Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Patent Hints At Search Results Tailored To User's Mood, Intelligence

theodp writes "A newly surfaced Microsoft patent application, reports GeekWire, describes a 'user-following engine' that analyzes your posts on Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites to deduce your mood, interests, and even your smarts. The system would then automatically adjust the search experience and results to better match those characteristics, explains Microsoft, such as changing the background color of the search interface to suit your mood, or bringing back only those search results that won't strain your feeble brain. From the patent application: 'In addition to skewing the search results to the user's inferred interests, the user-following engine may further tailor the search results to a user's comprehension level. For example, an intelligent processing module may be directed to discerning the sophistication and education level of the posts of a user. Based on that inference, the customization engine may vary the sophistication level of the customized search result.'"

34 of 146 comments (clear)

  1. But isn't this Microsoft all over? by troff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You do what you need to do, people. Don't exercise your tiny little grey cells. You don't need to learn anything new. You don't need to stretch yourselves or make yourselves better. Just leave it all in our hands. That's better. Go back to sleep now.

    1. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't exercise your tiny little grey cells. You don't need to learn anything new. You don't need to stretch yourselves or make yourselves better. Just leave it all in our hands.

      Huh. I think you mean Apple. It just works!

    2. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by troff · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're also right. Ever since I started supporting people with iPads, I accepted the truth of that.

    3. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by Genda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More than that, don't look for any possible truths outside of your opinions and existing personal prejudices. If you can't face facts, then design a system that gladly tells you the lies you want to hear. Promotes your ignorance and panders to your stupidity. This isn't convenience, its self perpetuating brain damage.

    4. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      b) I think you're conflating grandparent's use of "It just works" meaning "don't think or customise, just use what we give you", with the idea of these Apple products really, genuinely "just working".

      I think you are confusing the tool with the product. You folks sound like the diesel mechanic who hates all the truck drivers because they are stupid in your mind. The computer is a tool, you are there to keep it running.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by troff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You sound like the person who doesn't understand that we diesel mechanics keep meeting so many truck drivers who can't comprehend what the truck is and is not capable of doing.

      They buy into the iTruck hype and keep assuming that the damn thing will keep driving itself down the I-95 while they have a quick kip behind the wheel. And then blame us when they end up in a ditch.

      Hence, me bringing up the point of the meanings being conflated. It, contrary to popular (indeed, encouraged) belief, doesn't just work. Hence, the diesel mechanics tend to think less of the truck drivers who haven't bothered to ever look under their hoods; and berate us for making the mere suggestion that they might consider doing so.

    6. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It, contrary to popular (indeed, encouraged) belief, doesn't just work.

      Respectfully, nothing "just works".

      You may, or may not, choose to hate those who give you work. You may, or may not choose to believe that people who do not know something that you do, are somehow inferior.

      But to bring this back to the Apple versus PC, Chevy versus Ford pissing contest, It takes a special kind of foolishness to state that Apple users are idiots who don't know a thing about their computers. I supported Apples, Windows, and even a bit of Linux, and I've found it very advantageous career and pay wise to look at the customer as a resource, not some sort of idiot ranked by OS. How's superiority over the customer work out for you?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by troff · · Score: 2

      Respectfully, nothing "just works".

      Funnily enough, I do believe that's the point on which we were previously relying.

      You seem to be bringing a lot of personal snark into this. Not to mention, this was never originally pointed at any of the users (as you're quite clearly saying with your "inferiority" comments).

      This was about Microsoft's plan to circumscribe search results depending on the user's "mood" and "intelligence"; what this implies in a future when people are already burying their heads in the sand, as it is.

      And - I'll reiterate, seeing as you seem to have missed this the first time - this is about people who keep using these tools and
      choose to not learn more about the tools they're using. Would you like me to say that I feel superior over people who refuse to learn things; when I don't refuse to learn things outside of my own scope? Would that satisfy your need to feel superior?

      Furthermore, you comment about stating "Apple users are idiots who don't know a thing about their computers"; I would rather say that "people using Apple or Windows and don't know anything and refuse repeatedly to learn about their tools are idiots".

      ... much like people who can't seem to read comments with a sufficient level of comprehension, but with plenty of personal issues brought in to cloud said comprehension.

    8. Re:But isn't this Microsoft all over? by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Get real, in this case the headline should read M$ patents delusion. Have you ever heard of speech recognition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_recognition, after all these years and all the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on it it still sucks. To get anywhere near accurate you have to train the person and software, the person has to remain sober and always speak in the manner they have been trained by the software to maintain. Open speech recognition is still many years off.

      This patent claim is about taking what you've typed in and based upon passed wildly intrusive privacy invasion, guess what your actually searching for.

      I have helped people search, in fact doing it for them and they often struggle to provide a clear verbal description of what they are really after, even after personally knowing them and listening to them for a few minutes. Only once the search is being done and results come up can you compare the results to what they are telling you to finally really understand what they are after.

      M$ is simply filing a patent on something they are incapable of doing just in case someone can do it. A quick review of the patent indicates that it wildly infringes upon privacy laws. Reading it seems, this patent seems to be more about throwing out a patent net for each of the described functions rather than the whole patent. A whole bunch of submarine patents.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by jchoyt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...they treat us all like morons. Their business practices have been predatory in the past and unecessarily nasty - and that comes in a close number two reason. But I can't stand using their products because they are always "helping". And now they're gonna screw with SEARCH RESULTS? Their OS is bad...Office is worse. THIS is insulting.

    --
    Sometimes the truth is arrived at by adding all the little lies together and deducting them from all that is known.
    1. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All the big names treat their customers like morons. Apple makes computers and phone tailored to fit the needs of imbeciles. Google customizes searches so you don't need to do any footwork to find what you are looking for. Microsoft does the same. Its how to sell a lot of products nowadays, people want all their thinking done for them.

    2. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The funniest part about this is where they deduce your intelligence. Really microsoft, the finest minds on earth have yet to come up with a satisfactory definition of the term, yet your goons are going to magicalgorithm the concept into your search results?

    3. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      What I'm hoping for is a search site that limits results to technical content even if the term has some other meaning in popular culture, and more to the point, blocks all the pop culture crap that hurts my oversized brain. Once they find ways to block all the highly complex content from the non-techies, it shouldn't be all that hard to invert the limits....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm waiting for the clippy that is tailored to someone who reads lol catz. "You can clikz teh helpz." "Teh green squiggiees mean haz bad gramma"

    5. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by thereitis · · Score: 2

      Why even deduce the intelligence of the person? First of all, this requires knowledge of the person searching, so more tracking of people and what they do or say. Second, they're most certainly going to be wrong in a large percentage of cases and will probably offend the person searching.

      Give people a way to tune the results themselves.. maybe I want an overview of a topic to see what it's about, and another day I want to delve deeper.

      Way to turn something simple into something that requires more tracking and profiling because, I guess, that's the trendy thing to do these days.

    6. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm waiting for the clippy that is tailored to someone who reads lol catz.

      Funny!, you should get a name in here so that you don't float around with such a low score.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Number one reason I dislike Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
            - H.L. Mencken

  3. You know you're a redneck.. by Cyphase · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know Microsoft thinks your dumb if you search for "secret service prostitutes colombia" and the first result is "Escorts discretas colombianos a precios asequibles".

    --
    by Cyphase ( 907627 )
    1. Re:You know you're a redneck.. by gman003 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And you know Slashdot thinks you're dumb because you just used the wrong "your".

  4. Google already doing this? by Frans+Faase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand that the results returned by Google are already customized to the user.

  5. Welcome to Clippy 2.0 by ArcadeNut · · Score: 2

    How about you just return the results that match what I typed in?

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
  6. This is pretty simple by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    I really wish these search companies would go back to their roots and provide bare metal search results.
    Stop geo/mood/intelligence filtering the results for me.

    Especially the geographic results. If I want results for my location, I'll include it in the search.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  7. Could be useful by Spacejock · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if a writer types 'How does someone publish there book?', Microsoft will send them to a spelling and grammar site instead of HarperCollins?

  8. So does it default to... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Can't find him on FaceBook. He must be stupid".

    -or-

    "Can't find him on FaceBook. He must be smart".

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  9. Alta Vista did this 15 years ago... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Alta Vista did this back in the nineties. Virtually any result I found was exactly what I was in the mood for! Thanks to Google, now I have to type specific words in to get porn. Innovation, pbtbtbt.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  10. Great. by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 2

    So, does that mean when I look at my Facebook Friends List, I'll start getting popups for Proazc, Paxil and Xanax?

    --
    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
  11. Oh my! by lahvak · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Honestly, professor, I searched for all these things that you told us to search for, but none of these links you are showing us ever came up!"

    --
    AccountKiller
  12. Trapped by personal history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I worry that customizing *search*, or customizing computer-based mediation/filtering of objective reality (as will be possible through video glasses and earphones) -- especially if made somewhat automatic by corporate-defined models of how people behave -- will eventually cause people to be trapped by their own personal history of thoughts and beliefs.

    It's like people being attracted to Fox News or the Rush Limbaugh radio show because of whatever thoughts and beliefs they have at the time, and then forever finding comfort there because of a lack of competing/challenging input (partly because the opportunity for alternative input is crowded out by the activity of viewing/listening to their initial media channel of choice).

    We are all familiar with "helpful" automation making choices that go against our personal wishes (or, at best, are simply unhelpful). But search (and, soon, mediated reality for the masses) creates the scary possibility of people becoming very isolated and trapped by their own history of personal actions and implied "preferences".

    I've sometimes done web searches for things in which I had only incidental interest -- topics which might even offend me, but which I would like to learn about for the purposes of being informed -- and the search service has inferred that I am actually generally interested in those topics. Needless to say, the chance for automated systems drawing the wrong conclusions is very high.

    I've seen blogs and discussion forums with communities with wacky beliefs, and it's sad that the insanity doesn't get any constructive criticism because of "moderators" (ironic term here) deleting any challenging/opposing comments. In the same way, unwittingly or intentionally, a person might become immersed in their own world of information.

    I actually like the idea of modifying reality! I'd love to surround myself with challenging and encouraging avatars with virtual reality glasses and earphones, because I think having personal coaches and cheerleaders around me all the time (virtually) would be a supernatural boost. I don't know how to reconcile my attraction for that idea with my general concern about people experiencing detrimental self-delusion, except to say that I think that *automatic* guesses about "preferences" seems bad.

    Although people can benefit from their memories (e.g., education and work experience) and past actions (e.g., earning money, buying and accumulating things), I worry about mechanisms that TRAP people in to their own legacy of memories and actions. Things like credit scores, criminal records, Internet records, etc, can make it difficult for people to change direction and grow, and have a new phase in their lives. Given the increasing role of Internet search and mediated reality in the lives of ordinary people, a new, and profoundly influential, mental trap is being built around them. I'm not judging it, but for some people their avatar in the World of Warcraft MMORPG is as much an influence on their lives as real-world people; and, in the same way, I think web search and mediated reality will eventually become the dominant influences in the lives of many people. I think the widespread absorption of people with their smartphones (after the earlier phenomenon of "Crackberry" devices) is somewhat telling.

  13. Re:uhhh by Longjmp · · Score: 2

    They didn't say how they measure intelligence.
    So maybe they add 150 to your default IQ if you don't post on facebook ;-)

    --
    There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
  14. I.Q. Too low by sjames · · Score: 3, Funny

    YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

  15. Re:If you're intelligent... by troff · · Score: 2

    Okay, fair enough. So, what features of the Microsoft products is it that meets your needs better?

  16. Inferred interest? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In addition to skewing the search results to the user's inferred interests, the user-following engine may further tailor the search results to a user's comprehension level.

    <Samuel L. Jackson Voice>
    Dear Condescending Microsoft Motherfuckers. My motherfucking search interests are directly expressed by my motherfucking search query - that's why I fucking entered it. In addition, there are times I want to actually *learn* something, which necessitates results above my current motherfucking comprehension level.
    </Samuel L. Jackson Voice>

    Why can't search engines simply answer the questions as I ask and let *me* worry about asking better questions?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  17. Re:I don't think MS's patent would work on me by Sporkinum · · Score: 2

    They will go lowest common denominator and serve you up results appropriate to Zippy the Pinhead.... Yow!

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  18. Re:all they need to do is eliminate ad pages by Garridan · · Score: 2

    Use duckduckgo. It doesn't tailor searches, doesn't track its users. It's "smart", too. When it can find potentially relevant info, it puts it right up at the top and suggests better searches based on that info. I've been using it for a week, and keep finding awesome features.