miss that, you'll see it every time you right click on the URL bar.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    29. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by zlogic · · Score: 2

      I remember the time when IE dominated the web and it was not pretty. Most sites didn't bother testing compatibility with other browsers - when Firefox 1.0 was finally released, a lot of sites didn't work or display correctly. IE6 was synonymous with stagnation (a popup blocker appeared only in Windows XP SP2, 3 years after IE6 was released!). Most feature-rich or banking sites simply installed their own ActiveX controls or used flash because Javascript in IE was so poor.
      Futhermore, IE versions for Mac and Windows Mobile worked differently from the desktop version. I'd say it's remarkable that today you can expect 99% websites to work properly on any browser or device - a direct consequence of IE losing marketshare, forcing webmasters to care about compatibility with non-IE browsers.
      Although I do admit that IE introduced AJAX before others.

    30. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC due to having moderated already. I'm not sure, "had to go fetch it" is entirely accurate. If I hit google.com when not signed into my account I get a nice big advert in the upper right hand corner of the page with a large "Install Google Chrome" button and the text "A faster way to browse the web". So, they do push it pretty hard and make it dead simple to install it.

      Spot on with your statement pertaining to selecting a search engine.

    31. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I get prompted as well when first using Chromium for which search engine I want to use. I believe the choices were Google, Bing, and Yahoo

    32. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Informative

      Android did not use to come with Chrome. In fact, it is not even available unless you are using Android 4.0, Ice Cream Sandwich. Even then, you need to install it.

      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.android.chrome&hl=en

    33. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He isn't blind. You've just stumbled across Google's underhandedness.

      Chrome actually behaves differently based on different things, such as country. IN the US, Chrome prompts you to chose a search engine because they KNOW you'll choose Google. In Russia they don't do this.

    34. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because IE was bundled with MS, thus you effectively had to pay for it whether you used it or not.

      Asinine argument. Minesweeper is bundled with Windows; effectively, I have to pay for it whether I use it or not.

      My apartment comes with a gas fireplace; I pay for it whether I use it or not.

      Cars come with seat belts, you have to pay for them whether you use them or not.

      The Microsoft issue was a non-issue to begin with, then spiraled out of control to relieve people of even more of their personal responsibility. 'sides, how the fuck were people going to download Netscape without IE installed on the box?

    35. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, nobody was ever forced to buy Windows. Macs come with Safari and yet Macs can get away with bundling.

      "BUT BUT BUT MARKET SHARE!!!!" You say? What about iPads and iPods? They have dominant market share. iPod is almost a generic term now. ...and iTunes is bundled with them. REQUIRED. And iTunes keeps bundling more functiuonality within itself - an app store, Ping social network, etc.

      And what about Google? Google has a monopoly on search engines. But what about mapping? That wasn't there originally, but Google bundled mapping in their website search and PRESTO - now Google Maps dominates. And what about Google+? Google wants to muscle into the social networking arena so BLAMMO - they bundle it in with their monopoly search.

      At what point will the slashdot neckbeards realize that hat8ing Microsoft for including an uninstallable browser in their OS is DUMB and a double-standard compared to the stuff they let other companies get away with?

      I simply can't take this website seriously with all the double-standards.

    36. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I am some sort of Luddite. I go to the search engine page and perform my search from there. I never understand why people care what search engine the browser is set to. Do most people actually type queries in Chrome directly in the address bar (since it doesn't have a search box anymore)? To Luddites like me, that address bar is where you type a URL. You know, like http://www.google.com/ or http://bing.com./ I just tried typing a search into the address bar and it just feels "wrong".

    37. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      IE defaults to Bing and on a few occasions something I've installed in the past (an XP update) changed it back to Bing and in fact changed Firefox to use Bing. Google is happy to leave me using DDG.

    38. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      To be fair the problem came about more after they tied it into the system and made it impossible to get rid of. Nothing forces Chrome on you and it's happy to let you change search engines which I can't say is the same with MS. Perhaps they've changed but in the past one of their updates changed even my Firefox settings to use Bing without my permission. As far as I'm concerned that's an abuse of your position. Defaulting to your own search engine (or browser) isn't an issue if you let people get rid of it when they don't want it and don't actively try to shut out the competition.

    39. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Clsid · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you, but if you look real close about what Chrome is doing, even if you have that instant search feature turned off, the browser will redirect even full urls that you type down like www.something.com to google.com with some unique user id belonging to whatever cookie you have and then finally showing you the website. If that isn't a case to get paranoid I don't know what is.

    40. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      According to Russian laws it IS an illegal practice (the threshold for special treatment is 30% of the relevant mark, Google is close to it).

      Besides, it's a rotten way to compete anyway.

    41. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either lying or blind, Mr. AC. I installed Chrome just now, and I was greeted with a search engine pop-up. If you miss that, you'll see it every time you right click on the URL bar.

      Bwahahahahaha!!!!! That's the prominent pop-up screen that you can't possibly miss and that offers you a list of alternative search engines? You have to be joking! I downloaded Chrome, installed it on my Macbook and fired it up and messed around with it for a while. I did not notice that fantastically prominent pop-up window (where I come from we call that an info bubble), I then set up a fresh user account just to be sure, I saw nothing. If I missed that pathetic little info bubble then the vast majority of new Chrome users will too. You Google fanboys are almost as funny as a round table discussion on Fox News.

    42. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a modder, can someone please mod this guy informative, it is what I came here to say, this whole argument is a load of shit.

    43. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by RMingin · · Score: 1

      When I do a "new" install of Chrome (without signing in to a Google account), it ASKS me what search engine to default to. I believe it was Google, Bing, and Yahoo earlier tonight.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    44. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by tommy8 · · Score: 1

      I think MS was prohibiting OEMs like dell or gateway or whoever from putting Netscape on PCs

    45. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 1

      It's about not understanding antitrust laws. It's about me not accepting the definition of antitrust in this particular case. Every side has more than one way of looking at it after all.

      The idea that there are two, equally valid sides to anything is one of most idiotic inventions of modern entertainment news. Antitrust has a meaning and a distinct purpose. The economics are clear and well demonstrated. The laws are clear in their restrictions and follow logically from the economics. The application of the law to Microsoft's actions is clear. Your acceptance is not needed.

    46. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 1

      Chrome is getting to a stage where its share of the market could be regarded as significant.

      Not in terms of either the economics or legality of antitrust action. Chrome is hovering around 25%. It isn't even the front runner, let alone dominating the market to the extent that it could be used to undermine competition. 70% is a guideline often used by regulators for when to start investigating potential antitrust issues.

    47. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's odd, back in the 90s, I could open Internet Explorer and download, then install Netscape, and Windows would honour my selection of browser. Sure its set as default, you need something there in order to go get the one you want to use, but that's hardly shutting out the competition.

      Oddly enough, that was considered highly anti-competitive and deemed illegal, a whole anti-trust lawsuit errupted over it, people are such whiners, aren't they?

    48. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The judge coulsn't have proved them wrong, much less "on the spot". There was originally no difference between IE and WE, IE was in and of itself, the Windows 95 UI, which is what made things like Active Desktop possible, the built-in help system was all IE-based. It's very much like how OS X and KDE integrate WebKit/Core and KHTML everywhere. Besides that, there the whole Active-X security nightmare, which couldn't have been a ywhere near as bad as it was, had IE not been so deeply integrated into the system as it was.

      It's not as deeply integrated as it used to be, but for little more than the lulz, grab a copy of XPLite and remove all IE-related components from even Windows XP (and no cheating by leaving the rendering engine in place), and watch as all kinds of stuff starts acting strange or outright breaking in all kinds of weird ways, probably most noticibly, Windows Update.

      So in short, no, you recall incorrectly.

    49. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      If it was so scientific, there wouldn't be a long drawn out court case with many reversals and appeals. Instead, we should all settle antitrust disputes using a simple computer program right? True, not all views are valid. That doesn't mean that there CAN'T be two views to an issue.

    50. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Javascript in IE... Poor?
      The things that were being done with DHTML and xmlhttprequest, at least from a UI perspective, where just nuts, some with longer, less hate-restricted memories could argue that the current web 2'0 hooplah is only just beginning to catch up to IE6. There are still things I can't do now, that I could with IE4-6 (free-form, chromeless UI design, being one, right-to-left orientation being another, and all those fun things you could do by plugging right into DX)

    51. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a load of shit and you know it. The user still had to install the competitor's product from disk to use it, IE being included in Windows did absolutely zero to to prevent it - if nothing else, the inclusion of IE meant that the user had to put in even less effort if they wanted yo use a competing product by using IE to browse to, and download said cxompeting product.

      The worst part is that any unfair advantage that would have been confered by bundling IE was rendered irrelevent by the fact that post Netscape 2, IE was the vastly superior product, and had a commanding lead in the market even before being bundled with the OS, it was for this reason, after all, that IE was bundled in the first place!

    52. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      Sure it starts out set to Google by default, it kind of has to be set to something, but that's hardly "shutting out the competition".

      You're missing the point, google sycophant. Chrome should offer a choice during installation. Not doing so ensures an uneven playing field.

    53. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your son enjoy having a typo for his given name? Yes, I know it was/is apparently faddish amongst the uneducated, and that as a result, there's a plethora of US athletes of African ancestry with that name, but everyone else in the world looks at that and thinks "Too bad for the kid that his parents couldn't spell". Oh well, I guess he can get it changed or go by "Ali" or "Andy" when he gets old enough to realise that Mommy and Daddy fucked up...

    54. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0

      "close to" != "is". Thanks for playing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    55. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Not sure what your point is. His point is that Google is acting in a malicious manner. Do you deny that?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    56. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      The long drawn out court cases are there because it's possible to use the law to stall the process. That still doesn't change the simple, basic facts of the matter.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    57. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      70%? No, the limit is well below that. 30-40% or so, I think. And the point is that Chrome is growing fast.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    58. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by maroberts · · Score: 1

      There's no typo; my (ex) g/f chose it, and since his ancestry is black English on mummys side, I see little wrong in him having a name associated with African ancestry.

      I'm perfectly aware of Dante being the possible Italian/Latin original of the name. As I have a degree plus college level English I don't think spelling is a problem for me (with a few exceptions).

      As you've said, he's also got a perfectly sensible middle name (which I chose), and there's little wrong with shortening Donte to Don if he wants later. But having said that, having an unusual name also makes you memorable which can be an advantage.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    59. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      in chrome and firefox the address bar is also a search bar. Makes it easier than going to the actual site to type what you're looking for.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    60. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 1

      If it was so scientific, there wouldn't be a long drawn out court case with many reversals and appeals. Instead, we should all settle antitrust disputes using a simple computer program right?

      The lengthy nature of MS's prosecution had something to do with money, money donated to politicians who replaced the judges on the case with those those beholden to them. Money has always undermined the US legal system to a significant extent and there is a huge body of scientific evidence for that as well if you actually care to be informed.

      Every side has more than one way of looking at it after all.

      The idea that there are two, equally valid sides to anything is one of most idiotic inventions of modern entertainment news.

      True, not all views are valid. That doesn't mean that there CAN'T be two views to an issue.

      No, there can be many valid perspectives and opinions on topics. I never said otherwise. There is not, however, always two equally valid opinions on a topic. Often one side of an argument is simply uninformed or irrational. Your implication that because there are multiple ways of looking at the antitrust issue in question, that disagreeing with a logical and factually supported analysis without providing and backing for it is fine... well that is a very popular sort of opinion these days and one I find repugnant and anti-intellectual. It's right up there with, "scientific studies reproduced across the globe show A, but irrational mystics also have an opinion based on their feelings. Lets spend an hour giving them a soapbox to promote their attack on reason and science."

    61. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I'd consider it *possibly* malicious (a) if Google were holding 60+% of the market and Yandex 25% rather than the other way round, and (b) if you couldn't download/install 3 or 4 other major browsers on all major platforms in localised versions, and (c) if you couldn't change the search provider in Chrome at all.

      My point is that his argument boils down to "ZOMG Google have 5/6 of the market share needed to trigger Russian anti-competitiveness laws" as though it's the same as having 6/6 of that amount, which it is not.

      Since Yandex have more than double Google's share, and since it's not like it's impossible even now to change search providers in Chrome.ru (we're talking a couple of extra clicks, no?) and *nobody is forcing anyone to use Chrome in Russia or anywhere else*, it sounds to me more like Yandex are just whinging because they actually have to compete in what they'd like consider their very own captive market. (At least until Google have increased their market share by another 20% of its current level.)

      On a personal note, I've used Yandex, and it seems pretty crappy (do they even know what SEO spam is, and how to filter for it?), and Google actually provides better Russian-language results AFAICT. Of course, I am not a native speaker, and YMMV in any case.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    62. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on fitting me into one of your predefined stereotypes of people who assume that all arguments are valid like anti evolution crazy people or climate change deniers when I didn't mean what you imply at all. Do you get some kind of moral satisfaction by finding ways by which you can find yourself superior to other people?

    63. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do climate change deniers vehmently stick to their views despite the scientific evidence? Check. Are you sticking to you views despite the scientific evidence? Check. Its hard to blame him when your behavior is very similar to the climate change deniers.

    64. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Opera made a better browser, and had an uphill battle trying to get users to download it.

    65. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Does it change any if you see Google Chrome essentially as a free tool that you can download in order to use the Google search engine?

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    66. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by psiclops · · Score: 1

      Are you sticking to you views despite the scientific evidence? Check

      which scientific evidence is he apparently 'ignoring'?

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    67. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it was changed back 6 months ago:
          http://codereview.chromium.org/8393025

    68. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was re-enabled 6 months ago:
              http://codereview.chromium.org/8393025

    69. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Why should it offer a choice during install? Tell me?
      If google wants to write a browser that only uses google for search, they certainly would be within their rights. Your rights would be to use it as is, or not use it.
      That's all their is to it.
      YOU DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to use software in a way the author doesn't want you to.

      That being said, if there is a method to change it, but not as easy as you like it, well that's just too damned bad. Stop using it.

    70. Re:Chrome doesn't offer a choice? News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't prompt me either Mr. Googlefan, not in the US or Russia... (Happy Chrome user never the less)

  3. Chrome is a choice by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Don't like what it does, don't install it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  4. On a Mac, Chrome lets you choose a search provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I installed Chrome on my Mac it asked me whether I wanted to use Google, Bing or Yahoo. I think it even randomizes the order in which the choices appear, to avoid bias for the first entry. I don't think it ever asks on Ubuntu. I'm not sure about windows.

  5. Chrome DOES offer a choce by melted · · Score: 2

    When first installed, it lets you select between Yahoo, Google and Bing (so basically between Google and Bing, because Yahoo uses Bing for search).

    1. Re:Chrome DOES offer a choce by icebike · · Score: 1

      Once installed, you can also hit the Manage Search Engines button in settings and us any of dozens. (Some of which just offload back to Google, but that's their issue).

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Chrome DOES offer a choce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. But not in Russia, which is what this story is about. Source: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=81578

  6. Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Chrome is free. It doesn't cost a penny. Nothing (not counting incompetence) stops Yandex from creating their own free browser that defaults to Yandex. And for the M$ Weenies out there who will surely object prior to getting a clue, the right to use Explorer is purchased when you buy M$ garbage.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brother speaks the truth.

    2. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by peppepz · · Score: 1
      Google is a for-profit company that competes on the ad market. It makes money out of Chrome (proof of it is the fact that they're marketing it very aggressively through paid banners). The fact that they don't sell it directly is not relevant to the fact that they could attain a dominant position in the ad market. In that case they would be in the same situation as Microsoft in the OS market, so IMHO they could be forced to offer a "choice screen" when you install Chrome, just like Microsoft were forced to do with Windows.

      Many comments here say that Chrome already offers such a screen; if it's so, then I think they're already OK.

    3. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome is not free. You pay for it with your privacy! If you don't believe me run a tcpdump on your local machine and you'll see it for yourself. Chrome phones home all the time, and that's not the worst part.

      --
      Sundar Pichai's incompetence costed me my job. Fuck him and his fucking family!

    4. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a choice screen when you install Chrome.

    5. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by just_a_monkey · · Score: 1

      What is the worst part?

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    6. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by swillden · · Score: 1

      Many comments here say that Chrome already offers such a screen; if it's so, then I think they're already OK.

      It does. Does IE offer a choice of search engines the first time you run it?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It does.

      That depends.

      (that code is gone in more recent releases, but it's been there for several months)

      Does IE offer a choice of search engines the first time you run it?

      It does, but it's not straightforward - it basically asks you if you want to use Bing or "something else", and it will only show the selector if you pick the latter.

    8. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by peppepz · · Score: 1

      There's a choice screen before installing IE itself, so the problem is solved at a lowe level.

    9. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by chromas · · Score: 1

      They're long-distance calls. Also, it clogged my toilet last week.

    10. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      There is a choice screen when you install Chrome.

      I just installed Chrome with a user account created specially for the occasion. I didn't see that choice screen. All I got was a nag screen asking me to make Chrome the default browser for this user, but at least Chrome gave me the option of saying 'no'. If you click your way into the Chrome settings menu Google does offer a very basic "Manage Search Engines..." wizard that comes with four pre-installed search engines, Google, Bing, Yahoo and a local engine that specializes in my native language. You can also add other search engines on your own if you are familiar with URL variables and printf style format strings. It's simple enough for a geek but I'm betting most non geeky users (which would be 99.99% of the Google Chrome using public) would not know how to add a search engine that isn't in that list by default.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    11. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use chromium and stop whining you chucklefuck.

    12. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      As you search other websites, it automatically adds them to that search engine listing. Mine has CNN, Pirate Bay, Amazon, Best Buy, and a slew of others available.

    13. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Chrome collects search engines in "Manage Search Engines...". All you have to do is manually open a search engine and do one search, Chrome will then add it to the list.

    14. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I buy a Windows license, I have indeed bought a license to use Internet Explorer (and Explorer, also known as Windows Explorer). However, if I buy the garbage from an MS campus I don't get the rights to use Internet Explorer. Oh, I see - you are claiming that Windows is garbage. How quaint. And stupid. It obviously isn't garbage. I can't think of an operating system that is garbage. Perhaps Hurd? But then I digress. Perhaps you haven't used any edition of Windows except for Windows ME? That one was close to garbage. Or maybe you're just sort of a dork?

    15. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      It also seems to import some from Internet Explorer. I use Chrome, Firefox, and IE. At work, we have IE by default (and I need it for SharePoint), but I use Firefox for most stuff and Chrome once in awhile. At home, I use Chrome for most stuff, Firefox once in awhile, and I had to use IE to do my taxes (for some reason some add-in in Chrome blocked Turbo Tax from working so I used IE). Since I have Chrome sync my settings - it has imported search engines in my list that are internal to my work network. They can't be used at all at home - but there are three of them in my list on this Windows 8 beta machine (as I type this in Chrome). So it definitely brings them along from machine to machine. I've never used them in Chrome at work - so it had to grab them from IE.

    16. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by swillden · · Score: 1

      It does.

      That depends.

      (that code is gone in more recent releases, but it's been there for several months)

      Very interesting. There's no explanation in the commit that added it, nor the commit review, nor the commit or review when it was removed. It was removed just a few days after someone posted a complaint on the review of the commit that added it.

      Does IE offer a choice of search engines the first time you run it?

      It does, but it's not straightforward - it basically asks you if you want to use Bing or "something else", and it will only show the selector if you pick the latter.

      I'm impressed they went that far. It's still a far cry from Chrome's three big buttons, making it look like changing the search engine is some obscure customization that only the knowledgeable or the adventurous should try, but better than I expected.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It was removed just a few days after someone posted a complaint on the review of the commit that added it.

      It was still there in October 2011 (search for "ru"), just moved around a bit. Next revision from that is the one that removed it. So it was there from May till October.

      I'm impressed they went that far. It's still a far cry from Chrome's three big buttons, making it look like changing the search engine is some obscure customization that only the knowledgeable or the adventurous should try, but better than I expected.

      You'd be surprised at how efficient several billion dollars in fines is at making companies behave better. No-one wants to be that next guy whom they can point at saying "he's the one that made the decision that cost us that".

    18. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by hkmwbz · · Score: 2

      Just like nothing stopped other browser vendors from creating their own desktop OS to compete with MSIE?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    19. Re:Hello, Ilya McFly !!! by swillden · · Score: 1

      It was removed just a few days after someone posted a complaint on the review of the commit that added it.

      It was still there in October 2011 (search for "ru"), just moved around a bit. Next revision from that is the one that removed it. So it was there from May till October.

      October is when the complaint was posted on the review, and a few days later it was removed.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. Chrome asks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When installed, to choose between Yahoo, Bing and Google. Its been like this for a while. This guy should try installing chrome again.

  8. This man *is* a loser, period. by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google was guilty of foul play with its Chrome browser, which picks the company's own search engine as default for users, rather than offering a choice between rivals including Yahoo, Bing and Yandex."

    The gentleman Ilya Segalovich must be a very interesting individual.

    I have a solution for him:

    I think the time is ripe for him to unleash the Yandex browser to the world, why not?

    Good luck my man!

    1. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This man manages 5th most popular search engine in the world. By any means he s not a looser.

    2. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looser

      No, the real "loosers" are the people that spell a simple words like loser correctly.

    3. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion Google shills are bigger losers than people who misspell simple words or those who have only the 5th most popular search engine (I'm yet another AC BTW)

    4. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I think the time is ripe for him to unleash the Yandex browser to the world, why not?

      They do just that (and some more).

      But doesn't seem to be helping much.

    5. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in Russia there are chromium based browsers that have Russian default search engines:
      example:
      http://internet.mail.ru/

      And some time ago it was even called "chrome" and had the same logo as chrome. Which was very confusing.

    6. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am genuinely surprised that 1.7% of the search market is Russian.

      Anyways, it strikes me more like another case of the Russian persecution complex than anything else. The "Cheating West" is the perfect foil whenever things aren't quite going Ivan's way.

    7. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Persecution complex? Google specifically disabled the selection screen in Russia. Are you saying everyone is imagining this?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    8. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This yandex has been a spamming hub for years, not legitimate and def not a player worthy of a defense from google

      The ill gotten gains this traffic monopoly supposdly gets from spam, is legendary

    9. Re:This man *is* a loser, period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this fandrivel modded up. Didn't read the article? It's tough I know. He had a legit complaint, in Russia it specifically does not prompt you to chose a search engine (like it does here)

  9. Wrong order by Haedrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm quite sure that most people who use Google Chrome do so after finding out about it because they use Google as a search engine.

    So its basically the other way around.

    Moreoever, you can change the default search engine, so WOW, issue solved!

    Also the only reason I ever heard of Yandex was because I saw their scraper on my website. I had never heard about it before. I guess Google is doing a GREAT job choking them.

    1. Re:Wrong order by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't know about Yandex unless you're in Russia - they're a locally dominant service, much like Baidu is for China, but they focus primarily on serving that market. So all that talk should really be taken in the context of Russian market alone, not global market.

    2. Re:Wrong order by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      "Also the only reason I ever heard of Yandex was because I saw their scraper on my website. I had never heard about it before. I guess Google is doing a GREAT job choking them."

      Yandex is the most popular search engine in the xUSSR. It understands Russian (also Ukrainian and Belorussian) languages much better than Google. Besides, Yandex directly competes with Google Maps, Google Mail and other services in Russia. And quite successfully, in fact.

      For English-speaking people Yandex is not really useful (its homepage is not even completely translated into English). Personally, I use Yandex when I need to search for something in Russian and Google all other times.

  10. Google Chrome asks you to choose a search engine. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    Google Chrome has always asked me to choose a search engine for as long as i can remember. Maybe they should include more search engines, but it does not default to Google Search.

    http://techhamlet.com/2010/09/google-know-about-the-other-search-engines/

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  11. Most people use the default search setting by Animats · · Score: 2

    Google pays Apple $100 million a year to be the default search engine on the iPhone. Google pays Mozilla $125 million a year to be the default search engine on Firefox. Most Bing traffic comes from the default setting in Internet Explorer. Few people actually change their default search engine setting.

    This has some strong implications for the search industry. First, most users don't care which search engine they're using. Second, search has negative value - search engines are an ad medium that has to pay to be seen.

    1. Re:Most people use the default search setting by therealobsideus · · Score: 1

      Curious, does Google pay the mobile carriers to keep the Android default search option as Google? Would be counter-intuitive, to me at least, as the phone integrates so perfectly with Google services.

    2. Re:Most people use the default search setting by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 2

      search has negative value

      Your argument generalizes to the idea that any product for which the seller pays for shelf space has negative value. This occurs pretty much anywhere that distributor intermediaries have sufficient market power to abuse it, specifically where customers choose the distributor intermediary based on more considerations than solely which third party service (e.g. search engine) they offer.

      Kindly troll elsewhere.

    3. Re:Most people use the default search setting by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Curious, does Google pay the mobile carriers to keep the Android default search option as Google? Would be counter-intuitive, to me at least, as the phone integrates so perfectly with Google services.

      no, they just strong arm them with access to early android builds and the ability to put google market& other google licensed wares on them.
      oh and there was this one android maker putting bing on their phones and now google is completing the process of buying them.

      integrates perfectly? the other services integrate just as well and that layer in which they do integrate isn't really core layer and why the fuck would it be..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  12. Yandex? Ewww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yandex? Ewww...
    That crap usually spits out lots of SEO-optimized bullshit but nothing useful

  13. Google and Chrome are not open! by Lost+Found · · Score: 1, Funny

    I demand they set the default search engine to my new project, ButtSearch, immediately!

    1. Re:Google and Chrome are not open! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was a TSA product...

  14. It Does Play Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats strange
    after a fresh new install of chrome on any system, MAC/LINUX/WINDOWS
    i was offered an option to choose a default search engine between Google, Yahoo and Bing.

    1. Re:It Does Play Fair by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      The search selection screen was specifically disabled for Russia.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  15. Russians are scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evey time I see that scumbag from Dr. Web trying to blackmail Apple I remember what a shitty country it is.

    1. Re:Russians are scum by BanHammor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because who screams loudest is obviously an average individual.

    2. Re:Russians are scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next Slashdot poll should be "Slashdot's most hated race"

      Chinese
      Indians
      Mexicans
      Russians
      Jews
      Niggers

    3. Re:Russians are scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually live in a mixed neighborhood with mostly Spanish and black but the other day I was on the upper east side and like everybody was white and Asian, omg it was so awesome! It may not be politically correct but hanging around with educated gainfully employed non-violent law abiding citizens was a major revelation. Mainly time to move out of this shit hole to some where civilized, astronomical rents be damned.

  16. Re:Google Chrome asks you to choose a search engin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's because Google have restricted the ability to select your search engine in Chrome specifically if you have a Russian locale.

  17. Doesn't Chrome let you choose after installation? by schitso · · Score: 1

    It's been a long time since I installed Chrome, but I thought I recalled a window popping up letting you choose one of three search providers as default?

  18. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use google search because my browser/phone makes me.. I use Android because it uses google search by default, and other reasons.

  19. No.. Google has several deals with OEMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google spends several hundred millions of dollars to force chrome as default. they also bundle it with several other software and it becomes default browser and with google as default search engine without asking the user.

    http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/sony-defaults-to-google-chrome/

    http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-chrome-dell-sony/13055/

    but just as someone could have downloaded Netscape using IE in Windows 98 they can change default search to bing in chrome. you either have a problem with both .. or you have a problem with none.

  20. yandex version of chromium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yandex distributes a modified/rebranded version of Chromium: http://browser.yandex.ru/

    In a twist of the unexpected, Yandex Chromium doesn't ask me if I want to change the default search engine away from Yandex, though it does have the same search engine switcher in settings (with Yandex at the top).

  21. waaambulance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yandex is a world leader in spammyness. i can't wait for them to shut down.

  22. Astroturfing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - First, an article asking about bias against M$;
    - Now, another proposing a choice among his search engine and M$-based ones;
    - What next? Santa's secret identity finally uncovered as being Bill?

    Come on, these people cannot possibly believe the public is that much stupid, can they?

    1. Re:Astroturfing. by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      The co-founder of Yandex in Russia is doing astroturfing for Microsoft?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  23. On kubuntu it asks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed Chrome on my Kubuntu machine few months ago and it did ask me which search engine I want to use. For some reason I just had to select Bing.

    1. Re:On kubuntu it asks by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      It specifically leaves out this option in Russia. You know... don't do evil?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  24. In former microsoft world ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is no reason why Google cannot be persuaded to sell its soul and join the Dark Side

    They just have to set the "evil bit".

  25. Re:On a Mac, Chrome lets you choose a search provi by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

    It does that on all platforms on first run. But there was a time when it did not do that if you had LANG="ru".

  26. Yandex has different censorship rules than google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also the only reason I ever heard of Yandex was because I saw their scraper on my website. I had never heard about it before.

    So, you live in a small world. It's no great surprise. You're probably american.

    Yandex is a good backup for the ever-increasing list of topics which "america" fears and feels it must "censor" in order to maintain the red-white-and-blue wall.

  27. Re:Doesn't Chrome let you choose after installatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not if you're in Russia, as Yandex is better there - https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=81578

  28. Re:Google Chrome asks you to choose a search engin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    Note that this code is no longer present in the trunk (unless they moved it elsewhere)?

  29. Re:Yandex has different censorship rules than goog by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    You're probably american.

    Yandex is a good backup for the ever-increasing list of topics which "america" fears and feels it must "censor" in order to maintain the red-white-and-blue wall.

    Incorrect. I'm Maltese.

    Also are you suggesting that a russian website is less prone to censorship? What an interesting role reversal.

  30. After the Jump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    From the website link...
    Comments on this page are now closed.

    Isn't that convienient?

    comments moderated as well.
    Dark mood calls the bluff, leaving a seed story in the rough.
    Thanks for telling us the horse has left the barn, which is now the center of the universe, and under complete control.

    If Sergey really cared, he would quit with massive publicity protest, and underwrite a few thousand public access shows to raise awareness.

    $60 * 1000 = $60,000 , I'm a billionaire I can take it

  31. Google already won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't call it "I'm going to Yandex that" you say "I'm going to Google that" I jokingly said the other day to "Bing something" and my boss said what is Bing? I told him its that search engine you get when you put info in the address bar on IE. He always types google.com in there and searches from there. Every time someone needs to do a search they will think Google that and go to Google.com. sorry Yandex.

  32. A must read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This many refers to: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=81578

    Yandex is not small, they are a corporation, they are no google but still...

    One commenter says it best:

    In Soviet Russia Google choose users.

    Just one patch and see what you have done with Yandex:
    http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/yndx/stock-chart

  33. How about... by jimboindeutchland · · Score: 1

    ...you build your own free web browser and set your search engine as the default? Google don't have a monopoly on the browser market. Heul doch.

    --
    this post is now diamonds!
    1. Re:How about... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      There's an issue here, and it's one Microsoft faced as well. It doesn't matter that Yandex would make a browser just like Google does if Google is abusing its dominance in one market to take over another. Microsoft abused its OS monopoly to take over the browser market, which was a violation of competition law.

      If Google's browser is dominant in Russia, and at the same time "forces" people to use Google's search engine in Russia, that could well be an example of anti-competitive practices.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  34. Yandex ? by Pop69 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They're the ones who seem to ignore my robots.txt.

    Admittedly it may be someone posing as their spider, I blocked them anyway just to be on the safe side.

  35. Yandex may have flipped their evil bit. by dweller_below · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have seen Yandex searching wide ranges of IPs for web servers. See: https://it.wiki.usu.edu/20111007_BeEvil You may want to give some thought to blocking the Russian Google-wanna-be Yandex. They may have have flipped their 'Evil' bit. In 2012, you should not find public web servers by scanning for TCP/80 and TCP/443. If you want to find public web servers, you spider the web. Or ask Google. If you scan the internet for TCP/80 and TCP/443, you will find private management interfaces. You find printers, routers, switches, control systems, web cams, network attached storage devices, and work-flow services. You will probably find more SCADA devices than actual public web servers. The results of this search are of great interest to the hacking community. It has very limited utility for anybody else. This is not trustworthy internet behavior.

    1. Re:Yandex may have flipped their evil bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to take your medicine.

      All search engines do this. Google goes one better with it's "malformed URL search"

    2. Re:Yandex may have flipped their evil bit. by NynexNinja · · Score: 1

      It's pure paranoia to think that a web (HTTP) crawler is doing something malicious by looking for open HTTP servers. That is like saying that a SMTP crawler looking for open mail relays to add to a blacklist is doing something malicious by scanning networks looking for open SMTP servers.

    3. Re:Yandex may have flipped their evil bit. by dweller_below · · Score: 0

      It's pure paranoia to think that a web (HTTP) crawler is doing something malicious by looking for open HTTP servers. That is like saying that a SMTP crawler looking for open mail relays to add to a blacklist is doing something malicious by scanning networks looking for open SMTP servers.

      Well, yah. But:

      1. We have closely monitored our part of the internet for years. No other search engine behaves like this.
      2. A University really, REALLY doesn't want anybody indexing all the things that respond to TCP/80. Again, Yandex is the only one trying.
      3. They pay me good money for that paranoia.

      And, yes, we also react to any other form of external vulnerability analysis, including TCP/25 scanning. It's funny. There is an endless number of hackers willing to find our vulnerabilities, but they almost never give us a chance to fix the problems. It's amazing the number of people trying to make a buck out of our misfortune. Here was a fun one: https://it.wiki.usu.edu/20120101_China_Test

      Miles

    4. Re:Yandex may have flipped their evil bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Password protect your internal stuff. Even though google spiders the web, they list numerous unpassworded, meant to be internal, ftps. It doesn't depend on the method used, but on whenever you configure your stuff properly.

  36. Blocking Yandex by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 0

    I have had to block yandex from all my servers as it indexes sites oddly.

  37. Yandex Who? by gktozer · · Score: 0

    I've selected the google search engine in any browser I currently use as I find it retrieves the most relevant searches for what "I" am after. If Yandex did what I was after, I'd probably give it a shot. Currently not.

  38. Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yandex began as a rebadged carbon copy of Yahoo, just as vkontakte just ripped off Facebook (right down to the colour scheme). When Russia can actually innovate, only then will their technology companies be taken seriously.

  39. Still WebKit, and still Google search by tepples · · Score: 1

    Even if Android doesn't come with Google Chrome per se, it comes with Android Browser, which uses the same WebKit engine as Chrome. Android Browser on my Android device also defaults to Google search.

  40. on some topics non-us sites have less censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also are you suggesting that a russian website is less prone to censorship? What an interesting role reversal.

    for some topics it definitely is less prone to censorship, as gp said. this might not fit your stereotype, though, which in turn might lead to you rejecting the message.

  41. Re:Yandex has different censorship rules than goog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if so, it would censor different topics, wouldn't it?

  42. Re:Yandex has different censorship rules than goog by jvkjvk · · Score: 0

    Please give me a list of keywords to search for to back up your allegation.

    I feel you are probably provably full of shit, so a list of key words or names could prove you right.

    I doubt they will be forthcoming.

  43. Re:Yandex has different censorship rules than goog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the AC you replied to.

    it would censor different topics, wouldn't it?

    Yes, that is my assumption as well.

    Whom do you totally trust besides yourself? A realist would surely say no-one. The world is driven by agendas and those, for better or (mostly) for worse, shape societies and their perspectives, policies, politics and forms of oppression.

    I am an equal-opportunity distruster. I trust no-one else's (or their countryâ(TM)s agenda), no matter how good, blunt, forceful, poor or bad their propaganda and enforcement may be.

    Nowhere did I say that yandex should be used exclusively (any sole-sourcing of information that matters is incredibly naive and lazy). I said that it was a backup. Perhaps I should have said alternative since the term backup, like so many written English terms and phrases, is rife with ambiguity (modern English is a very sparse and economical language, but that economy comes about often at the expense of clarity).

    My point is this: everything (including all search engines) have agendas (some self-chosen and some imposed form outside but accepted as necessary evil or too costly [in the general meaning of the word, not just money] to fight) and no one search engine can be trusted to be totally free of any agenda.

  44. Re:Yandex has different censorship rules than goog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guessed your nationality wrong. It was a cheap shot based on a generalization of where I see most naive and/or blinkered thinking coming from these days (fyi, I come from a land that rates near the top in freedom (not the us, russia or malta and not large [by population]).

    are you suggesting that a russian website is less prone to censorship?

    No. Never. Nor have I EVER said or suggested as much.

    How good is your English? I assume that you misinterpreted my comment. Perhaps this comment of mine will help you understand more clearly.

    What an interesting role reversal.

    A very pointless and silly statement, given that your reply conveys a total misunderstanding of my comment.

    Yet your completely incorrect comment rests modded at +2, proving again that the Slashdot "moderation system" is just a popularity vote, not based on correctness. And that being popular has nothing to do with being correct. The Slashdot "moderation system" is just a censorship mechanism.

    UID 1676506 ?!? When were you born, last year?

    My UID is below 50,000 and I have tons of karma, but unlike many of you. I want my comments to stand on merit, not popularity, so I never log in any more.

    Then again, this site is a farce, not the Slashdot that I joined.

  45. Marx-kets, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knew? A f@$king socialist who doesn't understand how the market works?

  46. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It boggles my mind that Microsoft was criticized (and legally shackled) for including Internet Explorer and allowing other browsers to exist on the desktop when Apple gets a pass for not even allowing Amazon to have a "buy' button or link to their web store in the Kindle app. It's time for Microsoft shareholders to get legal reparations from the US government.

  47. Fuck the god damn popups. by AdamJS · · Score: 1

    I would FAR rather have my browser NOT bug me about trivial shit that I can adjust at any time.

    1. Re:Fuck the god damn popups. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now now remember that we now live in the age of ADHD kiddies who can't be bothered with reading or expending effort to learn anything beyond the very basics. I blame video games where they all whine if not every piece of text is voice acted, after all rredding is teh hard and stuff.

      And in new Soviet Russia search engine chooses you.

  48. Is that yo Ilya? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Did you even think before you typed? Ford could develop their own tires, but no matter how great those tires were, they wouldn't compete with a car, only other tires.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Is that yo Ilya? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      But what if Ford was competing in the tire market, and some car manufacturer with a monopoly decided to abuse its monopoly to destroy the tire market?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    2. Re:Is that yo Ilya? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the moon was made of cheese?

  49. Chrome doesn't offer a choice of Search? by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "Ilya Segalovich, co-founder of Russia's leading search engine, Yandex .. suggested Google was guilty of foul play with its Chrome browser, which picks the company's own search engine as default for users, rather than offering a choice between rivals including Yahoo, Bing and Yandex.

    That's not true, at least on my version. The default is Google, and under that a popdown menu offering `Ask Jeeves', Yahoo or Bing. Unlike ms Internet Explorer which defaults to Bing and doesn't mention Google Search.

    --
    AccountKiller
  50. Chrome on installation asks to choose search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It gives options of Yahoo , Google and Bing. . and these are most popular ones!