Slashdot Mirror


MIT Researchers Invent 'Super Glass'

redletterdave writes "On Thursday, researchers at MIT announced a breakthrough in glass-making technology, which basically involves a new way to create surface textures on glass to eliminate all of the drawbacks of glass, including unwanted reflections and glare. The research team wanted to build glass that could be adaptable to any environment: Their 'multifunctional' glass is not only crystal clear, but it also causes water droplets to bounce right off its surface, 'like tiny rubber balls.' The glass is self-cleaning, anti-reflective, and superhydrophobic. The invention has countless applications, including TV screens, as well as smartphone and tablet displays that benefit from the self-cleaning ability of the glass by resisting moisture and contamination by sweat."

199 comments

  1. Not so perfect by BagOBones · · Score: 5, Funny

    But can you build a whale tank with it?

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:Not so perfect by JoeDuncan · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. You need transparent aluminum for that.

    2. Re:Not so perfect by zazenation · · Score: 1

      With that remark, one might deduce that MIT had invented time travel...

    3. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or been witness to it.

    4. Re:Not so perfect by Saija · · Score: 2

      and a pc with dragon naturally speaking...

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    5. Re:Not so perfect by k31bang · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, we got that as well. I think it's called Aluminium oxynitride. $15 a square inch. Fun stuff. ;-)

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    6. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, all jumped up on LDS or something?

    7. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to think what happens when you fill the superhydrophobic tank in a space ship. The screaming, .. it's .. painful ..

    8. Re:Not so perfect by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I wonder how that would fare in a gas core nuclear rocket engine?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Not so perfect by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      No, but now with this, you can CLEARLY see the glass is half FULL.

    10. Re:Not so perfect by TWX · · Score: 1

      Or several inches of polymer, received in trade for the formula for transparent aluminum...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:Not so perfect by TWX · · Score: 1

      Hate to think what happens when you fill the superhydrophobic tank in a space ship. The screaming, .. it's .. painful ..

      Huh? It's not like balls of water are going to go shooting off at high speed- it's probably more like the surface of the tank won't have any liquid sticking, and when the tank gets full enough, the fluid just takes on the tank's shape. If anything, given the corrosive nature of many liquids, its possible that subjecting the tank to too much pressure could result in friction from the liquid despite the hydrophobic nature, leading to wear and permanently losing that hydrophobic nature.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re:Not so perfect by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      If it is as agressive as the Discworld Hydrophobes you could use it as a propellant. Make a tiny hole and the water will be expelled at extreme speeds, giving the vessel a high speed in the oposite direction.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    13. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or possible sapphire glass if you want to leave out the nitrogen.

    14. Re:Not so perfect by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

      its a startrek reference (Voyage Home??) oh btw i think you meant Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds not Latter day Saints

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    15. Re:Not so perfect by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      "Now with this, you can CLEARLY see the glass is TWICE AS BIG AS IT NEEDS TO BE."

      FTFY. (Original post, while somewhat humorous, was in the context of the optimist - pessimist continuum; correction recasts this into the engineering context of the rest of this discussion.)

      --
      Will
    16. Re:Not so perfect by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What advantage would this have over normal glass for a whale tank? What's wrong with regular glass, unless you needed it to, I don't know, transport whales in a Klingon bird of prey or something?

      I want the windshield of my next car to be made of this stuff! It might not even need windshield wipers. It'll put the Rain-X people right out of business.

      Drinking glasses would be another good use. EYEGLASSES! God but I hated my glasses. Walk in the rain and you can't see. Walk inside in the cold and they fog up and you can't see. Spectacles made of this wouldn't have those problems. Glad I had the implant so I don't need them any more, but this would be great for you guys.

    17. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That whooshing sound was the joke going over your head.

      "LDS" is ALSO a Star Trek/Voyage Home reference.

    18. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh

    19. Re:Not so perfect by MercTech · · Score: 1

      Naa, that is transparent aluminum, not super glass.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
    20. Re:Not so perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Melting point ~2150 C. Too low.

  2. Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me, it sounds like a very bold claim to eliminate all the drawbacks from anything. Maybe you made it a little bit better. But I don't think there is anything in this universe that you can eliminate all the drawbacks. I mean even eliminating a drawback tends to make a new drawback. Lets say you made glass so durable that it wouldn't fracture when hit with a hammer, then you might not want to use that glass in an emergency box which says,"In case of emergency, smash glass"

    1. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Negative Nancy!

    2. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right! I like dirty glass, so self-cleaning glass is a *hugs* drawback.

    3. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lets say you made glass so durable that it wouldn't fracture when hit with a hammer, then you might not want to use that glass in an emergency box which says,"In case of emergency, smash glass"

      That would only be a drawback if this new "super" glass, when synthesized, automatically replaces all existing glass. Or somehow makes it impossible to make regular glass. Also, most of those have been replaced with "OPEN in the case of emergency." Like as in the fire extinguisher is behind a door and you can just open it. Much less dramatic, which is, I suppose, a drawback. You'll still look like a hero putting out the fire, but without blood dripping down your arm while doing so, you'll lose a bit of heroicness.

    4. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Or in a car, in case the doors were obstructed after a crash...

    5. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by wickedskaman · · Score: 2

      Aww, that was nice! *hug* :)

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    6. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Lets say you made glass so durable that it wouldn't fracture when hit with a hammer, then you might not want to use that glass in an emergency box which says,"In case of emergency, smash glass"

      You mean like plexiglass is so durable it won't fracture when hit with a hammer - but when grooved, breaks with a modest tug on a bit of string?
       
      I.E. they'd no more use such glass in an emergency box without proper preparation than they would use current, bulletproof, glasses.

    7. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      To me, it sounds like a very bold claim to eliminate all the drawbacks from anything. Maybe you made it a little bit better.

      From the summery:

      MIT Researchers Invent 'Super Glass'

      is not only crystal clear, but it also causes water droplets to bounce right off its surface, 'like tiny rubber balls.' The glass is self-cleaning, anti-reflective, and superhydrophobic.

      The only drawback is trying to see through the "S shield."

    8. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by dumuzi · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I would run into my patio door far more often. Damn clean glass.

    9. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The generic drawback to making a material tougher (ie, more resistant to fracture on impact) is that it must be softer (ie, less strong). This obviously doesn't hold when comparing different materials, but you can wave your hands around if you like (compare steel to, say, glasses and ceramics).

    10. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by aled · · Score: 1

      To me, it sounds like a very bold claim to eliminate all the drawbacks from anything.

      TFA says "to eliminate all of the drawbacks of glass". I guess it means "drawbacks of (current) glass". It says nothing about new drawbacks. Let's suppose Super Glass(tm) is deadly radioactive. You may say that's a drawback, but is not a drawback of current glass.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    11. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Is it unbreakable? If yes, is it recyclable? On the other hand - I would like a superhydrophobic beer glass /funnel.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    12. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the summery

      Is that like springy, wintery or autumny?

    13. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. since this glass isn't likely to be free, and isn't likely to make "conventional" glass free either, I'd say it has failed to eliminate all the drawbacks of current glass..

    14. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And I would run into my patio door far more often. Damn clean glass.

      Yes, but your face wouldn't leave a greasy smear.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    15. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by BeardedChimp · · Score: 1

      Lets say you made glass so durable that it wouldn't fracture when hit with a hammer, then you might not want to use that glass in an emergency box which says,"In case of emergency, smash glass"

      That reminds me of Starship Titanic (the game). At one point you have to break some emergency glass to get a long stick, if you keep breaking the glass the ship informs you that it has now replaced it with unbreakable emergency glass to stop you. Must have used this stuff.

    16. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Yes, how are they going to keep the MIT grad students busy now? There goes the "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" project!

    17. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Just as bold to be making claims about something you haven't even seen yet.

    18. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your face would probably bouce of as well considering how much water it contains

    19. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      WAPITIR?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    20. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      That was a reference to the PHD Movie, but I guess few people watched it...

    21. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by RandomAdam · · Score: 1

      this may have been modded up due to his awesome name "GoodNewsJimDotCom" when he is being negative....well it made me smile, maybe should have been modded funny rather then insightful

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
  3. Vehicle Use? by teknoviking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you could incorporate this in vehicles windshields, you'd have the same benefits and maybe not need mechanical wipers or defrosters.

    1. Re:Vehicle Use? by ChatHuant · · Score: 2

      If you could incorporate this in vehicles windshields, you'd have the same benefits

      I don't know - windshields are made of tempered and laminated glass, which doesn't shatter on impact (it contains a layer of plastic bonded between two sheets of glass; this layer keeps pieces together so you get spider web cracking instead of pieces falling off) and which breaks in small chunks (as opposed to sharp shards flying all over the place). To temper glass you have to treat it with heat, which may destroy the surface cones the MIT process describes.

    2. Re:Vehicle Use? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      No wipers? This is sure to run afoul of the powerful Brotherhood of Parking Lot Leaflet Stuffers union. BoPLLS will be drafting model legislation to ban its use.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Vehicle Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's not saying you make the outside glass layer of this new stuff and the inside layer of glass from the current glass, you get benefit from new invention and stability and safety of current laminated benefits. Win-Win

    4. Re:Vehicle Use? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      No wipers? This is sure to run afoul of the powerful Brotherhood of Parking Lot Leaflet Stuffers union. BoPLLS will be drafting model legislation to ban its use.

      I doubt it, have you ever used that rain-x stuff that makes the water bead on your windshield? When I did, I found the beads of water to be very distracting while driving.

    5. Re:Vehicle Use? by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      No idea if it's that easy, but when testing your windshield design, please take the time to consider if pedestrians and cyclists will just bounce right off as well.

    6. Re:Vehicle Use? by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it could be an exterior piece of glass that was resin bonded to a conventional tempered glass windshield?

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    7. Re:Vehicle Use? by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Sounds good, until you're in a car on fire, and someone needs to smash the class to get you out...

    8. Re:Vehicle Use? by slippyblade · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ever tried to break windshield glass? It doesn't. That's the whole point of windshield glass. If you watch the videos of rescuers pulling folks out through windshields, the windshield itself has been removed or pried to the side. Smashed, crazed, but still in effectively one piece.

    9. Re:Vehicle Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes I have and I find the beads WAY less distracting than the two black moving bars flying across the windshield.

    10. Re:Vehicle Use? by tom17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's funny, I am used to using rain-x. When it wears and I need to start using the wipers again, I find the huge chunks of metal and rubber whooshing past my face to be very distracting while driving.

      It's all down to what you are used to :)

      Plus Rain-X does a much better job of giving you good visibility in seriously heavy rain (imo).

    11. Re:Vehicle Use? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      this would be a dream for film-makers wanting to shoot people in cars, but not wanting to use polarizing filters which make the female star's hair less impressive...

    12. Re:Vehicle Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean if they somehow jump over the iron spikes in the front of the car?
      What you mean what iron spikes?

    13. Re:Vehicle Use? by DinDaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy. Have little sprayers to get them wet just before they strike your windshield.

    14. Re:Vehicle Use? by DinDaddy · · Score: 2

      Great, now we're worrying about murderous film-makers . . .

    15. Re:Vehicle Use? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I wonder how abrasive this glass is. Would your wipers (or fingers) last about as long rubbing on this glass as compared to conventional glass?

      --
    16. Re:Vehicle Use? by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      They will just stick them in the separation between the car's door and the chassis.
      At least that's what a few of them started to do around these parts. I guess they figured out that it was annoying people (i.e. their possible customers) when it rains and the flier sticks to your window.

      I'm still hoping that they come to the conclusion that putting trash in my car is always anoying, but like spam, that won't happen until it stops being effective (and I doubt it will).

    17. Re:Vehicle Use? by gr8dude · · Score: 1

      What about all the stories about people who were not wearing a seat-belt, and who flew out of the car through the windshield?

      I don't own a car, I've never been involved in such types of accidents - so I'm genuinely curious. Perhaps windshields are designed to break from the inside, but not the outside?

    18. Re:Vehicle Use? by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      What about all the stories about people who were not wearing a seat-belt, and who flew out of the car through the windshield?

      ...

      I don't have direct experience with this, but I have heard of people with their head stuck in the windshield where the emergency responders needed to cut the windshield out around the victim to extricate them.

      I have also heard numerous reports of passengers ejected from vehicles, but I suspect they mostly come out the side windows. The only one I saw was a partial rejection from the drivers window. No need to describe the results but they were a good argument for wearing seat belts.

    19. Re:Vehicle Use? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Hydrophobic windscreens already exist, but after a while they get dirty and become pretty much like any other glass.

    20. Re:Vehicle Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to think that windshields were made of tempered glass as well, but it turns out they aren't. They are simply laminated non-tempered glass.

      Only side and rear windows are made of tempered (non-laminated) safety glass. Tempered glass shatters quite easily, but does not create large sharp shards.

    21. Re:Vehicle Use? by judoguy · · Score: 1
      I've broken a windshield without really trying. I was making an emphatic point one time (as a passenger) and the windshield cracked big time. It didn't shatter and blow out all over the road, but had to be replaced right away.

      I have no doubt at all that most guys could easily smash through a windshield to get out of a car in an emergency.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    22. Re:Vehicle Use? by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Tempered glass doesn't shatter? I was under the impression that glass was tempered so that it would shatter into many small pieces, rather than fracturing into a few large shards that are more dangerous. I agree about the lamination being there to keep the pieces together.

    23. Re:Vehicle Use? by janimal · · Score: 2

      They don't actually fly through the windshield. They take it with them. It's messy.

    24. Re:Vehicle Use? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      They're hard to break from the inside, too. I was driving a 1974 Gremlin at 50 mph in 1976 and had a left front tire blow out and was in the wrong lane watching a 3/4 ton pickup truck coming at me doing 70. No seat belt, the steering wheel was bent where I hung on to it, the dash was bent where my shoulder hit it, and my face was swollen badly from hitting the windshield. It didn't break. They're designed to be as hard to break as possible and to be the least dangerous when broken possible.

    25. Re:Vehicle Use? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It depends on the rain. If it's pouring down, Rain-X gives you clear vision, but if it's just misting you need the wipers because the beads will just sit there on the windshield until they grow enough to roll off.

    26. Re:Vehicle Use? by tom17 · · Score: 1

      True. And this annoys me to no end as I have to use the wipers and ruin my nice fresh Rain-X application.

      Hey, on the subject, I am actually finding that the application DOES last longer with those Rain-X branded wipers. It could just be in my head I guess, but it definitely seems that way.

      I also use the yellow Rain-X washer fluid.

      I have loved Rain-X ever since my racing days :)

    27. Re:Vehicle Use? by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between cracking the glass and breaking smashing it out. The vast majority of those cracks you see are not all the way through. They are only in a single layer of the glass and don't pass all the way through due to the bonded plastic layer between the layers of glass.

    28. Re:Vehicle Use? by swalve · · Score: 1

      I use the Rain-X wiper fluid too. It does eventually build up and act like a normal application of the stuff.

  4. Forget tablets & phones... by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this is as hydrophobic as they claim, I want a windshield made of the stuff.

    1. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... Idea - hydrophobic beer bottles.

      Would that even work?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmm.... Idea - hydrophobic beer bottles.

      Would that even work?

      No, 'cause then *all* of it would squirt out when you pop the top.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... Idea - hydrophobic beer bottles.

      Would that even work?

      Instant Diet Coke + Mentos effect. Great for practical jokes, not so great for beer drinking.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    4. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the same thing, and not just the windshield, but with every window. It seems like a permanent application of Rain-X that never fades. BTW, that stuff is awesome!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Great for practical jokes, not so great for beer drinking.

      WTF are you talking about? This might be the greatest advancement in human history in hybridizing "beer bong" and "drinking from the fire hose". EVAR.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Would make shotgunning a beer so much simpler to have it forced down (or even up) your throat under pressure. ;) No need to worry about swallowing slowing you down.

    7. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It could be the basis for self pouring beer technology.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      If its as hydrophobic as they claim, I want a glass bottom boat made with it. It'd be awesome- just like a mag-lev, but on water!

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    9. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Apothem · · Score: 1

      I would think it would. It'd make for the ultimate recyclable bottle. If it's hydrophobic and is self-cleaning, at that point you give them a simple scrub and they're back to being reused. The real question to me would be durability. If I drop my beer, is it going to go everywhere, or stay in the bottle? I suppose at that point, if you think of the other comments in this section, it'd make for some interesting effects.....

    10. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      you've not lived until you start buying rain-X brand windshield wiper fluid. It amounts to Rain-X that never fades because 'oh, the rain-x seems to have worn off' *press button* 'good to go!'

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell yeah, long self propelled tap lines from the keg cooler to the bar

    12. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by adolf · · Score: 1

      You can do that today: Just hold your nose, drop a Mentos into the bottle, plug the end of the bottle into your mouth, and hope the muscles at the back of your throat pick the right pipe for the stuff to be forced down...

      Or, you know: Drink a shot. Easier, faster, cleaner, more compact, and (if cost efficiency is a primary concern) often cheaper.

    13. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by psychonaut · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, a bathroom mirror.

    14. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Xelios · · Score: 1

      It'd be perfect... until you drive into a hail of tiny rocks a few times.

      --
      Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
    15. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Would YOU like to drink a beer that had been in a Hydrophobic bottle for days if not weeks? Imagine if your arachnophobic girlfriend was kept in a spider-lined room for days. Would you like to be there when the door was opened?

    16. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      I want a shower door made of this stuff. No more squeegeeing after every shower, no more scrubbing to get the hard water stains off when I forget to squeegee.

    17. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, don't give up the day job for a career in comedy

    18. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Untraceable broken beer bottle murder weapons. I'm staying home if they start using it.

    19. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Ah, you kids... back in the '70s they'd take a can of beer and a screwdriver, shake the can, poke it with the screwdriver and down it went. Mentos? God, the way they did it back then (notice I didn't say "we", I thought the practice was stupid) was bad enough!

      And, does that work with beer? I thought it was just diet coke?

      I agree that a shot is easier, faster, cleaner, and more compact, but a draft beer is $1.25 and the cheapest rotgut in the house is $2.75.

  5. Re:Just one problem... by lostmongoose · · Score: 1

    I blame California.

  6. I can see it now... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

    ...an influx of home videos of people running into sliding glass doors...and it is glorious.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by CubicleView · · Score: 5, Funny

      They might think they've made a breakthrough with this crystal clear non reflecting glass, but I just don't see it.

    2. Re:I can see it now... by NIN1385 · · Score: 1
      http://instantrimshot.com/

      This played in my head right after reading that.

      --

      If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
    3. Re:I can see it now... by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      They might think they've made a breakthrough with this crystal clear non reflecting glass, but I just don't see it.

      That's because of the breaking-through part.

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  7. Noooooo by Twinbee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But then how can we buy new TV sets that actually look glossy and new!

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:Noooooo by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I see a market for plastic coatings that people can put on their TV's to give them that glossy new look.

    2. Re:Noooooo by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Exactly, all market research indicated that people WANT reflections on their screens!

    3. Re:Noooooo by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      That's because they're not informed or educated. They can't figure out that screen reflections in shop translates to potentially annoying screen reflections at home.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    4. Re:Noooooo by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      But unfortunately that's why nobody will sell non-reflective screens.

    5. Re:Noooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Glossy" will become outdated, and all our shiny things will look to future people as bakelite looks to us.

    6. Re:Noooooo by swalve · · Score: 1

      That's because current matte screens have a sort of grey look to them, and the glossy screens look blacker.

  8. solar panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as it has good transparency for UV would this be good for solar panels. I mean self clean would save a lot of lives. Also would keep them running with less maintenance which always a good thing.

    1. Re:solar panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it has good transparency for UV would this be good for solar panels. I mean self clean would save a lot of lives. Also would keep them running with less maintenance which always a good thing.

      Really?!?! Are there lots of solar panel cleaning deaths that I haven't heard about?

    2. Re:solar panels by CubicleView · · Score: 2

      I think it's reasonable to assume that worldwide a number of window washers die on the job each year. I would hazard a guess that it would be a statistically significant amount considering the dangers inherent in swinging about on a rope several stories up with a bucket of sudsy water. But I really rather doubt it was much of a motivation for the scientists in MIT.

  9. Sounds Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So... does this mean our children will never have the experience of looking out the a window covered in drops of water on a rainy day? I know it's a stupid little thing, but there is something oddly therapeutic and beautiful about it. Almost sad that it might become a thing of the past.

    1. Re:Sounds Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Someone is writing an app for that right now...

      And filling a patent.

    2. Re:Sounds Relative by jxander · · Score: 1

      Unless a government mandate forces you to install "super-glass" in all your current windows, I think you'll be safe to ponder the meaning of life with your children as beads of rainwater streak down the glass.

      Or, worst case, they'll just make a "rainy day" channel for your TV... kinda how there's a yule log channel around the holidays.

      --
      This signature is false.
    3. Re:Sounds Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wonder why no jack-o-lantern channel at Halloween? Prolly offend some small yet very loud fringe group.

    4. Re:Sounds Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of makes you wonder what other of life's little beautiful `easter egg' features our ancestors had, that we'll never encounter.

      Then again, we'll never encounter cholera or typhoid either.

    5. Re:Sounds Relative by Coren22 · · Score: 1
      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  10. Re:Just one problem... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I blame California.

    Second.

    Those fuckers think everything causes cancer!

    Course, the sad part is, they're probably right...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  11. Can't wait to tint it by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    Maybe polish it up so it shines.

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  12. Cool...but a light diode would be neater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'd really like to see is a type of glass that is transparent in one direction *ONLY*... regardless of illumination levels.

    1. Re:Cool...but a light diode would be neater by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      IN THIS HOUSE WE OBEY THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS!!! - Homer Simpson

      And here's some more text to get around the caps filter. :)

  13. Alas, by idontgno · · Score: 1

    the glass is more fragile than a nerd's dreams of world dominance and scoring hawt supermodels, so you'll have to layer it under mere mortal Gorilla glass, losing all of those amazing Super surface texturing effects. But at least it'll appear in the BoM, and on the marketing, and in the price. Particularly in the price.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  14. "removes all drawbacks of glass" - overstatement. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Generally speaking, you can see through it both ways... that's a huge drawback of glass in a lot of cases.

    Tint or color, if any is present, is not changeable electronically

    I expect also that this doesn't remove the disadvantage of having to replace an entire pane when it gets cracked... where having something you could treat in-place and the crack would simply disappear would be ideal.

  15. What we really... by Luthair · · Score: 1

    want to know is: Did it pass the finger smudge test?

    1. Re:What we really... by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Agreed, there was nothing said about oily substance on the glass. I fear that, though they may have found a case for repelling water (for when I want to break out my tablet or HDTV in the pouring rain), body oil and what not will still be ever so wonderful to the screen for those who wish to see your swipe pattern (which you shouldn't be using, unless you use a stylus or carry a cloth with you.)

  16. Less monitor cleanup for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as long as it's superspermophobic.

    1. Re:Less monitor cleanup for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm superspermophobic. Keep it in your pants, buddy.

  17. Camera front elements by squidflakes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, glass with those properties being used for front elements on camera lenses would be amazing. Anti-glare without having to resort to all sorts of coatings, no fogging or moisture would be great too, especially if you're shooting in very humid environments.

    As long as the micro-structures on the surface didn't change the optical properties so much as to be detrimental to the incoming light.

    1. Re:Camera front elements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention internal reflections, including light bouncing back from the sensor. It'll be very interesting to hear what the potential impact might be on lens design and manufacture, particularly for long telephotos, where the kinds of glass used are cooled over a period of many months.

    2. Re:Camera front elements by shimage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wavefronts will reflect off of any surface where there is a change in wave speed. If the lens works as a lens, then it's hard to remove the reflections. Coatings work by reflecting the light back through the lens element (in a manner of speaking), so it still works well. If I understand the article correctly, some lab at MIT came up with a surface texture that causes water to bead. Probably the fact that it is very finely textured is the reason that reflections aren't a big problem. That is fine in the same way that matte screens are fine, but this isn't going to work if you want clear pictures. It might be ok on consumer lenses, though.

  18. superhydrophobia by trb · · Score: 5, Funny

    so this glass has really bad rabies?

    1. Re:superhydrophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain the joke you were trying to make. Thanks.

    2. Re:superhydrophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The joke works just fine, but it requires a degree of literacy to get it. Long ago, "hydrophobia" was the name given to what we now call rabies, as one of the early symptoms of the illness is that the person or animal stops drinking water and slowly becomes dehydrated.

      I would say that superhydrophobia is when you shoot Old Yeller, and he just gets back up, angrier than before. That's when you notice he's wearing a cape.

    3. Re:superhydrophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learnt something new, thanks!

    4. Re:superhydrophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you say it loud enough, you'll always SOUND PRECOCIOUS!

  19. Re:Just one problem... by PPH · · Score: 1

    It causes cancer

    In lab rats. Fed a steady diet of it.

    Which only translates as a risk to circus geeks who eat broken glass. Nevertheless, it will be banned in California (on the theory that the entire state is populated by circus geeks).

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  20. no more fogging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swim goggles, FTW!!!

  21. For comparison... by Twinbee · · Score: 5, Informative

    For comparison with a water droplet (the closer to 180 degrees you get, the closer to a perfect non-wettable/sticky surface you have):

    This new glass (165 degree contact angle)
    The upcoming Neverwet material (160 to 175 degrees)
    Lotus leaf or even some birds' feather (150 degrees)
    Rain-X (110 degrees - car windshield protector)
    Teflon (95-110 degrees - surprisingly low, but then it needs to be tough and heat-proof)
    Car wax (90 degrees)
    Human skin (90 degrees - PDF warning)

    I wonder what the durability of the glass is compared to Neverwet w(which is pervious to solvents, detergents, soap and high pressure water)...

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:For comparison... by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      Are you saying I could switch car wax for Human skin and get the same effect?

    2. Re:For comparison... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Probably, except, dead (or even alive) skin isn't quite so durable, or... mass producible come to that.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    3. Re:For comparison... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      To add if anyone's reading at this point, liquid mercury has a contact angle between 135 and 142 degrees. So that makes the top three even more "liquid-mercury-like" than liquid mercury, but obviously without the danger that substance brings to the table.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  22. Re:Just one problem... by Surt · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, I live in CA, and don't have cancer, and therefore get to laugh snarkily whenever I hear about some kid who has cancer in some other state begging make-a-wish to give him a nice day.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  23. Re:how much does it cost by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Coming soon: the $900 iphone 6 featuring "MIT Glass". People will buy it anyway.

  24. Re:"removes all drawbacks of glass" - overstatemen by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

    I've seen glass with a frost layer sandwiched in the middle that was electronically unfrosted.

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  25. magnetic? by incy_webb · · Score: 2

    if they can just find some way to magnetize it we can clean up broken glass with a magnet....

  26. Re:how much does it cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon: the $900 iPhone 6 featuring "borosilicate cracks-when-you-look-at-it-funny glass". People will buy it anyway.

  27. Superhydrophobic? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    How is this different than hydrophobic? Does water cross the street when it see this glass? Does the water bounce off the glass with a higher velocity than when it landed?

    1. Re:Superhydrophobic? by Twinbee · · Score: 3, Informative

      The contact angle of a water droplet has to exceed 150 degrees. This makes it even better at keeping the surface completely dry and dirt free. Plain 'Hydrophobic' is merely more than 90 degrees.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  28. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This super clear glass has been invented countless times in the past but every other inventor has always misplaced it. Now, if MIT has a process to find that super clear glass then they're really onto something.

  29. more applications ... by perles · · Score: 2

    It seems to be a good glass to make lenses for telescopes.

    1. Re:more applications ... by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      I would use it for the primary mirror, which tends to fog up when I take it outside without letting it acclimate. Maybe the other mirrors and lenses have the same problem, but it seems to be worse with the primary.

    2. Re:more applications ... by perles · · Score: 1

      I think all of them would benefit in one way or another. The corrector lens in the Maksutov-Cassegrains could be made of this special glass. Refractors and Schmidt-Cassegrains could also benefit.

  30. What about crappy shiny laptop screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will smart ass laptop manufacturers piss off their customers now? Make the screens even wider and shorter?
    A friend of mine asked me to fix their laptop, they had three custom browser bars installed, and the actual browser window was about 400 pixels high, ridiculous. Add to that the fact that all I could see in the screen was my face, or the ceiling lights above me, and it was almost impossible to see.

  31. If is all as stated..then it has great application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If is all as stated..then it has great application. Aircraft cockpit windows just for one. I am sure that fighter pilots would love to have clearer visibility ( at least thru the windows itself) while going 700+ mph in rain.

  32. Endless uses include: by TankSpanker04 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Porn-friendly monitors?

    1. Re:Endless uses include: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but they'll be super hydrophobic. Meaning that safety goggles will be a must for men.

    2. Re:Endless uses include: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn-friendly monitors?

      Insightful... really folks...?!

  33. Re:Just one problem... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    It is/We are. Welcome to California where we elect guys named Moonbeam to office. In our defense, you all promoted our astrology based governor to be president once...

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  34. Breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not sure that's the best word to use when you're talking about glass!

  35. Sliding glass doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to watch people walk into these all day long

  36. Re:Just one problem... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    You don't have cancer . . . . . . yet.

    Wait for it.

  37. Not April 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is my calendar wrong? Surely this is a joke.

  38. That's the Spirit by alien-alien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Spirit and Opportunity would have benefited greatly from glass that was self cleaning. Would not have needed to wait for Dust Devils and playful Mars Bunnies to clean off the photo cells.

    1. Re:That's the Spirit by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Yeah that martian rain would've washed the dust right off...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:That's the Spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly - solar collectors on rooftops may benefit too!

  39. Patents by SurfsUp · · Score: 1

    This is what patents are supposed to be for, instead of "sure we know its obvious but this time we did it with a computer!".

    --
    Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
  40. Superhydrophobic? by ebillcoyne · · Score: 1

    It's the minerals in the water that leave a residue. The water may splash off, but some minerals linger, and over time, they build up. They need to be cleaned off with something.

  41. Weight? by SwampChicken · · Score: 1

    There is no mention of how light/heavy this new super-glass is? (when compared to regular glass)

  42. Huge drawback: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The nanotowers are very brittle and if touched, they just crumble into dust.
    Unlikely ever to be used in any real world application where the surface
    is exposed to people randomly touching it (touchscreen cell phone or even a monitor.)

  43. cool, but bad link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please dont link to stories published at International Business Times. their business model is to publish whatever a business may want (check out their terms), and rely on mostly amateur content to drive the appearance of a full service online newspaper. some of their articles are really bad. the good ones are just regurtitated press releases and the like.

  44. Re:Just one problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And it just might - when these nice little 1000nmx200nm cones break off and you breathe them in, I wonder if it's better or worse than asbestos fibers. Mesothelioma here we come!

  45. Low-water toilet by bdwoolman · · Score: 2

    The surface sounds perfect to line the inside of a commode. Opaque better than transparent for this application, however. At least IMHO.

    Remember: You saw it on Slashdot before you saw it at the rest stop. w00t

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
    1. Re:Low-water toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw it in "The Mote in God's Eye" first :-P

    2. Re:Low-water toilet by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Do you really want the droplets to be bouncing off like little rubber balls?

  46. technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um, technology is always good, soon no longer need to mop ... joomla

  47. But will it blend??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will it?

  48. Perfect for Solar Panels by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Anti-reflective? This could be used to help solar panels capture more light.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  49. Does this mean we can now drive on solar panels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.solarpanelroadway.com

    Seems like this technology could be useful for that effort.

  50. Re:Does this mean we can now drive on solar panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry, got link wrong: http://www.solarroadways.com/intro.shtml

  51. Great news by qu33ksilver · · Score: 1

    Oh nice, they will be great shower panels !! If you know what I mean ..

  52. 3D Printing by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Been thinking a long time about 3D printing in the context of Neal Stephenson's - The Diamond Age. Particularly about the relative recycle-ability of various materials. Glass seems pretty ideal from a flexibility (can be used many ways) and recycling perspective. The high heat required to return it to a liquid state is a problem, as is it's brittleness (not suitable for as many applications as plastic).

    Does anyone have a link to a glass 3D printing machine?

  53. WIll it still break if you drop it? by moderators_are_w*nke · · Score: 1

    One of the reasons a popular cell-phone has sold so well is that it's made of glass and so shatters if you drop it. If this new glass is doesn't break when you drop it that will have a significant impact on sales.

    --
    "XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more." - Anonymous Coward
  54. Problem with this "breakthrough"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that it is not shatter-proof. Otherwise you couldn't "breakthrough" this "breakthrough".

    It's called a pun. Laugh.

  55. Why am I a Slashdot subscriber? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    Endless uses...

    Porn-friendly monitors?

    Marked +5 Insightful.

    That's why.

  56. Re:If is all as stated..then it has great applicat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fighter jet canopies are made of plastic.

  57. Re:Just one problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone gets cancer...it is a naturally occurring process in nature...you're just lucky your correction mechanisms/reactions are still working...for the moment...

  58. Much Cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a link to the abstract, the full paper requires registration but it's free to sign up.
    http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/nn301112t

    The paper is titled:

    "Nanotextured Silica Surfaces with Robust Super-Hydrophobicity and Omnidirectional Broadband Super-Transmissivity"

    Something not really mentioned in the article which is at least as cool as the water repelling and anti-fogging and super-strength:

    "Enhanced polarization-independent optical transmission exceeding 98% has also been achieved over a broad range of bandwidth and incident angles.

    And mind you, this is not just a "we discovered it!" paper, this is a paper on an actual manufacturing method:

    "Here we report a systematic approach to concurrent design of optimal structures in the fluidic and optical domains, and a fabrication procedure that achieves the desired aspect ratios and periodicities with few defects, and large pattern area.

    Very nifty looking stuff.

  59. Re:Just one problem... by Surt · · Score: 1

    It was a joke. Apparently no one got it.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  60. Don't be such a buzzkill... by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    We could name it the Splash/Pot.

    Whooooosh. = *Sound of toilet flushing...*

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  61. Darn! by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Busted! Is that you Larry.... Jerry?

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  62. superlipophilic by laughingskeptic · · Score: 1

    Superhydrophobic usually also means superlipophilic. It may shed water, but finger print grease is forever. Once you get enough grease on it, it won't seem so self-cleaning anymore.

    1. Re:superlipophilic by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      Not if it's texture-based rather than chemistry-based.

  63. fragile? by doug141 · · Score: 2

    They put micro-cones on the surface that are 5 times taller than they are wide. Might not stand up to handling or hail.

  64. Red Light cameras 1, drivers 0 by nobaloney · · Score: 2

    Anti-glare, self-cleaning, no reflections. There goes my ability to beat the red-light cameras.

  65. Not gonna happen with this tech by Turken · · Score: 1

    As nice as it would be to have windshields and drinking glasses made out of the "super" glass, in reality, it won't be happening, at least not for a very very long time.

    The fatal flaw in this "new" technology is that it requires precise and specific nano-scale texturing of the glass, but the only texturing methods that work on that scale right now are limited to very small flat surfaces. Eyeglasses *might* be possible, but at such an exorbitant price it would be entirely unpractical compared to glass/polymer composites that provide the same effect.

    And even if they did manage to develop the mythical nano-scale rollers that would allow for production of the "super" glass in bulk, it would still be limited to just flat panes. Any sort of forming process (pressing or blowing into molds for cups, sagging sheets for windshields, etc) would also quickly destroy the fine surface micro-structure.

  66. Glass that does not transmit heat (much) by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 2

    When I was a kid we went to the Corning glass museum in Corning NY. There they had a show room where they displayed all the stuff they could do with glass

    I seem to remember one display in which a flame was applied to one side of a piece of glass and a pot of water was on the other side with a thermometer in it to show the temp was just room temp, despite being subjected to open flame , separated only by that pane of glass.

    I wonder what ever became of that technology and why today it's not in every window in the world . The energy savings would be incredible- most air conditioning- heat or cooling- escapes through your window which has an R value of 2 or in the case of insulated glass unit (IGU) at best an R-value of 8.

    Self cleaing windows save water and that's a Good Thing, but heat blocking glass saves energy and that's a Very Good Thing.

  67. Eyeglasses? by splorp! · · Score: 2

    "The glass is self-cleaning, anti-reflective, and superhydrophobic." This sounds like the perfect glass for eyeglasses.

    --
    Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.