Slashdot Mirror
Last Bastion For Climate Dissenters Crumbling
Layzej writes "The New York Times reports: 'For decades, a small group of scientific dissenters has been trying to shoot holes in the prevailing science of climate change, offering one reason after another why the outlook simply must be wrong.' Initially they claimed that weather stations exaggerated the warming trend. This was disproven by satellite data which shows a similar warming trend. Next, solar activity was blamed for much of the warming. This looked like a promising theory until the '80s, when solar output started to diverge from global temperatures. Now, climate contrarians are convinced that changes in cloud cover will largely mitigate the warming caused by increased CO2. The New York Times examines how even this last bastion for dissenters is crumbling. Over the past few years, Several papers have shown that rather than being a mitigating factor, changes in cloud cover due to warming may actually enhance further warming."
It contributes to global warming.
Get yourselves over to www.weatheraction.com and learn.
They have an 80% accuracy record for long term forecasts. They understand what drives the climate on earth and it ain't CO2.
1) There's no such thing as global warming. 2) There's global warming, but the scientists are exaggerating. It's not significant. 3) There's significant global warming, but man doesn't cause it. 4) Man does cause it, but it's not a net negative. 5) It is a net negative, but it's not economically possible to tackle it. 6) We need to tackle global warming, so make the poor pay for it. 7) Global warming is bad for business. Why did the Democrats not tackle it earlier? 8) ???? 9) Profit.
When you finally realize that step #9 is the only one that matters here, you'll quickly realize that any and all steps taken before that is nothing more than FUD for a money grab, regardless of who is doing it or their political affiliation.
And if you wish to see a master in action, look up "Al Gore". After all, he's the one who created this "market".
The real rubbing point now is that the extent of damage of Global Warming, had been over exaggerated by scientists. In order to scare people to abstain from using their cars, they showed their research and pushed 4 or 5 sigmas out in their statistics, and implied it as fact.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
You put way too much emphasis on Science and scientific discoveries for The West's cancer like attitude towards growth. Yes, Science, it's discoveries and technological applications have enabled the unchecked growth at an unsustainable rate, but Science, like a gun, is merely the tool.
Western civilizations attitude towards Nature, natural resources and it's "Manifest Destiny" to conquer and control the natural world can be traced back to one very important book,
The Bible.
We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
No, it's not. That's just your straw man. And you wonder why people don't listen... AGW skeptics are being called names like "deniers".
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
"The IPCC report includes references to serious research that explain what they would expect to see happen between now and 2100 if CO2 emissions were dropped to 0 today."
The IPCC -- which, I should point out, after some revelations about its "science" and internal politics now has a credibility of near zero -- is not discussing the cost.
What would the cost be of dropping emissions to 0 today? Or even to 20% of current levels? Go ahead, look it up. I'll wait.
By proposing solutions without taking costs into account, you are doing nothing but pointless handwaving. You cannot be taken seriously.