Slashdot Mirror


1Gbps Wireless Network Made With Red and Green Laser Pointers

MrSeb writes "Back in the olden days, when WiFi and Bluetooth were just a glimmer in the eye of IEEE, another short-range wireless communications technology ruled supreme: Infrared Data Association, or IrDA for short. IrDA was awful; early versions were only capable of kilobit-per-second speeds, and only over a distance of a few feet. Trying to get my laptop and mobile phone to link up via IrDA was, to date, one of the worst tech experiences I've ever had. There's a lot to be said for light-based communications, though. For a start, visible (and invisible) light has a frequency of between 400 and 800THz (800 and 375nm), which is unlicensed spectrum worldwide. Second, in cases where you really don't want radio interference, such as hospitals, airplanes, and other sensitive environments, visible light communication (VLC), or free-space optical communication, is really rather desirable. Now researchers at the National Taipei University of Technology in Taiwan have transmitted data using lasers — not high-powered, laboratory-dwelling lasers; handheld, AAA-battery laser pointers. A red and green laser pointer were used, each transmitting a stream of data at 500Mbps, which is then multiplexed at the receiver for a grand total of 1Gbps."

44 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Is IrDA Korean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought IrDA was a famous Starcraft player...

    1. Re:Is IrDA Korean? by Anaerin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe you're thinking of IdrA

    2. Re:Is IrDA Korean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be a blast at parties.

  2. Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is old hat:
    http://www.airlinx.com/products.cfm/product/19-0-0.htm

    It's stuff you can just go buy in a shop, we've used it here for around 15 years to connect across a street to the other office. We have a laser interlink.

    1. Re:Not new by symbolset · · Score: 4, Informative

      And a screaming deal at only $28,000 for a pair.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Not new by dark12222000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're missing the point. The summary clearly states that the interesting point here is that it was done with cheap 10$ laser pointers that you can buy from Amazon. Yes, this was old tech - if you were willing to shell out 15k for high end gear. The fact that it can be reproduced for a much lower price (maybe a few hundred at most by the time you get integrated units and pay for research?) and therefore more likely to see more widespread usage, is the point.

    3. Re:Not new by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      1) Go to a rave with a laser light show.
      2) Run a bootleg wireless.
      3) ????
      4) PROFIT

    4. Re:Not new by julesh · · Score: 2

      The reason the available commercial equipment for this stuff is expensive has nothing to do with the quality of the laser, though (the site GP linked to specifies the laser in their entry level device as being a 7mW laser diode, so probably about 50% more powerful than the lasers used in the OP's article). The point is that it's expensive because the only application it's viable for is inter-building linkage, which *almost nobody wants to do*. You can't use it to replace ordinary wireless networks, because it's literally point-to-point: you have to stay stationary in a single pre-determined spot to receive a signal. The only real application is for large companies who have multiple buildings within line of sight of each other. This is a rather unusual situation. Thinking about organisations in my city, there are a couple of universities that could use it, and a hospital. Maybe a few schools. But then these guys can mostly just dig up the land between their buildings and lay cables, which will give higher capacity and more reliability (one of the universities has an issue because one of their buildings is separated from the rest by a public road... they might benefit from this).

    5. Re:Not new by khipu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that if you got the price down to about $50, people would find a lot more uses for this, including sharing network connections with friends (in particular in rural areas), secure communications, and distributing access points. Not everybody lives in cities with otherwise excellent coverage.

    6. Re:Not new by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Informative

      While the technology is old, the implementation seems to be new. Also, the form it has taken means that we are likely to see cheaper commercial solutions coming out or a whole bunch of hobbyists implementing this themselves - or both. $100 vs $4000+. I can just imagine mesh networks based on this.

      If these can be coupled with solar power and are of low energy use, then I can imagine these being alternative solutions to laying cables in remote areas.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re:Not new by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

      Even at $100 it may still be cheaper than digging up the ground and laying fibre optics in certain cases. I think what would really change things is if these were easily installable by someone who isn't a specialist.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    8. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Radio hams have been experimenting with point to point communication by light. It's been mountain-top to mountain-top so needs quite precise alignment. Also the data rates have been quite low - more voice. But the technique is quite old. We've known about modulating laser diodes for some time.

      A quick search reveals this site reporting a 104 mile link using LEDs. http://www.bluehaze.com.au/modlight/

    9. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's cheaper than my speaker cables!

    10. Re:Not new by tkohler · · Score: 2
      30 Mbps in ~1970

      from the very entertaining: Birth of the Laser Printer

      "The problem is, the bits are all coming out a kilometer away, and the printer’s down here at the other end, so how do we get the data to this thing?

      So, we sat down one time and said, "So why don’t we make an optical link?" Because we looked at doing microwave, but those were only three megahertz, and you’ve got to get enough FCC permission to do that, even then. So the interesting thing is there are no communications regulations on through-the-air optical communications. As long as the beam power doesn’t destroy things. [Laughter] We built something called a SLOT POLOS , which is the PARC On-Line Office System, Jeanie certainly would probably remember that, so SLOT POLOS On-Line Optical Link. And how do you do this?

      Well, I went to my friends Edmund again -- I’ll get free catalogs for the rest of my life [laughter] -- and basically bought four astronomical telescopes. These are just simple Newtonian reflectors. And put two in a box at the 3180 building, on the roof, and two on the roof of Building 34. I put a photomultiplier at the focus of one, and a laser at the focus of the other, and we had a full-duplex optical link running at 30 megabits a second. We used helium-neon for two reasons. First of all, relatively inexpensive -- accousto-optic modulators to turn it on and off. And by using visible light, there was only one risk: fog was a bad thing, because you couldn’t see through fog. On the other hand, if you used infrared, you couldn’t go through rain but you could go through fog. So, made a back-of-the-envelope judgment that rain was probably going to be more prevalent than fog, and went with the visible. It was a good choice, because I think we were only down one day due to fog, in the one year that this system was up."

    11. Re:Not new by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 2

      I can think of another use:
      Temporary in-room networking where security or bandwidth conjestion are a concern. I could envision a server room issue where you needed to understand what was happening at multiple points in your network that aren't normally tapped. You use something like a vampire tap and a raspberry pi to get copy off the data, analyze, and send back to something like splunk. However, rather than running temporary wires all over, instead send them by laser to the central monitor. Then when you're done, you can easily back out your taps.

      --
      I do security
  3. Great... Just Great... by TWX · · Score: 2

    Now I have another thing to implement for Bring Your Own Device...

    This does make me wonder, however, if we could see fiber optic gbics that don't cost thousands of dollars each if the technology that makes this free-air communication possible can be adapted to fiber optic applications.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How does the Mbit/mW compare to a 802.11b/g/n pringles cantenna?
    Which can achieve further distance assuming LOS?

    1. Re:Efficiency? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean like a disco ball?

  5. Wheres the "news" part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Laser based FSO isn't exactly a new field.
    1Gbps data rate with a diode laser isn't that hard to achieve even with pretty simple drivers and 1-bit amplitude modulation.
    Neither is using wavelength multiplexing some revolutionary new idea.
    So... huh?

    1. Re:Wheres the "news" part? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 2

      Cost?

    2. Re:Wheres the "news" part? by sveinb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's what I thought until I tried. Connected a laser pointer to a signal generator and measured its light output. As the frequency increased above about 1 MHz, the modulation level decreased to a non-usable level.

  6. Re:1Gbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    It's 1 megashark per giant octopus.

  7. The REAL question... by emag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, the real question is... how does this apply to /.'s new BI focus? Can I use this instead of spreadsheets or specialized software to properly align my Business Intelligence with the synergies of the corporation for maximization of profitability?

    Ouch, that hurt...

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  8. Old news...they wear out by drwho · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was done years ago. I remember seeing the story, I think it was on gbppr. The problem is, these laser pointers aren't designed to be used constantly and they wear out.

    1. Re:Old news...they wear out by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Got a source on that? Laser diodes don't "wear out" as far as I am aware. They may be damaged by thermal runaway in the short term or long term by poor design but the only critical factors here is the stability of the current source, choice of bias point, and thermal design. They certainly don't get tired over time.

    2. Re:Old news...they wear out by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      The manual for my green laser pointer cautions you against using it constantly - I'm guessing the heatsink arrangements are not what they could be in there.

      The researchers probably took them apart and made sure they were properly cooled though.

  9. Re:radio lasers by mpoulton · · Score: 3, Informative

    Are there any radio lasers around?

    That would be a MASER (microwave, not light), and they predate lasers. However, a maser holds no advantage over a regular microwave transmitter for terrestrial communications. The distance of point to point microwave links with standard radio technology is limited by the curvature of the earth, not power or beam divergence. Even with tall towers, it's very hard to obtain a line of sight path between two points on earth more than about 50 miles apart.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  10. Re:I am still waiting for the day.. by Amouth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the one thing IrDa worked great for was using my HP Jornada with my HP 2100 printer .. was also nice to use the Jornada to print on campus because while they had the pay per page on lpr prints all the printers had an exposed IR port that would just blindly print what was sent. It was also useful to use my iPaq as an A/V Remote control.

    what i never did understand is why it was a standard BUT placement and usable angle was never part of the standard.. I've got a 8525 that has it.. on the damn bottom of the phone... where it is completely useless.. and i remember a lot of laptops that put it on the side of the device and had no usable angle other than head on..

    it wasn't a bad spec for the time and the proposed use (a wireless serial connection) but the implementations left a good bit to be desired..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  11. Enjoy It While It Lasts by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's only a matter of time before the MPAA/RIAA gets this outlawed because pirates could be using it to broadcast entire ripped DVDs to each other in mere seconds using sharks with frickin' multiplexin' red and green lasers attached to their heads! You laugh, but it will happen.

  12. A similar project by ard · · Score: 4, Informative

    A proof of concept on laser pointer networking was done two years ago, if you are interested see
    http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?searchId=4&pid=diva2:325270 - Fulltext at
    http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:325270/FULLTEXT01

  13. The toughest part...... by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Funny

    is getting the sharks to hold still.

  14. Re:I am still waiting for the day.. by DavidD_CA · · Score: 2

    Your comment reminded me of my old laptop and cell phone, both which had IrDA.

    I never even thought about it, of course, until one day I set my cell phone down exactly line-of-sight to the laptop and both of the devices lit up and started talking to each other. The laptop even made a funny zap noise. Freaked me out.

    --
    -David
  15. Re:radio lasers by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

    Yeah, using laser pointers is a good idea, but what do you do when the cats jump on your data?

  16. Cell Towers? by aaronb1138 · · Score: 2

    I'm surprised the cell phone companies haven't implemented something similar on their towers to reduce backhaul. Have dozens of towers in a given area relay optically to a super node tower with amazing backhaul. Have them relay to a few others in a standard mesh network layout for redundancy. Might even reduce their spectrum need if they are using channels to talk tower to tower. May have some issues with rain I suppose though, but that could be mitigated if laser wavelengths for which water is not refractive exist. Or just use laser arrays with heavy multiplexing and parallel signal reinforcement.

    1. Re:Cell Towers? by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Visible line-of-sight issues ruin the possibility in many applications. Rain is murderous to low-power visible light connections, as is fog and snow. Even wind will affect a laser-based length over any substantial distance as the end-points sway (and yes, all towers sway in the breeze).

      Meanwhile, cell towers quite commonly already link with microwave: The big parabolic reflectors covered with fiberglass radomes that you see on many (perhaps most, or nearly all) cellular towers are not for subscriber usage, but to link neighboring towers together. This is often done using licensed frequencies, though unlicensed bands are also used.

      There are generally also redundant backhauls using copper or fiber or both, but I guess the point I'm trying to make is that cell towers -already- use wireless RF backhauls...and that the tech described in the article isn't likely to change that.

      As it stands, resistance to rain-fade and other weather seems to be excellent, at least anecdotally: I've never experienced it, and I've carried a cell phone for at least 1.5 decades.

      (Disclaimer: I work with RF and wide-area long-range wireless networking as part of my day job, though not necessarily with back-end cellular systems in particular. Just because optical networking seems like a general non-starter to me doesn't mean that it's unsuitable for the uses that you suggest.)

  17. Unlicensed Spectrum? Unbelievably Reckless!! by burnttoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a start, visible (and invisible) light has a frequency of between 400 and 800THz (800 and 375nm), which is unlicensed spectrum worldwide.

    My God! They're broadcasting my movies over an unlicensed, unregulated carrier! This MUST be stopped! This "visible" light will aid paedophiles, piracy, terrorists, drug dealers and all manner of criminality!

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  18. lower bit rate for me by pbjones · · Score: 2

    not good for 20% of males that have red/green defective colour vision, you desensitised clod...

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  19. Also of interest to the low-cost DIY crowd by subreality · · Score: 5, Informative

    10Mbit, 1200-1400 meter range, GFDL-licensed open designs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RONJA

    Instead of lasers they use LEDs with relatively inexpensive lenses.

  20. Been done by silentcoder · · Score: 2

    A group of students at The University of Pretoria in South Africa did exactly this while I was still studying there, this was circa 2001.
    A large part of their motivation was to help build a technology for high-speed networks that were not subject to the state protected telecoms monopoly.

    They used almost exactly the same technology, lazer-pointers for sending streams, but I believe they used solar-cells for receivers.

    I remember they boasted speeds of over 1mbs which (back then) was incredibly fast (in fact faster than the internal buffers of the P2 computers they used - so that the data actually slowed DOWN after being received) but I don't believe they ever went beyond a single point-to-point connection.

    Maybe one of the students who were involved is on slashdot and can give more details ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  21. Re:radio lasers by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

    Beam divergence is a bitch at low frequencies. EM signals don't travel in a straight line, a ray of them tends to get wider over distance. This effect is stronger at low frequencies. For space you need the highest frequencies you can get if you want to have some usable distance. Gamma lasers would be preferable, if it were possible to make those.
    Or you'd need a very wide beam and thus a very large laser/maser.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  22. Re:radio lasers by julesh · · Score: 2

    That made me think of blue lasers, which would have even better rates.

    But, how about longer waves, such as infrared or even radio?

    A typical 1.5mW near-IR laser diode can emit at 2.5Gb/s and costs only about 3 times as much as a laser pointer, so is more economical.

  23. Re:O RLY? by jamesh · · Score: 2

    > visible (and invisible) light has a frequency of between 400 and 800THz (800 and 375nm), which is unlicensed spectrum worldwide.

    Well, that's good.

    Cadbury has attempted an interesting approach to try and license some of that spectrum.

  24. Re:IrDA worked fine by deroby · · Score: 2

    I remember copying files from one laptop to another via the IR ports. There was an option in the BIOS (Dell) to chose between 'Normal IR' and 'Fast IR' and the latter gave something like 6Mbit I seem to remember, not sure, but it surely was fast enough to copy setups and iso's etc. Sure we were not allowed to move the laptops around in the meanwhile, but copying things was much faster over that link than using the 10Mbit network that was shared with the entire floor.
    Eventually we found out about using a direct FireWire connection whenever we need to transfer large stuff and didn't want to hog the network; used to be the fastest link one could think of between 2 computers until 1Gbps Ethernet came out... In fact, I still use it [FireWire] for that very purpose from time to time as it doesn't require me to modify the Ethernet adapter settings (fixed IP etc) when I want to do poin-to-point

    --
    If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
  25. Re:I am still waiting for the day.. by james_van · · Score: 4, Funny

    Im reminded of my high school days- I had a laptop with irda (1998'ish) and the printer in our tech lab had irda as well. The printer had a print server attached that would queue up all the print jobs, but the irda port would take priority over anything in the queue. Our teacher had a vendetta against trees and would insist that we print everything, so about 5 minutes before class would end, everyone would start lining up at the printer. About 4 minutes before class would end, I would hit print on a 50-60 page Word doc and gloat to myself as everyone started freaking out. Yeah, i was a techno-douche.